A longitudinal evaluation of anti‐FVIII antibodies demonstrated IgG4 subclass is mainly correlated with high‐titre inhibitor in haemophilia A patients

The development of inhibitory antibodies against factor VIII (FVIII) (inhibitor) is the major complication in haemophilia A patients. The FVIII‐binding antibodies development comprises a polyclonal immunoglobulin (Ig) G response. Recent studies showed strong correlation between the presence of neutralizing anti‐FVIII antibodies (inhibitors) and IgG4 subclass. The aim of this study was to evaluate anti‐FVIII IgG subclasses in haemophilia A patients with inhibitor both in a cross‐sectional and in a longitudinal analysis. Inhibitors were determined by Nijmegen–Bethesda assay. Anti‐FVIII IgG subclasses were performed by ELISA, and samples from 20 healthy individuals were used to validate the test. We studied 25 haemophilia A patients with inhibitor, previously treated exclusively with plasma‐derived FVIII concentrates or bypassing agents. The IgG subclasses distributions were evaluated in two groups of patients classified according to inhibitor response. IgG1 and IgG4 antibodies were most prominent in haemophilia A patients with inhibitors when compared with IgG2 and IgG3. This study reports for the first time the behaviour of FVIII‐binding IgG1 and IgG4 subclasses in a longitudinal analysis, in a clinical setting, of high‐response inhibitor haemophilia A patients, showing the correlation of IgG4 and the inhibitor titres. In spite of being considered a non‐pathologic antibody subclass with anti‐inflammatory properties in other situations, IgG4 is correlated with the presence of high‐titre inhibitor in the haemophilia setting. The comprehension of the IgG4 role in immune response may be crucial to establish the process for designing specific tolerance to FVIII.     

Evaluation of a novel ELISA screening test for detection of factor VIII inhibitory antibodies in haemophiliacs.

Treatment of patients with haemophilia A with coagulation factor concentrates may result in the development of inhibitory antibodies directed against factor VIII (FVIII). In this study, a previously unpublished ELISA test for FVIII inhibitor screening (Genetic Testing Institute [GTI] FVIII inhibitor, Brookfield, WI, USA) was evaluated in 131 blood samples (124 samples from patients with haemophilia A, and seven serial samples from one patient with an acquired FVIII inhibitor). Comparisons were made with the routine screening assay (based on recovery of FVIII) and confirmed where positive (< 90% recovery) with the New Oxford assay. The ELISA kit had a sensitivity of 97.7% and specificity of 78.4%. The high negative predictive value of this new test (98.6%) suggests it may be useful as a reliable, rapid (< 2 h) and flexible (microwell strip format) tool for inhibitor screening of samples from both patients with haemophilia A and those with suspected acquired FVIII inhibitors.     

Evaluation of a novel ELISA screening test for detection of factor VIII inhibitory antibodies in haemophiliacs

Treatment of patients with haemophilia A with coagulation factor concentrates may result in the development of inhibitory antibodies directed against factor VIII (FVIII). In this study, a previously unpublished ELISA test for FVIII inhibitor screening (Genetic Testing Institute [GTI] FVIII inhibitor, Brookfield, WI, USA) was evaluated in 131 blood samples (124 samples from patients with haemophilia A, and seven serial samples from one patient with an acquired FVIII inhibitor). Comparisons were made with the routine screening assay (based on recovery of FVIII) and confirmed where positive (< 90% recovery) with the New Oxford assay. The ELISA kit had a sensitivity of 97.7% and specificity of 78.4%. The high negative predictive value of this new test (98.6%) suggests it may be useful as a reliable, rapid (< 2 h) and flexible (microwell strip format) tool for inhibitor screening of samples from both patients with haemophilia A and those with suspected acquired FVIII inhibitors.     

