Synthesis and characterization of amphiphilic graft copolymer poly(ethylene oxide)-graft-poly(methyl acrylate)

A novel well-defined amphiphilic graft copolymer of poly(ethylene oxide) as main chain and poly(methyl acrylate) as graft chains is successfully prepared by combination of anionic copolymerization with atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP). The glycidol is protected by ethyl vinyl ether first, then obtained 2,3-epoxypropyl-1-ethoxyethyl ether (EPEE) is copolymerized with EO by initiation of mixture of diphenylmethyl potassium and triethylene glycol to give the well-defined poly(EO-co-EPEE), the latter is deprotected in the acidic conditions, then the recovered copolymer [(poly(EO-co-Gly)] with multi-pending hydroxyls is esterified with 2-bromoisobutyryl bromide to produce the ATRP macroinitiator with multi-pending activated bromides [poly(EO-co-Gly)_(ATRP)] to initiate the polymerization of methyl acrylate (MA). The object products and intermediates are characterized by NMR, MALDI-TOF-MS, FT-IR, and SEC in detail. In solution polymerization, the molecular weight distribution of the graft copolymers is rather narrow (M_w/M_n < 1.2), and the linear dependence of Ln [M₀]/[M] on time demonstrates that the MA polymerization is well controlled.     

Effects of micelle structures formed in selective solvents on crystallization behaviors of poly(ethylene glycol)-b-poly(styrene) copolymers

Well-defined amphiphilic block copolymers, poly(ethylene glycol) methyl ether-b-poly(styrene) (mPEG-b-PS), in which the PS blocks had different molecular weights, were synthesized by atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP). Through introduction of selective solvents for the blocks, crystalline and amorphous blocks were self-assembled into different micelle structures in solutions. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) was used to characterize the micelle structures. It was observed that spherical micelles were always formed, whereas lamellar aggregates appeared only in the PS-selective solvent when the molecular weight of the PS block in mPEG-b-PS was low. The crystallizable mPEG blocks were self-assembled into either the core or corona of the micelles formed. The effects of the self-assembled structures on the crystallization behavior of mPEG blocks were then investigated with differential scanning calorimeter (DSC). When the PS molecular weight was much larger than that of mPEG, the result showed that the crystallinity of the mPEG block was lower when mPEG blocks crystallized in the corona than that in the core of the micelles. In this case, when mPEG blocks crystallized in micelle coronae, the micelle core formed by insoluble PS blocks was very big, so mPEG chains had to distribute sparsely in the micelle coronae. It was hard for mPEG chains in one micelle or among different micelles to gather together to crystallize. However, when the PS molecular weight was lower than that of mPEG, the crystallinity of mPEG was higher when the mPEG chains crystallized in the micelle corona, as the core formed by insoluble PS was small and the mPEG chains in the corona were easy to aggregate and crystallize.     

Epoxy resin containing poly(ethylene oxide)-block-poly(?-caprolactone) diblock copolymer: Effect of curing agents on nanostructures

An amphiphilic diblock copolymer, poly(ethylene oxide)-block-poly(?-caprolactone) (PEO-b-PCL) was synthesized via the ring-opening polymerization of ?-caprolactone in the presence of a hydroxyl-terminated poly(ethylene oxide) monomethyl ether. The diblock copolymer was incorporated into epoxy thermosets. It is found that the formation of nanostructures of thermosetting blends is quite dependent on the uses of aromatic amine hardeners. For 4,4′-methylenebis(2-chloroaniline) (MOCA)-cured thermosetting system, the homogeneous morphology was obtained at the compositions investigated. Nonetheless, the nanostructured thermosets were obtained when the blends were cured with 4,4′-diaminodiphenylsulfone (DDS). The differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) showed that the nanostructured thermosets did not displayed any crystallinity although the subchains of the diblock copolymer are crystalline. The nanostructures were evidenced by means of atomic force microscopy (AFM), small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The dependence of morphological structures on the types of aromatic amines for epoxy and PEO-b-PCL thermosetting blends were interpreted on the basis of the difference in hydrogen bonding interactions resulting from the structure of curing agents. Considering the complete miscibility of the subchains (viz. PEO and PCL) with the precursors of epoxy resin before curing, it is judged that the formation of the nanostructures in the thermosets follows the mechanism of reaction-induced microphase separation, which is in marked contrast to the mechanism of self-assembly, i.e., micelle structures of block copolymers are formed prior to curing, followed by fixing these nanostructures via curing.     

