右室流出道特发性室速的射频消融治疗体会

目的 总结不同起源部位特发性右室流出道室性心动过速（ＩＲＶＯＴ）经导管射频消融（ＲＦＣＡ）治疗的方法和结果。方法 对３５例ＩＲＶＯＴ进行ＲＦＣＡ治疗,男性１８例、女性１７例,平均年龄（３９．１±１８．３）岁（８～７２岁）。其中１５例用常规方法消融,２０例用非常规方法消融,非常规方法加用８Ｆ ＳＢ０ Ｓｗａｒｔｚ鞘并在右室流出道放置参考电极。两者均采用起搏与激动标测来确定消融靶点。结果ＲＦＣＡ治疗ＩＲＶＯＴ的总成功率为８８．６％（３３／３５）,常规方法组成功率为８６．７％,复发率为１５．３％,非常规方法组分别为９０．１％和５．６％;常规方法组的导管操作时间为（７１±１２）ｍｉｎ,Ｘ线曝光时间平均为（３２±８）ｍｉｎ,非常规组分别为（４０± ９）ｍｉｎ和（１６ ±５）ｍｉｎ。ＩＲＶＯＴ起自右室流出道近间隔部１３例、游离壁１０ 例及介于两者之间 １２例。成功消融部位激动标测 Ｖ波提前 ＱＲＳ波 １８～３８ｍｓ,起搏标测与心动过速时１２导联心电图（ＥＣＧ）之ＱＲＳ波形态完全相同。结论ＩＲＶＯＴ非常规方法消融可以明显缩短导管操作时间、减少Ｘ线曝光时间及降低复发率;ＩＲＶＯＴ采用ＲＦＣＡ治疗具有较高的成功率和较低的复发率及并发症。     

导管射频消蚀术治疗特发性室性心动过速（附五例报告）

导管射频消蚀术（ＲＦＣＡ）治疗特发性室性心动过速（ＩＶＴ）５例。其中ＩＶＴ起源于左室间隔区３例，右室流出道２例。４例在ＩＶＴ发作中于室内标测到较体表ＱＲＳ波提早３０～５０ｍｓ的局部电位，在此点给予射频电流，ＩＶＴ即刻终止；１例ＩＶＴ行起搏标测，在左室中间隔区标测到与ＩＶＴ时１２导联相同的ＱＲＳ波群，在该部位给予射频电流。全部病例术后停用各种抗心律失常药物，随访１～４个月，无ＩＶＴ复发，无并发症，表明ＲＦＣＡ是根治ＩＶＴ安全有效的方法。     

特发性室性心动过速射频消融治疗的临床研究

射频消融３１例特发性室性心动过速（ＩＶＴ）,对其定位、标测方法及复发原因进行探讨。采取激动和（或）起搏标测结合的方法进行标测和消融治疗。结果：右室ＩＶＴ１３例。起源于流出道部位１２例,其Ｉ导联以Ｑ波为主者偏前,ｒ波为主者偏后;Ｖ３导联的Ｒ／Ｓ＞１者在上部,Ｒ／Ｓ＜１者在下部。游离壁１例电轴左偏。起搏标测靶点心电图ＩＶＴ时与１２导联心电图一致,局部电位提前４２．０８±８．９１ｍｓ。１例术后复发。左室ＩＶＴ１８例。起源间隔者１４例,随着起源点从基底部向心尖部移行,电轴更右偏;游离壁４例电轴明显左偏。靶点局部电图均提前３２．１９±８．３６ｍｓ。左室间隔部ＩＶＴ记录到浦肯野纤维电位（ＰＰ）７例、异常电位（ＡＰ）４例;１例未记录到ＰＰ及ＡＰ且起搏标测１０导联心电图一致,术后复发。２例未诱发ＩＶＴ,均以起搏标测消融成功。左室游离壁起搏标测１２导联心电图一致３例,１１导联一致者１例且术后复发。３例４例次复发,１例（左室间隔ＩＶＴ）未再接受消融治疗,２例最终采用温控导管消融成功。结论：体表心电图对ＩＶＴ起源点定位有指导意义;激动标测与起搏标测相结合的方法更好。     

射频消融治疗特发性室性心动过速

１２例特发性室性心动过速（室速）病人，７例为左室室速，５例为右室空速，采用激动标测和起搏标测方法，左室室速在室间隔中下部，右室室速在右室流出道寻找消融靶点。结果７例左室室速成功６例，局部激动Ｖ波较体表。Ｃ电图ＱＲＳ波提前２５～５０ｍｓ。右室室速５例全部消融成功，Ｖ波提前２０～４０ｍｓ。消融术程１～４小时，Ｘ线曝光时间３０±２４分钟。无１例出现并发症。     

