分散液液微萃取技术的研究进展

分散液液微萃取是一种基于传统液液萃取的新型样品前处理技术。该文以分散液液微萃取技术中萃取剂的筛选为出发点,综述了低密度萃取剂、辅助萃取剂、反萃取剂和离子液体等低毒性萃取剂在该技术中的应用,以及应用自制装置、溶剂去乳化、悬浮萃取剂固化,辅助萃取,反萃取和离子液体-分散液液微萃取等萃取模式;并简要评述了该技术与液液萃取、固相萃取、固相微萃取、分散固相萃取、基质固相分散萃取、超临界流体萃取、超声辅助萃取等其他样品前处理技术的联用特性。     

分散液液微萃取技术及其在生物样品分析中的研究进展

分散液液微萃取是一种新型微萃取技术,具有易操作、低成本、耗时短、环境友好、萃取效率高等优点。该文着眼于分散液液微萃取技术中萃取剂的性质及辅助分散方式,综述了常规分散液液微萃取、离子液体分散液液微萃取、超声辅助分散液液微萃取等多种萃取模式,并重点归纳总结了近5年分散液液微萃取技术在生物样品分析领域的应用进展。     

分散液液微萃取-气相色谱法测定水样中甲拌磷农药

建立了基于分散液液微萃取(DLLME)的新型样品前处理方法,并采用气相色谱/氢火焰离子化检测器对水样中痕量的甲拌磷农药进行了测定。考察了影响分散液液微萃取的因素包括萃取溶剂、分散剂、样品体积、萃取温度和离心速度等。在最佳实验条件下,对甲拌磷的富集倍数达到300倍;检出限为0.001μL/L;方法的线性范围为0.01~10μL/L,R2为0.9986;相对标准偏差为6.65%;回收率为104%。将分散液液微萃取法与单滴液相微萃取和离子液体-液相微萃取方法进行了对比,结果表明,分散液液微萃取技术具有操作简单、快捷(前处理时间小于5 min)、富集效果好、回收率高等优点。同时预言,将离子液体与分散液液微萃取结合,将会产生更加满意的结果。     

分散液液微萃取–高效液相色谱法测定尿液中的阿替洛尔

建立基于离子液体–分散液液微萃取–高效液相色谱法检测尿液中阿替洛尔的新型分析方法.将环境友好的萃取剂离子液体和分散剂乙腈的混合溶液快速注入样品中,瞬间完成高效的萃取过程.在低温条件下,将下层的离子液体固化,实现萃取剂高效地收集,用高效液相色谱–二极管阵列检测器进行定量分析.阿替洛尔的质量浓度在0.01～1μg/mL范围...     

离子液体在微萃取方面的应用进展

离子液体具有蒸汽压低、热稳定性好、溶解性能高、可设计性和多样性等特性,使其在萃取尤其是微萃取方面得到迅速发展和应用.而在单滴微萃取、分散液相微萃取、液-液-液微萃取和固相微萃取中,离子液体更以其较大的粘度、密度及非挥发性等特性,使得微萃取技术更容易操作,无有机溶剂污染,方法的灵敏度更高,且扩展了微萃取的应用范围.文章综述了近年来离子液体在液相微萃取和固相微萃取方面的应用进展,并对其发展趋势进行了展望.     

基于离子液体的磁性富集技术及其在分析化学中的应用进展

磁固相萃取是一种基于磁性材料而发展起来的新型样品前处理技术,是目前样品预处理领域的研究热点,其中有关磁性吸附材料的研究是该技术的关键。离子液体是一种由有机阳离子和有机或无机阴离子构成的液态有机盐类,因挥发性低,化学及热稳定性好以及对有机物、无机物具有良好的溶解性而成为富集水溶液中有机污染物和重金属离子的新型吸附材料,但将其用于磁固相萃取的研究尚处于起步阶段。本文总结了磁性富集技术中所用的离子液体,并将目前基于离子液体的磁性富集技术归纳为基于离子液体功能化磁性微球的磁固相萃取、混合半胶束磁固相萃取、离子液体参与的双磁微萃取3类。并综述了基于离子液体的磁性富集技术在环境、食品及生物样品前处理方面的应用研究,简要总结了根据待测物质选择基于离子液体的磁性富集技术的原则,并对基于离子液体的磁性富集技术未来的发展方向进行了展望。     

