Non-invasive measurement of the regurgitant fraction by pulsed Doppler echocardiography in isolated pure mitral regurgitation.

OBJECTIVE--To assess the usefulness of pulsed Doppler echocardiography as a method of measuring the regurgitant fraction in patients with mitral regurgitation. PATIENTS AND METHODS--Twenty controls and 27 patients with isolated mitral regurgitation underwent Doppler studies. In the patients the study was performed within 48 hours of cardiac catheterisation. Aortic outflow was measured in the centre of the aortic annulus, and mitral inflow was derived from the flow velocity at the tip of the leaflets and the area of the elliptical mitral opening. The regurgitant fraction was calculated as the difference between the two flows divided by the mtiral inflow. RESULTS--In the 20 controls the two flows were almost identical (mitral inflow, 4.44 (SD 0.88) l/min; aortic outflow, 4.58 (SD 0.84) l/min), with a mean regurgitant fraction of 4.2 (SD 8.4)%. In patients with mitral regurgitation, the mitral inflow was significantly higher than the aortic outflow (8.8 (3.6) v 4.3 (1.1) l/min). In most patients the Doppler-derived regurgitant fraction (45.8 (19.2)%) accorded closely with the regurgitant fraction (41.3 (SD 17.8)%) determined by the haemodynamic technique. CONCLUSION--Pulsed Doppler echocardiography, with an instantaneous velocity-valve area method for calculating mitral inflow, reliably measured the severity of regurgitation in patients with mitral regurgitation.     

Non-invasive measurement of the regurgitant fraction by pulsed Doppler echocardiography in isolated pure mitral regurgitation.

OBJECTIVE--To assess the usefulness of pulsed Doppler echocardiography as a method of measuring the regurgitant fraction in patients with mitral regurgitation. PATIENTS AND METHODS--Twenty controls and 27 patients with isolated mitral regurgitation underwent Doppler studies. In the patients the study was performed within 48 hours of cardiac catheterisation. Aortic outflow was measured in the centre of the aortic annulus, and mitral inflow was derived from the flow velocity at the tip of the leaflets and the area of the elliptical mitral opening. The regurgitant fraction was calculated as the difference between the two flows divided by the mtiral inflow. RESULTS--In the 20 controls the two flows were almost identical (mitral inflow, 4.44 (SD 0.88) l/min; aortic outflow, 4.58 (SD 0.84) l/min), with a mean regurgitant fraction of 4.2 (SD 8.4)%. In patients with mitral regurgitation, the mitral inflow was significantly higher than the aortic outflow (8.8 (3.6) v 4.3 (1.1) l/min). In most patients the Doppler-derived regurgitant fraction (45.8 (19.2)%) accorded closely with the regurgitant fraction (41.3 (SD 17.8)%) determined by the haemodynamic technique. CONCLUSION--Pulsed Doppler echocardiography, with an instantaneous velocity-valve area method for calculating mitral inflow, reliably measured the severity of regurgitation in patients with mitral regurgitation.     

Measurement of mitral regurgitation by Doppler echocardiography.

In an attempt to develop a new approach to the non-invasive measurement of mitral regurgitation, Doppler echocardiography and left ventriculography were performed in 20 patients without valvar heart disease (group A) and in 30 patients with pure mitral regurgitation (group B). Volumetric flows through the aortic and the mitral orifices were determined by Doppler echocardiography. Aortic flow (AF) was calculated as the product of the aortic orifice area and the systolic velocity integral. The mitral flow (MF) was calculated as the product of the corrected mitral orifice area and the diastolic velocity integral. The mitral regurgitant fraction (RF) was calculated as RF = 1 - AF/MF. In group A aortic and mitral flow were very similar and the difference between the two did not differ significantly from zero. In group B the mitral flow was significantly larger than the aortic flow. There was a good correlation (r = 0.82) between the regurgitant fraction determined by Doppler echocardiography and the regurgitant grades determined by left ventriculography. The regurgitant fraction increased significantly with each grade of severity. These results show that Doppler echocardiography can be used to give a reliable measure of both aortic and mitral flow. This technique is a new and promising approach to the non-invasive measurement of mitral regurgitation.     

