Reactions of heavier lanthanides with hydrazine in the presence of sulphur dioxide

Hydrazine hydrate reacts with sulphur dioxide in aqueous solution in the presence of heavier lanthanide(III) ions to give variety of complexes. The nature of product formed is highly pH dependent. Several hydrazine complexes of Ln(III) ions of the compositions Ln(N₂H₃SOO)₃(H₂O), Ln₂(SO₃)₃·2N₂H₄ and N₂H₅Ln(SO₃)₂(H₂O)₂ where Ln = Eu, Gd, Tb or Dy and the precursors for the hydrazinium lanthanide sulphite hydrates, the anhydrous lanthanide hydrazinecarboxylates, Ln(N₂H₃COO)₃ where Ln = Eu, Gd, Tb or Dy have been prepared and characterized by analytical, spectral, thermal and X-ray powder diffraction techniques. The infrared spectral data are in favour of the coordination of hydrazine and water molecules. These complexes decompose in three stages to yield respective oxides as final residue. The final residues were confirmed by their X-ray powder diffraction patterns and TG mass losses. The SEM photographs of some of the oxides show a lot of cracks indicating that large quantity of gases evolved during decomposition.     

Structural and spectroscopy studies of complexes of the uranyl ion with 2,2′-bipyridine-N,N′-dioxide

2,2′-Bipyridine-N,N′-dioxide (bypO₂ = L) complexes of the composition [UO₂(bypO₂)₂(NO₃)₂]·2H₂O (UO₂–L₂–NO₃), [UO₂(bypO₂)₂H₂O](ClO₄)₂ (UO₂–L₂–ClO₄) and [UO₂bypO₂(H₂O)₂SO₄] (UO₂–L–SO₄) have been prepared by the reactions of the respective hydrated uranyl salts with the bypO₂ ligand in water. The structures of the complexes were elucidated using elemental and thermal analyses, IR and luminescence spectroscopy as well as luminescence lifetime measurements. The IR spectra show that the bonding between uranium and bypO₂, as well as uranium and water or a counter ion (NO₃⁻ and SO₄²⁻) is formed. The nitrate or sulfate groups coordinate to the central metal ions in a monodentate manner. From TG–DTA curves, the nature of the water molecules present in the complexes and the decomposition temperature of the dehydrated uranyl complexes were determined. The thermal stability of the anhydrous uranyl complexes increases in the series: (UO₂–L₂–NO₃) < (UO₂–L₂–ClO₄) < (UO₂–L–SO₄). All the compounds show green-yellow intense luminescence. The main fluorescence bands and the emission lifetimes in these complexes were determined. The luminescence spectra of all the prepared complexes differ from each other with respect to their peak maxima positions. The luminescence lifetimes also vary. The structure of the (UO₂–L–SO₄) complex was determined by X-ray single-crystal analysis.     

“Forced” coordination modes of 1,2-cyclohexanedione dioxime in uranyl complexes

Unusual coordination modes of 1,2-cyclohexane dionedioxime in uranyl complexes, i.e., tridentate chelating/bridging and (E, Z)-pentadentate chelating/bridging ones, were established by X-ray crystallography of single crystals of (CN₃H₆)₃[(UO₂)₂(C₆H₉N₂O₂)(C₆H₈N₂O₂)(C₂O₄)₂] · 2H₂O and [(UO₂)₂(C₆H₈N₂O₂)₂(H₂O)₃] · 2H₂O. The conditions of the emergence of such coordination modes were determined. The possibility of (E/Z) izomerization of α-dioximes in reactions of uranyl complexes.     

Preparation and Crystal Structure of a New Uranyl Sulfate Templated by a Bis-isothiouronium Cation

Crystals of a new uranyl sulfate (C₂N₄H₈S₂)[UO₂(SO₄)₂] · 0.3H₂O ( 1 ) templated by a relatively rare bis-isothiouronium cation, were formed upon evaporation of aqueous solutions containing uranyl acetate, thiourea, and excess sulfuric acid. The new compound is orthorhombic, P2₁2₁2₁, a = 6.928(2) Å, b = 13.398(3) Å, c = 15.225(3) Å, Z = 2. Its crystal structure is comprised of [UO₂(SO₄)₂] moieties linked by hydrogen bonds formed between the template cations and terminal oxygen atoms of the sulfate tetrahedra. The C₂N₄H₈S₂²⁺ template is most likely formed in situ during a redox reaction between uranyl cation and thiourea in a strongly acidic medium, with UO₂²⁺ partially reduced to U⁴⁺.     

