结直肠癌同时性肝转移的同期手术切除

目的探讨同时性结直肠癌肝转移行同期切除原发瘤和肝转移瘤的安全性和有效性。方法回顾性总结分析从1981年5月至2005年11月在我院住院治疗的43例结直肠癌同时性肝转移同期手术的临床病理资料及结果并结合文献复习。结果43例患者中男性21例,女性22例,中位年龄52岁,手术持续中位时间180min。共30例术中输血,中位输血量800ml。术后总住院时间10—50d,中位时间15d。并发症发生率18．6％（8／43）,手术死亡率2．3％（1／43）。全组总的中位生存期为25个月,5年生存率19．1％。R0切除组的中位生存期48个月,5年生存率33．8％;非R0切除组的中位生存期为20个月,5年生存率7．6％。两组的生存时间经LogRank检验差异明显,P=0．002。结论同时性结直肠癌肝转移同期手术的安全性和有效性可以保证。对可切除的同时性结直肠癌肝转移应争取同期手术,并争取R0切除。     

同期肝切除治疗结直肠癌同时性肝转移

目的探讨结直肠癌同时性肝转移肝肠同期手术的疗效。方法回顾性分析1994年8月至2004年12月在我院行外科手术治疗的121例同时性结直肠癌肝转移患者的临床资料。结果在121例同时性结直肠癌肝转移患者中,99例行结直肠癌根治性切除术,剔除2例行原位肝移植患者后,同期肝切除组41例（A组）,对肝转移瘤行姑息外科治疗组56例（B组）,即转移瘤未能完全经手术切除者,A、B组患者性别、年龄、原发瘤部位、浸润深度、淋巴结转移等差异均无统计学意义,肝转移瘤数目（x^2=40.41,P＜0.05）、肝转移瘤分布（x^2=11.61,P＜0.05）差异有统计学意义;两组患者中位生存期分别为28.9个月、17.1个月,5年生存率分别为14％、0,其中A组患者中位无瘤生存期为19.5个月,1、3、5年生存率为93%、44%和14%。结论同期肝切除能为部分结直肠癌同时性肝转移患者提供治愈机会,对于合适的患者应力争行同期肝切除术。     

结直肠癌肺转移患者手术切除肺转移灶的疗效及预后分析

目的 探讨结直肠癌肺转移患者手术切除肺转移灶的疗效及影响术后生存的因素。方法回顾性分析35例结直肠癌肺转移行肺转移灶切除患者的临床资料。结果全组患者中位随访时间48．0个月。中位生存时间为36．0个月,5年生存率为33．0％。19例患者死于肿瘤进展：16例生存患者中,10例带瘤生存．6例无瘤生存。其中1例至今已无瘤生存164个月。单因素分析结果显示,无瘤间期（DFI）时间的长短对肺转移瘤切除术后的生存有影响（P=0．036）：而患者的性别、年龄、原发肿瘤部位、肺转移瘤大小和位置、手术方式、肺转移瘤手术前CEA水平及复发后再次行肺转移瘤切除均未见与其术后生存时间有关。结论对于部分选择性结直肠癌肺转移患者．手术是有潜在治愈可能的治疗方式。DFI可能与肺转移瘤切除术后生存相关。     

结直肠癌肝转移综合治疗预后因素分析（附317例报告）

目的 探讨影响结直肠癌肝转移以外科手术为主的综合治疗疗效的预后风险因素。方法 回顾性分析北京大学肿瘤医院肝胆胰外一科2005年1月至2015年1月行肝切除手术治疗317例结直肠癌肝转移病人的临床资料及术后随访情况。结果 全组病人1、3、5年总存活率分别为90.5%、54.5%、45.0%。中位生存期43个月。单因素分析结果显示性别、原发灶淋巴结转移、肝转移灶最大径、肝转移灶出现时间、癌胚抗原（CEA）水平及是否存在肝外转移灶是影响预后的因素（P<0.05）;多因素分析结果显示原发灶淋巴结转移、同时性肝转移和CEA>30 μg/L是影响预后的独立危险因素。结论 以外科手术为主的综合治疗可显著改善结直肠癌肝转移病人的长期生存,多种临床风险因素影响病人预后。     

