Switching from conventional to extrafine aerosol beclomethasone dipropionate therapy in children: a 6-month,open- label,randomized trial

BACKGROUND: In adults with asthma, hydrofluoralkane-134a beclomethasone dipropionate (HFA-BDP) extrafine aerosol provides equivalent asthma control at half the daily dose of conventional chlorofluorocarbon (CFC)-BDP. OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare the efficacy and tolerability of switching from CFC-BDP to HFA-BDP at half the daily dose in children with stable asthma. METHODS: This 6-month, open-label, randomized, multicenter study enrolled 520 children aged 5 to 11 years with well-controlled asthma receiving inhaled CFC-BDP or budesonide 200 to 800 microg/d x. (Four hundred fifty-two patients were using doses within the recommended range of 200-400 microg and were analyzed separately.) During a 4-week run-in period, patients used CFC-BDP plus a spacer (CFC-BDP+S) at approximately the same dose as they were using before study entry. Patients were then randomized in a 1:3 ratio to continue on CFC-BDP+S or switch to HFA-BDP Autohaler at half the daily dose. RESULTS: The change from baseline in morning peak expiratory flow was significantly greater in patients receiving 100-200 microg of HFA-BDP compared with those receiving 200-400 microg of CFC-BDP+S at weeks 7 to 8 (8.5 and 0.4 L/min, respectively; P =.014), with continuing improvement in both groups over 6 months (12.2 and 12.4 L/min, respectively, at month 6). There were no significant differences between treatments in mean change from baseline in FEV(1), percentage of days or nights without asthma symptoms, and daily beta-agonist use over the 6-month treatment period. The proportion of patients who had one or more asthma exacerbations, the incidence of adverse events, and the percentage change from baseline in 24-hour urinary free cortisol levels were similar in the 2 treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that asthma control can be well maintained in children when switching from CFC-BDP+S to an HFA-BDP Autohaler at doses as low as 100 to 200 microg/d.     

Long-term safety and efficacy of a chlorofluorocarbon-free beclomethasone dipropionate extrafine aerosol.

BACKGROUND: Beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) extrafine aerosol, a newly developed pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) with a hydrofluoroalkane-134a (HFA) propellant (HFA-BDP; Qvar, 3M Pharmaceuticals, St. Paul, MN), has been shown to be effective in controlling asthma symptoms at approximately half the daily dose of chlorofluorocarbon (CFC)-BDP. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the long-term efficacy and safety of switching patients with asthma maintained on a stable dose of CFC-BDP pMDI to therapy with HFA-BDP pMDI at approximately half their previous daily dose of CFC-BDP. METHODS: This was an open-label, randomized, parallel-group multicenter trial. Patients with at least a 6-month history of asthma whose symptoms were controlled on CFC-BDP, 400 to 1600 microg daily, during a 2-week run-in period were randomized in a 1:3 ratio to CFC-BDP at the same daily dose or HFA-BDP at approximately half the daily dose of CFC-BDP for 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 473 patients were randomized: 354 to HFA-BDP, 119 to CFC-BDP. There were no statistically significant differences between groups in mean change from baseline in morning (AM) peak expiratory flow rate or forced expiratory volume in one second throughout the study. There were no consistent differences between treatment groups in individual asthma symptoms or daily beta2-agonist use during the study. There was an increase in the percentage of symptom-free days between baseline and month 12 in the HFA-BDP group (11.5%) and the CFC-BDP group (4.6%). No statistically significant differences in serum osteocalcin levels or adverse events were seen during the study or in AM plasma cortisol levels at month 12. CONCLUSIONS: Asthma control was maintained in patients switched from a stable dose of CFC-BDP (400 to 1600 microg daily) to HFA-BDP at approximately half the CFC-BDP dose (200 to 800 microg daily), and was maintained over the next 12 months. HFA-BDP demonstrated a similar safety profile to CFC-BDP; there were no differences between the agents with regard to systemic effects.     