2,2′‐Bipyrimidine as Efficient Sensitizer of the Solid‐State Luminescence of Lanthanide and Uranyl Ions from Visible to Near‐Infrared

Treatment of Ln(NO₃)₃?nH₂O with 1 or 2 equiv 2,2′‐bipyrimidine (BPM) in dry THF readily afforded the monometallic complexes [Ln(NO₃)₃(bpm)₂] (Ln=Eu, Gd, Dy, Tm) or [Ln(NO₃)₃(bpm)₂]?THF (Ln=Eu, Tb, Er, Yb) after recrystallization from MeOH or THF, respectively. Reactions with nitrate salts of the larger lanthanide ions (Ln=Ce, Nd, Sm) yielded one of two distinct monometallic complexes, depending on the recrystallization solvent: [Ln(NO₃)₃(bpm)₂]?THF (Ln=Nd, Sm) from THF, or [Ln(NO₃)₃(bpm)(MeOH)₂]?MeOH (Ln=Ce, Nd, Sm) from MeOH. Treatment of UO₂(NO₃)₂?6H₂O with 1 equiv BPM in THF afforded the monoadduct [UO₂(NO₃)₂(bpm)] after recrystallization from MeOH. The complexes were characterized by their crystal structure. Solid‐state luminescence measurements on these monometallic complexes showed that BPM is an efficient sensitizer of the luminescence of both the lanthanide and the uranyl ions emitting visible light, as well as of the Yb^III ion emitting in the near‐IR. For Tb, Dy, Eu, and Yb complexes, energy transfer was quite efficient, resulting in quantum yields of 80.0, 5.1, 70.0, and 0.8 %, respectively. All these complexes in the solid state were stable in air.     

Mixed ligand acetate,propionate, and pivalate complexes of rare earth metals with monoethanolamine: A new approach to the synthesis,composition, structure,and use for the preparation of oxide materials

Compositions of mixed ligand acetate, propionate, and pivalate complexes of rare earth metals of the cerium and yttrium groups with monoethanolamine are predetermined by the synthesis conditions and the nature of the carboxylate ligand and rare earth metal ion. Solid mixed ligand complexes [Ln(Piv)₅(MEAH)][MEAH] and [Ln(Piv)₃(MEA)], homoligand complexes [Ln(Piv)₃] (HPiv is 2,2-dimethylpropionic (pivalic) acid), and gel-like hydroxo complexes [Ln(Carb)_3–x–y (NO₃) _x -(OH) _y (MEA) _w (H₂O) _z ] (HCarb is acetic (HAc) or propionic (HProp) acid) are isolated using original synthesis procedures involving ion pairs [MEAH]⁺[Carb]^– (MEA is monoethanolamine). The compounds are studied by IR spectroscopy, ¹H NMR spectroscopy, elemental and thermal analyses, and mass spectrometry. Specific features for the complex formation of rare earth metal pivalates with MEA are additionally studied using quantum-chemical simulation.     

Two 2D uranyl coordination complexes showing effective photocatalytic degradation of Rhodamine B and mechanism study

Two new hydrostable two-dimensional(2 D) uranyl coordination complexes [(UO_2)_5(μ_3-O)_2(nbca)_2].7 H_2O(1) and [(UO_2)_3(nbca)_2(H_2O)_3]·2 H_2O(2)(H_3 nbca=5-nitro-1,2,3-benzenetricarboxylic acid) were hydrothermal synthesized.Single-crystal structural refinements reveal that both of the two complexes were formed by the packing of 2D uranyl coordination sheets via the hydrogen bonds.The nbca ligand coordinating to the uranyl polyhedron centers constructed the 2D sheets.There are UO_8 hexagonal bipyramids and UO_7 pentagonal bipyramids in 1 while only U07 pentagonal bipyramids in 2.Photocatalytic degradation of rhodamine B(RhB) in aqueous solution was studied.Complex 2 possesses better performance than 1 with 96.2 % of the RhB was degraded in only 60 min.Mechanism studies reveal that the dissolved oxygens are essential to the RhB degradation.The photocurrent density of 2 is more stable than that of 1,which indicating the stronger ability to separate photoexcited electrons and hole pairs of 2.     

