Outcomes of Pediatric Kidney Transplantation in Recipients of a Previous Non‐Renal Solid Organ Transplant

Children who receive a non‐renal solid organ transplant may develop secondary renal failure requiring kidney transplantation. We investigated outcomes of 165 pediatric kidney transplant recipients who previously received a heart, lung, or liver transplant using data from 1988 to 2012 reported to the United Network for Organ Sharing. Patient and allograft survival were compared with 330 matched primary kidney transplant (PKT) recipients. Kidney transplantation after solid organ transplant (KASOT) recipients experienced similar allograft survival: 5‐ and 10‐year graft survival was 78% and 60% in KASOT recipients, compared to 80% and 61% in PKT recipients (p = 0.69). However, KASOT recipients demonstrated worse 10‐year patient survival (75% KASOT vs. 97% PKT, p < 0.001). Competing risks analysis indicated that KASOT recipients more often experienced graft loss due to patient death (p < 0.001), whereas allograft failure per se was more common in PKT recipients (p = 0.01). To study more recent outcomes, kidney transplants performed from 2006 to 2012 were separately investigated. Since 2006, KASOT and PKT recipients had similar 5‐year graft survival (82% KASOT vs. 83% PKT, p = 0.48), although 5‐year patient survival of KASOT recipients remained inferior (90% KASOT vs. 98% PKT, p < 0.001). We conclude that despite decreased patient survival, kidney allograft outcomes in pediatric KASOT recipients are comparable to those of PKT recipients.     

Pancreas After Islet Transplantation: A First Report of the International Pancreas Transplant Registry

Pancreas after islet (PAI) transplantation is a treatment option for patients seeking insulin independence through a whole‐organ transplant after a failed cellular transplant. This report from the International Pancreas Transplant Registry (IPTR) and the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) studied PAI transplant outcomes over a 10‐year time period. Forty recipients of a failed alloislet transplant subsequently underwent pancreas transplant alone (50%), pancreas after previous kidney transplant (22.5%), or simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) transplant (27.5%). Graft and patient survival rates were not statistically significantly different compared with matched primary pancreas transplants. Regardless of the recipient category, overall 1‐ and 5‐year PAI patient survival rates for all 40 cases were 97% and 83%, respectively; graft survival rates were 84% and 65%, respectively. A failed previous islet transplant had no negative impact on kidney graft survival in the SPK category: It was the same as for primary SPK transplants. According to this IPTR/UNOS analysis, a PAI transplant is a safe procedure with low recipient mortality, high graft‐function rates in both the short and long term and excellent kidney graft outcomes. Patients with a failed islet transplant should know about this alternative in their quest for insulin independence through transplantation.     

Standard criteria donor pancreas donation status is associated with improved kidney transplant outcomes

Abstract: Background: Organ donor characteristics can be used to predict outcomes in kidney transplantation. We hypothesized that pancreas donation status could reflect organ quality and be predictive of kidney graft outcomes following Standard Criteria Donor (SCD) kidney transplantation. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of deceased donor kidney alone (DD KA) transplants reported to SRTR from 1992 to 2005. Group 1 = kidney alone recipients from pancreas donors (KA, P+) and Group 2 = kidney alone recipients from non‐pancreas donors (KA, P?). We compared patient and graft survival between groups at 10‐yr post‐transplant. Results: Group 1 (KA, P+) comprised 19 633 (20%) recipients and Group 2 (KA, P?) comprised 78 737 (80%) recipients. Ten‐yr graft survival for Group 1 vs. Group 2 was 42.6% and 36.9% (p < 0.0001), respectively. Pancreas donation status (non‐pancreas donor) was associated with a hazard ratio for graft loss of 1.23 on univariate analysis (p < 0.0001), and KA, P‐remained an independent risk factor for graft failure at 10 yr, HR 1.09 (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: Donor pancreas donation status is an independent predictor of improved outcomes of SCD kidney recipients. Further study of the pancreas organ donor pre‐procurement is warranted to optimize not only pancreas utilization but also kidney graft outcomes.     