结直肠癌同时性肝转移同期与分期手术切除疗效比较

目的：比较结直肠癌同时性肝转移患者原发灶和肝转移灶同期与分期切除的近期和远期结局。方法回顾性分析北京肿瘤医院肝胆胰外一科2003年1月至2011年12月间的64例结直肠癌合并同时性肝转移患者的临床及术后随访资料,其中行原发灶和肝转移灶同期切除者20例（同期切除组）,分期切除者44例（分期切除组）。结果同期切除组Clavien-Dindo 1、2和3级并发症发生率分别为10．0％（2/20）、15．0％（3/20）和15．0％（3/20）,分期切除组分别为13．6％（6/44）、13．6％（6/44）和22．7％（12/44）,差异无统计学意义（P＞0．05）。同期切除组1、2和3年总体生存率分别为85．0％、59．6％和37．2％,分期切除组分别为90．9％、68．2％和47．1％,差异亦无统计学意义（均P＞0．05）。两组中位无病生存时间分别为6月和7月,差异亦无统计学意义（P＞0．05）。多因素预后分析显示,原发灶淋巴结阳性（P=0．020）和肝切除术前CEA水平大于20μg/L（P=0.017）是影响患者总体生存的独立危险因素;复发后有机会接受根治性局部治疗联合化疗则是一项保护性因素（P=0.001）;而手术时机（同期或分期切除）与患者总体生存无关（P＞0．05）。结论对于结直肠癌同时性肝转移,选择同期或分期切除并不影响患者的术后并发症发生率和远期生存率。     

133例结直肠癌肝转移外科手术疗效评价

目的评价手术治疗结直肠癌肝转移的疗效。方法分析复旦大学附属中山医院2000年1月1日至2005年12月31日收治的470例结直肠癌肝转移患者的资料,评价手术治疗对其生存的影响。结果196例同时性肝转移患者中手术30例（15．3％）,274例异时性肝转移患者中手术103例（37．6％）。同时性肝转移组手术死亡率（3．3％）高于异时性肝转移组（1．9％）（P〈0．05）。以2006年6月31日为随访终点,随访率100％,手术患者中同时性肝转移组1、3、5年生存率和中位生存时间与异时性肝转移组相似（P〉0．05）,但术后复发率较高（36．7％比20．4％,P=0．030）。49例具有手术指征而未手术的患者其1、3、5年生存率明显低于手术患者（P=0．003）。同时性肝转移组中22例Ⅰ期手术切除原发灶和肝转移灶和8例Ⅱ期手术患者的1、2．3年生存率和中位生存时间相似（P〉0．05）。生存因素风险分析发现手术切缘达1cm（P=0．036）和复发后再次手术（P=0．041）是生存的保护性因素,而术后复发（P=0．023）是生存的危险因素。结论手术治疗是结直肠癌肝转移的首选治疗措施,可以明显改善患者的术后生存。     

结直肠癌伴不可切除的同时性肝转移的腹腔镜治疗

目的:探讨结直肠癌伴有同时性不可切除肝转移灶的腹腔镜治疗的可行性及临床应用价值。方法:回顾分析2011年6月至2012年12月31例结直肠癌伴不可切除的同时性肝转移患者的临床资料及随访结果。按原发灶手术切除方式分为两组,A组行开腹手术切除结直肠癌原发灶(n=18),B组行腹腔镜手术(n=13)。术后均采取mFOLFOX6方案化疗。对比分析两组患者手术时间、术中出血量、术后排气时间、术后住院时间、术后接受首次化疗时间及治疗效果。结果:31例均成功施行结直肠癌切除术,腹腔镜组无一例中转开腹及严重并发症发生。术后患者行mFOLFOX6方案化疗至少2个周期。经统计学分析发现,两组患者手术时间、治疗效果差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但腹腔镜组术中出血量明显减少(P<0.01),术后排气时间明显缩短(P<0.05),术后住院时间明显减少(P<0.05),术后接受首次化疗的时间明显缩短(P<0.05)。结论:对于不可切除的同时性结直肠癌肝转移患者,行腹腔镜原发肿瘤切除是安全、可行的;与开腹手术相比,腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠癌伴不可切除的同时性肝转移,在切除原发灶的手术中具有出血量少、创伤小、术后肠功能恢复快、住院时间明显缩短并促进术后早期化疗等优势。腹腔镜手术对原发肿瘤及转移灶的治疗效果与开腹手术无明显差别,具有良好的临床应用价值。     

