Complications of vagal nerve stimulation for drug-resistant epilepsy: A single center longitudinal study of 143 patients

PurposeTo longitudinally study surgical and hardware complications to vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) treatment in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy.MethodsIn a longitudinal retrospective study, we analyzed surgical and hardware complications in 143 patients (81 men and 62 women) who between 1994 and 2010 underwent implantation of a VNS-device for drug-resistant epilepsy. The mean follow-up time was 62 ± 46 months and the total number of patient years 738.Results251 procedures were performed on 143 patients. 16.8% of the patients were afflicted by complications related to surgery and 16.8% suffered from hardware malfunctions. Surgical complications were: superficial infection in 3.5%, deep infection needing explantation in 3.5%, vocal cord palsy in 5.6%, which persisted in at least 0.7% for over one year, and other complications in 5.6%. Hardware-related complications were: lead fracture in 11.9% of patients, disconnection in 2.8%, spontaneous turn-off in 1.4% and stimulator malfunction in 1.4%. We noted a tendency to different survival times between the two most commonly used lead models as well as a tendency to increased infection rate with increasing number of stimulator replacements.ConclusionIn this series we report on surgical and hardware complications from our 16 years of experience with VNS treatment. Infection following insertion of the VNS device and vocal cord palsy due to damage to the vagus nerve are the most serious complications related to the surgery. Avoiding unnecessary reoperations in order to reduce the appearances of these complications are of great importance. It is therefore essential to minimize technical malfunctions that will lead to additional surgery. Further studies are needed to evaluate the possible superiority of the modified leads.     

Lead and Pulse Generator Migration After Spinal Cord Stimulation Implantation: Insights From an Analysis of 7322 Patients

ObjectivesLead migration (LM) after spinal cord stimulation (SCS) implantation surgery is the most common device-related complication. Our study of lead and implantable pulse generator (IPG) migration using a large administrative claims data base aims to understand rates, risk factors, and outcomes after SCS implantation.Materials and MethodsThis retrospective cohort study used the IBM® MarketScan® (Armonk, NY) Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Databases from 2016 to 2018. Adult patients who underwent SCS surgical procedures with at least 90 days of follow-up were identified using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT®) codes. Patients with LM and IPG migration after SCS surgery were identified using the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10 CM) codes. Patients who underwent revision surgery after SCS implantation were identified using the CPT codes and ICD-10 CM codes. In addition, patient characteristics associated with LM or IPG migration, the temporal relationship of migration diagnosis, and revision surgery were evaluated in the cohort. Continuous outcomes were compared between groups using the two-sample Student t-test. The Fisher exact test was used to compare categorical outcomes between groups.ResultsA total of 7322 patients (64.4% percutaneous SCS) underwent SCS surgery during the study period. A total of 141 patients (1.9%) had LM or IPG migration. Of those, 116 patients (1.6%) had LM only; 18 patients (0.2%) had IPG migration; and seven patients (0.1%) had LM and IPG migration. The mean duration for migration diagnosis after initial SCS implantation was 168 (±163.1) days. The mean duration to revision surgery after the migration diagnosis was 12.3 (±35.2) days only. Most patients with migration (105, 74.5%) underwent revision surgery. Only younger age (p = 0.02) was associated with migration in this study.ConclusionsLM and pulse generator migration that required revision surgery occurred in a small proportion of patients who underwent SCS surgical procedures.     

Men and Women Respond Equally Well to Spinal Cord and Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation

ObjectivesThe influence of gender on outcomes in individuals undergoing treatment for chronic pain is unclear. This retrospective, single-site study explored the impact of gender on pain, quality of life (QoL), revisions, and explants in patients with failed back surgery syndrome or visceral pain, who received a fully implanted 10 kHz spinal cord stimulation (SCS), burst SCS, or dorsal root ganglion (DRG) stimulation system.Materials and MethodsThe following data were collected from paper and electronic records: gender, age, chronic pain diagnosis, system, baseline and follow-up scores (average pain [visual analog scale, VAS], worst pain [VAS], QoL [EQ-5D-3L]), revisions, and explants. Data were statistically analyzed by one-way ANCOVAs controlling for age, chi-square tests of independence, and logistic regression.ResultsThe final sample comprised 387 patients (176 males and 211 females). Males were significantly older compared to females (mean difference: 2.33 years, p = 0.044). Controlling for age, baseline average pain was significantly lower in males than females (mean difference: ?0.32, p = 0.049). Males and females responded equally well to 10 kHz SCS and burst SCS as well as DRG stimulation. A greater percentage of males (5%) than females (1%) had revisions due to lead fractures. Additionally, more females (13%) than males (6%) had an explant due to insufficient pain relief. Female gender and older age were associated with greater likelihood of having an explant compared to male gender and younger age.ConclusionGender may play an influential role in pain severity at baseline but have little effect at follow-up. To help identify which patients may undergo a revision or explant, gender and age could be important factors and should be further scrutinized. Even though men and women responded equally well to SCS and DRG stimulation, more men had a revision due to lead fractures, and more women were explanted due to insufficient pain relief.     

Use of a Pericranial Flap Technique for Deep Brain Stimulation Hardware Protection and Improved Cosmesis

ObjectivesDeep brain stimulation (DBS) has become an established neuromodulation therapy; however, surgical site complications such as hardware skin erosion remain an important risk and can predispose to infection, requiring explantation of the system. Nuances of surgical technique can affect wound healing, cosmetic outcome, comfort, and risk of infection. In this study, we describe our experience with a layered closure technique using a vascularized pericranial flap for improving cosmesis and protection of the implanted hardware against skin erosion and infection.Materials and MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 636 individuals (746 lead implantations) who underwent DBS surgery by a single academic neurosurgeon between 2001 and 2020. A layered pericranial flap closure technique for the burr-hole and connector sites was instituted in 2015. We assessed the effects of a multimodal infection prevention approach that included the pericranial flap on hardware complication rates compared with the premultimodality cohort, and we report the nuances of the technique.ResultsIn our institutional experience, we found that implementation of a pericranial flap closure technique can enhance the subjective cosmetic result at the burr-hole cover site and increase patient comfort and satisfaction. In addition, we found a decrease in hardware infection rates in the current cohort with a multimodal infection prevention regimen that includes the pericranial-flap technique (n = 256, 2015–2020 period) to 1.2% (p = 0.006), from 6.9% in the earlier cohort (n = 490, 2001–2015 period).ConclusionsThe report highlights the potential of a pericranial-flap closure technique as a surgical adjunct to improve DBS surgical site healing and cosmesis and may, as part of a multimodal strategy, contribute to decreased risk of skin breakdown and hardware infection.     

Complications and Effects of Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation in the Treatment of Chronic Neuropathic Pain: A Nationwide Cohort Study in Denmark

ObjectivesDorsal root ganglion (DRG) stimulation is a novel treatment of chronic neuropathic pain and has been shown to be efficacious across several case reports and randomized trials. However, long-term follow-up is limited, as are reports of complication rates. This study presents efficacy and complications for patients treated with DRG stimulation.Materials and MethodsWe performed an observational, multicenter cohort study of all patients in Denmark implanted with FDA-approved DRG stimulation systems to treat chronic, neuropathic pain between 2014 and 2018. Follow-up period was one to three years.ResultsForty-three patients underwent trial DRG stimulation; 33 were subsequently fully implanted. Pain location: 58% lower extremity; 21% upper extremity; 21% thoracic/abdominal. At the end of the observation period, 58% of fully implanted patients were still implanted; 42% had fully functional systems.In these patients, average Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)-score of pain was reduced from 6.8 to 3.5 (p = 0.00049) and worst NRS-score was reduced from 8.6 to 6.0 (p = 0.0039) at 12 months follow-up. Pain Catastrophizing Score was reduced from 32 to 15 (p = 0.0039).Thirteen patients experienced complications related to defect leads (39% of implanted systems). In four patients (12%), lead removal left fragments in the root canal due to lead fracture, and three patients suffered permanent nerve damage during attempts to replace broken leads.ConclusionsThis study suggests a significant, clinically relevant effect of DRG stimulation on neuropathic pain, but also demonstrates substantial problems with maintenance and revision of currently available systems. Consequently, treatment with equipment marketed specifically for DRG stimulation is currently paused in Denmark.     