Measurement of mitral regurgitation by Doppler echocardiography

In an attempt to develop a new approach to the non-invasive measurement of mitral regurgitation, Doppler echocardiography and left ventriculography were performed in 20 patients without valvar heart disease (group A) and in 30 patients with pure mitral regurgitation (group B). Volumetric flows through the aortic and the mitral orifices were determined by Doppler echocardiography. Aortic flow (AF) was calculated as the product of the aortic orifice area and the systolic velocity integral. The mitral flow (MF) was calculated as the product of the corrected mitral orifice area and the diastolic velocity integral. The mitral regurgitant fraction (RF) was calculated as RF = 1 - AF/MF. In group A aortic and mitral flow were very similar and the difference between the two did not differ significantly from zero. In group B the mitral flow was significantly larger than the aortic flow. There was a good correlation (r = 0.82) between the regurgitant fraction determined by Doppler echocardiography and the regurgitant grades determined by left ventriculography. The regurgitant fraction increased significantly with each grade of severity. These results show that Doppler echocardiography can be used to give a reliable measure of both aortic and mitral flow. This technique is a new and promising approach to the non-invasive measurement of mitral regurgitation.     

Aortic regurgitation associated with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a colour Doppler echocardiographic study.

The frequency, severity, and cause of aortic regurgitation were assessed by colour Doppler and cross sectional echocardiography in 87 patients (mean SD) age 57 (12) years) with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and 48 age matched controls (57 (8) years). Aortic regurgitant murmurs were recorded in only three of 87 patients and in none of the controls. Colour Doppler echocardiography showed an aortic regurgitant signal in 20 (23%) of the patients and three (6%) of the 48 controls. The colour Doppler signals typical of aortic regurgitation were limited to the left ventricular outflow tract. There were no significant differences between patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with and without aortic regurgitation in terms of age (59 years v 56 years), blood pressure (140/84 mm Hg v 136/80 mm Hg), aortic diameter (34 mm v 33 mm), or frequency of calcification of the aortic valve (15% v 10%) and of systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve with mitral-septal contact (25% v 16%). On cross sectional echocardiograms, the degree of septal protrusion into the left ventricular outflow tract during systole was significantly more prominent (15 v 10 mm), and the portion of the basal septum that protruded most deeply into the left ventricular outflow tract was significantly closer to the aortic annulus in patients with aortic regurgitation than in those without it (11 v 14 mm). Mild aortic regurgitation was found in almost a quarter of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. The regurgitation was related to the morphological abnormality of the left ventricular outflow tract.     

Aortic regurgitation associated with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a colour Doppler echocardiographic study

The frequency, severity, and cause of aortic regurgitation were assessed by colour Doppler and cross sectional echocardiography in 87 patients (mean SD) age 57 (12) years) with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and 48 age matched controls (57 (8) years). Aortic regurgitant murmurs were recorded in only three of 87 patients and in none of the controls. Colour Doppler echocardiography showed an aortic regurgitant signal in 20 (23%) of the patients and three (6%) of the 48 controls. The colour Doppler signals typical of aortic regurgitation were limited to the left ventricular outflow tract. There were no significant differences between patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with and without aortic regurgitation in terms of age (59 years v 56 years), blood pressure (140/84 mm Hg v 136/80 mm Hg), aortic diameter (34 mm v 33 mm), or frequency of calcification of the aortic valve (15% v 10%) and of systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve with mitral-septal contact (25% v 16%). On cross sectional echocardiograms, the degree of septal protrusion into the left ventricular outflow tract during systole was significantly more prominent (15 v 10 mm), and the portion of the basal septum that protruded most deeply into the left ventricular outflow tract was significantly closer to the aortic annulus in patients with aortic regurgitation than in those without it (11 v 14 mm). Mild aortic regurgitation was found in almost a quarter of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. The regurgitation was related to the morphological abnormality of the left ventricular outflow tract.     