结直肠癌肺转移外科手术疗效评价

目的 评价手术治疗对结直肠癌肺转移生存率的影响.方法 回顾分析2005年1月至2008年10月上海复旦大学中山医院收治的77例结直肠癌肺转移患者的临床资料,其中30例接受手术切除,分析手术治疗对患者生存率的影响.结果 本组同时性肺转移38例,行手术治疗2例,平均生存时间25个月;未行手术治疗36例,中位生存时间18个月,两者差异无统计学意义（P=0.33）.异时性肺转移39例,行手术治疗28例,未手术者11例,手术组患者1、3年生存率分别为93.3%和58.5%,中位生存时间为26.7个月;未手术组患者的1、3年生存率分别为38.8%和19.1%,中位生存时间8个月;两者比较,差异有统计学意义（P=0.004）.结论 手术治疗结直肠癌肺转移可以提高患者生存率.     

结肠癌同时性肝转移同期手术与分期手术的疗效比较

目的：对比结肠癌同时性肝转移行同期手术与分期手术切除转移灶的疗效。方法：回顾性分析36例结肠癌同时性肝转移患者的临床资料,其中16例行结肠癌根治术同时切除肝转移病灶（同期手术组）;20例先行结肠癌根治性切除、二期行肝转移病灶切除（分期手术组）。比较两组患者的1,3,5年生存率。结果：同期手术组患者1,3,5年生存率分别为87.5%,37.5%,18.8%,分期手术组患者1,3,5年生存率分别为65%,10.0%,0.0%。两组比较,1年生存率差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）,同期手术组3,5年生存率明显高于分期手术组（均P<0.05）。结论：结肠癌同时性肝转移行同期手术可延长患者生存时间。

     

结直肠癌同时性肝转移治疗46例分析

目的:探讨结直肠癌同时性肝转移的有效治疗方法。方法:对1996～2004年收治的46例结直肠癌同时性肝转移的临床资料和随访资料进行回顾性分析。根据治疗方法的不同分为3组:A组21例,为一期切除原发灶和肝转移灶并经肝动脉和门静脉置泵化疗者;B组15例,为单纯原发灶切除并经肝动脉和门静脉置泵化疗者;C组10例,为原发灶和肝转移灶均未能切除而仅行肝动脉和门静脉置泵化疗者。用KaplanMeier法对病人的生存时间作统计分析。结果:A、B、C3组术后中位生存期分别为38、20和13个月;各组之间术后生存时间的比较均有显著统计学差异(P<0.01)。结论:结直肠癌原发灶和肝转移灶一期手术切除并经肝动脉和门静脉置泵化疗的疗效最好;肝转移灶无法切除者能将原发灶切除并经肝动脉和门静脉置泵化疗也可取得较好的疗效;原发灶和肝转移灶未能切除而仅经肝动脉和门静脉置泵化疗的疗效相对较差。对结直肠癌同时性肝转移应采取以手术切除为主的综合措施进行积极治疗。     

Synchronous Resection of Colorectal Primary Cancer and Liver Metastases

Background Patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastases are thought to have a less favorable prognosis than those with colorectal cancer alone. Surgical treatment options are controversial, be it synchronous resection or staged resection. This study compared the clinical, perioperative, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) results of patients undergoing synchronous resection versus staged resection. Methods An observational cohort study of 103 patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastases was performed. All data were collected prospectively. Clinical, perioperative, DFS, and OS results of patients undergoing synchronous resection (group I, n = 73) and staged resection (group II, n = 30) were compared. Results More patients in group I had poorly differentiated colorectal cancer, bilobar liver metastases, more than three liver metastases, ≤4 cm liver metastases, and shorter hospital stays than patients in group II. There were no significant statistically differences in DFS and OS between the two groups. The median DFS of groups I and II were 28 and 26 months, respectively (p = 0.585). The median OS of groups I and II were 37 and 36 months, respectively (p = 0.900). Conclusions Synchronous resection achieved DFSs and OSs similar to those seen after staged resection while avoiding a second major operation.     

