Hemispheric specialization and ear advantages in processing speech.

Reviews research on the hemispheric asymmetry model of relative ear advantages in the processing of auditory stimuli. Physiological studies of activation of the hemispheres in humans support left-hemisphere speech-processing specialization and contralateral sound field dominance. Electrophysiological studies in animals, effects of commissurotomy, hemispherectomy, and unilateral temporal lobe lesions on dichotic performance in humans, as well as stimulus dominance effects in intact Ss indicate that the assumption of ipsilateral sensory pathway suppression during competitive stimulation is unwarranted. Dichotic presentation is not necessary to produce a right-ear advantage (REA), and selective attention to one or the other ear frequently tends to alter the magnitude of the REA. A modified structural model that incorporates the effects of directed attention is proposed. (3? p ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Dichotic listening in patients with splenial and nonsplenial callosal lesions.

The authors found splenial lesions to be associated with left ear suppression in dichotic listening of consonant-vowel syllables. This was found in both a rapid presentation dichotic monitoring task and a standard dichotic listening task, ruling out attentional limitations in the processing of high stimulus loads as a confounding factor. Moreover, directed attention to the left ear did not improve left ear target detection in the patients, independent of callosal lesion location. The authors' data may indicate that auditory callosal fibers pass through the splenium more posterior than previously thought. However, further studies should investigate whether callosal fibers between primary and secondary auditory cortices, or between higher level multimodal cortices, are vital for the detection of left ear targets in dichotic listening. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Auditory processing speed and signal detection in schizophrenia.

Examined 2 differing explanations of schizophrenic processing deficit, J. Chapman and A. McGhie's (1962) and A. J. Yates's (see PA, Vol 41:10769). 32 18-46 yr old schizophrenics, classified on the acute-chronic and paranoid-nonparanoid dimensions, and 8 17-45 yr old neurotics were tested on 2 dichotic listening tasks. One task gave reaction time measures of processing speed at 3 rates of stimulus presentation; the other assessed stimulus detection and channel selectivity using theory of signal detection methods. Results support Yates and indicate that schizophrenics can attend successfully to 1 of 2 competing channels. Neither reduced sensory sensitivity nor response bias appeared to affect the performance of any group of Ss. Slowness of processing was a deficit characteristic of chronic, particularly nonparanoid, schizophrenics, although the factors responsible for this slowness remain a matter for empirical investigation. (25 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

A cardiac measure of cerebral asymmetries in infant auditory perception.

Examined the utility of cardiac habituation response recovery as a method for assessing infant cerebral asymmetries in auditory perception in a dichotic listening test. In a within-Ss design 12 3-mo-old infants were given a series of 4 10-trial tests during which their cardiac responses were habituated to a pair of dichotic speech syllables or music notes. The 10th trial in each test was a test trial on which one ear received its habituation stimulus while the other ear received a novel stimulus of the same type as the habituation pair (speech or music). Both stimulus type and ear receiving the novel stimulus were counterbalanced across tests. Overall, Ss' cardiac responses habituated during the tests and showed differential recovery to the novel stimuli. Specifically, greater response recovery occurred when a novel speech syllable was presented to the right, than to the left ear. Conversely, greater response recovery was found when a novel music note was presented to the left than to the right ear. Results indicate that young infants show a pattern of auditory perceptual asymmetries much like that found in older children and adults. Findings are consistent with the theory that in man the left hemisphere is superior at processing speech and the right hemisphere superior with nonspeech. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

A comparison of aphasic and non-brain-injured adults on a dichotic CV-syllable listening task

A dichotic CV-syllable listening task was administered to a group of eleven non-brain-injured adults and to a group of eleven adult aphasics. The results of this study may be summarized as follows: 1)The group of non-brain-injured adults showed a slight right ear advantage for dichotically presented CV-syllables. 2)In comparison with the control group the asphasic group showed a bilateral deficit in response to the dichotic CV-syllables, superimposed on a non-significant right ear advantage. 3) The asphasic group demonstrated a great deal of intersubject variability on the dichotic task with six aphasics showing a right ear preference for the stimuli. The non-brain-injured subjects performed more homogeneously on the task. 4) The two subgroups of aphasics, a right ear advantage group and a left ear advantage group, performed significantly different on the dichotic listening task. 5) Single correct data analysis proved valuable by deleting accuracy of report for an examination of trials in which there was true competition for the single left hemispheric speech processor. These results were analyzed in terms of a functional model of auditory processing. In view of this model, the bilateral deficit in dichotic performance of the asphasic group was accounted for by the presence of a lesion within the dominant left hemisphere, where the speech signals from both ears converge for final processing. The right ear advantage shown by one asphasic subgroup was explained by a lesion interfering with the corpus callosal pathways from the left hemisphere; the left ear advantage observed within the other subgroup was explained by a lesion in the area of the auditory processor of the left hemisphere.     