Crystallization and morphology of starch-g-poly(1,4-dioxan-2-one) copolymers

The thermal transition, crystallization and spherulitic morphology of starch-g-poly(1,4-dioxan-2-one) copolymers were studied by means of differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and polarized optical micrographs (PM). It is found that the graft structures of copolymers have obvious effects on the thermal and crystallization behaviors. Because there were more defect sites in the crystalline phase originating from the short grafted chains of poly(1,4-dioxan-2-one) (PPDO), the crystal structure of the copolymers was much less perfect than that of PPDO. PM revealed that the spherulitic morphology of the graft copolymers depended on graft structures and crystallization temperatures. From the single polarized micrograph of the graft copolymers it was observed clearly that the starch segments acted as nucleation sites. The Avrami equation was used to analyze the overall isothermal crystallization of the graft copolymers. Avrami exponents were almost constant at crystallization temperatures T_c ranging from 45 to 60 °C. Both the PM observation and the DSC investigation (crystallization rate constant, K values) indicated that the graft copolymers crystallize faster than pure PPDO, especially at higher crystallization temperatures.     

Synthesis of poly(ethylene oxide)-block-poly(methyl methacrylate)-block-polystyrene triblock copolymers by two-step atom transfer radical polymerization

The synthesis of ABC triblock copolymer poly(ethylene oxide)-block-poly(methyl methacrylate)-block-polystyrene (PEO-b-PMMA-b-PS) via atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) is reported. First, a PEO-Br macroinitiator was synthesized by esterification of PEO with 2-bromoisobutyryl bromide, which was subsequently used in the preparation of halo-terminated poly(ethylene oxide)-block-poly(methyl methacrylate) (PEO-b-PMMA) diblock copolymers under ATRP conditions. Then PEO-b-PMMA-b-PS triblock copolymer was synthesized by ATRP of styrene using PEO-b-PMMA as a macroinitiator. The structures and molecular characteristics of the PEO-b-PMMA-b-PS triblock copolymers were studied by FT-IR, GPC and ¹H NMR.     

Block copolymers comprising poly(ethylene oxide) and poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate) blocks: synthesis and characterization

Monofunctional poly(ethylene oxide) macroinitiators with a molecular weight of 2000, 5000, 10?000, 20?000 and bifunctional poly(ethylene oxide) macroinitiators with a molecular weight of 20?000 were used for the atom transfer radical polymerisation (ATRP) of hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) in ethylene glycol as a solvent. The polymerisation proceeds in a controlled way up to high conversions. The molecular weight of the obtained copolymers increases linearly with conversion. A high rate of polymerisation was observed for the ATRP of HEMA. The effect of the poly(ethylene oxide) moiety on the course of the reaction is limited to solvating effects. The surface analysis of poly(ethylene oxide)/poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate) block copolymers by means of atomic force microscopy in tapping mode using phase imaging shows phase separated domains with characteristic features related to the volume fraction of the respective blocks.     

Synthesis of (ABCB)n type ternary amphiphilic multiblock copolymer via poly(ethylene oxide) macro-chain transfer agent

A novel (ABCB)_n type ternary amphiphilic multiblock copolymer was synthesized by stepwise insertion of monomers into the trithiocarbonate-embedded poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) macro-chain transfer agent (PEO-CTA)_n. (PEO-CTA)_n was synthesized first by coupling of α,ω-dihydroxyl PEO with dicarboxylic trithiocarbonate, then styrene (St) and t-butyl acrylate (^tBA) were inserted into the (PEO-CTA)_n successively to yield (PEO-b-PS)_n and (PEO-b-PS-b-P^tBA-b-PS)_n, respectively. After hydrolysis of the (PEO-b-PS-b-P^tBA-b-PS)_n, the final product (PEO-b-PS-b-PAA-b-PS)_n was obtained.     

Nanostructured thermosets from epoxy and poly(2,2,2-trifluoroethyl acrylate)-block-poly(glycidyl methacrylate) diblock copolymer: Demixing of reactive blocks and thermomechanical properties

Poly(2,2,2-trifluoroethyl acrylate)-block-poly(glycidyl methacrylate) (PTFEA-b-PGMA) diblock copolymer was synthesized via sequential reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization. The reactive diblock copolymer was incorporated into epoxy to obtain the nanostructured thermosets. The morphology of the thermosets was investigated by means of atomic force microscopy (AFM) and small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS). It is identified that the demixing of the reactive subchain (viz. PGMA) out of epoxy matrix occurred in the process of curing reaction, which exerted a profound impact on the glass transition temperatures of the nanostructured thermosets. The static contact angle measurements showed that the nanostructured thermosets displayed a significant enhancement in surface hydrophobicity as well as a reduction in surface free energy. The improvement in surface properties was attributed to the enrichment of the fluorine-containing block (i.e., PTFEA) of amphiphilic diblock copolymer on the surface of the thermosets, which was further evidenced by surface atomic force microscopy (AFM). The measurement of critical stress intensity factor (K_1C) showed that the fracture toughness of the materials was significantly enhanced by the inclusion of a small amount of PTFEA-b-PGMA diblock copolymer.     

