三相中空纤维液相微萃取在羟基苯甲酸类化合物分析中的应用

在优化的三相中空纤维液相微萃取(3p-HFLPME)条件下,研究了6种羟基苯甲酸类化合物(HBAs)的3p-HFLPME行为;揭示了HBAs的富集因子(EF)与其正庚醇/水条件分配系数(log Pn-heptanol/5 mmol/L HCl)、pKa和羟基数目(N)的相关性,初步阐明了聚偏氟乙烯中空纤维对HBAs的电荷转移传递机理以及有机溶剂对HBAs的选择性萃取机理。优化的3p-HFLPME条件: 以MOF 503聚偏氟乙烯中空纤维为有机溶剂支持体,正庚醇为有机相,5 mmol/L HCl体系为给体,80 mmol/L NH3·H2O为接受相,搅拌速度为1200 r/min,萃取35 min。该方法的精密度（以相对标准偏差计）小于3%,检出限为0.09~30.00 μg/L,加标回收率为93.3%~107.1%,HBAs质量浓度为5 mg/L时的富集因子最高达107.6倍。     

中空纤维碳纳米管/正辛醇固-液协同微萃取机理及其应用

讨论了以中空纤维为载体的碳纳米管/正辛醇固-液协同微萃取机理,建立了中空纤维碳纳米管/正辛醇固-液协同微萃取-高效液相色谱法同时测定复杂样品中微量咖啡酸、阿魏酸和肉桂酸含量的方法.以2.5 cm长的聚偏氟乙烯中空纤维为碳纳米管正辛醇分散液载体,供相为分析物的HCl(pH 2.1)溶液,接受相为pH 12.7的NaOH溶液,在35℃下,搅拌萃取60 min,萃取液进行高效液相色谱紫外检测.在优化的实验条件下,分析物的线性范围均在0.05～50 μg/L,r＞0.9990 (n=5);检出限均为0.015μg/L;日内与日间精密度均小于9.8％(n=9),平均回收率为93.8％～115.2％;富集倍数分别为514,942和1084倍.在以中空纤维为支持体的碳纳米管/正辛醇微萃取中,碳纳米管/正辛醇分散液嵌入中空纤维管壁上的微孔中形成了碳纳米管/正辛醇固-液微萃取单元束,对苯丙烯酸类化合物起到协同萃取作用.     

中空纤维三相液相微萃取-高效液相色谱法测定水中的4种酚类化合物

建立了中空纤维液-液-液三相微萃取-高效液相色谱法测定水中4种酚类化合物的方法.实验系统地优化了影响萃取效率的因素(包括有机溶剂种类、接收相浓度、分散相pH值、加盐量、转速及萃取时间).得到的最佳萃取条件为:萃取剂为正辛醇,接收相NaOH溶液的浓度为0.09 mol/L,分散相的pH为4,萃取时间为40 min,搅拌速...     

基于中空纤维的液相微萃取技术的研究进展

基于中空纤维的液相微萃取集采样、萃取、浓缩于一体,具有成本低,溶剂用量少,易与高效液相色谱、气相色谱、毛细管电泳联用等特点。该技术不仅可实现较高的回收率和富集效率,而且具有突出的样品净化功能,是一种环境友好的样品前处理新技术。该文对基于中空纤维的液相微萃取的装置、操作模式、基本原理及近年来应用研究的进展进行了综述。     

中空纤维液相微萃取-高效液相色谱法测定水中3种除草剂残留量

应用中空纤维液相微萃取-高效液相色谱法测定水中二氯喹啉酸、特丁噻草隆、戊炔草胺等3种除草剂的残留量。样品以聚丙烯中空纤维为支撑,正辛醇萃取,以600r·min-1转速在40℃的条件下萃取20min。所得净化液以Inertsil ODS-SP C18色谱柱为分离柱,以甲醇-水(82+18)混合液为流动相,在检测波长220nm处进行测定。3种除草剂在一定的质量浓度范围内与其峰面积呈线性关系,方法的检出限(3S/N)在0.20~0.35μg·L-1之间。以地表水样为基体进行加标回收试验,所得回收率在90.6%~106%之间。方法的相对标准偏差(n=6)在3.1%~6.8%之间。     

