Phase II study of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with irinotecan plus S-1 in locally advanced rectal cancer

Background and purpose

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of preoperative radiation therapy combined with S-1 and irinotecan (SI) in LARC.

Materials and methods

Patients were considered LARC if they had a T3/T4 lesion or node positive. Weekly doses of 40 mg/m² irinotecan were intravenously administered once per week during weeks 1-5 of radiotherapy. S-1 (70 mg/m²) was given from Monday to Friday in all weeks of radiotherapy. 3-D conformal radiotherapy was given at daily fractions of 1.8 Gy for 5 days for a total dose of 50.4 (45 + 5.4) Gy. Surgery was performed 4-6 weeks following the completion of chemoradiation.

Results

Between June 2006 and November 2007, 43 pts were enrolled. The stage was: cT3 24 patients, cT4 6 patients; 28 patients were cN+. Forty-one patients completed the chemoradiation and 42 patients underwent operation: a low anterior resection was performed in 36 patients, a total colectomy in 1 patient, and an abdominal perineal resection in 5 patients. T downstaging was observed in 50%; 23 N+ patients became N− (55%). The complete pathological response was observed in 9 patients (21%). The 3-year locoregional failure rate, distant failure rate, disease-free survival, and overall survival were 9.5%, 18.6%, 72.1%, and 94.3%, respectively. Only three patients experienced G3 diarrhea; one had G3 sepsis and two had septic shock. Hematological toxicity (G3-G4) was observed in five patients.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated the efficacy of preoperative CRT with S-1 and irinotecan with 21% of complete response. However, prompt recognition and management of infection is needed to use it in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.     

Phase II study of capecitabine and oxaliplatin given prior to and concurrently with preoperative pelvic radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

This multicentre phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of preoperative capecitabine plus oxaliplatin and radiotherapy (RT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (T3/T4 rectal adenocarcinoma with or without nodal involvement). Treatment consisted of one cycle of XELOX (capecitabine 1000 mg m(-2) bid on days 1-14 and oxaliplatin 130 mg m(-2) on day 1), followed by RT (1.8 Gy fractions 5 days per week for 5 weeks) plus CAPOX (capecitabine 825 mg m(-2) bid on days 22-35 and 43-56, and oxaliplatin 50 mg m(-2) on days 22, 29, 43 and 50). Surgery was recommended 5 weeks after completion of chemoradiotherapy. The primary end point was pathological complete tumour response (pCR). Sixty patients were enrolled. In the intent-to-treat population, the pCR rate was 23% (95% CI: 13-36%). 58 patients underwent surgery; R0 resection was achieved in 57 (98%) patients, including all 5 patients with T4 tumours. Sphincter preservation was achieved in 49 (84%) patients. Tumour and/or nodal downstaging was observed in 39 (65%) patients. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were diarrhoea (20%) and lymphocytopaenia (43%). Preoperative capecitabine, oxaliplatin and RT achieved encouraging rates of pCR, R0 resection, sphincter preservation and tumour downstaging in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.     

Phase I-II trial of concurrent capecitabine and oxaliplatin with preoperative intensity-modulated radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

PURPOSE: To identify the maximal tolerated dose level of preoperative intensity-modulated radiotherapy combined with capecitabine and oxaliplatin and to evaluate the efficacy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with rectal T3-T4 and/or N0-N+ rectal cancer received capecitabine 825 mg/m(2) twice daily Monday through Friday and oxaliplatin 60 mg/m(2) intravenously on Days 1, 8, and 15, concurrently with intensity-modulated radiotherapy. The radiation dose was increased in 5.0-Gy steps in cohorts of 3 patients starting from 37.5 Gy in 15 fractions (dose level [DL] 1). DL2 and DL3 were designed to reach 42.5 Gy in 17 fractions and 47.5 Gy in 19 fractions, respectively. RESULTS: No dose-limiting toxicity was observed at DL1 or DL2. Of the 3 patients treated at DL3, 1 presented with Grade 3 diarrhea, which was considered a dose-limiting toxicity, and 3 additional patients were added. Of the 6 patients treated at DL3, no new dose-limiting toxicities were observed, and DL3 was identified as the recommended dose in this study. Eight additional patients were treated at 47.5 Gy. Grade 2 proctitis was the most frequent adverse event (40%); Grade 3 diarrhea occurred in 2 patients (10%). All patients underwent surgery, and 17 patients (85%) underwent R0 resection. Four patients (20%) presented with a histologic response of Grade 4, 11 (55%) with Grade 3+, 2 (15%) with Grade 3, and 2 patients (10%) with Grade 2. CONCLUSION: The maximal tolerated dose in this study was 47.5 Gy. The high rates of pathologic response of Grade 3+ and 4 must be confirmed through the accrual of new patients in the Phase II study.     