ELISA system for detection of immune responses to FVIII: a study of 246 samples and correlation with the Bethesda assay

Inhibitors of FVIII are usually IgG polyclonal antibodies that develop as alloimmune responses in patients with congenital haemophilia A or as autoimmune responses resulting in acquired haemophilia. Their recognition can be difficult, especially when the titre is low. Furthermore, results from a Bethesda assay often require several days as samples are referred to a specialty laboratory. The aim of this study is to assess the utility of an ELISA system for detecting immune responses to FVIII. A total of 246 plasma samples submitted from 176 individuals with immune responses to FVIII, as verified with the Bethesda assay, and samples from 50 control subjects were tested for the presence of FVIII-specific IgG using an ELISA-based assay. Paired sera from 18 of the patients were also tested by the ELISA. Of the 246 samples that were positive for a FVIII inhibitor by the Bethesda assay, 235 (95.5%) were also positive by ELISA. The regression coefficient, using Log BU was r = 0.82. The correlation data were strengthened when 27 inhibitor samples were diluted further. There was a strong correlation between ELISA results for the 18-paired serum and plasma samples (r = 0.99). There is a strong correlation between the ELISA and Bethesda methods in detecting immune responses to FVIII. The ELISA provides rapid screening that could be available well in advance of confirmation by the Bethesda assay.     

Antibody formation and specificity in Bethesda‐negative brother pairs with haemophilia A

Antibodies directed towards non‐neutralizing epitopes on the factor VIII protein (FVIII) may be detected in patients with haemophilia A. We evaluated the prevalence of non‐neutralizing antibodies, in 201 inhibitor‐negative brother pairs with severe haemophilia A, enrolled in the Malmö International Brother Study and the Haemophilia Inhibitor Genetics Study. To evaluate binding specificity of the antibodies, ELISA plates were coated with two recombinant full‐length (FL) FVIII‐products and one recombinant B‐domain‐deleted (BDD) product. Seventy‐nine patients (39.3%) had a history of positive inhibitor titre measured by Bethesda assay, and FVIII antibodies were detected in 20 of them (25.3%). Additional 23 samples from subjects without a history of FVIII inhibitors were ELISA‐positive corresponding to a frequency of non‐neutralizing antibodies of 18.9%. The antibody response towards the different FVIII products was heterogenous, and was raised not only towards the non‐functional B‐domain but also towards both FL‐rFVIII and BDD‐rFVIII. In patients considered successfully treated with immune tolerance induction, 25.4% had remaining FVIII antibodies. The number of families with an antibody response in all siblings was increased when the total antibody response was taken into account, further supporting the concept of a genetic predisposition of the immune response. Further studies and careful monitoring over time are required to appreciate the immune response on the risk of inhibitor development or recurrence in the future.     

Induced antibodies to von Willebrand factor

Plasma from 15 patients with haemophilia A and 4 patients with von Willebrand's disease (VWD) has been investigated for the presence of antibodies to von Willebrand factor (VWF) using ELISA and immunoblotting systems. All plasma samples were also analyzed for anticoagulant activity against factor VIII coagulant activity (FVIII:C) and ristocetin co-factor activity of VWF (RCof). The patients were on regular prophylaxis or treated 'on demand' with different commercial FVIII-VWF complex concentrates. Neutralizing activity against FVIII:C was only found in haemophiliacs (in 3 out of 15), whereas anti-RC of was only found in VWD patients (in 2 out of 4). In ELISA, antibodies to VWF were detected in 3 of the VWD patients. However, using the immunoblotting system, antibodies to the multimeric structure of VWF were found not only in VWD patients (in 3 out of 4); remarkably 9 out of 15 haemophiliacs also reacted with VWF, including some that did not show FVIII:C inhibitors. The pattern of VWF multimers obtained with the antibodies showed differences among the patients. These findings are discussed together with the mechanisms by which such antibodies could have developed in haemophilia A patients who are not deficient in this particular protein (VWF).     