Miscibility and crystallization of poly(ethylene oxide) and poly(ε-caprolactone) blends

Blends of poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) with poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL), both semicrystalline polymers, were prepared by co-dissolving the two polyesters in chloroform and casting the mixture. Phase contrast microscopy was used to probe the miscibility of PEOB/PCL blends. Experimental results indicated that PEO was immiscible with PCL because the melt was biphasic. Crystallization of PEO/PCL blends was studied by differential scanning calorimetry and analyzed by the Avrami equation. The crystallization rate of PEO decreased with the increase of PCL in the blends while the crystallization mechanism did not change. In the case of the isothermal crystallization of PCL, the crystallization mechanism did not change, and the change in the crystallization rate was not very big, or almost constant with the addition of PEO, compared with the change of the crystallization rate of PEO.     

Crystalline structures in ultrathin poly(ethylene oxide)/poly(methyl methacrylate) blend films

Amorphous poly(ethylene oxide)/poly(methyl methacrylate) (PEO/PMMA) blend films in extremely constrained states are meta-stable and phase separation of fractal-like branched patterns happens in them due to heterogeneously nucleated PEO crystallization by diffusion-limited aggregation. The crystalline branches are viewed flat-on with PEO chains oriented normal to the substrate surface, upon increasing PMMA content the branch width remains invariant but thickness increases. It is revealed that PMMA imposes different effects on PEO crystallization, i.e. the length and thickness of branches, depending on the film composition.     

Experimental verification on upper critical solution temperature (UCST) behavior in blend of poly(2,6-dimethyl p-phenylene oxide) with poly(4-methyl styrene)

Rare upper critical solution temperature (UCST) behavior was found and experimentally demonstrated in the blend comprising poly(2,6-dimethyl p-phenylene oxide) with poly(4-methyl styrene) (PPO/P4MS). Complexity of phase behavior in the PPO/P4MS system has caused puzzling analyses in the past years. This study re-investigated and clarified past mis-interpretations related to this interesting blend system. This study concluded that the PPO/P4MS blend is an immiscible system at ambient, which, however, turns into a miscible phase with UCST behavior at higher temperatures. With the finding of UCST in the PPO/P4MS blend, a critical contribution of this work was to resolve the conflicting arguments that have gone on for a long time in determination and interpretation of the thermodynamic phase behavior of PPO/P4MS. Phase behavior with UCST in the PPO/P4MS blend system and its interpretation were supported with clear experimental evidence.     

Crystallization and unusual rheological behavior in poly(ethylene oxide)-clay nanocomposites

We report a systematic study of the crystallization and rheological behavior of poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO)-clay nanocomposites. To that end a series of nanocomposites based on PEOs of different molecular weight (10³ < MW < 10⁵ g/mol) and clay surface modifier was synthesized and characterized. Incorporation of organoclays with polar (MMT-OH) or aromatic groups (MMT-Ar) suppresses the crystallization of polymer chains in low MW PEO, but does not significantly affect the crystallization of high MW matrices. In addition, the relative complex viscosity of the nanocomposites based on low MW PEO increases significantly, but the effect is less pronounced at higher MWs. The viscosity increases in the series MMT-Alk < MMT-OH < MMT-Ar. In contrast to the neat PEO which exhibits a monotonic decrease of viscosity with temperature, all nanocomposites show an increase after a certain temperature. This is the first report of such dramatic enhancements in the viscoelasticity of nanocomposites, which are reversible, are based on a simple polymer matrix and are true in a wide temperature range.     

