Risk factors that can influence kidney transplant outcome

The survival and function of a kidney transplant are influenced by numerous immunological and nonimmunological factors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of a number of cadaveric donor parameters on transplanted kidney function, and in particular on the occurrence of delayed graft function (DGF) since DGF is one of the most important factors in long-term organ survival. This study looked at 143 patients who underwent kidney transplant of whom 32 displayed DGF. The creatinine levels in organ recipients, which were evaluated during a follow-up that ranged between 6 months and 4 years, were significantly higher among recipients who developed DGF after transplant (1.8 +/- 0.7 vs 1.4 +/- 0.4; P = .02). The following donor parameters were taken into consideration: history of diabetes and hypertension; creatinine levels; inotropie therapy; problems relating to hemodynamics (hypotension and/or cardiac arrest); and cold ischemia time. We observed that a donor history of hypertension (46.8% DGF vs 23.27% no DGF; P = .01) and high levels of donor creatinine prior to organ removal (1.9 +/- 1.2 mg/dL DGF vs 1.2 +/- 0.9 mg/dL no DGF; P = .007) were significant risk factors for DGF among kidney recipients. No significant differences were found for others factors between recipients with versus without DGF.     

Renal transplants with delayed graft function show decreased renal function despite monitoring with postabsorptive levels

Cyclosporine (CyA) monitoring with postabsorptive levels can predict the risk of an acute rejection episode (ARE). Large doses of CyA are needed to obtain adequate drug exposure. The impact of this strategy on renal function, especially in patients with delayed graft function (DGF), is unknown. We report our experience comparing C3 (3-hour postdose) monitoring with a historical series of cadaveric renal transplants. Sixty-three consecutive patients who received cadaveric renal transplants were followed for 1 year. Group A (historical n = 31) patients received 6 mg/kg/d CyA with the dose adjusted according to the trough level (target, 250-350 ng/mL), group B (study n = 32) received 10 mg/kg/d CyA with dose adjustments based upon C3 (target, 1100-1500 ng/mL). All patients received cyclosporine prednisone and a third agents. The general characteristics of the donors and recipients were comparable. The incidence of biopsy-proven ARE at 1 year in group A was 42% and 19% in group B (P <.05). Patients achieving C3 levels >1000 ng/mL at 1 week displayed significantly lower ARE rates (8% vs 50%; P <.05). The rate of DGF was similar in both groups, but the duration was longer in group B (15 vs 21 days, P <.05). The serum creatinine (SCr) level was significantly higher in group B at 3 months (1.47 mg/dL group A vs 1.76 mg/dL group B; P <.05). Patients in group B with DGF showed significantly higher SCr values at 1 year (1.18mg% vs 2.03 mg%; P <.05). C3 level monitoring of CyA yields excellent results in terms of decreased ARE, but an increased SCR was observed among patients with DGF.     

Sirolimus delays recovery from posttransplant renal failure in kidney graft recipients

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of sirolimus and cyclosporine (CsA) combined therapy on the incidence and duration of delayed graft function (DGF), and the impact of the latter on 1-year graft function. The study entailed 23 cadaveric renal recipients treated with sirolimus-CsA-prednisone regimen (sirolimus group). The reference group entailed 23 patients treated with CsA-azathioprine-prednisone. In the sirolimus group the frequency of DGF was 39% and was essentially the same as in reference group (34.8%). The duration of DGF was significantly longer in SRL group and lasted 21.2 +/- 12.2 days versus 6.8 +/- 2.5 in reference group (P = .004). Serum creatinine level decreased below 3.0 mg/dL after 36 +/- 22 days in sirolimus group versus 16.8 +/- 6 days in reference group (P < .04). Cold ischemia was slightly longer and donors were older in DGF patients in both groups. Sirolimus dose during first month was higher in DGF patients (3.5 versus 2.6 mg), whereas level of CsA was lower (230 versus 310 ng/mL). Biopsy-proven acute rejection (AR) occurred in most of DGF patients and during the DGF period. Serum creatinine level at the 12th month posttransplant was higher in DGF versus non-DGF patients (2.0 +/- 0.5 versus 1.5 +/- 0.4 mg/dL). One-year patient and graft survival was 100% in sirolimus group and 100% and 95% in reference group. In conclusion, sirolimus significantly retards the recovery from posttransplant renal failure; however, it does not increase the incidence of DGF. Patients who suffered from posttransplant acute renal failure had worse renal function at 1 year after transplantation, independent of the treatment protocol.     

