Does malperfusion syndrome affect early and mid-term outcome in patients suffering from acute type A aortic dissection?

It is well known that malperfusion syndrome (MPS) increases early mortality of patients suffering from acute type A aortic dissection (AADA). The aim of the present study was to analyze the outcome of patients who survived after surgical treatment of AADA with or without MPS. Data of 227 consecutive patients, who underwent surgery for AADA, were analyzed. The impact of MPS on in-hospital data and outcome was analyzed. Quality of life (QoL), using the short form 36 health survey questionnaire (SF-36), and late mortality were analyzed. Seventy-five patients (33%) with AADA had preoperative MPS. In 31 patients (41.3%), central nervous system (CNS) was involved and in 33 patients (44%) MPS of the extremities was present. Coronary malperfusion was found in 9 patients, renal in 8 patients and visceral malperfusion in 5 patients. Mean age in the group with MPS was 61.9+/-9.1 compared to 61.6+/-12.7 years without MPS (P=ns). In-hospital mortality was 18.7% in patients with MPS, compared to 9.9% without MPS (P<0.05). Follow-up revealed a significant poorer outcome in patients with MPS, with a 3-year-survival of 73.3% in patients with MPS and 86.2% without MPS (P<0.05). Average SF-36 values were lower in patients with MPS (78.3+/-12.8 vs. 87.8+/-11.9; P=ns), which is mainly due to patients with CNS-MPS, who showed an average SF-36 of 65.8+/-17.9 (P<0.05). AADA associated to MPS carries a higher early- and mid-term mortality. Postoperative mid-term QoL, however, except in patients with CNS-MPS and persistent neurological deficits, is fairly good and similar to patients who underwent successful surgery for AADA without MPS.     

Valve-preserving operation in acute aortic dissection type A

BACKGROUND: The standard treatment in patients with acute aortic dissection type A (AADA) and aortic regurgitation is either supracommissural aortic or composite replacement of ascending aorta and valve. Valve-preserving surgical procedures provide a promising alternative. We retrospectively analyzed midterm results after these different approaches. METHODS: From October 1995 to December 1999, 52 patients (35 men, 17 women) underwent repair of AADA. Patient ages ranged from 30 to 83 years. Composite replacement was chosen for degenerated aortic valves or prior valve replacement (group A; n = 8). With normal root diameter, supracommissural replacement of the ascending aorta was performed (group B; n = 22). For preexisting root dilatation the aortic root was either remodeled (root diameter 30 to 50 mm, group C; n = 17) or the valve reimplanted within a vascular graft (root diameter more than 50 mm, group D; n = 5). RESULTS: All patients underwent either proximal (n = 46) or total (n = 6) arch replacement under circulatory arrest. Eight patients (15.4%) died (group A: n = 3; group B: n = 3; group C: n = 2). Freedom from aortic regurgitation of grade 2 or more at 2 years was 100% in groups A and D, 90.9% in group C, and 75% following supracommissural replacement. At 2 years freedom from proximal reoperation was 100% in groups A, C, and D and 84.5% in group B. CONCLUSIONS: In AADA valve-preserving root replacement leads to improved stability of aortic valve function without an increased operative risk. Midterm results are promising and may show further superiority over supracommissural aortic replacement in the future.     

Temporary neurological dysfunction after surgery of the thoracic aorta: a predictor of poor outcome and impaired quality of life

