High doses of amphetamine augment, rather than disrupt, exocytotic dopamine release in the dorsal and ventral striatum of the anesthetized rat

High doses of amphetamine (AMPH) are thought to disrupt normal patterns of action potential-dependent dopaminergic neurotransmission by depleting vesicular stores of dopamine (DA) and inducing robust non-exocytotic DA release or efflux via dopamine transporter (DAT) reversal. However, these cardinal AMPH actions have been difficult to establish definitively in vivo. Here, we use fast-scan cyclic voltammetry (FSCV) in the urethane-anesthetized rat to evaluate the effects of 10 and 20 mg/kg AMPH on vesicular DA release and DAT function in dorsal and ventral striata. An equivalent high dose of cocaine (40 mg/kg) was also examined for comparison to psychostimulants acting preferentially by DAT inhibition. Parameters describing exocytotic DA release and neuronal DA uptake were determined from dynamic DA signals evoked by mild electrical stimulation previously established to be reinforcing. High-sensitivity FSCV with nanomolar detection was used to monitor changes in the background voltammetric signal as an index of DA efflux. Both doses of AMPH and cocaine markedly elevated evoked DA levels over the entire 2-h time course in the dorsal and ventral striatum. These increases were mediated by augmented vesicular DA release and diminished DA uptake typically acting concurrently. AMPH, but not cocaine, induced a slow, DA-like rise in some baseline recordings. However, this effect was highly variable in amplitude and duration, modest, and generally not present at all. These data thus describe a mechanistically similar activation of action potential-dependent dopaminergic neurotransmission by AMPH and cocaine in vivo. Moreover, DA efflux appears to be a unique, but secondary, AMPH action.     

Presynaptic regulation of dopaminergic neurotransmission

The development of electrochemical recordings with small carbon-fiber electrodes has significantly advanced the understanding of the regulation of catecholamine transmission in various brain areas. Recordings in vivo or in slice preparations monitor diffusion of catecholamine following stimulated synaptic release into the surrounding tissue. This synaptic 'overflow' is defined by the amount of release, by the activity of reuptake, and by the diffusion parameters in brain tissue. Such studies have elucidated the complex regulation of catecholamine release and uptake, and how psychostimulants and anti-psychotic drugs interfere with it. Moreover, recordings with carbon-fiber electrodes from cultured neurons have provided analysis of catecholamine release and its plasticity at the quantal level.     

Methamphetamine neurotoxicity decreases phasic, but not tonic, dopaminergic signaling in the rat striatum

Neurotoxic doses of methamphetamine (METH) are known to cause depletions in striatal dopamine (DA) tissue content. However, the effects of METH-induced insults on dopaminergic neurotransmission are not fully understood. Here, we employed fast-scan cyclic voltammetry at a carbon-fiber microelectrode in the anesthetized rat striatum to assess the effects of a neurotoxic regimen of METH on phasic and tonic modes of dopaminergic signaling and underlying mechanisms of DA release and uptake. Extracellular DA was electrically evoked by stimulation of the medial forebrain bundle mimicking tonic and phasic firing patterns for dopaminergic cells and was monitored simultaneously in both the dorsomedial and dorsolateral striatum. Kinetic analysis of evoked recordings determined parameters describing DA release and uptake. Striatal DA tissue content was quantified by high performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection. METH-pretreatment (four doses of 7.5 or 10.0 mg/kg s.c.) induced DA depletions of ～ 40% on average, which are reported in both striatal subregions. METH pre-treatment significantly decreased the amplitude of signals evoked by phasic, but not tonic, stimulation. Parameters for DA release and uptake were also similarly reduced by ～ 40%, consistent with effects on evoked phasic-like responses and DA tissue content. Taken together, these results suggest that METH-pretreatment selectively diminishes phasic, but not tonic, dopaminergic signaling in the dorsal striatum.     

