A phase I-II study of paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and vinorelbine with filgrastim (rhG-CSF) support in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE: We designed a phase I-II trial of three active agents, paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and vinorelbine, in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to: 1) define the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of paclitaxel with filgrastim (G-CSF) support; and 2) determine the overall response rate and median survival of patients treated on this regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We treated cohorts of patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC with ifosfamide 1.2-1.6 g/m2/day x 3 and vinorelbine 20-25 mg/m2/day x 3 and escalating doses of paclitaxel at 100-175 mg/m2 on day 2 with G-CSF support on a 21-day cycle. One prior experimental single-agent chemotherapy regimen was allowed. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients, were enrolled on this trial: 27 on the phase I portion of the study and an additional 29 at the recommended phase II dose (RPTD). Thirteen patients had received prior chemotherapy. Paclitaxel doses of 175 mg/m2 and 150 mg/m2 produced dose-limiting myelosuppression, and the RPTD was determined to be paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 with ifosfamide 1.2 g/m2/day on days 1-3 and vinorelbine 20 mg/m2/ day on days 1-3 with G-CSF support. The overall response rate was 18%, with a median survival of 6.1 months. Six of 35 patients (17%) treated at the RPTD achieved a partial response to therapy. Grade IV neutropenia was observed in 19 of 35 patients at this dose, with eight patients suffering febrile neutropenia. CONCLUSIONS: This non-cisplatin-containing three-drug regimen has substantial toxicity and low activity in advanced NSCLC, and does not seem to improve on prior regimens. It is unclear whether the lack of efficacy relates to an antagonistic reaction between the specific drugs, administration schedule, or to subtherapeutic doses of the individual agents.     

Paclitaxel by 96-hour continuous infusion in combination with cisplatin: a phase I trial in patients with advanced lung cancer

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of paclitaxel administered by 96-hour continuous infusion in combination with cisplatin, to determine if the addition of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) permits significant paclitaxel dose escalation, and to assess the toxicity and preliminary activity of this combination in patients with advanced lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty patients with untreated lung cancer were enrolled: 42 had advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and eight had extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Patients received paclitaxel doses of 100 to 180 mg/m2/96 hours and cisplatin doses of 60 to 80 mg/m2 as a single 30-minute bolus injection at the end of the paclitaxel infusion. RESULTS: Two of six patients experienced dose-limiting neutropenia at a dose of paclitaxel 140 mg/m2/96 hours and cisplatin 80 mg/m2. With G-CSF support, one of three patients experienced both dose-limiting mucositis and fatal neutropenic sepsis at a dose of paclitaxel 180 mg/m2/96 hours and cisplatin 80 mg/m2. Significant peripheral neuropathy developed in five patients and occurred after six or more cycles of therapy. Thirty-three of 42 patients with NSCLC had measurable disease; the objective response rate was 55%, with two complete responses and 16 partial responses. For all 42 patients with NSCLC, the median time to progression and median survival duration were 5 months and 10 months, respectively. The actuarial 1-year survival rate was 41%. Of eight SCLC patients, four responded to therapy, and the median survival duration for all SCLC patients was 11 months. CONCLUSION: The MTD without G-CSF is paclitaxel 120 mg/m2/96 hours and cisplatin 80 mg/m2, and the MTD with G-CSF is paclitaxel 160 mg/m2/96 hours and cisplatin 80 mg/m2. Infusional paclitaxel with cisplatin is well tolerated and active in patients with advanced NSCLC.     