基于中空纤维液相微萃取的麻黄碱和伪麻黄碱优势构象的确定及含量测定

利用中空纤维液相微萃取方法(HF-LPME)分析麻黄碱和伪麻黄碱在不同基质中的优势构象,阐明了麻黄碱和伪麻黄碱的萃取机理;结合高效液相色谱(HPLC)建立了微量麻黄碱和伪麻黄碱的分离测定方法。以聚偏氟乙烯中空纤维为有机溶剂载体,正己醇为萃取溶剂,麻黄碱和伪麻黄碱的NaOH(5 mol/L)溶液为样品相,0.01 mol/L H2SO4溶液为接收相,在1200 r/min转速下萃取35 min,收集萃取液直接进行HPLC分析。麻黄碱和伪麻黄碱在水溶液中的线性范围为5～100 μg/L,检出限分别为1.9 μg/L和1.2 μg/L,富集倍数分别为38和61倍,平均回收率分别为100.6%±1.2%和103.2%±3.5%;在鼠尿液中的线性范围为100～5×104 μg/L,检出限分别为30 μg/L和42 μg/L,富集倍数分别为20和17倍,平均回收率分别为108.4%±4.4%和106.1%±5.4%。研究表明该方法操作简单,选择性高,适用于微量麻黄碱的含量测定和分析。     

多孔中空纤维液相微萃取技术的研究进展

基于多孔中空纤维的液相微萃取集采样、萃取和浓缩于一体,具有成本低,易与多种分析仪器联用等特点,该技术不仅可得到较高的富集倍数和回收率,而且具有突出的样品净化功能,有机溶剂用量非常少,是一种环境友好的样品前处理新技术,国内尚未广泛应用。本文综述了多孔中空纤维液相微萃取的主要装置、萃取模式、影响因素及其应用,引用文献54篇。     

中空纤维膜液相微萃取/高效液相色谱法测定水样中4种头孢菌素的含量

基于中空纤维膜液相微萃取/高效液相色谱(HF-LPME/HPLC),建立了水样中痕量头孢唑林(CZO)、头孢呋辛(CXM)、头孢他定(CAZ)和头孢西丁(FOX) 4种头孢菌素残留的检测方法。优化得到最佳萃取条件:萃取溶剂为1-辛基-3-甲基咪唑六氟磷酸盐([Omin]PF_6),辅助萃取溶剂为10%三正辛基氧膦(TOPO),样品溶液pH值为2.5,萃取时间为20 min,萃取温度为30℃,搅拌速率为600 r/min。以Agilent Poroshell 120 EC-C_(18)(100 mm×4.6 mm,2.7μm)为色谱柱,以0.05 mol/L醋酸钠缓冲液(pH 4.0)-乙腈(9∶1,体积比)为流动相,4种头孢菌素可在7 min内完全分离。结果表明4种头孢菌素的线性关系良好,富集倍数为45～78倍,检出限为0.2～0.7 ng/mL,回收率为83.2%～102%,相对标准偏差为2.0%～9.8%。该方法简单高效,检测成本低,溶剂用量少,绿色环保,灵敏度高,对水样中痕量头孢菌素残留的富集能力强。     

在线中空纤维膜液相微萃取/高效液相色谱法测定3种痕量芳香胺

建立了一种在线中空纤维膜液相微萃取/高效液相色谱联用技术测定3种痕量芳香胺(邻甲苯胺、3,3'-二甲基联苯胺、2-萘胺)的新方法,以顺序注射仪将中空纤维膜液相微萃取装置和高效液相色谱仪连接搭建在线检测装置,利用此装置优化了萃取溶剂、供体相、接收相、盐效应、搅拌速度、萃取时间等前处理条件。结果表明,以正辛醇为萃取溶剂,0.1 mol·L-1Na OH与300 mg·L-1的Na Cl溶液为供体相,0.1 mol·L-1HCl溶液为接收相,搅拌速度为400 r·min-1,萃取40 min后,3种芳香胺的富集倍数可达48~96倍。该方法对3种痕量芳香胺的线性范围为0.01~0.25 mg·L-1,相关系数(r)不小于0.998 4,检出限为0.3~2.2μg·L-1,相对标准偏差(RSD,n=10)为3.1%~4.0%,用于印染废水中3种芳香胺的分析,回收率为98.0%~102.0%。该方法操作简单,有机溶剂用量少,富集率较高,可用于痕量芳香胺类物质的快速分析。     

基于中空纤维液相微萃取的大鼠体内大黄素及其代谢物分析

建立了中空纤维液相微萃取(HFLPME)耦合高效液相色谱法(HPLC)用于测定血浆和尿液中大黄素及其代谢物的浓度,比较了中药有效成分大黄素在不同性别大鼠体内的吸收和代谢能力,阐述了大黄素在体内的代谢和转化过程。本实验以聚偏氟乙烯纤维为溶剂载体,正辛醇为萃取溶剂,对血浆和尿液样品进行HFLPME处理,萃取后挥干有机溶剂,用50 μL甲醇溶解,进行HPLC测定。在优化的微萃取条件下,血浆和尿液样品中大黄素及其代谢物标准曲线线性良好(相关系数(r)大于0.9960);检出限为0.1～3.0 μg/L;富集倍数为12.2～26.3;日内、日间精密度(以相对标准偏差(RSD)计)小于11.0%;血浆和尿液中代谢物的平均回收率为97.9%～103%。HFLPME操作简单,富集倍数高,能有效去除生物样品中复杂基体的干扰,适用于复杂样品中微量、痕量成分分析物的分析测定。     