Solitary renal allografts from pediatric cadaver donors less than 2 years of age transplanted into adult recipients

BACKGROUND: Transplantation of solitary pediatric renal allografts from donors 2 years of age or younger into adult recipients is controversial. METHODS: Between 1998 and 2001, 15 solitary renal allografts from pediatric donors 2 years of age or younger were transplanted into adult recipients. Thirty-three en bloc renal allografts transplanted between 1994 and 2001 were used for comparison. En bloc kidneys were considered for separation if they measured greater than or equal to 6 cm in length. Renal function (creatinine clearance [CrCl]) was estimated using the Cockroft-Gault formula. RESULTS: Two-year graft survival for the solitary and en bloc groups were 93% and 77%, respectively (P =0.405). Five grafts were lost because of arterial thrombosis (four en bloc and one solitary). Ureteral complications occurred in three grafts in the en bloc group. One-year postoperative CrCl of the surviving solitary (n=14) and en bloc (n=26) grafts were 51.4+/-26.2 mL/min and 55.1+/-27.5 mL/min (P >0.05), respectively. Donor weight and kidney length were greater in the solitary group (14.3+/-3.5 kg and 6.3+/-0.4 cm, respectively) compared with the en bloc group (10.8+/-2.6 kg and 5.9+/-0.3 cm, respectively) (P =0.001 and P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Separation of en bloc pairs into solitary allografts can be considered when the graft measures greater than or equal to 6 cm in length and donor weight is greater than or equal to 14 kg. The transplantation of solitary pediatric kidneys into adult recipients is successful, and the majority of pediatric en bloc allografts can be separated before transplantation.     

Delayed graft function: risk factors and the relative effects of early function and acute rejection on long-term survival in cadaveric renal transplantation

Delayed graft function (DGF) and acute rejection have both been associated with reduced renal allograft survival. In some studies, they have been shown to have an interactive effect. We studied the risk factors for DGF and the relative impact of DGF and rejection on both short- and long-term survival in recipients of cadaveric renal transplants. Data from the Oxford Transplant Centre Database were assessed on 710 cadaver allografts over a 10-yr period, during which time all recipients received cyclosporin-based immunosuppressive protocols. The interaction between DGF and acute rejection was examined using logistic and Cox multivariate regression. Long cold ischaemia time (CIT), sensitisation and older donor age were found to be independent predictors of DGF. The occurrence of DGF resulted in a reduced 5-yr survival (56 vs. 75%). However, the effect of DGF was confined to the first year post-transplant, as there was no significant difference in survival, as measured by half-life (t1/2) of grafts functioning at 1 yr, with DGF alone and a group with good early function (t1/2 = 21.3 vs. 20.0 yr). There was no increase in acute rejection in grafts with DGF. However, the combination of DGF and acute rejection resulted in the worst short-term graft survival (68% at 1 yr, compared to 92.3% in those grafts with no DGF or acute rejection) and this continued over the long term (t1/2 = 10.5 yr). These data suggest that early function is critical to the success of renal transplantation. The effects of DGF are limited to the first year post-transplant. Long-term graft survival may be improved by efforts to limit CITs, particularly for grafts from older donors and sensitised recipients.     