Amphetamine augments vesicular dopamine release in the dorsal and ventral striatum through different mechanisms

Amphetamine has well‐established actions on pre‐synaptic dopamine signaling, such as inhibiting uptake and degradation, activating synthesis, depleting vesicular stores, and promoting dopamine‐transporter reversal and non‐exocytotic release. Recent in vivo studies have identified an additional mechanism: augmenting vesicular release. In this study, we investigated how amphetamine elicits this effect. Our hypothesis was that amphetamine enhances vesicular dopamine release in dorsal and ventral striata by differentially targeting dopamine synthesis and degradation. In urethane‐anesthetized rats, we employed voltammetry to monitor dopamine, electrical stimulation to deplete stores or assess vesicular release and uptake, and pharmacology to isolate degradation and synthesis. While amphetamine increased electrically evoked dopamine levels, inhibited uptake, and up‐regulated vesicular release in both striatal sub‐regions in controls, this psychostimulant elicited region‐specific effects on evoked levels and vesicular release but not uptake in drug treatments. Evoked levels better correlated with vesicular release compared with uptake, supporting enhanced vesicular release as an important amphetamine mechanism. Taken together, these results suggested that amphetamine enhances vesicular release in the dorsal striatum by activating dopamine synthesis and inhibiting dopamine degradation, but targeting an alternative mechanism in the ventral striatum. Region‐distinct activation of vesicular dopamine release highlights complex cellular actions of amphetamine and may have implications for its behavioral effects.     

Presynaptic regulation of dopaminergic transmission in the striatum

1. In vitro studies have indicated that several transmitters present in the striatum can regulate presynaptically the release of dopamine (DA) from nerve terminals of the nigrostriatal DA neurons. 2. The receptors involved in these local regulatory processes are located or not located on DA nerve terminals. 3. Recent in vivo investigations have demonstrated that the corticostriatal glutamatergic neurons facilitate presynaptically the release of DA and have allowed the analysis of the respective roles of presynaptic events and nerve activity in the control of DA transmission.     

Modulation of dopaminergic neurotransmission in rat striatum upon in vitro and in vivo diclofenac treatment

Diclofenac (DCF) is a widely used non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, which also act as a mitochondrial toxin. As it is known that selective mitochondrial complex I inhibition combined with mild oxidative stress causes striatal dopaminergic dysfunction, we tested whether DCF also compromise dopaminergic function in the striatum. [3H]Dopamine ([3H]DA) release was measured from rat striatal slices after in vitro (2 h, 10-25 micromol/L) or in vivo (3 mg/kg i.v. for 28 days) DCF treatment. In vitro treatment significantly decreased [3H]DA uptake and dopamine (DA) content of the slices. H2O2 (0.1 mmol/L)-evoked DA release was enhanced. Intracellular reactive oxygen species production was not significantly changed in the presence of DCF. After in vivo DCF treatment no apparent decrease in striatal DA content was observed and the uptake of [3H]DA into slices was increased. The intensity of tyrosine hydroxylase immunoreactivity in the striatum was highly variable, and both decrease and increase were observed in individual rats. The H2O2-evoked [3H]DA release was significantly decreased and the effluent contained a significant amount of [3H]octopamine, [3H]tyramine, and [3H]beta-phenylethylamine. The ATP content and adenylate energy charge were decreased. In conclusion, whereas in vitro DCF pre-treatment resembles the effect of the mitochondrial toxin rotenone, in vivo it rather counteracts than aggravates dopaminergic dysfunction.     

Controlled cortical impact injury affects dopaminergic transmission in the rat striatum

The therapeutic benefits of dopamine (DA) agonists after traumatic brain injury (TBI) imply a role for DA systems in mediating functional deficits post‐TBI. We investigated how experimental TBI affects striatal dopamine systems using fast scan cyclic voltammetry (FSCV), western blot, and d‐amphetamine‐induced rotational behavior. Adult male Sprague–Dawley rats were injured by a controlled cortical impact (CCI) delivered unilaterally to the parietal cortex, or were naïve controls. Amphetamine‐induced rotational behavior was assessed 10 days post‐CCI. Fourteen days post‐CCI, animals were anesthetized and underwent FSCV with bilateral striatal carbon fiber microelectrode placement and stimulating electrode placement in the medial forebrain bundle (MFB). Evoked DA overflow was assessed in the striatum as the MFB was electrically stimulated at 60 Hz for 10 s. In 23% of injured animals, but no naïve animals, rotation was observed with amphetamine administration. Compared with naïves, striatal evoked DA overflow was lower for injured animals in the striatum ipsilateral to injury (p < 0.05). Injured animals exhibited a decrease in V_max (52% of naïve, p < 0.05) for DA clearance in the hemisphere ipsilateral to injury compared with naïves. Dopamine transporter (DAT) expression was proportionally decreased in the striatum ipsilateral to injury compared with naïve animals (60% of naïve, p < 0.05), despite no injury‐related changes in vesicular monoamine transporter or D₂ receptor expression (DRD₂) in this region. Collectively, these data appear to confirm that the clinical efficacy of dopamine agonists in the treatment of TBI may be related to disruptions in the activity of subcortical dopamine systems.     