Low factor VIII recovery in haemophilia A patients without inhibitor titre is not due to the presence of anti-factor VIII antibodies undetectable by the Bethesda assay

Measurements of factor VIII (FVIII) recovery in previously untreated patients with haemophilia A were done as part of the clinical trial of safety and efficacy of the recombinant FVIII, Recombinate. In 22 of 72 assessable patients, positive inhibitor titres > or = 0.6 Bethesda units mL-1 were detected by the Bethesda assay in one or more plasma samples, and the remaining 50 patients were negative at all timepoints. Of the latter group, 16 individuals without inhibitors unexpectedly had both normal (111) and low (52) recoveries during the study. We investigated the possibility that other antibodies not detectable in the Bethesda assay were responsible for the low recovery, by using a highly sensitive immunopreciptation (IP) assay for detection of all antiFVIII antibodies. Eight of the 16 patients with low and normal recoveries did indeed have antibodies detected by the IP assay, and the remaining eight were negative. Four antibody-positive individuals had insignificantly low titres, and the other four had modest to high titres. In the latter group, antibodies were found with similar frequencies and titre in plasmas from patients with low or normal recovery. Low recovery in haemophilia A patients without inhibitor titres must therefore be attributed to factors other than antiFVIII.     

Simplified immunoradiometric assay for factor VIII coagulant antigen

A simplified, non-competitive, solid phase immunoradiometric assay has been developed for the quantitation of factor VIII coagulant antigen (VIII:CAg)--the antigenic counterpart of FVIII coagulant activity (VIII:C). Both homologous and heterologous antibodies to human factor VIII (FVIII) were used in this assay. Initially, FVIII in a test sample was attached to immobilized, human IgG obtained from a polytransfused haemophilia A patient with a high titre antibody to VIII:C. The bound FVIII was then detected using rabbit 125I-IgG specific for human FVIII. The concentration of VIII:CAg correlated well with VIII:C levels in the plasma from normal donors (r = 0.84, n - 15). Homozygote von Willebrand's disease patients had undetectable levels of VIII:CAg in their plasma. Patients with severe haemophilia A (VIII:C less than 0.01 u/ml) could be divided into groups on the basis of the VIII:CAg levels, i.e. those having undetectable VIII:CAg and other with measurable VIII:CAg. VIII:CAg detected in normal serum was less than 0.002 u/ml. In this assay the use of human antibody to FVIII is considerably decreased compared to other methods for VIII:CAg, and the time-consuming steps to immunopurify human anti-FVIII antibody are eliminated.     

von Willebrand factor in factor VIII concentrates protects against neutralization by factor VIII antibodies of haemophilia A patients

We investigated the neutralization activity of factor VIII (FVIII) antibodies of 12 haemophilia A patients, acquired during treatment with plasma-derived FVIII concentrates. All plasma samples, drawn in a clinically stable situation before any immunotolerance treatment, contained anti-A2 domain and anti-light-chain FVIII antibodies. In nine patients' plasmas, containing relatively high amounts of FVIII light-chain antibodies (53-96%), a higher neutralization activity was found against recombinant FVIII concentrate (Recombinate) than against plasma-derived von Willebrand factor (vWF)-containing concentrate (Haemoctin SDH). No difference in neutralization of the two concentrates was found in two patients' plasmas with almost equal content of FVIII light- and heavy-chain antibodies, or one plasma with predominantly heavy-chain antibodies. These results suggest that haemophilia A patients with relatively high amounts of FVIII light-chain antibodies in plasma might benefit by infusion of FVIII concentrates containing vWF because vWF appears to have some protective effect on FVIII. This hypothesis should be tested by a clinical study.     