Similar impact of slow and delayed graft function on renal allograft outcome and function

Kidney transplant patients can be divided into three groups, according to the initial graft function. First-week dialyzed patients form the delayed graft function (DGF) group. Nondialyzed patients are divided into slow graft function (SGF) or immediate graft function (IGF) according to whether the day 5 serum creatinine was higher versus lower than 3 mg/dL, respectively. SGF patients showed worse graft survival, above higher incidence of acute rejection and lower renal function than IGF patients, although few reports have analyzed outcomes in these groups. We analyzed the impact of SGF on graft survival, first-year renal function, and incidence of acute rejection in 291 renal transplant patients. Creatinine was significantly worse at 12 months for SGF and DGF than for IGF patients (1.9 +/- 0.8 mg/dL, 1.8 +/- 0.7 mg/dL, 1.5 +/- 0.5 mg/dL, respectively; P < .05). There was no difference in first-year renal function between SGF and DGF. The acute rejection rate was higher among the SGF than the IGF group (45% vs 21%, P < .05), but not different from DGF patients (42%, P < .05). Graft survival was better among IGF than SGF or DGF patients, with no significant difference between the last two groups (3-year graft survival, 82%, 71%, 70%, respectively; log-rank test, P < .05). Kidney transplant recipients who develop SGF have a worse outcome than patients with IGF, similar to DGF patients. SGF patients show worse graft survival, worse renal function, and higher acute rejection rates than IGF patients, despite not needing dialysis.     

Risk factors for delayed kidney function and impact of delayed function on patient and graft survival in adult graft recipients

The influence of delayed kidney graft function on allograft outcome is described controversially in the literature. The aim of the study was to evaluate possible risk factors for delayed graft function (DGF) and investigate the impact of DGF on short- and long-term renal allograft function. Two groups were formed: the first one consisted of patients who gained immediate graft function (IGF) (n = 64) after transplantation and the second group included patients with DGF (n = 31; with at least one dialysis needed in first week after transplantation). The DGF group had a statistically significant longer duration on dialyses prior to transplantation (DGF 54 vs. IGF 33 months; p < 0.05), on average more frequently a re-transplantation (DGF 1.7 vs. IGF 1.3; p < 0.01), a longer re-anastomosis time (DGF 52.9 vs. 44.2 min; p < 0.01), a lower systolic (DGF 136 +/-24 mmHg vs. IGF 158 +/- 25; p < 0.001) and diastolic blood pressure (DGF 78 +/- 14 vs. IGF 89 +/- 16 mmHg; p < 0.01) at admission to the hospital and a higher serum (S)-creatinine at discharge (DGF 2.5 +/- 1.6 vs. IGF 1.6 +/- 0.4 mg/dL; p < 0.01). Prior to transplantation the DGF group had more often advanced vascular diseases (DGF 29.0 vs. IGF 12.5%; p < 0.01) and these patients incurred more frequently new ones during the next 3 yr after transplantation (DGF 22.6 vs. IGF 6.3%; p < 0.001). After 3 yr the graft survival tended to be lower in the DGF group (DGF 74.2 vs. IGF 84.4%; NS), but this difference was not statistically significant.     

Ascorbic acid against reperfusion injury in human renal transplantation

The cadaveric renal graft is exposed to ischaemic injury during preservation and to oxidative damage during reperfusion. Both these mechanisms are known to cause cell damage, which may impair graft function. Reperfusion injury (RPI) is mediated by reactive oxygen species (ROS). Ascorbic acid (AA) is a potent physiological extracellular scavenger of ROS. We perfused 31 renal grafts immediately before implantation with a solution of Euro-Collins containing 0.5 mg/ml of AA to diminish RPI. From every donor, the contralateral kidney served as a control. The control grafts were perfused with the same perfusion as those of the AA group, only without the AA substitution. We assessed the effect of AA by recording serum creatinine, creatinine clearance, initial graft function and early rejections. The incidence of delayed graft function (DGF) was 32% in the AA group, and 29% in the control group. Other parameters were also similar in both groups, except for the length of DGF, which showed a trend towards a shorter duration in the AA group. The pre-operative systemic AA concentration was significantly ( P=0.01) lower in the haemodialysis patients than in those on peritoneal dialysis. In conclusion, this clinical study could not demonstrate significant benefits of AA in renal transplantation.     

