Impact of bleach cleaning on the performance of dialyzers with polysulfone membranes processed for reuse using peracetic Acid

Dialyzer performance may change with reuse depending on whether or not the dialyzer is cleaned with bleach. Bleach is usually used in conjunction with formaldehyde as the germicide. Because few data are available for dialyzers cleaned with bleach and disinfected with peracetic acid, we examined dialyzer performance in a cross-over study of dialyzers containing polysulfone membranes reprocessed using bleach and peracetic acid or peracetic acid alone. Each dialyzer was used for a total of 16 treatments, or until it failed standard criteria for continued use. Urea, beta2-microglobulin, and albumin removal were determined during the first, second, seventh, and 16th use of each dialyzer. Urea removal did not differ between the two reprocessing methods and did not change with reuse. Overall, beta2-microglobulin removal remained unchanged in dialyzers reprocessed with peracetic acid alone, but tended to increase after the seventh use in dialyzers reprocessed with bleach and peracetic acid. Approximately 60% of beta2-microglobulin removal resulted from trapping of beta2-microglobulin at the dialyzer membrane. Albumin loss into the dialysate was clinically insignificant throughout the study with both reprocessing methods. These data show that the clearance of both small and large molecules by dialyzers containing polysulfone membranes is well maintained by reprocessing with peracetic acid and that additional cleaning with bleach has limited impact on performance.     

Dialyzer reuse--part II: advantages and disadvantages

Although single dialyzer use and reuse by chemical reprocessing are both associated with some complications, there is no definitive advantage to either in this respect. Some complications occur mainly at the first use of a dialyzer: a new cellophane or cuprophane membrane may activate the complement system, or a noxious agent may be introduced to the dialyzer during production or generated during storage. These agents may not be completely removed during the routine rinsing procedure. The reuse of dialyzers is associated with environmental contamination, allergic reactions, residual chemical infusion (rebound release), inadequate concentration of disinfectants, and pyrogen reactions. Bleach used during reprocessing causes a progressive increase in dialyzer permeability to larger molecules, including albumin. Reprocessing methods without the use of bleach are associated with progressive decreases in membrane permeability, particularly to larger molecules. Most comparative studies have not shown differences in mortality between centers reusing and those not reusing dialyzers, however, the largest cluster of dialysis-related deaths occurred with single-use dialyzers due to the presence of perfluorohydrocarbon introduced during the manufacturing process and not completely removed during preparation of the dialyzers before the dialysis procedure. The cost savings associated with reuse is substantial, especially with more expensive, high-flux synthetic membrane dialyzers. With reuse, some dialysis centers can afford to utilize more efficient dialyzers that are more expensive; consequently they provide a higher dose of dialysis and reduce mortality. Some studies have shown minimally higher morbidity with chemical reuse, depending on the method. Waste disposal is definitely decreased with the reuse of dialyzers, thus environmental impacts are lessened, particularly if reprocessing is done by heat disinfection. It is safe to predict that dialyzer reuse in dialysis centers will continue because it also saves money for the providers. Saving both time for the patient and money for the provider were the main motivations to design a new machine for daily home hemodialysis. The machine, developed in the 1990s, cleans and heat disinfects the dialyzer and lines in situ so they do not need to be changed for a month. In contrast, reuse of dialyzers in home hemodialysis patients treated with other hemodialysis machines is becoming less popular and is almost extinct.     

Effect of RenNew-D as a sterilant on the performance of reused dialyzers

RenNew-D (Alcide), a novel demand-release sporocidal agent, was employed instead of formaldehyde in the reprocessing for reuse of cuprophan hollow fiber dialyzers (Gambro) and the performance of these dialyzers was evaluated over 40 consecutive dialyses in six patients on maintenance hemodialysis. When RenNew-D was part of automated reprocessing performed with 4.3% bleach as specified by the manufacturer (Lixivitron), dialyzer survival was prolonged (16.7 +/- 7.2 uses) and hemodialysis neutropenia was unchanged with reuse. When RenNew-D was part of manual reprocessing conducted in the absence of bleach, marked improvement in dialyzer biocompatibility was observed but with a decreased survival (4.8 +/- 3.0). The majority of dialyzer failures were due to a fall in fiber bundle volume below a 85% set limit. Small solute clearances were maintained with both types of reprocessing. Dialyses were well tolerated throughout. Our data suggest that RenNew-D is a safe and efficacious product which can serve as a valuable alternative to formaldehyde for the purpose of dialyzer reuse.     

