How patients with depressive symptoms view their condition: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND: Depressive symptoms are common in primary care, yet considerable professional controversy exists about appropriate management including the effectiveness of treatments. In addition, avoiding prescribing antidepressants at least initially is recommended. Views of patients themselves should therefore be particularly important in agreeing management strategies. OBJECTIVE: To examine lay beliefs about depressive symptoms in primary care. METHOD: A total of 23 semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients scoring positively for depression on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score in a primary care setting. RESULTS: Differentiating 'depression' from understandable reactions to adversity was difficult for patients. The wide range of consequences discussed included adverse effects on others, difficulties coping with feeling out of control and loss of self-identity. Negative images of depression, such as depression being a 20th century phenomenon, were pervasive. Views about medication varied. Various management strategies described included strategies of detachment, engagement in activities and 'blotting out' symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Patients' views about depressive symptoms are significantly different from conventional medical views. A 'disease management approach' fits uncomfortably with patients' experiences. Acknowledging feelings of loss of control and loss of self-identity in consultations may be useful. The wide employment of techniques patients use to control their disorders, such as support from others, engagement in activities and working at relationships, may be useful to encourage in consultations as alternatives to the use of antidepressant medication.     

Association between perceived health status and satisfaction with quality of care: evidence from users of primary health care in Oman

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to assess the influence of perceived health status, as measured by SF-12, on the client's views of service quality. METHODS: A structured interview of patients was carried out in six primary health care centres in Adh Dhahira region health authority in the Sultanate of Oman. A total of 1226 patients aged 15 and over attending the different health care services within the health centres took part in the study. The main outcome measures were patients' satisfaction with the different aspects of health care and their perceived physical and mental health status. RESULTS: When adjusted for the relevant background factors such as age and gender, poor perceived health status has been found to predict less positive judgements of various aspects of health care quality. Poor mental health status, for example, predicts less positive judgements of aspects that are linked to the accessibility of the service and interpersonal aspects of care such as the working hours of the centre, GP's attitude and time spent with the GP (P < 0.05, <0.05 and <0.01, respectively). Poor physical health status, on the other hand, predicts less positive judgements of aspects such as cleanliness of the building, confidentiality of consultation with the GP, explanation about the visit to the antenatal clinic and standard of antenatal clinic in general (P < 0.05, <0.05, <0.05 and <0.05, respectively). CONCLUSION: Users' perceived health status has to be evaluated concurrently with assessing satisfaction with the quality of health care services. This would provide more valid results with regard to the patients' views on their level of satisfaction with health care quality.     

Physical health care of patients with schizophrenia in primary care: a comparative study

BACKGROUND: Excess morbidity and mortality associated with schizophrenia is well established. Despite this, no previous multi-centre study has investigated whether patients with schizophrenia receive equitable physical healthcare within primary care. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia receive the same levels of physical health care from primary care practitioners as patients without schizophrenia. METHODS: Design: Case-matched retrospective case note review. Setting: Twenty-two general practices in the Birmingham area (UK). Subjects: 195 patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia, 390 matched controls with a diagnosis of asthma and 390 general control patients. Main outcome measures: Proportions of patients within each group having received six pre-defined routine health checks in a 3 year period. Conditional logistic regression models were used to identify differences between groups. RESULTS: Patients with schizophrenia were half as likely as asthma controls to have blood pressure and cholesterol levels recorded (odds ratio 0.51; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.35-0.73 and 0.50; 0.31-0.82, respectively) and were also less likely to have smoking status noted (0.60; 0.41-0.85). Similarly, patients with schizophrenia were significantly less likely than general population controls to have either blood pressure or cholesterol recorded (0.68; 0.47-0.97 and 0.58; 0.35-0.95). The significant differences observed were maintained after adjusting for potential confounders with the exception of cholesterol recording between the asthma and schizophrenia groups (0.57; 0.30-1.05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia are less likely to receive some important general health checks than patients without schizophrenia.     