Step-down therapy with low-dose fluticasone-salmeterol combination or medium-dose hydrofluoroalkane 134a-beclomethasone alone

BACKGROUND: Options for step-down therapy include use of inhaled corticosteroids alone or in combination with a long-acting beta2-agonist. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate step-down therapy with a fluticasone propionate-salmeterol (FP-SM) combination administered through a dry powder inhaler (DPI; Advair Diskus) versus a medium dose of hydrofluoroalkane 143a-beclomethasone dipropionate (HFA-BDP) administered through a breath-actuated pressurized metered-dose inhaler (QVAR Autohaler). METHODS: Thirty-nine patients with uncontrolled moderate-to-severe asthma were treated with 1000 microg of DPI-administered BDP twice daily (DPI-BDP) for 4 weeks and then randomized to 200 microg of HFA-BDP twice daily (n = 20) or 100 microg of FP and 50 microg of SM twice daily (FM-SM; n = 19) for 8 weeks in a double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group design. We measured the provocative dose of methacholine producing a 20% fall in FEV1 (methacholine PD20) as the primary outcome, with secondary outcomes being lung function, surrogate inflammatory markers, diary card responses, quality of life, and safety. RESULTS: There was a 0.9 (95% confidence interval, 0.5-1.2) doubling dose improvement in methacholine PD20 comparing asthma before versus after DPI-BDP. HFA-BDP maintained this improvement, whereas FP-SM produced a further significant improvement, amounting to a 1.1 (95% confidence interval, 0.2-2.1) doubling dose difference at 8 weeks for FP-SM versus HFA-BDP. Effects on FEV1, peak expiratory flow, and quality of life (symptoms and emotions) were similar to those on methacholine PD20, with a significant difference between FP-SM and HFA-BDP. Suppression of plasma and urinary cortisol and serum osteocalcin levels occurred with DPI-BDP, but values returned to baseline levels within 1 month of HFA-BDP or FP-SM administration. CONCLUSION: After high-dose inhaled corticosteroid, stepping down with the combination inhaler conferred further improvements in bronchoprotection, bronchodilatation, and clinical control, but not inflammatory markers, compared with that seen with a medium dose of inhaled corticosteroid.     

A six-month, placebo-controlled comparison of the safety and efficacy of salmeterol or beclomethasone for persistent asthma.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data comparing the long-term safety and efficacy of long-acting inhaled beta2-agonists versus low-dose inhaled corticosteroids in the treatment of asthma. OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy of salmeterol xinafoate, beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP), and placebo over a 6-month treatment period in patients with persistent asthma. METHODS: Salmeterol (42 microg twice daily), BDP (84 microg four times daily), or placebo was administered via metered-dose inhaler to 386 adolescent and adult inhaled corticosteroid-naive patients in a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study. Eligible patients demonstrated a forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) from 65% to 90% of predicted values. Pulmonary function, symptom control, frequency of asthma exacerbations, bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) to methacholine challenge, and adverse events were assessed. RESULTS: There were few statistically significant differences between the two active treatments over 6 months of therapy. Asthma symptoms and lung function were significantly improved with both salmeterol and BDP compared with placebo (changes from baseline in FEV1 of 0.28 L (SE = 0.04) and 0.23 L (SE = 0.04), respectively, compared with 0.08 L (SE = 0.04); P < or = .014). There were no significant differences among the treatment groups with respect to the distribution of asthma exacerbations over time. Both salmeterol and BDP significantly reduced BHR compared with placebo (P < or = .033; changes from baseline of 1.29 (SE = 0.26) and 1.42 (SE = 0.24) doubling doses at 6 months, respectively, compared with 0.24 (SE = 0.29) doubling dose for placebo). No rebound effect in BHR was seen upon cessation of any of the three treatment regimens. There were no clinically important differences in the safety profiles among the three treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Both salmeterol and BDP are effective and well-tolerated when administered for 6 months to inhaled corticosteroid-naive patients with persistent asthma.     