Dialyzer Reuse Following Manual Reprocessing with a New Sterilant, RenNew-D

Dialysis patients are at risk for toxicity from formaldehyde used in the reprocessing of dialyzers for reuse; therefore, replacing formaldehyde as a dialyzer sterilant would be advantageous. The potential for RenNew-D as a sterilizing agent was investigated in seven stable in-center hemodialysis patients over 20 consecutive dialyses with cuprammonium cellulose hollow-fiber dialyzers. Treatment with RenNew-D showed no toxicity to patients or dialyzers except for two blood leaks occurring in one patient. The mean number of dialyzer uses was 4.9. In all the dialyzers that passed functional testing small solute clearances were maintained with reuse. The ability of RenNew-D to improve the biocompatibility of reused dialyzers was documented with mean neutrophil counts falling to only 78% of initial values during first reuse of dialyzers processed with RenNew-D compared with a decrease in neutrophil count to 2% of initial values during first use of the same dialyzers. Our results suggest that RenNew-D may be a useful alternative to formaldehyde for the purpose of dialyzer reuse. A reuse procedure that includes processing with RenNew-D is associated with improved biocompatibility, possibly because of maintenance of the blood-derived membrane coating established during prior dialysis.     

Effect of dialyzer geometry on granulocyte and complement activation

During hemodialysis with cuprophan membranes, the complement system as well as leukocytes become activated. In order to clarify the role of dialyzer geometry, the effect of hollow-fiber versus flat-sheet dialyzers and of different surface areas on C3a generation and leukocyte degranulation was investigated. Plasma levels of leukocyte elastase in complex with alpha 1-proteinase inhibitor were significantly increased after 1 h (+55%) and 3 h (+62%) of hemodialysis with flat-sheet dialyzers as compared to hollow-fiber devices. In addition, plasma levels of lactoferrin, released from the specific granules of leukocytes during activation, were significantly higher (+42%) 3 h after the onset of dialysis treatment with flat-sheet than with hollow-fiber dialyzers. With respect to surface area, larger dialyzers tended to cause more release of leukocyte elastase as compared to dialyzers with smaller surface areas, irrespectively of the configuration of the dialyzer used. On the other hand, activation of the complement system, as measured by the generation of C3a-desarg, did not differ with both types of configurations. The same held true for leukopenia, which was almost identical for hollow-fiber and flat-sheet dialyzers. From these findings two lines of evidence emerge: First, not only the type of membrane material used in a dialyzer may influence its biocompatibility, but the geometry of the extracorporeal device also determines the degree of compatibility. Hence, the extent of leukocyte activation correlated with both configuration of the dialyzer and surface area of the membrane.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Water permeability of high-flux dialyzer membranes after Renalin reprocessing

Dialysis with high-flux membranes is widely used, in part, because they are thought to increase the removal of middle molecules when compared with low-flux membranes. Dialyzer reprocessing; however, is thought to alter middle molecule clearance. Renalin, a mixture of germicidal agents, has widespread use in dialyzer reprocessing. We determined the effect of Renalin reprocessing on the water permeability of three different dialyzers of Fresenius (F80A and 200A) and Gambro (17R) manufacture using the dead-end filtration method. Two hundred and seventeen, predominantly used but some new, dialyzers were evaluated. Water permeability of the used, but not the new, dialyzers fell abruptly and dramatically with reprocessing. The permeability fell almost 70% in the F80A dialyzer after three reprocessing procedures with similar, but somewhat slower declines, seen in the other two dialyzers. We conclude that there is a decline in water permeability seen in Renalin reprocessed dialyzers. This factor and the associated change in solute clearance and ultrafiltration characteristics should be considered in assessing the effectiveness of dialyzer reprocessing.     