A new approach to noninvasive evaluation of aortic regurgitant fraction by two-dimensional Doppler echocardiography

The aortic regurgitant fraction was estimated noninvasively in 20 patients with aortic regurgitation from systolic aortic and pulmonary volume flow determined by duplex Doppler echocardiography. By assuming that an excess of the aortic volume flow (AF) compared with the pulmonary volume flow (PF) is due to aortic regurgitant flow, the aortic regurgitant fraction (RF) was calculated as follows: RF(%) = (AF - PF)/AF X 100. The aortic and pulmonary volume flows were determined as products of systolic integrals of ejection flow velocities and cross-sectional areas of the left and right ventricular outflow tracts, respectively. The Doppler estimate of the regurgitant fraction was compared by semiquantitative grading (1+ to 4+) by cineaortography and with the measurement of regurgitant fraction by catheter technique. The mean Doppler-determined aortic regurgitant fraction was 2.4% for normal subjects, 28.0% for the patients with 1+, 32.6% for the patients with 2+, 53.3% for the patients with 3+, and 62.4% for the patients with 4+. A fair correlation was found between Doppler estimates of regurgitant fraction and semiquantitative cineaortographic grades (r = .80, p less than .01). In the patients without associated mitral regurgitation, a close correlation was observed between Doppler and catheter estimates of regurgitant fraction (r = .96, p less than .01; y = 1.0x - 0.08). In the patients with associated mild mitral regurgitation, however, Doppler estimates of regurgitant fraction substantially underestimated those determined by the conventional catheter technique, which cannot separately quantitate the aortic regurgitant fraction in the presence of mitral regurgitation. These observations indicate that the proposed Doppler technique provides a useful method to evaluate the aortic regurgitant fraction specifically regardless of the presence of associated mitral lesions.     

Effective regurgitant orifice area: A noninvasive Doppler development of an old hemodynamic concept

Objectives. The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility, relation to other methods and significance of the effective regurgitant orifice area measurement.Background. Assessment of the severity of valvular regurgitation (effective regurgitant orifice area) has not been implemented in clinical practice but can be made by Doppler echocardiography.Methods. Effective regurgitant orifice area was calculated by Doppler echocardiography as the ratio of regurgitant volume/ regurgitant jet time-velocity integral and compared with color flow Doppler mapping, angiography, surgical classification, regurgitant fraction and variables of volume overload.Results. In 210 consecutive patients examined prospectively, feasibility improved from the early to the late experience (65% to 95%). Effective regurgitant orifice area was 28 ± 23 mm²(mean ± SD) for aortic regurgitation (32 patients), 22 ± 13 mm²for ischemic/functional mitral regurgitation (50 patients) and 41 ± 32 mm²for organic mitral regurgitation (82 patients). Significant correlations were found between effective regurgitant orifice and mitral jet area by color flow Doppler mapping (r = 0.68 and r = 0.63, p < 0.0001, respectively) and angiographic grade (r = 0.77, p = 0.0004). Effective regurgitant orifice area in surgically determined moderate and severe lesions was markedly different in mitral regurgitation (35 ± 12 and 75 ± 33 mm², respectively, p = 0.009) and in aortic regurgitation (21 ± 8 and 38 ± 5 mm², respectively, p = 0.08). Strong correlations were found between effective regurgitant orifice area and variables reflecting volume overload. A logarithmic regression was found between effective regurgitant orifice area and regurgitant fraction, underlining the complementarity of these indexes.Conclusions. Calculation of effective regurgitant orifice area is a noninvasive Doppler development of an old hemodynamic concept, allowing assessment of the lesion severity of valvular regurgitation. Feasibility is excellent with experience. Effective regurgitant orifice area is an important and clinically significant index of regurgitation severity. It brings additive information to other quantitative indexes and its measurement should be implemented in the comprehensive assessment of valvular regurgitation.     

Quantification of acute aortic regurgitation by color Doppler flow in an experimental animal model