BACKGROUND: Transient neurological dysfunction (TND) consists of postoperative confusion, delirium and agitation. It is underestimated after surgery on the thoracic aorta and its influence on long-term quality of life (QoL) has not yet been studied. This study aimed to assess the influence of TND on short- and long-term outcome following surgery of the ascending aorta and proximal arch. METHODS: Nine hundred and seven patients undergoing surgery of the ascending aorta and the proximal aortic arch at our institution were included. Two hundred and ninety patients (31.9%) underwent surgery because of acute aortic dissection type A (AADA) and 617 patients because of aortic aneurysm. In 547 patients (60.3%) the distal anastomosis was performed using deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA). TND was defined as a Glasgow coma scale (GCS) value <13. All surviving patients had a clinical follow up and QoL was assessed with an SF-36 questionnaire. RESULTS: Overall in-hospital mortality was 8.3%. TND occurred in 89 patients (9.8%). As compared to patients without TND, those who suffered from TND were older (66.4 vs 59.9 years, p<0.01) underwent more frequently emergent procedures (53% vs 32%, p<0.05) and surgery under DHCA (84.3% vs 57.7%, p<0.05). However, duration of DHCA and extent of surgery did not influence the incidence of TND. In-hospital mortality in the group of patients with TND compared to the group without TND was similar (12.0% vs 11.4%; p=ns). Patients with TND suffered more frequently from coronary artery disease (28% vs 20.8%, p=ns) and were more frequently admitted in a compromised haemodynamic condition (23.6% vs 9.9%, p<0.05). Postoperative course revealed more pulmonary complications such as prolonged mechanical ventilation. Additional to their transient neurological dysfunction, significantly more patients had strokes with permanent neurological loss of function (14.6% vs 4.8%, p<0.05) compared to the patients without TND. ICU and hospital stay were significantly prolonged in TND patients (18+/-13 days vs 12+/-7 days, p<0.05). Over a mean follow-up interval of 27+/-14 months, patients with TND showed a significantly impaired QoL. CONCLUSION: The neurological outcome following surgery of the ascending aorta and proximal aortic arch is of paramount importance. The impact of TND on short- and long-term outcome is underestimated and negatively affects the short- and long-term outcome.     

Is hemiarch replacement adequate in acute type A aortic dissection repair in patients with arch branch vessel dissection without cerebral malperfusion?

ObjectiveThe study objective was to determine if hemiarch replacement is an adequate arch management strategy for patients with acute type A aortic dissection and arch branch vessel dissection but no cerebral malperfusion.MethodsFrom January 2008 to August 2019, 479 patients underwent open acute type A aortic dissection repair. After excluding those with aggressive arch replacement (n = 168), cerebral malperfusion syndrome (n = 34), and indeterminable arch branch vessel dissection (n = 1), 276 patients with an acute type A aortic dissection without cerebral malperfusion syndrome who underwent hemiarch replacement comprised this study. Patients were then divided into those with arch branch vessel dissection (n = 133) and those with no arch branch vessel dissection (n = 143).ResultsThe median age of the entire cohort was 62 years, with the arch branch vessel dissection group being younger (60 vs 62 years, P = .048). Both groups had similar aortic arch and descending thoracic aortic diameters, with significantly more DeBakey type I dissections (100% vs 80%) in the arch branch vessel dissection group. The arch branch vessel dissection group had more aortic root replacement (36% vs 27%, P = .0035) and longer aortic crossclamp times (153 vs 128 minutes, P = .007). Postoperative outcomes were similar between the arch branch vessel dissection and no arch branch vessel dissection groups, including stroke (10% vs 5%, P = .12) and operative morality (7% vs 5%, P = .51). The arch branch vessel dissection group had a significantly greater cumulative incidence of reoperation (8-year: 19% vs 4%, P = .04) with a hazard ratio of 2.89 (95% confidence interval, 1.01-8.27; P = .048), which was similar between groups among only DeBakey type I dissections (8-year: 19% vs 5%, P = .11). The 8-year survival was similar between the arch branch vessel dissection and no arch branch vessel dissection groups (76% vs 74%, P = .30).ConclusionsHemiarch replacement was adequate for patients with acute type A aortic dissection with arch branch vessel dissection without cerebral malperfusion syndrome, but carried a higher risk of late reoperation.     

Perioperative risk factors for mortality in patients with acute type A aortic dissection

BACKGROUND: This study was undertaken to identify the perioperative risk factors for death in patients with acute type A aortic dissection (AADA). METHODS: Between 1993 and 2001, 108 consecutive patients (86 men; mean age, 53 years) underwent emergent operations for AADA. All patients but 2 underwent replacement of the ascending aorta with an open distal anastomosis during a period of hypothermic circulatory arrest. In addition, 22 patients had hemiarch and 5 had total arch replacement. Aortic root was replaced in 20 and repaired with gelatin-resorcinol-formaldehyde glue in 39 patients; aortic valve was separately replaced in 3, resuspended in 24, and remained untouched in 22 patients. RESULTS: Overall in-hospital mortality was 25%. Mortality rate was significantly higher in patients with preoperative dissection complications than in those without (21/36 [58%] vs 6/72 [8%], p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, predictors of mortality were presence of rupture, renal failure, and intestinal malperfusion, duration of cardiopulmonary bypass > or = 200 minutes, blood loss > or = 500 mL, and transfusion of blood > or = 4 units. Location of the intimal tear, extent of the replacement, type of the aortic root repair, and duration of hypothermic circulatory arrest did not emerge as predictors of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Major determinants of surgical mortality in patients with AADA are preoperative complications. Earlier diagnosis remains essential to improve the survival rate.     