分散液液微萃取技术在食品分析中的应用进展

近年来,分散液液微萃取作为一种新型液相微萃取(LPME)技术受到广泛关注。该技术具有操作简单、有机溶剂用量少、富集倍数高等显著优点,已被广泛用于各类样品基质中无机和有机分析物的提取。但由于传统分散液液微萃取技术的萃取剂以高毒性有机溶剂为主,且选择性差,从而严重限制了该技术的应用。为此,最近几年发展了许多操作模式,如低密度萃取剂分散液液微萃取、悬浮固化分散液液微萃取、调节萃取剂密度的分散液液微萃取、离子液体-分散液液微萃取、水溶液作为萃取剂的反相分散液液微萃取等。该文综述了分散液液微萃取技术原理、萃取过程和影响因素(如萃取剂与分散剂种类和体积、p H值、离子强度、萃取时间等),并对其在食品分析中的应用进展进行了系统总结。     

离子液体在微萃取技术中的应用

离子液体是在室温或近于室温下呈液态的熔盐体系,由特定阳离子和阴离子构成。与传统的液态物质相比,离子液体几乎没有蒸气压、不易挥发、能溶解许多无机物和有机物。在样品前处理技术中得到了广泛的应用。微萃取技术是一种简便快速、提取效率高、溶剂用量少、环境友好的样品前处理技术。本文综述了离子液体在微萃取技术(液相微萃取和固相微萃取)中的应用。     

金属检测中新型前处理技术研究进展及应用

精准检测环境和食品中金属含量对环境保护和人体健康至关重要.样品的准备环节是造成样品损失和二次污染的关键步骤, 因此合适的前处理方法可以提高金属分析的选择性和灵敏度.从液相萃取和非液相萃取新技术两方面综述了浊点萃取、离子液体、超分子溶剂-分散液液微萃取、顶空固相微萃取技术、超临界流体萃取特点及在复杂样品前处理中的应用和研究进展, 并对其未来发展方向进行了展望.     

PVC固载离子液体选择性分离碱性蛋白的研究

近年来,离子液体被广泛应用于生物大分子的萃取分离~([1]).对于液液萃取(包括离子液体微乳和双水相萃取),离子液体消耗量比较大,而且离子液体黏度较大造成其定量操作十分困难,因此离子液体的固载化越来越受到人们重视.     

Recent development in liquid phase microextraction for determination of trace level concentration of metals—A review

As the drive towards green extraction methods has gained momentum in recent years, it has not always been possible to eliminate organic solvents completely. However, the volumes employed have been reduced remarkably, so that a single microdrop is sufficient in some cases. This effort has led to the development of various liquid phase microextractions namely single drop microextraction (SDME), hollow fiber liquid phase microextraction (HF-LPME), dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) and solidified floating organic drop microextraction (SFODME). In this review, the historical development and overview of these miniaturized liquid phase extraction methodologies have briefly been discussed and a comprehensive collection of application of the these methods in combination with different analytical techniques for preconcentration and determination of ultra trace amounts of metals and organometal ions in various matrices have been summarized.     

水和白酒中异味物质检测的研究进展

综述了水和白酒中异味物质检测的样品前处理方法(包括液液萃取、固相萃取、液相微萃取、固相微萃取、搅拌棒吸附萃取、吹扫捕集、顶空等)和检测方法(包括气相色谱法、气相色谱-质谱法、气相色谱-飞行时间质谱法)的研究进展(引用文献52篇)。     

Deep eutectic solvents for the purification of chloromycetin and thiamphenicol from milk

Deep eutectic solvents were used in both dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction and solid‐phase extraction for the purification of chloromycetin and thiamphenicol from milk. In the dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction procedure, deep eutectic solvents mixed with chloroform at different ratios (0:1–5:1, v/v) were used as the extraction agent to optimize the procedure, and the ratio of 2:1 v/v was found to be the best extraction agent with 87.23 and 83.17% recoveries of chloromycetin and thiamphenicol, respectively. Furthermore, deep eutectic solvents were also used to modify molecular imprinted polymers in solid‐phase extraction procedure, and the polymers were used to purify chloromycetin and thiamphenicol from milk. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy were used to characterize the polymers. The solid‐phase extraction recoveries with deep eutectic solvents with molecularly imprinted polymers (chloromycetin and thiamphenicol, two templates), molecularly imprinted polymers (without deep eutectic solvents), and nonimprinted polymers (without a template) for chloromycetin were 91.23, 82.64, and 57.3%, respectively, and recoveries for thiamphenicol were 87.02, 79.03, and 52.27%, respectively. The recoveries of chloromycetin and thiamphenicol from milk in the solid‐phase extraction procedure were higher than using deep eutectic solvents mixed with chloroform as the extraction agent in the dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction procedure.     

