Growth hormone (GH) responsiveness to combined administration of arginine and GH-releasing hormone does not vary with age in man

At present, the mechanism(s) underlying the reduced spontaneous and stimulated GH secretion in aging is still unclear. To obtain new information on this mechanism(s), the GH responses to both single and combined administration of GH-releasing hormone (GHRH; 1 microgram/kg iv) and arginine (ARG; 30 g infused over 30 min), a well known GH secretagogue probably acting via inhibition of hypothalamic somatostatin release, were studied in seven elderly normal subjects and seven young healthy subjects. Basal GH levels were similar in both groups, while insulin-like growth factor-I levels were lower in elderly subjects (76.7 +/- 9.2 vs. 258.3 +/- 29.2 micrograms/L; P = 0.01). In aged subjects GHRH induced a GH increase (area under the curve, 314.9 +/- 91.9 micrograms/L.h) which was lower (P = 0.01) than that in young subjects (709.1 +/- 114.4 micrograms/L.h). On the other hand, the ARG-induced GH increase in the elderly was not significantly different from that in young subjects (372.8 +/- 81.8 vs. 470.6 +/- 126.5 micrograms/L.h). ARG potentiated GH responsiveness to GHRH in both elderly (1787.1 +/- 226.0 micrograms/L.h; P = 0.0001 vs. GHRH alone) and young subjects (2113.0 +/- 444.3 micrograms/L.h; P = 0.001 vs. GHRH alone). The potentiating effect of ARG on the GHRH-induced GH response was greater in elderly than in young subjects (1013.0 +/- 553.5% vs. 237.9 +/- 79.1%; P = 0.0001); thus, the GH increase induced by combined administration of ARG and GHRH overlapped in two groups. In conclusion, these results show that, differently from the GHRH-induced GH increase, the somatotroph response to combined administration of ARG and GHRH does not vary with age. Our finding suggests that an increased somatostatinergic activity may underlie the reduced GH secretion in normal aging.     

Effects of sex and age on pyridostigmine potentiation of growth hormone-releasing hormone-induced growth hormone release.

Previous studies have shown that pyridostigmine (PD) is capable of increasing the growth hormone (GH) response to GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) in young healthy subjects. In order to investigate the influence of age and sex on the PD potentiation of GHRH-induced GH release, we have studied the GH response to GHRH (50 micrograms i.v.) 1 h after oral administration of placebo or PD (60 mg) in 8 young healthy men (aged 19-28 years) and 8 age-matched young women (aged 18-25 years) during the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle, as well as in 8 postmenopausal women (aged 57-62 years) and 8 age-matched elderly men (aged 56-64 years). In the same subjects the effect of PD alone (60 mg p.o.) was also studied. Furthermore, in 6 postmenopausal women and 6 elderly men, the effect of a 30-mg PD oral dose on GH secretion and GH response to GHRH was evaluated with a similar protocol. The GH responses (mean +/- SE) to GHRH + placebo were similar in young men (peak 20.1 +/- 2 ng/ml, AUC 1,250 +/- 113 ng/ml/min) and women (peak 29.3 +/- 2.3 ng/ml, AUC 1,769 +/- 305 ng/ml/min). PD 60 mg was capable of significantly increasing the GH response to GHRH in young men (peak 43.5 +/- 5.1 ng/ml, AUC 3,734 +/- 472 ng/ml/min, p less than 0.005) but not in women (peak 39 +/- 2.3 ng/ml, AUC 2,479 +/- 205 ng/ml/min).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Arginine potentiates but does not restore the blunted growth hormone response to growth hormone-releasing hormone in obesity.

A blunted growth hormone (GH) response to several stimuli, including growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH), has been shown in obesity. Arginine (ARG) has been demonstrated to potentiate the GHRH-induced GH increase in normal subjects, likely acting via inhibition of hypothalamic somatostatin release. To shed further light onto the mechanisms underlying the blunted GH secretion in obesity, we studied the effect of ARG (0.5 g/kg infused intravenously [IV] over 30 minutes) on both basal and GHRH (1 micron/kg IV)-stimulated GH secretion. Eight obese subjects (aged 26.4 +/- 3.9 years; body mass index, 39.0 +/- 1.9 kg/m2) and eight normal control volunteers (aged 27.0 +/- 1.7 years; body mass index, 22.3 +/- 0.5 kg/m2) were studied. In obese subjects, the GH response to both GHRH and ARG was lower (P less than .01 and P less than .002, respectively) than in controls. ARG potentiated the GH response to GHRH in obese patients (P less than .0003). However, in these patients, the GH secretion elicited by GHRH, even when coadministered with ARG, persisted at reduced levels (P less than .005) when compared with controls. Basal insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) levels did not significantly differ in obese subjects and in normal subjects (161.1 +/- 37.0 v 181.0 +/- 12.8 micrograms/L). In conclusion, ARG enhances the blunted GHRH-induced GH increase in obese patients, but the GH responses to ARG alone and to ARG + GHRH persist at lower levels than in normals. Thus, our results suggest the existence of a reduced pituitary GH pool in obesity.     

Effect of cholinergic tone on growth hormone-releasing hormone-induced secretion of growth hormone in normal aging.