Color Doppler flow studies were performed on ten anesthetized open-chest dogs. Acute aortic regurgitation was created in the dogs by a special valve-spreading catheter. The magnitude of valvular regurgitation was determined by aortic electromagnetic flow recordings of regurgitant fraction. Arbitrarily-designated grades of aortic regurgitation: mild (4%-10%), moderate (11%-30%), and severe ( greater than 30%) were assigned on the basis of electromagnetic flow. We attempted to obtain studies of varying degrees of AR in each animal. Mean regurgitant fraction for the three grades were 6.8 +/- 0.6% (n = 11), 22.0 +/- 2.4% (n = 7), and 40.4 +/- 2.5 (n = 20), respectively (each P less than 0.05). By color Doppler flow assessment, the ratio of regurgitant jet height to the left ventricular dimension at the junction of the left ventricular outflow tract and the aortic annulus (JH/LVOH) was measured in each study. AR was classified by Doppler as grade I (mild), 1%-24%; II (moderate), 25%-64%; and III (severe), greater than or equal to 65% jet height/left ventricular outflow tract height. Color Doppler flow correlated well with flowmeter assessment of regurgitant fraction. Color Doppler flow tests had a calculated sensitivity of 88%, specificity of 83%, and predictive value of 85% for significant (moderate + severe) aortic regurgitation. Our data support the concept that this method of color Doppler flow assessment provides a quantitative noninvasive evaluation of aortic regurgitation.     

Pulsed echo-Doppler evaluation of regurgitant fraction in mitral valve insufficiency

The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity of Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of the regurgitant fraction in pure mitral insufficiency. The Doppler echocardiographic measurement of systemic flow was made at the level of the aortic ring, and the mitral flow by the method of integration of instantaneous flow proposed by Touche. In a preliminary study, we demonstrated a close correlation between forward aortic and mitral flow in 20 normal subjects (r = 0.94; SD = 0.31 l/mn; y = 0.98 x -0.004). We then studied a group of 38 patients with pure isolated mitral regurgitation. Five patients were excluded because of the poor quality of the echocardiographic documents. The hemodynamic regurgitant fraction was determined by measuring pulmonary flow by thermodilution and the left ventricular outflow by digitised angiography. The average Doppler and hemodynamic regurgitant fractions were 46.6 +/- 18% and 42 +/- 17% respectively. There was a close correlation between the Doppler and hemodynamic values (r = 0.91; SD = 7.8%; y = 0.97 x + 5.7). The correlations were also good between Doppler regurgitant fraction and the four angiographic grades of regurgitation (r = 0.88). A statistically significant difference was observed between the Doppler regurgitant fractions of Grades I and II and of Grades III and IV (p less than 0.001). In addition, the ratio of mitral VTI/aortic VTI gave a useful index of regurgitation in pure mitral insufficiency. When the ratio was greater than 1.3 the regurgitant fraction was over 40% with a sensitivity of 79% and a specificity of 86%. Finally, this study shows that pure, isolated mitral regurgitation can be evaluated by Doppler echocardiography.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Quantitation of mitral regurgitation by Doppler echocardiography

The evaluation and care of patients with mitral regurgitation would be facilitated by an easy, reproducible and noninvasive method that could quantitate the hemodynamic burden. In this study, we describe a new Doppler echocardiographic method that measures the regurgitant fraction and we compare it with angiographic and scintigraphic methods. A total of 27 patients with mitral regurgitation were evaluated by echocardiography and either cardiac catheterization or scintigraphy. With two-dimensional echocardiography, diastolic and systolic volumes were measured to derive the left ventricular stroke volume (LVSV). The forward stroke volume (FSV) was obtained from the product of M mode-derived aortic valve area and ascending aortic flow velocity integral assessed by continuous-wave Doppler. Regurgitant fraction was calculated as follows: (LVSV - FSV)/LVSV. Comparisons showed that regurgitant fraction calculated by Doppler echocardiography correlated with regurgitant fraction determined by both cardiac catheterization (r = .82) and by scintigraphy (r = .89). There was, however, an important interobserver variability within each method: 10%, 13%, and 11% for Doppler echocardiography, angiography, and scintigraphy, respectively. In conclusion, Doppler echocardiography can be used to quantitate mitral regurgitation. Serial noninvasive determinations of regurgitant fraction may be useful in the evaluation of therapy and in the follow-up of patients with mitral insufficiency.     