后间隔旁道体表心电图及心内电图的特征

总结射频消融成功的后间隔旁道３７例体表及心内电图特征，结果显示：显性后间隔旁道体表心电图Ⅱ、Ⅲ、ａＶＦ导联δ波负向，ＱＲＳ波群在Ｖ２导联呈Ｒ或Ｒｓ形时，若Ｖ１导联为ｒＳＲ或Ｒｓ形诊断为左后间隔旁道，其敏感性７３．３％、特异性９１．７％；Ｖ１导联为ＱＳ形诊断为右后间隔旁道，其敏感性５８．３％、特异性１００％。冠状窦电极为间距１ｃｍ的４极标测电极，近端电极置于窦口。心动过速时，心内电图ΔＶＡＨ－ＣＳ（ＶＡＨ与最短ＶＡｃｓ的差值）≥２５ｍｓ提示左侧，敏感性６２．８％、特异性９３．７％；ΔＶＡｃｓ（冠状窦电极记录的最长与最短ＶＡ的差值）≤１５ｍｓ提示左侧，敏感性８７．５％，特异性９５．４％。此外，左后间隔旁道逆行Ａ波最早出现在冠状窦近端（ＣＳｐ）或冠状窦中端（ＣＳｍ），且冠状窦中端Ａ波（Ａｃｓｍ）均早于希氏束远端（Ｈｉｓｄ）Ａ波（ＡＨｉｓｄ）；右后间隔旁道逆行Ａ波最早出现在Ｈｉｓｄ或ＣＳｐ处，Ａｃｓｍ均晚于ＡＨｉｓｄ。通过体表心电图和心内电图特征，可简便准确地预测间隔旁道的消融靶点。     

显性预激体表12导联心电图定位房室旁路诊断标准的临床研究

目的 研究体表１２导联心电图与显性预激到预激旁路定位的相关关系。方法 本研究采用心外膜标测（ＥＣＭ）手术切断旁路（ＡＰ）、心内膜标测电生理检查（ＥＰＳ）射频消融术（ＲＦＣＡ）离断旁路方法，成功根治１２３例显性预激病人１３３条ＡＰ，并对其体表１２导联主电图进行对比研究。结果 体表心电图（ＳＥＣＧ）的四个特征变化对旁路定位有重要价值。这四个特征是（１）Ｖ１导联ＱＲＳ综合波形态；（２）肢体导入△波极性变     

特发性室性心运过速射频消融治疗的临床研究

射频消融３１例特发性室性心动过速（ＩＶＴ），对其定位、标测方法及复发原因进行探讨。采取激动和（或）起搏标准结合的方法进行标测和消融治疗。结果：右室ＩＶＴ１３例．起源于流出道部位１２例，其Ｉ导联以Ｑ波为主者偏前，ｒ波为主者偏后：Ｖ３导联的Ｒ／Ｓ〉１者在上部，Ｒ／Ｓ〈１者在下部。游离壁１例电轴左房。起搏标测靶点心电图ＩＶＴ时与１２导联心电图一致，局部电位提前４２．０８±８．９１ｍｓ。１例术后复发。左室     

特发性室性心动过速靶点标测与射频消融方法研究

目的探讨特发性室性心动过速（ＩＶＴ）有效靶点标测与射频导管消融（ＲＦＣＡ）放电方法。方法６７例ＩＶＴ病人行ＲＦＣＡ治疗。右室ＩＶＴ（ＩＲＶＴ）和左室ＩＶＴ（ＩＬＶＴ）采用激动标测和起搏标测相结合方法寻找靶点,右室流出道（ＲＯＴ）ＩＲＶＴ用双大头导管交替标测或放置１根４极或１０极电极导管于ＲＯＴ作为参考电极。采用预设６０～７０℃渐增功率温控放电进行消融。结果６７例ＩＶＴ消融成功６２例,成功率９２．５％,其中２３例ＩＲＶＴ成功２１例,１例靶点位于右室流入道,消融成功,２２例位于ＲＯＴ,２０例消融成功;４４例ＩＶＴ成功４１例,１例靶点位于左室游离壁,消融成功,４３例位于左室室间隔部,４０例成功。４例术后出现少量心包积液。结论激动标测和起搏标测相结合是提高ＩＶＴ消融成功率的有效方法。渐增功率温控放电安全可靠。     