Aging is associated with an impairment in the GH response to GHRH and to several other stimuli of GH secretion. We evaluated the effect of pyridostigmine (PD) or placebo pretreatment (Protocol A: placebo or 120 mg PD orally at 8 a.m.; Protocol B: placebo or 60 mg PD twice orally at 9 p.m. and 7 a.m.) on GH responsiveness to GHRH (1 micrograms/kg BW bolus i.v. at 9 a.m.) in 15 normal elderly males (65-92 years) and in 14 normal young adults (20-37 years). GH response to GHRH was significantly reduced in elderly subjects compared to young adults (p < 0.05). PD (Protocol A) increased GH release in both elderly and young subjects. In elderly men, PD enhanced GH response to GHRH. The phenomenon was more evident when PD was administered according to Protocol B (p < 0.01). The area under the curve of GH was significantly greater after PD plus GHRH than it was after placebo plus GHRH (p < 0.01). In young adults, PD induced an increase in GH responsiveness to GHRH when administered according to Protocol A (p < 0.05) but not Protocol B. Both GH peak and AUC of GH after PD plus GHRH (Protocols A and B) in elderly subjects were not significantly different from the same parameters found in young subjects after placebo plus GHRH. Our data confirm that pituitary somatotrophin responsiveness to GHRH in man changes with aging. PD restores GH responsiveness to GHRH in elderly subjects. The effect of PD on GH secretion suggests that cholinergic mechanisms may be involved in GH control in normal aging.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

GH/IGF-I axis in Prader-Willi syndrome: evaluation of IGF-I levels and of the somatotroph responsiveness to various provocative stimuli. Genetic Obesity Study Group of Italian Society of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology

Basal IGF-I levels and the GH response to at least two among provocative stimuli such as clonidine (CLO, Catapresan, 150 mcg/m2 p.o.), GHRH (1 mcg/kg i.v.)+arginine (ARG, 0.5 g/kg i.v. infusion during 30 min) and GHRH+pyridostigmine (PD, Mestinon cpr 60 mg p.o.) have been evaluated in 43 children with Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS, 17 males and 26 females, age 3-22 yr, 7 normal weight and 36 obese PWS), in 25 normal short children (NC, 17 males and 8 females, 7.7-18.5 yr) and in 24 children with simple obesity (OB, 14 males, 10 females, 7.7-21.5 yr). Both normal weight and obese PWS had mean IGF-I levels lower than those recorded in NC (p<0.001) and OB (p<0.001). The GH responses to GHRH+ARG and GHRH+PD in NC were similar and higher than that to CLO (p<0.001). In PWS the GH response to GHRH+ARG was higher than that to GHRH+PD (p<0.001) which, in turn, was higher than that to CLO (p<0.001); these responses in PWS were lower than those in normal children (p<0.02) and similar to those in OB. In normal weight PWS the GH responses to GHRH+ARG and to GHRH+PD were similar and higher than to CLO (p<0.05); however, each provocative stimulus elicited a GH rise lower than that in NC (p<0.05). In obese PWS as well as in OB the GH response to GHRH+ARG was higher than that to GHRH+PD (p<0.02) which, in turn, was higher than that to CLO (p<0.001); all GH responses in obese PWS and OB were lower than those in NC (p<0.001) but similar to those in normal weight PWS. In conclusion, patients with PWS show clear reduction of IGF-I levels as well as of the somatotroph responsiveness to provocative stimuli independently of body weight excess. These results strengthen the hypothesis that PWS syndrome is frequently connotated by GH insufficiency.     

Sequential administration of arginine and arginine plus GHRH to test somatotroph function in short children

The hormonal diagnosis of GH deficiency in childhood is conventionally based on the GH response to at least two provocative stimuli. Among these, arginine (ARG) has long been considered a classical, centrally mediated stimulus of GH secretion. ARG is also able to potentiate the GH response to GHRH, likely inhibiting hypothalamic somatostatin; this combined test is one of the most potent to explore the maximal secretory capacity of somatotroph cells. Based on these premises, we verified whether the sequential administration of ARG and ARG+GHRH could be feasible as single step provocative test to evaluate the GH releasable pool in short children. To this goal, 48 normal short children (35 M and 13 F, 12.0+/-0.4 yr, PS 1: 255 II-IV: 23) underwent a test with ARG (0.5 g/kg i.v. from 0 to +30 min) followed by a coadministration of ARG (from +120 to 150 min) plus GHRH (1 microg/kg i.v. at +120 min). ARG alone elicited a clear GH response (mean peak vs baseline: 12.1+/-1.7 vs 2.0+/-0.4 microg/l, p<0.001, Cmax range 12-51.0 microg/l). Following this GH rise, the hormonal levels at +120 min approached to baseline levels (4.2+/-0.8 microg/l) but then showed marked response to the coadministration of ARG+GHRH. The GH peak following ARG+GHRH (mean peak: 47.8+/-3.3 microg/l, p<0.001; Cmax 22.4-150.0 microg/l) was clearly higher (p<0.001) than that recorded after ARG alone. The GH responses to both ARG and ARG+GHRH were independent of gender, puberty, height velocity, body mass index (BMI) and IGF-I levels. Nine normal short children (16%) had GH peaks lower than 7 microg/l after ARG alone, while none showed GH peak below 20 microg/l after ARG+GHRH. Thus, ARG alone is a good stimulus of GH secretion but false positive responses frequently occur in normal short children. ARG+GHRH is a more potent stimulus giving no false positive responses even after previous challenge with ARG alone. Testing with sequential administration of ARG and ARG+GHRH may allow the single step evaluation of the somatotroph response to central and pituitary stimuli in short children.     

Low dose hexarelin and growth hormone (GH)-releasing hormone as a diagnostic tool for the diagnosis of GH deficiency in adults: comparison with insulin-induced hypoglycemia test.