Local Expansion of Donation After Circulatory Death Kidney Transplant Activity Improves Waitlisted Outcomes and Addresses Inequities of Access to Transplantation

In the United Kingdom, donation after circulatory death (DCD) kidney transplant activity has increased rapidly, but marked regional variation persists. We report how increased DCD kidney transplant activity influenced waitlisted outcomes for a single center. Between 2002–2003 and 2011–2012, 430 (54%) DCD and 361 (46%) donation after brain death (DBD) kidney‐only transplants were performed at the Cambridge Transplant Centre, with a higher proportion of DCD donors fulfilling expanded criteria status (41% DCD vs. 32% DBD; p = 0.01). Compared with U.K. outcomes, for which the proportion of DCD:DBD kidney transplants performed is lower (25%; p < 0.0001), listed patients at our center waited less time for transplantation (645 vs. 1045 days; p < 0.0001), and our center had higher transplantation rates and lower numbers of waiting list deaths. This was most apparent for older patients (aged >65 years; waiting time 730 vs. 1357 days nationally; p < 0.001), who received predominantly DCD kidneys from older donors (mean donor age 64 years), whereas younger recipients received equal proportions of living donor, DBD and DCD kidney transplants. Death‐censored kidney graft survival was nevertheless comparable for younger and older recipients, although transplantation conferred a survival benefit from listing for only younger recipients. Local expansion in DCD kidney transplant activity improves survival outcomes for younger patients and addresses inequity of access to transplantation for older recipients.     

Predictors and outcomes of delayed graft function after living‐donor kidney transplantation

Delayed graft function (DGF) following deceased donor kidney transplantation is associated with inferior outcomes. Delayed graft function following living‐donor kidney transplantation is less common, but its impact on graft survival unknown. We therefore sought to determine risk factors for DGF following living‐donor kidney transplantation and DGF's effect on living‐donor kidney graft survival. We analyzed living‐donor kidney transplants performed between 2000 and 2014 in the UNOS dataset. A total of 64 024 living‐donor kidney transplant recipients were identified, 3.6% developed DGF. Cold ischemic time, human leukocyte antigen mismatch, donor age, panel reactive antibody, recipient diabetes, donor and recipient body mass index, recipient race and gender, right nephrectomy, open nephrectomy, dialysis status, ABO incompatibility, and previous transplants were independent predictors of DGF in living‐donor kidney transplants. Five‐year graft survival among living‐donor kidney transplant recipients with DGF was significantly lower compared with graft survival in those without DGF (65% and 85%, respectively, P < 0.001). DGF more than doubled the risk of subsequent graft failure (hazard ratio = 2.3, 95% confidence interval: 2.1–2.6; P < 0.001). DGF after living‐donor kidney transplantation is associated with inferior allograft outcomes. Minimizing modifiable risk factors may improve outcomes in living‐donor kidney transplantation.     

Should heart,lung, and liver transplant recipients receive immunosuppression induction for kidney transplantation?

Ranney DN, Englesbe MJ, Muhammad W, Al‐Holou SN, Park JM, Pelletier SJ, Punch JD, Lynch RJ. Should heart, lung, and liver transplant recipients receive immunosuppression induction for kidney transplantation?
Clin Transplant 2010: 24: 67–72. © 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: As the outcomes of heart, liver, and lung transplantation continue to improve, more patients will present for subsequent renal transplantation. It remains unclear whether these patients benefit from induction immunosuppression. We retrospectively reviewed induction on solid organ graft recipients who underwent renal transplant at our center from January 1, 1995 to March 30, 2007. Induction and the non‐induction groups were compared by univariate and Kaplan–Meier analyses. There were 21 patients in each group, with mean follow‐up of 4.5–6.0 years. Forty‐seven percent of patients receiving induction had a severe post‐operative infection, compared with 28.6% in the non‐induction group (p = NS). The one yr rejection rate in the induction group was 9.5% compared with 14.3% for non‐induction (p = NS). One‐yr graft survival was 81.0% and 95.2% in the induction and non‐induction group (p = NS). In summary, there is a trend toward lower patient and graft survival among patients undergoing induction. These trends could relate to selection bias in the decision to prescribe induction immunosuppression, but further study is needed to better define the risks and benefits of antibody‐induction regimens in this population.     