The needs of children of depressed mothers in primary care

BACKGROUND: Maternal depression has a number of adverse effects on children. Although most depression is treated in primary care, assessment or support is rarely given to children of depressed mothers on a routine basis. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to examine the needs of children, aged 5-11 years, whose mothers are being treated for depression in primary care. METHODS: Mothers being prescribed antidepressants by their GP (n = 30) and mothers not being prescribed antidepressants (n = 30) were interviewed, and comparisons were made between their children (n = 48 and 50). RESULTS: The mothers who were prescribed antidepressants were more depressed than the other mothers, and their children had more dysfunctional symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The needs of children must be considered when depressed mothers are being treated in primary care.     

Understanding team-based quality improvement for depression in primary care

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impacts of the characteristics of quality improvement (QI) teams and their environments on team success in designing and implementing high quality, enduring depression care improvement programs in primary care (PC) practices. STUDY SETTING/DATA SOURCES: Two nonprofit managed care organizations sponsored five QI teams tasked with improving care for depression in large PC practices. Data on characteristics of the teams and their environments is from observer process notes, national expert ratings, administrative data, and interviews. STUDY DESIGN: Comparative formative evaluation of the quality and duration of implementation of the depression improvement programs developed by Central Teams (CTs) emphasizing expert design and Local Teams (LTs) emphasizing participatory local clinician design, and of the effects of additional team and environmental factors on each type of team. Both types of teams depended upon local clinicians for implementation. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The CT intervention program designs were more evidence-based than those of LTs. Expert team leadership, support from local practice management, and support from local mental health specialists strongly influenced the development of successful team programs. The CTs and LTs were equally successful when these conditions could be met, but CTs were more successful than LTs in less supportive environments. CONCLUSIONS: The LT approach to QI for depression requires high local support and expertise from primary care and mental health clinicians. The CT approach is more likely to succeed than the LT approach when local practice conditions are not optimal.     

Which GP deals better with depressed patients in primary care in Kastamonu, Turkey: the impacts of 'interest in psychiatry' and 'continuous medical education'

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the reasons behind Turkish GPs' limited ability to diagnose and treat major depression. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this preliminary study is to evaluate the impact of a GP's level of interest in psychiatry and participation in previous continuous medical education (CME) on their ability to recognize and treat major depression. METHODS: Thirty-eight GPs from an underdeveloped city in Turkey participated in the study. A survey consisting of questions about their demographic characteristics, self-reported capacity for recognition and antidepressant management of depression, presence of previous CMEs and self-ratings of their interest in psychiatry was given to all GPs. Comparisons were made using hierarchical multiple regression analyses and SPSS software. RESULTS: Almost half of the GPs had participated previously in at least one CME course on depression, and these were significantly more involved with the treatment of depressed patients (P = 0.02). Hierarchical multiple regression analysis indicated that 'interest in psychiatry' was an important factor in predicting the GPs' confidence in recognizing and treating depression even after controlling for other variables such as age, gender (P = 0.01) and participation in previous CME (P = 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that personal characteristics, including a GP's interest in psychiatry, should be considered when planning education and other interventions to improve the detection and treatment of depression in primary care.     

Anticoagulant treatment of patients with chronic atrial fibrillation in primary health care in Sweden--a retrospective study of incidence and quality in a registered population

BACKGROUND: The number of patients receiving anticoagulant treatment is increasing. Chronic atrial fibrillation is the most common treatment diagnosis. The literature indicates a variable level of treatment control. Estimates of time within the therapeutic range have been recommended as a measurement of quality. Electronic patient records are providing clinical data that are useful for audits concerning anticoagulant treatment in real-life practice. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to assess warfarin treatment for chronic atrial fibrillation in primary health care with regard to prevalence, incidence and quality. METHODS: A 2 year retrospective study was carried out of electronic patient records up to April 2002 in primary health care in Stockholm, including 12 primary health care centres with a registered population of 203 407. Main outcome measures were the number of new patients on wafarin treatment for chronic atrial fibrillation, and time within the therapeutic prothrombin range in the first 90 days of treatment using a linear interpolation method. RESULTS: In total, 827 patients were on warfarin treatment for chronic atrial fibrillation, giving a prevalence of 0.41%. Of these, 144 patients (study group) started treatment with warfarin for chronic atrial fibrillation during the study period, giving a yearly incidence of 0.07%. Their mean age was 73.1 years and 61.1% were men. There were 1721 prothrombin monitoring episodes registered in the first 90 days of treatment, on average once a week per patient. The average proportion of time within the therapeutic range was 54.1% (95% confidence interval (CI) 50.1-58.1), and the proportion of therapeutic tests was 50.2% (95% CI 47.8-52.6). CONCLUSIONS: During the first, second and third months of warfarin treatment for chronic atrial fibrillation, patients were outside the therapeutic range time nearly half the time. There was a gender difference favouring men regarding initiation of treatment.     