Transplantation of pediatric cadaveric kidneys into adult or pediatric recipients

In Japan, nationwide cadaveric organ sharing for kidney transplantation by the Japan Organ Transplant Network (JOTN) has operated since April 1995. This study retrospectively analyzed the long-term results of single pediatric donor kidneys transplanted into adult or pediatric recipients at a single center. From March 1983 to December 2002, 281 cadaveric renal allografts were transplanted at our center, including, 17 recipients of cadaveric kidneys from donors aged less than 16 years. We divided these 17 recipients into two groups: 10 adult recipients (group 1; G1) and seven pediatric recipients (group 2; G2). HLA-AB, -DR mismatches were 1.3 +/- 1.3, 0.7 +/- 0.5 in G1 and 2.6 +/- 1.3, 1.4 +/- 0.8 in G2, respectively (P < .05 for both). The end of the observation of this study was March 2003. Among G1, two recipients died with functioning grafts and one died after graft loss. Among G2, no recipients died. Patient survival rates at 1 and 5 years were 90% and 80% in G1 and 100% and 100% in G2, respectively. At the end of the observation in this study, five recipients among G1 and six recipients among G2 had functioning grafts. Graft survival rates at 1 and 5 years were 90% and 80% in G1 and 85.7% and 85.7% in G2, respectively. Our results demonstrate that transplantation of pediatric cadaveric kidneys into pediatric recipients was excellent compared to adult recipients in terms of survival. Priority to pediatric patients should be given especially in cases of pediatric donors.     

Incidence of latent mesangial IgA deposition in renal allograft donors in Japan

BACKGROUND: Mesangial immunoglobulin A (IgA) deposition is incidentally encountered in asymptomatic individuals, but its precise frequency and significance had not been clarified. The background of the latent IgA deposition is related to the epidemiology and pathogenesis of IgA nephropathy. METHODS: Zero-hour allograft biopsies were performed in 510 renal transplantations (446 living donors, and 64 cadaveric donors) at the Kidney Center of Tokyo Women's Medical University. Mesangial IgA and C3 deposition were analyzed immunohistochemically, and the frequency and clinicopathologic features of mesangial IgA deposition were investigated. RESULTS: Mesangial IgA deposition was present in 82 (16.1%) of the total 510 allografts with no statistical difference between living donors (72/446, 16.1%) and cadaveric donors (10/64, 15.6%) or between blood-related donors (66/392, 16.8%) and nonblood-related donors (16/110, 14.5%). Mesangial C3 deposition was present in 16 (19.5%) of the 82 allografts with mesangial IgA deposition. The grade of hematuria in IgA(+) donors was significantly higher than IgA(-) donors (1.30 +/- 1.17 vs. 0.86 +/- 0.89, P = 0.025). Histologic investigation of IgA(+) allografts revealed the frequency of mesangioproliferative glomerulonephritis (PGN) was significantly higher in IgA(+)/C3(+) allografts (8/16, 50%) than in IgA(+)/C3(-) allografts (11/66, 16.7%) (P = 0.0084). Moreover, the number of infiltrated macrophages to glomerulus (cells/glomerular cross section) was significantly higher in the IgA(+)/C3(+) allografts than in IgA(+)/C3(-), IgA(-)/C3(+) and IgA(-)/C3(-) allografts (1.10 +/- 0.62 vs. 0.61 +/- 0.42, P = 0.0008; 0.47 +/- 0.34, P = 0.023; and 0.37 +/- 0.23, P = 0.002, respectively). CONCLUSION: The latent mesangial IgA deposition was a relatively common phenomenon in the healthy Japanese donors. This phenomenon was associated with mild degree of microhematuria, mesangial proliferation and glomerular macrophage infiltration in some of the affected individuals, especially with combined IgA and C3 deposition.     