Outcomes following Kidney transplantation in IgA nephropathy: a UNOS/OPTN analysis

This study updates assessment of post‐transplant outcomes in IgAN patients in the modern era of immunosuppression. Using UNOS/OPTN data, patients ≥18 yr of age with first kidney transplant (1/1/1999 to 12/31/2008) were analyzed. Multivariable Cox regression models and propensity score‐based matching techniques were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for death‐censored allograft survival (DCGS) and patient survival in IgAN compared to non‐IgAN. Results of multivariable regression were stratified by donor type (living vs. deceased). A total of 107, 747 recipients were included (4589 with IgAN and 103 158 with non‐IgAN). Adjusted HR for DCGS showed no significant difference between IgAN and non‐IgAN. IgAN had higher patient survival compared to non‐IgAN (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.47–0.62, p < 0.0001 for deceased donors; HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.33–0.54, p < 0.0001 for living donors). Propensity score‐matched analysis was similar, with no significant difference in DCGS between matched groups and higher patient survival in IgAN patients compared to non‐IgAN group (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.47, 0.63; p‐value <0.0001). IgAN patients with first kidney transplant have superior patient survival and similar graft survival compared to non‐IgAN recipients. Results can be used in prognostication and informed decision‐making about kidney transplantation in patients with IgAN.     

Retroactive application of the new kidney allocation system to renal transplants performed in the ECD/SCD era

The kidney allocation system (KAS) aims to improve deceased donor kidney transplant outcomes by matching of donor allografts and kidney recipients using the kidney donor risk index (KDRI) and recipient estimated post‐transplant survival (EPTS) indices. In this single‐center study, KAS was retroactively applied to 573 adult deceased donor kidney transplants (2004–2012) performed in the extended criteria/standard criteria donor (ECD/SCD) era. Donor KDRI and recipient EPTS were calculated, and transplants were analyzed to identify KAS fits. These were defined as allocation of top 20% allografts to top 20% recipients and bottom 80% allografts to bottom 80% recipients. On retroactive calculation, 70.2% of all transplants fit the KAS. Transplants that fit the KAS had inferior 1‐ and 5‐yr patient survival (95.5% vs. 98.8%, p = 0.048, and 83.4% vs. 91.7%, p = 0.018) and similar 1‐ and 5‐yr graft survival compared to transplants that did not fit the KAS (91.3% vs. 94.1%, p = 0.276, and 72.7% vs. 73.9%, p = 0.561). While EPTS correlated with recipient survival (HR = 2.96, p < 0.001), KDRI correlated with both recipient (HR = 3.56, p < 0.001) and graft survival (HR = 3.23, p < 0.001). Overall, retroactive application of the KAS to transplants performed in the ECD/SCD era did not identify superior patient survival for kidneys allocated in accordance with the KAS.     

Serum phosphate and calcium concentrations are associated with reduced patient survival following kidney transplantation

Moore J, Tomson CRV, Tessa Savage M, Borrows R, Ferro CJ. Serum phosphate and calcium concentrations are associated with reduced patient survival following kidney transplantation.
Clin Transplant 2011: 25: 406–416. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: The impact of disordered mineral and bone metabolism following kidney transplantation is not well defined. We studied the association of serum phosphate and calcium concentrations, and surrogate measures of arterial stiffness (augmentation index: AIx and Timing of the reflected wave: Tr), with long‐term kidney transplant recipient and allograft survival. Prevalent adult renal transplant patients (n = 270) were prospectively studied over a median 88‐month follow‐up. Detailed demographic, clinical and laboratory data, in addition to both peripheral and central non‐invasive blood pressure measurements, were recorded. Higher serum phosphate and calcium levels were associated with increased all‐cause mortality (HR: 1.21; 95% CI 1.09,1.35, p < 0.001 and HR: 1.22; 95% CI 1.01,1.48; p < 0.04, respectively; adjusted Cox model) and death‐uncensored graft loss (p < 0.001 and p = 0.03, respectively). In addition, serum calcium and phosphate were associated with death‐censored graft loss on univariable analysis (p < 0.001 and p = 0.02, respectively), but did not retain significance on multivariable analysis. AIx and Tr were not associated with mortality or graft loss on multivariable analysis. This is the first report to demonstrate that both higher serum phosphate and calcium levels are associated with increased mortality in kidney transplant recipients. It highlights the need for randomized trials assessing current interventions available for improving disordered mineral–bone metabolism post transplantation.     