Influence of factor VIII on overall coagulability and fibrinolytic potential of haemophilic plasma as measured by global assay: monitoring in haemophilia A

The objectives of the present study were to evaluate the analytical sensitivity of the recently developed Clot Formation and Lysis (CloFAL) global assay for factor VIII (FVIII) deficiency, both in vitro and ex vivo, to determine whether this global assay is influenced by FVIII inhibitors, and to investigate the coagulative response to FVIII replacement in haemophilia A patients using the CloFAL assay in comparison with FVIII activity. Among adults and children alike, the CloFAL assay coagulation index (CI) was significantly decreased in FVIII-deficient vs. healthy subjects (adults median CI: 2% vs. 94% respectively; children median CI: 3% vs. 63%; P < 0.001 for each), and correlated significantly with activated partial thromboplastin time-based FVIII activity across all individuals (r = 0.78; P < 0.001). The CloFAL assay was analytically sensitive to deficient FVIII activity and also influenced by the presence of von Willebrand factor. Severe haemophilia A patients without inhibitory antibodies to FVIII showed considerable heterogeneity in CloFAL assay waveforms, despite a uniformly diminished CI of 0-1%. During FVIII infusion half-life studies in patients with severe haemophilia A, the CloFAL assay demonstrated a marked rise in coagulability 30 min following infusion, with progressive decrease in coagulability towards baseline over the ensuing 48-h period. In each case, the profile of coagulative response to FVIII infusion as determined by CloFAL assay CI differed qualitatively from that measured by FVIII activity. These findings indicate that the CloFAL assay may be useful as an adjunctive test to FVIII activity measurements in the therapeutic monitoring of haemophilia A.     

Risk of inhibitor development in mild haemophilia A increases with age

Summary. Mild haemophilia A is a rare disease with a relatively mild phenotype. Treatment with factor VIII (FVIII) is indicated after trauma or for surgery only. FVIII infusion may result in the development of inhibiting antibodies against FVIII. This study describes the relation between age and other risk factors for inhibitor development in mild haemophilia. A retrospective cohort study was conducted among all patients with mild haemophilia (FVIII 0.05–0.40 IU mL^?1) registered at the van Creveldkliniek, University Medical Centre Utrecht, The Netherlands. Data on peak treatment with FVIII, gene mutation and history of inhibitor development were obtained from patient files from the period between 1st January 1970 and 31st December 2009. A total of 231 out of 297 (78%) patients had at least one exposure to FVIII, of whom 14 (6.1%) developed an inhibitor to FVIII at a median age of 66 years after a median of 50 exposure days (ED). Age at first exposure, age at peak treatment, number of peak treatments and Arg593Cys mutation were significantly associated with the development of an inhibitor, while continuous infusion with FVIII was not. Although the incidence of inhibitors in mild haemophilia is low, it increases with age and peak treatments. With increasing age patients with mild haemophilia will suffer from co‐morbidity more frequently, requiring surgical interventions and exposing them to an increased risk of inhibitor development. Especially patients with a change of arginine in cysteine at 593 are at risk for inhibitor development.     

Assay discrepancy in mild haemophilia A: entire population study in a National Haemophilia Centre

Summary.  Assay discrepancy in mild haemophilia, here defined by a significantly higher factor VIII (FVIII):C response by the one-stage procoagulant assay as compared with a two-stage enzymatic method, has repeatedly been reported in literature. The purpose of this study was to determine the overall prevalence of this phenomenon amongst mild haemophilia families from a population of 2.95 million inhabitants in the Western Danish region. Information was collected retrospectively through a thorough search of archives of the National Haemophilia Centre in Aarhus. We identified 109 patients with mild haemophilia A amongst whom 92 were eligible to enter the study. These represent a total of 53 unrelated families. Our data illustrate that this assay discrepancy pattern is found quite frequently amongst our mild haemophilia A families. While the ratio of FVIII:C chromogenic/FVIII:C clot values was quite consistent amongst patients belonging to same family pattern, ratios in the entire cohort of families ranged from 0.18 to 1.00. Selecting a cut-off level for the FVIII:C chromogenic/FVIII:C clot ratios at 0.7, 0.6 and 0.5, respectively, we found that 38 (72%), 27 (51%) and 19 (36%) of families, respectively, displayed this assay discrepancy. In 10 patients, the FVIII:C chromogenic level was inside the category of moderate haemophilia at >0.01–<0.05 IU mL⁻¹, pointing to a class-shift in the biochemical phenotype. In conclusion, our data illustrate a substantial prevalence of the assay discrepancy phenomenon amongst mild haemophilia A patients in our geographical area.     