A型预激综合征合并左束支阻滞的特殊心电图和心电向量图表现

Ａ型预激综合征合并左束支阻滞 (ＬＢＢＢ)的概率极低 ,因此迄今文献上罕见报道。我院最近检测到 1例并成功消融 ,心电图 (ＥＣＧ)和心电向量图 (ＶＣＧ)呈特殊表现 ,现报道如下。患者男性 ,5 2岁 ,因反复发作阵发性心动过速行消融术治疗。入院时ＥＣＧ和ＶＣＧ见图 1。为明确旁道部位 ,注射　　图 1　入院时ＥＣＧ　上图窦性心律 ,ＰＲ间期 <0 .12ｓ,大部分导联ＰＲ段消失 ,ＱＲＳ波时限 0 .12ｓ。各导联Ｒ峰未见增宽切迹 ,Ⅱ、Ⅲ、ａＶＦ及Ｖ4、Ｖ5导联ＱＲＳ起始部有ｄｅｌｔａ波 ,Ｖ1～Ｖ3 导联呈ｒＳ型 ,Ⅱ、Ⅲ、ａＶＦ导联呈Ｒ型 ,Ⅰ…     

变异型交替性文氏周期2例

例１患者女性 ,３２岁。阵发性心悸４年 ,多次心电图检查诊断为阵发性心房扑动２∶１传导。心脏听诊无杂音 ,超声心动描记术检查无异常。心电图为Ⅱ型心房扑动 ,Ｖ１ 导联 (图１Ａ)心房率２５０次／ｍｉｎ ,ＱＲＳ波群呈室上性型 ,心室率１２５次／ｍｉｎ ,受阻的Ｆ波在ＱＲＳ波群的起始部 ,下传的Ｆ波落在Ｔ波上。从梯形图可见 ,未下传Ｆ波在房室交接区上层受阻。Ｖ１ 导联重复记录 (图１Ｂ)受阻的Ｆ波出现在ＱＲＳ终末、受阻于下层。ａＶＲ导联 (图１Ｃ)Ｆ波规则 ,２５０次／ｍｉｎ ,２∶１下传心室 ,前４个Ｆ＿Ｒ间期短(０．２２ｓ) ,Ｒ…     

右室流出道心律失常的发作方式与单导管消融治疗

报道 33例右室流出道心律失常的发作方式与单导管消融治疗。 3例仅室性早搏 (简称室早 )发作 ,30例室早与室性心动过速 (简称室速 )或心室颤动 (简称室颤 )并存。其中室早合并短阵单形室速 17例 ,合并持续单形室速 6例 ,合并多形室速 4例 ,合并快速室速或心室扑动 2例 ,合并室颤 1例。单点穿刺股静脉后 ,行右房或心室造影 ,将单根多枚电极导管按需放置于右室心尖部或流出道 ,行电生理检查、起搏与激动顺序标测和消融治疗。结果 :消融成功 30例 ,成功率 91%。靶点电图较体表QRS波始点早 38± 12 .4ms。 12例成功靶点位于右室流出道游离壁、9例位于间隔部、5例在游离壁和间隔部作多点片状消融、3例位于肺动脉瓣上、1例在右室流出道间隔部和左室间隔部消融成功。操作时间 5 2± 2 2 .2min ,X线透照时间 2 6± 18.0min ,放电时间 373± 111.7s。术中 1例未诱发心律失常 ,未行消融。 3例发生并发症 ,2例终止消融。 1例右室流出道穿孔 ,心包压塞。 1例多形室速 ,消融中室早多次触发室颤。 1例剧烈胸痛 ,冠状动脉造影示前降支近端 5 0 %局限狭窄。随访 14± 4 .5个月 ,无死亡病例 ,3例复发 ,1例消融 3次均复发 ,复发率 10 %。住院总花费人均 9133± 12 0 0元。结论 :右室流出道心律失常发病形式多种多样 ,单导?     

Possible intramural site of reentrant circuit in ventricular tachycardia of nonischemic cause. Pre and intraoperative mapping studies.