Beneficial effects of the bioflavonoids curcumin and quercetin on early function in cadaveric renal transplantation: a randomized placebo controlled trial

BACKGROUND: The bioflavonoids quercetin and curcumin are renoprotective natural antioxidants. We wished to examine their effects on early graft function (EF). METHODS: Between September 2002 and August 2004, 43 dialysis dependent cadaveric kidney recipients were enrolled into a study using Oxy-Q which contains 480 mg of curcumin and 20 mg of quercetin, started after surgery and taken for 1 month. They were randomized into three groups: control (placebo), low dose (one capsule, one placebo) and high dose (two capsules). Delayed graft function (DGF) was defined as first week dialysis need and slow function (SGF) as Cr >2.5 mg/dl by day 10. Category variables were compared by chi squared and continuous variables by Kruskal-Wallis. RESULTS: There were four withdrawals: one by patient choice and three for urine leak. The control group had 2/14 patients with DGF vs. none in either treatment group. Incidence of EF was control 43%, low dose 71% and high dose 93% (P=0.013). Serum creatinine was significantly lower at 2 days (control 7.6+/-2.1, low 5.4+/-0.6, high 3.96+/-.35 P=0.0001) and 30 days (control 1.82+/-.16, low 1.65+/-.09, high 1.33 +/-.1, P=0.03). Acute rejection incidence within 6 months was control 14.3%, low dose 14.3% and high dose 0%. Tremor was detected in 13% of high dose patients vs. 46% of others. Urinary HO-1 was higher in bioflavonoid groups. CONCLUSION: Bioflavonoid therapy improved early graft function. Acute rejection and neurotoxicity were lowest in the high dose group. These bioflavonoids improve early outcomes in cadaveric renal transplantation, possibly through HO-1 induction.     

Use of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in de novo renal transplant recipients with high incidence of delayed graft function

Patients with delayed graft function (DGF) are at risk of increased incidence for acute rejection episodes (ARE). Mycophenolate mofetil or induction therapy has produced a reduction in ARE incidence. An open, prospective, 3-month trial was performed in a group of Argentinian renal transplant recipients. We recruited 46 patients, 71.7% men, aged 41.7 +/- 13.8 years; including 36 (78.3%) recipients of cadaveric donors (CD) who were aged 43.4 +/- 15.5 years with a cold ischemia time of 19.4 hours +/- 5.4 minutes, and 10 (27.7%) recipients of living donors (LD) aged 37.8 +/- 12.9 years. HLA mismatches >or= 3 were observed in 58.4% of CD and in 7% of LD. All patients received two doses of basiliximab (20 mg each, days 0 and 4), cyclosporine microemulsion (CsA-ME) monitored by the second-hour concentrations (C2), enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS; 720 mg twice a day, and steroids. A 58% incidence of DGF was observed. At the end of the third month the incidence of biopsy-proven ARE was 15%, with a median serum creatinine of was 1.54 +/- 0.42 mg/dL, including three grafts lost. Two patients died. No patient required EC-MPS dose discontinuation but 20% of patients required dose adjustments. The absence of discontinuations and the low incidence of dose adjustments of EC-MPS in this high-risk de novo population provided support of a suitable tolerability profile for this EC-MPS, and the possibility to impact efficacy results.     

Renal allograft outcomes in African American versus Caucasian transplant recipients in the tacrolimus era

METHODS: Between January 1995 and December 1999, 185 kidney transplants were performed with tacrolimus (TAC)-based immunosuppression including 120 African American (AA, 65%) and 65 Caucasian recipients (C, 35%). Mean follow-up was 34 months. The AA group was characterized by a higher incidence of renal disease due to hypertension (72% AA vs 37% C, P <.001), pretransplant dialysis (95% AA vs 82% C, P =.003), waiting time (1.9 years AA vs 1.1 years C, P =.02), cadaveric donation (88% AA vs 68% C, P =.01), HLA mismatching (mean 3.5 AA vs 2.4 C, P <.001), and delayed graft function (DGF; 50% AA vs 22% C, P =.001). RESULTS: The 5-year actuarial patient and graft survival rates were 96% AA versus 83% C (P = NS) and 83% AA versus 75% C, (P = NS), respectively. The incidence of acute rejection (21% AA vs 12% C, P = NS) and mean time to acute rejection (12 months AA vs 11 months C) were similar. Although the incidence of chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) was comparable (7% AA vs 5% C), the mean time to CAN was shorter in AA recipients (18 months AA vs 37 months C, P =.03). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest marked improvement in post-transplant outcomes in the TAC era in patients with multiple immunologic risk factors including AA ethnicity, cadaveric donor source, DGF, and HLA mismatching.     