Phase II study of preoperative radiation plus concurrent daily tegafur-uracil (UFT) with leucovorin for locally advanced rectal cancer

Background

The human apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1/Redox effector factor-1 (APE1/Ref-1) is implicated in tumor development and progression. Recently, the APE1/Ref-1 promoter -141T/G variant (rs1760944) has been reported to be associated with lung cancer risk. Given the importance of APE1/Ref-1 in both DNA repair and redox activity, we speculate that the -141T/G polymorphism may confer individual susceptibility to gliomas or its subtypes.

Methods

The APE1/Ref-1 -141T/G polymorphism was analyzed in a case-control study including 766 glioma patients (among them 241 glioblastoma, 284 astrocytomas except for glioblastoma and 241 other gliomas) and 824 cancer-free controls from eastern China. Genotyping was performed with Sequenom MassARRAY iPLEX platform by use of allele-specific MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry assay. We estimated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) using unconditional logistic regression. A test of trend was calculated using the genotype as an ordinal variable in the regression model. For each statistically significant association identified, we estimated the false positive reporting probability (FPRP). FPRP values less than 0.2 were consider to indicate robust associations.

Results

The significant association between the APE1/Ref-1 promoter -141T/G polymorphism and glioma risk was not observed. However, the stratified analysis by histology revealed the variant allele G significantly decreased glioblastoma risk (OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.65-0.98, P = 0.032). Individuals with the homozygous -141GG genotype exhibited 46% reduced risk of glioblastoma (adjusted OR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.34-0.87, P = 0.012), compared with the TT homozygote. This result remained robust given the prior probabilities of 25% (FPRP = 0.052) and 10% (FPRP = 0.140), but not with a prior probability of 1% (FPRP = 0.643). The P-associated with the trend test was 0.014.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that a specific genetic variant located in the APE1/Ref-1 promoter may modulate risk of glioblastoma, but not for other histological gliomas. Larger studies with more APE1 polymorphisms are required to validate these preliminary findings.     

Phase I trial of neoadjuvant preoperative chemotherapy with S-1 and irinotecan plus radiation in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD) of irinotecan combined with preoperative chemoradiotherapy with S-1 in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We gave preoperative radiotherapy (total dose, 45 Gy) to 23 patients with locally advanced (T3/T4) rectal cancer. Concurrently, S-1 was given orally at a fixed dose of 80 mg/m2/day on Days 1-5, 8-12, 22-26, and 29-33, and irinotecan was given as a 90-min continuous i.v. infusion on Days 1, 8, 22, and 29. The dose of irinotecan was initially 40 mg/m2/day and gradually increased to determine the MTD and RD of this regimen. RESULTS: Among the 4 patients who received 90 mg/m2 irinotecan, 2 had Grade 4 neutropenia and 1 had Grade 3 diarrhea. Because dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) occurred in 3 of the 4 patients, 90 mg/m2 irinotecan was designated as the MTD. Consequently, 80 mg/m2 irinotecan was given to 7 additional patients, with no DLT, and this was considered the RD. Of the patients who received irinotecan at the RD or lower doses, 6 (31.6%) had a complete pathologic response (Grade 3) and 9 (47.4%) underwent sphincter-preserving surgery. CONCLUSIONS: With our new regimen, the MTD of irinotecan was 90 mg/m2, and the RD of irinotecan for Phase II studies was 80 mg/m2. Although our results are preliminary, this new neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was considered safe and active, meriting further investigation in Phase II studies.     