Exercise testing and prognosis in adult cystic fibrosis

PURPOSE: The objective of our study was to determine the maximum tolerable doses (MTDs) of both paclitaxel and cisplatin when given in a weekly schedule alone or simultaneously with G-CSF in advanced solid neoplasms. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced cancer either chemotherapy-naive or resistant to standard treatments received paclitaxel in a three-hour infusion followed by cisplatin, with or without the addition of r-HuG-CSF (5 micrograms/kg s.c. days three to five). The starting doses of CDDP and paclitaxel were 25 mg/m2/week and 45 mg/m2/week, respectively. During the first six courses the dosages of the two drugs were alternately escalated by 20% (CDDP = 5 mg/m2/week, and paclitaxel 10 mg/m2/week) at each step until the appearance of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in one-third or more of the patients enrolled in that cohort. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients with cancer (16 lung, 16 breast, 11 ovarian, 7 head and neck, 1 renal, 1 esophageal, 1 cervical, 1 soft-tissue sarcoma, and 1 of unknown primary), 25 of whom were pretreated, were entered into the study. A total of 439 weekly courses were delivered. In chemotherapy-na?ve patients, the MTDs of cisplatin and paclitaxel were 30 mg/m2/week and 65 mg/m2/week, respectively, in the absence of G-CSF support, which increased to 40 mg/m2/week and 85 mg/m2/week, respectively, when G-CSF was given. There were no toxic deaths in this study. Neutropenia was the main dose-limiting toxicity (100/439 courses), but was seldom severe. Neurotoxicity was quite frequent (18 of 55 patients for the total of 88 courses) but never dose-limiting. It was more frequent and clinically relevant in cisplatin-pretreated patients. Overall 18 patients (eight ovarian, five breast, three lung, and two head and neck) achieved objective responses. CONCLUSIONS: The cisplatin-paclitaxel weekly administration seems a safe, practical and effective therapeutical approach in patients with advanced solid neoplasms. Large phase II trials are warranted to accurately define the efficacy of this schedule in cisplatin-paclitaxel sensitive tumors.     

Combination chemotherapy with mitoguazon, ifosfamide, MTX, etoposide (MIME) and G-CSF can efficiently mobilize PBPC in patients with Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

Many centers use CY and G-CSF to mobilize PBPC. In this study we explored whether a standard chemotherapy regimen consisting of mitoguazon, ifosfamide, MTX and etoposide (MIME) combined with G-CSF was capable of mobilizing PBPC in lymphoma patients. Twelve patients with Hodgkin's disease (HD) and 38 patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) were mobilized with MIME/G-CSF. Most patients were heavily treated with different chemotherapy regimens receiving a median of 11 cycles (range 3 to 20) of chemotherapy prior to mobilization. It was found that the optimal time of PBPC harvest was at days 12 and 13 after initiating the mobilization regimen. The median number of collected CD34+ cells per kg body weight was 7.1 x 10(6) (range 0.5-26.2). More than 2.0 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg were achieved in 69% of the patients after one apheresis. When additional cycles of apheresis were done, only 6% failed to harvest this number of CD34+ cells. There was a statistically significant inverse correlation between the number of prior chemotherapy cycles and CD34+ cell yield (P = 0.003). No such association was found between CD34+ cell yield and prior radiotherapy. When MIME/G-CSF was compared with Dexa-BEAM/G-CSF, it was found that MIME/G-CSF tended to be more efficient in mobilizing PBPC in spite of being less myelotoxic. All patients transplanted with MIME/G-CSF mobilized PBPC had fast and sustained engraftment. These results demonstrate that an ordinary salvage chemotherapy regimen, such as MIME combined with G-CSF can be successfully used to mobilize PBPC.     

Treatment of patients with transitional-cell carcinoma of the urothelial tract with ifosfamide, paclitaxel, and cisplatin: a phase II trial

PURPOSE: A phase II trial of ifosfamide, paclitaxel, and cisplatin (ITP) was conducted in previously untreated patients with advanced transitional-cell carcinoma (TCC) to assess its efficacy and toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty patients with metastatic or unresectable TCC were treated with ifosfamide 1.5 g/m2/d for 3 days with paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 over 3 hours and cisplatin 70 mg/m2 on day 1 of each 28-day treatment cycle. Therapy was continued for a maximum of six cycles. Prophylactic hematopoietic growth factor (recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor [rhG-CSF]) was given on days 6 to 17 of each cycle. RESULTS: Twenty-three of 29 assessable patients (79%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 60% to 92%) demonstrated a major response (six complete [CR] and 17 partial [PR]) with response durations that ranged from 5 to 24+ months. Five patients with T4 bladder primary tumors had a major response, two with pathologic CR. At a median follow-up duration of 17.9 months, nine (31%) patients remain disease-free (range, 10+ to 24+). Hematologic toxicity included anemia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia; febrile neutropenia was observed in 17% of patients and 4% of cycles. No grade 4 nonhematologic toxicity was observed. Grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity included alopecia, allergy (3%), renal insufficiency (13%), and neuropathy (10%). Dose reductions or drug omissions were necessary for adverse events in seven (23%) patients. CONCLUSION: ITP is an active, well-tolerated regimen in previously untreated patients with TCC of the urothelial tract. Further study of this regimen in patients with both TCC and non-transitional-cell urothelial tumors is ongoing.     

