Synergistic toughening effect of chlorinated polyethylene and acrylic resin on SAN/ASA blends at low temperature

Styrene–acrylonitrile copolymer (SAN)/acrylonitrile–styrene–acrylate terpolymer (ASA) blends (75/25, w/w) were toughened by blending with chlorinated polyethylene (CPE) and acrylic resin (ACR) at three different temperatures (?30, 0, and 25 °C). When the testing temperature was 0 and 25 °C, CPE played a key role in improving the impact strength of blends instead of ACR. However, an obvious synergistic toughening effect of CPE and ACR was observed at ?30 °C: when both 10 phr CPE and 15 phr ACR were added, the impact strength of the blends reached a peak at 7.50 kJ/m², which was about two to three times higher than when 25 phr CPE or 25 phr ACR was introduced into the blends individually. Scanning electron microscopy, dynamic mechanical analysis, and surface energy measurements were used to investigate the toughening mechanism. Furthermore, other mechanical properties and the heat distortion temperatures were evaluated. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016 , 133, 43958.     

Room temperature and low temperature toughness improvement in SAN/ASA blends by blending with CPE,HNBR, and BR

Styrene‐acrylonitrile copolymer (SAN)/acrylonitrile‐styrene‐acrylate terpolymer (ASA) blends (75/25, wt/wt) was toughened by blending with impact modifiers including chlorinated polyethylene (CPE), hydrogenated nitrile butadiene rubber (HNBR), and butadiene rubber (BR) and the impact property was tested at four temperatures (–30, ?15, 0, and 25 °C). The combination of CPE and HNBR was imported to toughen the SAN/ASA blends, indicating that CPE and HNBR had similar toughening effect at room temperature but HNBR exhibited a better performance at low temperature. When a little HNBR was substituted by BR, the impact strength improved dramatically with the total content of impact modifiers keeping at 30 phr. After 15 phr CPE, 10 phr HNBR and 5 phr BR were employed into blends together, the impact strength reached to a peak of 14 kJ/m² at ?30 °C while the impact strength of the blends individually toughened by 30 phr CPE or 30 phr HNBR was 5 or 12 kJ/m², respectively. The toughening mechanism showed that the low glass‐transition temperature (–108 °C) of BR and the compatibilization between BR and matrix accounted for the improvement of toughness. Simultaneously, scanning electron microscopy, dynamic mechanical analysis, flexural and tensile properties, heat distortion temperature, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy were measured. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2017 , 134 , 45364.     

Improvement in Low Temperature Izod Impact Strength of SAN/ASA/HNBR Ternary Blends Considering Competing Effects of Glass Transition Temperature and Compatibility

The competing effects of glass transition temperature (T_g) and compatibility on the low temperature Izod impact toughness of styrene–acrylonitrile copolymer/acrylonitrile–styrene‐acrylate terpolymer (SAN/ASA, 75/25, w/w) blends were investigated by using a series of hydrogenated nitrile butadiene rubbers (HNBRs) with different acrylonitrile (AN) contents. The results showed that the HNBR with AN mass content ranging from 21% to 43% had good compatibility with polymer matrix and exhibited dramatic toughening effect at 25°C. Owing to their low T_gs, only the HNBRs (AN = 21% and 25%) remained favorable toughening effect at 0 and ?30°C, respectively. Furthermore, the HNBR with 0% AN content was represented by butadiene rubber (BR). Although, BR has an extremely low T_g (?94.5°C), it is incompatible with polymer matrix, and then could not toughen the material at three temperatures (?30, 0, and 25°C, respectively). Various characterizations including solubility parameters, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), dynamic mechanical thermal analysis (DMTA), Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, and so on were carried out to elucidate the toughening mechanism. J. VINYL ADDIT. TECHNOL., 25:225–235, 2019. © 2018 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Effect of the addition of acrylonitrile/ethylene–propylene–diene monomer (EPDM)/styrene graft copolymer on the morphology–properties relationships in poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile)/EPDM rubber blends