Effects of ascending aorta replacement on aortic root dilatation.

OBJECTIVE: Because of an increase of aortic root wall stress, prosthetic replacement of the ascending aorta might be a risk factor for the progressive increase of the aortic root dimension. Aim of the present study was to evaluate the aortic root diameter change and the progression of aortic valve regurgitation late after ascending aorta replacement for different ethiology. METHODS: Sixty-three late survivors after supracoronary ascending aortic replacement were evaluated. Forty-one patients were operated on for acute aortic dissecting aneurysm (group I) and 22 for chronic atherosclerotic non-dissecting aneurysm (group II). Aortic root diameter and aortic valve regurgitation were assessed echocardiografically after a mean follow-up of 63+/-31 months and were compared with those early after surgery. RESULTS: Seven patients of group I (17%) needed reoperation for aortic root dilatation or dissection. Twenty-five percent of the patients (15 of group I and 1 of group II) showed at least a 10% increase in aortic root diameter at follow-up (46.8+/-6.1 vs. 38.1+/-6.1mm, P<0.0001). Aortic root diameter increased almost exclusively in patients operated on for acute dissecting aneurysm. A significant worsening of aortic valve insufficiency with time was evident only in patients operated on for acute dissecting aneurysm with an higher incidence in those with progressive root dilatation. CONCLUSIONS: Both the increase of aortic root diameter and the progressive worsening of aortic valve insufficiency seem to justify a more aggressive treatment of the aortic root at the time of surgery for acute aortic dissecting aneurysm but not for chronic atherosclerotic non-dissecting aneurysms.     

Acute aortic dissection versus aortic root aneurysm: comparison of indications for valve sparing aortic root reconstruction.

OBJECTIVES: To prove whether different indications for valve sparing aortic root reconstruction may have an impact on the outcome and longevity of the repair. METHODS: From July 1993 to March 2003, the reimplantation technique for valve sparing aortic root reconstruction was applied to 232 patients. In 44 patients, indication for operation was acute aortic dissection type A (AADA). These patients were compared with 44 randomised patients operated for aortic root aneurysm (root) by matched pair analysis with respect to age, gender, time point of operation and presence of Marfan's syndrome. Peri- and post-operative courses with focus on survival and valvular stability were analysed. RESULTS: Pre-operative grade of aortic insufficiency was 2.4+/-1 in root vs. 1.5+/-1.7 in AADA (P = 0.004) Mean CPB-time (214+/-60 vs. 171+/-42 min;P < 0.001), aortic cross clamp time (158+/-40 vs. 129+/-39 min; P = 0.001) and stay on ICU (5.2+/-9 vs. 1.7+/-1 days; P = 0.034) were longer for AADA, while hospitalisation was comparable (14+/-10 vs. 14+/-7 days; P = 0.88). Five patients (11.4%) from AADA died peri-operatively compared to no patient from root (P = 0.055). None of the early deaths were valve-related. Re-thoracotomy rate was 6.8% for both groups. Mean follow-up was 19+/-21 months for AADA vs. 28+/-21 months for root (P = 0.038) Survival at 3 years was 88+/-5% for AADA and 100% for root (P = 0.028). Freedom from valvular reoperation was 97+/-2.7% for root and 97+/-3% for AADA at 3 years (P = 0.44). At last investigation, mean grade of aortic insufficiency for AADA was 0.2+/-0.3 compared to 0.3+/-0.3 for root (P = 0.34) CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of the underlying indication, the aortic valve preserving reimplantation technique can be performed with favourable functional results.     

Composite aortic root replacement in acute type A dissection: time to rethink the indications?

