Quantitative, competitive PCR assay for HIV-1 using a microplate-based detection system

OBJECTIVE: Amylin, a secretory peptide of beta-cells, is the constituent peptide of islet amyloid, which is characteristic of NIDDM, and changes in amylin secretion in response to therapies may influence the rate of production of islet amyloid. The primary objective of this study was to determine whether therapy with sulfonylurea or basal insulin in NIDDM would alter amylin secretion in a way that might affect the formation of islet amyloid. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In a randomized crossover design, eight subjects with NIDDM underwent three 8-week periods of therapy with diet alone, sulfonylurea, or exogenous basal insulin, with evaluation of amylin, amylin-like peptide (ALP), and glucose and C-peptide concentrations, both during fasting and after a standard breakfast. Changes in beta-cell function (% beta) were assessed, in the basal state by homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) and in the stimulated state by hyperglycemic clamps. Seven nondiabetic control subjects each underwent a meal profile and hyperglycemic clamp. RESULTS: Both sulfonylurea and insulin therapy reduced basal glucose concentrations compared with diet alone, but neither reduced the increased postprandial glucose increments. Both sulfonylurea and insulin therapy increased basal % beta, assessed by HOMA, but only sulfonylurea increased the second-phase C-peptide responses to the hyperglycemic clamp. Sulfonylurea increased time-averaged mean postprandial amylin and ALP concentrations compared with diet alone (geometric mean [1-SD range] for amylin, 4.9 [2.0-11.8] vs. 3.0 [1.4-6.2] pmol/l, P = 0.003; for ALP, 16.4 [8.5-31.7] vs. 10.1 [4.9-20.8] pmol/l, P = 0.001). Insulin therapy reduced basal ALP concentrations compared with diet alone (2.9 [1.5-5.6] vs. 6.0 [2.6-13.6] pmol/l, P = 0.03), but had no effect on postprandial concentrations of amylin (3.0 [1.3-6.5] pmol/l) or ALP (10.0 [5.5-18.1] pmol/l). CONCLUSIONS: By increasing postprandial concentrations of the constituent peptides of islet amyloid, sulfonylurea therapy might increase the rate of deposition of islet amyloid and thereby accelerate the decline of % beta in NIDDM, compared with diet therapy alone.     

Effect of obesity on the response to insulin therapy in noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

An initial improvement in glycemic control is often followed by gradual deterioration of glycemia during insulin treatment of patients with noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). We examined the causes of such worsening in a 12-month follow-up analysis of 100 insulin-treated NIDDM patients in the Finnish Multicenter Insulin Therapy Study who were treated with either combination therapy with insulin or insulin alone. In the entire study group, glycemic control averaged 9.7 +/- 0.2% at 0 months and 8.0 +/- 0.1%, 8.0 +/- 0.1%, 8.2 +/- 0.1%, and 8.5 +/- 0.2% at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months (P < 0.001 for each time point vs. 0 months). Glycemic control at 12 months was significantly worse than that at 3 (P < 0.001), 6 (P < 0.001), and 9 months (P < 0.02). Baseline body mass index was the most significant predictor of deterioration in glycemic control. During 1 yr, hemoglobin A1c decreased almost 3-fold more (by 1.7 +/- 0.2%; P < 0.001 vs. 0 months) in patients whose baseline weight was below the mean baseline body mass index of 28.1 kg/m2 (nonobese patients) than in those whose weight exceeded 28.1 kg/m2 (obese patients; 0.5 +/- 0.2%; P = NS vs. 0 months; P < 0.01 vs. obese patients). Glycemic control improved similarly over 1 yr in the nonobese subjects and deteriorated similarly in the obese patients regardless of their treatment regimen. Insulin doses, per body weight, were similar in the nonobese and obese patients. The nonobese patients consistently gained less weight during 12 months of combination therapy with insulin (3.5 +/- 0.6 kg at 12 months) than during insulin therapy alone (5.1 +/- 0.6 kg; P < 0.05). The treatment regimen did not influence weight gain in the obese group, who gained 4.4 +/- 1.0 kg during combination therapy with insulin and 4.5 +/- 1.1 kg during insulin therapy alone. We reached the following conclusions: 1) after an initial good response, glycemic control deteriorates more in obese than in nonobese patients with NIDDM; 2) in obese patients, weight gain per se cannot explain the poor glycemic response to combination or insulin therapy, but it may induce a disproportionately large increase in insulin requirements because of greater insulin resistance in the obese than in the nonobese; 3) in nonobese patients, glycemic control improves equally during 1 yr with combination therapy with insulin and insulin alone, but combination therapy with insulin is associated with less weight gain than treatment with insulin alone; 4) weight gain appears harmful, as it is associated with increases in blood pressure and low density lipoprotein cholesterol.     