Blends of poly(styrene‐co‐acylonitrile) (SAN) with ethylene–propylene–diene monomer (EPDM) rubber were investigated. An improved toughness–stiffness balance of the SAN/EPDM blend was obtained when an appropriate amount of acrylonitrile–EPDM–styrene (AES) graft copolymer was added, prepared by grafting EPDM with styrene–acrylonitrile copolymer, and mixed thoroughly with both of the two components of the blend. Morphological observations indicated a finer dispersion of the EPDM particles in the SAN/EPDM/AES blends, and particle size distribution became narrower with increasing amounts of AES. Meanwhile, it was found that the SAN/EPDM blend having a ratio of 82.5/17.5 by weight was more effective in increasing the impact strength than that of the 90/10 blend. From dynamic mechanic analysis of the blends, the glass‐transition temperature of the EPDM‐rich phase increased from ?53.9 to ?46.2°C, even ?32.0°C, for the ratio of 82.5/17.5 blend of SAN/EPDM, whereas that of the SAN‐rich phase decreased from 109.2 to 108.6 and 107.5°C with the additions of 6 and 10% AES copolymer contents, respectively. It was confirmed that AES graft copolymer is an efficient compatibilizer for SAN/EPDM blend. The compatibilizer plays an important role in connecting two phases and improving the stress transfer in the blends. Certain morphological features such as thin filament connecting and even networking of the dispersed rubber phase may contribute to the overall ductility of the high impact strength of the studied blends. Moreover, its potential to induce a brittle–ductile transition of the glassy SAN matrix is considered to explain the toughening mechanism. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 91: 1685–1697, 2004     

Toughness,dynamic mechanical property,and morphology of polyvinylchloride/acrylonitrile‐styrene‐butyl acrylate blends

Acrylonitrile‐styrene‐butyl acrylate (ASA) graft copolymers with different acrylonitrile (AN) contents, the core‐shell ratio, and tert‐dodecyl mercaptan (TDDM) amounts were synthesized by seed emulsion polymerization. Polyvinylchloride (PVC)/ASA blends were prepared by melt blending ASA graft copolymers with PVC resin. Then the toughness, dynamic mechanical property, and morphology of the PVC/ASA blends were investigated. The results indicated that the impact strength of the PVC/ASA blends increased and then decreased with the increase of the AN content in poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile (SAN) copolymer, and increased with the increase of the core‐shell ratio of ASA. It was shown that brittle‐ductile transition of PVC/ASA blends was dependent on poly(butyl acrylate) (PBA) rubber content in blends and independent of AN content in SAN copolymer. The introduction of TDDM made the toughness of PVC/ASA blends poor. Dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) curves exhibited that PVC and SAN copolymers were immiscible over the entire AN composition range. From scanning electron microscopy (SEM), it was found that the dispersion of ASA in PVC/ASA blends was dependent on the AN content in SAN copolymer and TDDM amounts. J. VINYL ADDIT. TECHNOL., 22:43–50, 2016. © 2014 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Influence of acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene (ABS) morphology and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (SAN) content on fracture behavior of ABS/SAN blends

This study attempted to correlate morphological changes and physical properties for a high rubber content acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene (ABS) and its diluted blends with a poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (SAN) copolymer. The results showed a close relationship between rubber content and fracture toughness for the blends. The change of morphology in ABS/SAN blends explains in part some deviations in fracture behavior observed in ductile–brittle transition temperature shifts. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 92: 2606–2611, 2004     

Toughening modification of (Acrylonitrile‐styrene‐acrylic copolymer)/(α‐Methylstyrene‐acrylonitrile copolymer) binary blend via using different impact modifiers