OBJECTIVE: The indications for aortic root replacement in acute type A dissection are unclear. We reviewed the immediate and long-term outcome of consecutive patients in a series in which a low-threshold policy of composite aortic root replacement had evolved. METHODS: From a prospectively compiled aortic surgery database, we identified 162 patients who had either supracoronary interposition grafting, Group A (n=89), or composite root replacement, Group B (n=73) for acute type A dissection. Patients receiving total arch replacements were excluded. Operative and clinical details were analyzed and patient survival was compared to an age and gender matched census cohort. Need for reoperation on the proximal or distal aorta was also noted. Follow-up totaled 795.5 patient-years. RESULTS: Hospital mortality rates were identical in both groups (12.3%: 11 deaths in group A; 9 in group B). Chronic pulmonary disease, diabetes, malperfusion, hemodynamic compromise and aortic root dilatation were independent risk factors for hospital death. Actuarial survival estimates at 1, 5 and 10 years were 79% (71-88%), 64% (53-75%), and 55% (41-68%) for group A, and 79% (70-86%), 73% (62-83%), and 65% (52-78%) for group B (P=0.48). Age and operative patency of the ascending false lumen were independent risk factors for death after hospital discharge. Proximal aortic reoperation was required for four patients in group A and none in group B (P=0.085). CONCLUSION: A strategy of replacement rather than repair of the dissected aortic root for specific indications in type A dissection yielded high survival and low proximal reoperation rates. These results support an aggressive policy of composite root replacement in acute type A dissection.     

Significance of malperfusion syndromes prior to contemporary surgical repair for acute type A dissection: outcomes and need for additional revascularizations.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the significance of malperfusion syndromes in patients with acute type A aortic dissection following a contemporary surgical management algorithm and the effects on morbidity, hospital mortality, and long-term survival. We believe that obliteration of the primary tear site with restoration of flow in the true aortic lumen results in decreased need for revascularization of malperfused organ systems. METHODS: Our operative approach aims at replacing the entire ascending aorta, resuspension of the aortic valve with repair or replacement of the sinus segment, and routine open replacement of the arch under hypothermic circulatory arrest with retrograde cerebral perfusion with obliteration of false lumen at the distal arch/proximal descending thoracic aorta, thus reestablishing normal flow in the descending thoracic true lumen. From January 1993 to December 2004, 221 consecutive patients underwent repair of acute type A aortic dissection at our institution. Data were collected retrospectively and prospectively. Various types of malperfusion syndromes were present in 26.7% of patients. The organ systems with malperfusion were as follows: cardiac, 7.2%; cerebral, 7.2%; ileofemoral, 12.7%; renal, 4.1%; mesenteric, 1.4%; innominate, 5.4%; and spine, 2.2%. RESULTS: Coronary malperfusion required coronary revascularization in 62.5% of cases. Distal revascularization was needed in 42.9% of patients with ileofemoral malperfusion. Patients with malperfusion were more likely to suffer perioperative myocardial infarction (p<0.001), postoperative coma (p=0.012), delirium (p=0.011), sepsis (p=0.006), acute renal failure (p=0.017), dialysis (p=0.018), and acute limb ischemia (p<0.001). The in-hospital mortality was 30.5% in patients presenting with any malperfusion syndrome while only 6.2% in patients without malperfusion syndrome (p<0.001). Both cardiac (p=0.020) and cerebral malperfusions (p<0.001) were risk factors for in-hospital mortality. The actuarial long-term survival in patients with malperfusion syndrome was estimated by Kaplan-Meier methods to be 67.8%+/-6.1% at 1 year, 54.0%+/-7.0% at 5 years, and 43.1%+/-8.0% at 10 years and for patient without malperfusion 82.7%+/-3.0% at 1 year, 66.3%+/-3.9% at 5 years, and 46.1%+/-6.7% at 10 years (log rank 2.55, p=0.110). Cerebral malperfusion was a significant risk factor for decreased long-term survival (p=0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: The occurrence of malperfusion in patients with acute type A dissection is associated with significant increased risk of in-hospital mortality and complications. Additional revascularization is generally needed in patients with coronary malperfusion and ileofemoral malperfusion. Patients presenting with cardiac and cerebral malperfusions have a high hospital mortality and preoperative cerebral malperfusion is associated with dismal long-term survival.     