Addition of sirolimus to cyclosporine delays the recovery from delayed graft function but does not affect 1-year graft function

Delayed graft function (DGF) has long been identified as one of the main correlates of poor graft survival in cadaveric renal transplantation, but the factors that affect its onset and duration are not fully elucidated. The impact of two immunosuppressive protocols on the incidence and length of DGF among kidney transplant recipients of a suboptimal organ was evaluated. Patients were randomly treated with corticosteroids (CS); low-dose cyclosporine (CsA) and sirolimus (SRL; group 1; n = 42); or CS, full-dose CsA, and mycophenolate mofetil (group 2; n = 48). All recipients received immunoprophylaxis with basiliximab. After 3 mo, group 1 discontinued CsA and continued with SRL, whereas group 2 continued the same treatment. The incidence of DGF was similar in the two groups (group 1 = 52.4%; group 2 = 58.3%), whereas its duration was significantly higher in the group 1 (19.0 +/- 6.0 versus 10.3 +/- 3.2 d; P = 0.001). Both groups showed 100% actuarial graft and patient survival at 1-yr. Among DGF patients, serum creatinine (sCr) at discharge was significantly worse in group 1 (sCr, 3.0 +/- 1.0 versus 1.5 +/- 0.2 mg/dl; calculated creatinine clearance, 31.2 +/- 9.3 versus 61.1 +/- 10 ml/min; P = 0.001). During the first year, the former group displayed a significant improvement of graft function, such that at 1-yr, no difference could be measured between groups (sCr, 1.8 +/- 0.5 versus 1.7 +/- 0.4 mg/dl; calculated creatinine clearance, 51.5 +/- 10.2 versus 53.3 +/- 9.4 ml/min). In conclusion, in de novo renal transplanted patients, the administration of SRL, in combination with low-dose CsA, is associated with a delayed recovery from DGF but does not worsen 1-yr graft function.     

Non-heart-beating kidney transplantation: 6-year outcomes

Non-heart-beating donor kidneys (NHBD) are being used to increase the donor pool due to the scarcity of cadaveric heart beating donors (HBD). We evaluated the long-term outcomes of renal transplantation using NHBD kidneys, comparing the first 100 NHBD kidneys transplanted at our facility to the next consecutive cadaveric HBD kidneys for graft survival, recipient survival, and quality of graft function. Recipient survival (P = .22) and graft survival (P = .19) at 6 years did not differ between recipients of NHBD (83%, 80%) and HBD (89%, 87%) kidneys. Quality of graft function using the mean glomular filtration rates were significantly lower in the NHBD group up to 3 months following discharge (41 +/- 2 vs 47 +/- 2, P = .007) but were then comparable up to 6 years following transplantation (43 +/- 5 vs 46 +/- 4, P = .55).     