In this work, different impact modifiers such as acrylic resin impact modifier, chlorinated polyethylene (CPE), nitrile rubber, powdered nitrile rubber, and hydrogenated nitrile rubber, were chosen to improve the toughness of (acrylonitrile‐styrene‐acrylic copolymer)/(α‐methylstyrene‐acrylonitrile copolymer) (ASA/α‐MSAN) binary blend. The blend ratios of the ASA/(α‐MSAN)/(impact modifier) ternary system were 30/70/20 and 70/30/20 by mass, respectively. The results showed that the impact strength significantly increased, nearly 30 times (22.59 kJ·m^?2, 22.26 kJ·m^?2, and 25.24 kJ·m^?2) compared with that of control samples (0.80 kJ·m^?2) when nitrile rubber, powdered nitrile rubber, or hydrogenated nitrile rubber was added to the ASA/(α‐MSAN) (30/70) matrix, respectively. Moreover, the impact strength of ASA/(α‐MSAN) (70/30) was dramatically enhanced to 46 kJ·m^?2 with the addition of 20 parts by weight per hundred parts of resin of chlorinated polyethylene. The toughness of ASA/(α‐MSAN) with or without impact modifiers was also characterized via fracture energy calculated from stress‐strain curves. The results were perfectly consistent with that of impact strength. The results of dynamic mechanical analysis demonstrated the existence of α‐MSAN (glass transition temperature at approximately 140°C). The heat distortion temperature was barely changed, indicating the addition of impact modifiers barely affects the heat resistance. J. VINYL ADDIT. TECHNOL., 22:326–335, 2016. © 2014 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Properties of ASA/SAN/NBR ternary blends: effect of AN content in NBR

Abstract

Nitrile–butadiene rubbers (NBRs) with different acrylonitrile (AN) contents were used to toughen acrylonitrile–styrene–acrylic terpolymer/styrene–acrylonitrile copolymer (ASA/SAN) blends. The properties of the ASA/SAN/NBR ternary blends were investigated via dynamic mechanical analysis, heat distortion temperature, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The effects of AN content in NBR on physical properties, heat resistance and morphology of the ternary blends were studied. Heat distortion temperature of the blends decreased with increasing AN content of NBR. The impact strength reached the maximum value when 20 phr NBR with 26 wt-%AN content was added. Images (SEM) were in accordance with results of mechanical properties.     

Effect of compatibilizer in acrylonitrile‐butadiene‐styrene toughened nylon 6 blends: Ductile–brittle transition temperature

The ductile–brittle transition temperatures were determined for compatibilized nylon 6/acrylonitrile‐butadiene‐styrene (PA6/ABS) copolymer blends. The compatibilizers used for those blends were methyl methacrylate‐co‐maleic anhydride (MMA‐MAH) and MMA‐co‐glycidyl methacrylate (MMA‐GMA). The ductile–brittle transition temperatures were found to be lower for blends compatibilized through maleate modified acrylic polymers. At room temperature, the PA6/ABS binary blend was essentially brittle whereas the ternary blends with MMA‐MAH compatibilizer were supertough and showed a ductile–brittle transition temperature at ?10°C. The blends compatibilized with maleated copolymer exhibited impact strengths of up to 800 J/m. However, the blends compatibilized with MMA‐GMA showed poor toughness at room temperature and failed in a brittle manner at subambient temperatures. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 90: 2643–2647, 2003     

Effects of styrene–acrylonitrile contents on the properties of ABS/SAN blends for fused deposition modeling

This paper was to assess the effects of styrene–acrylonitrile (SAN) contents on the glass transition temperature (T_g), melt flow index (MFI), and mechanical properties of acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene (ABS)/SAN blends for fused deposition modeling (FDM) process. The addition of SAN had little effects on T_g but could decrease the MFI and elongation at break while improving the tensile strength and modulus of ABS/SAN blends. For both longitudinal direction and transverse direction FDM printed specimens, the incorporation of SAN improved mechanical properties without sacrificing dimensional stability. This result was mainly attributed to the increasing content of continuous phase (SAN phase) and improvement in adhesion quality. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2017 , 134, 44477.     

