首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
目的 比较培美曲塞或长春瑞滨联合顺铂一线治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的疗效及毒副反应。方法 回顾性分析我院2008年1月至2010年12月收治的68例晚期NSCLC患者,分别接受培美曲塞联合顺铂(PC方案组,32例)或长春瑞滨联合顺铂(NP方案组,36例)一线治疗。PC方案组:培美曲塞500mg/m2,d1;顺铂 25mg/m2,d1~d3。NP方案组:长春瑞滨 25mg/m2,d1、d8,顺铂25mg/m2,d1~d3。每3周为1周期,每2个周期评价疗效。结果 所有患者均可评价近期疗效。两组均无完全缓解病例,PC方案组与NP方案组的有效率(RR)分别为40.6%(13/32)和36.1%(13/36),疾病控制率(DCR)分别为71.9%(23/32)和61.1%(22/36),两组RR和DCR的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组中位疾病进展时间(TTP)分别为6.2和5.2个月,组间差异无统计意义(P>0.05)。NP方案组3~4级白细胞减少、中性粒细胞减少的发生率高于PC方案组(P<0.05)。 结论 培美曲塞联合顺铂与长春瑞滨联合顺铂一线治疗晚期NSCLC的疗效相当,但培美曲塞的毒副反应较少。  相似文献   

2.
周彩存  郑迪  张捷  鲁冰  张洁  吕梅君  徐建芳 《肿瘤》2005,25(2):170-172
目的比较长春瑞宾联合顺铂和丝裂霉素(MNP)和长春瑞宾联合顺铂(NP)一线治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的疗效与安全性.方法65例经细胞学或病理确诊的NSCLC患者分别接受MNP或NP方案化疗.长春瑞宾25 mg/m2静注,d18 c;顺铂为75 mg/m2,静脉滴注d1;MNP方案中丝裂霉素用法为6 mg/m2,静注第1天.两方案均每3周重复,两周期后评价疗效,并随访毒副反应.结果两组中位化疗周期数均为3.NP组PR为11例,总体有效率为33%;PD 5例(15%);MNP组PR为12例(38%),PD为5例(16%),与NP组相比,差异无显著性(P>0.05).常见副反应有白细胞减少、贫血、便秘、恶心、呕吐等.MNP组Ⅲ与Ⅳ度白细胞减少症发生率高达41%;有3例因中性粒细胞减少并发感染而发热,其中1例死亡.NP与MNP组中位生存期分别为12与11个月,差异无统计学意义.结论长春瑞宾联合顺铂和丝裂霉素一线治疗晚期NSCLC在疗效上不优于长春瑞宾联合顺铂,毒副反应增加;不应作为晚期NSCLC的常规一线方案.  相似文献   

3.
Zhang W  Cao JN  Yin JL  Hong XN  Xu LG 《中华肿瘤杂志》2003,25(6):587-589
目的 评价长春瑞滨联合顺铂治疗既往使用紫杉类的晚期非小细胞肺癌的疗效和毒性。方法  3 0例既往紫杉类药物治疗过的ⅢB或Ⅳ期非小细胞肺癌患者 ,体能状况评分 (ECOG) 0~ 1分。 15例用NP方案 (长春瑞滨 +顺铂 )治疗 ,15例用MVP方案 (丝裂霉素 +长春地辛 +顺铂 )治疗。结果 NP组和MVP组有效率分别为 13 .3 %和 0 (P >0 .0 5)。NP组患者疾病进展时间较MVP组长(分别为 6个月和 3个月 ,P <0 .0 5) ,NP组中位生存时间较MVP组长 (分别为 9个月和 6个月 ,P <0 .0 5) ,NP组 1年生存率 (40 .0 % )明显高于对照组 (0 ,P <0 .0 5)。两组Ⅲ、Ⅳ度不良反应差异无显著性 (P >0 .0 5) ,患者可以耐受。结论 NP方案对既往使用紫杉类的、体能状况较好的晚期非小细胞肺癌患者有一定疗效 ,可使患者疾病进展推迟 ,中位生存期延长 ,1年生存率提高 ,且毒性可耐受  相似文献   