Outcome of transplantation using kidneys from controlled (Maastricht category 3) non-heart-beating donors

BACKGROUND: Many renal transplant centres are reluctant to use kidneys from non-heart-beating (NHB) donors because of the high incidence of primary non-function and delayed graft function reported in the literature. Here, we report our favourable experience of using kidneys from Maastricht category 3 donors (controlled NHB donors). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 1996 to June 2002, 42 renal transplants using kidneys from 25 controlled NHB donors were undertaken at our centre. The rates of primary non-function, delayed graft function (DGF), rejection and long-term graft and patient survival were compared with those of 84 recipients of grafts from heart-beating (HB donors) transplanted contemporaneously. RESULTS: Primary non-function did not occur in recipients of grafts from NHB donors but was seen in two grafts from HB donors. DGF occurred in 21 of 42 (50%) kidneys from NHB donors and 14 of 84 (17%) kidneys from HBD donars (p < 0.001). The acute rejection rates in the two groups were similar (33% for grafts from NHB donors vs. 40% from HB donors). By 1 month after transplantation, there was no significant difference in serum creatinine concentration between the two groups. Over a median follow-up period of 32 months (range 2-75 months), the actuarial graft survival rates at 1, 3 and 5 yr after transplantation were 84, 80 and 74% for recipients of kidneys from NHB donors, compared with 89, 85 and 80% for kidneys from HB donors. CONCLUSION: Controlled NHB donors are a valuable and under-used source of kidneys for renal transplantation. The outcome for recipients of kidney allografts from category 3 NHB donors is similar to that seen in recipients of grafts from conventional HB cadaveric donors.     

Review of clinical outcomes in nocturnal haemodialysis patients after renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Nocturnal haemodialysis (NHD) is a novel form of haemodialysis therapy that is associated with improved blood pressure control when compared to conventional haemodialysis (CHD). Current studies suggest that NHD lowers blood pressure through a decrease in peripheral resistance. The graft and blood pressure outcomes of NHD patients who undergo renal transplantation are unknown. METHODS: We reviewed the renal allograft and blood pressure outcomes of 15 NHD patients who underwent renal transplantation. An age and vintage matched cohort of 29 CHD patients was used as controls. RESULTS: The rate of delayed graft function (DGF) tended to be higher in the NHD group compared to the CHD group (64 vs 41%, P = 0.15), however the 1-year graft function (53+/-6 vs 59+/-5 ml/min, P = 0.426) and graft survival (92 vs 95%, P = 0.751) were similar. Intra-operatively, NHD patients had lower minimum systolic (92+/-5 vs 109+/-4, P = 0.03) and diastolic (48+/-3 vs 64+/-2, P = 0.02) blood pressures in comparison to the CHD cohort. Pathologically, acute tubular necrosis accounted for 100% of DGF in the NHD group in contrast to 75% in the CHD population (P = 0.01). Pre-transplant mean systolic BP (sBP) was significantly lower in the NHD group compared to the CHD group (113+/-6 vs 145+/-10 mmHg, P<0.001). At 12 months post-transplant, mean sBP increased from baseline in the NHD group ( triangle up sBP 22+/-7 mmHg, P = 0.009) while in the CHD group mean sBP fell (Delta sBP -14+/-5 mmHg, P = 0.014). Mean arterial and diastolic BP exhibited similar changes. These trends persisted after 24 months of post-transplant follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: One-year graft outcomes and blood pressures are similar for NHD and CHD patients who undergo renal transplantation. Unlike CHD patients, NHD patients experienced a significant fall in their intra-operative blood pressures, which likely contributed towards the delayed graft function in this cohort of patients. Further prospective studies are needed to examine the underlying differences in haemodynamics and long-term graft survival between the two renal replacement modalities.     

Erythropoietin treatment in the sixth posttransplant month as a prognostic factor for renal allograft survival