Effects of the polybutadiene/poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) ratio in a polybutadiene‐g‐poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) impact modifier on the morphology and mechanical behavior of acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene blends

Polybutadiene‐g‐poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (PB‐g‐SAN) impact modifiers with different polybutadiene (PB)/poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (SAN) ratios ranging from 20.5/79.5 to 82.7/17.3 were synthesized by seeded emulsion polymerization. Acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene (ABS) blends with a constant rubber concentration of 15 wt % were prepared by the blending of these PB‐g‐SAN copolymers and SAN resin. The influence of the PB/SAN ratio in the PB‐g‐SAN impact modifier on the mechanical behavior and phase morphology of ABS blends was investigated. The mechanical tests showed that the impact strength and yield strength of the ABS blends had their maximum values as the PB/SAN ratio in the PB‐g‐SAN copolymer increased. A dynamic mechanical analysis of the ABS blends showed that the glass‐transition temperature of the rubbery phase shifted to a lower temperature, the maximum loss peak height of the rubbery phase increased and then decreased, and the storage modulus of the ABS blends increased with an increase in the PB/SAN ratio in the PB‐g‐SAN impact modifier. The morphological results of the ABS blends showed that the dispersion of rubber particle in the matrix and its internal structure were influenced by the PB/SAN ratio in the PB‐g‐SAN impact modifiers. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 98: 2165–2171, 2005     

Study of the phase morphology and toughness in poly (vinyl chloride)/acrylonitrile–styrene-acrylic/styrene–butadiene–styrene ternary blends influenced by interfacial/surface tension

The effect of interfacial interaction on the phase morphology and toughness of poly (vinyl chloride) (PVC)/acrylonitrile–styrene-acrylic (ASA) terpolymer/styrene–butadiene–styrene (SBS) block copolymer ternary blends has been investigated. Water and diiodomethane liquids were used for static contact angle measurements to get surface tension and calculate interfacial tension. A dispersed phase morphology of ASA and SBS in the PVC matrix was predicted by the spreading coefficient theory, which was calculated through interfacial tensions between different polymer pairs. Extraction experiment and scanning electron microscopy were combined to verify this morphology. When the volume fraction of SBS was small, SBS was dispersed in the matrix as droplets and the strong PVC/styrene–acrylonitrile interfacial interaction made up for the poor interfacial adhesion between SBS and PVC. Herein, SBS showed an effective toughening effect on PVC/ASA blends. With the addition of 2.5- and 5-phr SBS, the blends had the highest impact strength of 88.75 kJ/m² at 23 °C and 9.98 kJ/m² at 0 °C, respectively. With the further increase of the SBS content, the diameter of the SBS drops increased largely and the poor interfacial adhesion between SBS and PVC played a leading role, resulting in a sharp decrease in toughness and a sharp ductile–brittle transition. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2019 , 136, 47721.     

Mechanical and thermal properties of (acrylonitrile‐styrene‐acrylic)/(α‐methylstyrene‐acrylonitrile) binary blends

In this work, (acrylonitrile‐styrene‐acrylic)/(α‐methylstyrene‐acrylonitrile) copolymer (ASA/α‐MSAN) binary alloy was prepared with different composition ratios via melt blending. This work mainly focused on improving the heat resistance of ASA. According to the results of dynamic mechanical thermal analysis, the binary blends exhibited three glass transition temperatures (T_gs) and the shift of the T_gs indicated the partial miscibility of binary blends. This partial miscibility maintained the high T_g of α‐MSAN, which led to the outstanding heat resistance of binary blends. Furthermore, heat distortion temperature also showed that the heat resistance of binary blends was significantly enhanced with the addition of α‐MSAN. However, the introduction of this highly rigid polymer also brought with it the sharp decrease of the impact strength and elongation at break, which is reflected in the morphologies of the blend system obtained via scanning electron microscopy. In addition, the incorporation of α‐MSAN increased the tensile strength, flexural strength, and modulus. There were no new groups observed from Fourier‐transform infrared spectra, which means no strong specific intermolecular interactions existed between ASA and α‐MSAN. Moreover, the processibility of the blend system was obviously improved from the results of melt flow rate. J. VINYL ADDIT. TECHNOL., 22:156–162, 2016. © 2014 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Phase behavior of blends of poly(vinyl chloride) with an α-methyl styrene/acrylonitrile copolymer

Poly(vinyl chloride), PVC, is shown to be miscible with an α-methyl styrene/acrylonitrile copolymer, αMSAN, containing 30 percent AN by weight using differential scanning calorimetry for blends prepared by several methods. Melt blending gave single T_g mixtures; whereas, solution techniques gave results that depended on the solvent choice and the manner in which it was removed. These blends do not phase separate on heating prior to significant PVC decomposition (～250°C) in contrast to PVC/SAN blends which have much lower cloud points. Repulsion between α-methyl styrene and acrylonitrile units in the copolymer is the principal cause for miscibility of this system as shown by an analysis based on a binary interaction model using calorimetry data for low molecular weight liquid analog compounds.     