A Review of Neuromodulation for Treatment of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome in Pediatric Patients and Novel Use of Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation in an Adolescent Patient With 30-Month Follow-Up

ObjectivesComplex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a disorder in which pain and discomfort are out of proportion to the amount of tissue damage. While prevalence is 20.57 per 100,000 adults, it has not been studied in the U.S. pediatric population. Conservative treatment options include pharmacologic, behavioral, and psychological treatment. If these fail, invasive therapies such as sympathetic blocks and neuromodulation may be performed. The ACCURATE study demonstrated efficacy of dorsal root ganglion (DRG) stimulation for the treatment of refractory CRPS, but did not include pediatric patients and there are no reported cases of its use in the pediatric population. We review the use of neuromodulation for CRPS in pediatric patients and present a novel case using DRG stimulation in an adolescent patient.Materials and MethodsA literature search was performed for any studies of neuromodulation as treatment of pediatric CRPS. The literature is reviewed and the case of a 17-year-old female with CRPS treated with DRG stimulation is presented.ResultsA 15-year-old female developed CRPS type I of the left ankle after a sports injury. She was unable to wear a shoe or venture outside the home due to pain, swelling, and allodynia. Conservative therapies, including medications, physical therapy, and lumbosacral sympathetic plexus blocks, failed. At age 17, she underwent DRG stimulator lead placement targeting the left L4 and L5 nerve roots. Her therapy provided 100% relief of pain within four days of placement and was sustained at 30-month follow-up.ConclusionsDRG stimulation has been shown to significantly alter the symptomatology in patients with CRPS. This case suggests that DRG stimulation may be as effective for the treatment of refractory CRPS in pediatric patients as in adults.     

Lesser-Known Aspects of Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease: Programming Sessions,Hardware Surgeries,Residential Care Admissions,and Deaths

ObjectiveThe long-term treatment burden, duration of community living, and survival of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) after deep brain stimulation (DBS) implantation are unclear. This study aims to determine the frequency of programming, repeat hardware surgeries (of the intracranial electrode, implantable pulse generator [IPG], and extension-cable), and the timings of residential care and death in patients with PD treated with DBS.Materials and MethodsIn this cross-sectional, population-based study, individual-level data were collected from the Australian government covering a 15-year period (2002–2016) on 1849 patients with PD followed from DBS implantation.ResultsThe mean DBS implantation age was 62.6 years and mean follow-up 5.0 years. Mean annual programming rates were 6.9 in the first year and 2.8 in subsequent years. 51.4% of patients required repeat hardware surgery. 11.3% of patients had repeat intracranial electrode surgery (including an overall 1.1% of patients who were completely explanted). 47.6% of patients had repeat IPG/extension-cable surgery including for presumed battery depletion. 6.2% of patients had early repeat IPG/extension-cable surgery (within one year of any previous such surgery). Thirty-day postoperative mortality was 0.3% after initial DBS implantation and 0.6% after any repeat hardware surgery. 25.3% of patients were admitted into residential care and 17.4% died. The median interval to residential care and death was 10.2 years and 11.4 years, respectively. Age more than 65 years was associated with fewer repeat hardware surgeries for presumed complications (any repeat surgery of electrodes, extension-cables, and early IPG surgery) and greater rates of residential care admission and death.ConclusionsData from a large cohort of patients with PD treated with DBS found that the median life span after surgery is ten years. Repeat hardware surgery, including of the intracranial electrodes, is common. These findings support development of technologies to reduce therapy burden such as enhanced surgical navigation, hardware miniaturization, and improved battery efficiency.     

Surgical and Hardware-Related Adverse Events of Deep Brain Stimulation: A Ten-Year Single-Center Experience