Air trapping in mild and moderate asthma: effect of inhaled corticosteroids

BACKGROUND: Air trapping reflects small airway obstruction in asthma and can be assessed quantitatively by high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT). Hydrofluoroalkane-beclomethasone dipropionate (HFA-BDP) is deposited across all sizes of airways, including the small ones. However, its long-term effect on air trapping remains unknown in uncontrolled asthma. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effect of inhaled corticosteroids of different particle size - HFA-BDP and fluticasone propionate (FP) - on lung attenuation in mild-to-moderate uncontrolled asthma. METHODS: A randomized study was performed to analyze the effect of HFA-BDP (400 microg/d) or FP (500 microg/d) given over a period of 3 months to patients with uncontrolled mild-to-moderate asthma. HRCT was performed with spirometric gating, and lung attenuation was measured at residual volume and at pulmonary total capacity. The difference between inspiratory and expiratory attenuation was calculated as an air trapping index. RESULTS: Twenty-five out of 58 patients had abnormal air trapping and could be included in the study. Lung attenuation significantly diminished in the posterior zones of the lung after a 3-month treatment with HFA-BDP or FP, but the difference between the groups was not significant. Adjusted mean variations of the air trapping index from baseline to treatment completion were 34.3 (11.2, 57.3) and 27.3 (6.4, 48.2) for the HFA-BDP and FP groups, respectively. However, the reduction of air trapping area was more pronounced in the group treated with HFA-BDP. CONCLUSION: Inhaled corticosteroids decrease air trapping in uncontrolled asthma regardless of their particle size. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: In mild-to-moderate asthma, air trapping assessed by HRCT may be a new outcome related to the control of the disease.     

Influence of changing from chlorofluorocarbon (CFC)-beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) to hydrofluoroalkane (HFA)-BDP on pulmonary function in asthmatic children]

The discontinuation of chlorofluorocarbon- beclomethasone dipropionate (CFC-BDP) products has made it necessary to switch to hydrofluoroalkane (HFA)-BDP. We studied the influence of the changing from CFC-BDP to HFA-BDP on pulmonary function in asthmatic children. METHODS: In twenty asthmatic children (mean: 10.5 years of age) who were clinically well-controlled with CFC-BDP for longer than 6 months, CFC-BDP was switched to HFA-BDP, at half the dose of CFC-BDP. We examined the changes in spirometric parameters at 3-6 months after the switch. RESULTS: FEV1.0% ([FEV1.0/FVC]x100) and %V50 ([V50 measured/V50 predicted]x100) were significantly improved (FEV1.0%: pre 81.7+/-4.7-->post 84.1+/-4.1 [p<0.05], % V50: pre 66.9+/-6.9-->post74.4+/-11.3 [p<0.05]). Comparison between patients with greater than 10% improvement in %V50 and those with less than 10% improvement revealed differences in the duration of using CFC-BDP (former 2.8+/-0.9 years, latter 5.2+/-2.4 years [p<0.05]) despite lack of difference in age at initiation of treatment with CFC-BDP. CONCLUSION: The changing from CFC-BDP to HFA-BDP showed the improvement of lung function in a part of asthmatic children. We should keep in mind that there are some differences of efficacy among the inhaled corticosteroid products. The long-term anti-inflammatory medication should be adjusted to normalize the pulmonary function on the basis of the degree of airway inflammation.     

Differential anti-inflammatory effects of large and small particle size inhaled corticosteroids in asthma

BACKGROUND: Extra-fine particle formulations of hydrofluoroalkane-134a beclometasone dipropionate (HFA-BDP) exhibit clinical effects comparable with conventional particle formulations of chlorofluorocarbon beclometasone dipropionate (CFC-BDP) at half the dose. There is little data comparing their effects on inflammation. We have evaluated the effects of HFA-BDP and CFC-BDP on pulmonary and systemic markers of asthmatic inflammation. METHODS: A double-blind randomized crossover trial was undertaken comparing the anti-inflammatory effects of HFA-BDP (100 and 400 microg/day) and CFC-BDP (200 and 800 microg/day). Treatment with montelukast was evaluated as add-on to the higher dose of BDP. RESULTS: Compared with baseline after withdrawal of usual asthma therapy, 100 microg of HFA-BDP significantly attenuated serum eosinophilic cationic protein levels (0.61-fold change, 95% CI 0.49-0.77; a 39% reduction, P < 0.001), but 200 microg of CFC-BDP did not (0.87-fold change, 95% CI 0.63-1.23; P = 1). A dose of 800 microg of CFC-BDP and 400 microg of HFA-BDP led to reductions in exhaled nitric oxide (0.57-fold change, 95% CI 0.44-0.73; a 43% reduction, P < 0.001 and 0.65-fold change, 95% CI 0.47-0.91; a 35% reduction, P = 0.008, respectively); and peripheral eosinophils (-74 cells/microl, 95% CI -146 to -2; P = 0.020 and -77 cells/microl, 95% CI -140 to -14; P = 0.012, respectively). Montelukast further reduced exhaled nitric oxide (0.81-fold change, 95% CI 0.66-0.98; P = 0.028) with 400 microg HFA-BDP and eosinophils (-44 cells/microl, 95% CI -80 to -8; P = 0.012) with 800 microg CFC-BDP, but not vice versa. CONCLUSION: Chlorofluorocarbon beclometasone dipropionate and HFA-BDP have differential effects on pulmonary and systemic inflammation, which dictate the additive effects of montelukast.     