Synthesis, spectroscopic and structural properties of uranyl complexes based on bipyridine N-oxide ligands

By using 2,2′-bipyridine N-oxide (bipyO) and 2,2′-bipyridine N,N′-dioxide (bipyO₂), three new uranyl complexes [UO₂(bipyO)SO₄]·H₂O (1), [UO₂(bipyO)(OH)(NO₃)]₂·H₂O (2) and [UO₂(bipyO₂)H₂O](ClO₄)₂·(3) were synthesized using uranyl salts including non-coordinating or weakly coordinating power of the ClO₄⁻ anion and the strongly coordinating power of NO₃⁻ and SO₄²⁻ anions. All of the compounds were characterized by CHN microanalytical procedures, infrared and luminescence spectroscopy and by single crystal X-ray diffraction. Spectroscopic studies indicate that the bipyO is bound to the uranyl group via the nitrogen and oxygen atoms. Structural analyses revealed that overall bonding pattern is different in each case: 1 is a polymer; in 2 dimeric complex molecules are formed, whereas 3 is composed of monomers. In all of the complexes, the uranium atom is in a seven-coordinate environment.     

The cation influence on substitution reactions in aqua dioxalate uranyl complexes

The cation influence on substitution reactions in aqua dioxalate uranyl complexes with the participation of a fluoride ion as an attacking ligand and two-charge cations of ethylene diammonium and propylene diammonium was considered. The structure of (C₂H₁₀N₂)₃[UO₂(C₂O₄)₂F]₂ · 6H₂O and (C₃H₁₂N₂)[UO₂(C₂O₄)₂(H₂O)] complexes was determined by X-ray crystallography.     

Uranyl aquahydroxylaminate complexes

Uranylaqua complexes with N-methyl-, N-ethyl-, N-isopropyl-, and N,N-dimethylhydroxylamines were studied. The structure of [UO₂{(CH₃)₂NO}₂(H₂O)₂] was determined by X-ray crystallography. The N, N -dimethylhydroxylaminate ion is coordinated to uranyl through the nitrogen and oxygen atoms with the formation of a three-membered chelate ring.     

Uranyl(VI) complexes of [O,N,O,N′]-type diaminobis(phenolate) ligands: Syntheses,structures and extraction studies

The syntheses and crystal structures of four new uranyl complexes with [O,N,O,N′]-type ligands are described. The reaction between uranyl nitrate hexahydrate and the phenolic ligand [(N,N-bis(2-hydroxy-3,5-dimethylbenzyl)-N′,N′-dimethylethylenediamine)], H₂L1 in a 1:2 molar ratio (M to L), yields a uranyl complex with the formula [UO₂(HL1)(NO₃)] · CH₃CN (1). In the presence of a base (triethylamine, one mole per ligand mole) with the same molar ratio, the uranyl complex [UO₂(HL1)₂] (2) is formed. The reaction between uranyl nitrate hexahydrate and the ligand [(N,N-bis(2-hydroxy-3,5-di-t-butylbenzyl)-N′,N′-dimethylethylenediamine)], H₂L2, yields a uranyl complex with the formula [UO₂(HL2)(NO₃)] · 2CH₃CN (3) and the ligand [N-(2-pyridylmethyl)-N,N-bis(2-hydroxy-3,5-dimethylbenzyl)amine], H₂L3, in the presence of a base yields a uranyl complex with the formula [UO₂(HL3)₂] · 2CH₃CN (4). The molecular structures of 1–4 were verified by X-ray crystallography. The complexes 1–4 are zwitter ions with a neutral net charge. Compounds 1 and 3 are rare neutral mononuclear [UO₂(HLn)(NO₃)] complexes with the nitrate bonded in η²-fashion to the uranyl ion. Furthermore, the ability of the ligands H₂L1–H₂L4 to extract the uranyl ion from water to dichloromethane, and the selectivity of extraction with ligands H₂L1, H₃L5 (N,N-bis(2-hydroxy-3,5-dimethylbenzyl)-3-amino-1-propanol), H₂L6 · HCl (N,N-bis(2-hydroxy-5-tert-butyl-3-methylbenzyl)-1-aminobutane · HCl) and H₃L7 · HCl (N,N-bis(2-hydroxy-5-tert-butyl-3-methylbenzyl)-6-amino-1-hexanol · HCl) under varied chemical conditions were studied. As a result, the most efficient and selective ligand for uranyl ion extraction proved to be H₃L7 · HCl.     