动脉微泵灌注奥沙利铂治疗结直肠癌术后肝转移

目的探讨动脉微泵灌注奥沙利铂方案TACE治疗结直肠癌术后肝转移的有效性、安全性及其影响因素。方法回顾性分析68例经病理证实且接受至少2个疗程的动脉微泵灌注奥沙利铂方案TACE治疗的结直肠癌术后肝转移患者的资料。以TACE前是否曾接受全身静脉化疗分为A组(未化疗)和B组(已化疗)。随访患者生存时间,按实体瘤的疗效评价标准评价客观疗效,对比两组的不良反应。对影响生存时间的可能因素进行Cox回归分析。结果 68例患者中位生存期(OS)为18个月,中位无进展生存时间(PFS)为10个月。经治疗后完全缓解16例,部分缓解26例,稳定21例,进展5例;治疗有效率(RR)为61.76%(42/68)。两组RR、OS、PFS差异均无统计学意义(P均0.05)。两组不良反应中程度≥Ⅰ级的发生率差异均无统计学意义(P均0.05)。最终进入Cox回归模型的变量为肿瘤分化程度(P=0.003,风险比=2.202)。结论动脉微泵灌注奥沙利铂方案TACE治疗结直肠癌术后肝转移疗效确切,具有较高的客观有效率。     

A Real-World,Population-Based Analysis of the Outcomes of Colorectal Cancer Patients with Isolated Synchronous Liver or Lung Metastases Treated with Metastasectomy

Objective

To assess the survival outcomes among a contemporary cohort of colorectal cancer patients with isolated synchronous liver or lung metastases treated with or without surgical resection of the metastases.

Methods

Surveillance, epidemiology and end results database has been accessed and cases with isolated liver or lung metastases diagnosed 2010–2015 have been accessed. Kaplan–Meier survival estimates were used to compare overall survival among patients who had or had not undergone metastasectomy. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was then used to assess the impact of metastasectomy on colorectal cancer-specific survival.

Results

A total of 16,372 patients with colorectal cancer with isolated liver or lung metastases (M1a disease) were included in the current analysis (including 14,832 patients with isolated liver metastases and 1540 patients with isolated lung metastases). Patients who had undergone surgical resection of liver metastases have better overall survival compared to patients who had not undergone surgical resection of liver metastases (median overall survival: 38.0 months vs. 13.0 months; P < 0.001). Likewise, patients who had undergone surgical resection of lung metastases have better overall survival compared to patients who had not undergone surgical resection of lung metastases (median overall survival: 45.0 months vs. 19.0 months; P < 0.001). In a multivariable Cox regression analysis and among patients with isolated liver metastases, surgery to the metastases was associated with a reduced hazard of death (hazard ratio (HR) 0.567; 95% CI 0.529–0.609; P < 0.001). Likewise, and among patients with isolated lung metastases, surgery to the metastases was associated with a reduced hazard of death (HR 0.482; 95% CI 0.349–0.665; P < 0.001).

Conclusion

In a contemporary cohort, metastasectomy seems to be associated with improvement in overall and cancer-specific survival among patients with isolated synchronous liver or lung metastases from colorectal cancer. Whether this survival difference is totally ascribed to the effect of metastasectomy or it is the fact that patients who were eligible for surgical resection have limited disease extent and better medical profile (thus, leading to better survival) is unclear from such a population-based study.

     

Comparison Between Local Ablative Therapy and Chemotherapy for Non-Resectable Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Prospective Study

Background There is a growing interest for the use of local ablative techniques in patients with non-resectable colorectal liver metastases. Evidence on the efficacy over systemic chemotherapy is, however, extremely weak. In this prospective study we aim to assess the additional benefits of local tumour ablation. Methods A consecutive series of 201 colorectal cancer patients, without extrahepatic disease, that underwent laparotomy for surgical treatment of liver metastases, were prospectively followed for survival and HRQoL. At laparotomy three groups were identified: patients in whom radical resection of metastases proved feasible, patients in whom resection was not feasible and received local ablative therapy, and patients in whom resection or local ablation was not feasible for technical reasons and who received systemic chemotherapy. Findings Patients in the chemotherapy and in local ablation group were comparable for all prognostic variables tested. For the local ablation group overall survival at 2 and 5 years was 56 and 27%, respectively (median 31 months, n = 45), for the chemotherapy group 51 and 15%, respectively (median 26 months, n = 39) (P = 0.252). After resection these figures were 83 and 51%, respectively (median 61 months, n = 117) (P < 0.001). The median DFS after local ablation was 9 months, HRQoL was restored within 3 months. Patients after local ablation gained far more QALY’s (317) than in the chemotherapy group (165) (P < 0.001). Interpretation Although overall survival did not reached statistical significance, the median DFS of 9 months suggests a beneficial effect of local tumour ablation for non-resectable colorectal liver metastases. Moreover, compared with systemic chemotherapy more QALY’s were gained after local ablative therapy. Paul F.M. Krabbe and Cornelis J.A. Punt equally contributed to this study.     

