Simultaneous Pancreas and Kidney Transplantation With Concurrent Allograft Nephrectomy for Recipients With Prior Renal Transplants Lost to BK Virus Nephropathy: Two Case Reports

Candidacy for retransplantation after allograft loss due to BK virus-associated nephropathy (BKVN) with or without allograft nephrectomy is controversial. This report describes 2 renal transplant recipients who lost their grafts to BKVN and subsequently underwent simultaneous kidney and pancreas transplantation with allograft nephrectomy.     

Does reduction in immunosuppression in viremic patients prevent BK virus nephropathy in de novo renal transplant recipients? A prospective study

BACKGROUND: BK virus nephropathy (BKVN) is a severe complication of renal transplantation, resulting in graft loss in >50% of cases. Because patients with BKV viremia are at high risk for developing BKVN, the aim of our study was to analyze whether early reduction of immunosuppression (IS) could prevent BKVN in viremic patients. METHODS: BKV viruria was prospectively screened every 3 months by real-time polymerase chain reaction during the first year after transplantation in 123 consecutive renal transplant recipients. Plasma viral load was measured by polymerase chain reaction whenever viruria was positive; in viremic patients a graft biopsy was systematically performed and IS was reduced. RESULTS: Viruria, viremia, and BKVN occurred in 48.8%, 10.5%, and 2.4% of patients, respectively. In the 13 patients with positive viremia, initial graft biopsy showed BKVN in two. After reduction of IS in patients without BKVN, viremia disappeared in 8 of 11, decreased in 2 of 11, and increased in one patient who eventually developed BKVN. In contrast, viremia remained positive in one patient with BKVN and disappeared in the second but renal function deteriorated in both of them. Initial viral load was higher in patients who developed BKVN. CONCLUSION: Reduction of IS is probably an effective therapeutic option to clear viremia and prevent BKVN in viremic renal transplant patients.     

Treatment of Refractory BK Virus-Associated Nephropathy With Cidofovir

BK virus-associated nephropathy (BKVN) has become recognized as an important cause of allograft dysfunction in renal transplant recipients and despite reduction in immunosuppression, 30-40% of recipients ultimately progress to allograft loss. Cidofovir is an antiviral agent that demonstrates in vitro activity against murine polyomavirus and has been proposed for treatment of BKVN in renal allograft recipients. We describe the clinical course, renal function, serial renal histology and urine and blood viral load measurements in two consecutive patients with refractory BKVN who were treated with low-dose cidofovir (0.25 mg/kg IV). In each case, renal dysfunction and BK viral load progressed despite reduced immunosuppression, and persistent BK virus infection was documented in serial renal allograft biopsy specimens. Administration of low-dose cidofovir was associated with clearance of BK virus DNA from blood and allograft, and stabilization of renal function in both patients, without significant toxicity. These preliminary data suggest that low-dose cidofovir may be tolerated, even among renal transplant recipients with significant renal dysfunction due to BKVN. Prospective, controlled trials are warranted to further define the optimal dose, toxicity and potential role of cidofovir in renal transplant recipients with BK virus nephropathy.     

Prevalence and clinical course of BK virus nephropathy in pancreas after kidney transplant patients

The influence of BK virus nephropathy (BKVN) in pancreas after kidney (PAK) transplantation is unclear. A retrospective analysis of PAK transplants performed at our center was conducted to determine the impact of BKVN. Among 40 PAK transplants performed using sequential immunosuppression, four patients developed BKVN, as defined by a >20% rise in serum creatinine and BK viremia (BK plasma load >4 log copies/mL), at a median of 19 months following PAK. In all four patients, treatment of BKVN consisted of reduction in tacrolimus, cessation of mycophenolate mofetil, and introduction of leflunomide. With this approach, two patients experienced improvement or stabilization of renal function. The remaining two patients progressed to dialysis dependence despite treatment. Plasma BK load < or =5 log copies/mL was associated with graft preservation. Gender, age, delay between transplants, cumulative Thymoglobulin dose, and type of kidney donor were not associated with BK virus infection. Pancreas graft rejection or dysfunction was not observed with the above immunosuppression modification. Mean amylase and lipase > or =6 months following BKVN treatment remained normal. BKVN is an important cause of kidney allograft loss in PAK patients. Screening and early treatment of BKVN may enable preservation of kidney and pancreas grafts.     