Molecular and polymeric uranyl and thorium hybrid materials featuring methyl substituted pyrazole dicarboxylates and heterocyclic 1,3-diketones

A series of seven novel f-element bearing hybrid materials have been prepared from either methyl substituted 3,4 and 4,5-pyrazoledicarboxylic acids, or heterocyclic 1,3- diketonate ligands using hydrothermal conditions. Compounds 1, [UO₂(C₆H₄N₂O₄)₂(H₂O)], and 3, [Th(C₆H₄N₂O₄)₄(H₂O)₅]·H₂O feature 1-Methyl-1H-pyrazole-3,4-dicarboxylate ligands (SVI-COOH 3,4), whereas 2, [UO₂(C₆H₄N₂O₄)₂(H₂O)], and 4, [Th(C₆H₅N₂O₄)(OH)(H₂O)₆]₂·2(C₆H₅N₂O₄)·3H₂O feature 1-Methyl-1H-pyrazole-4,5-dicarboxylate moieties (SVI-COOH 4,5). Compounds 5, [UO₂(C₁₃H₁₅N₄O₂)₂(H₂O)]·2H₂O and 6, [UO₂(C₁₁H₁₁N₄O₂)₂(H₂O)]·4.5H₂O feature 1,3-bis(4-N¹-methyl-pyrazolyl)propane-1,3-dione and 1,3-bis(4-N¹,3-dimethyl-pyrazolyl)propane-1,3-dione respectively, whereas the heterometallic 7, [UO₂(C₁₁H₁₁N₄O₂)₂(CuCl₂)(H₂O)]·2H₂O is formed by using 6 as a metalloligand starting material. Single crystal X-ray diffraction indicates that all coordination to either [UO₂]²⁺ or Th(IV) metal centers is through O-donation as anticipated. Room temperature, solid-state luminescence studies indicate characteristic uranyl emissive behavior for 1 and 2, whereas those for 5 and 6 are weak and poorly resolved.     

Reticular Chemistry of Uranyl Phosphonates: Sterically Hindered Phosphonate Ligand Method is Significant for Constructing Zero-Dimensional Secondary Building Units

Designability is an attractive feature for metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) and essential for reticular chemistry, and many ideas are significantly useful in the carboxylate system. Bi-, tri-, and tetra-topic phosphonate ligands are used to achieve framework structures. However, an efficient method for designing phosphonate MOFs is still on the way, especially for uranyl phosphonates, owing to the complicated coordination modes of the phosphonate group. Uranyl phosphonates prefer layer or pillar-layered structures as the topology extension for uranyl units occurs in the plane perpendicular to the linear uranium-oxo bonds and phosphonate ligands favor the formation of compact structures. Therefore, an approach that can construct three-dimensional (3D) uranyl phosphonate MOFs is desired. In this paper, a sterically hindered phosphonate ligand method (SHPL) is described and is successfully used to achieve 3D framework structures of uranyl phosphonates. Four MOF compounds ([AMIM]₂(UO₂)(TppmH₄) ⋅ H₂O ( UPF-101 ), [BMMIM]₂(UO₂)₃(TppmH₄)₂ ⋅ H₂O ( UPF-102 ), [Py14]₂(UO₂)₃(TppmH₄)₂ ⋅ 3 H₂O ( UPF-103 ), and [BMIM](UO₂)₃(TppmH₃)F₂ ⋅ 2 H₂O ( UPF-104 ); [AMIM]=1-allyl-3-methylimidazolium, [BMMIM]=1-butyl-2,3-dimethylimidazolium, [Py14]=N-butyl-N-methylpyrrolidinium, and [BMIM]=1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium) are obtained by ionothermal synthesis, with zero-dimensional nodes of uranyl phosphonates linked by steric tetra-topic ligands, namely tetrakis[4-(dihyroxyphosphoryl)phenyl]methane (TppmH₈), to give 3D framework structures. Characterization by PXRD, UV/Vis, IR, Raman spectroscopy, and thermogravimetry (TG) were also performed.     