125I粒子植入术联合支气管动脉化疗栓塞治疗纵隔型肺癌和/或肿瘤纵隔淋巴结转移

目的 观察¹²⁵I粒子植入术联合经支气管动脉化疗栓塞(BACE)治疗纵隔型肺癌和/或肿瘤纵隔淋巴结转移的价值。方法 回顾性分析20例接受¹²⁵I粒子植入术联合BACE治疗的纵隔型肺癌和/或肿瘤纵隔淋巴结转移患者,观察术后肿瘤疗效反应、患者生存情况及生活质量等,评价联合治疗疗效。 结果 粒子植入术后患者均出现轻度不良反应,1例发生中度不良反应,未见重度不良反应。术后随访8~49个月,术后1个月卡诺夫斯基绩效状态量表(KPS)评分显著提高(P=0.019);术后6个月5例肿瘤完全缓解、9例部分缓解,4例疾病稳定,2例疾病进展,客观反应率为70.00%,局部控制率为90.00%;患者中位无进展生存期10.5个月,中位总生存期为20.5个月,总生存率45.00%。结论 ¹²⁵I粒子植入术联合BACE用于纵隔型肺癌和/或肿瘤纵隔淋巴结转移疗效和安全性均较好。     

Outcomes After Hepatic and Pulmonary Metastasectomies Compared With Pulmonary Metastasectomy Alone in Patients With Colorectal Cancer Metastasis to Liver and Lungs

Background

Surgical resection is the most effective treatment for colorectal cancer that has metastasized to the liver. Similarly, surgical resection improves survival for selected patients with pulmonary colorectal metastases. However, the indication for pulmonary metastasectomy is not clear in patients with both hepatic and pulmonary colorectal metastases. Therefore, we evaluated outcomes after pulmonary resection of colorectal metastases in patients with or without a history of curative hepatic metastasectomy.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 96 patients who underwent pulmonary metastasectomy from March 1999 to November 2009. Patients were grouped according to treatment: resection of pulmonary metastases alone (lung metastasectomy group) or resection of both hepatic and pulmonary metastases (liver and lung metastasectomy group). Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were evaluated by Kaplan–Meier analysis. Survival curves were compared using the log-rank test.

Results

The 5-year OS for all patients was 61.3 %, and the 5-year DFS was 26.7 %. Group comparisons showed that the 5-year OS of the lung metastasectomy group was significantly better than that of the liver and lung metastasectomy group (69 vs. 43 %; p = 0.030). However, the 5-year DFS rates of the lung metastasectomy group (25.8 %) and liver and lung metastasectomy group (28.0 %) did not differ significantly. Recurrence was higher after resection of both hepatic and pulmonary metastases than after pulmonary metastases alone (79 vs. 45 %; p = 0.025).

Conclusions

Resection of pulmonary colorectal metastases may increase survival. However, the combination of liver and lung metastasectomies had a worse prognosis than pulmonary metastasectomy alone. In selected patients, combined liver and lung metastasectomy can be beneficial and result in acceptable DFS.     

The volume-time index (VTI) is prognostic in patients with colorectal cancer peritoneal metastases undergoing cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy

BackgroundPeritoneal cancer index (PCI) is an important prognostic factor in colorectal cancer peritoneal metastases (CRPM), however it fails to consider the time period over which disease burden develops. The volume-time index (VTI) is the ratio between PCI and time from primary tumour resection.MethodsA retrospective cohort study of 182 patients managed from 1996 to 2017 was performed.ResultsAs stratified by high vs low VTI groups, median overall survival (OS) was 23 months (95% 17–46) vs 44 months (95% 35–72) with a difference in 5-year OS of 20.3% (95%CI 10.2–40.4) vs 40.1% (95%CI 29.7–54.1), p = 0.002. No difference in 5-year recurrence free survival (RFS) exists. On multivariable analysis, an elevated VTI was independently associated with poorer OS (adjusted HR 3.20, 95%CI 1.64–6.23, p < 0.001) and RFS (adjusted HR 1.90, 95%CI 1.10–3.29, p = 0.02).ConclusionVTI is an independent prognostic factor for OS and RFs in patients with CRPM undergoing CRS/IPC, behaving as a surrogate of tumour aggressiveness.     