BK virus nephropathy in renal transplant recipients in Kuwait: a preliminary report

INTRODUCTION: BK virus nephropathy (BKVN) is a significant cause of graft loss among renal transplant recipients. The treatment outcomes of BKVN have been variably reported in the literature. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We prospectively investigated BKV infection and BKVN among a population of renal transplant recipients with suspected BKV infection. The 42 subjects who all had acute allograft dysfunction, were categorized in three groups: those with clinical, laboratory, and histological findings that did not suggest acute rejection, drug toxicity, or obstruction (group 1, n = 24); those with findings that suggested probable acute cellular rejection but did not respond to antirejection treatment (group 2, n = 10); and those whose renal histology suggested BKVN (group 3, n = 8). Polymerase chain reaction analysis was done to detect BKV DNA in urine and blood samples from each subject. BKV DNA was detected in 19 (45%) urine samples with 11 of these subjects (26.1% of total) having BK viremia as well. RESULTS: No evidence of BKVN was detected histologically in seven subjects with isolated BK viruria, while the others proved to be JC virus infections. Among the 11 subjects with BK viremia, eight had BKVN based on renal histology at the time of diagnosis with BKV infection, while the other three subsequently developed histological features of BKVN. BKVN developed after 5.3 +/- 2.5 (2 to 44) months after transplantation. The serum creatinine at time of BKVN diagnosis was 158.9 +/- 58 (87 to 285) micromol/L. All subjects were initially treated with a 50% reduction in immunosuppressive drug doses. Further decreases in immunosuppression were performed in all patients with close monitoring of renal function. All subjects were followed up for a of 18.2 +/- 5 (12 to 26) months. Two grafts were lost not due to BKVN, and one patient was lost to follow-up during this period. The latest serum creatinine in eight recipients is 113 + 20 (81 to 138) micromol/L, which is better than the renal function at diagnosis. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of BKVN in suspected BKV infection was 26%. Although the study period was short (30 months), BK viremia strongly correlated with BKVN, which seemed to be successfully treated with reduction in immunosuppression.     

Long-term pancreatic allograft survival after renal retransplantation in prior simultaneous pancreas-kidney recipients

Over a 23-year period, our center performed 82 renal retransplants in prior simultaneous pancreas-kidney recipients with functioning pancreatic allografts. All patients were insulin-independent at retransplantation. We aimed to quantify the risk of returning to insulin therapy and to identify factors that predispose patients to pancreatic allograft failure after renal retransplantation. Among these 82 patients, pancreatic allograft survival after renal retransplantation was 78%, 49% and 40% at 1, 5 and 10 years. When analyzing risk factors, we unexpectedly found no clear relationship between the cause of primary renal allograft failure, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) or fasting C-peptide level at retransplant and subsequent pancreatic allograft failure. An elevated HbA1c in the month after renal retransplant correlated with subsequent pancreatic graft loss and patients experiencing pancreatic graft loss were more likely to subsequently lose their renal retransplant. Although it is difficult to prospectively identify those patients who will return to insulin therapy after repeat renal transplantation, the relatively high frequency of this event mandates that this risk be conveyed to patients. Nonetheless, the survival benefit associated with renal retransplantation justifies pursuing retransplantation in this population.     

Reactivation of BK Virus in the Early Period After Kidney Transplantation

Background

Typically, polyoma BK virus (BKV) remains latent in the urogenital tract after primary infection. Reactivation of BKV in recipients of kidney allografts can cause progressive graft dysfunction known as BK virus nephropathy (BKVN). The cornerstone of treatment for BKVN is prevention; therefore, it is important to detect BKV reactivation early and reduce immunosuppression. We sought to identify the BKV reactivation rate and associated factors in a prospective study.