4.
目的评价泽菲联合盖诺治疗不能耐受顺铂的中晚期非小细胞肺癌的疗效和毒性反应。方法74例中晚期非小细胞肺癌既往均未曾放疗或化疗。PS评分≤3分,生存期超过3个月,随机分为GN组25例(泽菲联合盖诺),NP组24例(盖诺加顺铂),GP组25例(泽菲加顺铂)。结果GN组、NP组和GP组有效率分别为44.0%、37.5%和44.0%,差异无显著性(P〉0.05)。GN组与另两组在Ⅲ、Ⅳ度血液学毒性方面比较差异无显著性(P〉0.05),GN组非血液学毒性比较少(P〈0.05)。结论GN方案疗效较好且毒性较低,故尤其适合于不能耐受顺铂的晚期非小细胞肺癌患者。  相似文献   

5.
Aim of this study was to determine the activity and toxicity of a sequential chemotherapy regimen in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Fifty-one previously untreated stage IIIB/IV NSCLC patients were enrolled to receive two cycles of cisplatin plus paclitaxel (80/175 mg/m(2) every 21 days), followed by two cycles of vinorelbine (30 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 every 21 days), followed by two cycles of gemcitabine (1000 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days). Forty-one patients (82%) completed the planned six cycles. Grade 3-4 neutropenia was the major toxicity (41% of patients) and it was mainly associated with vinorelbine administration. Response rate after cisplatin plus paclitaxel was 18%; this percentage increased to 41% after vinorelbine, and it reached 43% upon completion of the entire six cycle treatment program. Median survival time was 14.4 months, 1-year survival rate was 53%, and 2-year survival rate was 18%. Median time to disease progression was 6.8 months. This sequential chemotherapy regimen is feasible and active in patients with advanced NSCLC. This pilot experience provides the basis for an ongoing randomized phase III trial comparing our sequential regimen versus cisplatin plus gemcitabine.  相似文献   

6.
PURPOSE: to evaluate the activity and toxicity of the combination cisplatin plus vinorelbine plus amifostine in advanced non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: a two-stage Simon design was applied. To proceed after the first stage, responses from seven of 19 patients were needed. Overall, 17 responses from 40 treated patients were required to comply with the design parameter. Inclusion criteria were cyto-histologically proven stage IIIB-IV NSCLC; age of 70 years or less; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 2 or less; normal cardiac, hepatic, renal and bone marrow functions; and no previous chemotherapy. Patients were staged by physical examination, biochemistry, chest radiograph, brain, thoracic and abdominal computed tomographic (CT) scans, and bone scan. All patients received cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) intravenously (iv) day 1, vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) iv days 1-8-15-22, amifostine 740 mg/m(2) iv day 1 every 4 weeks up to six cycles. Eleven of 40 enrolled patients were stage IIIB and 29 stage IV, with a median age of 57 years (range, 38-70 years). RESULTS: all patients were evaluable for response and toxicity (intention to treat analysis). We observed 20 (50%) objective responses, with four (10%) complete responses. Median time to progression was 20 weeks, and median survival was 45 weeks. The toxicity was manageable. The reported main toxicities were neutropenia grade 4 in 10% of patients, grade 1 and grade 3 nephrotoxicity both in 5% of patients and grade 1 amifostine-related hypotension in 15% of patients. CONCLUSION: these data show that cisplatin plus vinorelbine plus amifostine is an active and feaseable regimen in stage IIIB-IV NSCLC. A phase III trial comparing cisplatin plus vinorelbine versus cisplatin plus vinorelbine plus amifostine in advanced NSCLC is warranted.  相似文献   

7.
 目的 比较分析并探讨长春瑞滨(NVB)联合吉西他滨(GEM)的GN方案与NVB联合顺铂(DDP)的NP方案治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的疗效及患者不良反应。方法 回顾性分析经组织学证实的56例晚期NSCLC患者,GN组27例:NVB+GEM,每3周 1个周期×2~6个周期,NP组29例:NVB+DDP,每3周1个周期×2~6个周期。结果 GN组总有效率37.0 %,肿瘤控制率59.3 %,中位疾病进展期5.1个月,1年生存率40.7 %,其疗效与NP组接近,差异无统计学意义(P >0.05),但GN组在血红蛋白下降、Ⅱ度以上恶心、呕吐及体力下降三项不良反应方面发生率明显低于NP组,两组之间不良反应统计差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 非铂类GN方案疗效高、毒性低、耐受性好,作为晚期NSCLC患者的一线替代方案值得进一步研究。  相似文献   