IntroductionAlthough deep brain stimulation (DBS) is effective for treating a number of neurological and psychiatric indications, surgical and hardware-related adverse events (AEs) can occur that affect quality of life. This study aimed to give an overview of the nature and frequency of those AEs in our center and to describe the way they were managed. Furthermore, an attempt was made at identifying possible risk factors for AEs to inform possible future preventive measures.Materials and MethodsPatients undergoing DBS-related procedures between January 2011 and July 2020 were retrospectively analyzed to inventory AEs. The mean follow-up time was 43 ± 31 months. Univariate logistic regression analysis was used to assess the predictive value of selected demographic and clinical variables.ResultsFrom January 2011 to July 2020, 508 DBS-related procedures were performed including 201 implantations of brain electrodes in 200 patients and 307 implantable pulse generator (IPG) replacements in 142 patients. Surgical or hardware-related AEs following initial implantation affected 40 of 200 patients (20%) and resolved without permanent sequelae in all instances. The most frequent AEs were surgical site infections (SSIs) (9.95%, 20/201) and wire tethering (2.49%, 5/201), followed by hardware failure (1.99%, 4/201), skin erosion (1.0%, 2/201), pain (0.5%, 1/201), lead migration (0.52%, 2/386 electrode sites), and hematoma (0.52%, 2/386 electrode sites). The overall rate of AEs for IPG replacement was 5.6% (17/305). No surgical, ie, staged or nonstaged, electrode fixation, or patient-related risk factors were identified for SSI or wire tethering.ConclusionsMajor AEs including intracranial surgery–related AEs or AEs requiring surgical removal or revision of hardware are rare. In particular, aggressive treatment is required in SSIs involving multiple sites or when Staphylococcus aureus is identified. For future benchmarking, the development of a uniform reporting system for surgical and hardware-related AEs in DBS surgery would be useful.     

Endoscopic Lateral Approach for Dorsal Root Ganglion Burst Stimulation: Technical Note and Illustrative Case Series

IntroductionDorsal root ganglion (DRG) stimulation demonstrated superiority over traditional spinal cord stimulation with better pain relief and greater improvement of quality of life. However, leads specifically designed for DRG stimulation are difficult to implant in patients who previously underwent spinal surgery and show epidural scarring at the desired site of implantation because of the reduced stiffness of the lead. Nevertheless, recurrent leg or arm pain after spinal surgery usually manifests as a single level radiculopathy, which should theoretically be amenable to DRG stimulation.Materials and MethodsWe present the percutaneous transforaminal placement of cylindrical leads through a lateral endoscopic approach for DRG stimulation in burst mode.ResultsWe could successfully show that percutaneous transforaminal lead placement is feasible in three illustrative cases.ConclusionThis technical note combines two innovations, one linked to the other. The first innovation involves a novel endoscopic lateral transforaminal approach to insert a cylindrical lead to the DRG. Because this electrode is compatible with burst stimulation-enabled devices, a second innovation consists of the application of burst stimulation on the DRG.     

Paresthesia‐Free Spinal Nerve Root Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Neuropathic Pain

ObjectiveStimulation of the dorsal spinal roots, or spinal nerve root stimulation (SNRS), is a neuromodulation modality that can target pain within specific dermatomal distributions. The use of paresthesia-free stimulation has been described with conventional dorsal column spinal cord stimulation, although has yet to be described for SNRS. This objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy of paresthesia-free high-frequency (1000–1200 Hz) SNRS in the treatment of intractable, dermatomal neuropathic pain.Materials and MethodsA retrospective chart review was performed on 14 patients implanted with SNRS in varying distributions: Ten patients initially received tonic stimulation and crossed over to a paresthesia-free paradigm and four patients received only paresthesia-free stimulation. The primary outcome was reduction in pain severity (visual analog scale [VAS]), measured at baseline and follow-up to 24 months with paresthesia-free stimulation.ResultsAll 14 patients who received paresthesia-free stimulation had significant improvement in pain severity at a mean follow-up of 1.39 ± 0.15 years (VAS 7.46 at baseline vs. 3.25 at most recent follow-up, p < 0.001). Ten patients were initially treated with tonic stimulation and crossed over to paresthesia-free stimulation after a mean of 61.7 months. Baseline pain in these crossover patients was significantly improved at last follow-up with tonic stimulation (VAS 7.65 at baseline vs. 2.83 at 48 months, p < 0.001), although all patients developed uncomfortable paresthesias. There was no significant difference in pain severity between patients receiving tonic and paresthesia-free stimulation.ConclusionsWe present real-world outcomes of patients with intractable dermatomal neuropathic pain treated with paresthesia-free, high-frequency SNRS. We demonstrate its effectiveness in providing pain reduction at a level comparable to tonic SNRS up to 24 months follow-up, without producing uncomfortable paresthesias.     

Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation for Chronic Groin Pain: A Review

IntroductionChronic neuropathic groin pain develops in a significant number of postsurgical patients; however, multiple etiologies have been identified, and this makes it a challenging condition to treat. While treatment often involves a multimodal approach, advancements in neuromodulation technology, particularly dorsal root ganglion (DRG) stimulation, have benefited patients plagued by chronic pain refractory to standard treatment modalities. Our goal was to provide a definitive source of information for interventional pain physicians regarding groin pain and the use of DRG stimulation for its treatment.Materials and MethodsIn this narrative review, we provide an overview of groin pain and discuss potential pain generators. We also outline appropriate treatment options with particular interest on DRG stimulation. Lastly, we provide a narrative review of the published literature regarding DRG stimulation for chronic groin pain from a variety of etiologies.ConclusionDRG stimulation has emerged as an alternative neuromodulatory technique for patients with chronic groin pain. While previous studies suggest substantial sustained pain relief with DRG stimulation in this patient population, prospective randomized controlled studies are necessary before formal recommendations can be made.     

Surgical and Hardware Complications of Deep Brain Stimulation—A Single Surgeon Experience of 519 Cases Over 20 Years

ObjectiveDeep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery has its own set of risks and complications. This study from a single center and a single surgeon analyzes various risk factors for complications and tries to establish if there is a learning curve effect in minimizing the complications.Materials and MethodsA retrospective analysis of 519 patients (1024 leads) who underwent DBS surgery and 232 patients who underwent implantable pulse generator replacement (IPG), by a single surgeon, between the years 1999 and 2019 was performed. Perioperative and hardware related complications were evaluated.ResultsThe follow-up period ranged from six months to 20 years. Surgery-related complications occurred in 46 (8.9%) cases which included confusion in 31 (5.98%), intracerebral hemorrhage in 7 (1.3%), vasovagal attack in 3 (0.58%), respiratory distress in 2 (0.38%), postoperative aggressiveness in 1 (0.19%), and blepharospasm in 2 (0.38%) patients. Complications related to the DBS hardware were found in 35 cases, including erosion and infection in 22 (2.95%), inaccurate lead placement or migration in 6 (0.6%) lead fracture/extension wire failure in 2 (0.26%), IPG malfunction in 2 (0.26%), and hardware discomfort in 3 (0.4%) cases. In three patients, one lead was repositioned. In cases of infection, 87% of patients had either partial or complete removal of hardware. There was no mortality. The complications were analyzed for every 100 DBS procedures. There was a significant drop in the percentage of complications in from 23% in the first 100 cases to 7% in the last 100 cases (p < 0.0001).ConclusionConfusion remains the most frequent operative and perioperative complication. Erosion and infection of the surgical site represents the most frequent hardware complication. DBS surgery is safe and the complication rates are acceptably low. The complication rate also decreases with cumulative years of experience, demonstrating a learning curve effect.     

Paired Acute Invasive/Non-invasive Stimulation (PAINS) study: A phase I/II randomized,sham-controlled crossover trial in chronic neuropathic pain

BackgroundDorsal root ganglion (DRG) stimulation, an invasive method of neuromodulation, and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a non-invasive method of altering cortical excitability, have both proven effective in relieving chronic pain.ObjectiveWe employed a randomized, sham-controlled crossover study design to investigate whether single-session tDCS would have an additive therapeutic effect alongside DRG stimulation (DRGS) in the treatment of chronic pain.MethodsSixteen neuropathic pain patients who were previously implanted with DRG stimulators were recruited. Baseline pain scores were established with DRGS-OFF. Pain scores were then recorded with DRGS-ON, after paired sham tDCS stimulation, and after paired active anodal tDCS (a-tDCS) stimulation. For active tDCS, patients were randomized to ‘MEG (magnetoencephalography) localized’ tDCS or contralateral motor cortex (M1) tDCS for 30 min. EEG recordings and evaluations of tDCS adverse effects were also collected.ResultsAll participants reported the interventions to be tolerable with no significant adverse effects during the session. Paired DRGS/active tDCS resulted in a significant reduction in pain scores compared to paired DRGS-ON/sham tDCS or DRGS alone. There was no difference in the additive effect of M1 vs. MEG-localized tDCS. Significant augmentation of beta activity was observed between DRGS-OFF and DRGS-ON conditions, as well as between paired DRGS-ON/sham tDCS and paired DRGS-ON/active tDCS.ConclusionOur results indicate that a single session of tDCS alongside DRGS is safe and can significantly reduce pain acutely in neuropathic pain patients. Paired invasive/non-invasive neuromodulation is a promising new treatment strategy for pain management and should be evaluated further to assess long-term benefits.     

