减孔腹腔镜结合悬吊法与传统腹腔镜手术治疗乙状结肠或直肠上段癌的近期疗效对比

目的探讨减孔腹腔镜手术治疗乙状结肠及直肠上段癌的安全性及可行性。方法 2018年1月～2019年5月我院收住的乙状结肠或直肠上段癌90例,均行结直肠癌根治术。采用随机数字表法将90例病人随机分成传统腹腔镜手术组与减孔腹腔镜手术组,每组各45例,比较两组病人的术中出血量、手术时间、术后首次排气时间、下床时间、住院时间、住院费用、切除肠管长度、术后并发症发生率、清扫淋巴结数目及疼痛评分等相关指标,评估减孔腹腔镜手术的安全性及可行性。结果减孔腹腔镜组总切口长度与术后疼痛评分分别为(6.9±0.7)cm和(1.9±0.8)分,传统腹腔镜组分别为(9.3±0.7)cm和(2.3±0.6)分,两组比较差异均有统计学意义(P0.05);两组手术时间、术中出血量、切除肠管长度、术后排气时间、下床活动时间、住院时间、总费用、淋巴结清扫数目、术后并发症发生率、局部复发率、远处转移率及无病生存期比较差异均无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论减孔腹腔镜结合悬吊法手术治疗乙状结肠癌或直肠上段癌的疗效,与传统腹腔镜手术相当,安全可行。     

直肠、乙状结肠癌腹腔镜根治术六例

本组 6例中男性 4例 ,女性 2例 ,年龄 37～ 72岁 ,平均5 4岁 ,体重 45～ 6 2ｋｇ。其中直肠癌 3例 (距肛门齿状线 4 0～5 0ｃｍ) ,乙状结肠癌 3例 (距肛门 32～ 35ｃｍ)。术前均行纤维结肠镜检查 ,癌肿均为单发 ,并取活检明确诊断。Ｄｕｋｅｓ分期 :Ａ期 1例 ,Ｂ期 5例。1.麻醉方式及体位 :采用全麻 ;取膀胱截石位 ,臀抬高与水平成 30度。2 .手术方式 :直肠癌切除术 :手术人员分为 2组 ,第 1手术组先行腹腔镜下乙状结肠及直肠盆内游离。在腹壁上作4孔 ,其中 1孔位于左下腹麦氏点相对应位置 (利于扩大后用作造瘘口 )。先在乙状结肠中段系膜…     

LigaSure在腹腔镜乙状结肠与直肠癌根治术中的应用

目的探讨LigaSure在腹腔镜下行乙状结肠、直肠癌根治术时的应用效果。方法总结11例经腹腔镜行乙状结肠、直肠癌根治术，术中应用LigaSure对手术操作、手术时间、出血量、并发症的出现及术后恢复等情况进行临床分析。结果11例均完成手术，无中转开腹手术时间110～260min，平均150min。术中出血20～100ml，平均35ml；术后2～3天恢复胃肠功能并下床活动，住院时间5～16天，平均10天。1例Miles患者出现会阴部感染，余无并发症。随访至今，除1例DukesC期患者外余未见转移及复发结论经腹腔镜行乙状结肠、直肠癌根治术，术中应用LigaSure，可以减少出血，缩短于术时间，减少异物残留，增加低化直肠癌保肛率，近期效果满意。     

腹腔镜乙状结肠癌根治术

1腹腔镜乙状结肠癌根治术的适应证及相对禁忌证适应证:位于中部的乙状结肠癌。通常,降结肠、乙状结肠交界处癌按降结肠癌处理,乙状结肠、直肠交界处癌按直肠癌处理。从理论上讲,腹腔镜大肠癌根治术并没有改变手术方式,因而并没有绝对禁忌证,相对禁忌证只是在技术还不够成熟时、在目前的设备条件下对手术开展的一些限制,如广泛的腹腔内粘连、合并易引起出血的基础病变     

免腹部辅助切口联合内镜的腹腔镜乙状结肠直肠癌根治术

腹腔镜结直肠手术在我国已广泛开展．其安全性和疗效已经得到临床研究证实。但是腹腔镜结直肠手术标本取出仍需一约4cm长的辅助切口．这个伤口会增加术后患者痛苦，伤口感染及其他并发症。海南省人民医院自2010年1月至2012年4月对10例结直肠癌患者采用免腹部辅助切口腹腔镜乙状结肠及高位直肠癌根治性切除术．取得满意疗效．现报道如下。     

腹腔镜乙状结肠癌根治术15例

目的探讨腹腔镜乙状结肠癌根治术的临床价值。方法回顾性分析2008年5月至2013年5月腹腔镜下乙状结肠癌根治术15例的临床资料。结果全组15例均在腹腔镜下完成手术,其中9例经体外行端端吻合,5例经肛门行直肠-乙状结肠端端吻合,1例行降结肠端造瘘。术后无吻合口瘘、吻合口出血等并发症发生,手术时间（192．8±33．5）min,平均186．8min,术中出血量（68．5±14．6）ml,平均59．6ml,术后住院时间（8．6±2．5）d,平均9．1d。结论腹腔镜乙状结肠癌根治术手术创伤小、术后恢复快,是治疗乙状结肠癌安全、可行的方法,但术者需有丰富的腹腔镜手术和结肠外科手术经验。     