Hydrolysis of factor VIII mediated by catalytic antibodies occurs in haemophilia A patients with or without factor VIII inhibitors

The major complication of the substitutive treatment of haemophilia A (HA) is the development of antifactor VIII (FVIII) antibodies. Most of these antibodies neutralize FVIII procoagulant activity, and are identified as FVIII inhibitor. A subgroup of these antibodies, ‘catalytic antibodies’, catalyses the FVIII hydrolysis. We investigated the frequency and the activity of catalytic antibodies, according to the phenotype of HA and the presence or absence of FVIII inhibitor. IgG from 16 patients with inhibitor and 17 patients without inhibitor were purified. Rates of FVIII hydrolysis and inhibitor titres were evaluated. Anti‐FVIII catalytic antibodies were detected in 63.6% of patients with HA, irrespective of the HA phenotype and the presence of FVIII inhibitor. The frequency was significantly higher for severe HA patients (73.3%) and patients with inhibitor (87.5%), but their FVIII‐proteolytic activity was not significantly different from patients with mild or moderate HA and patients without inhibitor. The evolution of both catalytic and inhibitory activities was studied for 11 patients with FVIII inhibitor. We observed two profiles. In the profile 1, 18.2% of patients, the catalytic activity and the inhibitor titre coevolved. In contrast, a dissociated evolution of these two parameters was observed in 72.8% patients in profile 2. These data confirm the importance of anti‐FVIII catalytic activity in patients with severe, moderate and mild HA. Interestingly, most of the patients presented a dissociated profile, suggesting that anti‐FVIII antibodies might not systematically act as FVIII inhibitors.     

Laboratory testing for factor VIII and IX inhibitors in haemophilia: A review

Inhibitors are antibodies directed against haemophilia treatment products which interfere with their function. Factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors in haemophilia A and factor IX (FIX) inhibitors in haemophilia B are significant clinically when they require a change in a patient's treatment regimen. Their persistence may increase morbidity and mortality. Multiple laboratory tests are now available for detecting and understanding inhibitors in haemophilia. Inhibitors are traditionally measured by their interference in clotting or chromogenic factor assays. They may also be detected using immunologic assays, such as enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay or fluorescence immunoassay. Anti‐FVIII or anti‐FIX antibodies of IgG₄ subclass best correlate with the presence of functional inhibitors. Improvements in inhibitor measurement have been recently introduced. Preanalytical heat treatment of patient specimens allows testing of patients without delaying treatment. Use of chromogenic and immunologic assays may aid in identification of false‐positive results, which are frequent among low‐titre inhibitors. Validated reagent substitutions can be used to reduce assay cost. New methods for defining assay positivity and reporting low‐titre inhibitors have been suggested. Challenges remain in the areas of quality control, assay standardization, monitoring of patients undergoing immune tolerance induction therapy and testing in the presence of modified and novel treatment products.     

Variation in inhibitor reactivity in acquired haemophilia A with different concentrates