8.
 目的 观察长春瑞滨 (NVB)和顺铂 (DDP)联合治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌 (NSCLC)的临床疗效及毒副作用。方法  160例Ⅲb~Ⅳ期初次治疗的非小细胞肺癌 ,用NVB联合DDP(NP方案 )治疗 :NVB2 5mg/m2 ,静滴d1,8,DDP 80mg/m2 静滴d1。结果 有效率 (CR +PR) 55.6% ,中位缓解期 6.2个月。中位生存期 12 .2个月。主要毒副反应为骨髓抑制。结论 NP方案治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌疗效高 ,副反应少 ,病人可耐受 ,值得临床作为一线治疗推广  相似文献   

9.
NP和GP方案治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌疗效比较   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1  
[目的]探讨吉西他滨联合顺铂方案(GP)及异长春花碱联合顺铂方案(NP)治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的疗效及毒副反应.[方法]晚期非小细胞肺癌35例采用GP方案,38例采用NP方案,治疗2个周期后评价疗效及毒副反应.[结果]总有效率GP组为45.8%,NP组为52.6%;中位生存期分别为10.5和9.9个月,两组比较无显著性差异(P>0.05).主要的毒副反应为血液毒性.[结论]GP和NP方案治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌疗效肯定且相似,毒副反应可以耐受.  相似文献   

10.
姜维美  蒋华  陈谦 《陕西肿瘤医学》2008,(12):2107-2109
目的:探讨吉西他滨联合顺铂(GP)及去甲长春花碱联合顺铂(NP)方案治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的疗效及毒副反应。方法:晚期非小细胞肺癌30例以GP方案、27例以NP方案化疗,治疗2周期后评价疗效和不良反应。结果:有效率GP组46.7%,NP组为44.4%;中位生存期11.8个月和9.5个月;1年生存率为63.6%和59.1%,两组无统计学差异(P〉0.05),主要不良反应为血液学毒性。结论:GP和NP方案治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的疗效肯定且相似,二者的不良反应可以耐受。  相似文献   

11.
GP 和 NP 方案治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的对照研究   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1  
姜维美  蒋华  陈谦 《现代肿瘤医学》2008,16(12):2107-2109
目的:探讨吉西他滨联合顺铂(GP)及去甲长春花碱联合顺铂(NP)方案治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的疗效及毒副反应。方法:晚期非小细胞肺癌30例以GP方案、27例以NP方案化疗,治疗2周期后评价疗效和不良反应。结果:有效率GP组46.7%,NP组为44.4%;中位生存期11.8个月和9.5个月;1年生存率为63.6%和59.1%,两组无统计学差异(P〉0.05),主要不良反应为血液学毒性。结论:GP和NP方案治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的疗效肯定且相似,二者的不良反应可以耐受。  相似文献   

12.
The aim of the study was to evaluate the activity of cisplatin (CDDP) plus vinorelbine (VNR) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) progressing after paclitaxel plus gemcitabine. Treatment consisted of CDDP 80 mg/m(2) administered on day 1 and VNR 25 mg/m(2) administered on day 1 and 8, repeated every 3 weeks. Nine patients who relapsed after partial response and eight patients refractory to prior CT received a minimum of two treatment cycles: three patients achieved a PR (18%; 95% CI: 4-43%), four had stable disease and 10 had disease progression. All responses were observed among the nine patients responsive to prior treatment. Median survival was 35 weeks. No patients required dose-reduction, treatment discontinuation or delay because of toxicity. Our results indicate a reasonable antitumor efficacy and no relevant toxicity of a second-line CDDP-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. We recommend the use of this regimen for patients not refractory to primary treatment.  相似文献   