Comparison of roflumilast, an oral anti-inflammatory, with beclomethasone dipropionate in the treatment of persistent asthma

BACKGROUND: Roflumilast is an oral, once-daily phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor with anti-inflammatory activity in development for the treatment of asthma. Roflumilast was compared with inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) in patients with asthma. METHODS: In a double blind, double-dummy, randomized, noninferiority study, 499 patients (forced expiratory volume in 1 s [FEV1] = 50-85% predicted) received roflumilast 500 microg once daily or BDP 200 microg twice daily (400 microg/day) for 12 weeks. Lung function and adverse events were monitored. RESULTS: Roflumilast and BDP significantly improved FEV1 by 12% (270 +/- 30 ml) and 14% (320 +/- 30 ml), respectively (P < 0.0001 vs baseline). Roflumilast and BDP also significantly improved forced vital capacity (FVC) (P < 0.0001 vs baseline). There were no significant differences between roflumilast and BDP with regard to improvement in FEV1 and FVC. Roflumilast and BDP showed small improvements in median asthma symptom scores (-0.82 and -1.00, respectively) and reduced rescue medication use (-1.00 and -1.15 median puffs/day, respectively; P < 0.0001 vs baseline). These small differences between roflumilast and BDP were not considered clinically relevant. Both agents were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Once daily, oral roflumilast 500 microg was comparable with inhaled twice-daily BDP (400 microg/day) in improving pulmonary function and asthma symptoms, and reducing rescue medication use in patients with asthma.     

Comparative effects of hydrofluoroalkane and chlorofluorocarbon beclomethasone dipropionate inhalation on small airways: assessment with functional helical thin-section computed tomography

A double-blind, randomized, parallel-group pilot study compared the relative efficacy of hydrofluoroalkane-134a beclomethasone dipropionate (HFA-BDP [QVAR]; mass median aerodynamic diameter, 0. 8-1.2 m) versus cholorofluorocarbon-11/12 BDP (CFC-BDP [Beclovent]; mass median aerodynamic diameter, 3.5-4.0 m) in 31 steroid naive patients with mild to moderate asthma (PC(20,) 4 mg/mL). Functional high-resolution computed tomography was used to assess the relative efficacy of HFA-BDP and CFC-BDP on regional air trapping, as an indirect measure of small airways function and on regional hyperreactivity. Pretreatment functional computed tomography was performed at residual volume before and after methacholine challenge. After 4 weeks of treatment, functional imaging was repeated before and after the same concentration of methacholine that was administered before the treatment (n = 19 patients). Quantitative assessment of changes in distribution of lung attenuation was performed. After 4 weeks of treatment, the HFA-BDP group showed significantly more improvement in air trapping overall (a shift in the lung attenuation curve at residual volume toward more attenuation) on the posttreatment computed tomography scan (P <.05; Fisher's Exact Test). After an equal constrictor stimulus (methacholine concentration), subjects treated with HFA-BDP (n = 10 patients) showed less increase in air trapping overall than subjects treated with CFC-BDP (n = 9 patients) on the posttreatment scans compared with the pretreatment scans (P <.001; Fisher's Exact Test). No significant difference was demonstrated between the 2 treatment groups with respect to improvement in symptoms, spirometry, or methacholine responsiveness assessed by FEV(1), except for a greater reduction in breathlessness in the HFA-BDP group (P <.05). We conclude that HFA-BDP may have greater efficacy in the peripheral airways and that this effect is better assessed with functional imaging computed tomography techniques than with conventional physiologic tests.     