Medically unexplained symptoms: perceptions of physicians in primary health care

BACKGROUND: Patients presenting with multiple symptoms represent a substantial part of a GP's total work load. At the same time, these patients account for the majority of the people on long-term sick-leave in Sweden today. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore GPs' perceptions and ways of managing patients with medically unexplained symptoms (MUS). METHODS: Five focus group discussions were conducted with a total of 27 GPs. In the collection and analysis of data, a phenomenographic approach was used. RESULTS: The GPs described how they used four different approaches to manage patients with MUS: a biomedical, a psychological, an educational and a psychosocial approach. Different approaches were used, depending on the patient and the situation, and the GPs even switched approach when working with the same patient. CONCLUSIONS: In their work with patients with MUS, GPs need support and further training to improve the way the biomedical frame of reference is integrated with the humanistic perspective.     

The association between culture, climate and quality of care in primary health care teams

BACKGROUND: Culture and climate represent shared beliefs and values that may influence quality of care in health care teams, and which could be manipulated for quality improvement. However, there is a lack of agreement on the theoretical and empirical relationships between climate and culture, and their relative power as predictors of quality of care. This study sought to examine the association between self-report measures of climate and culture in primary care teams and comprehensive measures of quality of care. METHODS: The data were derived from a cross-sectional survey of 492 professionals in 42 general practices in England. Self-report measures of culture (the Competing Values Framework) and climate (the Team Climate Inventory) were used, together with validated measures of quality of care from medical records and self-report. RESULTS: The majority of practices could be characterized as 'clan' culture type. Practices with a dominant clan culture scored higher on climate for participation and teamwork. There were no associations between culture and quality of care, and only limited evidence of associations between climate and quality. CONCLUSIONS: The current analysis would not support the hypothesis that culture and climate are important predictors of quality of care in primary care. Although larger studies are required to provide a definitive test, the results may suggest the need for a more complex model of the associations between culture, climate and outcomes, and further research may be required into the interaction between culture and climate with other determinants of behaviour such as internal and external incentives.     

Health status and health care utilisation of patients in complementary and conventional primary care in Switzerland--an observational study

BACKGROUND: The study is part of a nationwide evaluation of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in primary care in Switzerland. OBJECTIVES: Patient health status with respect to demographic attributes such as gender, age, and health care utilisation pattern was studied and compared with conventional primary care. METHODS: The study was performed as a cross-sectional survey including 11932 adult patients seeking complementary or conventional primary care. Patients were asked to document their self-perceived health status by completing a questionnaire in the waiting room. Physicians were performing conventional medicine and/or various forms of complementary primary care such as homeopathy, anthroposophic medicine, neural therapy, herbal medicine, or traditional Chinese medicine. Additional information on patient demographics and yearly consultation rates for participating physicians was obtained from the data pool of all Swiss health insurers. These data were used to confirm the survey results. RESULTS: We observed considerable and significant differences in demographic attributes of patients seeking complementary and conventional care. Patients seeking complementary care documented longer lasting and more severe main health problems than patients in conventional care. The number of previous physician visits differed between patient groups, which indicates higher consumption of medical resources by CAM patients. CONCLUSIONS: The study supports the hypothesis of differences in socio-demographic and behavioural attributes of patients seeking conventional medicine or CAM in primary care. The study provides empirical evidence that CAM users are requiring more physician-based medical services in primary care than users of conventional medicine.     