GH deficiency (GHD) in adults must be shown by provocative testing of GH secretion. Insulin-induced hypoglycemia (ITT) is the test of choice, and severe GHD, treated with recombinant human GH replacement, is defined by a GH peak response to ITT of less than 3 microg/L. GHRH plus arginine (ARG) is a more provocative test and is as sensitive as ITT provided that appropriate cut-off limits are assumed. GH secretagogues are a family of peptidyl and nonpeptidyl GH-releasing molecules that strongly stimulate GH secretion and, even at low doses, truly synergize with GHRH. Our aim was to verify the diagnostic reliability of the hexarelin (HEX; 0.25 microg/kg, iv) and GHRH (1 microg/kg, iv) test for the diagnosis of adult GHD. To this goal, in the present study we 1) defined the normal ranges of the GH response to GHRH+HEX in a group of normal young adult volunteers (NS; n = 25; 18 men and 7 women; age, 28.5+/-0.6 yr) and in 11 of them verified its reproducibility in a second session, and 2) compared the GH response to GHRH+HEXwith that to ITT in a group of normal subjects (n = 33; 12 men and 21 women; age, 34.1+/-1.5 yr) and hypopituitaric adults with GHD (n = 19; 10 men and 9 women; age, 39.9+/-2.2 yr; GH peak <5 microg/L after ITT). The GH response to GHRH+ARG was also evaluated in all GHD and in 77 normal subjects (40 men and 37 women; age, 28.1+/-0.6 yr). The mean GH peak after GHRH+HEX in NS was 83.6+/-4.5 microg/L; the third and first percentile limits of the normal GH response were 55.5 and 51.2 microg/L, respectively). The GH response to GHRH+HEX in NS showed good intraindividual reproducibility. In GHD the mean GH peak after GHRH+HEX (2.6+/-0.7 microg/L) was similar to that after GHRH+ARG (3.6+/-1.0 microg/L), and both were higher (P < 0.001) than that after ITT (0.6+/-0.1 microg/L); the GH responses to GHRH+HEX were positively associated with those to ITT and GHRH+ARG. Analyzing individual GH responses, 100% had severe GHD after ITT (GH peak, <3 microg/L). After GHRH+HEX all GHD had GH peaks below the third percentile limit of normality appropriate for this test (i.e. 55.5 microg/L). Thirteen of 19 (68.4%) GHD subjects had GH peaks below 3 microg/L after GHRH+HEX but all 19 (100%) had GH peaks below the first percentile limit of normality (i.e. 51.2 microg/L). The GH responses to GHRH+HEX were highly concordant with those after GHRH+ARG. In conclusion, the present results define normal limits of the GH response to stimulation with low dose HEX+GHRH in normal adults and show that this test is as sensitive as ITT for the diagnosis of adult GHD provided that appropriate cut-off limits are considered.     

Retesting young adults with childhood-onset growth hormone (GH) deficiency with GH-releasing-hormone-plus-arginine test

Within an appropriate clinical context, severe GH deficiency (GHD) in adults has to be defined biochemically by provocative testing of GH secretion. Patients with childhood-onset GHD need retesting in late adolescence or young adulthood to verify whether they have to continue recombinant human GH treatment. GHRH + arginine (GHRH+ARG) is the most reliable alternative to the insulin-induced hypoglycemia test (ITT) as a provocative test for the diagnosis of GHD in adulthood, provided that appropriate cut-off limits are assumed (normal limits, 16.5 microg/L as 3rd and 9.0 microg/L as 1st centile). We studied the GH response to a single GHRH (1 microg/kg iv) + ARG (0.5 g/kg iv) test in 62 young patients who had undergone GH replacement in childhood, based on the following diagnosis: 1) organic hypopituitarism with GHD (oGHD) In = 18: 15 male (M), 3 female (F); age, 26.8+/-2.2 yr; GH peak < 10 microg/L after two classical tests]; 2) idiopathic isolated GHD (iGHD) [n = 23 (15 M, 8 F); age, 23.0+/-1.5 yr; GH peak < 10 microg/L after two classical tests]; and 3) GH neurosecretory dysfunction (GHNSD) [n = 21 (10 M, 11 F); age, 25.1+/-1.6 yr; GH peak > 10 microg/L after classical test but mGHc < 3 microg/L]. The GH responses to GHRH+ARG in these groups were also compared with that recorded in a group of age-matched normal subjects (NS) [n = 48 (20 M, 28 F); age, 27.7+/-0.8 yr]. Insulin-like growth factor I levels in oGHD subjects (61.5+/-13.7 microg/L) were lower (P < 0.001) than those in iGHD subjects (117.2+/-13.1 microg/L); the latter were lower than those in GHNSD subjects (210.2+/-12.9 microg/L), which, in turn, were similar to those in NS (220.9+/-7.1 microg/L). The mean GH peak after GHRH+ARG in oGHD (2.8+/-0.8 microg/L) was lower (P < 0.001) than that in iGHD (18.6+/-4.7 microg/L), which, in turn, was clearly lower (P < 0.001) than that in GHNSD (31.3+/-1.6 microg/L). The GH response in GHNSD was lower than that in NS (65.9+/-5.5 microg/L), but this difference did not attain statistical significance. With respect to the 3rd centile limit of GH response in young adults (i.e. 16.5 microg/L), retesting confirmed GHD in all oGHD, in 65.2% of iGHD, and in none of the GHNSD subjects. With respect to the 1st centile limit of GH response (i.e. 9.0 microg/L), retesting demonstrated severe GHD in 94% oGHD and in 52.1% of iGHD. All oGHD and iGHD with GH peak after GHRH+ARG lower than 9 microg/L had also GH peak lower than 3 microg/L after ITT. In the patients in whom GHD was confirmed by retesting, the mean GH peak after GHRH+ARG was higher than that after ITT (3.4+/-0.5 vs. 1.9+/-0.4). In conclusion, given appropriate cut-off limits, GHRH+ARG is as reliable as ITT for retesting patients who had undergone GH treatment in childhood. Among these patients, severe GHD in adulthood is generally confirmed in oGHD, is frequent in iGHD, but never occurs in GHNSD.     