Dilemma of Membrane Biocompatibility and Reuse

Abstract: Numerous articles have been published on the multiple use of dialyzers and on the effect of different reprocessing chemicals and techniques on the dialyzer biocompatibility and performance. The results often appear contradictory, especially those comparing standard biocompatibility parameters. Despite this confusion, a discerning review of the published works allows certain limited conclusions to be drawn. Reprocessing of used hemodialyzers changes the biocompatibility profile of a dialyzer as defined by the parameters complement activation. leukopenia, and cytokine release. The effect of reprocessing depends on the chemicals and reprocessing technique applied and also on the type of membrane polymer being subjected to the reprocessing procedure. Reports of pyrogenic reactions indicate that the flux of the membrane also influences how suitable it is for safe reuse. An increased risk of allergic and pyrogenic reactions appears to be associated with dialyzer reuse. Furthermore, there has been a lack of investigations into the immunologic effect of the layer of adsorbed and chemically altered proteins that remains on the inner surface of reprocessed dialyzers. We conclude that the clinical benefit of dialyzer reuse cannot be generally accepted from a biocompatibility point of view.     

Plasma levels of granulocyte elastase during hemodialysis: effects of different dialyzer membranes

Plasma levels of granulocyte elastase in complex with alpha 1-proteinase inhibitor during hemodialysis were investigated in 15 patients (37.4 +/- 3.2 years) undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (47.0 +/- 12.9 months) with dialyzers made from cellulose hydrate, cuprophan, polymethylmethacrylate, ethylene-vinyl alcohol copolymer, and polyacrylonitrile. Cellulose hydrate membrane caused a maximal increase of the plasma levels of granulocyte elastase in complex with alpha 1-proteinase inhibitor (E-alpha 1PI: 1,659.0 +/- 256.8 ng/ml). Patients dialyzed with polyacrylonitrile dialyzers failed to exhibit comparable plasma levels of granulocyte elastase (E-alpha 1PI: 237.8 +/- 22.9 ng/ml). During hemodialysis plasma E-alpha 1PI values rose to a peak 643.0 +/- 174.7 ng/ml in patients on polymethylmethacrylate dialyzers, to 557.5 +/- 120.0 ng/ml on cuprophan dialyzers, but to only 381.9 +/- 54.0 ng/ml on ethylene-vinyl alcohol copolymer dialyzers. Plasma lysozyme levels decreased significantly in the presence of polyacrylonitrile and polymethylmethacrylate membranes. We conclude that the degree of PMNs stimulation depends on the nature of the dialyzer membrane material. The following membranes induce a reaction of increasing intensity: polyacrylonitrile, ethylene-vinyl alcohol copolymer, cuprophan, polymethylmethacrylate, and cellulose hydrate.     

Effect of gamma radiation versus ethylene oxide sterilization of dialyzers and blood lines on plasma levels of granulocyte elastase in hemodialyzed patients

The effect of gamma versus ethylene oxide sterilization of different dialyzers (polyacrylonitrile, cuprophan) and blood lines on plasma levels of granulocyte elastase and of lysozyme during hemodialysis was investigated in 17 chronically uremic patients. Plasma levels of granulocyte elastase increased during hemodialysis but significantly less in the presence of polyacrylonitrile compared with cuprophan membranes. In contrast, enhanced lysozyme plasma levels decreased during dialysis using the polyacrylonitrile dialyzer to values of healthy controls and remained unchanged using the cuprophan dialyzer. Both effects were not influenced by the way of sterilization. We conclude that granulocyte activation during hemodialysis occurs independently of the sterilization procedure of dialyzers and blood lines in patients showing no clinical signs of hypersensitivity.     

Biocompatibility aspects of dialyzer reprocessing: a comparison of 3 re-use methods and 3 membranes

While formalin reprocessing of cuprophan dialyzer membranes is known to improve their biocompatibility, the effects of different re-use methods have not been systematically investigated on different membranes. Therefore, the effects of reprocessing with formalin, hypochlorite-formalin and peracetic acid were successively investigated in 3 groups of 4 patients dialyzed on cuprophan (CU), cellulose acetate (CA) or polysulfone (PS). Leukocyte count, thrombocyte count and complement activation were studied during second and third use of the dialyzer. Formalin 3% storage was found to improve leukopenia, thrombocyte count and complement activation on CU but not on PS or CA where leukocyte and thrombocyte count worsened. Hypochlorite 1% rinsing prior to formalin 3% storage abolished the improvements observed on CU with formalin and induced on CA and PS the same leukopenia as formalin. In contrast, peracetic acid storage improved leukopenia, complement activation and thrombocyte count on the 3 membranes. In addition, it was found that storage of plasma-treated membrane fragments with peracetic acid abolished neutrophil oxygen radical production. Thus it appears that re-used membranes may not be systematically assumed to be more biocompatible, this property varying with both the type of membrane and the reprocessing technique.     