Role of exercise training in the prevention and treatment of insulin resistance and non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

Recent epidemiological studies indicate that individuals who maintain a physically active lifestyle are much less likely to develop impaired glucose tolerance and non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). Moreover, it was found that the protective effect of physical activity was strongest for individuals at highest risk of developing NIDDM. Reducing the risk of insulin resistance and NIDDM by regularly performed exercise is also supported by several aging studies. It has been found that older individuals who vigorously train on a regular basis exhibit a greater glucose tolerance and a lower insulin response to a glucose challenge than sedentary individuals of similar age and weight. While the evidence is substantial that aerobic exercise training can reduce the risk of impaired glucose tolerance and NIDDM, the evidence that exercise training is beneficial in the treatment of NIDDM is not particularly strong. Many of the early studies investigating the effects of exercise training on NIDDM could not demonstrate improvements in fasting plasma glucose and insulin levels, or glucose tolerance. The adequacy of the training programmes in many of these studies, however, is questionable. More recent studies using prolonged, vigorous exercise-training protocols have produced more favourable results. There are several important adaptations to exercise training that may be beneficial in the prevention and treatment of insulin resistance, impaired glucose tolerance and NIDDM. An increase in abdominal fat accumulation and loss of muscle mass are highly associated with the development of insulin resistance. Exercise training results in preferential loss of fat from the central regions of the body and should therefore contribute significantly in preventing or alleviating insulin resistance due to its development. Likewise, exercise training can prevent muscle atrophy and stimulate muscle development. Several months of weight training has been found to significantly lower the insulin response to a glucose challenge without affecting glucose tolerance, and to increase the rate of glucose clearance during a euglycaemic clamp. Muscle glucose uptake is equal to the product of the arteriovenous glucose difference and the rate of glucose delivery or muscle blood flow. While it has been known for many years that insulin will accelerate blood glucose extraction by insulin-sensitive peripheral tissues, recent evidence suggests that it can also acutely vasodilate skeletal muscle and increase muscle blood flow in a dose-dependent manner. A reduced ability of insulin to stimulate muscle blood flow is a characteristic of insulin-resistant obese individuals and individuals with NIDDM. Exercise training, however, has been found to help alleviate this problem, and substantially improve the control of insulin over blood glucose. Improvements in insulin resistance and glucose tolerance with exercise training are highly related to an increased skeletal muscle insulin action. This increased insulin action is associated with an increase in the insulin-regulatable glucose transporters, GLUT4, and enzymes responsible for the phosphorylation, storage and oxidation of glucose. Changes in muscle morphology may also be important following training. With exercise training there is an increase in the conversion of fast twitch glycolytic IIb fibres to fast twitch oxidative IIa fibres, as well as an increase in capillary density. IIa fibres have a greater capillary density and are more insulin-sensitive and -responsive than IIb fibres. Evidence has been provided that morphological changes in muscle, particularly the capillary density of the muscle, are associated with changes in fasting insulin levels and glucose tolerance. Furthermore, significant correlations between glucose clearance, muscle capillary density and fibre type have been found in humans during a euglycaemic clamp. Exercise training may also improve control over hepatic glucose production by increasin     