Quantification of aortic regurgitation with amplitude-weighted mean flow velocity from continuous wave Doppler spectra

Aortic regurgitant fraction (RFao) was quantified by estimating the ratio of the forward blood flow through the aortic (Qao) and pulmonary (Qp) valve: RFao = 100(Qao - Qp)/Qao. Aortic and pulmonary flow were measured by the systolic time integrals of the amplitude-weighted mean velocity from continuous wave Doppler spectra recorded over the aortic and pulmonary valves. Thus, measurements are independent of the left and right ventricular outflow tract area. In 20 normal subjects, aortic regurgitant fraction ranged between -2.9% and +12.0% (mean +4.3%), the physiologic value being +2%. In 20 patients with pure aortic regurgitation, aortic regurgitant fraction obtained by Doppler spectra (y) was compared with that calculated from biplane left ventriculography and cardiac output determined with the Fick method (x). The correlation was r = 0.94, (SEE = 5.4%, which is 10.6% of the angiography-Fick mean value). The regression line was y = 0.87x + 6.6 (mean y = 51.2%, mean x = 51.1%). It is concluded that determination of aortic regurgitant fraction in pure aortic regurgitation by using the amplitude-weighted mean velocity from continuous wave Doppler spectra is accurate and allows easy noninvasive evaluation of the regurgitant fraction in routine clinical applications.     

Aortic valve prolapse with aortic regurgitation assessed by Doppler color-flow echocardiography.

The incidence of and the Doppler color-flow echocardiographic characteristics of aortic valve prolapse with nonrheumatic aortic regurgitation were examined. Aortic valve prolapse was observed in 21 of 243 patients (15 men and 6 women) with aortic regurgitation as detected by Doppler color-flow echocardiography (rheumatic, 112; nonrheumatic, 131) in 1247 consecutive patients. Patients with aortic valve prolapse included three patients with essential hypertension and one with annuloaortic ectasia. The remaining 17 patients (7% of those with aortic regurgitation) had no other associated cardiovascular disease (idiopathic aortic valve prolapse). Prolapse of the mitral or the tricuspid valve or both was associated with aortic valve prolapse in seven patients. Aortic regurgitation jet was markedly deviated from the axis of left ventricular outflow tract toward the anterior mitral leaflet or the interventricular septum in 17 of 21 (81%) patients with aortic valve prolapse, whereas 28 of 110 (25%) patients with nonrheumatic aortic regurgitation without prolapse and 17 of 112 (15%) patients with rheumatic aortic regurgitation without prolapse showed the deviation of regurgitant jet (p < 0.001). In conclusion, idiopathic aortic valve prolapse is one of the significant causes of aortic regurgitation, and a marked deviation of regurgitant jet is a characteristic Doppler color-flow echocardiographic finding of aortic regurgitation that results from aortic valve prolapse.     

Cross-sectional visualization of regurgitant jet by color flow mapping to evaluate aortic regurgitation

In the noninvasive evaluation of aortic regurgitation by Doppler echocardiography, flow mapping of the aortic regurgitant jet using the long-axis approach is of limited value in cases of combined mitral stenotic lesions. This is because the transmitral flow yields flow disturbances in the left ventricle, making it difficult to identify the extent of the aortic regurgitant jet. To overcome these limitations, the severity of aortic regurgitation was evaluated using the cross-sectional area of the aortic regurgitant jet at the level of the aortic valve as visualized by color flow imaging technique. The study population consisted of 16 patients with aortic regurgitation (10 with pure aortic regurgitation, five with superimposed mitral stenosis, and one with mitral valve replacement). Three normal subjects served as controls. The cross-section of the aortic regurgitant jet was visualized as a mosaic of yellow and blue in all patients with aortic regurgitation, but not in any of the controls. Planimetric measurements of the cross-sectional area of the regurgitant jet (J) and the aortic annulus area (Ao) were performed, and the Doppler parameter, J/Ao, was calculated. As a reference, the aortic regurgitant fraction (RF) was calculated from Doppler measurements of systolic aortic and pulmonary flows (AF and PF); RF (%) = (AF - RF)/AF x 100. The Doppler parameter, J/Ao, correlated well with the Doppler measurement of RF (r = 0.82, p less than 0.005), irrespective of the presence of associated mitral lesions. Thus, the cross-sectional area of the aortic regurgitant jet determined by color flow imaging technique would be a useful estimate of the severity of aortic regurgitation, even in the presence of associated mitral stenotic changes.     