Uranyl α-dioximates with neutral ligands

The interaction of uranyl compounds with different α-dioximes has been studied. Uranyl complexes with glyoxime, methylglyoxime, dimethylglyoxime, and 1,2-cyclohexanedionedioxime have been synthesized. The X-ray diffraction study of single crystals of [UO₂(C₃H₅N₂O₂)₂{(NH₂)₂CO}₂], [UO₂(C₆H₉N₂O₂)₂(H₂O)₂] · H₂O, [UO₂(C₆H₉N₂O₂)₂(H₂O)₂] · 6H₂O, and [UO₂(C₆H₉N₂O₂)₂(H₂O)₂]₂(CH₃CONH₂)₂ · 6H₂O showed a bidentate cyclic coordination of α-dioximes to the central atom through only one oxime group     

NMR studies of uranyl benzenesulfonate solvation and phase diagram of uranyl benzenesulfonate-water-tributyl phosphate system

Uranyl hydration and solvation numbers of uranyl benzenesulfonate (BSU) aqueous-organic solutions have been determined by means of dynamic NMR spectroscopy technique. Three aqua-complexes have been found to exist in aqueous-acetone solution: [UO₂ (U₆H₅SO₃)₂·4H₂O] and [UO₂(C₆H₅SO₃)₂·(H₂O)_n] where n=1 or 2 and anions are bridging bidentate. Transition from [UO₂ (C₆H₅SO₃)₂·4H₂O] to the higher aqua complexes begins at P>40. There is a disolvate in the non-aqueous solution of BSU in tri-n-butyl phosphate (TBP). Composition of aqueous and organic phase of the BSU-water-TBP ternary system has been determined at room temperature, allowing to produce the phase diagram of the system. The binodale position is related to the anion amphiphilicity. The solvation number determined for BSU in the organic phases corresponds exactly to the low temperature data and allows to observe BSU dehydration and desolvation in the region of mutual dissolution of water and the organic phase, as well as TBP and the aqueous phase.     

Spectral and thermal studies on new hydrazinium metal sulfite dihydrates

Some new hydrazinium transition metal sulfite dihydrate complexes of the formula (N₂H₅)₂M(SO₃)₂(H₂O)₂ where M=Fe, Co, Ni, Cu and Zn have been prepared and characterized by hydrazine and metal analyses, magnetic studies, electronic and infrared spectra and thermal analysis. The magnetic studies coupled with electronic spectra of iron, cobalt, nickel and copper complexes indicate their high spin octahedral nature. However the zinc complex is diamagnetic and show only the charge transfer transition. The infrared spectra shows that both the hydrazinium ions are coordinated to the metal ions, the sulfite ions are present as bidentate ligand. The simultaneous TG-DTA of these complexes were investigated in air and nitrogen atmospheres. In air, cobalt, nickel and zinc complexes give respective metal sulfate as the final residue while iron and copper complexes give the mixture of respective metal oxide and sulfate as the decomposition product. In nitrogen atmosphere respective metal sulfites are formed as the end residue.     