Renal Transplantation in Patients With AA Amyloidosis Nephropathy: Results From a French Multicenter Study

Although end‐stage renal disease related to AA amyloidosis nephropathy is well characterized, there are limited data concerning patient and graft outcome after renal transplantation. We performed a multicentric retrospective survey to assess the graft and patient survival in 59 renal recipients with AA amyloidosis. The recurrence rate of AA amyloidosis nephropathy was estimated at 14%. The overall, 5‐ and 10‐year patient survival was significantly lower for the AA amyloidosis patients than for a control group of 177 renal transplant recipients (p = 0.0001, 0.028 and 0.013, respectively). In contrast, we did not observe any statistical differences in the 5‐ and 10‐ year graft survival censored for death between two groups. AA amyloidosis‐transplanted patients exhibited a high proportion of infectious complications after transplantation (73.2%). Causes of death included both acute cardiovascular events and fatal septic complications. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the recurrence of AA amyloidosis on the graft (adjusted OR = 14.4, p = 0.01) and older recipient age (adjusted OR for a 1‐year increase = 1.06, p = 0.03) were significantly associated with risk of death. Finally, patients with AA amyloidosis nephropathy are eligible for renal transplantation but require careful management of both cardiovascular and infectious complications to reduce the high risk of mortality.     

Living Donor Age and Kidney Transplant Outcomes

We assessed the relationship between living donor (LD) age and kidney survival in 1063 adults transplanted between 1980 and 2007. Increasing LD age was associated with lower kidney function (GFR) before and after transplantation and loss of GFR beyond 1 year. Increasing LD age was also associated with low‐moderate proteinuria posttransplant (151–1500 mg/day, p < 0.0001). By univariate analysis, reduced graft survival related to lower GFR at 1 year [HR = 0.925 (0.906–0.944), p < 0.0001], proteinuria [HR = 1.481 (1.333–1.646), p < 0.0001] and increasing LD age [HR = 1.271 (1.219–1.326), p = 0.001]. The impact of LD age on graft survival was noted particularly >4 years posttransplant and was modified by recipient age. Thus, compared to a kidney graft that was within 5 years of the recipient age, younger kidneys had a survival advantage [HR = 0.600 (0.380–0.949), p = 0.029] while older kidneys had a survival disadvantage [HR = 2.217 (1.507–3.261), p < 0.0001]. However, this effect was seen only in recipients <50 years old. By multivariate analysis, the relationship between LD age and graft survival was independent of GFR but related to proteinuria. In conclusion, LD age is an important determinant of long‐term graft survival, particularly in younger recipients. Older kidneys with reduced survival are identifiable by the development of proteinuria posttransplant.     

Patient survival after renal transplantation: II. The impact of smoking

Renal transplant recipients have significantly higher mortality than individuals without kidney disease and the excess mortality is mainly due to cardiovascular causes. In this study, we sought to determine the impact of smoking, a major cardiovascular risk factor, on patient and renal graft survival. The study population included all adult recipients of first cadaveric kidney transplants done in our institution from 1984 to 1991. By selection, all patients were alive and had a functioning graft for at least 1 yr after transplantation. Smoking history was gathered prior to transplantation. The follow-up period was 84.3 + 41 months and during this time 28%, of the patients died and 21%, lost their graft. By univariate and multivariate analysis, patient survival, censored at the time of graft loss, correlated with these pre-transplant variables: age (p < 0.0001); diabetes (p = 0.0002); history of cigarette smoking (p = 0.004); time on dialysis prior to the transplant (p = 0.0005); and cardiomegaly by chest X-ray (p = 0.0005). Post-transplant variables did not correlate with patient mortality. By Cox regression, patient survival time was significantly shorter in diabetics (p < 0.0001), smokers (p = 0.0005), and recipients older than 40 yr. However, there were no significant differences between the survival of smokers, non-diabetics, diabetics, and older recipients. Patient death was the most common cause of renal transplant failure in smokers, in patients older than 40 yr, and in diabetics, but these patient characteristics did not correlate with graft survival. The prevalence of different causes of death was not significantly different between smokers and non-smokers. In conclusion, a history of cigarette smoking correlates with decreased patient survival after transplantation, and the magnitude of the negative impact of smoking in renal transplant recipients is quantitatively similar to that of diabetes.     