ARGININE POTENTIATES THE GHRH- BUT NOT THE PYRIDOSTIGMINE-INDUCED GH SECRETION IN NORMAL SHORT CHILDREN. FURTHER EVIDENCE FOR A SOMATOSTATIN SUPPRESSING EFFECT OF ARGININE

To investigate the mechanism underlying the GH-releasing effect of arginine (ARG), we studied the interactions of ARG (0.5 g/kg infused i.v. over 30 min) with GHRH (1 microgram/kg i.v.) and with pyridostigmine (PD, 60 mg orally) on GH secretion in 15 children and adolescents with familial short stature (5.1-15.4 years). In a group of eight subjects ARG induced a GH increase not statistically different to that observed after GHRH (peak, mean +/- SEM: 38.0 +/- 10.4 vs 64.0 +/- 14.4 mU/l). The combined administration of ARG and GHRH led to GH levels (101 +/- 15.2 mU/l) higher than those observed after GHRH (P less than 0.025) or ARG alone (P less than 0.001) and overlapping with those recorded after combined PD and GHRH administration (111 +/- 22.4 mU/l). In the other seven subjects, ARG and PD administration induced a similar GH response either when administered alone (25.2 +/- 13.6 and 27.8 +/- 4.0 mU/l, respectively) or in combination (33.8 +/- 5.4 mU/l). In conclusion, our results show that in children ARG administration potentiates GHRH- but not PD-induced GH increase. These findings agree with the hypothesis that the GH-releasing effect of both ARG and PD is mediated via the same mechanism, namely, by suppression of endogeneous somatostatin release. Combined administration of either ARG or PD with GHRH has a similar striking GH-releasing effect which is clearly higher than that of GHRH alone.     

Activation of cholinergic tone by pyridostigmine reverses the inhibitory effect of corticotropin-releasing hormone on the growth hormone-releasing hormone-induced growth hormone secretion.

Previous studies have shown that corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) is capable of inhibiting growth hormone (GH) secretion in response to GH-releasing hormone (GHRH). In an attempt to clarify the mechanism of the CRH action, we have studied the effect of enhanced cholinergic tone induced by pyridostigmine on the CRH inhibition of the GH response to GHRH in a group of six normal men and six normal women. All subjects presented a normal GH response to 50 micrograms i.v. GHRH administration (mean peak +/- SEM plasma GH levels 20 +/- 2.9 micrograms/l in men and 28.9 +/- 2.9 micrograms/l in women) with a further significant increase after pyridostigmine pretreatment (60 mg orally given 60 min before GHRH) in men (GH peaks 43.1 +/- 6.9 micrograms/l, p less than 0.005) but not in women (GH peaks 39.2 +/- 3.0 micrograms/l). In the same subjects, peripherally injected CRH (100 micrograms) significantly inhibited the GH response to GHRH (GH peaks 8.1 +/- 0.6 micrograms/l in men, p less than 0.005 and 9.9 +/- 0.7 micrograms/l in women, p less than 0.005). Pyridostigmine (60 mg) given orally at the same time of CRH administration (60 min before GHRH) reversed the CRH inhibition of GHRH-induced GH secretion (GH peaks 35.3 +/- 8.2 micrograms/l in men and 35 +/- 3.3 micrograms/l in women) with a response not significantly different to that seen in the pyridostigmine plus GHRH test. Our data confirm that pyridostigmine is capable of potentiating the GHRH-induced GH release in normal male but not female subjects.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Activation of cholinergic neurotransmission by pyridostigmine reverses the inhibitory effect of hyperglycemia on growth hormone (GH) releasing hormone-induced GH secretion in man: does acute hyperglycemia act through hypothalamic release of somatostatin?

Acute hyperglycemia blocks growth hormone (GH) secretion in response to provocative stimuli including growth hormone releasing hormone (GHRH) administration. However, the precise mechanism of glucose action is unknown. To determine if enhanced somatostatinergic stimulation accounts for the decreased GH secretion, we studied the effect of enhanced cholinergic tone by pyridostigmine on the hyperglycemia blockade of GH release in 7 normal subjects. Pyridostigmine, an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, has been postulated as an inhibitor of somatostatin release. Each subject underwent 4 tests with GHRH injection (100 micrograms i.v. at 0 min). In the first (control) test, placebo was administered before GHRH. In the second test, 100 g of glucose was administered p.o. 45 min before GHRH. In the third test, pyridostigmine, 120 mg p.o., was administered 60 min before GHRH, and in the fourth test, pyridostigmine, glucose and GHRH were administered at -60, -45 and 0 min, respectively. GHRH-induced GH secretion of 25.8 +/- 4.5 ng/ml was significantly reduced by previous glucose administration (12.1 +/- 4.5 ng/ml) and significantly potentiated by previous pyridostigmine pretreatment (56.5 +/- 16.8 ng/ml). In the fourth test (pyridostigmine plus glucose plus GHRH) the GH peak of 42.4 +/- 9.2 ng/ml was significantly higher than after GHRH alone and not different to the pyridostigmine-GHRH test. In conclusion, central cholinergic activation by pyridostigmine reversed the hyperglycemic blockade of GHRH-induced GH secretion. In addition, hyperglycemia was unable to reduce the potentiating effect of pyridostigmine on GH secretion elicited by GHRH. Based on the reported actions of pyridostigmine, acute hyperglycemia might act over GH release by inducing hypothalamic somatostatin release.     