Miscibility and crystallization in crystalline/crystalline blends of poly(butylene succinate)/poly(ethylene oxide)

Miscibility and crystallization behavior have been investigated in blends of poly(butylene succinate) (PBSU) and poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO), both semicrystalline polymers, by differential scanning calorimetry and optical microscopy. Experimental results indicate that PBSU is miscible with PEO as shown by the existence of single composition dependent glass transition temperature over the entire composition range. In addition, the polymer-polymer interaction parameter, obtained from the melting depression of the high-T_m component PBSU using the Flory-Huggins equation, is composition dependent, and its value is always negative. This indicates that PBSU/PEO blends are thermodynamically miscible in the melt. The morphological study of the isothermal crystallization at 95 °C (where only PBSU crystallized) showed the similar crystallization behavior as in amorphous/crystalline blends. Much more attention has been paid to the crystallization and morphology of the low-T_m component PEO, which was studied through both one-step and two-step crystallization. It was found that the crystallization of PEO was affected clearly by the presence of the crystals of PBSU formed through different crystallization processes. The two components crystallized sequentially not simultaneously when the blends were quenched from the melt directly to 50 °C (one-step crystallization), and the PEO spherulites crystallized within the matrix of the crystals of the preexisted PBSU phase. Crystallization at 95 °C followed by quenching to 50 °C (two-step crystallization) also showed the similar crystallization behavior as in one-step crystallization. However, the radial growth rate of the PEO spherulites was reduced significantly in two-step crystallization than in one-step crystallization.     

Ionic conductivity in polyethylene-b-poly(ethylene oxide)/lithium perchlorate solid polymer electrolytes

The ionic conductivity and phase arrangement of solid polymeric electrolytes based on the block copolymer polyethylene-b-poly(ethylene oxide) (PE-b-PEO) and LiClO₄ have been investigated. One set of electrolytes was prepared from copolymers with 75% of PEO units and another set was based on a blend of copolymer with 50% PEO units and homopolymers. The differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) results, for electrolytes based on the copolymer with 75% of PEO units, were dominated by the PEO phase. The PEO block crystallinity dropped and the glass transition increased with salt addition due to the coordination of the cation by PEO oxygen. The conductivity for copolymers 75% PEO-based electrolyte with 15 wt% of salt was higher than 10⁻⁵ S/cm at room temperature and reached to 10⁻³ S/cm at 100 °C on a heating measurement. The blend of PE-b-PEO (50% PEO)/PEO/PE showed a complex thermal behavior with decoupled melting of the blocks and the homopolymers. Upon salt addition the endotherms associated with PEO domains disappeared and the PE crystals remained untouched. The conductivity results were limited at 100 °C to values close to 10⁻⁴ S/cm and at room temperature values close to 3 × 10⁻⁶ S/cm were obtained for the 15 wt% salt electrolyte. Raman study showed that the ionic association of the highly concentrated blend electrolytes at room temperature is not significant. Therefore, the lower values of conductivity in the case of the blend with 50% PEO can be assigned to the higher content of PE domains leading to a morphology with lower connectivity for ionic conduction both in the crystalline and melted state of the PE domains.     

Synthesis of graft copolymer polyethylene‐ graft‐poly(ethylene oxide) by a new anionic graft‐from polymerization

A series of amphiphilic graft copolymers, PE‐graft‐PEO, containing hydrophobic polyethylene (PE) as the backbone and hydrophilic poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) as the side‐chain, have been synthesized by a novel route. The graft structure and the molecular weight, as well as the molecular weight distribution of the graft copolymer can easily be controlled. The molecular weight of the side‐chain PEO is proportional to the reaction time and the monomer concentration, which indicates the ‘living’ character of the anionic polymerization of ethylene oxide. The produced copolymers PE‐graft‐PEO were characterized by ¹H NMR and DSC measurements. Copyright © 2004 Society of Chemical Industry     

Crystallization behavior of star-shaped poly(ethylene oxide) with cubic silsesquioxane (CSSQ) core

The crystallization behavior of well-defined star-shaped cubic silsesquioxane-poly(ethylene oxide) (CSSQ-PEO) and linear PEO were studied in terms of differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and wide-angle X-ray scattering (WAXS). It was found in DSC analysis that the glass transition temperature (T_g) and the crystallization temperature (T_c) of CSSQ-PEO are different from those of linear PEO. The presence of CSSQ in PEO reduced the overall crystallization growth rate. This effect can be ascribed to the reduction of the mobility of the PEO crystallites in the presence of CSSQ and the star structure of the polymer. The Ozawa method is qualitatively satisfactory for describing the nonisothermal crystallizations of linear PEO and CSSQ-PEO. The presence of CSSQ leads to the diffusion- and nucleation-controlled mechanisms in the crystallization process of CSSQ-PEO whilst only the nucleation-controlled mechanism was observed in the case of linear PEO. The apparent activation energy required for crystallization was calculated using the Kissinger method. The isothermal crystallization morphology of PEO and CSSQ-PEO were also examined by cross-polarizing optical microscopy (CPOM). The CPOM images indicated the spherulite growth is slower in CSSQ-PEO as compared to linear PEO. It was also investigated that more number of PEO spherulites in CSSQ-PEO were observed, which sizes are markedly smaller than the spherulites developed in linear PEO. Wide-angle X-ray scattering (WAXS) studies showed that the crystallization peaks for linear PEO and CSSQ-PEO appeared at different temperature revealing the crystallization process and crystal growth rate are different from each other. However, no significant distortion of the crystal structure of PEO was evaluated in the presence of CSSQ.     