Effect of topical oral G-CSF on oral mucositis: a randomised placebo-controlled trial

Oral mucositis is a dose-limiting toxicity of intensive chemotherapy. It is caused directly by the cytotoxic effect of chemotherapeutic agents and indirectly by sustained neutropenia. Severe oral mucositis is an important predisposing factor for life-threatening septic complications during aplasia. It also reduces quality of life. At present, no effective causal prophylaxis or treatment against oral mucositis is established. We performed a prospective randomised placebo-controlled trial using topical oral r-metHuG-CSF (filgrastim) in high-grade lymphoma patients treated according to the B-NHL protocol, which contains high-dose methotrexate and causes severe oral mucositis (WHO grades I-IV) in >50% of patients. Between August 1996 and July 1997, a total of 32 chemotherapy cycles were documented in eight patients (four male, four female). Mucosal erythema and ulceration were recorded. All patients assessed their oral pain and impact on swallowing daily, using a subjective scale from no to maximal discomfort (1-10). In addition, oral mucositis was assessed according to the WHO score. Filgrastim was administered in 16 cycles as a viscous mouthrinse (carboxymethylcellulose 2%, oleum citrii) 4 x 120 microg/day from days 10 to 16. Sixteen cycles were given to control patients, of these 14 with placebo, and another two cycles with no treatment. Severe mucositis (WHO grade III/IV) was documented in 21 of 32 cycles (65.5%). A difference of borderline significance was observed for the reduction of maximum severity of oral mucositis between G-CSF vs placebo (P = 0.058), with a reduction of WHO grade IV of 50% (four G-CSF vs eight control). The number of days in hospital was reduced significantly in the G-CSF group (P = 0.02). In conclusion, topical oral G-CSF mouthrinses may be beneficial to reduce oral mucositis.     

High-dose ifosfamide plus adriamycin in the treatment of adult advanced soft tissue sarcomas: is it feasible?

BACKGROUND: Adriamycin (ADM) and ifosfamide (IFO) are the two most active agents in the treatment of soft tissue sarcomas (STS) with a clear dose-response relationship. We evaluated the feasibility and toxicity of a high-dose IFO-plus-ADM combination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fourteen patients with advanced disease and nine patients in adjuvant setting received IFO 12.5 g/m2 in 120-hour continuous infusion with Mesna uroprotection and ADM 20 mg/m2 on days 1-3 and G-CSF every three weeks. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients received 89 chemotherapy cycles (70 cycles at full dose). Seventeen patients received the planned treatment, and nine patients required dose reductions. We observed grade 3-4 neutropenia in 52 cycles (59%)/20 patients; grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia in 16 cycles (18%)/nine patients; grade 3-4 anaemia in 24 cycles (27%)/11 patients. Eight patients experienced febrile neutropenia and six patients required blood transfusions. CONCLUSIONS: While feasible, this regimen showed heavy toxicity. Nevertheless, 74% of the patients were able to complete the planned treatment. Adjustment of the schedule of IFO continuous infusion to improve this combination is currently under investigation.     

G-CSF stimulated donor granulocyte collections for neutropenic sepsis

Granulocyte transfusions may be beneficial in neutropenic patients with progressive infections despite appropriate antibiotics. In order to evaluate both the feasibility of granulocyte collection in normal donors receiving granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and the efficacy of infusing these cells into neutropenic patients with progressive sepsis, four donors received between 5-10 micrograms/kg G-CSF per day and underwent leucapheresis within a day of the first dose. Different red cell sedimenting agents and interface settings were evaluated to determine the optimal method of granulocyte collection. The number of granulocytes collected, the peripheral blood granulocyte level in the recipient at various time points after infusion, and the clinical response were evaluated. Results showed that G-CSF and the leucaphereses caused mild to moderate fatigue in two donors and profound fatigue and a brief episode of hypoxia in one donor. Efficient granulocyte collections were only obtained using dextran 40 or dextran 70 as the sedimenting agent and a deep interface setting which extended sampling into the upper red cell layer. Infusion of granulocytes obtained with this technique resulted in a sustained increase in circulating granulocyte numbers in three recipients, one of whom gained significant clinical benefit. In conclusion, granulocyte transfusions from donors given G-CSF are feasible and may be clinically beneficial, particularly if given early in the course of infection in neutropenic patients.     