13.
The role of docetaxel-containing doublets as first-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced and metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was evaluated in a large randomized trial. Docetaxel/cisplatin and docetaxel/carboplatin were compared with the reference regimen of vinorelbine/cisplatin. After adjustment for imbalances in prognostic factors, the overall survival of patients treated with docetaxel/cisplatin was significantly better than that of patients treated with vinorelbine/cisplatin, the reference regimen. Survival for patients on the docetaxel/carboplatin arm was noninferior to the same reference regimen. The major grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity was neutropenia, which affected approximately three fourths of the participants. Overall, the docetaxel/platinum arms were well tolerated. Both docetaxel/carboplatin and docetaxel/cisplatin appear to be effective first-line chemotherapy combinations for advanced NSCLC and are efficacious treatment options in this setting. The future of NSCLC therapy might lie in the development of novel treatment paradigms that involve the integration of targeted agents with traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy.  相似文献   

14.
沙利度胺联合化疗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的随机研究   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1  
目的 评价血管生成抑制剂沙利度胺联合化疗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的临床疗效及不良反应.方法 66例NSCLC随机分为治疗组和对照组.治疗组采用NP方案+沙利度胺治疗,长春瑞滨25~30 mg/m2,静滴,第1、8天;顺铂70~80 nc,/m2,静滴,第1天;沙利度胺200 mg/d,口服,第1天起连续给药.对照组采用NP方案化疗,剂量、方法与治疗组相同.结果 治疗组和对照组的有效率分别为51.5%和36.4%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).治疗组和对照组的中位疾病进展时间(TTP)分别为6.0个月和3.6个月,治疗组的中位TTP显著延长(P=0.0005).治疗组和对照组间毒副反应发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗组患者治疗后生活质量评分较对照组有提高,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 沙利度胺与NP方案具有协同作用,联合应用能显著提高晚期NSCLC患者的中位TTP,且不增加治疗后不良反应的发生率.  相似文献   

15.
TC与NP方案治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的疗效对比观察   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1  
目的 比较紫杉醇(PTX)加卡铂(CBP)(TC方案)与长春瑞滨(NVB)加顺铂(DDP)(NP方案)治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌(NsCLC)的疗效和不良反应。方法 56例初治晚期NSCLC依照患者就诊化疗的先后顺序随机分入TC组和NP组,化疗2周期后进行评价。结果 TC组完全缓解率为10.7%,部分缓解率为42.9%,总有效率为53.6%,NP组完全缓解率为7.1%,部分缓解率为42.9%,总有效率为50.0%,2组疗效无显著性差异(P〉0.05)。TC组胃肠道反应、肾毒性和肌肉关节疼痛发生率均比NP组低,有显著性差异(P〈0.05)。结论 TC方案和NP方案均可作为治疗晚期NSCLC的一线化疗方案。  相似文献   

16.
目的:观察抗肿瘤新药国产长春瑞滨(NVB盖诺)加顺铂(DDP)联合化疗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的疗效。方法:治疗NSCLC48例。男性34例,女性14例。病理类型以腺癌为主(28例)。结果:部分缓解(PR)21例,稳定(NC)24例,进展(PD)3例,总有效率47.92%。盖诺的剂量限制毒性为骨髓抑制,白细胞下降占81.25%。局部疼痛或静脉炎发生率29.17%。结论:以盖诺为主联合化疗治疗晚期NSCLC的有效率高,毒性可以耐受,是一个有前途的抗肿瘤新药。  相似文献   

17.
Purpose: Improving chemotherapeutic efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) will require the development of new strategies to better use currently available agents. To assess the efficacy and safety of a biweekly regimen of cisplatin, gemcitabine and vinorelbine for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Methods: Patients with selected stage IIIb (pleural effusion)/stage IV NSCLC, performance status of 0–2 and normal organ function were eligible. Treatment consisted of cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 1 plus gemcitabine, 1,000 mg/m2 and vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15 every 28 days. Results: Of the 40 patients enrolled and assessable for response, there were five (12.5%) with confirmed complete response and 14 (35%) with a confirmed partial response for an overall response rate of 47.5%. Nine patients had stable disease while 12 (30%) progressed. Median progression-free survival and overall survival for all patients were 6.3 and 11.1 months, respectively. Toxicity was principally hematologic, with grade 3–4 neutropenia in 30%, and grade 3–4 nausea/vomiting in 22.5%. There were no treatment-related deaths. Conclusions: The biweekly regimen of cisplatin, gemcitabine and vinorelbine is associated with a high rate of response, lesser toxicity than other three-drug regimens and no benefit of survival. Therefore, the regimen under study may be an appealing alternative when considering other treatment modalities for advanced lung cancer, such as neoadjuvant therapy.  相似文献   