Low-dose inhaled budesonide once or twice daily for 27 months in children with mild asthma

This study is an extended follow-up for 24 months of a 12-week trial to study the long-term clinical efficacy of low-dose inhaled budesonide (BUD) once or twice daily in children with mild asthma. A total of 122 children (mean age 9.7 years, girls/boys; 42/80) with mild asthma (FEV1 103.7% of predicted, reversibility in FEV1 3.5%, and fall in FEV1 after exercise 12.2%), not previously treated with inhaled steroids, were included in a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study. The children were treated with inhaled BUD 100 or 200 microg administered via Turbuhaler once daily in the morning, 100 microg twice daily, or placebo for 27 months. Exercise and methacholine challenges were performed at 3-month intervals the first year and at 6-month intervals the second year, in a total of seven visits. A significant dose-response effect favoring BUD 200 microg daily (vs 100 microg daily) was found when comparing changes in FEV1, FEF25%, and FEV50%; the fall in FEV1 after an exercise test; and the effect on blood eosinophils. Bronchial hyperreactivity to methacholine decreased significantly on three visits in patients treated with BUD 200 microg daily compared to placebo. Growth rate was not significantly affected except in children aged 7-11 years at baseline after 12 months of treatment. In conclusion, 100 or 200 microg daily of inhaled BUD for 27 months is safe and effective in protecting against exercise-induced asthma and achieving nearly normal lung function. Baseline lung function was not significantly affected in this group of children with mild asthma.     

Efficacy and safety overview of a new inhaled corticosteroid, QVAR (hydrofluoroalkane-beclomethasone extrafine inhalation aerosol), in asthma

Chlorofluorocarbon (CFC)-containing inhalers are gradually being phased out and replaced with hydrofluoroalkane (HFA)-based alternatives. The reformulation provided the opportunity to improve the inhalation technology and physical characteristics of corticosteroid formulations. QVAR contains HFA-beclomethasone dipropionate (HFA-BDP) with the steroid in solution rather than suspension, which, in combination with improved inhaler technology, produces an extrafine aerosol with a mass median aerodynamic diameter of 1.1 microm (smaller than the 3.5-4.0 microm found with CFC-BDP). It was predicted and demonstrated that the smaller particle size of QVAR would be deposited in the lung to a greater extent than that found with CFC-BDP, particularly in the small airway, a major site of inflammation. Increased lung deposition of QVAR permits a reduction in dosage relative to CFC-BDP. Clinical evidence confirms that adult and elderly patients required approximately half the dose of QVAR to achieve the same degree of asthma control as with CFC-BDP. In long-term assessments, patients taking CFC-BDP could be switched to QVAR at half the daily dose without exacerbation of their asthma symptoms. QVAR was associated with a low overall incidence of side effects and, at the maximum recommended dose of 640 microg/d, caused no more adrenal suppression than 672 microg/d CFC-BDP.     

Inhaled corticosteroids decrease vascularity of the bronchial mucosa in patients with asthma

BACKGROUND: Increased vascularity in airway mucosa is a distinctive feature of airway remodelling in asthma. While corticosteroids have proved most effective in modifying airway inflammation, the effect of inhaled corticosteroids on increased airway mucosal vascularity in asthmatics has been little studied. OBJECTIVE: We examined the effect of inhaled corticosteroid on airway vascularity in bronchial biopsy specimens taken from asthmatic patients. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We studied bronchial biopsies from 28 asthmatic patients before and after treatment with inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) 800 microg/daily, or placebo, for 6 months in a double-blind manner. Biopsy specimens were evaluated for number of vessels and percentage of area occupied by vessels, using computerized image analysis after staining for type IV collagen in vessel walls. Specimens were also examined for extent of collagen III in the subepithelial basement membrane. In addition, we compared asthmatic specimens with biopsy specimens taken from non-asthmatic control subjects. RESULTS: There was a significant increase in number of vessels (P < 0.01) and percent vascularity (P < 0.001) in the submucosa of asthmatic patients compared with control subjects. After 6 months of treatment, we observed significant improvements in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), FEV1% and airway responsiveness (P < 0.05, each) in the BDP treatment group compared with the placebo group. This was accompanied by significant decreases in both vessel number and percent vascularity in the airways of BDP-treated patients (P < 0.05, each). We also observed a significant correlation between change in percent vascularity and change in collagen III thickness in the BDP-treated patients (rs = 0.90, P < 0.001). Furthermore, the change in percent vascularity was inversely correlated with both FEV1 (rs = -0.49, P < 0.05) and airway responsiveness (rs = -0.36, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that inhaled corticosteroid treatment of asthma reduced airway wall vascularity during airway remodelling.     