Materials and Methods

We studied 37 consecutive unselected adult recipients who underwent deceased donor kidney transplantation in 2007 and completed at least 3 months of observation. Qualitative nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing was performed to detect BKV DNA in urine and plasma specimens.

Results

In all cases, BK viremia or viruria was not detected on the postoperative day or 2 weeks thereafter. At 3 months, BKV reactivation developed in 6 (16%) of 37 recipients. Simultaneous viremia and viruria were present on 5 patients and viremia only in 1 patient. Significant risk factors for BK viremia were body mass index >30 kg/m² (P = .02), retransplantation (P =.04), and use of tacrolimus (P = .02). Serum creatinine values at 3 months after transplantation were significantly higher among patients with active BKV infection (P = .008).

Conclusions

Early BKV reactivation is associated with worse graft function as early as 3 months after transplantation. Obesity, retransplantation, and use of tacrolimus were factors promoting early development of BKV viremia.     

Clinical Prognosis of Renal Retransplant Patients: A Single-Center Experience

BackgroundRetransplantation is a treatment option in patients with end-stage renal failure due to graft loss. Outcomes of these patients due to high immunologic risk remain unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes of renal retransplantation patients retrospectively.MethodsRenal retransplant patients in our unit were evaluated retrospectively between 2010 and 2018. Patients’ demographic characteristics, primary diseases, the causes of prior graft loss, immunologic status, desensitization protocols, the induction and maintenance treatments, the complications during the follow-up period, numbers of acute rejections, and the clinical prognosis were all detected from the patients’ files.ResultsWe retrospectively evaluated 17 patients who underwent a second or third renal allograft. Of these, 16 received a second and the remaining 1 patient received a third renal allograft. Immunologically, all of the 17 patients had negative flow cytometry crossmatch, 1 patient had a positive complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch (Auto 12%), 16 patients had positive panel reactive antibody, the median HLA-mismatch was 3.5, and the score of donor-specific antibody relative intensity score (RIS) was 6.4 ± 6.3. Ten pretransplant patients had desensitization treatment. While scores for HLA-MM and HLA-RIS in the patients who had a desensitization therapy were determined higher, no statistical difference was observed (respectively, P = .28 and .55). No acute rejection episode developed. BK virus DNA viremia was detected in 4 patients during the posttransplant 6th month. We observed no patient death or no graft loss during the follow-up period.ConclusionAlthough the retransplant patients who had a graft loss previously have high immunologic risks, retransplantation is reliable in these patients, but they should be followed up carefully in terms of BKV nephropathy.     

Heart Retransplantation

Retransplants comprise only a small minority (3-4%) of heart transplants, however outcome following retransplantation is compromised. Risk factors for a poor outcome following retransplantation include retransplantation early (<6 months) after primary transplant, retransplantation for acute rejection or early allograft failure, and retransplantation in an earlier era. The incidence of rejection and infection is similar following primary transplant and retransplantation. The compromised outcomes and risk factors for a poor outcome are similar in adult and pediatric heart retransplantation. However, due to the short half-life of the transplanted heart, it is an expectation that patients transplanted in childhood may require retransplantation. Based on the data available and the opinion of the working group, indications for heart retransplantation are (i) chronic severe cardiac allograft vasculopathy with symptoms of ischemia or heart failure (should be considered) or asymptomatic moderate or severe left ventricular dysfunction (may be considered) or (ii) chronic graft dysfunction with symptoms of progressive heart failure in the absence of active rejection. Patients with graft failure due to acute rejection with hemodynamic compromise, especially <6 months post-transplant, are inappropriate candidates for retransplantation. In addition, guidelines established for primary transplant candidacy should be strictly followed.     