Theory for the impact of basal turnover on dopamine clearance kinetics in the rat striatum after medial forebrain bundle stimulation and pressure ejection

Although microdialysis measurements suggest that extracellular dopamine concentrations in the rat striatum are in the low nanomolar range, some recent voltammetry studies suggest that the concentration may be considerably higher, perhaps in the micromolar range. The presence of such high dopamine levels in the extracellular space has to be rationalized with the rapid, linear clearance of extracellular dopamine observed after electrical stimulation of the medial forebrain bundle. Kinetic analysis of dopamine clearance after evoked release suggests that the basal extracellular dopamine concentration is below the K(M) of dopamine uptake, which is near 0.2 microm. However, dopamine clearance after pressure ejection of dopamine into the rat striatum is slow and non-linear, which may alternatively be a sign that basal dopamine release is only slightly slower than the maximal velocity of dopamine uptake, Vmax. A high basal extracellular dopamine concentration would exist if basal dopamine release were only slightly slower than the Vmax of uptake. This report introduces a new kinetic analysis of dopamine uptake that sheds light on the possible source of the different clearance rates observed following evoked dopamine release and dopamine pressure ejection. Furthermore, the analysis rationalizes the rapid dopamine clearance after evoked release with the possibility that basal extracellular dopamine levels are above the K(M) of the transporter.     

Kinetic diversity of dopamine transmission in the dorsal striatum

Dopamine (DA), a highly significant neurotransmitter in the mammalian central nervous system, operates on multiple time scales to affect a diverse array of physiological functions. The significance of DA in human health is heightened by its role in a variety of pathologies. Voltammetric measurements of electrically evoked DA release have brought to light the existence of a patchwork of DA kinetic domains in the dorsal striatum (DS) of the rat. Thus, it becomes necessary to consider how these domains might be related to specific aspects of DA's functions. Responses evoked in the fast and slow domains are distinct in both amplitude and temporal profile. Herein, we report that responses evoked in fast domains can be further classified into four distinct types, types 1–4. The DS, therefore, exhibits a total of at least five distinct evoked responses (four fast types and one slow type). All five response types conform to kinetic models based entirely on first‐order rate expressions, which indicates that the heterogeneity among the response types arises from kinetic diversity within the DS terminal field. We report also that functionally distinct subregions of the DS express DA kinetic diversity in a selective manner. Thus, this study documents five response types, provides a thorough kinetic explanation for each of them, and confirms their differential association with functionally distinct subregions of this key DA terminal field.

     

In vivo monitoring of brain neurotransmitter release for the assessment of neuroendocrine interactions

Summary 1. The neurotransmitter mechanisms regulating neuroendocrine processes have been traditionally inferred from the effects of drugs purportedly acting through specific transmitter systems. The direct appraisal of changes in endogenous neuromediators had to rely initially on analyses of brain samples obtained post-morten.2. Currently, a more physiological assessment is available through the monitoring ot the extracellular levels of neurotransmitters and their metabolites in discrete brain areas of living animals. Two methodologies, namely in vivo voltammetry and microdialysis, are being increasingly used for this purpose. This article summarizes their principles, relative merits, and limitations and presents some relevant applications.3. Thus, microdialysis data show a differential response in the amphetamine-induced dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens in adult male and female rats castrated prepuberally. Given their high time-resolution, in vivo electrochemistry techniques seem especially suited for studying the fast, non-genomic effects of steroid hormones. This is illustrated by the voltammetric detection of a rapid release of dopamine in the corpus striatum induced by progesterone in males.4. These methodologies should be regarded as complementary tools for the assessment of the neurochemical correlates of neuroendocrine interactions.     