Effect of cholinergic enhancement by pyridostigmine on growth hormone secretion in obese adults and children

In obesity the reduced growth hormone (GH) responses to several provocative stimuli including growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) indicate a diminished somatotroph responsiveness but do not distinguish between primary pituitary and hypothalamic pathogenesis. However, it has been shown that the cholinergic system positively influences Gh secretion likely by modulating somatostatin release in a negative way. Thus, the effect of cholinergic activity enhancement by pyridostigmine (PD), an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, on both basal and GHRH-induced GH secretion was studied in 14 obese subjects (eight adults and six children). Eighteen nonobese subjects (seven adults and 11 children) were studied as controls. In obese subjects the GHRH-induced GH increase was lower than in controls (peak, mean +/- SEM, adults, 9.2 +/- 2.7 v 16.8 +/- 5.7 ng/mL; children, 8.0 +/- 0.8 v 20.3 +/- 4.6 ng/mL) attaining statistical significance only in children group (P less than .02). The PD-induced GH response in the two obese groups was similar to that observed in relative controls (adults, 5.3 +/- 1.0 v 7.4 +/- 1.7 ng/mL; children, 9.6 +/- 1.6 v 13.3 +/- 1.4 ng/mL). PD clearly potentiated the GH response to GHRH in obese subjects, both adults (P less than .05 v GHRH alone) and children (P less than .0005 v GHRH alone). However, the GH responses to PD + GHRH was significantly reduced in obese subjects compared with controls (adults, 18.1 +/- 2.2 v 42.7 +/- 10.7 ng/mL, P less than .05; children, 28.3 +/- 4.5 v 58.2 +/- 7.7 ng/mL, P less than .01). In conclusion, PD is able to potentiate the blunted GH responses to GHRH in obese adults and children, inducing a GH increase similar to that observed after GHRH alone in normal subjects. This finding suggests that an alteration of somatostatinergic tone could be involved in the reduced GH secretion in obesity.     

Impairment of GH secretion in adults with primary empty sella

Primary empty sella (PES) is generally not associated with overt endocrine abnormalities, although mild hyperprolactinemia and, in children, deficient GH secretion have been reported. The aim of this multi-center collaborative study was to evaluate basal and stimulated GH secretion in a large series of adult PES patients. The study group consisted of 51 patients [41 women and 10 men, age range: 20-78 yr; (mean+/-SD) 47+/-11 yr]; results were compared with those in normal subjects (Ns) (Ns: no.=110, 55 women, age: 20-50 yr, 37+/-14 yr), and in hypopituitaric patients (HYP) with GH deficiency (HYP: no.=44,17 women, age: 20-72, 49+/-16 yr). Baseline IGF-I levels and GH responses to insulin-induced hypoglycemia (insulin tolerance test, ITT) and/or GHRH+arginine (ARG) stimulation tests were evaluated. PES patients were also subdivided according to BMI in lean (BMI <28 kg/M2 no.=22) or obese (BMI >28 kg/m2 no.=29). PES patients had serum total IGF-I concentrations (mean+/-SE: 142.2+/-9.6 ng/ml) higher than HYP patients (77.4+/-6.4 ng/ml, p<0.001), but lower than Ns (213.3+/-17.2 ng/ml, p<0.005), with no differences between lean and obese PES subjects. The increase in serum GH concentrations following ITT and/or GHRH+ARG stimulation tests, although higher than that observed in HYP patients, was markedly reduced with respect to Ns. No difference was observed in the GH response to provocative tests between lean and obese PES patients. When individual GH responses to ITT or GHRH+ARG were taken into account, a large proportion of PES patients (52% after ITT, 61% after GHRH+ARG) showed a GH peak increase below the 1st centile of normal limits. Serum IGF-I levels in PES patients with blunted GH responses to provocative tests were significantly (p<0.001) lower in PES patients with normal GH responses, and a positive correlation was observed between IGF-I levels and serum GH peak concentrations after GHRH+ARG. In conclusion, the results of the present study provide evidence that adult PES patients often have an impairment of GH secretion, as indicated by the blunted GH response to ITT and GHRH+ARG provocative tests, and by the reduction in serum IGF-I levels. These changes are independent of body mass.     