BK polyoma virus nephropathy among Iranian renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: BK virus nephropathy (BKVN) is recognized as a cause of graft loss in renal transplant patients. The disorder may be related to the introduction of new, potent immunosuppressive regimens. We sought to assess the prevalence, outcome, and clinical characteristics of BKVN. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 160 specimens from episode biopsies. BKVN was diagnosed by light microscopic examination and positive immunohistochemical staining. RESULTS: Among 160 patients, 21 (13.1%) were diagnosed as BKVN. The mean interval between biopsy and transplantation was 13.6 +/- 10.67 months. There were no significant differences between BKVN patients and non-BKVN patients with respect to age, sex, interval between diagnosis and transplantation, cyclosporine blood level, and azathioprine versus mycophenolate mofetil immunosuppression. Graft loss occurred in 57.1% of BKVN versus 12.2% of non-BKVN subjects (P = .005). There was a significant difference between antilymphocyte globulin (ALG)- and non-ALG-treated groups with respect to the incidence of BKVN (6.6% in non-ALG versus 19% in ALG groups; P < .01). BKVN was diagnosed by immunohistochemistry in 61% of specimens with acute rejection according to light microscopic evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report of BKVN in Iranian renal allograft recipients. In our hospital, the prevalence of BKVN was higher than that previously reported for non-Iranian recipients. BKVN had a negative impact on graft survival.     

The Banff 2009 Working Proposal for Polyomavirus Nephropathy: A Critical Evaluation of Its Utility as a Determinant of Clinical Outcome

Clinical outcome in BK virus nephropathy (BKVN) was examined in relation to clinical and histologic parameters with reference to the Banff Working Proposal 2009, which emphasizes tubular injury and viral load. Seventy one patients were evaluated in three eras: (i) Era‐I: No BKV PCR performed (n = 36), (ii) Era‐II: PCR performed for rising creatinine (n = 24) and (iii) Era III: PCR performed for routine screening (n = 11). Six of seventy‐one (8.4%) patients were classified as Class A, 46/71 (64.8%) as Class B and 19/71 (26.8%) as Class C. Banff class A never occurred in Era‐I. It is a heterogeneous class that includes biopsies with inflammation that have hitherto been included in Class B. Higher inflammation, but not tubular injury, nor histologic viral load correlated with worse creatinine at 3 months. On long‐term follow‐up, class C associated with graft loss (hazard ratio 2.45, p = 0.03). Clearance of viremia was associated with better graft survival at 5 years (46.0% vs. 25.0%). Viruria clearance was infrequent (15.6%). In conclusion, the clinical utility of the Banff Working Proposal 2009 derives from scoring of fibrosis and not extent of tubular injury or viral cytopathic effect. The proposal is not superior to existing schemas that include assessment of inflammation, which is a well‐known prognostic marker in other renal allograft diseases.     

Polyomavirus Nephropathy in Pediatric Kidney Transplant Recipients

Given the limited information regarding BK virus-associated nephropathy (BKVN) in pediatric kidney transplant recipients, we assessed the incidence, risk factors, clinical and virologic features of BKVN in pediatric renal transplant recipients at a single transplant center by means of a retrospective cohort study. Histologically confirmed BKVN developed in 6 of 173 (3.5%) kidney transplant recipients at a median of 15 months post-transplant (range: 4-47 months). At a median follow-up of 28 months (range: 5-32), all patients had functioning grafts with mean creatinine and GFR of 1.9 mg/dL and 58 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively. At the time of diagnosis, all cases had viruria (median 6.1 x 10(6) copies/mL, range: 10(5) to 3.9 x 10(8) copies/mL) and viremia (median 21,000 copies/mL, range: 10,000-40,000 copies/mL). Recipient seronegativity for BKV was significantly associated with the development of BKVN (p = 0.01). BKVN is an important cause of late allograft dysfunction and is strongly associated with recipient seronegativity in pediatric kidney transplant recipients. Further studies to confirm this finding and to define the clinical utility of routine pre-transplant BKV serologic testing are warranted.     