Phase II study of preoperative irradiation and chemotherapy with capecitabine in patients with locally advanced rectal carcinoma

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy has demonstrated to improve resectability and local control in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). 5-fluorouracil (5FU) has traditionally been the drug of choice in combination with radiation therapy. Early studies of capecitabine (CAP) have shown its potential to replace 5FU. Between March 2002 and April 2005, 31 patients with newly diagnosed LARC (T2 N+ 2 cases, T3 N0-N+ 25 cases, T4 N0-N+ 4 cases) received the combined treatment. Surgery was planned 6-8 weeks after chemoradiation. Adjuvant chemotherapy with 5FU plus leucovorin for 6 courses was given in pN+ patients. All patients completed the planned treatment. Grade 3 acute toxicity was observed in 5 patients (16%). Nineteen patients (61%) had a downstaging. A complete pathological remission was observed in 3 cases (10%). Median follow-up is of 23 months (range; 6-36 months). The results of this experience confirm the data of the literature about the feasibility and efficacy of a neoadjuvant treatment with radiation and CAP in LARC.     

Sex differences in the safety of S‐1 plus oxaliplatin and S‐1 plus cisplatin for patients with metastatic gastric cancer

Previous studies have shown sex‐related differences in the incidence of adverse events following treatment with fluoropyrimidines, however the mechanism of this difference is unknown. We examined sex‐related differences in the safety of S‐1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) and S‐1 plus cisplatin (CS) in 663 metastatic gastric cancer patients taking part in a phase III study. The incidences of leukopenia (odds ratio [OR] 1.9; P = .015), neutropenia (OR 2.2; P = .002), nausea (OR 2.0; P = .009), and vomiting (OR 2.8; P < .001) were increased in women versus men treated with SOX, while vomiting (OR 2.9; P < .001) and stomatitis (OR 1.8; P = .043) were increased in women versus men treated with CS. In contrast, male patients treated with CS experienced thrombocytopenia more often (OR 0.51; P = .009). The mean relative dose intensity of S‐1 in SOX was 75.4% in women and 81.4% in men (P = .032). No difference in efficacy was observed between women and men undergoing either regimen. Sex‐related differences in adverse reactions during SOX and CS treatment were confirmed in this phase III study. Further translational research studies are warranted to pursue the cause of this difference.     

Implications for selecting local excision in locally advanced rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiation

Local excision may offer the possibility of organ preservation for the management of locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT). However, the oncological outcomes of this strategy have been largely associated with the risk of nodal metastases. In this study, Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER)-registered rectal cancer patients, and patients from Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (FUSCC) after preoperative chemoradiation were combined to analyze the incidence of lymph node metastasis. The results showed that there was a high risk for residual lymph node metastasis among patients even with complete pathologic response of primary tumor after preoperative CRT (12.6–13.2%). However, in the selected group of patients with pre-CRT MRI staging cN0 rectal cancer, there was only one ypN+ case (3.3%) in ypT0–1 group. These results suggest that pre-CRT MRI staging cN0 patients achieved ypT0–1 of bowel wall tumor may be suitable for local resection.     

Early clinical results from chemoradiation with 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin for locally advanced rectal cancer