Pyridostigmine partially restores the GH responsiveness to GHRH in normal aging

In 11 elderly normal subjects and in 17 young healthy subjects we studied the response of plasma growth hormone to GH-releasing hormone (GHRH(29), 1 microgram/kg iv) alone and preceded by pyridostigmine (120 mg orally 60 min before GHRH), a cholinesterase inhibitor likely able to suppress somatostatin release. The GH response to pyridostigmine alone was also examined. Basal plasma GH levels were similar in elderly and young subjects. In the elderly, GHRH induced a GH rise (AUC, median and range: 207.5, 43.5-444.0 micrograms.l-1.h-1) which was lower (p = 0.006) than that observed in young subjects (548.0, 112.5-2313.5 micrograms.l-1.h-1). The pyridostigmine-induced GH rise in the elderly was similar to that in young subjects (300.5, 163.0-470.0 vs 265.0, 33.0-514.5 micrograms.l-1.h-1). Pyridostigmine potentiated the GH responsiveness to GHRH in both elderly (437.5, 152.0-1815.5 micrograms.l-1.h-1; p = 0.01 vs GHRH alone) and young subjects (2140.0, 681.5-4429.5 micrograms.l-1.h-1; p = 0.0001 vs GHRH alone). However, the GH response to pyridostigmine + GHRH was significantly lower (p = 0.0001) in elderly than in young subjects. In conclusion, the cholinergic enhancement by pyridostigmine is able to potentiate the blunted GH response to GHRH in elderly subjects, inducing a GH increase similar to that observed after GHRH alone in young adults. This finding suggests that an alteration of somatostatinergic tone could be involved in the reduced GH secretion in normal aging. However, a decreased GH response to combined administration of pyridostigmine and GHRH in elderly subjects suggests that other abnormalities may coexist, leading to the secretory hypoactivity of somatotropes.     

Arginine counteracts the inhibitory effect of recombinant human insulin-like growth factor I on the somatotroph responsiveness to growth hormone-releasing hormone in humans

Insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) exerts a negative feedback effect on GH secretion via either direct actions at the pituitary level or indirect ones at the hypothalamic level, through stimulation of somatostatin (SS) and/or inhibition of GHRH release. In fact, recombinant human IGF-I (rhIGF-I) in humans inhibits spontaneous GH secretion as well as the GH response to GHRH and even more to GH/GH-releasing peptides, whose main action is on the hypothalamus, antagonizing SS and enhancing GHRH activity. The aim of the present study was to further clarify in humans the mechanisms underlying IGF-I-induced inhibition of somatotroph secretion. In six normal young volunteers (all women; mean +/- SEM: age, 28.3+/-1.2 yr; body mass index, 21.3+/-1.2 kg/m2) we studied the GH response to GHRH (1 microg/kg, iv, at 0 min), both alone and combined with arginine (ARG; 0.5 g/kg, iv, from 0-30 min), which probably acts via inhibition of hypothalamic SS release, after pretreatment with rhIGF-I (20 microg/kg, sc, at -180 min) or placebo. rhIGF-I increased circulating IGF-I levels (peak at -60 vs. -180 min: 54.9+/-3.9 vs. 35.9+/-3.3 mmol/L; P < 0.05) to a reproducible extent, and these levels remained stable and within the normal range until 90 min. The mean GH concentration over 3 h (from -180 to 0 min) before ARG and/or GHRH was not modified by placebo or rhIGF-I. After placebo, the GH response to GHRH (peak, 23.6+/-2.9 microg/L) was strikingly enhanced (P < 0.05) by ARG coadministration (69.6+/-9.9 microg/L). rhIGF-I blunted the GH response to GHRH (13.1+/-4.5 microg/L; P < 0.05), whereas that to GHRH plus ARG was not modified (59.5+/-8.9 microg/L), although it occurred with some delay. Mean glucose and insulin concentrations were not modified by either placebo or rhIGF-I. In conclusion, ARG counteracts the inhibitory effect of rhIGF-I on somatotroph responsiveness to GHRH in humans. These findings suggest that the acute inhibitory effect of rhIGF-I on the GH response to GHRH takes place on the hypothalamus, possibly via enhancement of SS release, and that ARG overrides this action.     

Comparisons among old and new provocative tests of GH secretion in 178 normal adults

Classical provocative stimuli of GH secretion such as insulin-induced hypoglycaemia, arginine, clonidine, glucagon and levodopa have been widely used in clinical practice for approximately 30 years. On the other hand, in the last 10 years new potent stimuli of GH secretion have been proposed, but an extensive comparison with the classical ones has rarely been performed, at least in adults. In order to compare the GH-releasing activity of old and new provocative stimuli of GH secretion, and to define the normative values of the GH response, in 178 normal adults (95 males, 83 females; age range: 20-50 years, all within +/-15% of their ideal body weight), we studied the GH response to: insulin-induced hypoglycaemia (ITT, 0.1IU/kg i.v.), arginine (ARG, 0.5g/kg i.v.), clonidine (CLO, 300 microg/kg p.o.), glucagon (GLU, 1mg i.m.), pyridostigmine (PD, 120mg p.o.), galanin (GAL, 80pmol/kg per min), GH-releasing hormone (GHRH, 1 microg/kg i.v.), GHRH+ARG, GHRH+PD, hexarelin, a GH-releasing protein (HEX, 2 microg/kg i.v.) and GHRH+HEX (0.25 microg/kg i.v.). The mean (+/-s.e.m.) peak GH response to ITT (21.8+/-2.8, range: 3.0-84.0 microg/l) was similar to those to ARG (18.0+/-1.6, range: 2.9-39.5 microg/l) or GLU (20. 5+/-2.2, range: 10.6-36.9 microg/l) which, in turn, were higher (P<0. 001) than those to CLO (8.2+/-1.6, range: 0.3-21.5 microg/l), PD (9. 6+/-1.1, range: 2.2-33.0 microg/l) and GAL (9.3+/-1.1, range: 3.9-18. 3 microg/l). The GH response to GHRH (19.1+/-1.5, range: 2.7-55.0 microg/l) was similar to those after ITT, ARG or GLU but clearly lower than those after GHRH+ARG (65.9+/-5.5, range: 13.8-171.0 microg/l) and GHRH+PD (50.2+/-4.6, range: 17.7-134.5 microg/l) which, in turn, were similar. The GH response to HEX (55.3+/-5.5, range: 13.9-163.5 microg/l) was similar to those after GHRH+ARG and GHRH+PD but lower (P<0.001) than that after GHRH+HEX (86.0+/-4.3, range: 49. 0-125.0 microg/l) which was the most potent stimulus of GH secretion. In this adult population the third centile limits of peak GH response to various stimuli were the following: ITT: 5.3; ARG: 2.9; CLO: 1.5; GLU: 7.6; PD: 2.2; GAL: 4.0; GHRH: 5.0; GHRH+ARG: 17.8; GHRH+PD: 17.9; HEX: 21.6; GHRH+HEX: 57.1. These results confirm that, among classical provocative tests of GH secretion, ITT followed by ARG and GLU are the most potent ones and possess clear limits of normality. GHRH+ARG or PD and HEX are strong stimuli of GH secretion which, however, is maximally stimulated by a combination of GHRH and a low dose of HEX. It is recommended that each test is used with appropriate cut-off limits.     