A patient with a drug-refractory sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) of nonischemic cause was mapped for the site of VT origin. The intraoperative mapping showed the earliest site of activation of VT on the epicardial surface at which the initial deflection of the local electrogram preceded the onset of the QRS complex of VT by 45 msec. The endocardial mapping could not indicate the site at which the electrogram was found prior to the onset of the QRS complex of VT. However, at the earliest site of the endocardial mapping, VT was entrained without change in the configuration of the QRS complex. After cessation of the rapid pacing, VT resumed at the intrinsic rate and the first post-paced return cycle was identical to each paced cycle length. The interval from the stimulus to the orthodromically captured local electrogram at the pacing site was identical to the cycle length of VT. Catheter ablation from the endocardial side and a cryoablative procedure from the epicardial side failed to eradicate the VT. These findings suggest an intramural site of VT origin and reentrant circuit of which the exit and the entrance face the epicardial and the endocardial surfaces, respectively.     

Preferential conduction across the ventricular outflow septum in ventricular arrhythmias originating from the aortic sinus cusp.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between the origin and breakout site of idiopathic ventricular tachycardia (VT) or premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) originating from the myocardium around the ventricular outflow tract. BACKGROUND: The myocardial network around the ventricular outflow tract is not well known. METHODS: We studied 70 patients with idiopathic VT (n = 23) or PVCs (n = 47) with a left bundle branch block and inferior QRS axis morphology. Electroanatomical mapping was performed in both the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) and aortic sinus cusp (ASC) during VT or PVCs. RESULTS: The earliest ventricular activation (EVA) was recorded in the RVOT in 55 patients (group R) and in the ASC in 15 (group A). In all group R patients, the closest pace map and successful ablation were achieved at the EVA site. Although a successful ablation was achieved at the EVA site in all group A patients, the closest pace map was obtained at the EVA site in 8 and RVOT in 7 (with an excellent pace map in 4). The stimulus to QRS interval was 0 ms during pacing from the RVOT and 36 +/- 8 ms from the ASC. The distance between the EVA and perfect pace map sites in those 4 patients was 11.9 +/- 3.0 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Ventricular arrhythmias originating from the ASC often show preferential conduction to the RVOT, which may render pace mapping or some algorithms using the electrocardiographic characteristics less reliable. In some of those cases, an insulated myocardial fiber across the ventricular outflow septum may exist.     

Radiofrequency Ablation of Idiopathic Left Anterior Fascicular Tachycardia

Left Anterior Fascicular Tachycardia. Introduction: A 45-year-old man with idiopathic ventricular tachycardia (VT) having a right bundle branch block configuration with right-axis deviation underwent au electrophysiologic test.
Methods and Results: Mapping demonstrated a site on the auterobasal wall of the left ventricle where there was an excellent pace map and an endocardial activation time of -20 msec, hut radiofrequency catheter ablation at this site was unsuccessful. At a nearby site, a presumed Purkinje potential preceded the QRS complex by 30 msec during VT and sinus rhythm, and catheter ablation was effective despite a poor pace map and an endocardial ventricular activation time of zero.
Conclusion: Idiopathic VT with a right bundle branch configuration and right-axis deviation may originate in the area of the left anterior fascicle. A potential presumed to represent a Purkinje potential may he more helpful than endocardial ventricular activation mapping or pace mapping in guiding ablation of this type of VT.     

非接触球囊标测指导血流动力学不稳定性或非持续性室性心动过速的射频消融

目的探讨非接触球囊标测在指导血流动力学不稳定性或非持续性室性心动过速(室速)射频消融中的作用。方法17例室速患者,年龄50岁±9岁,经心室刺激诱发血流动力学不稳定性或非持续性室速后,使用非接触标测系统ENSITE3000标测室速的出口和(或)慢传导区,然后使用温控大头导管在室速出口作环形消融或横跨慢传导区进行线性消融。结果17例患者共诱发18次室速,周长为336MS±58MS。15例患者可确定室速的出口,为QRS波前10MS±16MS;其中5例是心肌梗死后室速,9例为右室流出道室速。5例心肌梗死后室速均可确定舒张期慢传导区,最早的心内膜舒张期电活动在QRS波前60·1MS±42·6MS。3例非持续性室速均可确定最早的心室激动点。18次室速中15次消融成功,1例没有进行消融,2例消融失败。结论非接触球囊心内膜标测能成功指导血流动力学不稳定性或非持续性室速的射频消融。     

Verapamil-Sensitive Left Anterior Fascicular Ventricular Tachycardia: Results of Radiofrequency Ablation in Six Patients