Influence of acrylic content in PBA‐SAN on the mechanical properties of PBA‐SAN and PBA‐SAN/SAN blends

The effects of different acrylic rubber (PBA) contents in core‐shell structured rubbery acrylate‐g‐poly (styrene‐acrylonitrile) (PBA‐SAN) on the mechanical properties of PBA‐SAN and PBA‐SAN/SAN blends were systematically investigated. Fourier transform‐infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and scanning electron microscope (SEM) were used to characterize the structure and morphology of PBA‐SAN and PBA‐SAN/SAN blends, respectively. It was found that the mechanical properties of PBA‐SAN and PBA‐SAN/SAN blends strongly depended on the PBA content: largely improved impact strength and elongation at break were observed when adding PBA‐SAN with high PBA content. However, the loss in rigidity and heat distortion temperature were accompanied. Specifically, both PBA‐SAN and PBA‐SAN/SAN blends with 60 wt% PBA exhibited a good balance between toughness and rigidity, which indicating PBA‐SAN with 60 wt% PBA was the most suitable impact modifier. J. VINYL ADDIT. TECHNOL., 24:262–267, 2018. © 2016 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Application of styrene‐acrylonitrile random copolymer–polyarylate block copolymer as reactive compatibilizer for polyamide and acrylonitrile‐butadiene‐styrene blends

Styrene‐acrylonitrile random copolymer (SAN) and polyarylate (PAr) block copolymer were applied as a reactive compatibilizer for polyamide‐6 (PA‐6)/acrylonitrile‐butadiene‐styrene (ABS) copolymer blends. The SAN–PAr block copolymer was found to be effective for compatibilization of PA‐6/ABS blends. With the addition of 3.0–5.0 wt % SAN–PAr block copolymer, the ABS‐rich phase could be reduced to a smaller size than 1.0 μm in the 70/30 and 50/50 PA‐6/ABS blends, although it was several microns in the uncompatibilized blends. As a result, for the blends compatibilized with 3–5 wt % block copolymer the impact energy absorption reached the super toughness region in the 70/30 and 50/50 PA‐6/ABS compositions. The compatibilization mechanism of PA‐6/ABS by the SAN–PAr block copolymer was investigated by tetrahydrofuran extraction of the SAN–PAr block copolymer/PA‐6 blends and the model reactions between the block copolymer and low molecular weight compounds. The results of these experiments indicated that the SAN–PAr block copolymer reacted with the PA‐6 during the melt mixing process via an in situ transreaction between the ester units in the PAr chain and the terminal amine in the PA‐6. As a result, SAN–PAr/PA‐6 block copolymers were generated during the melt mixing process. The SAN–PAr block copolymer was supposed to compatibilize the PA‐6 and ABS blend by anchoring the PAr/PA‐6 and SAN chains to the PA‐6 and ABS phases, respectively. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 83: 2300–2313, 2002     

Thermal properties of blends of poly(hydroxybutyrate‐co‐hydroxyvalerate) and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile)

Thermal properties of blends of poly(hydroxybutyrate‐co‐hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV) and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (SAN) prepared by solution casting were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry. In the study of PHBV‐SAN blends by differential scanning calorimetry, glass transition temperature and melting point of PHBV in the PHBV‐SAN blends were almost unchanged compared with those of the pure PHBV. This result indicates that the blends of PHBV and SAN are immiscible. However, crystallization temperature of the PHBV in the blends decreased approximately 9–15°. From the results of the Avrami analysis of PHBV in the PHBV‐SAN blends, crystallization rate constant of PHBV in the PHBV‐SAN blends decreased compared with that of the pure PHBV. From the above results, it is suggested that the nucleation of PHBV in the blends is suppressed by the addition of SAN. From the measured crystallization half time and degree of supercooling, interfacial free energy for the formation of heterogeneous nuclei of PHBV in the PHBV‐SAN blends was calculated and found to be 2360 (mN/m)³ for the pure PHBV and 2920–3120 (mN/m)³ for the blends. The values of interfacial free energy indicate that heterogeneity of PHBV in the PHBV‐SAN blends is deactivated by the SAN. This result is consistent with the results of crystallization temperature and crystallization rate constant of PHBV in the PHBV‐SAN blends. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 77: 673–679, 2000     