Complementary and alternative medicine use in patients with chronic diseases in primary care is associated with perceived quality of care and cultural beliefs

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of our study was to determine the prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use and its clinical and psycho-social correlates, including perceived satisfaction with care and cultural health beliefs. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was carried out in public sector primary care clinics in Singapore using a random sample of 488 adult patients with chronic diseases. The measures were CAM use, satisfaction with care and traditional health beliefs. RESULTS: The 1 year prevalence of CAM use was 22.7%. In univariate analyses, factors associated with CAM use included: middle age, arthritis, musculoskeletal disorders and stroke, multiple conditions, poor perceived health, family use of CAM, recommendation by close social contacts, strong adherence to traditional health beliefs and perceived satisfaction with care. Patients who were dissatisfied/very dissatisfied with the cost of treatment [odds ratio (OR) = 1.79, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15-2.82] and waiting time (OR = 1.96, 95% CI 1.20-3.19) were more likely to use CAM. Patients who were very satisfied with the benefit from treatment were much less likely to use CAM (OR = 0.49, 95% CI 0.29-0.83). Satisfaction with doctor-patient interaction was not associated with CAM use. Being 'very satisfied' on overall care satisfaction was significantly associated with much less CAM use (OR = 0.30, 95% CI 0.14-0.68). Multivariate analyses confirmed that CAM use was significantly and independently predicted by the 'chronic disease triad' (arthritis/musculoskeletal disorders/stroke) (OR = 4.08, 95% CI 2.45-6.83), overall satisfaction with care (OR = 0.32, 95% CI 0.14-0.74) and strong adherence to traditional health beliefs (OR = 1.88, 95% CI 1.07-3.31). CONCLUSION: CAM use in Asian patients is prevalent and associated with the 'chronic disease triad' (of arthritis, musculoskeletal disorders and stroke), satisfaction with care and cultural beliefs. In particular, CAM use is not associated with the quality of doctor-patient interaction.     

Preconception care: practice and beliefs of primary care workers

BACKGROUND: A number of lifestyle modifications and medical interventions can be of benefit to maternal and neonatal health, when applied prior to conception. These include smoking cessation, supplementation with folic acid, cessation or moderation of alcohol intake and improvement of diabetic control. However, preconception care (PCC) is not widely practised in the UK, despite being apparently acceptable to health professionals and to women of childbearing age. OBJECTIVES: The aims of the study were to describe the current practice of PCC in Barnsley and to assess the beliefs and attitudes of primary health care practitioners. This information would help direct appropriate educational and clinical governance intervention to this service in the locality in the light of other evidence about the effectiveness of PCC. METHODS: A questionnaire was devised to explore the beliefs about, and practice in providing, PCC in primary care in the Barnsley Health Authority area and sent to all known GPs, practice nurses (PNs), health visitors (HVs) and midwives (MWs) in practices in the area in July 2000. A total of 163 completed questionnaires were received (one reminder, response rate 60.1%). RESULTS: Few practices had a written policy on PCC. Most respondents were providing it mainly on an opportunistic basis and had done so less than five times in the previous 3 months; GPs and PNs were most commonly involved. They agreed that advice about smoking, drug use, folic acid, genetic counselling, chronic disease, alcohol, and maternity care and screening for rubella, genital infections, hepatitis, human immunodeficiency virus and cervical cytology were important. They felt that advice about diet, exercise, supplements, food safety, occupational hazards and State benefits, and screening for nutritional status were less important. Although respondents felt that PCC was effective, and important to women of childbearing age, it was not a high priority in their workload. They indicated that this care was best provided in general practice and that they had the appropriate skills. Barriers to providing PCC included lack of resources and lack of contact with women planning to conceive. Few had received any training on PCC since qualifying in their discipline. CONCLUSIONS: The practitioners who responded to this survey agreed to a large extent about the importance of the subject, and about the content and effectiveness of PCC. Factors hindering the delivery of this service include resource constraints, lack of training and practice policies and procedures, and difficulty in targeting couples planning conception. Further research is needed into ways to increase the provision and uptake of PCC.     