Application of ionic liquid in liquid phase microextraction technology

Ionic liquids (ILs) are novel nonmolecular solvents. Their unique properties, such as high thermal stability, tunable viscosity, negligible vapor pressure, nonflammability, and good solubility for inorganic and organic compounds, make them excellent candidates as extraction media for a range of microextraction techniques. Many physical properties of ILs can be varied, and the structural design can be tuned to impart the desired functionality and enhance the analyte extraction selectivity, efficiency, and sensitivity. This paper provides an overview of the applications of ILs in liquid phase microextraction technology, such as single‐drop microextraction, hollow fiber based liquid phase microextraction, and dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction. The sensitivity, linear calibration range, and detection limits for a range of target analytes in the methods were analyzed to determine the advantages of ILs in liquid phase microextraction.     

Novel mode of liquid‐phase microextraction: A magnetic stirrer as the extractant phase holder

In the present study, a novel configuration of liquid‐phase microextraction was proposed, in which a magnetic stirrer with a groove was used as the extractant phase holder. It was termed as magnetic stirrer liquid‐phase microextraction. In this way, the stability of the organic solvent was much improved under high stirring speed; the extraction efficiency was enhanced due to the enormously enlarged contact area between the organic solvent and aqueous phase. The extraction performance of the magnetic stirrer liquid‐phase microextraction was studied using chlorobenzenes as the probe analytes. A wide linearity range (20 pg/mL to 200 ng/mL) with a satisfactory linearity coefficient (r² > 0.998) was obtained. Limits of detection ranged from 9.0 to 12.0 pg/mL. Good reproducibility was achieved with intra‐ and inter‐day relative standard deviations <4.8%. The proposed magnetic stirrer liquid‐phase microextraction was simple, environmentally friendly and efficient; compared to single‐drop microextraction, it had obvious advantages in terms of reproducibility and extraction efficiency. It is a promising miniaturized liquid‐phase technology for real applications.     

Recent advances and trends in miniaturized sample preparation techniques

Advances in the area of sample preparation are significant and have been growing significantly in recent years. This initial step of the analysis is essential and must be carried out properly, consisting of a complicated procedure with multiple stages. Consequently, it corresponds to a potential source of errors and will determine, at the end of the process, either a satisfactory result or a fail. One of the advances in this field includes the miniaturization of extraction techniques based on the conventional sample preparation procedures such as liquid‐liquid extraction and solid‐phase extraction. These modern techniques have gained prominence in the face of traditional methods since they minimize the consumption of organic solvents and the sample volume. As another feature, it is possible to reuse the sorbents, and its coupling to chromatographic systems might be automated. The review will emphasize the main techniques based on liquid‐phase microextraction, as well as those based upon the use of sorbents. The first group includes currently popular techniques such as single drop microextraction, hollow fiber liquid‐phase microextraction, and dispersive liquid‐liquid microextraction. In the second group, solid‐phase microextraction techniques such as in‐tube solid‐phase microextraction, stir bar sorptive extraction, dispersive solid‐phase extraction, dispersive micro solid‐phase microextraction, and microextraction by packed sorbent are highlighted. These approaches, in common, aim the determination of analytes at low concentrations in complex matrices. This article describes some characteristics, recent advances, and trends on miniaturized sample preparation techniques, as well as their current applications in food, environmental, and bioanalysis fields.     