Verapamil-Sensitive Left Anterior Fascicular VT. Introduction: Verapamil-sensitive left ventricular tachycardia (VT) with a right bundle branch block (RBBB) configuration and left-axis deviation bas been demonstrated to arise from the left posterior fascicle, and can be cured by catheter ablation guided by Purkinje potentials. Verapamil-sensitive VT with an RBBB configuration and right-axis deviation is rare, and may originate in the left anterior fascicle. Methods and Results: Six patients (five men and one woman, mean age 54 ± 15 years) with a history of sustained VT with an RBBB configuration and right-axis deviation underwent electrophysiologic study and radiofrequency (RF) ablation. VT was slowed and terminated by intravenous administration of verapamil in all six patients. Left ventricular endocardial mapping during VT identified the earliest ventricular activation in the anterolateral wall of the left ventricle in all patients. RF current delivered to this site suppressed the VT in three patients (ablation at the VT exit). The fused Purkinje potential was recorded at that site, and preceded the QRS complex by 35, 30, and 20 msec, with pace mapping showing an optimal match between the paced rhythm and the clinical VT. In the remaining three patients, RF catheter ablation at the site of the earliest ventricular activation was unsuccessful. In these three patients, Purkinje potential was recorded in the diastolic phase during VT at the mid-anterior left ventricular septum. The Purkinje potential preceded the QRS during VT by 66, 56, and 63 msec, and catheter ablation at these sites was successful (ablation at the zone of slow conduction). During 19 to 46 months of follow-up (mean 32 ± 9 months), one patient in the group of ablation at the VT exit bad sustained VT with a left bundle branch block configuration and an inferior axis, and one patient in the group of ablation at the zone of slow conduction experienced typical idiopathic VT with an RBBB configuration and left-axis deviation. Conclusion: Verapamil-sensitive VT with an RBBB configuration and right-axis deviation originates close to the anterior fascicle. RF catheter ablation can be performed successfully from the VT exit site or the zone of slow conduction where the Purkinje potential was recorded in the diastolic phase.     

非接触心内膜激动标测系统指导消融右室流出道室性心动过速

探讨非接触心内膜激动标测系统(NMS)指导消融右室流出道室性心动过速 (RVOT VT)的临床使用价值。选择 12例RVOT VT患者在NMS EnSite 3000TM指导下进行电生理标测和消融治疗, 经股静脉将 9F64极球囊电极(Array)和普通 7F消融电极送至RVOT采集信号,计算机将采集到的 3 360个点的实时心内膜电图通过逆运算法处理后显示分析RVOT三维立体图上彩色等电势图,确定心动过速时心内膜最早激动点。在脱离X线时,由导航和定位系统实时跟踪导管位置变化,并实施靶点消融。9例能诱发出持续性或非持续性VT, 3例仅能诱发RVOT早搏。与以往传统方法消融的 19例结果相比较,心内膜最早激动时间 (EEAT)较体表心电图QRS波的起点提前(29. 4±12. 3msvs18. 7±8. 1ms,P<0. 01),放电部位减少 ( 5. 7±3. 4vs8. 2±3. 1,P<0. 05 )个,手术时间延长(246. 9±53. 0minvs190. 2±74. 6min,P<0. 05);X线曝光时间(44. 3±17. 5minvs57. 5±20. 1min)、即刻成功率(100% vs84. 2% )、6个月随访成功率(100% vs73. 7% ),没有显著性差异,P均>0. 05。结论:NMS指导消融RV OT VT安全可靠,靶点定位准确,且在提高远期成功率方面有优于传统标测方法的趋势。     

Localization of the isthmus in reentrant circuits by analysis of electrograms derived from clinical noncontact mapping during sinus rhythm and ventricular tachycardia

INTRODUCTION: New methods for electrogram analysis accurately estimated reentrant circuit isthmus location and shape in a canine model. It was hypothesized that these methods also would locate reentrant circuits causing clinical ventricular tachycardia (VT). METHODS AND RESULTS: Intracardiac electrogram recordings, obtained with a noncontact mapping system, were analyzed retrospectively from 14 patients with reentrant VT who had undergone successful radiofrequency ablation for prevention of VT initiation. Unipolar electrograms from 256 uniformly distributed endocardial sites were reconstructed by mathematical transformation. Twenty-seven tachycardias were mapped; 15 (in 11 patients) had a complete endocardial reentrant circuit with a figure-of-eight conduction pattern. During sinus rhythm, the location and axis of the slowest and most uniform conduction in the region of latest endocardial activation (the primary axis), the limits of which were defined as boundaries with >15 ms difference in electrogram duration between contiguous recordings, identified the location and shape of the reentrant circuit isthmus with a mean sensitivity compared with activation mapping of 79.3% and a mean specificity of 97.6%. The midpoint of a theoretical "estimated best ablation line" drawn perpendicular to the primary axis of activation, spanning the estimated isthmus location was within 1.3 +/- 0.2 cm (mean distance +/- SD) of the actual ablation site that terminated tachycardia. Analysis of VT electrograms, based on time shifts in the far-field component of the local electrogram when cycle length changed (piecewise linear adaptive template matching [PLATM] method) in 5 of the cases, accurately estimated the time interval between activation at the recording site and the circuit isthmus slow conduction zone where the effective ablation lesion had been placed, which is proportional to the distance between the two locations (mean difference compared with activation mapping: +/-37.3 ms). CONCLUSION: In selected patients with VT who have a complete endocardial circuit, isthmus location and shape can be discerned by analysis of sinus rhythm or tachycardia electrograms, and an effective ablation site can be predicted without the need to construct activation maps of reentrant circuits.     