Phase II trial of paclitaxel and cisplatin in women with advanced breast cancer: an active regimen with limiting neurotoxicity

PURPOSE: A phase II study of paclitaxel and cisplatin in patients with advanced breast cancer was performed to determine the objective response rate and make further observations about the toxicity of this regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were required to have histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the breast with no more than one chemotherapeutic treatment for advanced disease. Treatment consisted of paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 administered as a 24-hour intravenous (i.v.) infusion followed by cisplatin 75 mg/m2 i.v. Patients received granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) 5 micrograms/kg subcutaneously on day 3 until WBC recovery. Cycles were repeated every 21 days. Patients continued to receive therapy until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: Forty-four patients entered the trial. Forty-two patients were assessable for response. Nineteen patients (43%) had no prior chemotherapy and 41 had no chemotherapy for metastatic disease. The median number of cycles administered per patient was five (range, one to seven). There were five complete responses (CRs) (11.9%) and 17 partial responses (PRs) (40.5%), with an overall response rate of 52.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 36.4% to 68.0%). Nine patients had stage III disease. The response rate for this group was 66.7% (95% CI, 33.0% to 92.5%), with three CRs and three PRs. Among 35 patients with stage IV disease, there were two CRs and 14 PRs, with an overall response rate of 48.5% (95% CI, 30.8% to 66.5%). Overall, the median response duration was 10.6 months. Thirty patients (68%) developed transient grade 4 neutropenia. Cumulative neuropathy was the major dose-limiting toxicity. After five cycles of chemotherapy, 96% of patients had at least grade 1 neurotoxicity and 52% had at least grade 2 neurotoxicity. One patient had a toxic death after cycle 1 of therapy. CONCLUSION: The combination of paclitaxel and cisplatin as first-line chemotherapy for women with advanced breast cancer is an active regimen. However, the cumulative neurotoxicity was significant and dose-limiting in the majority of patients.     

Comparative bioavailability of two oral formulations of ipriflavone in healthy volunteers at steady-state. Evaluation of two different dosage schemes

Because of the relative lack of overlapping toxicity, carboplatin (PPL) and cisplatin (CDDP) can be easily combined for treatment of ovarian cancer to increase total platinum dose intensity. Ifosfamide (IFO), one of the most effective single agents in ovarian cancer, has a low hematological toxicity when administered in continuous infusion. From January 1991 to December 1993, 34 patients with advanced ovarian cancer, previously untreated with chemo- or radiotherapy, were enrolled in a phase I-II study with the aim of determining the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of CDDP (on day 8 of a 28-day cycle) in combination with PPL (300 mg/m2 on day 1) and IFO (4,000 mg/m2/24 h by continuous infusion on day 1). The initial dose level of CDDP was 40 mg/m2, which was continuously increased by 10 mg/m2 up to the MTD defined as one dose level below that inducing dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in at least two-thirds of treated patients; no dose escalation was allowed in the same patient. Grade 3-4 leukopenia and thrombocytopenia were observed in 54 and 49% of patients, respectively. The DLT was reached at 70 mg/m2 and therefore the dose recommended for the phase II study was 60 mg/m2. Complete (CR) plus partial response was observed in 88% of patients with a 21% pathological CR. With a minimum follow-up of 32 months (median 40 months), median progression-free survival and overall survival were 21 and 39 months, respectively. In conclusion, the combination of CDDP, PPL, and IFO provides an effective regimen for ovarian cancer with an acceptable toxicity profile.     