Plasma levels of main granulocyte components in patients dialyzed with polycarbonate and cuprophan membranes

Plasma levels of granulocyte lactoferrin, granulocyte myeloperoxidase and granulocyte elastase in complex with alpha 1-proteinase inhibitor (E-alpha 1PI) were investigated in regular hemodialysis patients dialyzed with hollow-fiber dialyzers made from polycarbonate (FD 100) or cuprophan (GFS 120 H). Plasma levels of all these main granulocyte components increased significantly during hemodialysis. E-alpha 1PI levels were significantly higher in patients dialyzed with the polycarbonate compared with the cuprophan membrane, whereas the increases of myeloperoxidase and lactoferrin were not different for the two dialyzers. On the other hand, plasma C3a levels were higher in patients dialyzed with the cuprophan compared with the polycarbonate dialyzer. Therefore, granulocyte activation during hemodialysis does not necessarily need complement activation.     

Dialyzer reuse-Part I: Historical perspective

The first apparatus for hemodialysis in animals, made painstakingly by Abel et al. in their laboratory at the beginning of 20th century, was cleaned with acid-pepsin to digest blood, disinfected with thymol, and reused for up to 30 experiments for as long as 8 months. The obvious incentive was saving time. In the early years of hemodialysis in patients, dialyzers and lines were assembled and sterilized immediately before dialysis. Various methods of dry and moist heat sterilization and miscellaneous chemical agents were employed for disinfection. Significant time was required to assemble the dialyzers, so there was an incentive to reuse previously assembled dialyzers to save time, especially for home hemodialysis. Bleach to clean and formaldehyde to disinfect the membranes and lines was used for this purpose. Preassembled dialyzers, commercially introduced in the 1950s, were the most expensive components of hemodialysis systems, therefore reprocessing of these dialyzers was the most effective way to save money. Refrigeration of coil dialyzers with blood, introduced in the mid-1960s, was associated with frequent febrile reactions and was soon abandoned. Preassembled coil and plate dialyzers permitted almost complete return of blood after dialysis and led to the introduction of chemical disinfection for dialyzer reprocessing. A variety of disinfectants have been used. Formaldehyde was the most common disinfectant until the end of the 1970s. Sodium hypochlorite was used to clean the majority of dialyzers and to sterilize dialyzers with polyacrylonitrile membranes. In the early 1980s, peracetic acid and glutaraldehyde started to compete with formaldehyde. By the 1990s, formaldehyde had become less popular than peracetic acid. In the mid-1990s, disinfection and membrane cleaning with acetic acid and heat was introduced. Manual reprocessing was replaced by early reuse machines in the mid-1970s and a more sophisticated second generation of automated hemodialyzer reprocessing machines followed in the late 1970s. Recently disinfection of dialyzers with moist heat has resumed. Saving both time for the patient and money for the provider were the main motivations for designing a new machine for daily home hemodialysis. The machine, developed in the 1990s, cleans and moist-heat disinfects the dialyzer and lines in situ so they do not need to be changed for a month. In contrast, the reuse of dialyzers in home hemodialysis patients treated with other hemodialysis machines has become less popular and is almost extinct.     

Beta 2-microglobulin kinetics in maintenance hemodialysis: a comparison of conventional and high-flux dialyzers and the effects of dialyzer reuse

beta 2-Microglobulin (beta 2M) forms synovial and bony amyloid deposits in long-term hemodialysis patients. To define the kinetics of beta 2M during hemodialysis and the effects of dialyzer reprocessing, we measured serum beta 2M, plasma C3a, and neutrophil counts immediately predialysis; 15, 90, and 180 minutes after beginning dialysis; and 15 minutes postdialysis in ten chronic hemodialysis patients. The studies were performed during first and third uses of cuprammonium rayon and polysulfone dialyzers processed by rinsing with water, then bleach, in an automated system (Seratronics DRS 4) and then packed in 1.5% formaldehyde. Mean serum beta 2M (corrected for ultrafiltration) decreased by 16.6% +/- 18.1% with new cuprammonium dialyzers and 57.1% +/- 12.8% with new polysulfone dialyzers. Dialyzer reprocessing had no significant effect on this decline. Predialysis serum beta 2M decreased by 30.4% +/- 15.5% 1 month after switching from cuprammonium to polysulfone dialyzers; these levels remained stable after 3 months of dialysis with polysulfone. Complement activation and neutropenia during dialysis were significantly more marked with cuprammonium, but were not affected by reprocessing of either dialyzer. In vitro adsorption of 124I-beta 2M to polysulfone fibers was greater than to cuprammonium; adsorption was not influenced by dialyzer reprocessing.     