Purpose: Preoperative chemoradiation with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has improved local control and resectability in patients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma. The possible benefit of adding oxaliplatin is being investigated. We present background on the use of oxaliplatin as well as institutional experience assessing treatment tolerability and early outcome data. Patients and Methods: From August 2001 to August 2006, 15 patients were treated with concurrent 5-FU, oxaliplatin, and radiation. Each had locally advanced rectal carcinoma with staging as follows: T3 (10 patients), T4 (5 patients), N1 (3 patients), and M1 (1 patient). Three patients were treated for local recurrence; 2 had received previous radiation therapy. All patients received continuous-infusion 5-FU at 225 mg/m2 per day. The oxaliplatin dose was 70 mg/m2 in 1 patient and 85 mg/m2 in the others, administered every other week x 3 weeks starting on day 1 of radiation. Resection followed completion of radiation by 6 weeks. Results: The treatment was tolerable, with the most frequent hematologic toxicity being grade 1/2 anemia. Twelve patients were evaluable, with 11 treated preoperatively. All were able to undergo resection with negative margins, with T stage at resection as follows: T4 (2 patients, 1 with 5% viable tumor), T3 (4 patients), T2 (1 patient), T1 (2 patients); there were pathologic complete responses in 4 patients. At resection, 2 patients had N2 disease; 1 of these was also found to have a peritoneal metastasis. Two patients with clinical N1 disease initially were N0 at resection. With median follow-up of 13 months (range, 4-36 months), 9 patients have clinically no evidence of disease. There have been no local recurrences and 1 death from disease. Conclusion: We present tolerability and early clinical efficacy data for patients treated with concurrent 5-FU and oxaliplatin chemoradiation. The oxaliplatin-based regimen was tolerable. All patients were able to undergo resection with negative margins, with encouraging downstaging, local control, and survival.     

Phase II trial of chemoradiotherapy with S‐1 plus cisplatin for unresectable locally advanced head and neck cancer (JCOG0706)

We conducted a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of chemoradiotherapy concurrent with S‐1 plus cisplatin in patients with unresectable locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Chemotherapy consisted of S‐1 twice daily on days 1–14 at 60 mg/m²/day and cisplatin at 20 mg/m²/day on days 8–11, repeated twice at a 5‐week interval. Single daily radiation of 70 Gy in 35 fractions was given concurrently starting on day 1. For patients achieving an objective response after chemoradiotherapy, two additional cycles of chemotherapy were administered. Of the 45 enrolled patients, the percentage of clinical complete remission, the primary endpoint, was 64.4% (8 complete response, 21 good partial response) on central review. After a median follow‐up of 3.52 years, 3‐year local progression‐free survival was 62.2%, with 3‐year progression‐free survival of 60.0%, 3‐year overall survival of 64.4%, and 3‐year time to treatment failure of 48.9%. Grade 3 or 4 toxicity included pharyngeal mucositis (46.7%), oral mucositis (44.4%), dysphagia (46.7%), anorexia (42.2%), radiation dermatitis (26.7%), neutropenia (26.7%), and febrile neutropenia (4.4%). No treatment‐related deaths were observed. This combination showed promising efficacy with acceptable toxicities.     

Phase II trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with XELOX plus bevacizumab for locally advanced rectal cancer

In Western countries, the standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer is preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by total mesorectal excision. On the other hand, in Japan, treatment results without radiotherapy are by no means inferior; therefore, extrapolation of results of preoperative treatment in Western countries to Japan is controversial. We consider that survival may be improved by preoperative treatment with new anticancer agents as they are expected not only to decrease the local recurrence rate but also to prevent distant metastases. We are conducting a multicentre Phase II study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy using XELOX plus bevacizumab without radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. The primary endpoint of the study is treatment compliance. Secondary endpoints are overall survival, disease-free survival, local recurrence-free survival, objective response rate, R0 resection rate and adverse events. Thirty patients are required for this study.     

Improved incidence of pT0 downstaged surgical specimens in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) treated with induction oxaliplatin plus 5-fluorouracil and preoperative chemoradiation.