Phase I and pharmacologic study of 9-aminocamptothecin given by 72-hour infusion in adult cancer patients

PURPOSE: To conduct a phase I and pharmacologic study of the new topoisomerase I inhibitor, 9-aminocamptothecin (9-AC). PATIENTS AND MATERIALS: A 72-hour infusion of 9-AC was administered every 14 days to 48 solid-tumor patients at doses of 5 to 59 microg/m2/h without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and 47 to 74 microg/m2/h with G-CSF. RESULTS: Without G-CSF, two of eight patients who received 47 microg/m2/h had dose-limiting neutropenia in their initial cycle, as did both patients who received 59 microg/m2/h (with a platelet count < 25,000/microL in one). With G-CSF, zero of seven patients treated with 47 microg/m2/h had dose-limiting neutropenia in their first cycle, while dose-limiting neutropenia occurred in six of 14 patients (with platelet count < 25,000/microL in five) entered at 59 microg/m2/h. Among 39 patients entered at > or = 25 microg/m2/h 9-AC with or without G-CSF, fatigue, diarrhea, and nausea/vomiting of grade 2 severity ultimately occurred in 54%, 30%, and 38%, respectively, while grade 3 toxicities of each type occurred in 8% of patients. Steady-state 9-AC lactone concentration (Css) increased linearly from 0.89 to 10.6 nmol/L, and correlated strongly with leukopenia ( r = .85). CONCLUSION: The recommended phase II dose of 9-AC given by 72-hour infusion every 2 weeks is 35 microg/m2/h without G-CSF or 47 microg/m2/h with G-CSF support. Dose escalation in individual patients may be possible according to their tolerance.     

Genetic diversity of nifH gene sequences in paenibacillus azotofixans strains and soil samples analyzed by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis of PCR-amplified gene fragments

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), and pharmacokinetic profile of the dolastatin 15 analog LU103793 when administered daily for 5 days every 3 weeks. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-six courses of LU103793 at doses of 0.5 to 3.0 mg/m2 were administered to 26 patients with advanced solid malignancies. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed on days 1 and 5 of course one. Pharmacokinetic variables were related to the principal toxicities. RESULTS: Neutropenia, peripheral edema, and liver function test abnormalities were dose-limiting at doses greater than 2.5 mg/m2 per day. Four of six patients developed DLT at 3.0 mg/m2 per day, whereas two of 12 patients treated at 2.5 mg/m2 per day developed DLT. Pharmacokinetic parameters were independent of dose and similar on days 1 and 5. Volume of distribution at steady-state (Vss) was 7.6 +/- 2.0 L/m2, clearance 0.49 +/- 0.18 L/h/m2, and elimination half-life (t1/2) 12.3 +/- 3.8 hours. Peak concentrations (Cmax) on day 1 related to mean percentage decrement in neutrophils (sigmoid maximum effect (Emax) model). Patients who experienced dose-limiting neutropenia had significantly higher Cmax values than patients who did not, whereas nonhematologic DLTs were more related to dose. CONCLUSION: The recommended dose for phase II evaluations of LU103793 daily for 5 days every 3 weeks is 2.5 mg/m2 per day. The lack of prohibitive cardiovascular effects and the generally acceptable toxicity profile support the rationale for performing disease-directed evaluations of LU103793 on the schedule evaluated in this study.     

Phase I/II study of combined granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor administration for the mobilization of hematopoietic progenitor cells

PURPOSE: To study the toxicity and efficacy of combined granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) administration for mobilization of hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cohorts of a minimum of five patients each were treated subcutaneously as follows: G-CSF 5 micrograms/kg on days 1 to 12 and GM-CSF at .5, 1, or 5 micrograms/kg on days 7 to 12 (cohorts 1, 2, and 3); GM-CSF 5 micrograms/kg on days 1 to 12 and G-CSF 5 micrograms/kg on days 7 to 12 (cohort 4); and G-CSF and GM-CSF 5 micrograms/kg each on days 1 to 12 (cohort 5). Ten-liter aphereses were performed on days 1 (baseline, pre-CSF), 5, 7, 11, and 13. Colony assays for granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming units (CFU-GM) and erythroid burst-forming units (BFU-E) were performed on each harvest. RESULTS: The principal toxicities were myalgias, bone pain, fever, nausea, and mild thrombocytopenia, but none was dose-limiting. Four days of treatment with either G-CSF or GM-CSF resulted in dramatic and sustained increases in the numbers of CFU-GM per kilogram collected per harvest that represented 35.6 +/- 8.9- and 33.7 +/- 13.0-fold increases over baseline, respectively. This increment was attributable both to increased numbers of mononuclear cells collected per 10-L apheresis and to increased concentrations of progenitors within each collection. The administration of G-CSF to patients already receiving GM-CSF (cohort 4) caused the HPC content to surge to nearly 80-fold the baseline (P = .024); the reverse sequence, ie, the addition of GM-CSF to G-CSF, was less effective. The CFU-GM content of the baseline aphereses correlated with the maximal mobilization achieved (r = .74, P = .001). CONCLUSION: Combined G-CSF and GM-CSF administration effectively and predictably mobilizes HPCs and facilitates apheresis.     