Detection of mild aortic regurgitation by range-gated pulsed doppler echocardiography

In order to assess the sensitivity and specificity of the range-gated pulsed Doppler echocardiogram for the detection of aortic regurgitation, a study with use of this technique was carried out in 46 patients. They were classified into 3 groups: Group I was composed of 19 patients with a variety of heart diseases but with a competent aortic valve. Cardiac catheterization revealed no aortic regurgitation in any of the 19 patients, and the Doppler echocardiogram detected no turbulent diastolic flow in the left ventricular outflow tract. Group II was composed of 17 patients who clinically and by auscultation had aortic regurgitation, which was confirmed by cardiac catheterization in 6. In all 17 patients the Doppler echocardiogram detected several grades of turbulent diastolic flow compatible with aortic regurgitation in the left ventricular outflow tract. Group III was composed of 10 patients with aortic regurgitation but without the expected clinical or auscultatory evidence. The echocardiogram detected mitral valve flutter in only 1 patient. Cardiac catheterization revealed aortic regurgitation graded $\text{1}\text{4}$ and $\text{2}\text{4}$ in 9 patients, and the patient who did not undergo catheterization had a murmur of aortic insufficiency 6 months later. In all 10 patients the Doppler echocardiogram detected a regurgitating turbulent flow compatible with aortic regurgitation in the left ventricular outflow tract.It is concluded that the Doppler echocardiogram was more useful than auscultation and echocardiography for the detection of mild aortic regurgitation. In this study the range-gated pulsed Doppler echocardiogram proved 100% sensitive and specific. However, it will be necessary to study larger groups in order to assess its utility in more complicated conditions (obesity, emphysema, and heart failure) and the differential diagnosis with other diastolic murmurs.     

Determination of regurgitant fraction in isolated mitral or aortic regurgitation by pulsed Doppler two-dimensional echocardiography

Measurements of mitral and aortic valve flows were obtained with two-dimensional Doppler echocardiography in 25 patients with isolated mitral (n = 19) or aortic (n = 6) regurgitation and regurgitant fraction was calculated as the difference between the two flows divided by the flow through the regurgitant valve. Results were compared with measurements of regurgitant fraction determined by combined left ventricular angiography and thermodilution. Regurgitant fraction averaged 56 +/- 18% (range 19 to 79) by Doppler echocardiography and 48 +/- 17% (range 13 to 72) by angiography. A significant correlation was observed between the two methods (r = 0.91; SEE = 7%). In contrast, no significant correlation was found between regurgitant fraction measured by either method and the angiographic 1+ to 4+ qualitative classification of regurgitation. Doppler echocardiography appears to be an accurate method for the non-invasive quantification of severity of regurgitation in isolated left-sided valve lesions.     

Noninvasive quantification of mitral regurgitation in dilated cardiomyopathy: correlation of two Doppler echocardiographic methods

The presence and severity of functional mitral regurgitation were quantified by Doppler echocardiography in 17 patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and no evidence of primary valvular disease. Mitral regurgitant fraction was greater than 20% in 11 of the 17 patients, and exceeded 40% in four patients. Total stroke volume, calculated from the difference between end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes obtained by two-dimensional echocardiography, correlated well with mitral valve inflow determined by Doppler echocardiography (r = 0.90, p less than 0.001). Similarly, mitral regurgitant volume, calculated as the difference between echocardiographic total stroke volume and forward aortic volume obtained by Doppler echocardiography, correlated well with regurgitant volume calculated as the difference between mitral valve inflow and forward aortic flow, both determined by Doppler echocardiography (r = 0.90, p less than 0.001). Accordingly, functional mitral regurgitation can be conveniently demonstrated in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy by two different Doppler echocardiography methods, whose results are closely correlated. Mitral regurgitant fraction is greater than 20% in two thirds of the patients with a dilated cardiomyopathy.     