Effect of peracetic acid reprocessing on the transport characteristics of polysulfone hemodialyzers

Peracetic acid is used extensively for reprocessing hemodialyzers, despite several indications that reprocessing alters the dialyzer transport characteristics. The objective of this study was to obtain quantitative data for the effects of peracetic acid reprocessing on the clearance and sieving coefficients of urea, vitamin B12, and polydisperse dextrans using Fresenius F80A polysulfone dialyzers. Reprocessing restored the urea and vitamin B12 clearance to close to their original values. However, the reprocessed dialyzers had substantially lower clearance of the larger molecular weight dextrans, which was attributed to reductions in the effective pore size caused by residual plasma proteins within the membrane. Storage in peracetic acid provided some additional removal of residual proteins, although the clearance and sieving coefficients of the larger dextrans remained well below their original values. Peracetic acid caused no degradation of the membrane polymer, in sharp contrast to results obtained with bleach reprocessing.     

Properties of membranes used for hemodialysis therapy

Recent trends show a progressive increase in the use of modified cellulosic and synthetic dialyzers and a corresponding decrease in the utilization rate of unmodified cellulosic dialyzers. The purpose of this article is to describe current membrane and dialyzer technology, with the focus almost entirely on modified cellulosic and synthetic membranes. A general overview of membrane-related determinants of dialyzer performance is first presented, followed by a discussion of specific characteristics of some of the more commonly used membranes and dialyzers.     

Reprocessing of hemodialyzers: a critical appraisal

The reprocessing of hemodialysis equipment was originally developed to conserve scarce resources and to reduce the time necessary to construct early dialyzers. Although most dialyzers in current use are marketed as disposable items, the majority of dialysis facilities in the United States reprocess these devices and use them multiple times on the same patient. Recent studies have shown that certain reprocessing techniques confer improved biological properties on dialyzers compared with new membranes as prepared by manufacturers. Several studies have suggested that these biological properties may lead to improved clinical outcomes. However, critics of dialyzer reprocessing argue that it may expose patients to risks that produce increased morbidity and mortality. This article critically reviews the available scientific information regarding reprocessing hemodialyzers.     

The effects of reprocessing high-flux polysulfone dialyzers with peroxyacetic acid on beta 2-microglobulin removal in hemodiafiltration.

The reuse of dialyzers is widely practiced, especially in the United States. Despite this, the effects of reuse on the efficacy of removal of solutes and more recently proteins such as beta 2-microglobulin (beta 2M) are the subject of much debate. There is considerable evidence to suggest that reuse after cleansing and sterilizing with formalin, with or without bleach, maintains dialyzer performance. In this study, we have examined peroxyacetic acid use as the cleansing and sterilizing agent using Renatron machines. We analyzed reuse in 24 patients using polysulfone membranes in a hemodiafiltration (HDF) unit over a 2-year period. The mean maximum number of uses achieved was 20.1 +/- 0.5. Several factors considered clinically to influence the number of reuses achievable (hemoglobin, white blood cell, and platelet levels, erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR], and fibrinogen and total protein levels) were found not to influence the maximum number of uses obtainable. We then assessed prospectively the performance of 26 polysulfone dialyzers after peroxyacetic acid reprocessing up to 20 times, particularly with regard to their ability to remove beta 2M. We report that this combination of polysulfone membranes reprocessed with peroxyacetic acid used for HDF up to 20 times exhibits a maintained high level removal of compounds beyond a molecular weight (MW) of 12,000. Any secondary membrane formation that occurs appears not to influence the subsequent removal of beta 2M. Thus, we would recommend the use of peroxyacetic acid for reprocessing dialyzers in a safe and efficacious manner.     