Structural topology and dimensional reduction in uranyl oxysalts: eight novel phases in the methylamine–(UO2)(NO3)2–H2SeO4–H2O system

Single crystals of eight novel uranyl selenates, (CH₃NH₃)₂[(UO₂)(SeO₄)₂(H₂O)](H₂O) (I) and (CH₃NH₃)₂[(UO₂)(SeO₄)₂(H₂O)] (II), (CH₃NH₃)₂[(UO₂)₂(SeO₄)₃] (III) and (CH₃NH₃)(H₃O)[(UO₂)₂(SeO₄)₃(H₂O)](H₂O) (IV), (CH₃NH₃)₄[(UO₂)₃(SeO₄)₅](H₂O)₄ (V) and (CH₃NH₃)(H₅O₂)(H₃O)₂[(UO₂)₃(SeO₄)₅](H₂O)₄ (VI), (CH₃NH₃)₄(H₃O)₂[(UO₂)₅(SeO₄)₈(H₂O)](H₂O)₄ (VII), and (CH₃NH₃)_1.5(H₅O₂)_1.5(H₃O)₃[(UO₂)₅(SeO₄)₈(H₂O)](H₂SeO₄)_2.6(H₂O)₃ (VIII), have been prepared by isothermal evaporation from aqueous solutions and structurally characterized. The observed structural topologies of uranyl selenate units have been investigated using graph theory. The principle of dimensional reduction has been used for analysis of the uranyl oxysalts with general chemical formula A _n (UO₂) _p (TO₄) _q (H₂O) _r (A = monovalent cation, and T = S, Se, Cr, Mo), which allowed to construct three-component composition-structure diagram with separate dimensionality fields for different chemical compositions.     

Thermal and spectral properties of some anhydrous and hydrated rare earth hydrazinecarboxylates

The anhydrous rare earth hydrazinecarboxylates, Ln(N₂H₃COO)₃ where Ln=La, Ce, Pr, Nd or Sm and hydrated rare earth hydrazinecarboxylates, Ln(N₂H₃COO)₃(H₂O)₃ where Ln=La or Nd have been prepared and characterized by chemical analyses, infrared spectroscopy and thermal analyses (TG/DTA/DTG). The infrared spectra indicate that the hydrazinecarboxylate group in both the sets of complexes is coordinated in a bidentate (chelate) fashion with the N-N stretching frequency at 980-1000 cm^-1. The thermal analyses of all the complexes show multi-step decomposition. The final product in all the cases is invariably the respective metal oxide carbide, Ln₂O₂C₂, though there are some variations in the decomposition pattern. This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Ligand Mediated Morphology of the Two‐Dimensional Uranyl Aqua Sulfates [UO2(X)(SO4)(H2O)] [X = Cl– or (CH3)3NCH2COO]

Two uranyl aqua sulfate compounds: [(CH₃)₃NCH₂COOH] [UO₂(Cl)(SO₄)(H₂O)] ( 1 ) and UO₂((CH₃)₃NCH₂COO)(SO₄)(H₂O) ( 2 ) were synthesized and their crystal structures were determined. The morphology changes between the two‐dimensional anionic structural unit of 1 and the neutral structural unit of 2 are examined, and the impact of their terminally coordinating ligands discussed.     

Syntheses and structures of two new uranyl complexes [UO2(DPDPU)2(NO3)2](C6H5CH3) and [UO2(PMBP)2(DPDPU)](CH3C6H4CH3)0.5

Two new uranyl complexes [UO₂(DPDPU)₂(NO₃)₂](C₆H₅CH₃) (1) and [UO₂(PMBP)₂ (DPDPU)](CH₃C₆H₄CH₃)_0.5 (2), (DPDPU?=?N,N′-dipropyl-N,N′-diphenylurea, HPMBP?= 1-phenyl-3-methyl-4-benzoyl-pyrazolone-5) were synthesized and characterized. The coordination geometry of the uranyl atom in 1 is distorted hexagonal bipyramidal, coordinated by two oxygen atoms of two DPDPU molecules and four oxygen atoms of two bidentate nitrate groups. The coordination geometry of the uranyl atom in 2 is distorted pentagonal bipyramidal, coordinated by one oxygen atom of one DPDPU molecule and four oxygen atoms of two chelating PMBP molecules.