Clozapine reduces rehospitalization among schizophrenia patients

Diabetes mellitus positive for antibodies to glutamate decarboxylase is heterogeneous as far as the degree of impairment of endogenous insulin release, though antibodies to glutamate decarboxylase are the most useful marker for future insulin deficiency. To investigate what determines the prognosis of diabetes mellitus positive for antibodies to glutamate decarboxylase, we measured HLA-DRB1 alleles in three groups: 77 cases of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM), 44 of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) with secondary failure of oral hypoglycemic therapy, and 22 of NIDDM well controlled by diet and/or sulfonylurea agents. The proportion of susceptible and resistant alleles to IDDM determined the degree of insulin deficiency, and comparison of IDDM to NIDDM well controlled by diet and/or sulfonylurea agents revealed significant differences in DRB1*0405 (P < 0.05; RR = 2.82 and RR = 0.89, respectively) and DRB1*1502 (P < 0.001; RR = 0.02 and RR = 2.19, respectively). This study revealed that HLA-DRB1 alleles contribute to determining the prognosis of Japanese diabetes mellitus positive for antibodies to glutamate decarboxylase.     

Chronic chlorpropamide therapy of noninsulin-dependent diabetes augments basal and stimulated insulin secretion by increasing islet sensitivity to glucose

To determine the effect of chronic sulfonylurea therapy on islet function in noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM), studies were performed in 18 untreated NIDDM patients before and after 12-16 weeks of chlorpropamide therapy. Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) fell with chlorpropamide therapy from 249 +/- 16 to 157 +/- 8 mg/dl (mean +/- SEM; P less than 0.001), and basal insulin increased from 17 +/- 2 to 24 +/- 3 microU/ml (P less than 0.001). The percent change in basal insulin correlated with the pretreatment FPG (r = 0.62; P less than 0.01) and inversely with the change in FPG during chlorpropamide (r = -0.57; P less than 0.025). Thus, patients with the highest pretreatment FPG showed the largest relative increase in basal insulin and the largest fall of FPG with chlorpropamide therapy. In nine patients, arginine-stimulated acute insulin responses (AIR) were studied at each of three plasma glucose (PG) levels both before and during chlorpropamide treatment. AIR at FPG was not different before and during treatment. However, when PG during treatment was matched by glucose infusion to the pretreatment FPG, the AIR was clearly increased during chlorpropamide therapy (176 +/- 65 vs. 49 +/- 11 microU/ml; P less than 0.02). When AIR is plotted against PG for each individual, the slope of the regression line generated (slope of glucose potentiation) is a measure of that patient's islet sensitivity to glucose. The logarithm of the slope of glucose potentiation correlated inversely with FPG (r = -0.92; P less than 0.001). Chlorpropamide treatment increased the slopes of potentiation from 0.26 +/- 0.11 to 1.47 +/- 0.70 (P less than 0.01). We conclude that chronic chlorpropamide therapy augments both basal and stimulated insulin secretion in NIDDM and that this may be an important mechanism of the drug's hypoglycemic effect. The data support the hypothesis that the hyperglycemia of NIDDM is related to islet insensitivity to glucose and that chlorpropamide treatment improves this impairment.     

A risk-benefit appraisal of acarbose in the management of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

Acarbose is an alpha-glucosidase inhibitor proposed for the treatment of diabetic patients. It acts by competitively inhibiting the alpha-glucosidases in the intestinal brush border. The principal action of these enzymes is to convert nonabsorbable dietary starch and sucrose into absorbable monosaccharides (e.g. glucose). Enzyme inhibitors delay this conversion, slowing the formation and consequently the absorption of monosaccharides, and thus reducing the concentration of postprandial blood glucose. Both starch and sucrose are influenced, whereas lactose and glucose are not. Many studies in experimental animals, healthy volunteers and patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) have shown that acarbose decreases postprandial blood glucose, with a lesser reduction of fasting blood glucose, plasma triglycerides and postprandial insulin levels. In long term studies in NIDDM patients, acarbose significantly reduced glycosylated haemoglobin levels. Acarbose is only minimally absorbed from the gut and no systemic adverse effects have been demonstrated after long term administration. The drug allows undigested carbohydrates to pass into the large bowel where they are fermented causing flatulence, bloating and diarrhoea. These symptoms, which occur in approximately 30 to 60% of patients, tend to decrease with time and seem to be dose-dependent. They are minimised by starting therapy with low doses (such as 50mg 3 times daily) which may be effective in many patients. An increase in serum hepatic transaminases observed in earlier studies in the US, where doses of acarbose up to 900mg daily were used, has been not reported with the lower doses of the drug actually recommended [150 to 300mg (up to 600mg) daily]. In conclusion, acarbose may be useful in patients with NIDDM when diet alone is no longer able to maintain satisfactory blood glucose control. Furthermore, it may be a valid alternative to sulphonylurea or biguanide therapy when these drugs are contraindicated and insulin administration may be delayed. Acarbose seems also to be a useful adjunct to hypoglycaemic oral agents but its precise role in this field has not been fully clarified.     