Efficacy of self-help manuals for anxiety disorders in primary care: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to review effectiveness studies of self-help manuals for anxiety disorders in primary care. METHODS: A systematic review of six identified randomized controlled trials was carried out. In addition to outcome, the articles were coded on quality variables. RESULTS: The studies included differed with respect to the methodological quality, measurements used and size of the study population. Despite these differences, global results suggest that a self-help manual is an effective treatment possibility for primary care patients with anxiety disorders. The more time that was spent on guidance on the use of the self-help manual the greater was its effectiveness. CONCLUSION: Treatment with a self-help manual for anxiety disorders may be effective in primary care. Data are lacking on the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of these manuals.     

Systematic review: prognosis of angina in primary care

BACKGROUND: Angina is a common chronic condition, largely managed in primary care in the UK. Mortality data are predominately from population or hospital studies with little known about the prognosis of angina in general practice settings. OBJECTIVE: To describe the prognosis of angina in patients identified in primary care. METHODS DESIGN: Systematic review of cohort studies of angina in primary care. Data sources. Medline, PsycINFO, EMBASE, CINAHL, HMIC, WOS, IBSS, UK National Research Register, notification via JISC, CHAIN. REVIEW METHODS SELECTION CRITERIA: Cohort studies of patients with angina, with >12 months of follow-up, recruited within primary care. VALIDITY ASSESSMENT: Database searches and abstracts were reviewed independently by two authors. Papers were assessed according to criteria derived from the cohort methodological literature. DATA ABSTRACTION: Data were abstracted by two reviewers. DATA SYNTHESIS: Narrative summary. A quantitative synthesis was planned. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Total and cardiovascular death; non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI). RESULTS: Six studies fulfilled our selection criteria. The annual total mortality rate is 2.8-6.6%, an annual cardiovascular death rate of 1.4-6.5% and an annual non-fatal MI rate of 0.3-5.5%. A quantitative synthesis was not possible, because the studies were clinically heterogeneous. CONCLUSIONS: The primary studies have value in determining the prognosis of patients with angina recruited in general practice; however, the studies are old, have small numbers of events and are clinically heterogeneous. The contemporary prognosis of angina in primary care remains a key question, and further research is, therefore, required to estimate the prognosis of angina in this setting and its determinants.     

Structured career pathways in academic primary care

Research in primary care has much to offer researchers and ultimatelyefforts to improve population health and health care. Thereis a need for capacity building and efforts to improve the scienceof research in this field. This article outlines a relativelystructured career pathway for primary care researchers and offersadvice on opportunities and commonly encountered pitfalls. Itis largely based upon the authors’ experiences and personalreflections as medically trained researchers but many of theimplications and lessons are relevant to other clinical andresearch disciplines. Keywords. Career choice, interdisciplinary studies, primary health care, research, training.     

肝硬化患者焦虑抑郁情绪及生活质量的调查与干预

目的调查肝硬化患者焦虑、抑郁水平及社会支持与生活质量状况,找到干预患者情绪状况、改善生活质量的有效途径。方法运用基本问卷、躯体状态、医用焦虑抑郁量表、社会支持量表、诺丁汉健康量表对175例肝硬化患者问卷调查。结果 HADS-A均值≥9分的170例(97.7%),HADS-D均值≥9分的155例(89.1%),患者普遍存在焦虑抑郁情绪。3组不同年龄段患者在主观支持(P=0.005)、疼痛(P=0.012)、社交(P=0.040)、活动(P=0.012)、诺丁汉健康量表总分(P=0.024)方面存在显著差异,抑郁、客观支持、并发症和、主观支持对预测诺丁汉健康量表总分作用显著。结论肝硬化患者年龄、抑郁情绪、病情严重情况、社会支持对患者的生活质量影响明显,在进行心理干预时,可从抑郁情绪、社会支持入手,对不同年龄阶段的患者给予有针对性的团体心理干预,提高患者的生活质量。     