多孔中空纤维液相微萃取技术的研究进展

基于多孔中空纤维的液相微萃取集采样、萃取和浓缩于一体,具有成本低,易与多种分析仪器联用等特点,该技术不仅可得到较高的富集倍数和回收率,而且具有突出的样品净化功能,有机溶剂用量非常少,是一种环境友好的样品前处理新技术,国内尚未广泛应用。本文综述了多孔中空纤维液相微萃取的主要装置、萃取模式、影响因素及其应用,引用文献54篇。     

Determination of Diuretics in Urine Using Immobilized Multi‐Walled Carbon Nanotubes in Hollow Fiber Liquid‐Phase Microextraction Combined with Liquid Chromatography‐Tandem Mass Spectrometry

A novel technique utilizing the adsorptive potential of immobilized multi‐walled carbon nanotubes (I‐MWCNT) in hollow fiber liquid‐phase microextraction (HF‐LPME) was developed for the determination of diuretics in urine. In this study, the potential of carbon nanotubes as a sorbent for three‐phase liquid‐phase microextraction of diuretics from urine samples was evaluated. Analysis was performed using liquid chromatography‐tandem mass spectrometry (LC‐MS/MS). A novel method was applied to detect acetazolamide (AAA), chlorothiazide (CTA), hydrochlorothiazide (HCT), hydroflumethiazide (HFT), clopamide (CA), trichlormethiazide (TCM), althiazide (AT) and bendroflumethiazide (BFT) in urine. Two‐step extractions using different times and temperatures for each step were adopted. Parameters influencing the extraction efficiency, including the extraction solvent, sample pH, salt concentration, extraction time and extraction temperature were systematically optimized. Under the resulting optimal extraction conditions, this method showed good linearity over an analytes concentration range of 1 to 1000 ng/mL, high extraction repeatability with relative standard deviations of less than 6%, and low detection limits (0.09 to 0.51 ng/mL). The application of the methods to the determination of diuretics in real samples was tested by analyzing urine samples of patient.     

On‐line extraction and determination of two herbicides: Comparison between two modes of three‐phase hollow fiber microextraction

Two different modes of three‐phase hollow fiber liquid‐phase microextraction were studied for the extraction of two herbicides, bensulfuron‐methyl and linuron. In these two modes, the acceptor phases in the lumen of the hollow fiber were aqueous and organic solvents. The extraction and determination were performed using an automated hollow fiber microextraction instrument followed by high‐performance liquid chromatography. For both three‐phase hollow fiber liquid‐phase microextraction modes, the effect of the main parameters on the extraction efficiency were investigated and optimized by central composite design. Under optimal conditions, both modes showed good linearity and repeatability, but the three‐phase hollow fiber liquid‐phase microextraction based on two immiscible organic solvents has a better extraction efficiency and figures of merit. The calibration curves for three‐phase hollow fiber liquid‐phase microextraction with an organic acceptor phase were linear in the range of 0.3–200 and 0.1–150 μg/L and the limits of detection were 0.1 and 0.06 μg/L for bensulfuron‐methyl and linuron, respectively. For the conventional three‐phase hollow fiber liquid‐phase microextraction, the calibration curves were linear in the range of 3.0–250 and 15–400 μg/L and LODs were 1.0 and 5.0 μg/L for bensulfuron‐methyl and linuron, respectively. The real sample analysis was carried out by three‐phase hollow fiber liquid phase microextraction based on two immiscible organic solvents because of its more favorable characteristics.     

Use of volatile organic solvents in headspace liquid‐phase microextraction by direct cooling of the organic drop using a simple cooling capsule

A low‐cost and simple cooling‐assisted headspace liquid‐phase microextraction device for the extraction and determination of 2,6,6‐trimethyl‐1,3 cyclohexadiene‐1‐carboxaldehyde (safranal) in Saffron samples, using volatile organic solvents, was fabricated and evaluated. The main part of the cooling‐assisted headspace liquid‐phase microextraction system was a cooling capsule, with a Teflon microcup to hold the extracting organic solvent, which is able to directly cool down the extraction phase while the sample matrix is simultaneously heated. Different experimental factors such as type of organic extraction solvent, sample temperature, extraction solvent temperature, and extraction time were optimized. The optimal conditions were obtained as: extraction solvent, methanol (10 μL); extraction temperature, 60°C; extraction solvent temperature, 0°C; and extraction time, 20 min. Good linearity of the calibration curve (R² = 0.995) was obtained in the concentration range of 0.01–50.0 μg/mL. The limit of detection was 0.001 μg/mL. The relative standard deviation for 1.0 μg/mL of safranal was 10.7% (n = 6). The proposed cooling‐assisted headspace liquid‐phase microextraction device was coupled (off‐line) to high‐performance liquid chromatography and used for the determination of safranal in Saffron samples. Reasonable agreement was observed between the results of the cooling‐assisted headspace liquid‐phase microextraction high‐performance liquid chromatography method and those obtained by a validated ultrasound‐assisted solvent extraction procedure.