The efficacy and safety of miglitol therapy compared with glibenclamide in patients with NIDDM inadequately controlled by diet alone

OBJECTIVE: To compare the therapeutic effects of the alpha-glucosidase inhibitor miglitol (BAY m 1099), the sulfonylurea glibenclamide, and placebo on parameters of metabolic control and safety in patients with NIDDM that is inadequately controlled by diet alone. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: After a 4-week placebo run-in period, 201 patients in 18 centers in 4 countries were randomized in a double-blind manner to miglitol (50 mg t.i.d., followed by 100 mg t.i.d.), glibenclamide (3.5 mg q.d/b.i.d.), or placebo for 24 weeks. Efficacy criteria were changes from baseline of HbA1c, fasting and postprandial blood glucose and insulin levels, body weight, and serum triglycerides. RESULTS: Efficacy was assessed in 119 patients who completed the full protocol, and the results were similar to those obtained in 186 patients who fulfilled the validity criteria for analysis. Compared with placebo, mean baseline-adjusted HbA1c decreased by 0.75% (P = 0.0021) and 1.01% (P = 0.0001) in the miglitol and glibenclamide treatment groups, respectively. Blood glucose decreased slightly in the fasting state and considerably in the postprandial state in both treatment groups but not in the placebo group. Fasting insulin levels increased slightly (NS) in all treatment groups; however, postprandial insulin levels decreased with miglitol, while increasing markedly with glibenclamide (P = 0.0001 between all treatment groups). Gastrointestinal side effects (flatulence and diarrhea) occurred mostly in the miglitol-treated patients, while some glibenclamide-treated patients had symptoms suggestive of hypoglycemia. CONCLUSIONS: Miglitol monotherapy is effective and safe in NIDDM patients. Compared with glibenclamide, it reduced HbA1c less effectively and caused more gastrointestinal side effects. On the other hand, glibenclamide, unlike miglitol, tended to cause hypoglycemia, hyperinsulinemia, and weight gain, which are not desirable in patients with NIDDM.     

Acarbose in NIDDM patients with poor control on conventional oral agents. A 24-week placebo-controlled study

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of acarbose, compared with placebo, on the metabolic control of NIDDM patients inadequately controlled on maximal doses of conventional oral agents. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In this three-center double-blind study, 90 Chinese NIDDM patients with persistent poor glycemic control despite maximal doses of sulfonylurea and metformin were randomly assigned to receive additional treatment with acarbose 100 mg thrice daily or placebo for 24 weeks, after 6 weeks of dietary reinforcement. Efficacy was assessed by changes in HbA1c, fasting and 1-h postprandial plasma glucose and insulin levels, and fasting lipid levels. RESULTS: Acarbose treatment was associated with significantly greater reductions in HbA1c (-0.5 +/- 0.2% vs. placebo 0.1 +/- 0.2% [means +/- SEM], P = 0.038), 1-h postprandial glucose (-2.3 +/- 0.4 mmol/l vs. placebo 0.7 +/- 0.4 mmol/l, P < 0.001) and body weight (-0.54 +/- 0.32 kg vs. placebo 0.42 +/- 0.29 kg, P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding changes in fasting plasma glucose and lipids or fasting and postprandial insulin levels. Flatulence was the most common side effect (acarbose vs. placebo: 28/45 vs. 11/44, P < 0.05). One patient on acarbose had asymptomatic elevations in serum transaminases that normalized in 4 weeks after acarbose withdrawal. Another patient on acarbose developed severe hypoglycemia; glycemic control was subsequently maintained on half the baseline dosage of sulfonylurea. CONCLUSIONS: In NIDDM patients inadequately controlled on conventional oral agents, acarbose in moderate doses resulted in beneficial effects on glycemic control, especially postprandial glycemia, and mean body weight. Additional use of acarbose can be considered as a useful alternative in such patients if they are reluctant to accept insulin therapy.     