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair with stent grafts alone or with a composite device design in patients with acute type B aortic dissection in the setting of malperfusion

ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to compare short-term outcomes in patients who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) with stent grafts alone or with a composite device design (stent graft plus bare-metal aortic stent) for acute type B aortic dissection in the setting of malperfusion.MethodsThis retrospective analysis included patients with acute (≤14 days of symptom onset) complicated type B dissection in the setting of malperfusion who were treated with stent grafts alone (TEVAR cohort) at two European institutions vs those who underwent TEVAR with a composite device design (Cook Medical, Bloomington, Ind) in the investigational STABLE I feasibility study and STABLE II pivotal study (STABLE cohort). Preoperative characteristics and 30-day outcomes (including mortality, malperfusion-related mortality, morbidity, and secondary interventions) were compared between the two groups.ResultsThe TEVAR cohort (41 patients; mean age, 58.8 ± 12.7 years; 78.0% male) and the STABLE cohort (84 patients; mean age, 57.8 ± 11.7 years; 71.4% male) were largely similar in preoperative medical characteristics, with more STABLE patients presenting with a history of hypertension (79.8% vs 58.5%; P = .018). The TEVAR and STABLE groups had similar lengths of dissection (451.8 ± 112.7 mm vs 411.8 ± 116.4 mm; P = .10) and similar proximal and distal extent of dissection. At presentation, the two groups exhibited comparable organ system involvement in malperfusion: renal (53.7% TEVAR, 57.1% STABLE), gastrointestinal (41.5% TEVAR, 44.0% STABLE), lower extremities (34.1% TEVAR, 52.4% STABLE), and spinal cord (9.8% TEVAR, 2.4% STABLE). The 30-day rate of all-cause mortality was 17.1% (7/41) in the TEVAR group and 8.3% (7/84) in the STABLE group (P = .22). The 30-day rate of malperfusion-related mortality (deaths from bowel/mesenteric ischemia or multiple organ failure) was 12% (5/41) in the TEVAR group and 2.4% (2/84) in the STABLE group (P = .038). The 30-day morbidity, for the TEVAR and STABLE groups, respectively, included bowel ischemia (9.8% [4/41] vs 2.4% [2/84]; P = .09), renal failure requiring dialysis (7.3% [3/41] vs 9.5% [8/84]; P > .99), paraplegia or paraparesis (4.9% [2/41] vs 3.6% [3/84]; P = .66), and stroke (2.4% [1/41] vs 10.7% [9/84]; P = .16). The occurrence of 30-day secondary intervention was similar in the TEVAR and STABLE groups (7.3% [3/41] vs 7.1% [6/84]; P > .99). True lumen expansion in the abdominal aorta was significantly greater in the STABLE group.ConclusionsIn patients with acute type B aortic dissection in the setting of branch vessel malperfusion, the use of a composite device with proximal stent grafts and distal bare aortic stent appeared to result in lower malperfusion-related mortality than the use of stent grafts alone. The 30-day rates of morbidity and secondary interventions were similar between the groups.     

Coronary malperfusion due to type A aortic dissection: mechanism and surgical management

BACKGROUND: Coronary malperfusion associated with aortic dissection is relatively rare, but when it occurs, it is fatal to the patient. To salvage such moribund patients, aggressive coronary revascularization concomitant with aortic repair is essential. We review the surgical results and mechanism of malperfusion in a group of 12 patients with coronary malperfusion caused by type A aortic dissection, and we discuss our surgical approach. METHODS: Between March 1990 and March 2003, 12 patients (6.1%) from a total of 196 consecutive patients with acute type A aortic dissection undergoing surgery suffered coronary malperfusion associated with the dissection. There were 4 men and 8 women (mean age, 60.8 +/- 8.3 years). Nine patients had acute myocardial infarction due to dissection before surgery, and 3 patients suffered coronary malperfusion after aortic declamping. RESULTS: Hospital mortality rate was 33.3% (4 patients). The mortality rate was higher than that in patients without coronary malperfusion (33.3% vs. 8.2%, p = 0.019). Three patients could not be weaned from cardiopulmonary bypass, and 1 patient died of heart failure in the intensive care unit. Involved coronary arteries included the right coronary artery (8 patients), left coronary (2 patients), and both (2 patients). Mechanisms of coronary obstruction were compression (2 patients), coronary dissection (7 patients), and coronary disruption (3 patients). Coronary artery bypass grafting was performed concomitant with aortic repair. CONCLUSIONS: Acute type A aortic dissection with coronary involvement is associated with high mortality rate, aggressive coronary revascularization and early aortic repair with simple techniques are necessary to salvage these critically ill patients.     