Low Rate of Intrathecal Baclofen Pump Catheter-Related Complications: Long-Term Study in Over 100 Adult Patients Associated With Reinforced Catheter

ObjectivesIntrathecal baclofen (ITB) is a cost-effective therapy for patients with severe spasticity. The most common complications are catheter-related complications (CRCs) including kinking/occlusion, blockage, migration, fracture, disconnection, and CSF leak. Our objective was to determine the CRC rate in a large cohort of adults with newly implanted ITB pump systems with polymer reinforced silicone catheters.Materials and MethodsThis is a retrospective study of a prospectively maintained database consisting of patients who had undergone implantation of ITB pump systems with Ascenda (Medtronic, Minneapolis) catheters from 2013 to 2020. Over this seven-year period, 141 patients underwent ITB pump system implantations; 126 of which had a minimum of one-year follow-up.ResultsThe 126 patients with a minimum of one year follow-up (average 43 month; range 12–89), had an average age of 51 years (63% male). Severe spasticity was due to spinal cord injury (38%), traumatic brain injury (15%), cerebral palsy (13%), multiple sclerosis (11%), stroke (10%), and other (13%). Nine (7.1%) CRCs occurred in 7 (5.6%) patients (median 6 mo. post-implant): 5 intrathecal catheter occlusions (range 3–52 months post-implant), two fractures in one patient (6 months), one disconnection at the catheter pump interface (2 months), and one due to kinking at 84 months No migrations occurred.ConclusionsReported CRCs have been high for ITB pump systems. Ours is the first large cohort, long-term study of CRCs related to reinforced catheters; additionally, our low CRC rate compares favorably to previously published data. Thus, implantation of reinforced catheters may be associated with a low CRC rate.     

Is Spinal Cord Stimulation Still Effective After One or More Surgical Revisions?

ObjectivesSpinal cord stimulation (SCS) is burdened with surgical complications that may require one or several surgical revision(s), challenging its risk/benefit ratio and cost-effectiveness. Our objective was to evaluate its outcome and efficacy after one or more SCS surgical revisions.Materials and MethodsWe identified and retrospectively analyzed 116 patients treated by tonic paresthesia-based SCS who experienced one or more complication(s) requiring at least one surgical revision. Data collected included initial indication, revision indication, number of revisions, and lead design (paddle or percutaneous). Outcome after SCS revision was evaluated by pain intensity decrease (comparing baseline and postrevision Numerical Rating Scale [NRS] scores) and percentage of patients reporting pain relief ≥50%. Outcome was analyzed according to the number of surgical revisions and the revision indications.ResultsMost of the patients (61%) underwent only one revision (mean delay after implantation 44 months). The most frequent causes of revisions were hardware dysfunction (32%), lead migration (23%), and infection (18%). Revision(s) repaired the SCS issue in 87% of the cases. One year after the first revision, 82% of the patients reported pain relief ≥50%, and the mean NRS decrease was 4.0 compared with baseline (p < 0.001). Benefit of SCS revision tended to decrease with the number of revisions but did not differ across revision indications. No serious surgical complications related to the revision occurred, except for three hematomas occurring after repeated revisions.ConclusionsOur data suggest that surgical revision of SCS system is safe and led to significant pain relief in most of the cases, provided that the initial indication was good and that the previous stimulation was effective. However, success of SCS revision decreases with the number of revisions.     