Effect of acute reduction of free fatty acids by acipimox on growth hormone-releasing hormone-induced GH secretion in type 1 diabetic patients

BACKGROUND: In type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM1), high GH basal levels and exaggerated responses to several stimuli have been described. Acipimox is an antilipolytic drug that produces an acute reduction of free fatty acids (FFA). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the reduction of plasma FFA with acipimox, alone or in combination with GHRH, on GH secretion in DM1. METHODS: Six type 1 diabetic patients were studied (three women, three men), mean age of 30 +/- 2.1 years, body mass index (BMI) 23.1 +/- 1.5 kg/m2. As a control group, six normal healthy subjects of similar age, sex and weight were studied. Each patient and control received GHRH [1 microg/kg intravenously (i.v.) at min 180], acipimox (250 mg orally at min 0 and 120) and GHRH plus acipimox on three separated days. Subjects served as their own control. Blood samples were taken at appropriate intervals for determination of GH, FFA and glucose. RESULT: In control subjects, the GH area under the curve (AUC; microg/l x 120 min) was for acipimox-treated 1339 +/- 292 and 1528 +/- 330 for GHRH-induced secretion. The GH AUC after the administration of GHRH plus acipimox was 3031 +/- 669, significantly greater than the response after acipimox alone (P<0.05) or GHRH alone (P<0.05). In diabetic patients, the GH AUC was for acipimox-treated 2516 +/- 606 and 1821 +/- 311 for GHRH-induced secretion. The GH AUC after the administration of GHRH plus acipimox was 7311 +/- 1154, significantly greater than the response after acipimox alone (P<0.05) or GHRH alone (P<0.05). The GH response after acipimox was increased in diabetic when compared with normal (P<0.05), with a GH AUC of 1339 +/- 292 and 2515 +/- 606 for normal subjects and diabetic patients, respectively. The GH response after acipimox plus GHRH was increased in diabetic when compared with normal (P<0.05), with a GH AUC of 3031 +/- 669 and 7311 +/- 1154 for normal subjects and diabetic patients, respectively. The administration of acipimox induced a FFA reduction during the entire test. CONCLUSIONS: Reduction of free fatty acids with acipimox is a stimulus for GH secretion in DM1. The combined administration of GHRH plus acipimox induces a markedly increased GH secretion in type 1 diabetic patients when compared with normal subjects. These data suggest that patients with DM1 exhibit a greater GH secretory capacity than control subjects, despite the fact that endogenous FFA levels seems to exert a greater inhibitory effect on GH secretion in these patients.     

Depending on the time of administration, dexamethasone potentiates or blocks growth hormone-releasing hormone-induced growth hormone release in man

In humans, corticoids suppress growth hormone (GH) secretion elicited by a variety of stimuli, while in vitro they potentiate GH release. To further study this problem, the effect of two doses of dexamethasone on GH secretion elicited by GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) in 6 normal volunteers was studied. Each subject underwent three tests, on 3 separate days with GHRH 1-29 (1 microgram/kg i.v. at 12.00 h). On the control day, only GHRH was given, on the second day dexamethasone 4 mg i.v. was administered at 09.00 h (3 h before GHRH) and on the third day dexamethasone 8 mg p.o. was given 12 h before GHRH (at 00.00 h). The GHRH-induced GH peak was 9.9 +/- 2.0 ng/ml, while 4 mg dexamethasone significantly (p less than 0.05) potentiated GH secretion elicited by GHRH (29.2 +/- 5.7 ng/ml). When dexamethasone 8 mg was given 12 h before, GHRH-induced GH secretion was completely blocked (3.0 +/- 1.1 ng/ml) (p less than 0.05). These results indicate that corticoids have two different actions: an acute potentiating activity on GHRH, and a delayed blocking action on GHRH-induced GH secretion.     