Chronic allograft nephropathy uniformly affects recipients of cadaveric,nonidentical living-related,and living-unrelated grafts

BACKGROUND: Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) remains a major barrier to long-term allograft survival. The authors retrospectively compared the development of CAN in recipients of cadaveric (CAD), living-related donor (LRD), and living-unrelated donor (LURD) transplants at their center. METHODS: The authors retrospectively examined the impact of various factors on the incidence of CAN using univariate and multivariate proportional hazards analysis in a single-center kidney transplant population. RESULTS: Between 1 January 1990 and 31 May 2000, 2,140 kidney-alone transplants were performed at the authors' center. The overall 5-year incidence of biopsy-proven CAN was 12.2% (n=203). Risk factors for CAN included the number of transplants (P=0.0001), acute rejection (P=0.0001), panel reactive antibody (P=0.0001), discharge creatinine (P=0.0001), 1-year creatinine (P=0.0015), delayed graft function (P=0.007), total human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-B and -DR mismatches (P=0.0005), recipient age (P=0.003), black donor race (P=0.001), black recipient race (0.0457), donor age (P=0.0053), cold storage time (P=0.019), and cytomegalovirus infections (P=0.002). Interestingly, although the LRD HLA-identical recipients had a significantly lower incidence of CAN (P=0.0015), the incidence of CAN in CAD and HLA-nonidentical LRD recipients did not differ. Graft survival was significantly worse in CAD recipients compared with all other groups (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate the importance of immunologic and nonimmunologic factors on the development of CAN. The disparities in overall graft survival, despite the similarities in CAN rates, suggests that other factors, in addition to CAN, influence the increase in graft loss in CAD transplant recipients.     

Diabetes Mellitus after Kidney Transplantation in the United States

New onset diabetes is a major complication after kidney transplantation. However, the incidence, risk factors and clinical relevance of post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) vary among reports from single-center observational studies and clinical trials. Using data from the United Renal Data System we identified 11 659 Medicare beneficiaries who received their first kidney transplant in 1996-2000. The cumulative incidence of PTDM was 9.1% (95% confidence interval = 8.6-9.7%), 16.0% (15.3-16.7%), and 24.0% (23.1-24.9%) at 3, 12, and 36 months post-transplant, respectively. Using Cox's proportional hazards analysis, risk factors for PTDM included age, African American race (relative risk = 1.68, range: 1.52-1.85, p < 0.0001), Hispanic ethnicity (1.35, range: 1.19-1.54, p < 0.0001), male donor (1.12, range: 1.03-1.21, p = 0.0090), increasing HLA mismatches, hepatitis C infection (1.33, range: 1.15-1.55, p < 0.0001), body mass index >or=30 kg/m2 (1.73, range: 1.57-1.90, p < 0.0001), and the use of tacrolimus as the initial maintenance immunosuppressive medication (1.53, range: 1.29-1.81, p < 0.0001). Factors that reduced the risk for PTDM included the use of mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, younger recipient age, glomerulonephritis as a cause of kidney failure, and a college education. As a time-dependent covariate in Cox analyses that also included multiple other risk factors, PTDM was associated with increased graft failure (1.63, 1.46-1.84, p < 0.0001), death-censored graft failure (1.46, 1.25-1.70, p < 0.0001), and mortality (1.87, 1.60-2.18, p < 0.0001). We conclude that high incidences of PTDM are associated with the type of initial maintenance immunosuppression, race, ethnicity, obesity and hepatitis C infection. It is a strong, independent predictor of graft failure and mortality. Efforts should be made to minimize the risk of this important complication.     