Effect of inhaled indomethacin in asthmatic patients taking high doses of inhaled corticosteroids

Background: Cyclooxygenase products of arachidonic acid may play a part in bronchoconstriction and airway inflammation in asthma. Objective: We sought to determine the effect of inhaled indomethacin on asthma control and asthma exacerbations during reduction of inhaled corticosteroids in patients with moderate-to-severe steroid-dependent asthma. Methods: We conducted a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, multicenter study in 38 patients with asthma taking high doses (≥1500 μg/d) of beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP). After a run-in period, patients were assigned inhaled indomethacin (50 mg/d) or placebo for 6 weeks, during which the daily doses of BDP were reduced to half at week 2 and then to one third of the baseline dose at week 4. Results: Data were available from 34 patients. After the reduction of BDP doses, FEV₁, peak expiratory flow, asthma symptoms, and exhaled nitric oxide concentrations deteriorated in both treatment groups, but these effects were less pronounced in the indomethacin group compared with the placebo group. During the 6-week treatment period, 89% of the patients receiving placebo had relapse of asthma, whereas only 38% of those receiving inhaled indomethacin did so (P = .003). Conclusion: Inhalation of indomethacin can reduce asthma exacerbations induced by reduction of high-dose inhaled corticosteroid in steroid-dependent asthma. (J Allergy Clin Immunol 2000;105:1134-9.)     

Effects of inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate on serum IgE levels and clinical symptoms in atopic asthma

BACKGROUND: A high serum immunoglobulin (Ig)E level is considered a potent predictor for the development of asthma and IgE is targeted for treatment of asthma. Although inhaled corticosteroids are well established in the treatment of asthma, the effects of inhaled corticosteroids on serum IgE levels in asthma remain uncertain. METHODS: We therefore examined asthma symptoms, concentrations of total serum IgE and specific IgE antibodies to selected allergens, blood eosinophil counts and lung functions before and 3 months after treatment with either inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP; 800 microg/day) (n = 7) or inhaled beta2-agonists alone (n = 7) in patients with atopic asthma in a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group controlled trial. RESULTS: Inhaled BDP significantly improved asthma symptom scores and forced expiratory volume in 1 s, and decreased blood eosinophil counts, total serum IgE levels and specific IgE antibodies to house dust mite and cedar. Decreases in total serum IgE significantly correlated with an improvement in asthma symptom scores. In contrast, none of parameters altered in patients with atopic asthma treated with inhaled beta2-agonists alone. CONCLUSIONS: Inhaled corticosteroids may improve the subsequent clinical course of atopic asthma in association with a reduction of serum IgE levels.     

Fluticasone propionate versus zafirlukast: effect in patients previously receiving inhaled corticosteroid therapy.

BACKGROUND: The use of inhaled corticosteroids compared with leukotriene modifying drugs in the treatment of persistent asthma has not been extensively studied. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of a low dose of fluticasone propionate (FP) and zafirlukast in patients previously maintained on inhaled corticosteroids. METHODS: Patients (> or = 12 years old; FEV1 = 60% to 85% of predicted) with persistent asthma who were previously treated with low doses of triamcinolone acetonide (TAA) 400 to 800 microg/day or beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) 168 to 336 microg/day were randomized to treatment with FP aerosol 88 microg BID (FP, n = 221) or zafirlukast 20 mg BID (n = 216) over 6 weeks. RESULTS: Treatment with FP significantly increased the mean change at endpoint (the last post-baseline observation) in FEV1 (0.22 L versus 0.03 L, P < .001), morning PEF (17.8 versus 3.1 L/min, P = .004), evening PEF (16.7 versus 2.6 L/min, P = .002), the percentage of symptom-free days (16.2 versus 7.1%, P = .007), and the percentage of rescue-free days (23.4 versus 9.3%, P < .001), and significantly decreased rescue albuterol use (-0.66 puffs/day versus an increase of 0.27 puffs/day, P < .001) and combined symptom scores (-0.13 versus an increase of 0.08, P < .001) compared with zafirlukast. Treatment with FP maintained the percentage of awakening-free nights (-1.0 +/- 1.0); in contrast, treatment with zafirlukast reduced the percentage of awakening-free nights (-9.0 +/- 1.6, P < .001). A clinically meaningful difference (change of > or = 0.5; P < .001) was observed between FP and zafirlukast in the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) global score and for each domain score except activity limitation (change of 0.3, P < .001). Significantly more patients in the zafirlukast group experienced an asthma exacerbation (n = 14) compared with FP-treated patients (n = 5, P = .035). Patients in the zafirlukast group were significantly more likely to be withdrawn due to lack of efficacy (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Switching patients from low doses of inhaled corticosteroids to a lower total microgram dose of FP improves pulmonary function, asthma symptoms, and quality of life, while switching to the leukotriene receptor antagonist zafirlukast may result in worsening of asthma control. This was indicated by the significant number of zafirlukast-treated patients who were dropped from the study due to lack of efficacy within 6 weeks of discontinuing inhaled corticosteroids.     