Application of hollow fiber liquid phase microextraction for the determination of insecticides in water

In the present work, a novel sample pre-treatment technique for the determination of trace concentrations of some insecticide compounds in aqueous samples has been developed and applied to the determination of the selected analytes in environmental water samples. The extraction procedure is based on coupling polypropylene hollow fiber liquid phase microextraction (HF-LPME) with gas chromatography by flame thermionic detection (GC-FTD). For the development of the method, seven organophosphorous insecticides (dichlorvos, mevinphos-cis, ethoprophos, chlorpyrifos methyl, phenthoate, methidathion and carbofenothion) and one carbamate (carbofuran) were considered as target analytes. Several factors that influence the efficiency of HF-LPME were investigated and optimized including agitation, organic solvent, sample volume, exposure time, salt additives and pH. The optimized methodology exhibited good linearity with correlation coefficient = 0.990. The analytical precision for the target analytes ranged from 4.3 to 11.1 for within-day variation and 4.6 to 12.0% for between-day variation. The detection limits for all analytes were found in the range from 0.001 to 0.072 microg/L, well below the limits established by the EC Drinking Water Directive (EEC 80/778). Relative recoveries obtained by the proposed method from drinking and river water samples ranged from 80 to 104% with coefficient of variations ranging from 4.5 to 10.7%. The present methodology is easy, rapid, sensitive and requires small sample volumes to screen environmental water samples for insecticide residues.     

Application of ionic liquid in liquid phase microextraction technology

Ionic liquids (ILs) are novel nonmolecular solvents. Their unique properties, such as high thermal stability, tunable viscosity, negligible vapor pressure, nonflammability, and good solubility for inorganic and organic compounds, make them excellent candidates as extraction media for a range of microextraction techniques. Many physical properties of ILs can be varied, and the structural design can be tuned to impart the desired functionality and enhance the analyte extraction selectivity, efficiency, and sensitivity. This paper provides an overview of the applications of ILs in liquid phase microextraction technology, such as single‐drop microextraction, hollow fiber based liquid phase microextraction, and dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction. The sensitivity, linear calibration range, and detection limits for a range of target analytes in the methods were analyzed to determine the advantages of ILs in liquid phase microextraction.     

中空纤维三相液相微萃取-高效液相色谱法测定环境水样中7种苯氧羧酸类除草剂

建立了利用中空纤维三相液相微萃取-高效液相色谱联用技术(HF-LPME-HPLC)同时测定环境水中痕量麦草畏(dicamba)、氟草烟(fluroxypyr)、4-氯苯氧乙酸(4-CPA)、2甲4氯(MCPA)、2,4-滴(2,4-D)、2,4-滴苯氧丁酸(2,4-DB)和2甲4氯苯氧丁酸(MCPB)等7种苯氧羧酸类除草剂的分析方法。考察了萃取剂﹑接受相和给出相pH值、萃取时间﹑搅拌速度和盐效应等对检测的影响,通过正交试验优化萃取条件,得到的最佳萃取条件为正辛醇作萃取剂,给出相pH为3,接受相pH为12,萃取30 min,搅拌速度400 r/min。结果表明7种除草剂在较宽的线性范围内线性良好,相关系数为0.9953～0.9988,检出限(信噪比为3)为0.2～1.0 μg/L,富集倍数为76.7～121,加标回收率为68%～104%,相对标准偏差为3.2%～8.1%。该法灵敏度高、操作简单、检测快速、有机溶剂消耗少,为环境水样中痕量苯氧羧酸类除草剂残留的分析提供了有益的参考。     

Hollow fibre liquid phase microextraction of parabens

A hollow fibre liquid phase microextraction for gas chromatographic determination of some p-hydroxybenzoic acid esters has been developed. Chlorobenzene containing tetradecane as internal standard was used for the extraction. Optimized extraction was carried out at room temperature for 40 min in the presence of 0.4 g mL⁻¹ NaCl in the sample solution. Calibration was linear up to 30 mg L⁻¹. Correlation coefficients were 0.996–0.998. Enrichment factors were 21, 95 and 154, and detection limits were 0.20, 0.03 and 0.01 μg mL⁻¹ for methylparaben, ethylparaben and propylparaben, respectively. Reproducibility was acceptable with relative standard deviations up to 11.7%. The technique was tested for water and urine analysis.      