Chlorpropamide-induced hypoglycemia: successful treatment with diazoxide

A healthy adolescent boy was treated on two occasions for an overdose of chlorpropamide (Diabinese). Glucose therapy alone was not sufficient to control the hypoglycemia, but the administration of glucose plus diazoxide raised the blood sugar to supranormal levels. A bolus of intravenous glucagon briefly raised the blood sugar level to within normal limits, increased the blood ketones but also augmented insulin secretion. An overdose of sulfonylurea may cause prolonged and fatal hypoglycemia. Rational therapy, both in diabetic and normal persons, is glucose plus an "insulin antagonist." The administration of diazoxide was effective in our patient, substantially reducing the plasma insulin level; this agent may be the "insulin-antagonist" of choice for use in sulfonylurea-induced hypoglycemia.     

Short-term oestrogen replacement therapy improves insulin resistance, lipids and fibrinolysis in postmenopausal women with NIDDM

Oestrogen replacement therapy is associated with a decreased risk of cardiovascular disease in postmenopausal women. Patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) have an increased cardiovascular risk. However, oestrogen replacement therapy is only reluctantly prescribed for patients with NIDDM. In a double blind randomized placebo controlled trial we assessed the effect of oral 17 beta-estradiol during 6 weeks in 40 postmenopausal women with NIDDM. Glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), insulin sensitivity, suppressibility of hepatic glucose production, lipoprotein profile and parameters of fibrinolysis were determined. The oestrogen treated group demonstrated a significant decrease of HbA1c and in the normotriglyceridaemic group a significantly increased suppression of hepatic glucose production by insulin. Whole body glucose uptake and concentrations of non-esterified fatty acids did not change. LDL-cholesterol- and apolipoprotein B levels decreased, and HDL-cholesterol, its subfraction HDL2-cholesterol and apolipotrotein A1 increased. The plasma triglyceride level remained similar in both groups. Both the concentration of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 antigen and its active subfraction decreased. Tissue type plasminogen activator activity increased significantly only in the normotriglyceridaemic group. Oestrogen replacement therapy improves insulin sensitivity in liver, glycaemic control, lipoprotein profile and fibrinolysis in postmenopausal women with NIDDM. For a definite answer as to whether oestrogens can be more liberally used in NIDDM patients, long term studies including the effect of progestogens are necessary.     

Relationship between gastric emptying and an alpha-glucosidase inhibitor effect on postprandial hyperglycemia in NIDDM patients

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to examine the relationship between gastric emptying and the efficacy of an alpha-glucosidase inhibitor in NIDDM patients. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Sixteen NIDDM patients (4 patients treated with diet therapy alone and 12 receiving a sulfonylurea) were given 0.6 mg of voglibose daily for 4 weeks. The efficacy of voglibose was assessed by measurement of HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose, and 45- and 120-min postprandial plasma glucose (PPG) and serum insulin concentrations before and after the 4 weeks of voglibose therapy. Gastric emptying was evaluated using the proportional cumulative area under the absorption curve (% AUC) of plasma acetaminophen concentration at 60 min after ingestion of a liquid test meal containing 20 mg/kg of acetaminophen. These measurements were also taken before and after the therapy. RESULTS: The change in the 45-min PPG levels from the fasting state correlated significantly with the % AUC of the plasma acetaminophen concentrations (r = 0.625, P = 0.0096) before the voglibose administrations. The mean 45-min and 2-h PPG levels were reduced significantly after 4 weeks of voglibose (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively). Two-hour postprandial serum insulin concentrations were also significantly reduced at the end of the treatment period (P < 0.05). The changes in the PPG levels between pre- and posttreatment periods correlated significantly with the % AUC of the plasma acetaminophen concentrations before the treatment period (r = 0.499, P = 0.0490; r = 0.713, P = 0.0019, respectively). There was no significant difference in the plasma acetaminophen concentrations between pre- and posttreatment periods. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of gastric emptying affects the efficacy of voglibose therapy in NIDDM patients. Voglibose did not however alter the rate of gastric emptying.     