Double-responsive core-shell-corona micelles from self-assembly of diblock copolymer of poly(t-butyl acrylate-co-acrylic acid)-b-poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)

Self-assembly of poly(t-butyl acrylate-co-acrylic acid)-b-poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) [P(tBA-co-AA)-b-PNIPAM], which was obtained from part hydrolysis of PtBA-b-PNIPAM synthesized by sequential atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) was studied. Thermo- and pH-responsive core-shell-corona (CSC) micelles with different structures were formed from (PtBA-co-PAA)-b-PNIPAM in aqueous solution. At pH 5.8 and 25 °C, the block copolymer self-assembled into spherical core-shell micelles with hydrophobic PtBA segments as the core, hydrophilic PAA/PNIPAM segments as the mixed shell. Increasing temperatures, core-shell micelles converted into CSC micelles with PtBA as the core, collapsed PNIPAM as the shell and soluble PAA as the corona. Moreover, decreasing pH at 25 °C, PAA chains collapsed onto the core resulting in CSC micelles with PtBA as the core, PAA as the shell and PNIPAM as the corona.     

Crystallization of poly(ethylene imine) amorphous sample in water vapor atmosphere

Infrared spectral measurement was carried out to find the crystallization of the amorphous poly(ethylene imine) (PEI) sample into the hydrates by absorbing water molecules. When PEI sample was melted and cooled to room temperature in dry state, it was found to crystallize into the anhydrate consisting of doubly stranded helices. But when the sample was melted and subjected to the humid atmosphere at the same temperature, the formation of hydrates was found to occur. The hydrates were considered to have higher melting points than the anhydrate, in other words, they were more stable than the anhydrate in higher temperature region.     

Miscibility with positive deviation in Tg-composition relationship in blends of poly(2-vinyl pyridine)-block-poly(ethylene oxide) and poly(p-vinyl phenol)

Phase behavior and miscibility with positive deviation from linear T_g-composition relationship in a copolymer/homopolymer blend system, poly(2-vinyl pyridine)-block-poly(ethylene oxide) (P2VP-b-PEO)/poly(p-vinyl phenol) (PVPh), were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) and solid-state ¹³C nuclear magnetic resonance (¹³C NMR), optical microscopy (OM), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Optical and electron microscopy results as well as NMR proton spin-lattice relaxation times in laboratory frame () all confirmed the miscibility as judged by the T_g criterion using DSC. In comparison to the literature result on a homopolymer/homopolymer blend of P2VP/PVPh, fitting with the Kwei equation on the T_g-composition relationship for the block-copolymer/homopolymer blend of P2VP-b-PEO/PVPh blend system yielded a smaller q value (q = 120) for P2VP-b-PEO/PVPh than that for P2VP/PVPh blend (q = 160). The FT-IR and ¹³C NMR results revealed hydrogen-bonding interactions between the pendant pyridine group of P2VP-b-PEO and phenol unit in PVPh, which is responsible for the noted positive deviation of the T_g-composition relationship. Comparison of the shifts of hydroxyl IR absorbance band, reflecting the average strength of H-bonding, indicates a decreasing order of P2VP/PVPh > P2VP-b-PEO/PVPh > PEO/PVPh blends. The PEO block in the copolymer segment tends to defray the interaction strength in the P2VP-b-PEO/PVPh blends because of relative weaker interaction between PEO and PVPh than that between P2VP and PVPh pairs. A comparative ternary (P2VP/PEO)/PVPh blend was also studied as the controlling experiments for comparison to the P2VP-b-PEO/PVPh blend. The thermal behavior and interaction strength in (P2VP/PEO)/PVPh ternary blends are discussed with those in the P2VP-b-PEO/PVPh copolymer/homopolymer blend.