减孔腹腔镜结肠直肠癌根治术的研究

正自腹腔镜手术成为结肠直肠癌推荐手术方式以来,以传统腹腔镜结肠直肠切除术为基础的各种腹腔镜改良手术方式层出不穷。经自然腔道内镜及单孔腹腔镜手术成为研究的热门,但受其操作难度所限,其学习性及推广性受到一定的约束。为了更好地从传统腹腔镜向其过渡,减孔腹腔镜结肠直肠切除术(reduced port laparoscopic colorectomy, RPLC)进入外科医师的视线。凭借其降低单孔腹腔镜手术的难度     

直肠上段、乙状结肠癌减孔腹腔镜与常规腹腔镜手术的对比研究

目的:对比直肠上段、乙状结肠癌行减孔腹腔镜与常规腹腔镜根治术的治疗效果,探讨减孔腹腔镜手术的安全性、可行性.方法:回顾分析2017年2月至2018年2月收治的80例直肠上段、乙状结肠癌患者的临床资料,将患者分为减孔组与常规组,每组40例.统计分析两组手术相关指标、疼痛程度、炎症变化、胃肠道功能恢复情况、术后并发症、远期...     

三孔法腹腔镜直肠癌根治术的临床研究

目的 通过三孔腹腔镜直肠癌根治术与五孔手术的比较,探讨三孔腹腔镜直肠癌手术的安全性、根治性及近期临床疗效.方法 回顾2012年4月至2013年12月我院外四病区开展的腹腔镜直肠癌根治术,采用配对病例对照设计,筛选出43对患者的临床资料进行分析.结果 三孔组的平均手术时间、术中出血量、清扫淋巴结数目、标本长度、下切缘、术后恢复流质时间、术后并发症率、死亡率等与五孔组差异均无统计学意义;三孔组的材料费用较五孔组少,差异有统计学意义.中位随访时间15个月(3～24个月),随访期内两组复发率、总生存率等差异均无统计学意义.结论 三孔腹腔镜直肠癌手术是安全可行的,能达到五孔手术的肿瘤根治性,并有助于降低手术材料费用,短期疗效满意.     

Urogenital dysfunction after laparoscopic surgery for rectal or sigmoid colon cancer

Background/objectiveUrogenital dysfunction is a common complication after surgery for sigmoid colon or rectal cancers and may result from various causes. Herein, we evaluated urogenital dysfunction and the associated factors after laparoscopic surgery at different follow-up times.MethodsWe conducted a prospective study on 91 patients who were diagnosed with sigmoid colon and rectal cancers and underwent laparoscopic surgery during 2014–2016.Voiding and male and female sexual dysfunctions following surgery were evaluated by the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5), and Female Sexual Function Index-6 (FSFI-6), respectively. Urogenital function was compared at pre-surgery and 3 and 12 months postoperatively, and factors associated with urogenital dysfunction were identified.ResultsThe overall urinary function after surgery was better when compared to that at pre-surgery; however, there was deterioration in both male and female sexual functions. The mean preoperative IPSS, IIEF-5, and FSFI-6 scores were 9.35, 12.18, and 6.09, respectively. The mean differences among IPSS, IIEF-5, and FSFI-6 at 12 months postoperatively and pre-surgery were ?3.08 (95% confidence interval [CI] ?4.77 to ?1.40), ?2.57 (95% CI -4.33 to ?0.80), and ?2.58 (95% CI -4.73 to 0.42), respectively. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that age ≤60 years (odds ratio 4.22) and postoperative complications (odds ratio 2.77) were correlated with erectile dysfunction.ConclusionVoiding function improved after laparoscopic surgery in both sigmoid colon and rectal cancer patients. However, sexual function in both male and female patients was worse. Age ≤60 years and postoperative complications were strongly associated with male sexual dysfunction.     

免辅助切口腹腔镜乙状结肠肿瘤切除术的术式设计及应用

目的:设计免辅助切口腹腔镜乙状结肠肿瘤切除术的术式,探讨手术方法、适应证及安全性、应用价值。方法:回顾分析为2例患者行免辅助切口腹腔镜乙状结肠肿瘤切除术的临床资料,术中均按无瘤及无菌要求施术,标本经自制肛门转换器取出。结果:2例乙状结肠肿瘤患者均成功施行免辅助切口腹腔镜乙状结肠肿瘤切除术,术后患者康复快,肛门排便功能正常,随访0.5～1年,均无复发。结论:免辅助切口腹腔镜乙状结肠切除术符合现代微创外科的要求,近期疗效良好,美容效果满意,具有临床实用价值,远期疗效尚待进一步研究。     

Single incision vs conventional laparoscopic anterior resection for sigmoid colon cancer: a case-matched study

Background

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the safety and effects of single-incision laparoscopic anterior resection (SILAR) for sigmoid colon cancer by comparing it with conventional laparoscopic anterior resection (CLAR).