Re-assessment of growth hormone secretion in young adult patients with childhood-onset growth hormone deficiency

OBJECTIVE: Patients with childhood-onset GH deficiency (coGHD) need retesting in late adolescence or young adulthood to verify whether they need to continue GH treatment. For this purpose the Growth Hormone Research Society (GRS) recommends the insulin tolerance test (ITT), or as an alternative the arginine + growth hormone releasing hormone test (ARG + GHRH test) as a diagnostic tool in adolescents and adults. However, there are no standardized cut-off levels based on normal GH secretion for determining GHD vs. GH sufficiency in young adults for the ITT, the ARG + GHRH test or the pyridostigmine + GHRH (PD + GHRH) test, a further new GH stimulation test. PATIENTS AND MEASUREMENTS: We studied 43 patients (28 with organic coGHD, 15 with idiopathic coGHD; 30 males, 13 females; aged 20.4 years, range 16.2-25.4; body mass index 23.5, range 16.3-35.8) using the ARG [0.5 g/kg intravenously (i.v.)] + GHRH (1 micro g/kg i.v.) test, the PD (120 mg orally) + GHRH (1 micro g/kg i.v.) test and the ITT (0.1 IU/kg i.v.) and compared these data with the results of 40 healthy age- and weight-matched volunteers. RESULTS: The GH response in patients was significantly lower than in healthy controls: ARG + GHRH test, 0.8 micro g/l (interquartile range 0.3-2.6) vs. 51.8 micro g/l (32.6-71.2) in controls (P < 0.0001); PD + GHRH test, 0.9 micro g/l (0.3-1.9) vs. 40.4 micro g/l (27.1-54.4) in controls (P < 0.0001); ITT, 0.1 micro g/l (0.0-0.8) vs. 20.3 micro g/l (14.7-31.7) in controls (P < 0.0001). In the ARG + GHRH test we found a diagnostic sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 97.5% for a cut-off range from 15.1 to 20.3 micro g/l, in the PD + GHRH test a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 97% (cut-off range 9.1-13.1 micro g/l) and in the ITT a sensitivity and specificity of 100% each within a cut-off range from 2.7 to 8.8 micro g/l. CONCLUSION: There were no marked differences in sensitivity and specificity in young adults among ARG + GHRH test, PD + GHRH test and the ITT in assessing GH secretion. Because of the lack of side-effects, the ARG + GHRH test is the recommended method for re-evaluation of coGHD in young adults when pituitary GHD is suspected. Furthermore, in adult patient groups where organic pituitary coGHD is common, the ITT may be completely replaced by the ARG + GHRH test. Because of the predominance of hypothalamic GHD in childhood, the ITT is commonly performed for the re-evaluation of patients with childhood-onset GHD because of its mechanism of GH stimulation. The present results confirm the high discriminatory capability of the ITT in young adults.     

Effect of withdrawal of somatostatin plus GH-releasing hormone as a stimulus of GH secretion in obesity

OBJECTIVES: Somatostatin (SS) may not merely be inhibitory to GH secretion but, under appropriate temporal conditions, may act in a paradoxically positive manner to sensitize somatotroph responsiveness to GH-releasing hormone (GHRH). SS infusion withdrawal (SSIW) produces a rebound GH rise in humans and increases GHRH-induced GH release. Theoretically, SSIW leaves the somatotroph cell in a situation of low endogenous SS. In obesity, there is markedly decreased GH secretion. In both children and adults, the greater the body mass index (BMI), the lower the GH response to provocative stimuli. It has been postulated that increased hypothalamic somatostatin secretion is the main mechanism responsible for the blunted GH secretion of obesity. There are no data evaluating GH responsiveness to SSIW plus GHRH in obese adults. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the GH response to SSIW plus GHRH in a group of control subjects and a group of obese patients. PATIENTS AND MEASUREMENTS: Seven obese patients (six female, one male) with a BMI of 36.1 +/- 7.7 kg/m2 were studied. As a control group, seven normal subjects (six female, one male) with a BMI of 20.3 +/- 0.9 kg/m2 were also studied. Two tests were performed. On one day, somatostatin (SS) i.v. infusion (500 microg from 0-90 min) was performed followed by a placebo i.v. bolus 90 min after SS withdrawal (SSIW). On another day, SS i.v. infusion (500 microg from 0-90 min) was performed followed by a GHRH (100 microg) i.v. bolus 90 min after SS withdrawal. A second group of seven obese patients (six female, one male) with a BMI of 32.2 +/- 2.3 kg/m2 were studied. As a second control group, seven normal healthy subjects (six female, one male) with a BMI of 20.1 +/- 0.6 kg/m2 were also studied. On one day, saline infusion was performed followed by a placebo i.v. bolus at 90 min. On another day, saline infusion was performed followed by a GHRH (100 microg) i.v. bolus at 90 min. Blood samples were taken at appropriate intervals for determination of GH. Serum GH was measured by chemiluminescent immunometric assay. Statistical analysis was performed by Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney tests. RESULTS: GHRH-induced GH secretion in normal subjects showed a mean peak of 15.8 +/- 2.1 microg/l. Normal control subjects had a mean peak of 3.1 +/- 1.5 microg/l after SSIW-induced GH secretion. When GHRH was administered after SSIW there was an increased GH secretion with a mean peak of 23.3 +/- 4.4 microg/l, significantly greater than the response after SSIW alone (P < 0.05) and GHRH alone (P < 0.05). GHRH-induced GH secretion in obese patients was decreased with a mean peak of 3.9 +/- 1.5 microg/l. In obese patients, GH secretion after SSIW was markedly decreased with a mean peak of 1.0 +/- 0.4 microg/l. When GHRH was administered after SSIW, an increase in GH secretion was observed with a mean peak of 4.3 +/- 0.9 microg/l, significantly greater than SSIW alone (P < 0.05) but not GHRH alone (P = NS), and significantly less than in normal subjects (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates a significantly blunted peak GH response to somatostatin infusion withdrawal plus GHRH in obese patients compared to normal subjects. In this theoretical situation of decreased somatostatinergic tone, there is persistence of GH hyposecretion in obesity, suggesting the existence of multiple defects responsible for decreased GH secretion in obesity. We also found that in obese patients, in contrast to normal subjects, SSIW did not increase GHRH-induced GH secretion.