Medication and treatment use in primary care patients with chronic pain of predominantly neuropathic origin

BACKGROUND: Neuropathic pain is widely recognized as one of the most difficult pain syndromes to treat and presents a significant challenge for pain clinicians and GPs. METHODS: The Self-complete Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (S-LANSS) questionnaire, recently validated for identifying pain of predominantly neuropathic origin (POPNO), was sent to 6000 adults identified from general practices in the UK. The questionnaire also contained items about chronic pain identification, medications and treatments received for pain and the pain relief these provided. RESULTS: In total, 1420/3002 (48%) of respondents indicated that they suffered with any chronic pain. These were further categorized as those with chronic pain who were S-LANSS negative ['chronic pain (non-POPNO)' group, n = 1179] and those with chronic pain who were S-LANSS positive, indicating the presence of POPNO ('chronic POPNO' group, n = 241). Questions relating to treatments and medications were completed by 88% of the respondents (1244/1420). The chronic POPNO group was more likely to receive multiple pain medications (37% versus 21% took two or more pain medications, P < 0.001) and stronger painkillers [e.g. opioids odds ratio 1.94; 95% confidence interval 1.10, 3.42]. Despite this, they reported less effective pain relief than the non-POPNO chronic pain group. CONCLUSION: Patients in primary care reporting chronic pain were found generally to obtain incomplete relief from their medication with chronic POPNO patients reporting less relief. It is important that patients with any chronic pain are identified and managed appropriately according to their distinct treatment needs.     

Diagnosis of lung cancer in primary care: a structured review

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer has the highest cancer incidence and mortality in the UK. Despite this, an individual GP encounters only one new presentation approximately every 8 months, so gains relatively little experience of its diagnosis. This is partly addressed by referral guidelines which aim to help GPs in selection of patients for chest X-ray or referral for specialist investigation. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to review the primary care presenting features of lung cancer, in the light of the UK Referral Guidelines for Suspected Cancer. METHODS: A structured literature review was carried out. RESULTS: Little research has been undertaken in primary care, and the predictive values for most symptoms are unknown. Approximate likelihood ratios could be calculated for six symptoms or signs: haemoptysis 13; fatigue 5.7; cough 5.3; finger clubbing 3.9; weight loss 2.9; and dyspnoea 1.5-5.7, but none of these figures derived from single primary care studies. Three recommendations for urgent investigation of possible lung cancer in the UK Referral Guidelines are questioned: for unexplained dyspnoea, hoarseness or cervical lymphadenopathy. For all these presentations, other serious diagnoses are more likely. CONCLUSION: The UK Guidelines for referral of suspected lung cancer have a weak evidence base.     

Patients' experiences of medication for anxiety and depression: effects on working life

BACKGROUND: and objectives. The prevalence of depression and anxiety has increased in recent years, leading to extensive use of medication. This study used a qualitative, in-depth approach to investigate patients' experiences of taking medication prescribed for these conditions. Sampling from a range of occupational sectors, the research explored the impact of medication on working life. METHODS: The research involved nine focus groups with sufferers of anxiety and depression to investigate the personal experiences of mental ill-health and the impact of psychotropic drugs. A further three focus groups were conducted with staff in human resources, personnel, occupational health, and health and safety departments, to explore the organizational perspectives on psychotropic medication in the workplace. Focus groups were held at Loughborough University and at workplace settings throughout the UK. Results were presented to an expert panel (comprising practitioners and researchers in health care and occupational health) to consider implications for practice. RESULTS: Physical symptoms associated with anxiety and depression included: nausea, headaches, dizziness, trembling, insomnia and lack of energy. Psychological symptoms involved: poor concentration, emotional distress and lack of motivation. Non-compliance was widespread due to side effects, lack of improvement in symptoms or because medication made patients feel worse. Patients did not feel well informed about their medication. People took less than the prescribed amount or stopped taking the medication. Concerns about dependency caused patients to cease medication prematurely. CONCLUSION: Patients felt ill informed about their medication and would have welcomed more information. Drawing on the results, the authors outline areas for improvement in the care of patients with anxiety and depression.