The purpose of this work was to assess the prognostic value of the need for erythropoietin (EPO) treatment at 6 months after transplantation. We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of 143 consecutive cadaveric kidney transplants performed between January 2000 and April 2004, functioning at 6 months postransplantation. Patients were divided into two groups: group EPO6m (n = 24) received EPO treatment in the sixth month, and a control group (n = 119) did not receive EPO. Renal function deterioration (RFD) was considered to be a sustained decrease in creatinine clearance (CrCl) greater than 20% between the sixth month postransplant and the last visit. Mean follow-up was 38 +/- 16 months. The mean ages of the donor (57 +/- 9 vs 49 +/- 12 years; P = .001) and the recipient (59 +/- 12 vs 47 +/- 17 years; P = .000) were greater in the EPO6m group. Delayed graft function (83% vs 48%; P = .001) was more frequent in the EPO6m group. At 6 months after transplantation the EPO6m group showed lower hemoglobin (11.52 +/- 1.71 vs 13.32 +/- 1.69 g/dL; P = .000), higher serum creatinine (2.31 +/- 0.72 vs 1.65 +/- 0.53 mg/dL; P = .000), lower CrCl (33.53 +/- 10.83 vs 53.6 +/- 17.58 mL/min; P = .000), and similar proteinuria. RFD was more common in the EPO6m group (38% vs 10%; P = .026), with a different pattern of evolution of CrCl (-0.098 +/- 0.176 vs +0.093 +/- 0.396 mL/min/mo, P = .000). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that treatment with EPO at 6 months was the only predictor of RFD (RR 4.46; 1.58 to 12.58; P = .005). The need for EPO at 6 months postransplant was a good predictor of later renal allograft deterioration, more sensitive than serum creatinine or proteinuria.     

Impact of Rh(D) blood group system on graft function and survival in live-donor kidney transplantation: a single-institution experience

One thousand five hundred consecutive live-donor renal transplants were performed in a single institution. Among these patients, 1,372 patients (group I) received Rh-identical allografts and 128 (group II) received Rh-nonidentical allografts. The two groups were homogenous apart from the prevalence of the Rh nonidentity among unrelated donor-recipient pairs. The rate of acute and chronic rejection was comparable in both groups (P = 0.33 for acute rejection and P = 0.66 for chronic rejection). The mean serum creatinine at 5 years was 1.8 +/- 1 mg/dL for group I and 1.7 +/- 0.9 mg/dL for group II (P = 0.5). The 1-, 5-, and 10-year graft survival rates were 94%, 78%, and 54% for group I and 95%, 82%, and 57% for group II. We found that the Rh(D) blood group system is not likely to be a clinically relevant histocompatibility barrier to live-donor renal transplantation.     

Impact of hepatitis C virus infection on patient and graft survival in kidney transplantation

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is the main cause of chronic liver disease after renal transplantation, which represents a risk factor for graft loss and patient death. Hepatitis C (+) kidney transplant candidates who remain on the waiting list show a greater risk of mortality than those who are transplanted, a risk that escalates with time. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of HCV infection on patient and allograft survival in our transplant population. Among 90 renal transplant patients transplanted between 1991 and 2002 who were retrospectively analyzed, 45 were HCV-positive and 45 HCV-negative by serology. All positive patients had shown positive HCV antibody and/or positive HCV RNA. The mean ages of the patients were 36.2 +/- 9 years among the HCV (+) and 38 +/- 10 years among the HCV (-) patients (P = .31). Eighteen HCV (+) patients and 14 HCV (-) patients received their grafts from deceased donors. The immunosuppressive protocols were similar in both groups. The number of acute rejection episodes were 13 (30%) in HCV (+) and 6 (13%) in the HCV (-) group (P = .006). Diabetes mellitus developed in 10 (23%) HCV (+) and 7 (16%) HCV (-) patients (P = .04). Cytomegalovirus disease occurred in 5 (16%) HCV (+) and 2 (6%) HCV (-) patients (P = .32). The mean serum creatinine was 1.85 +/- 1.1 mg/dL in HCV (+) and 1.8 +/- 1 mg/dL in HCV (-) group (P = .82). The mean graft survivals were 97.1 +/- 52 months in the HCV (+) and 81.1 +/- 37 months in the HCV (-) group (P = .04). Seven HCV (+) patients (16%) and three HCV (-) patients (6%) lost their grafts (P = .04). Advanced cirrhosis developed in three HCV (+) patients (6%). One patient died in the HCV (+) group. Patient survivals were 98% in the HCV (+) and 100% in the HCV (-) cohorts. In this study, the rate of graft loss was higher in HCV (+) patients, whereas the patient survival was similar.