Total arch replacement with elephant trunk procedure for retrograde dissection

BACKGROUND: The surgical management of type A dissection with the intimal tear in the descending aorta--retrograde dissection--has some challenging aspects because the standard approach through a median sternotomy for ascending aortic dissection is difficult in these cases in which the intimal tear is located in the descending aorta. METHODS: From January 1995 to December 2001, 12 (8.6%) consecutive patients aged 40 to 71 years underwent total arch replacement with an elephant trunk procedure through a median sternotomy for retrograde dissection of the ascending aorta (acute: 10, chronic: 2) among 139 patients with type A dissection. The intimal tear was located in the descending aorta in all patients. Dissection extended proximally to the aortic root in 7 patients and to the ascending aorta in 5, and extended distally to the abdominal aorta in 4 and to the common iliac artery in 8. RESULTS: Hospital mortality occurred in 1 patient (8%) owing to multiple organ failure after malperfusion of the renal arteries. Postoperatively the false lumen in the descending aorta was closed in all patients who survived but the false lumen in the abdominal aorta was patent in 9. The thoracic and abdominal aorta had slight dilatation in 2 patients. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that total arch replacement with an elephant trunk procedure through a median sternomy should be recommended in patients with type A dissection and the intimal tear in the descending aorta. This procedure induces thrombosis of the remaining false lumen in the distal aorta postoperatively.     

Acute type-A dissection of the aorta: which diagnostic modes remain for surgical indication?

The natural course of acute type-A dissection of the aorta (AADA) implies a mortality of 50% within the initial 2 days. Preoperative diagnostic tests have to be expeditious while avoiding hypertension and direct manipulation of the aneurysm to prevent aortic rupture. Since 1979, 51 patients have been operated upon for AADA. The diagnosis was established by one or more of the following methods: transthoracic echocardiography (TTE); transesophageal echocardiography (TEE); conventional angiography (CA); intravenous digital subtraction angiography (DSA); and computed tomography with bolus injection of contrast medium (CT). TTE (n = 26) showed a dissection in 72%, suggested an intimal flap in 25%, and missed the diagnosis in 1 case. CT (n = 15) and DSA (n = 10) failed to indicate dissection in 1 case each. CA (n = 27) demonstrated dissection in every case but was the most time-consuming and stressful method. Since the introduction of combined transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography, no other diagnostic methods have been used. On the basis of this experience, we propose the following diagnostic plan: 1. in AADA, the demonstration of an intimal flap in the ascending aorta by TTE/TEE is an indication for immediate surgery without further diagnostic measures (10 patients: no false-positive findings); 2. if a dissection is suggested by TTE/TEE, then DSA is performed if the supra-aortic branches are suspected to be compromised; CT is preferred if an extrapericardial aortic rupture is suspected; 3. the time-consuming and stressful diagnostic approach of conventional angiography is no longer indicated.     

Impact of organ malperfusion on mortality and morbidity in acute type A aortic dissections

BACKGROUND: Organ malperfusion is a serious complication of acute type A aortic dissection. Management and outcome of malperfusion has been discussed in this study. METHODS: Between November 1994 and May 2003, 118 patients with acute type A aortic dissections were operated. Fifty-seven patients (48.3%) were complicated with organ malperfusion, which is considered as group I. Seventy-three ischemic events were seen in 57 patients with organ malperfusion. Patients in group I were divided into four subgroups according to affected organ system including limb (38 events), coronary (9 events), renal (2 events), visceral (9 events), and cerebral (15 events) ischemia. Sixty-one patients without organ malperfusion constitute group II. RESULTS: The hospital mortality rate was 42.1% (24 of 57) in patients with malperfusion, 14.75% (9 of 61) in group II (p = 0.001), and 27.9% (33 of 118) in all patients. Postoperative complications such as mediastinal hemorrhage, low cardiac output, gastrointestinal system complications, acute renal failure, and multiple organ failure were higher in group I. Mesenteric and limb ischemia associated with high mortality. Multivariate analysis reveals that visceral malperfusion is the strongest predictor of postoperative mortality (odds ratio: 25.09, p = 0.000). Isolated coronary malperfusion had the lowest mortality (one patient, 16.6%) among the patients with organ malperfusion. CONCLUSIONS: Acute type A aortic dissections with organ malperfusion has higher postoperative mortality and morbidity. Immediate aortic repair is our management strategy in patients with limb, coronary, and neurological malperfusion. To reduce the extremely high mortality with mesenteric malperfusion, new strategies should be investigated such as surgical delay with interventional procedures.     