Adherence with montelukast or fluticasone in a long-term clinical trial: results from the mild asthma montelukast versus inhaled corticosteroid trial

BACKGROUND: Nonadherence with asthma therapy is common and may contribute to poor clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of dosing frequency and mode of delivery of therapy on adherence and clinical outcomes. METHODS: We examined adherence in patients with mild persistent asthma (15-85 years) enrolled in a randomized study of montelukast (10 mg once daily) or fluticasone (88 microg, 2 puffs twice daily) during a 12-week double-blind treatment period (DB), followed by a 36-week open-label trial (OL). Adherence was monitored using eDEM for montelukast/placebo and MDILog devices for fluticasone/placebo. RESULTS: Participants used at least 1 puff of inhaled therapy on 83.3% DB/76.8% OL of days and at least 1 dose of oral therapy on 77.5%/71.4% of days (P < .0001). Subjects used inhaled therapy less than prescribed on 49.5%/57.5% of days, compared with 22.5%/28.6% of days for oral therapy (P < .0001). In the DB, a dose-response relationship was observed with fluticasone and asthma rescue-free days (P = .02) and FEV(1) percent predicted (P < .01) only for patients with FEV(1) < or = 86%. In the OL period, a dose-response relationship was observed with fluticasone and FEV(1) percent predicted (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Whereas subjects were more likely to use inhaled fluticasone/placebo at least once a day, subjects were more likely to take once-daily oral montelukast/placebo as prescribed. Clinical outcomes were inconsistently associated with adherence levels. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Patients were less likely to be fully adherent with twice-daily therapy than with once-daily therapy, but most still achieved adequate asthma control.     

Omalizumab is effective in the long-term control of severe allergic asthma.

BACKGROUND: Previous reports show that addition of omalizumab to standard therapy reduces asthma exacerbations and simultaneously decreases use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) and rescue medication in patients with allergic asthma. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of omalizumab on long-term disease control in patients with severe allergic asthma. METHODS: The present study concerns the 24-week, double-blind extension phase to a previous 28-week core study in which patients received subcutaneous omalizumab or matching placebo (at least 0.016 mg/kg/IgE [IU/mL] every 4 weeks) for 16 weeks in addition to their existing ICS therapy (beclomethasone dipropionate [BDP]; steroid-stable phase), followed by a 12-week phase in which controlled attempts were made to gradually reduce ICS therapy (steroid-reduction phase). During the extension phase patients were maintained on randomized treatment (omalizumab or placebo) and the lowest sustainable dose of BDP. The use of other asthma medications was permitted during the extension phase. Investigators were also allowed to switch patients from BDP to other ICS medications if considered necessary. RESULTS: A total of 460 patients (omalizumab, n = 245; placebo, n = 215) entered the extension phase. Overall, omalizumab-treated patients experienced significantly fewer exacerbations vs placebo during the extension phase (0.60 and 0.83 exacerbations per patient, respectively; P = 0.023), despite a sustained significant reduction in their use of ICS (mean BDP equivalent dose: omalizumab, 227 microg/d; placebo, 335 microg/d; P < 0.001). Treatment with omalizumab was well tolerated and the incidence of adverse events was similar in both treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that omalizumab is effective in the long-term control of severe allergic asthma.     

Effects of treatment with mometasone furoate dry powder inhaler in children with persistent asthma.