Acquired haemophilia A due to the development of auto-antibodies directed against factor VIII (FVIII) is a rare disorder that may result in serious haemorrhagic episodes. Although in many cases no associated underlying disorders are apparent, the condition has been reported in association with autoimmune disorders, haematological malignancies, treatment with certain drugs and pregnancy. The reaction kinetics of auto-antibodies to FVIII differ from those observed with allo-antibodies in congenital haemophilia. Previous studies in congenital haemophilia have raised the possibility that inhibitory antibodies vary in their reactivity with the factor VIII molecules in different concentrates used for treatment. However, the interaction of FVIII in concentrates and inhibitors in acquired haemophilia has never been previously studied. In this study, the effect of different FVIII concentrates was studied on neutralization in vitro by performing inhibitor titres using the New Oxford inhibitor assay method. The inhibitor titre in eight patients with acquired haemophilia A was assayed against five commercially available FVIII concentrates of varying purity. The intermediate purity concentrate 8Y and the high purity concentrate that contains normal amounts of von Willebrand's Factor (vWF) (Alphanate) gave lower titres than the high purity concentrates with low (Monoclate-P) or no (Kogenate) von Willebrand content. All but one antibody had very low reactivity with porcine FVIII. Further work will be required to establish whether concentrates manifesting a low level of in vitro reactivity with the inhibitor have a better haemostatic effect in vivo.     

Characterization of inhibitors to FVIII with an ELISA in congenital and acquired haemophilia A

Different methods can be used for the detection and quantification of inhibitors or antibodies to coagulation factor VIII (FVIII). Traditionally, clotting assays have been used, in particular the Bethesda assay. These assays have, however, several shortcomings, due to the complex reaction kinetics of some inhibitors and a low sensitivity to low-titre antibodies. In addition, a universal FVIII inhibitor standard is lacking. Furthermore, clotting assays do not detect noninhibitory antibodies. Use of ELISAs has been described and FVIII from various commercially available FVIII concentrates has been used as target antigen in the assays. In the present study, we systematically explored the influence of different FVIII concentrates on the performance of an ELISA for detection of FVIII antibodies. The described ELISA was also used for further characterization of FVIII inhibitors in patients with acquired and congenital haemophilia A. We found that the source of FVIII had a substantial impact on the frequency of antibody detection. Albumin-free recombinant FVIII as target antigen gave the highest sensitivity for the assay, whereas plasma-derived concentrates containing a high level of von Willebrand factor (vWF) gave the lowest sensitivity. Presumably vWF interferes with the binding of antibodies to FVIII. We suggest that albumin-free recombinant FVIII should be used as target antigen when ELISAs are used for detection of FVIII antibodies.     

Thrombin generation as objective parameter of treatment response in patients with severe haemophilia A and high‐titre inhibitors

In Mexico, 15% of haemophilia A (HA) patients develop inhibitory alloantibodies in response to replacement therapy with factor VIII (FVIII), requiring bypass therapy such as activated prothrombin complex concentrate (APCC). Because bypass therapy has not been broadly available in Mexico even in recent years, this study aimed to evaluate the thrombin generation assay (TGA) in assessing the response to FVIII or APCC treatment in patients with severe HA positive to inhibitors. We studied 189 patients with severe HA. Clinical severity was verified by one‐stage APTT‐based clotting assay. Inhibitors to FVIII were investigated by the Nijmegen–Bethesda (N–B) method, and type of inhibition was assessed through serial plasma dilutions. Thrombin generation was measured with the calibrated automated thrombogram in inhibitor‐positive plasmas previously spiked and incubated with FVIII or APCC. Data were analysed using anova , Student or Fisher's exact tests. We detected 47 (24.9%) subjects with high‐titre (5–1700 N–B U mL^?1) and 25 (13.2%) subjects with low‐titre inhibitor antibodies (0.6–4.7 N–B U mL^?1). We found an association between kinetic behaviour and clinical response to FVIII (P = 0.0049) or vs. FVIII response evaluated with TGA (P = 0.0007). Global concordance between clinical and in vitro response was 70%. By evaluating the capacity of thrombin formation in a plasma sample, TGA predicts the response to FVIII or APCC therapy and allows individual optimization of resources in patients with severe HA and high‐titre inhibitors. The inhibition pattern of the antibodies to FVIII:C correlated with the TGA parameters and showed an association with the clinical response to FVIII.     