Surgery for type A aortic dissection in patients with cerebral malperfusion: Results from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection

BackgroundThe strategy for intervention remains controversial for patients presenting with type A aortic dissection (TAAAD) and cerebral malperfusion with neurologic deficit.MethodsSurgically managed patients with TAAAD enrolled in the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection were evaluated to determine the incidence and prognosis of patients with cerebral malperfusion.ResultsA total of 2402 patients underwent surgical repair of TAAAD. Of these, 362 (15.1%) presented with cerebral malperfusion (CM) and neurologic deficits, and 2040 (84.9%) patients had no neurologic deficits at presentation. Patients with CM were more less likely to present with chest pain (66% vs 86.5%; P < .001) and back pain (35.9% vs 44.4%; P = .008). Patients with CM were more likely to present with syncope (48.4% vs 10.1%; P < .001), peripheral malperfusion (52.7% vs 38.0%; P < .001), and shock (16.2% vs 4.1%; P < .001). There was no difference in the incidence of Marfan syndrome (2.8% vs 3.0%; P = .870) or history of known aortic aneurysm (11.7% vs 13.9%; P = .296). Patients with CM were more likely to have a DeBakey I (63.8% vs 47.1%; P < .001) and a pericardial effusion (53.8% vs 40.6; P < .001) on presentation. There was no difference in total arch replacement (21.3% for CM vs 19.5% for no CM; P = .473). Patients with CM had an increased incidence of postoperative cerebrovascular accident (17.5% vs 7.2%; P < .001) and acute kidney injury (28.3% vs 18.1%; P < .001). In-hospital mortality was greater in patients with CM (25.7% vs 12.0%; P < .001).ConclusionsFifteen percent of patients with TAAAD presented with CM and neurologic deficits. Despite the fact that this subset of the population was older and more likely to present with peripheral malperfusion, cardiac tamponade, and in shock, in-hospital survival was noted in nearly 75% of the patients. Surgeons may continue to offer lifesaving surgery for TAAAD to this critically ill cohort of patients with acceptable morbidity and mortality.     

Cerebral monitoring with transcranial Doppler ultrasonography improves neurologic outcome during repairs of acute type A aortic dissection

OBJECTIVE: Neurologic complications after repair of acute type A aortic dissection remain significant. The use of power M-mode transcranial Doppler monitoring to verify cerebral blood flow during these repairs might decrease cerebral ischemia by correcting malperfusion. The purpose of this study was to analyze the use of power M-mode transcranial Doppler monitoring during repairs of acute type A dissection with regard to neurologic outcome. METHODS: We performed a prospective study of patients undergoing repairs of acute type A aortic dissection. Repairs included profound hypothermic circulatory arrest and retrograde cerebral perfusion. Patients in whom transcranial Doppler monitoring was used to monitor cerebral blood flow and modify operative technique during repair (study group) were compared with those without monitoring and modification (control group). RESULTS: Between September 2001 and October 2003, we repaired 56 cases of acute type A dissection. Power M-mode transcranial Doppler monitoring was used in 50% (28/56) of cases. Power M-mode transcranial Doppler monitoring altered operative cannulation and guided retrograde cerebral perfusion flow in 28.5% (8/28) and 78.6% (22/28) of cases, respectively. Two patients presented with preoperative stroke, one in each group. One operative death occurred in each group. In-hospital mortality and the occurrence of new stroke were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Temporary neurologic dysfunction occurred less often in the study group (14.8% [4/27] vs 51.8% [14/27], P = .008). CONCLUSIONS: Identification of cerebral malperfusion requires cerebral monitoring. By ensuring cerebral blood flow by using power M-mode transcranial Doppler monitoring and correcting cerebral malperfusion by modifying operative technique, neurologic outcome was improved during repairs of acute type A aortic dissection.     