BACKGROUND: Mometasone furoate dry powder inhaler (DPI) has been shown to effectively treat asthma in children. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 2 dosing regimens of mometasone furoate DPI in the treatment of mild-to-moderate persistent asthma in children previously using inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs). METHODS: A 12-week, multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study evaluated 2 dosing regimens of mometasone furoate DPI (100 microg every evening and 100 microg twice daily) in 296 children 4 to 11 years old with asthma previously using ICSs. The primary efficacy variable was the change in percentage of predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) from baseline to end point. Secondary efficacy variables included absolute FEV1, forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% forced vital capacity, morning and evening peak expiratory flow, asthma symptom scores, albuterol use, nocturnal awakenings, response to therapy, and health-related quality of life. RESULTS: Mean changes from baseline at end point in predicted FEV1 were 4.73 and 5.52 percentage points for mometasone furoate DPI, 100 microg every evening and 100 microg twice daily, respectively, the difference of which was not significant, and -1.77 percentage points for placebo (P < or = .002). Significant improvements in secondary efficacy variables were also observed for both mometasone furoate DPI treatments over placebo. Both mometasone furoate DPI doses were well tolerated, and no significant differences were noted among the 3 treatment groups in adverse event reporting. CONCLUSIONS: Both mometasone furoate DPI doses were well tolerated and significantly improved lung function, maintained effective asthma control, and improved quality of life in children with asthma.     

Mometasone furoate: efficacy and safety in moderate asthma compared with beclomethasone dipropionate.

BACKGROUND: Mometasone furoate (MF) is a new inhaled glucocorticoid administered by dry powder inhaler (DPI). OBJECTIVE: MF-DPI was evaluated for safety and efficacy and compared with placebo DPI and beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) administered by metered dose inhaler (MDI) in the treatment of patients with moderate persistent asthma. METHODS: Eligible patients (n = 227), 13 to 75 years of age, maintained on inhaled glucocorticoids before entering the trial, were randomized to receive: MF-DPI, 100 microg, twice daily, MF-DPI, 200 microg, twice daily, BDP MDI, 168 microg, twice daily, or placebo in a 12-week, multicenter, double-blind study. RESULTS: At endpoint, FEV1 (primary efficacy variable) significantly improved for all three active treatments compared with placebo (P < .01, all comparisons). The response to MF-DPI, 200 microg, twice daily treatment was approximately twice as large as the response to MF-DPI, 100 microg, twice daily or BDP MDI treatment, although the differences between these groups did not reach statistical significance. Secondary efficacy variables including PEFR, asthma symptoms, nocturnal awakenings, and albuterol use showed similar trends. The MF-DPI, 100 microg, twice daily and BDP MDI, 168 microg, twice daily treatment groups produced comparable results for all efficacy variables. CONCLUSIONS: MF-DPI, 100 microg and 200 microg, twice daily were well-tolerated and significantly improved lung function and symptom control in the treatment of patients with moderate persistent asthma. In this study, MF-DPI, 200 microg, twice daily seemed to be the most effective dosage.     

Step-down and step-up therapy in moderate persistent asthma

BACKGROUND: A step-down therapy may be more beneficial for the management of asthma than a step-up therapy. METHODS: Eighty-two asthmatic patients with moderate persistent asthma were enrolled in the study and randomized into three groups. One group of patients received 400 microg/day of beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) for 4 weeks and then 800 microg/day for another 4 weeks (step-up group). The other two groups of patients received 1,200 microg/day of BDP for 4 weeks with or without short-term oral steroid (prednisolone, 0.5 mg/day for 1 week) and then 800 microg/day for another 4 weeks (step-down group). Severe exacerbation of asthma, asthma symptoms, respiratory function and rescue use of inhaled beta(2)-agonists were monitored. If asthma was well controlled, the dose of BDP was decreased every 3 months and if asthma was exacerbated, the dose of BDP was increased until 8 months after the initial treatment. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients during the run-in period, 4 patients in the step-up group, 2 patients in the step-down group treated with a high dose of BDP and no patients in the step-down group with oral steroids during first 4 weeks dropped out because of severe exacerbation of asthma. Although asthma symptoms and respiratory function significantly improved 8 weeks after the therapy in all groups, more significant and prompt improvements of these parameters were observed in patients of the step-down group than in patients of the step-up group after the first 2 weeks of treatment. Furthermore, step-down therapy with short-term oral steroid resulted in the lowest maintenance doses of BDP at 8 months of the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that step-down therapy starting with a high dose of inhaled steroid and short-term oral steroid is more effective in gaining prompt control of asthma and reducing the severe exacerbation of asthma and the maintenance dose of inhaled steroids than a step-up therapy starting with a low dose of inhaled steroids in patients with moderate persistent asthma.