Immediate Retransplantation for Pancreas Allograft Thrombosis

Early pancreas allograft failure most commonly results from thrombosis and requires immediate allograft pancreatectomy. Optimal timing for retransplantation remains undefined. Immediate retransplantation facilitates reuse of the same anatomic site before extensive adhesions have formed. Some studies suggest that early retransplantation is associated with a higher incidence of graft loss. This study is a retrospective review of immediate pancreas retransplants performed at a single center. All cases of pancreas allograft loss within 2 weeks were examined. Of 228 pancreas transplants, 12 grafts were lost within 2 weeks of surgery. Eleven of these underwent allograft pancreatectomy for thrombosis. One suffered anoxic brain injury and was not a retransplantation candidate, one was retransplanted at 3.5 months and nine patients underwent retransplantation 1–16 days following the original transplant. Of the nine early retransplants, one pancreas was lost to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, one recipient died with function at 2.9 years and the other grafts continue to function at 76–1137 days (mean 572 days). One-year graft survival for early retransplantation was 89% compared to 91% for all pancreas transplants at our center. Immediate retransplantation following pancreatic graft thrombosis restores durable allograft function with outcomes comparable to first-time pancreas transplantation.     

Kidney retransplantation in children following rejection and recurrent disease

Retransplantation accounts for approximately 15 % of the annual transplants performed in the USA, and in the recent International Collaborative Transplant Study report on pediatric patients 15.2 % of the 9209 patients included in the report were retransplant recipients. Although the significant advances in clinical management and newer immunosuppressive agents have had a significant impact on improving short-term allograft function, it is apparent that long-term allograft function remains suboptimal. Therefore, it is likely that the majority of pediatric renal allograft recipients will require one or more retransplants during their lifetime. Unfortunately, a second or subsequent graft in pediatric recipients has inferior long-term graft survival rates compared to initial grafts, with decreasing rates with each subsequent graft. Multiple issues influence the outcome of retransplantation, with the most significant being the cause of the prior transplant failure. Non-adherence-associated graft loss poses unresolved ethical issues that may impact access to retransplantation. Graft nephrectomy prior to retransplantation may benefit selected patients, but the impact of an in situ failed graft on the development of panel-reactive antibodies remains to be definitively determined. It is important that these and other factors discussed in this review be taken into consideration during the counseling of families on the optimal approach for their child who requires a retransplant.     

BK virus nephropathy: Clinical experience in a university hospital in Japan

Objectives: To review the medical records of patients with BK virus nephropathy (BKVN) following kidney transplantation in our institution. Methods: We screened patients for decoy cells using urine cytology, assessed serum creatinine levels, and conducted a graft biopsy, as well as assessed the presence of plasma BK virus DNA by quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction. The treatment of BKVN was based on the decreased use of immunosuppressants. Results: Overall, six male patients were studied (mean age 40.8 years, range 18–58; mean donor age 45.2 years, range 15–67). A positive urine cytology screen led to the subsequent detection of plasma BK virus DNA in the five patients with urine cytology results positive for decoy cells. In the four patients in whom plasma BK virus DNA was detected, a maximum value of DNA of ≥10 000 copies/mL was observed. Time elapsed from transplantation to BKVN diagnosis ranged from 3 to 62 months. Although the two cadaver grafts were lost, the loss was not due to any effects directly associated with BKVN. The other four grafts are still functioning with a mean creatinine level of 1.8 mg/dL. Most of the patients with BKVN were regarded as being in a state of heightened immunosuppression. BK virus transition to blood was prevented in one patient. Conclusions: Early diagnosis of BKV infection with reduction of immunosuppression may potentially counter BK viremia and retard progression of BKV nephropathy. Decoy cell screening by urine cytology as well as plasma BK virus DNA screening should be considered in addition to the required graft biopsy in kidney transplant recipients, particularly in those with impaired graft function.     