Multivariate analysis of factors affecting patient and graft survival after renal transplant

AIM: To evaluate factors affecting patient and kidney survival after renal transplant. PATIENT AND METHODS: Among 361 patients undergoing renal transplant: 52% (n = 189) were simultaneous with pancreas transplant (SPKT group) and 48% (n = 172), a kidney transplant alone (KT group). Out of 361 patients, 75% (n = 270) were diabetics. The patients were 220 (61%) men and 141 (39%) women of mean age 41 +/- 9 years. The mean time of dialysis was 42 +/- 21 months (range 0 to 126), and the mean duration of diabetes 24 +/- 7 years (range 5 to 51). A Cox regression analysis was done. RESULTS: The multivariate analysis revealed that in the final model diabetes and donor age were significant predictors of kidney graft survival; moreover, diabetes and recipient age were predictors of patient survival. Overall patient survival was significantly greater among nondiabetic patients (P = .002) or in diabetic patients who received SPKT, when compared with diabetics in whom only the kidney was transplanted (P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes and donor age were independent prognostic factors affecting kidney graft survival after renal transplant, and recipient age and diabetes were prognostic factors affecting patient survival. Combined pancreas and kidney transplantation should be offered to patients with end-stage diabetic nephropathy.     

Predisposing Factors of Diminished Survival in Simultaneous Liver/Kidney Transplantation

Since the adoption of the Model for End‐Stage Liver Disease, simultaneous liver/kidney transplants (SLKT) have substantially increased. Recently, unfavorable outcomes have been reported yet contributing factors remain unclear. We retrospectively reviewed 74 consecutive adult SLKT performed at our center from 2000 to 2010 and compared with kidney transplant alone (KTA, N = 544). In SLKT, patient and death‐censored kidney graft survival rates were 64 ± 6% and 81 ± 5% at 5 years, respectively (median follow‐up, 47 months). Multivariable analyses revealed three independent risk factors affecting patient survival: hepatitis C virus positive (HCV+, hazard ratio [HR] 2.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1–7.9), panel reactive antibody (PRA) > 20% (HR 2.8, 95% CI 1.1–7.2) and female donor gender (HR 2.9, 95% CI 1.1–7.9). For death‐censored kidney graft survival, delayed graft function was the strongest negative predictor (HR 8.3, 95% CI 2.5–27.9), followed by HCV+ and PRA > 20%. The adjusted risk of death‐censored kidney graft loss in HCV+ SLKT patients was 5.8 (95% CI 1.6–21.6) compared with HCV+ KTA (p = 0.008). Recurrent HCV within 1 year after SLKT correlated with early kidney graft failure (p = 0.004). Careful donor/recipient selection and innovative approaches for HCV+ SLKT patients are critical to further improve long‐term outcomes.     

Economic Impacts of ABO‐Incompatible Live Donor Kidney Transplantation: A National Study of Medicare‐Insured Recipients

The infrequent use of ABO‐incompatible (ABOi) kidney transplantation in the United States may reflect concern about the costs of necessary preconditioning and posttransplant care. Medicare data for 26 500 live donor kidney transplant recipients (2000 to March 2011), including 271 ABOi and 62 A2‐incompatible (A2i) recipients, were analyzed to assess the impact of pretransplant, transplant episode and 3‐year posttransplant costs. The marginal costs of ABOi and A2i versus ABO‐compatible (ABOc) transplants were quantified by multivariate linear regression including adjustment for recipient, donor and transplant factors. Compared with ABOc transplantation, patient survival (93.2% vs. 88.15%, p = 0.0009) and death‐censored graft survival (85.4% vs. 76.1%, p < 0.05) at 3 years were lower after ABOi transplant. The average overall cost of the transplant episode was significantly higher for ABOi ($65 080) compared with A2i ($36 752) and ABOc ($32 039) transplantation (p < 0.001), excluding organ acquisition. ABOi transplant was associated with high adjusted posttransplant spending (marginal costs compared to ABOc ‐ year 1: $25 044; year 2: $10 496; year 3: $7307; p < 0.01). ABOi transplantation provides a clinically effective method to expand access to transplantation. Although more expensive, the modest increases in total spending are easily justified by avoiding long‐term dialysis and its associated morbidity and cost.     