Headspace single drop and hollow fiber liquid phase microextractions for HPLC determination of phenols

Two methods based on headspace single drop microextraction (HS-SDME) and headspace hollow fiber liquid phase microextraction (HS-HF-LPME) were developed and critically compared with HPLC-UV determination of phenols (including phenol (Ph), 2-chlorophenol (CP), 2,4-dichlorophenol (DCP) and 2,4,6-trichlorophenol (TCP)) in this paper. The significant parameters affecting the extraction efficiency of the target analytes in both extraction modes were studied and the optimal extraction conditions were established. Under the optimal conditions, the detection limits (S/N = 3) for Ph, CP, DCP and TCP obtained by HS-SDME-HPLC-UV and HS-HF-LPME-HPLC-UV were 2.1, 0.2, 0.8,1.1 ng/mL and 4.2, 0.4, 0.4, 0.4 ng/mL with enrichment factors of 15.8, 198.9, 159.7, 194.8 and 9.2, 149.9, 301.9, 411.1, respectively. The RSDs obtained by HS-SDME-HPLC-UV and HS-HF-LPME-HPLC-UV were 3.7, 4.0, 9.8, 6.7% and 6.3, 3.6, 3.1, 4.8% for Ph, CP, DCP and TCP, respectively. Both extraction modes have a comparable analytical performance, but HS-HF-LPME was more robust than HS-SDME, while HS-SDME was simpler than HS-HF-LPME. The two headspace microextraction modes were applied for HPLC-UV determination of target phenols in water, honey and toner samples, and the determined values obtained by both techniques were in good agreement with each other.     

Comparison of three‐phase hollow fiber liquid‐phase microextraction based on reverse micelle with conventional two‐phase hollow fiber liquid‐phase microextraction and their applications for analysis of cinnamic acids in traditional Chinese medicines

A novel three‐phase hollow fiber liquid‐phase microextraction was developed based on reverse micelle as extraction solvent and acceptor phase, and compared with conventional two‐phase hollow fiber liquid‐phase microextraction. Both procedures were used in the extraction and concentration of four cinnamic acids (caffeic acid, p‐hydroxycinnamic acid, ferulic acid, and cinnamic acid) in traditional Chinese medicines prior to high‐performance liquid chromatography analysis. Parameters affecting the two procedures were investigated and optimized to obtain the optimum enrichment factors. The mechanism of the developed procedure was explored and elucidated by comparison with conventional two‐phase hollow fiber liquid‐phase microextraction. Under the optimized conditions, the analytes’ enrichment factors were between 50 and 118 for the proposed procedure, and 31–96 for conventional two‐phase mode. Satisfactory linear ranges (r² ≥ 0.99), detection limits (0.1–0.6 ng/mL), precisions (<9.2%), and accuracies (recoveries: 80–123.1%) were observed for the two procedures. The results showed that the enrichment capacity of the proposed procedure for the cinnamic acids is better than that of conventional two‐phase procedure, and both are eco‐friendly, simple, and effective for the enrichment and detection of cinnamic acids in traditional Chinese medicines.     

Emulsification liquid phase microextraction followed by on-line phase separation coupled to high performance liquid chromatography

An emulsification liquid phase microextraction followed by on-line phase separation coupled to high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) is introduced based on a novel idea for the separation of dispersed organic phase from aqueous phase. In this method, the dispersed organic extraction phase was filtered using an in-line filter and it was separated from the water sample. The new approach is simple and, in addition to improving some limitations of the conventional emulsification liquid phase microextraction, eliminates the need for centrifugation in the phase separation step.     

Determination of aristolochic acid in urine using hollow fiber liquid-phase microextraction combined with high-performance liquid chromatography

A simple and efficient hollow fiber liquid‐phase microextraction (HF‐LPME) technique in conjunction with high‐performance liquid chromatography is presented for extraction and quantitative determination of aristolochic acid I in human urine samples. Several parameters influencing the efficiency of HF‐LPME were investigated and optimized, including extraction solvent, stirring rate, extraction time, pH of donor phase and acceptor phase. Excellent sample clean‐up was observed and good linearity with coefficient of 0.9999 was obtained in the range of 15.4–960 µg/L. This method provided a 230‐fold enrichment factor and good repeatability with relative standard deviations (RSD) lower than 6.0%. The limit of detection value for the analyte in urine sample was 0.01 µg/L at a signal‐to‐noise ratio of 3. The extraction recovery from urine samples was 61.8% with an RSD of 9.71%. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.