Evidence on extracellular dopamine level in rat striatum: implications for the validity of quantitative microdialysis

Microdialysis zero-net-flux (ZNF) method is commonly used to monitor drug-induced changes in neurotransmitter baseline and release/uptake processes. Recent studies in this field suggest that microdialysis ZNF method seriously underestimates the resting concentration of extracellular dopamine in the rat neostriatum because probe implantation preferentially damages nearby dopamine release sites and that dopamine uptake inhibition increases the relative recovery of dopamine by microdialysis. This study assessed the validity of these claims by examining current data on extracellular dopamine levels at rest and after drug application obtained by voltammetry, a technique thought to induce less tissue disruption than microdialysis. To obtain the extracellular baseline value for dopamine from the evoked overflow data, we modified the existing dopamine kinetic model to suit both the resting and stimulated circumstances. It was found that dopamine uptake inhibition did in fact decrease the microdialysis relative recovery of dopamine, implying that the average basal extracellular dopamine level is within the range of 7-20 nm in rat striatum. This study concludes that the microdialysis ZNF method indeed underestimates the extracellular dopamine concentration, although not by as much as had been thought. Chronic microdialysis damages both neurotransmitter release and uptake, but it does so in a somewhat relative and proportional way for both processes. Thus the validity of the microdialysis ZNF method is not seriously undermined.     

Role of vesicle pools in action potential pattern-dependent dopamine overflow in rat striatum in vivo

Action potential (AP) patterns and dopamine (DA) release are known to correlate with rewarding behaviors, but how codes of AP bursts translate into DA release in vivo remains elusive. Here, a given AP pattern was defined by four codes, termed total AP number, frequency, number of AP bursts, and interburst time [N, f, b, i].. The 'burst effect' was calculated by the ratio (γ) of DA overflow by multiple bursts to that of a single burst when total AP number was fixed. By stimulating the medial forebrain bundle using AP codes at either physiological (20 Hz) or supraphysiological (80 Hz) frequencies, we found that DA was released from two kinetically distinct vesicle pools, the fast-releasable pool (FRP) and prolonged-releasable pool (PRP), in striatal dopaminergic terminals in vivo. We examined the effects of vesicle pools on AP-pattern dependent DA overflow and found, with given 'burst codes' [b=8, i=0.5 s], a large total AP number [N = 768, f = 80 Hz] produced a facilitating burst-effect (γ[b8/b1] = 126 ± 3%), while a small total AP number [N=96, 80 Hz] triggered a depressing-burst-effect (γ[b8/b1] = 29 ± 4%). Furthermore, we found that the PRP (but not the FRP) predominantly contributed to the facilitating-burst-effect and the FRP played an important role in the depressing-burst effect. Thus, our results suggest that striatal DA release captures pre-synaptic AP pattern information through different releasable pools.     

An inverse correlation between the apparent rate of dopamine clearance and tonic autoinhibition in subdomains of the rat striatum: a possible role of transporter-mediated dopamine efflux

The dopaminergic terminal field in the rat striatum is compartmentalized into sub-domains that exhibit distinct dynamics of electrically evoked dopamine release. The fast striatal domains, where dopamine release is predominantly vesicular, exhibit conventional dopaminergic activity. However, vesicular dopamine release is tonically autoinhibited in the slow domains, which suggests that dopamine reaches the autoreceptors via a non-vesicular route. Hence, it appears that the domains use distinct mechanisms to regulate the basal dopamine concentration available to activate, or not, pre-synaptic autoinhibitory receptors. However, direct detection of local variations in tonic extracellular dopamine concentrations is not yet possible. So, the present study employed voltammetry to test the hypothesis that the apparent rate of dopamine clearance from the extracellular space should be domain-dependent. The apparent rate of dopamine clearance is equal to the difference in the rates of dopamine release and uptake that determine extracellular dopamine concentrations. This study confirms that the apparent rate of dopamine clearance is slower in the slow striatal domains where vesicular dopamine release is tonically autoinhibited. These findings support the view that the basal concentration in slow domains is maintained by a non-vesicular release process, possibly transporter-mediated efflux.     