Endogenous and exogenous control of attention in dichotic listening.

Dichotic listening to verbal stimuli results in a right ear advantage (REA), indicating a left hemisphere processing superiority. The magnitude of the REA can be modulated by instructions to direct attention to the left or right ear stimulus. A previous study from our laboratory showed that presenting a prime syllable before the presentation of the dichotic syllables increases reports of the nonprimed syllable, apparently a negative priming effect that inhibits attention to the distracting prime representation. The present study combined attention instruction and priming, making up a 3 × 3 factorial design. The prime stimulus was a single consonant-vowel syllable presented binaurally just before onset of the dichotic consonant-vowel syllables. Results showed that both instructions and priming manipulations had an effect on which dichotic stimulus was selected. There was also a significant interaction between attention instruction and priming manipulation, indicating that the mechanism for instructed attention and the mechanism for negative priming work on the same level of processing. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Effect of directed attention on cerebral asymmetries in normal and learning-disabled children.

Using a dichotic listening task employing both undirected and directed attention conditions, cerebral asymmetries were examined in matched populations of 32 normal and 32 learning-disabled (LD) children (ages 7 yrs 6 mo–13 yrs 2 mo). The analysis of recall performance indicated that development was not a significant factor in either group; both the normal and LD Ss showed a right-ear effect, although the LD Ss performed at a degraded level and were unable to demonstrate a right-ear advantage (REA) when attention was directed to the left ear, unlike normal Ss, who produced the REA despite the directed attention conditions. Results suggest that LD children probably do not suffer from developmental delays but rather from a defect in callosal functioning that interferes with their ability to process verbal information simultaneously. (41 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Masking produced by broadband noise presented in virtual auditory space

An attempt has been made to relate the masking effects studied under dichotic listening conditions to masking seen in the free field. Rather than use a free-field masking paradigm combined with monaural and binaural listening conditions, broadband maskers presented in virtual auditory space (VAS) have been used. Two virtual locations were tested: One was the right interaural axis (+90 degrees from the anterior midline) and the other was 40 degrees right of the anterior midline. Narrow-band (critical bandwidth) dichotic and diotic maskers were also derived from the VAS masker by bandpass filtering around the test frequency. This procedure preserved the interaural differences within the critical band about the test frequency but removed information outside the critical band. Using a diotic target tone of 0.6 kHz with a narrow-band masker centered on 0.6 kHz there was an increase in signal detection in the dichotic conditions when compared to that attributable to either ear alone. Furthermore, there was no further advantage in signal detection at this target frequency when a broadband VAS masker was used. This suggests that for low-frequency targets, the binaural differences within the critical band about the target frequency are sufficient for effective unmasking. In contrast, for a target frequency of 4 kHz, a dichotic narrow-band masker resulted in a reduction in detection compared to that attributable to either ear. However, detection improved to the level attributable to the far ear when a broadband VAS masker was used. This suggests that information outside the critical band is involved in the unmasking of high-frequency targets.     

Dichotic listening performance in relation to callosal area on the MRI scan.

The structural model of dichotic listening performance predicts reduced left ear scores in people with left hemisphere language dominance and impairment of the corpus callosum. The prediction was tested in patients with multiple sclerosis and evidence on the basis of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of callosal thinning. The results are partly in accordance with the structural model but indicate an effect of attentional set that correlated with quantitative measures of preserved callosal connections. The pattern of ear advantage was reversed in a small group of non-right-handed people. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Development of three strategies of attention in dichotic monitoring.

Investigated 3 strategies of attention in 108 Ss in 3 age groups (7, 11, and 20 yrs). Ss monitored lists of monaural and dichotic words and responded manually to target words. Target detection rates in unequal division of attention (Exp I) showed that selection of the relevant input improved with age. The degree of attenuation of the irrelevant input was dependent on which ear was being ignored, but this effect interacted with age. The 7-yr-olds could not attend effectively to left-ear items. Exp II simplified the focusing strategy by eliminating response requirements to the irrelevant input. Selectivity improved with this strategy, particularly in 7-yr-olds. Equal division of attention between the 2 ears (Exp III) revealed a constant right-ear advantage in each age group. Differentiation of the 3 voluntary strategies improved between ages 7 and 11. In adults, the 3 strategies were clearly distinguished. Results are interpreted in terms of a multiprocess model of attention: Perceptual factors such as dichotic interaction and hemispheric asymmetry were strategy dependent but not age dependent. Voluntary selective attention was age dependent and affected the degree to which hemispheric asymmetry could be overcome. (25 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Allocation of attention in dichotic listening: Differential effects on the detection and localization of signals.