Acute effects of intraperitoneal versus subcutaneous insulin delivery on glucose homeostasis in patients with NIDDM. Veterans Affairs Implantable Insulin Pump Study Group

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to compare the effect of intraperitoneal versus subcutaneous insulin injection on hepatic glucose production (HGP) and systemic glucose utilization (Rd) in patients with NIDDM. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Eight male volunteers with NIDDM, each of whom had a programmable-rate, implantable insulin pump, were given an injection of insulin (0.15 units/kg body wt) by intraperitoneal or subcutaneous injection on separate days in randomized order. Plasma glucose was kept constant for 5 h using the glucose clamp technique, and HGP and Rd were measured using isotope dilution. RESULTS: Intraperitoneal insulin injection resulted in higher and earlier peak systemic insulin concentrations (1,469 +/- 245 vs. 454 +/- 48 pmol/l, P < 0.01). Glucose Rd doubled within 1 h after intraperitoneal injection and was greater than that attained with subcutaneous injection (3.91 +/- 0.27 vs. 2.60 +/- 0.19 mg.kg-1.min-1, P < 0.01). Intraperitoneal and subcutaneous injections suppressed HGP and plasma free fatty acid to a similar extent during the first 3 h, effects tht persisted through 5 h after subcutaneous insulin injection but waned 3-4 h after intraperitoneal injection. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with NIDDM, intraperitoneal insulin injection achieves more rapid and greater peak values for stimulation of glucose Rd than subcutaneous insulin injection. With regard to HGP and lipolysis, intraperitoneal and subcutaneous injections achieve similar initial suppression but this is maintained for a more limited duration with intraperitoneal as compared with subcutaneous injection. These differences in insulin action seem directly related to the rapidity of insulin absorption with intraperitoneal injection.     

Modification of postprandial hyperglycemia with insulin lispro improves glucose control in patients with type 2 diabetes

OBJECTIVE: Insulin lispro is a rapid-acting analog of human insulin that can be used to target the postprandial rise in plasma glucose. We designed an open-label randomized crossover study of type 2 diabetic patients with secondary failure of sulfonylurea therapy to determine whether improvement of postprandial hyperglycemia would affect total daily glucose control. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Twenty-five type 2 diabetic patients who were poorly controlled on a maximum dose of sulfonylureas were studied in a university hospital clinical research center. In one arm of the study, patients continued therapy with maximum-dose sulfonylureas. In the other arm, patients used a combination therapy with insulin lispro before meals and sulfonylureas. After 4 months, patients were crossed over to the opposite arm. Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and 1- and 2-h postprandial glucose (after a standardized meal), HbA1c, total, HDL, and LDL cholesterol, and triglyceride levels were measured at the end of each arm of the study. RESULTS: Insulin lispro in combination with sulfonylurea therapy significantly reduced 2-h postprandial glucose concentrations compared with sulfonylureas alone, from 18.6 to 14.2 mmol/l (P < 0.0001), and incremental postprandial glucose area from 617.8 to 472.9 mmol.min.1-1 (P < 0.0007). FPG levels were decreased from 10.9 to 8.5 mmol/l (P < 0.0001), and HbA1c values were reduced form 9.0 to 7.1% (P < 0.0001). Total cholesterol was significantly decreased in the lispro arm from 5.44 to 5.10 mmol/l (P < 0.02). HDL cholesterol concentrations were increased in the lispro arm from 0.88 to 0.96 mmol/l (P < 0.01). The patients weighed significantly more after lispro therapy than after sulfonylureas alone, but the difference was small in absolute terms (sulfonylurea therapy alone, 90.6 kg; lispro therapy, 93.8 kg; P < 0.0001). Two episodes of hypoglycemia (glucose concentrations, < 2.8 mmol/l) were reported by the patients while using lispro. CONCLUSIONS: Previously, it has not been possible to address the effect of treatment of postprandial hyperglycemia specifically. We have now shown that the treatment of postprandial hyperglycemia with insulin lispro markedly improves overall glucose control and some lipid parameters in patients with type 2 diabetes.     