Radiofrequency Ablation Guided by Mechanical Termination of Idiopathic Ventricular Arrhythmias Originating in the Right Ventricular Outflow Tract

Mapping of Idiopathic Ventricular Arrhythmias. Background: Termination of ventricular tachycardia (VT) by mechanical pressure has been described for fascicular and postinfarction VT. Mechanical interruption of idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias (VT/premature ventricular complexes [PVCs]) arising in the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) has not been described in systematic fashion. Methods: Eighteen consecutive patients (13 females, age 49 ± 13 years, ejection fraction 0.55 ± 0.12) underwent mapping and ablation of RVOT VT or PVCs. In 7 patients, 9 distinct VTs (mean cycle length 440 ± 127 ms), and in 11 patients, 11 distinct PVCs originating in the RVOT were targeted. Mechanical termination was considered present if a reproducibly inducible VT was no longer inducible or if frequent PVCs suddenly ceased with the mapping catheter at a particular location. Endocardial activation time, electrogram characteristics, and pace‐mapping morphology were assessed at this location. Radiofrequency energy was delivered if mechanical termination was observed. Results: All targeted arrhythmias were successfully ablated. In 7 of 18 patients (39%), catheter manipulation terminated the arrhythmia with the mapping catheter located at a particular site. Local endocardial activation time was earlier at sites of mechanical termination (?31 ± 7 ms) compared with effective sites without termination (?25 ± 3 ms, P = 0.04). The 10‐ms isochronal area was smaller in patients with mechanical interruption (0.35 ± 0.2 cm²) than in patients without mechanical termination (1.33 ± 0.9 cm², P = 0.01). At all sites susceptible to mechanical trauma, the pace map displayed a match with the targeted VT/PVC. All sites where mechanical termination of VT or PVCs occurred were effective ablation sites. Conclusions: Mechanical suppression at the site of origin of idiopathic RVOT arrhythmias frequently occurs during the mapping procedure and is a reliable indicator of effective ablation sites. Mechanical termination of RVOT arrhythmias may be indicative of a more localized arrhythmogenic substrate. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 21, pp. 42–46, January 2010)     

特发性左室室性心动过速非接触球囊导管系统的标测与消融

介绍非接触球囊导管标测系统 (EnSite 30 0 0系统 )指导难治性特发性左室室性心动过速的标测与射频消融的初步经验。 5例男性病人 ,年龄 33± 17(17～ 6 2 )岁 ,常规方法标测和导管消融失败 2 .4± 1.1(1～ 4)次。常规放置高位右房和右室电生理导管 ,运用置入左室的 6 4极球囊导管和大头电极 ,系统重建三维心内膜几何模型和等电势 ,经右室导管诱发VT ,心动过速周期为 32 3.8± 48.1ms。EnSite 30 0 0系统标测到VT的最早激动点分别位于左后间隔中下部、左侧间隔后下部左束支下方、后下间隔近心尖部、左室后壁近基底部和左后间隔中部。在最早激动点和关键峡部分别行点状、环状和线性消融。 2例患者在心动过速时放电、3例患者在窦性心律时消融 ,均获成功。成功消融靶点处的单极电图均为QS型。X线曝光时间为 2 5± 12min。随访 7.8± 4.6 (1～ 11)个月所有患者均未发作心动过速。结果表明 ,与常规方法比较 ,EnSite 30 0 0系统所建立的心腔三维模拟等电势图可直观地显示心动过速的起源点、传导途径和关键峡部 ,系统模拟的单极腔内电图的形态也有助于判断病灶起源部位及提高消融成功率 ,尤其适用于常规方法消融失败的室性心律失常的标测 ,其独特的导航系统可引导消融导管到达靶点部位指导射频消融 ,并可减少X?