18.
PURPOSE:: to evaluate the combination of vinorelbine, ifosfamide and cisplatin(VIP) in patients with advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS:: Seventy-six untreated patients with stages IIIB-IV NSCLC; thechemotherapy regimen consisted of vinorelbine (25 mg/sqm ondays 1 and 8), ifosfamide (3 g/sqm on day 1 with uroprotectivemesna), and cisplatin (80 mg/sqm on day 1). The cycles wereadministered on an out patient basis every 3 weeks. RESULTS:: Leukopenia was the most frequent toxicity: grades 3–4neutropenia was observed in 26% of the cycles and 19 episodesof febrile neutropenia were reported in 289 evaluable courses.Filgrastim 5 µg/kg was administered in 27% of the courses.Sixty-seven of 76 patients were evaluable for response: theoverall response rate was 51% (95% confidence interval 35%–%)with 2 complete responses (3%) and 32 (48%) partial responses.No significant differences in response rate were observed accordingto histology or stage of disease. The median time to progressionwas 6 months (range 1 to 29+) and the median overall survival10 months (range 1–33+). CONCLUSION:: The combination of vinorelbine, ifosfamide and cisplatin inthe dose and schedule employed in this trial shows an interestingresponse rate with acceptable toxicities. This regimen shouldbe tested in the multimodality therapy of stage IIIA/B NSCLC. vinorelbine, ifosfamide, cisplatin, non-small-cell, lung cancer  相似文献   

19.
铂类为基础的3种化疗方案治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1  
目的 :观察 3种常用的抗癌药 (长春瑞滨、吉西他滨和紫杉醇 )联合铂类方案治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的疗效及毒副反应。方法 :经组织学证实的 70例晚期非小细胞肺癌患者 ,分为 3组化疗。PC组 :紫杉醇 135mg/m2 ,静滴 3小时 ,第 1天 ,卡铂按药时曲线下面积 (AUC)等于 5计算 ,静滴 ,第 2天 ,每 3周为一周期 ;NP组 :长春瑞宾2 5mg/ (m2·d)静注 ,第 1、8天 ,顺铂 75mg/m2 静滴 ,第 1天 ,每 3周为 1周期 ;GP组 :吉西他滨 10 0 0mg/ (m2 ·d)静滴 30分钟第 1、8、15天 ,顺铂 75mg/m2 静滴第 1天 ,每 4周为一周期。连续应用 2周期后评价疗效及不良反应。结果 :PC组 (n =2 4 )总有效率 (10 / 2 4 ) 4 1.7% ;NP组 (n =2 5 )总有效率 (10 / 2 5 ) 4 0 % ;GP组 (n =2 1)总有效率 (9/ 2 1) 4 2 .9% ,各组间比较总有效率差异无统计学意义 (P >0 .0 5 ) ;毒副反应方面 ,3组白细胞下降及贫血相近 ,NP组血小板降低较其他两组轻 ,PC组胃肠道反应及肾功能损害较其他两组轻 ,但外周神经毒性较其他两组多。结论 :作为晚期非小细胞肺癌一线治疗 ,PC、NP、GP 3种方案疗效相似 ,但 3种方案毒性存在差异 ,应根据患者个体情况进行选择。  相似文献   

20.
长春瑞滨加奥沙利铂治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床研究   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1  
目的观察长春瑞滨(Vinorelbine,商品名:盖诺)加奥沙利铂(Oxaliplatin,商品名:艾恒)联合化疗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的临床效果和毒副反应.方法 26例晚期非小细胞肺癌患者采用盖诺25 mg/m2静脉推注,第1、8天;艾恒130 mg/m2,静脉滴注4 h,第1天,21~28 d重复.结果全组部分缓解(PR)9例,稳定(SD)12例,进展(PD)5例,总有效率(RR)为34.6%.主要毒副反应为骨髓抑制(Ⅲ~Ⅳ度白细胞减少发生率为42.3%)、神经毒性(80.8%)及恶心呕吐(42.3%)等.结论长春瑞滨加奥沙利铂联合化疗方案治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的疗效较高,耐受性好,值得临床进一步研究.  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号