Phase I clinical and pharmacologic study of weekly cisplatin combined with weekly irinotecan in patients with advanced solid tumors

PURPOSE: In vitro synergy between cisplatin and irinotecan (CPT-11) has been reported. We designed a combination schedule of these agents to maximize the potential for synergistic interaction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: To maximize the opportunity for synergy, we divided the cisplatin into four consecutive weekly treatments, followed by a 2-week rest. Each dose of cisplatin was immediately followed by a dose of irinotecan. The dose of cisplatin was fixed at 30 mg/m2/wk. The initial irinotecan dose was 50 mg/m2/wk and this was escalated by 30% increments in successive cohorts of three to six patients to establish the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD). Pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and its metabolites, SN-38 and SN-38 glucuronide (SN-38G), were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 35 patients with solid tumors enrolled onto this trial, 30 were assessable for toxicity and response. The MTD for this regimen was 30 mg/m2/wk of cisplatin plus 50 mg/m2/wk of irinotecan in previously treated patients and 30 mg/m2/wk of cisplatin plus 65 mg/m2/wk of irinotecan in chemotherapy-naive patients. Neutropenia was the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) encountered in this trial. Diarrhea was infrequent and rarely dose-limiting. Seven of 30 assessable patients achieved a partial response. No alteration in irinotecan, SN-38, or SN-38G pharmacokinetics resulted from the administration of cisplatin with irinotecan. CONCLUSION: The administration of cisplatin and irinotecan on this weekly schedule provides a practical and well-tolerated regimen that has the potential to maximize any clinical synergy between the two agents. Evidence of substantial clinical activity was seen in this phase I study.     

Analysis of FMR1 and flanking microsatellite markers in normal and fragile X chromosomes in Portugal: evidence for a "protector" haplotype

The authors evaluate the combination of three drugs, vinorelbine, ifosfamide, and cisplatin, which have been shown to produce good response rates and a significant gain in survival when any two of them are given together. Seventy-seven untreated patients with inoperable stage III-IV non-small-cell lung cancer from three centers were included. The combination consisted of cisplatin 30 mg/m2 daily, ifosfamide 1,500 mg/m2 daily, mesna 1,500 mg/m2 daily on days 1-3, and vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 daily on days 1 and 8. Four cycles were administered every 4 weeks for a total of 267 cycles, before an assessment for toxicity, effective dose intensity, response rate, and survival was made. Toxicity was mainly hematologic (grade 3-4 neutropenia (15.7%), anemia (8.2%), and thrombopenia (2.6%)) but did not require granulocyte colony-stimulating factors. Objective response rate was 41.1% (95% confidence interval, 29.5-52.9%) in 68 patients suitable for assessment. The mean time to progression and median survival were 7.7 +/- 1.3 months and 11.6 months, respectively. One-year survival was 47.1%. The effective dose intensity of cisplatin and ifosfamide correlated strongly with survival, whereas stage and performance status did not. This study confirms previously reported favorable results for response and survival rates obtained in stage III-IV non-small-cell lung cancer with the vinorelbine, ifosfamide, and cisplatin combination. Respect of a scheduled dose intensity has a clear-cut influence on survival and should be evaluated routinely in future polychemotherapy trials.     

Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of titanocene dichloride in adults with advanced solid tumors

This Phase I dose-escalation clinical trial of a lyophilized formulation of titanocene dichloride (MKT4) was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose, the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and pharmacokinetics of titanium (Ti) after a single i.v. infusion of MKT4. Forty patients with refractory solid malignancies were treated with a total of 78 courses. Using a modified Fibonacci scheme, 15 mg/m2 initial doses of titanocene dichloride were increased in cohorts of three patients up to level 11 (560 mg/m2) if DLT was not observed. The maximum tolerated dose was 315 mg/m2, and nephrotoxicity was DLT. Two minor responses (bladder carcinoma and non-small cell lung cancer) were observed. The pharmacokinetics of plasma Ti were assessed in 14 treatment courses by atomic absorption spectroscopy. The ratio for the area under the curve(0-infinity) in plasma and whole blood was 1.2. The following pharmacokinetic parameters were determined for plasma, as calculated in a two-compartment model: biological half-life t1/2beta in plasma was 22.8+/-11.2 h (xh +/- pseudo-SD), peak plasma concentration cmax approximately 30 microg/ml at a dose of 420 mg/m2, distribution volume Vss= 5.34+/-2.1 L (xa +/- SD), and a total clearance CItotal = 2.58+/-1.23 ml/min (xa +/- SD). There was a linear correlation between the area under the curve(0-infinity) of Ti in plasma and the titanocene dichloride dose administered with a correlation coefficient r2 of 0.8856. Plasma protein binding of Ti was in the 70-80% range. Between 3% and 16% of the total amount of Ti administered were renally excreted during the first 36 h. The recommended dose for Phase II evaluation is 240 mg/m2 given every 3 weeks with i.v. hydration to reduce renal toxicity.     

Intensified adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil therapy: a dose-finding study for ambulatory patients with breast cancer

Escalating doses of cyclophosphamide were given every 3 weeks as adjuvant treatment for women operated for breast cancer to determine the maximum tolerated dose of cyclophosphamide that can be given with constant doses of methotrexate (40 mg/m2) and 5-FU (600 mg/m2; CMF) as an outpatient treatment without the routine use of granulocyte colony-stimulating growth factor (G-CSF). The dose of cyclophosphamide was increased by 250 mg/m2 starting from the dose of 1,000 mg/m2. Mesna was given to prevent cystitis. The criteria for dose-limiting toxicity were grade IV granulocytopenia lasting for longer than 48 h, granulocytopenic infection or other grade IV toxicities. G-CSF and ofloxacin were used if grade IV granulocytopenia continued for longer than 48 h or if granulocytopenic infection occurred. At the dose level of 1,500 mg/m2 (500 mg/m2/week) 22 (92%) of the 24 patients had grade IV granulocytopenia during the 6 CMF cycles given, but only 3 (13%) had granulocytopenic fever. G-CSF was used in 28% of the cycles at this dose level. Other toxicities included complete alopecia (79%), nausea and vomiting. Sixteen (80%) of the premenopausal women became postmenopausal. At the dose level of 1,750 mg/m2 all 3 patients treated had to be hospitalized after the first cycle due to neutropenic infection (n = 2) or intractable vomiting even though prophylactic G-CSF was used. We conclude that intravenous CMF with a cyclophosphamide dose of 1,500 mg/m2 given at 3-week intervals with the selective use of prophylactic G-CSF is feasible as adjuvant treatment for patients with breast cancer.     

Radiotherapy and concomitant weekly 1-hour infusion of paclitaxel in the treatment of head and neck cancer--results from a Phase I trial

PURPOSE: To define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) by describing the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of weekly paclitaxel (PAC) given as a 1-h I.V. infusion in patients with head and neck cancer concomitant to irradiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with unresectable or incompletely resected head and neck cancer were enrolled into a prospective, dose-escalating Phase I study. Toxicity was graded according to the WHO toxicity score. MTD dose was defined when two out of six patients developed DLT. The starting dose of PAC was 20 mg/m2 once weekly I.V. over 60 min, with a subsequent dose escalation of 10 mg/m2 in cohorts of three new patients. Radiation therapy was administered in three field technique over 6-7 weeks in 2.0 Gy/daily fractions for 5 consecutive days/week up to total doses of 60-70 Gy. RESULTS: From 1994-1996, 18 patients completing three dose levels were included into the study. Altogether, 101 courses of chemotherapy were evaluable for toxicity. On the second dose level (30 mg/m2) one of three patients experienced DLT with Grade IV mucositis. On the next dose level with 40 mg/m2 PAC weekly one patient experienced DLT being prolonged Grade III mucositis. From the following three patients required, two patients showed no DLT. The third patient showed mucositis of WHO Grade 4 and died from hemorrhage caused by a rupture of the a pharyngeal wall. Dose level 2 (30 mg/m2) was repeated and one of the three newly treated patients again suffered from mucositis WHO Grade 4. CONCLUSION: When PAC is given weekly as a 1-h infusion concomitant to radiotherapy, MTD is 30 mg/m2 with mucositis being DLT; hematological and further nonhematological toxicity is mild.     