Effects of factor VIII inhibitor bypassing activity (FEIBA), recombinant factor VIIa or both on thrombin generation in normal and haemophilia A plasma

Summary.  Factor VIII inhibitor bypass activity (FEIBA) and recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) are the common bypassing agents for treating haemophilia A or haemophilia B patients who developed an inhibitor to factor VIII or IX, respectively. As these preparations differ in their composition and mode of action, combined therapy, either sequential or simultaneous has recently been used for achieving haemostasis during bleeding episodes in patients who became refractory to FEIBA or rFVIIa when each was given alone. In this in vitro study, we show by a sensitive assay of thrombin generation that phospholipids present in FEIBA and other procoagulants contribute to FEIBA's activity and that exogenous phospholipids are essential for the activity of rFVIIa. We also demonstrate that the combination of FEIBA and rFVIIa has a marked synergistic effect on thrombin generation in plasma of a haemophilia A patient with a high titre of an inhibitor. It is conceivable that simultaneous administration of small doses of FEIBA and rFVIIa may be beneficial in treating haemophilia A patients, with an inhibitor to FVIII, who are resistant to conventional therapy.     

Late immune tolerance induction in haemophilia A patients

The incidence of inhibitor development in patients with severe haemophilia A is approximately 30%. Immune tolerance induction (ITI) is commonly utilized to eradicate these antibodies and is successful in 63–100% of cases. Potential predictors of a poor outcome in ITI include a high preinduction titre, high historical peak titre, older age at start of ITI and prolonged interval from diagnosis to start of ITI. The goal of this study was to characterize the outcomes of patients from our centre who have undergone late ITI, many of whom had poor prognostic features. Medical records of patients in our centre with severe/moderately severe haemophilia A (< 2% FVIII activity) and history of inhibitor were reviewed. Data were abstracted from all patients who attempted late ITI. Nine patients underwent late ITI between January 1999 and December 2011. Within this cohort, 7 (78%) patients were black, 6 (67%) were <21 years old and 4 (44%) had a family history of inhibitor. Three patients had previously received ITI unsuccessfully. To date, 4 (44%) patients are tolerized (persistently negative inhibitor titre, FVIII recovery >66% and successfully treated with FVIII products ±FVIII t^½ of > 6 h). Three patients are partially tolerized (have low responding inhibitor, variable FVIII recovery and successfully treated with FVIII products). Two patients are not tolerized. Some patients with haemophilia A and long‐standing inhibitors may benefit from ITI.     

Thrombin generation in haemophilia A patients with mutations causing factor VIII assay discrepancy

Summary. Up to 40% of patients with mild haemophilia A have a discrepancy whereby factor VIII (FVIII) measurements by a two‐stage chromogenic assay (FVIII:C_CH) are disproportionately reduced compared with the FVIII one‐stage clotting value (FVIII:C). Which assay best reflects the coagulation potential and clinical phenotype in this patient group is of clinical significance, yet remains unclear. We have assessed the global coagulant ability of haemophilia patients with FVIII assay discrepancy using calibrated automated thrombography (CAT). A total of 18 patients with mutations Arg531His/Cys or Arg698Trp causing FVIII discrepancy were investigated, together with 12 haemophilia patients with concordant FVIII values and 15 normal controls. Factor VIII levels in all patients and controls were measured using both one‐stage clotting assay and two‐stage chromogenic assay. Thrombin generation was assessed in platelet‐poor plasma by CAT using a low tissue factor concentration (1 pm ). FVIII:C_CH values were below normal in all patients, and in the discrepant group were between 1.5‐ and 8‐fold lower than FVIII:C values. CAT parameters were affected in all haemophilia patients. The endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) was reduced to 58–67% of the mean normal value (1301 nm min^?1), whereas peak thrombin was further reduced to 27–30% of the mean normal value (178 nm ) in both discrepant and concordant patient groups. Analysis of the discrepant patient group showed the most significant correlation between the one‐stage FVIII:C assay and ETP (r² = 0.44) and peak thrombin parameters (r² = 0.27).