PURPOSE: To compare efficacy in terms of pathologic response in LARC patients treated with preoperative chemoradiation, with or without a short-intense course of induction oxaliplatin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 05/98 to 10/02, 114 patients were treated with preoperative chemoradiation (4500-5040 cGy + oral Tegafur 1200 mg/day) for cT(3)-(4)N(+/x)M(0) rectal cancer. Starting 05/01, 52 consecutive patients additionally received induction FOLFOX-4, oxaliplatin (85 mg/m(2) iv d1), 5-FU (400 mg/m(2) iv bolus d1) and 600 mg/m(2) iv continuous infusion in 22 h with leucovorin (200 mg iv) d1 and d2, every 15 days (2 cycles), followed by the previously described Tegafur chemoradiation regime. Surgery was performed in 5-6 weeks. Pathological assessment investigated post-treatment T and N status in the rectal wall and peri-rectal tissues. RESULTS: Patients, tumor and treatment characteristics were comparable between groups. Incidence of pT(0) specimens was significantly increased by induction FOLFOX-4 (P = 0.006). Total T and N downstaging were 58% versus 75% and 42% versus 40%, respectively (P = ns). T downstaging of > or =2 categories was significantly superior in FOLFOX-4 group (P = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: Short-intense induction FOLFOX-4 significantly improves pathologic complete response in LARC patients treated with tegafur-sensitized preoperative chemoradiation. The 44% rate of pT(0)-(1) specimens observed in the oxaliplatin group should impulse innovative surgical approaches to promote ano-rectal sphincter conserving protocols.     

Prognostic implications of response to preoperative infusional chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of response to preoperative infusional chemoradiation on outcome parameters among patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy, 45 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks with continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil (300 mg/m2 per day), was given to 117 patients. As determined by pretreatment endorectal ultrasound (EUS), 96% of cases were Stage T3, and 51% had EUS evidence of perirectal adenopathy. Surgery was performed approximately 6 weeks after chemoradiation therapy. Postoperatively adjuvant systemic therapy, consisting of 400-425 mg/m2 of 5-fluorouracil plus 20 mg/m2 leucovorin for 5 days, was administered every 28 days for six cycles. Outcome parameters of local control (LC), freedom from distant metastases (DMC), disease-free survival (DFS) and cancer specific survival (CSS) were evaluated relative to primary tumor characteristics. RESULTS: The final post-treatment pathological tumor stages were complete response in 27%, Tis-2 N0 in 26%, T2 N1 in 5%, T3 N0 in 21%, T3 N1 in 15%, T4 N0 in 5% and T4 N1 in 1%. Down-staging occurred in 61% of cases. The pretreatment primary tumor size only influenced rates of local control (P < 0.03) and had no other influence on outcome parameters. Pretreatment evidence of perirectal lymph node involvement had no impact on outcome parameters. Pathologic evidence of nodal involvement did affect DMC (P < 0.002) and DFS (P < 0.003). Pathologic evidence of response did influence freedom from the development of distant metastases (P < 0.004). On pairwise analysis this relationship held only when responders were compared to non-responders. No difference was observed based on the level of downstaging at the primary tumor. Correspondingly, DFS was improved when non-responders were compared to downstaged patients (P < 0.01). Response to preoperative chemoradiation failed to affect rates of LC or CSS. For the group as a whole, adjuvant chemotherapy improved only CSS (P < 0.03). Adjuvant chemotherapy was given to 74 patients, 36 of whom had responded to preoperative chemoradiation. Improvements were only seen in DFS (P < 0.03) when down-staged patients were compared to the non-responders who received adjuvant chemotherapy. In addition, the DFS rates were lower in the non-responder group who received adjuvant chemotherapy even when they were compared to down-staged patients who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy (P < 0.04). CONCLUSION: Consistent with other reports, disease free survival and subsequent development of distant metastases is reduced in the more than 60% of patients who respond to preoperative infusional chemoradiation. Evidence of response appears more significant than the degree of response. At present, no impact is seen on cancer specific survival rates. Consideration should be given for strategies that base selection of subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy on response to preoperative chemoradiation.     