Tonic autoinhibition contributes to the heterogeneity of evoked dopamine release in the rat striatum

Electrically evoked dopamine release as measured by voltammetry in the rat striatum is heterogeneous in both amplitude and temporal profile. Previous studies have attributed this heterogeneity to variations in the density of dopamine (DA) terminals at the recording site. We reach the alternate conclusion that the heterogeneity of evoked DA release derives from variations in the extent to which DA terminals are autoinhibited. We demonstrate that low-amplitude, slow evoked DA responses occur even though recording electrodes are close to DA terminals. Moreover, the D₂ agonist and antagonist, quinpirole and raclopride, respectively, affect the slow responses in a manner consistent with the known functions of pre-synaptic D₂ autoreceptors. Recording sites that exhibit autoinhibited responses are prevalent in the dorsal striatum. Autoinhibition preceded electrical stimulation, which is consistent with our prior reports that the striatum contains a tonic pool of extracellular DA at basal concentrations that exceed the affinity of D₂ receptors. We conclude that the striatum contains DA terminals operating on multiple time courses, determined at least in part by the local variation in autoinhibition. Thus, we provide direct, real-time observations of the functional consequence of tonic and phasic DAergic signaling in vivo .     

Pre-synaptic dopaminergic compensation after moderate nigrostriatal damage in non-human primates

Despite a dramatic loss of nigrostriatal dopaminergic neurons in Parkinson's disease, clinical symptoms only arise with 70–80% reduction of striatal dopamine. The mechanisms responsible for this functional compensation are currently under debate. Although initial studies showed an enhanced pre-synaptic dopaminergic function with nigrostriatal degeneration, more recent work suggests that functional compensation is not dopamine-mediated. To address this issue, we used cyclic voltammetry to directly measure endogenous dopamine release from striatal slices of control monkeys and animals with a moderate or severe MPTP-induced dopaminergic lesion. The moderately lesioned monkeys were asymptomatic, while the severely lesioned animals were parkinsonian. In monkeys with a moderate lesion, a 300% increase was obtained in endogenous striatal dopamine release. In contrast, in striatal slices from severely lesioned animals, a small % of evoked dopamine signals were similar in amplitude to control while the greater majority were undetectable. These findings suggest that pre-synaptic dopaminergic compensation develops in residual dopaminergic terminals with moderate lesioning, but that this response is lost with severe nigrostriatal damage. Such an interpretation is supported by the results of dopamine turnover studies. This enhanced pre-synaptic dopaminergic activity may be important in maintaining normal motor function during the initial stages of Parkinson's disease.     

Regionally and functionally distinct serotonin3 receptors control in vivo dopamine outflow in the rat nucleus accumbens

Central serotonin(3) (5-HT(3)) receptors control the mesoaccumbens dopamine (DA) pathway. This control is thought to be conditional and might involve regionally distinct subpopulations of 5-HT(3) receptors. Here, using in vivo microdialysis in rats, we assessed the relative contribution of nucleus accumbens (Nacc) 5-HT(3) receptors to the overall influence exerted by 5-HT(3) receptors on accumbal DA release induced by different drugs or treatments. In freely moving rats, pre-treatment with 5-HT(3) antagonists (0.1 mg/kg ondansetron and/or 0.03 mg/kg MDL 72222, s.c.) reduced DA efflux enhanced by morphine (1-10 mg/kg, s.c.) and haloperidol (0.01 mg/kg, s.c.), but not amphetamine (1-2.5 mg/kg, i.p.) or cocaine (10-20 mg/kg, i.p.), the latter two drugs do not trigger depolarization-stimulated DA exocytosis. Intra-Nacc administration of ondansetron (1 microm) in freely moving rats reduced the DA effects elicited by 10 mg/kg morphine, but not 1 mg/kg morphine or haloperidol. The 5-HT(1A) agonist 8-OH-DPAT (0.1 mg/kg, s.c.), known to decrease central 5-HT tone, reduced 10 but not 1 mg/kg morphine-stimulated DA outflow in freely moving rats. In halothane-anaesthetized rats, intra-Nacc ondansetron (1 microm) application reduced dorsal raphe nucleus electrical stimulation (20Hz)-induced DA outflow. Our results show that regionally distinct populations of 5-HT(3) receptors control the depolarization-dependent exocytosis of DA and suggest that the involvement of Nacc 5-HT(3) receptors occurs only when central DA and 5-HT tones are concomitantly increased.