Surgical approach to ascending aorta in bicuspid aortic valve

OBJECTIVE: Former studies have pointed out that hemodynamic stress imposed by associated valvular disease is the primary factor in the development of ascending aorta dilatation. At present, intrinsic wall pathology is blamed for dilatation and aneurysm formation in bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Aortic valve replacement (AVR) was performed on 78 adult patients with BAV. Patients were divided into two groups. Group I (n = 27) underwent only AVR. Group II (n = 51) underwent AVR and additional ascending aorta procedures such as Shawl-Lapel aortoplasty (n = 12) and tailoring aortoplasty (n = 9). Dacron wrapping was performed after both techniques were done. Ascending aorta replacement was done on 11 patients by using composite graft. Supracoronary graft replacement was performed in 3 patients after AVR. RESULTS: Ascending aorta diameter increment was 1.25 mm/year in normotensive and 2.80 mm/ year in hypertensive patients. Ascending aorta aneurysm (diameter > 55 mm) developed in eight patients in the postoperative period in group I. Ascending aorta dilatation did not develop in group II patients. Mean survival time +/- standard error (SE) was 128 +/- 11 and 99 +/- 4 months and survival possibility was 77.78% and 92.16%. Freedom from reoperation was 65.4% and 95.9% in 8 years in group I and group II, respectively. CONCLUSION: Aortic wrapping with or without aortoplasty has a beneficial effect not only in dilated ascending aorta but also in all nondilated BAV patients with normal-sized aortic diameter. Ascending aorta wrapping in BAV patients preserves the endothelial lining and prevents further dilatation, aneurysm formation, and dissection.     

Late outcomes of strategic arch resection in acute type A aortic dissection

Objective

To compare perioperative and long-term outcomes in patients undergoing hemiarch and aggressive arch replacement for acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD).

Malperfusion of the Thoracoabdominal Vasculature in Aortic Dissection

Ischemic damage to vital organs supplied by the thoracoabdominal aorta greatly increases the overall risk of aortic dissection. Of 320 patients operated upon for aortic dissection since 1985, 33 (10.3%) underwent operations directed at the relief of malperfusion (15/158 acute type A; 9/18 acute type B; 4/78 chronic type A; 5/66 chronic type B). Organs affected were the kidneys in 32; the bowel in 20; and the spinal cord in 1, while critical lower extremity ischemia was present in 11 patients. In total, 64 vascular areas were affected. Fenestration of the dissecting membrane with or without infrarenal grafting was the procedure performed most frequently in 25, followed by replacement of the descending or thoracoabdominal aorta in 6, and bypass grafting or dlrect revascularization of individual side branches in 6. Six other operations targeted at the affected organs were done. Twenty-four patients underwent one-stage operation for malperfusion; in 11, early reoperation after primary aortic repair was necessary, while 2 patients were operated electively. Ten of 33 patients died in hospital, 7 of malperfusion-induced complications. Of three late deaths, one was related to sequelae of malperfusion. We conclude that Immediate diagnosis and prompt relief of malperfusion offer the best prospects for patient survival. Membrane fenestration appears to be the method of choice for treating malperfusion in most patients, and must be directed to the level of aortic and/or side branch obstruction. (J Card Surg 1994;9:748–757)     

Infradiaphragmatic malperfusion of acute aortic dissection associated with previous abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Purpose

To evaluate the association of previous abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) graft replacement with infradiaphragmatic malperfusion in patients with acute aortic dissection.

Methods

Between November 2006 and June 2011, 133 patients were referred to our hospital for management of acute aortic dissection. Eight (6.0 %) of these patients had undergone AAA graft replacement prior to the acute aortic dissection. We compared the computed tomography (CT) images of these 8 patients with those of the remaining 125 patients without previous AAA graft replacement, in terms of organ ischemia as a complication induced by acute aortic dissection.

Results

Infradiaphragmatic malperfusion from acute aortic dissection was confirmed in four of the eight patients who had undergone AAA graft replacement. Contrasted CT scan images indicated that the main cause of infradiaphragmatic malperfusion was collapse of the true lumen from compression by the false lumen into the suprarenal aorta. Although there was no significant difference between the groups in terms of cerebral ischemia and myocardial ischemia, bilateral leg ischemia and visceral ischemia occurred more frequently in the patients who had undergone AAA graft replacement.

Conclusion

Previous AAA graft replacement is a risk factor for infradiaphragmatic malperfusion in patients with acute aortic dissection.