Improved overall survival among responders to preoperative chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer

The aim of this study was to determine if the response to preoperative radiation and chemotherapy with continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) was predictive for survival among patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Preoperative chemoradiation (CTX/XRT) that delivered 45 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks with continuous infusion 5-FU (300 mg/m2/day) was given to 117 patients. The pretreatment stage distribution, as determined by endorectal ultrasound (u), included uT2N0 in 2%, uT3N0 in 47%, uT3N1 in 49%, and uT4N0 in 2% of cases; endorectal ultrasound was not performed in 13% of cases (15 patients). Approximately 6 weeks after completion of CTX/XRT, surgery was performed. Adjuvant chemotherapy, consisting of 400 to 425 mg/m2 of 5-FU plus 20 mg/m2 leucovorin for 5 days, was administered every 28 days for 4 to 6 cycles after surgical resection. Among the 74 patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy, the preoperative stage of disease was 31 with T3N0 and 43 T3N1. Median follow-up was 46 months (range 2 to 89 months). The pathologic tumor stages were Tis-2N0 in 26%, T2N1 in 5%, T3N0 in 21%, T3N1 in 15%, T4N0 in 5%, and T4N1 in 1%; a complete response (CR) to preoperative CTX/XRT was pathologically confirmed in 32 (27%) of patients. Tumor down-staging occurred in 72 (62%) cases. A sphincter-saving procedure (SP) was possible in 59% of patients. The median DFS and overall survival rates for responders were 46 months and 47 months, respectively; for non-responders these outcome measures were 38 months and 41 months, respectively. Log-rank analysis showed that the distant metastatic-free survival rates improved with any response to CTX/XRT (p < 0.00001), CR to CTX/XRT (p < 0.009) and SP (p < 0.012). Likewise, these parameters also significantly influenced DFS rates (CTX/XRT p < 0.00001; CR p < 0.006; and SP p < 0.008). Control of pelvic disease was influenced by clinical size (p < 0.002) and SP (p < 0.016) on univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis only clinical size (p < 0.002) continued to be a significant factor for local control. Factors on multivariate analysis that resulted in significant improvements in cancer-specific survival included any response to preoperative CTX/XRT (p < 0.017) and administration of adjuvant chemotherapy (p < 0.034). Any response to preoperative CTX/XRT improved distant metastatic-free and disease-free survival rates. Multivariate analysis confirmed that a response to preoperative CTX/XRT predicted for improvements in overall survival among patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Patients who fail to respond to preoperative 5-FU based chemotherapy given concomitantly with radiation have higher rates of distant metastases with adjuvant 5-FU therapy.     

Improved survival with adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer patients treated with preoperative chemoradiation regardless of pathologic response

ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to examine the effect of postoperative chemotherapy on survival in patients with stage II or III rectal adenocarcinoma who undergo neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) and surgical resection.MethodsA retrospective review of the National Cancer Database (NCDB) from 2006 to 2013 was performed. Cases were analyzed based on pathologic complete response (pCR) status and use of adjuvant therapy. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival probabilities.Results23,045 cases were identified, of which 5832 (25.31%) achieved pCR. In the pCR group, 1513 (25.9%) received adjuvant chemotherapy, and in the non-pCR group, 5966 (34.7%) received adjuvant therapy. In the pCR group, five-year survival probability was 87% (95% CI 84%–89%) with adjuvant therapy and 81% (95% CI 79%–82%) without adjuvant therapy. In the non-pCR group, five-year survival probability was 78% (95% CI 76%–79%) with adjuvant therapy and 70% (95% CI 69%–71%) without adjuvant therapy. In the non-pCR and node-negative subgroup (ypN-), five-year survival probability was 86% (95% CI 84%–88%) with adjuvant therapy and 76% (95% CI 74%–77%) without adjuvant therapy. In the non-pCR and node-positive subgroup (ypN+), five-year survival probability was 67% (95% CI 65%–70%) with adjuvant therapy and 60% (95% CI 58%–63%) without adjuvant therapy.ConclusionsAdjuvant chemotherapy in stage II or III rectal adenocarcinoma is associated with increased five-year survival probability regardless of pCR status. We observed similar survival outcomes among non-pCR ypN- treated with adjuvant chemotherapy compared with patients achieving pCR treated with adjuvant chemotherapy.