In 2 dichotic listening experiments, 96 normal right-handed adults attended selectively to the left and right ear and divided their attention equally between both ears. Participants listened for specified targets and reported the ear of entry. The material consisted of pairs of consonant–vowel syllables in Experiment 1 and pairs of rhyming consonant–vowel–consonant words in Experiment 2. Both experiments yielded a right-ear advantage for detection and for localization. Attention instructions had no effect on detection. However, focusing attention on 1 ear increased the number of targets attributed to that ear while decreasing the number of targets attributed to the opposite ear. The dissociation between detection and localization indicates that volitional shifts of attention influence late (response selection) processes rather than early (stimulus identification) processes. Selective-listening effects can be accounted for by a 2-stage model in which a fixed input asymmetry is modulated by a biased selection of responses. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Auditory attention in hyperactive children: Effects of stimulant medication on dichotic listening performance.

Administered dichotic digit tasks requiring free report and selective listening, respectively, to 20 6–16 yr old hyperactive children. Ss received methylphenidate before 2 experimental sessions and a placebo before 2 control sessions. The stimulant did not improve free-report performance significantly; rather it facilitated or impaired performance, depending on how it affected the order in which stimuli were reported. Similarly, medication had no effect on overall selective-listening performance, but it increased the difficulty of switching attention from one ear to the other. Results demonstrate that stimulants may act to maintain selective attention and to inhibit channel switching. Listening asymmetry, that is, right-ear superiority, was influenced by task variables but not by stimulant medication. (25 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Selective listening asymmetry in preschool children.

42 right-handed preschoolers listened to dichotic presentations of digit names in 2 experimental sessions. Ss were told to report only the digit arriving at the designated ear; the target ear was designated prior to the dichotic presentation in one session (precuing condition) and after the presentation in the other session (postcuing condition). A significant right-ear superiority was found for all 3 dependent variables: number of correct identifications, total number of digits reported from each ear, and number of intrusion errors. Thus, the procedure demonstrated a marked asymmetry and, therefore, left lateralization of verbal processing in children as young as 3 yrs of age. Since the magnitude of asymmetry was as great in the precuing condition as in the postcuing condition, input factors (perceptual or attentional factors) are sufficient to account for the right-ear superiority. There was no age difference in degree of right-ear advantage. Correlations between asymmetry scores in the 2 sessions ranged between .60 and .68 for the 3 dependent variables. (26 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Prenatal exposure to diethylstilbestrol (DES) and the development of sexually dimorphic cognitive abilities and cerebral lateralization.

Investigated the possibility that the perinatal hormonal environment is related to the development of cognitive sex differences in humans by comparing 25 women who had been exposed prenatally to DES, a synthetic estrogen, to their unexposed sisters. All Ss completed word fluency and spatial relations tests, the Wonderlic Personnel Test, and a dichotic listening task. The DES-exposed Ss showed a more masculine pattern of lateralization (i.e., a stronger right-ear advantage) than did their sisters on a verbal dichotic task. However, no differences were observed between exposed and unexposed Ss in verbal or visuospatial ability. Although interpretation of these data must be cautious, they provide some support for a relationship between high prenatal estrogen levels and the development of masculine-typical function in humans. Implications for previous studies of biological contributions to cognitive sex differences and possible mechanisms for estrogenic effects on the development of lateralization are discussed. (114 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Hemispheric asymmetry in Down's Syndrome children.

Examined auditory processing of linguistic stimulation presented dichotically to groups of 30 Down's Syndrome (DS) children, 20 non-DS retarded children who were MA and CA matched, and 20 MA matched nonretarded children, all of whom were right-handed. Ss completed a knowledge-of-numbers test and the Slosson Intelligence Test. They then listened to 20 trials of a dichotic message at approximately 70–75 db and repeated digits they heard. DS Ss showed a significant left ear advantage in processing the auditory linguistic material, while the other Ss showed the normal right ear advantage. Findings corroborate that having DS has a specific effect on the functional organization of the CNS auditory system. The right hemisphere may not be as efficient as the left hemisphere at language processing. (29 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Distributions of hemispheric asymmetry in left-handers and right-handers: Data from perceptal asymmetry studies.