Influence of pretransplant midodrine use on outcomes after kidney transplantation

Evaluation of potential kidney transplant recipients is important to identify and treat conditions that may influence graft or patient survival after transplantation. We performed a single‐center, observational cohort study to determine whether pretransplant midodrine use influences outcomes after kidney transplantation. We analyzed graft and patient outcomes for adult patients who underwent a kidney‐only transplantation at Barnes‐Jewish Hospital from January 1999 to December 2015. We quantified adjusted associations of pretransplant midodrine use with post‐transplant complications by multivariable Cox regression. Among the 2621 kidney transplant recipients analyzed, 37 (1.4%) were taking midodrine immediately prior to transplantation. Midodrine users were more commonly older (56.5 vs 50.4 years) and obese (67.6% vs 33.6%). Midodrine users were also more likely to be on hemodialysis (86.5% vs 59.2%), to have a longer duration of dialysis dependence (646 months vs 577 months), and to have higher levels of sensitization (peak panel reactive antibody >20%, 32.4% vs 15.8%) compared to nonusers. Pretransplant midodrine users had significantly higher rates of delayed graft function (DGF) (32.4% vs 6.7%, P < 0.001). No difference in the incidence of DGF was observed based on the midodrine dosing regimen. After multivariable adjustment for recipient and donor characteristics, pretransplant midodrine use was independently associated with graft failure at 1 year (adjusted hazard ratio, 5.11; 95% confidence interval, 2.09‐12.49).     

Early Graft Loss After Kidney Transplantation: Risk Factors and Consequences

Early graft loss (EGL) after kidney transplantation is a catastrophic outcome that is assumed to be more likely after the use of kidneys from suboptimal donors. We therefore examined its incidence, risk factors and consequences in our center in relation to different donor types. Of 801 recipients who received a kidney‐only transplant from deceased donors, 50 (6.2%) suffered EGL within 30 days of transplantation. Significant risks factors for EGL were donation after circulatory death (DCD) (odds ratio [OR] 2.88; p = 0.006), expanded criteria donor (ECD) transplantation (OR 4.22; p = 0.010), donor age (OR 1.03; p = 0.044) and recipient past history of thrombosis (OR 4.91; p = 0.001). Recipients with EGL had 12.28 times increased risk of death within the first year, but long‐term survival was worse for patients remaining on the waiting list. In comparison with patients on the waiting list but not transplanted, and with all patients on the waiting list, the risk of death after EGL decreased to baseline 4 and 23 months after transplantation, respectively. Our findings suggest that DCD and ECD transplantation are significant risk factors for EGL, which is a major risk factor for recipient death. However, long‐term mortality is even greater for those remaining on the waiting list.     

Daclizumab Versus Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin in High‐Risk Renal Transplants: Five‐Year Follow‐up of a Randomized Study

We previously reported a randomized controlled trial in which 227 de novo deceased‐donor kidney transplant recipients were randomized to rabbit antithymocyte (rATG, Thymoglobulin) or daclizumab if they were considered to be at high immunological risk, defined as high panel reactive antibodies (PRA), loss of a first kidney graft through rejection within 2 years of transplantation, or third or fourth transplantation. Patients treated with rATG had lower incidences of biopsy‐proven acute rejection (BPAR) and steroid‐resistant rejection at 1 year. Patients were followed to 5 years posttransplant in an observational study; findings are described here. Treatment with rATG was associated with a lower rate of BPAR at 5 years (14.2% vs. 26.0% with daclizumab; p = 0.035). Only one rATG‐treated patient (0.9%) and one daclizumab‐treated patient (1.0%) developed BPAR after 1 year. Five‐year graft and patient survival rates, and renal function, were similar between the two groups. Overall graft survival at 5 years was significantly higher in patients without BPAR (81.0% vs. 54.8%; p < 0.001). In conclusion, rATG is superior to daclizumab for the prevention of BPAR among high‐immunological‐risk renal transplant recipients. Overall graft survival at 5 years was approximately 70% with either induction therapy, which compares favorably to low‐risk cohorts.