Influence of ABS type on morphology and mechanical properties of PC/ABS blends

The morphology and the mechanical properties of polycarbonate (PC) blends with different acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene (ABS) materials were investigated. PC/ABS blends based on a mass-made ABS with 16% rubber and large (0.5–1μm) rubber particles are compared to blends based on an emulsion-made ABS with 50% rubber and small, monodisperse (0.12 μm) rubber particles over the full range of blend compositions. The blends with the bulk ABS showed excellent impact strength for most compositions, and those containing 50 and 70% PC exhibited ductile to brittle transition temperatures below that of PC. The blends with the emulsion ABS showed excellent toughness in sharp notch Izod impact tests at room temperature and in standard notch Izod impact tests at low temperatures near the T_g of the rubber. By melt blending the various ABS materials with a styrene–acrylonitrile (SAN 25) copolymer, materials with lower rubber concentrations were obtained. These materials were used in blends with PC to make comparisons at constant rubber concentration of 5, 10, and 15%. The results of this investigation show that brittle ABS materials can produce tough PC–ABS blends. It is apparent that small rubber particles toughen PC–ABS blends at lower rubber concentrations and at lower temperatures than is possible with large rubber particles. However, additional work is needed to understand the nature of toughening in these PC–ABS blends with different rubber phase morphologies. It is of particular interest to understand the exceptional ductility of some of the blends at low temperatures. © 1994 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Blends of bisphenol A polycarbonate and rubber‐toughened styrene–maleic anhydride copolymers

The morphology and mechanical properties of polycarbonate (PC) blends with rubber‐toughened styrene–maleic anhydride copolymer materials (TSMA) were investigated and compared with the properties of blends of PC with acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene (ABS) materials. The PC/TSMA blends showed similar composition dependence of properties as the comparable PC/ABS blends. Polycarbonate blends with TSMA exhibited higher notched Izod impact toughness than pure PC under sharp‐notched conditions but the improvements are somewhat less than observed for similar blends with ABS. Since PC is known for its impact toughness except under sharp‐notched conditions, this represents a significant advantage of the rubber‐modified blends. PC blends with styrene–maleic anhydride copolymer (SMA) were compared to those with a styrene–acrylonitrile copolymer (SAN). The trends in blend morphology and mechanical properties were found to be qualitatively similar for the two types of copolymers. PC/SMA blends are nearly transparent or slightly pearlescent. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 74: 1508–1515, 1999     

Changes in the interfacial properties of PC/SAN blends with compatibilizer

Block copolymers of polycarbonate‐b‐poly(methyl methacrylate) (PC‐b‐PMMA) and tetramethyl poly(carbonate)‐b‐poly(methyl methacrylate) (TMPC‐b‐PMMA) were examined as compatibilizers for blends of polycarbonate (PC) with styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile (SAN) copolymer. To explore the effects of block copolymers on the compatibility of PC/SAN blends, the average diameter of the dispersed particles in the blend was measured with an image analyzer, and the interfacial properties of the blends were analyzed with an imbedded fiber retraction (IFR) technique and an asymmetric double cantilever beam fracture test. The average diameter of dispersed particles and interfacial tension of the PC/SAN blends were reduced by adding compatibilizer to the PC/SAN blends. Fracture toughness of the blends was also improved by enhancing interfacial adhesion with compatibilizer. TMPC‐b‐PMMA copolymer was more effective than PC‐b‐PMMA copolymer as a compatibilizer for the PC/SAN blends. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 89: 2649–2656, 2003