Oviposition and incubation environmental effects on embryonic diapause in a ground cricket

PURPOSE: Recent studies document the value of early combined modality therapy of small cell lung cancer, but also indicate that early thoracic radiation adds to myelosuppression and can complicate further chemotherapy. Other studies indicate that simultaneous use of growth factors with thoracic radiation may be deleterious. However, temporal separation of growth factor use from cytotoxic therapy may allow dose intensity to be maintained/enhanced during combined modality treatment. We sought to integrate filgrastim into a novel chemoradiation regimen for patients with limited small cell lung cancer using an approach that separated growth factor administration from both chemotherapy and thoracic radiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty-seven patients with limited disease small cell lung cancer were enrolled in a Phase I trial of cisplatin, ifosfamide/mesna, oral etoposide, and thoracic radiation (1.5 Gy b.i.d. x 30 fractions days 1-19 cycle 1) +/- filgrastim (5 microg/kg/day). Filgrastim was given on days 20-25 of cycle 1 after completion of radiation and following completion of oral etoposide in subsequent cycles. The primary end point was determination of maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of chemotherapy. Serial cohorts were treated with and without filgrastim. RESULTS: Because of dose-limiting thrombocytopenia, primarily, and nonhematologic toxicity, the MTDs with and without filgrastim were identical (cisplatin 20 mg/m2 i.v. and ifosfamide 1200 mg/m2 i.v., both given days 1-3, and etoposide 40 mg/m2 p.o. days 1-14). Filgrastim use shortened the duration of neutropenia at the MTD (median 4 vs. 7 days), but was not associated with a reduction in febrile neutropenia. Although growth factor administration did not allow dose escalation of this regimen, it did allow chemotherapy doses to be maintained at the MTD more frequently through four cycles of therapy. In the 24 evaluable patients, the overall response rate was 100% (71% partial and 29% complete). CONCLUSIONS: Despite careful attention to the timing of growth factor with chemoradiation, the administration of filgrastim with this regimen did not allow dose escalation. As in many other recent studies of hematopoietic growth factors given prophylactically with chemotherapy, the duration of neutropenia at the MTD was shortened and the need for dose reduction throughout treatment was reduced in patients receiving filgrastim at the MTD.     

Mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells in children using G-CSF after carboplatin containing myelosuppressive chemotherapy

PURPOSE: Peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) apheresis provides an alternative to autologous marrow harvest as a source of hematologic stem cells for transplantation in children with solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eight children with metastatic or recurrent solid tumors underwent 27 apheresis procedures. Recovery from myelosuppressive chemotherapy occurred without continuous daily growth factor support prior to mobilization. Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) at 16 microgs/kg/day was used to increase stem cells in the peripheral circulation. CD 34 positive cells, mononuclear cells (MNC), and CFU-GM were measured in the apheresis products. Prior chemotherapy was examined as a clinical factor that affected PBSC yield. RESULTS: A significant correlation was found between CD 34+/kg and CFU-GM/kg of the products (r = 0.758, P < 0.001). Patients receiving cumulative doses of carboplatin over 1,600 mg/m2 produced adequate MNC (1 x 10(8)/kg) but yielded significantly less CD 34+ cells or CFU-GM than those patients receiving less carboplatin. Prior doses of etoposide and ifosfamide did not effect PBSC yield. CONCLUSIONS: The mobilization technique was well tolerated, and the products obtained produced trilineage engraftment in the patients that underwent peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Peripheral blood stem cell apheresis in children can be optimized by selection of appropriate candidates and mobilization with G-CSF after an absence of hematopoietic growth factor support.