Impact of failed allograft nephrectomy on initial function and graft survival after kidney retransplantation

The management of an asymptomatic failed renal graft remains controversial. The aim of our study was to explore the effect of failed allograft nephrectomy on kidney retransplantation by comparing the outcome of recipients who underwent graft nephrectomy prior to retransplantation with those who did not. Retrospective comparison of patients undergoing kidney retransplantation with (group A, n = 121) and without (group B, n = 45) preliminary nephrectomy was performed, including subgroup analysis with reference to patients with multiple (≥2) retransplantations and patients of the European Senior Program (ESP). Nephrectomy leads to increased panel reactive antibody (PRA) levels prior to retransplantation and is associated with significantly increased rates of primary nonfunction (PNF; P = 0.05) and acute rejection (P = 0.04). Overall graft survival after retransplantation was significantly worse in group A compared with group B (P = 0.03). Among the subgroups especially ESP patients showed a shorter graft survival after previous allograft nephrectomy. On the multivariate analysis, pretransplant graft nephrectomy and PRA >70% were independent and significant risk factors associated with graft loss after kidney retransplantation. Nephrectomy of the failed allograft was not beneficial for retransplant outcome in our series. Patients with failed graft nephrectomy tended to have a higher risk of PNF and acute rejection after retransplantation. The possibility that the graft nephrectomy has a negative impact on graft function and survival after retransplantation is worth studying further.     

Renal allograft loss as the result of polyomavirus interstitial nephritis after simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation: results with kidney retransplantation

BACKGROUND: Polyomavirus (PV) infection in kidney transplant patients has been reported to cause interstitial nephritis and subsequent graft loss. The cornerstone of current therapy is a reduction in immunosuppression, which can subsequently lead to kidney allograft rejection. This dilemma becomes even more challenging in the setting of simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation, because a reduction in immunosuppression may result in rejection of the pancreas allograft. Antiviral therapy has not been shown to be clinically successful in decreasing the risk of graft loss secondary to PV infection. Furthermore, because of limited experience, the decision to perform retransplantation in patients who lost their primary kidney grafts to PV interstitial nephritis becomes a difficult one. METHODS: Retrospective review and case studies. RESULTS: We report two successful living donor kidney retransplants in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant patients who lost their first kidney grafts to PV infection. Both patients are receiving rimantadine therapy and performing well, with functioning kidney and pancreas grafts and no evidence of recurrent PV interstitial nephritis 22 and 37 months after retransplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Although follow-up is limited, our initial experience would indicate that graft loss secondary to PV interstitial nephritis is not an absolute contraindication for kidney retransplantation.     

BK virus nephropathy in simultaneous pancreas kidney transplant: a potentially preventable cause of kidney allograft loss

More than half of the simultaneous pancreas kidney transplant (SPK) patients afflicted with BK virus nephropathy (BKVN) lose their kidney allograft. Fear of pancreatic rejection limits the ability to reduce immunosuppression; this may result in inadequate treatment of BKVN. This single-center retrospective review included 138 SPK patients who underwent periodic BKV screening and were managed with IS reduction alone as a treatment of choice for BKVN. All patients underwent rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG) induction and were maintained on tacrolimus/sirolimus or mycophenolate. The incidence of BKVN was 4.4%. BKVN was diagnosed at a median of 11 months; mean serum creatinine 2.1 mg/dL and the geometric mean BK serum viral load at diagnosis 1,758,000 DNA copies/mL. Median time to BKV clearance was 5.6 months; there was 96% reduction in the mycophenolate dose, 100% reduction in sirolimus, and 40% reduction in the tacrolimus blood level at BKVN clearance. No BKVN-related kidney failure was noted, and patients retained excellent kidney and pancreatic allograft function till last follow-up (43 months). BKVN in SPK is a potentially preventable cause of end-stage kidney disease, and IS reduction alone is an acceptable treatment modality in SPK without a higher risk of kidney/pancreas allograft loss as long as close monitoring can be ensured.