Treatment outcomes of breast cancer liver metastasis treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy

BackgroundTo assess the outcomes of breast cancer liver metastasis (BCLM) treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and systemic treatment.Materials and methodsPatients with oligometastasis at the time of liver metastasis (LM) or who became oligometastatic (≤5 metastases) after systemic treatment were assessed. Twenty-nine liver metastatic lesions were treated with a total of 54 Gy delivered in 3 fractions. The local control (LC), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were calculated using Kaplan-Meier analyses.ResultsA total of 22 patients with 29 liver metastatic lesions treated with liver SBRT between April 2013 and September 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. After a median follow-up time of 16.0 months (range 4.4–59.4 months), 18 patients (82%) had disease recurrence, median of 7.4 months (range 1.0–27.9 months) after completion of liver SBRT. The 1- and 2-year OS rates were 85% and 57%, and the 1- and 2-year PFS rates were 38% and 8%, respectively. The 1- and 2-year LC rates were 100% and 88%, respectively. No significant prognostic factors, including disease extension, size of metastasis, number of liver metastasis and timing of liver metastasis, hormonal status affecting OS, PFS and LC were found. No patients experienced Grade 4 or 5 toxicity; furthermore, only one patient experienced rib fracture 6 months after completion of treatment, and one patient had a duodenal ulcer.ConclusionThis study is the first to evaluate the feasibility of SBRT to BCLM patients. Liver SBRT is a conservative approach with excellent LC and limited toxicities.     

Clinical outcomes and treatment practice patterns of patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer in the post-trastuzumab era

BackgroundTrastuzumab is associated with improvements in overall survival (OS) among patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC); however disease course and patterns of care in individual patients are highly variable.Methods113 HER2-positive patients diagnosed with MBC from 1999 to 2005 who received trastuzumab-based therapy were retrospectively identified to allow for a minimum of 5 years of follow-up time. Median OS and median duration of therapy were determined using Kaplan–Meier methodology and group comparisons were based on the log-rank test. Hazard ratios (HR) were obtained using a Cox proportional hazards model.ResultsMedian OS was 3.5 years (95% CI 3.0–4.4) from time of initiation of first therapy in the metastatic setting. On univariate analysis, central nervous system (CNS) disease at first recurrence was associated with a shorter OS compared with liver and/or lung metastases or other sites (CNS: 1.9 years CI 0.1–5.9, liver/lung: 3.2 years CI 2.5–4.2, other: 4.6 years CI 2.7–8.0; p = 0.05), however, this was not predictive of survival outcome in multivariate analysis. CNS metastases developed in 62 (55%) patients by the time of death or last follow-up. Median duration of therapy was similar up to 6 lines of treatment, and ranged from 5.2 months to 7.2 months.ConclusionsThe natural history of HER2-positive MBC has evolved with trastuzumab-based therapy with median OS now exceeding 3 years. CNS disease is a major problem with continued risk of CNS progression over time. Patients demonstrate clinical benefit to multiple lines of HER2-directed therapy.     

Liver Resection for Non-colorectal Non-neuroendocrine Metastases: Where Do We Stand Today Compared to Colorectal Cancer?

The continuing controversy about surgery for non-colorectal non-neuroendocrine liver metastases (NCRNNE) necessitates identifying risk factors of worsened outcomes to improve patient selection and survival. Prospectively collected data of 167 patients undergoing hepatectomy for NCRNNE were analyzed, and a comparison to a matched population of colorectal liver metastases (CLM) was performed. Overall survival (OS) (35 vs. 54 months; P?=?0.008) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) (15 vs. 29 months; P?=?0.004) of NCRNNE patients were significantly shorter compared to those with CLM. The best survival was found in the genitourinary (GU; OS, 45 months; RFS, 21 months) NCRNNE subgroup, whereas survival for gastrointestinal (GI) metastases was low (OS, 8 months; RFS, 7 months). Patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) showed excellent outcomes when compared to CLM (OS, 50 vs. 51 months; P?=?0.901). Extrahepatic disease (EHD) was identified as independent prognostic factor for reducing both RFS (P?=?0.040) and OS (P?=?0.046). The number of liver lesions (P?=?0.024), residual tumor (P?=?0.025), and major complications (P?=?0.048) independently diminished OS. The degree of survival advantage by surgery is determined by the primary tumor site, EHD, the number of metastases, and residual tumor. Thus—even more than in CLM—these oncological selection criteria must prevail. GU metastases, especially RCC, represent a favorable subgroup.