Health Care Resource Utilization of High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation for Treatment of Chronic Refractory Low Back Pain

IntroductionChronic refractory low back pain (CRLBP) is a diagnosis characterized by chronic low back pain in patients who are poor candidates for surgery and fail conservative management. High-frequency spinal cord stimulation (HF-SCS) is a new advance in neuromodulation that may be effective in treating these patients. However, the cost burden of this therapy is yet undetermined.Materials and MethodsIBM MarketScan® (IBM, Armonk, NY) data bases were used to retrospectively identify patients with HF-SCS implantation between 2016 and 2019 in the United States. Those with low back pain diagnosis without history of surgery were included in the cohort. Cost data, including inpatient and outpatient service, medication, and out-of-pocket costs, were collected at six months before HF-SCS implantation and one, three, and six months after implantation. The explant rate within six months was evaluated.ResultsA total of 119 patients met the inclusion criteria. Most patients were female (73.1%) and owned commercial insurance (83.2%). Common comorbidities included inflammatory arthritis (22.7%), depression (26.1%), hypertension (44.5%), and obesity (26.1%). In the six months before HF-SCS implantation, patients incurred median total costs of $15,766 (first quartile [Q1]: $8,847; third quartile [Q3]: $24,947), whereas the postimplant median total cost excluding device acquisition was $398 (Q1: $145, Q3: $1,272) at one month, $2,569 (Q1: $823, Q3: $5,266) at three months, and $5,840 (Q1: $2,160; Q3: $14,607) at six months. The average reduction in total cost was $6,914 (95% CI: $588, $12,458, p < 0.001). The median total acquisition cost was $43,586 (Q1: $29,506, Q3: $69,426), with most coming from outpatient services. Of 88 patients with six-month continuous enrollment, two (2.3%) had device explant.ConclusionsWe present an analysis using large claims data bases of the cost of HF-SCS for treating CRLBP and show that it may be associated with a significant decrease in total health care costs, offsetting device acquisition costs in 27 months. As advances in neuromodulation expand therapy options for patients, it will be important to understand their financial implications.     

Implantable Pulse Generator Site May Be Associated With Spinal Cord Stimulation Revision Surgeries

BackgroundThe use of implantable pulse generators (IPG) for spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in patients with chronic pain has been well established. Although IPG-related complications have been reported on, the association between IPG site and SCS complications has not been well studied.ObjectiveTo investigate whether IPG placement site in buttock or flank is associated with SCS complications and, hence, revision surgeries.MethodA retrospective cohort study was performed that included 330 patients (52% female) treated at a single institution who underwent permanent implantation of an SCS system between 2014 and 2018. Patients ranged between 20 and 94 years of age (mean: 57.54 ± 13.25). Statistical analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics. Tests included independent samples t test, chi-square test, Mann–Whitney U test, Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient, and logistic regression.ResultsThere was a total of 93 revision surgeries (rate of 28%), where 71 out of 330 patients (rate of 21.5%) had had at least one revision surgery. Univariate tests demonstrated a significant association between IPG site and revision surgeries (p = 0.028 [chi-square test] and p = 0.031 [Mann–Whitney U test]); however, multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that neither IPG site was more likely than the other to require revision surgeries (p = 0.286).ConclusionAlthough this study found a significant association between IPG site and revision surgeries, the effect of IPG site was not found to be predictive. The IPG site likely influences whether a patient will require revision surgery, but further investigation is required to establish this association.     

Higher Preimplantation Opioid Doses Associated With Long‐Term Spinal Cord Stimulation Failure in 211 Patients With Failed Back Surgery Syndrome

ObjectiveSpinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an effective treatment in failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS). We studied the effect of preimplantation opioid use on SCS outcome and the effect of SCS on opioid use during a two-year follow-up period.Materials and methodsThe study cohort included 211 consecutive FBSS patients who underwent an SCS trial from January 1997 to March 2014. Participants were divided into groups, which were as follows: 1) SCS trial only (n = 47), 2) successful SCS (implanted and in use throughout the two-year follow-up period, n = 131), and 3) unsuccessful SCS (implanted but later explanted or revised due to inadequate pain relief, n = 29). Patients who underwent explantation for other reasons (n = 4) were excluded. Opioid purchase data from January 1995 to March 2016 were retrieved from national registries.ResultsHigher preimplantation opioid doses associated with unsuccessful SCS (ROC: AUC = 0.66, p = 0.009), with 35 morphine milligram equivalents (MME)/day as the optimal cutoff value. All opioids were discontinued in 23% of patients with successful SCS, but in none of the patients with unsuccessful SCS (p = 0.004). Strong opioids were discontinued in 39% of patients with successful SCS, but in none of the patients with unsuccessful SCS (p = 0.04). Mean opioid dose escalated from 18 ± 4 MME/day to 36 ± 6 MME/day with successful SCS and from 22 ± 8 MME/day to 82 ± 21 MME/day with unsuccessful SCS (p < 0.001).ConclusionsHigher preimplantation opioid doses were associated with SCS failure, suggesting the need for opioid tapering before implantation. With continuous SCS therapy and no explantation or revision due to inadequate pain relief, 39% of FBSS patients discontinued strong opioids, and 23% discontinued all opioids. This indicates that SCS should be considered before detrimental dose escalation.     

Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Reasonable Alternative Treatment in Patients With Symptomatic Adult Scoliosis for Whom Surgical Therapy Is Not Suitable? A Pilot Study

IntroductionIn adult scoliosis, dorsal instrumentation and fusion can provide significant improvement of pain and disability scores (Owestry Index); however, complication rates of up to 39% have been reported. As such, recent attempts have been made at expanding the surgical spectrum to include less invasive techniques in patients such as neuromodulation, specifically spinal cord stimulation (SCS). We therefore aimed to evaluate its use in a larger cohort of adult scoliosis patients in the form of a pilot study.Materials and MethodsWe analyzed prospectively collected data from 18 adult scoliosis patients receiving SCS treatment in our institution between February 2019 and May 2020. Clinical follow-up was performed at 3, 6, and 12 months following implantation of an epidural SCS System. Patients reported numeric rating scale (NRS) values for the categories of lower back pain (LBP) and regional pain (RP) both at rest and in motion. Further, SF-36, ADS-K, PSQI, and ODI forms were completed. The study was approved by the institutional Ethics Committee (EA2/093/13).ResultsInitial preoperative NRS of LBP at rest was significantly reduced following SCS at three (45% reduction, p = 0.005) and six (43% reduction, p = 0.009) months follow-up. LBP in motion was also reduced at three (27% reduction, p = 0.002) and six (33% reduction vs. preoperative, p = 0.005) months. RP at rest was reduced at three (38% reduction, p = 0.003) and six (37% reduction, p = 0.007) and in movement at three (29% reduction, 0.006) and six (32% reduction, p = 0.011). Loss of thoracic kyphosis and increased pelvic incidence were associated with worse NRS response to SCS stimulation at six months follow-up.DiscussionIn overweight, older adults for whom the risks of corrective surgery must be carefully considered, neuromodulation can significantly reduce LBP as well as regional pain in the first six months following implantation. These findings may provide a reasonable alternative in patients not willing or eligible to undergo extensive corrective surgery.     

Detoxification of Neuromodulation-Eligible Patients by a Standardized Protocol: A Retrospective Pilot Study

ObjectivesPatients eligible for spinal cord stimulation (SCS) generally experience excruciating pain, requiring more opioid consumption, which is usually an indication for SCS implantation. After final implantation, SCS has the ability to stabilize or decrease opioid usage in half of the patients. In this study, opioids were actively eliminated prior to implantation of any neuromodulation device with a standardized detoxification protocol. This pilot study aims to explore the feasibility, effectiveness, and safety of this opioid detoxification protocol prior to neuromodulation techniques.Materials and MethodsIn this retrospective pilot study, 70 patients who were taking opioids and who were eligible for neuromodulation techniques underwent the detoxification program. A combined in- and out-patient clinic protocol was applied, whereby clonidine was the main component of both parts of the program. A multidisciplinary team with pain physicians and psychologists was responsible for performing this detoxification program. Safety and feasibility were systematically recorded during the hospitalization.ResultsNo serious safety issues were reported. At the start of the program, patients reported a mild sedative effect of clonidine. Additionally, most patients presented mild symptoms of opioid withdrawal, which were partially countered by the sedative effect of clonidine. Both patients and the medical staff found this protocol feasible in clinical practice. Concerning the effectiveness, a statistically significant decrease in median morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) was found with an MME of 175 (Q1–Q3: 118.1–240) at baseline, and at the last available follow-up visit the MME was 0 (Q1–Q3: 0–16.88).ConclusionsThis standardized detoxification program has proven its effectiveness, safety, and feasibility in this single-center experience pilot study in patients eligible for neuromodulation techniques.