Although hemispheric asymmetry among individuals is often treated as a categorical variable with 3 values (i.e., left hemisphere dominance, right hemisphere dominance, and bilateral dominance), it is best viewed as a continuously distributed variable ranging from strong asymmetry in favor of the left hemisphere through nearly equal asymmetry to strong asymmetry in favor of the right hemisphere. The present study compared distributions of hemispheric asymmetry in left- and right-handers, based on behavioral indexes of hemispheric asymmetry, such as visual field asymmetry on divided visual field tasks and ear asymmetry on dichotic listening tasks. Meta-analyses of prior studies using these indexes indicate that distributions of hemispheric asymmetry in left- and right-handers differ both in the mean and in the variance. Right-handers have greater mean hemispheric asymmetry than left-, whereas left-handers have greater variance in hemispheric asymmetry than right-handers. Within left-handers, those without sinistral relatives have greater variance in hemispheric asymmetry than those with sinistral relatives, suggesting that sinistral patterns of hemispheric asymmetry determined by environmental factors may be more variable than those determined by genetic factors. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Dichotic listening performance, cognitive ability, and cerebral organization.

Explored linkages between dichotic listening performance, cognitive ability, and cerebral organization, addressing 3 main questions: (1) the relationship of sex, handedness, and familial sinistrality to auditory laterality and to selected aspects of cognitive performance; (2) the relationship between laterality and cognitive ability; and (3) the relationship between verbal and musical laterality. Two dichotic listening tests (one involving recognition of stop consonant-vowel syllables and the other, recognition of melodic patterns) were administered to 120 college students balanced for handedness, sex, and familial sinistrality. Ss also underwent psychometric tests. Results indicate an independence of verbal and nonverbal laterality effects and support a componential (modular) theory of brain organization rather than one of complementarity. (French abstract) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Baseline asymmetries in brain electrical activity predict dichotic listening performance.

Forty-four right-handed participants were assessed on 2 occasions 6 weeks apart on electrophysiological measures of activation asymmetry derived from spectral estimates of electroencephalogram (EEG) alpha power in homologous scalp electrodes. Approximately 4 months following the final EEG assessment. participants were administered a dichotic listening CV-syllables task. Overall, participants exhibited a highly significant right-ear advantage. Differences among individuals in ear asymmetry were predicted by the earlier recorded electrophysiological data. Participants with greater activation in left-sided posterior temporal and parietal regions showed a larger right-ear advantage. In addition, a larger right-ear advantage was predicted by right-sided prefrontal activation. These data indicate that some of the variance in dichotic listening performance can be explained by dispositional activation asymmetries and is associated with a complex pattern of posterior and anterior activation asymmetries. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Acquisition of conditional associations and operant delayed spatial response alternation: Effects of lesions in the medial prefrontal cortex.

8 male rats received bilateral lesions of the medial prefrontal cortex, another 8 rats were control operated. Three weeks after surgery, they were exposed to an autoshaping procedure in which the insertion of a lever into the experimental chamber (conditioned stimulus) always preceded the delivery of a response-independent food pellet (unconditioned stimulus). Ss with lesions acquired this conditional association faster than control. Ss as evidenced by the fact that they were more likely than control Ss to contact the conditioned stimulus at higher rates. Locomotor activity, observed in a standard open-field preceding autoshaping sessions, decreased for both groups of Ss with repeated exposure to the open-field, whereas differences between groups were not observed. Ss were also exposed to an operant delayed spatial response alternation procedure in which they were required to alternate responding between two levers that were inserted into the experimental chamber after delay intervals of either 5, 10, or 20 s had elapsed. Alternation response accuracy of Ss with lesions and control Ss decreased as a function of the duration of the delay interval, but control-operated Ss responded more accurately at each interval duration. Response accuracy increased with prolonged training for both groups of Ss, but faster for control than for Ss with lesions. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Asymmetries of selective listening and attention switching in children.

Administered a selective listening task to 155 normal right-handed 3–12 yr old children. The stimuli consisted of dichotic digits, ranging from single pairs to strings of 4 pairs/trial. Each S attempted to focus attention on 1 ear for 8 practice trials and 28 test trials before switching attention to the opposite ear. Separate analyses of correct responses and intrusion errors yielded almost identical results: There was a significant right-ear advantage (REA) and a developmental increase in overall performance, but there was no developmental change in degree of asymmetry. The REA increased with increasing list length, but independent analyses for each list length failed to reveal any developmental changes in REA. Listening asymmetry was influenced markedly by the order in which the ears were monitored; Ss of all ages had difficulty in switching attention from right ear to left. Results support the developmental invariance hypothesis of cerebral lateralization and demonstrate that auditory asymmetry is not merely a direct reflection of some fixed structural asymmetry in the brain. (54 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)