Doppler echocardiography measurement of the regurgitation fraction in patients with aortic valve insufficiency

The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical utility of pulsed Doppler echocardiography in the determination of regurgitant fraction in patients with aortic regurgitation. Therefore, in 33 unselected consecutive patients with aortic regurgitation, and in 16 patients without heart disease Doppler echocardiography was performed to measure blood flow at the aortic and pulmonary valve. The regurgitant blood flow (RBV) was calculated as the difference of the stroke volumes measured at the aortic and pulmonary valve. The regurgitant fraction (RF) was computed as RBV/aortic flow. At cardiac catheterization RBV and RF were calculated from the left ventricular angiographic stroke volume and the stroke volume measured by thermodilution technique. Four patients were excluded because of technically poor left-ventricular angiograms. In eight patients with aortic regurgitation Doppler measurement of RBV and RF was impossible. The correlations between the invasive and the Doppler data were significant in 21 patients with aortic regurgitation (RBV: r = 0.87, SEE = 16.1 ml; RF: r = 0.90, SEE = 8.1%). However, the RF (41.6 +/- 17.6%) was overestimated by Doppler echocardiography (46.0 +/- 17.9%; p les than 0.021). In the control group RBV ranged between -8.1 ml and 10.5 ml and RF between -13.3% and 7.4%. Thus, pulsed Doppler echocardiography is clinically useful in determination of the regurgitant fraction in about 70% of patients with pure aortic regurgitation. The Doppler method, however, is limited in the diagnosis and quantification of mild aortic regurgitation.     

Doppler evaluation of severity of mitral regurgitation: Relation to pulmonary venous blood flow patterns in an animal study

Objectives. This study examined the influence of regurgitant volume on pulmonary venous blood flow patterns in an animal model with quantifiable mitral regurgitation.Background. Systolic pulmonary venous blood flow is influenced by atrial filling and compliance and ventricular output and by the presence of mitral regurgitation. The quantitative severity of the regurgitant volume itself is difficult to judge in clinical examinations.Methods. Six sheep with chronic mitral regurgitation produced by previous operation to create chordal damage were examined. At reoperation the heart was exposed and epicardial echocardiography performed. Pulmonary venous blood flow waveforms were recorded by pulsed Doppler under color flow Doppler guidance using a Vingmed 750 scanner. The pulmonary venous systolic inflow to the left atrium was expressed as a fraction of the total inflow velocity time integral. Flows across the aortic and mitral valves were recorded by electromagnetic flowmeters balanced against each other. Pressures in the left ventricle and left atrium were measured directly with high fidelity manometer-tipped catheters. Preload and afterload were systematically manipulated, resulting in 24 stable hemodynamic states.Results. Simple logarithmic correlation between the regurgitant volume and size of a positive or negative pulmonary venous inflow velocity time integral during systole was good (r = −0.841). By stepwise linear regression analysis with pulmonary venous negative systolic velocity time integral as a dependent variable compared with the regurgitant volume, fractional shortening, left atrial νwave size, systemic vascular resistance and left ventricular systolic pressure, only contributions from νwave size and regurgitant volume (r = 0.80) reached statistical significance in determining pulmonary venous negative systolic flow.Conclusions. Evaluation of systolic pulmonary venous blood flow velocity time integral can give valuable information helpful for estimating the regurgitant volume secondary to mitral regurgitation.     

Quantification of aortic regurgitation utilizing continuous wave Doppler ultrasound

Aortic regurgitation and mitral stenosis are hemodynamically similar, insofar as both result in passive ventricular filling across a narrow orifice driven by a declining pressure gradient. Because mitral stenosis is successfully characterized by Doppler ultrasound determination of the velocity half-time, or time constant, aortic regurgitation might be quantified in an analogous fashion. Eighty-six patients with diverse causes of aortic regurgitation underwent continuous wave Doppler examination before cardiac catheterization or urgent aortic valve replacement. The Doppler velocity half-time was defined as the time required for the diastolic aortic regurgitation velocity profile to decay by 29%, whereas catheterization pressure half-time was calculated as the time required for transvalvular pressure to decay by 50%. Doppler velocity and catheterization pressure half-times were linearly related (r = 0.91). Doppler velocity half-times were inversely related to regurgitant fraction (r = -0.88). Angiographic severity (1+ = mild to 4+ = severe) was also inversely related to pressure and velocity half-time; a Doppler half-time threshold of 400 ms separated mild (1+, 2+) from significant (3+, 4+) aortic regurgitation with high specificity (0.92) and predictive value (0.90). The Doppler velocity half-time was independent of pulse pressure, mean arterial pressure, ejection fraction and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure. Estimation of transvalvular aortic pressure half-time utilizing continuous wave Doppler ultrasound is a reliable and accurate method for the noninvasive evaluation of the severity of aortic regurgitation.