Association of dialyzer reuse and hospitalization rates among hemodialysis patients in the US

OBJECTIVES: To determine if reuse of hemodialyzers is associated with higher rates of hospitalization and their resulting costs among end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. METHODS: Noncurrent cohort study of hospitalization rates among 27,264 ESRD patients beginning hemodialysis in the United States in 1986 and 1987. RESULTS: Dialysis in free-standing facilities reprocessing dialyzers was associated with a greater rate of hospitalization than in facilities not reprocessing (relative rate (RR) = 1.08, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.02-1.14). This higher rate of hospitalization was observed with dialyzer reuse using peracetic/acetic acids (RR = 1.11, CI 1. 04-1.18) and formaldehyde (RR = 1.07, CI 1.00-1.14), but not glutaraldehyde (p = 0.97). There was no difference among hospitalization rates in hospital-based facilities reprocessing dialyzers with any sterilant and those not reprocessing. Hospitalization for causes other than vascular access morbidity in free-standing facilities reusing dialyzers with formaldehyde was not different from hospitalization in facilities not reusing. However, reuse with peracetic/acetic acids was associated with higher rates of hospitalization than formaldehyde (RR = 1.08, CI 1.03-1.15). CONCLUSIONS: Dialysis in free-standing facilities reprocessing dialyzers with peracetic/acetic acids or formaldehyde was associated with greater hospitalization than dialysis without dialyzer reprocessing. This greater hospitalization accounts for a large increment in inpatient stays in the USA. These findings raise important concerns about potentially avoidable morbidity among hemodialysis patients. Copyright Copyright 1999 S. Karger AG, Basel     

Multi-Chambered Dialyzers and Their Efficiencies

The performance of a dialyzer at a given test condition is strongly affected by its design and flow patterns as well as other factors such as membrane permeability, membrane area and liquid-side resistances. Mathematical solutions that describe multichambered dialyzers in both countercurrent and cocurrent dialysis modes are given. In limiting cases, as the number of chambers approaches infinity, these solutions yield a simple equation which is essentially the solution to a cross-flow dialyzer in which blood is unmixed and dialysate fluid is mixed. Currently, it is a rather tedious process to obtain a theoretical dialysance value for a cross-flow dialyzer even though many such dialyzers are widely used. In reality, a dialyzer cannot achieve its theoretical performance level because actual flow patterns and flow distributions are not ideal. The effect of non-ideality as a percentage of channeling of dialysate fluid was accounted for in the performance calculations of various types of dialyzers. The ideal single-chambered dialyzer in the countercurrent mode has the highest theoretical performance. Its performance, however, decreases rapidly as the degree of the non-ideality increases, while multi-chambered dialyzers are relatively insensitive to deviation from the ideal condition.     

Dialyzer-dependent changes in solute and water permeability with bleach reprocessing

The effects of bleach reprocessing on the performance of high-flux dialyzers have not been comprehensively characterized. We compared the effects of automated bleach/formaldehyde reprocessing on solute and hydraulic permeability for cellulose triacetate (CT190) and polysulfone (F80B) dialyzers using an in vitro model. Dialyzers were studied after initial blood exposure (R0) and after 1 (R1), 5 (R5), 10 (R10), and 15 (R15) reuse cycles. Ultrafiltration coefficient (K(uf)), serial clearances, and/or sieving coefficients (SCs) of urea, creatinine, vancomycin, inulin, myoglobin, and albumin were determined. Urea, creatinine, and vancomycin clearances and SCs did not significantly differ from R0 to R15 with either dialyzer. Inulin clearances and SC also did not significantly change from R0 to R15 for the CT190. However, these same values for the F80B significantly increased (P < 0.05). The inulin clearance and SC values for the CT190 dialyzer were significantly higher than those for the F80B at all stages except R15. Myoglobin clearances significantly increased over 15 reuses for both dialyzers (P < 0.01). However, CT190 myoglobin clearances were significantly higher at all stages (R0 = 37.7 +/- 9.7; R15 = 52.5 +/- 8.8 mL/min) than the F80B (R0 = negligible; R15 = 41.3 +/- 16.5 mL/min; P < 0.01). Albumin pre- and postdialysis SCs significantly increased for both dialyzers (P < 0.01). K(uf) for R0 and R15 were 52.3 +/- 3.3 and 52.6 +/- 7.6 mL/h/mm Hg for CT190 (P = not significant) and 48.8 +/- 4.4 and 87.3 +/- 7.0 mL/h/mm Hg for F80B (P < 0.0001). We conclude that bleach reprocessing significantly increases larger solute and hydraulic permeability of high-flux cellulosic and polysulfone dialyzers. This effect is more pronounced for the polysulfone membrane. Until 10 reuses or greater, the removal of solutes greater than 1,500 d is significantly compromised with the polysulfone dialyzer used in this study.