Methods

Twenty-four patients who underwent SILAR between April 2010 and July 2011 were case matched 1:2 with patients who underwent CLAR, with respect to age, sex, body mass index, tumor location, and history of abdominal surgery.

Results

Two patients in the SILAR group and 1 patient in the CLAR group experienced anastomotic leakage. The operative time was longer in the SILAR group than in the CLAR group (251 ± 50 vs 237 ± 49 minutes; P = .253). The number of harvested lymph nodes (19.6 ± 10.7 vs 20.8 ± 7.7; P = .630) was not different. The postoperative hospital stay was shorter in the SILAR group (7.1 ± 3.4 days) than in the CLAR group (8.1 ± 3.5 days) (P = .234).

Conclusions

On the basis of the early outcomes, we conclude that SILAR is feasible and safe. Moreover, the adequate lymph node harvest and free margins support the use of this procedure.     

保留左结肠动脉的乙状结肠癌根治术的疗效分析

【摘要】 目的 探讨保留左结肠动脉(LCA)的乙状结肠癌根治术的术式安全性和可行性。方法 回顾性分析2010年4月至2013年5月开腹下行保LCA的乙状结肠癌根治术手术(n=32,LCA保留组),采用历史对照的方法,评估保LCA组和肠系膜下动脉根部结扎的传统乙状结肠癌根治术(n=43,传统组)两组患者的手术效果、临床病理资料以及术后并发症。结果 保LCA组和传统手术组的平均手术时间和出血量亦未见明显差异。但LCA组与传统手术组相比,切除的近端肠管(11.5 cm vs 16.7 cm)和远端肠管(5.8 cm vs 8.7 cm)长度更短,差异具有显著的统计学差异(P<0.05)。LCA组并不减少术后活检淋巴结的个数,亦未见主淋巴结群活检的淋巴结个数(2.3枚 vs 2.1枚)及阳性淋巴结个数(0.2枚 vs 0.3枚)减少。两组患者术后并发症的比较并无明显的差别。结论 保LCA的乙状结肠癌根治术治疗乙状结肠癌是可行、安全、有效的,可保证肠系膜下动脉根部淋巴结的根治性,并不增加手术的风险。     

直肠乙状结肠部分切除联合直肠固定术治疗成人完全型直肠脱垂

目的 探讨成人完全型直肠脱垂采用直肠乙状结肠部分切除联合直肠固定术的手术疗效.方法 2006-2011年,收治的6例成人完全型直肠脱垂患者,采用直肠乙状结肠部分切除联合直肠固定术进行手术治疗.结果 6例患者全部治愈,术后平均住院时间为13.7 d,随访3～61个月,无复发病例.结论 直肠乙状结肠部分切除联合直肠固定术治...     

肠系膜下动脉结扎方式对乙状结肠癌和直肠癌患者预后影响的Meta分析

目的 评价肠系膜下动脉低位或高位结扎对乙状结肠癌和直肠癌患者术后5年生存率和手术死亡率的影响.方法 采用Meta分析的方法综合评价2009年12月1日前国内外公开发表的关于肠系膜下动脉低位或高位结扎对乙状结肠癌和直肠癌患者术后5年生存率、手术死亡率影响的文献.结果 筛选出符合纳入和排除标准的文献共7篇,其中低位结扎组与高位结扎组5年生存率比较,合并值OR＝0.87（95% CI：0.76～0.98,P＝0.02）;手术死亡率合并值（OR）＝1.26（95% CI：0.92～1.72,P＝0.15）.结论 高位结扎肠系膜下动脉的手术死亡率并不高于低位结扎,但可能提高乙状结肠癌和直肠癌患者术后5年生存率.     

Laparoscopic resection of sigmoid colon cancer with intestinal malrotation: A case report

IntroductionIntestinal malrotation is a congenital abnormality which occurs due to a failure of the normal 270° rotation of the midgut. The non-rotation type is usually asymptomatic and discovered incidentally on imaging studies. Intestinal malrotation accompanied by colon cancer is extremely rare.Presentation of caseA 53-year-old male presented with postprandial abdominal discomfort. Colonoscopy showed a 14 mm polyp in the sigmoid colon and endoscopic polypectomy was performed. Pathological evaluation revealed an adenocarcinoma invading the submucosa more than 1000 μm with positive vertical and horizontal margins. A contrast enhanced computed tomography scan showed an anatomic variant of the ileocolic and inferior mesenteric arteries originating from a common channel branching from the abdominal aorta. Laparoscopic sigmoid colon resection was performed. The patient did well post operatively.DiscussionThe usual trocar placement for laparoscopic left side colectomy was used, and we found no difficulties intraoperatively. To secure safe ligation, the divisions of the common channel branching from the abdominal aorta were exposed as in a usual D3 dissection, and the inferior mesenteric artery was ligated after confirmation of the bifurcation of the ileocolic and inferior mesenteric artery.ConclusionTo the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of laparoscopic resection of a sigmoid colon cancer with intestinal malrotation. It was performed without difficulty using the usual trocar placement, with appropriate attention to the variant in vascular anatomy.