Progression of retinopathy after change of treatment from oral antihyperglycemic agents to insulin in patients with NIDDM

OBJECTIVE: In insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, institution of good glycemic control has been shown to retard development of retinopathy even though temporary progression has occurred. Few data have been available from patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). To determine the impact of improved glycemic control on retinopathy in patients with NIDDM, we examined, in a case-control study, the progression of retinopathy in 94 patients who changed treatment from oral antihyperglycemic agents to insulin. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We used the Wisconsin retinopathy scale and related progression of retinopathy during a 2-year observation period to changes in HbA1c after institution of insulin therapy. RESULTS: Progression of retinopathy > or = 3 levels occurred in 23% of the patients and was significantly more common in the patient group in which HbA1c was lowered > or = 3% compared with progression in the group in which HbA1c was lowered < 3% (P = 0.0001; relative risk 3.2; 95% confidence interval 1.5-6.9). CONCLUSIONS: Improved glycemic control as achieved by insulin therapy may be associated with worsening of retinopathy in patients with NIDDM.     

Insulin resistance versus insulin deficiency in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: problems and prospects

A definitive assessment of the relative roles of insulin resistance and insulin deficiency in the etiology of NIDDM is hampered by several problems. 1) Due to better methodology, data on insulin resistance are generally more accurate and consistent than data on insulin deficiency. 2) In source data, case-control studies are prone to selection bias, while epidemiological associations, whether cross-sectional or longitudinal, are liable to misinterpretation. 3) Insulin secretion and action are physiologically interconnected at multiple levels, so that an initial defect in either is likely to lead with time to a deficit in the companion function. The fact that both insulin resistance and impaired insulin release have been found to precede and predict NIDDM in prospective studies may be in part a reflection of just such relatedness. 4) Direct genetic analysis is effective in rarer forms of glucose intolerance (MODY, mitochondrial mutations, etc.) but encounters serious difficulties with typical late-onset NIDDM. Despite these uncertainties, the weight of current evidence supports the view that insulin resistance is very important in the etiology of typical NIDDM for the following reasons: 1) it is found in the majority of patients with the manifest disease; 2) it is only partially reversible by any form of treatment (117); 3) it can be traced back through earlier stages of IGT and high-risk conditions; and 4) it predicts subsequent development of the disease with remarkable consistency in both prediabetic and normoglycemic states. Of conceptual importance is also the fact that the key cellular mechanisms of skeletal muscle insulin resistance (defective stimulation of glucose transport, phosphorylation, and storage into glycogen) have been confirmed in NIDDM subjects by a variety of in vivo techniques [ranging from catheter balance (118) to multiple tracer kinetics (119) to 13C nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (120)], and have been detected also in normoglycemic NIDDM offspring (121). If insulin resistance is a characteristic finding in many cases of NIDDM, insulin-sensitive NIDDM does exist. On the other hand, given the tight homeostatic control of plasma glucose levels in humans, beta-cell dysfunction, relative or absolute, is a sine qua non for the development of diabetes. If insulin deficiency must be present whereas insulin resistance may be present, is this proof that the former is etiologically primary to the latter? If so, do we have convincing evidence that the primacy of insulin deficiency is genetic in nature? The answer to both questions is negative on several accounts. The defect in insulin secretion in overt NIDDM is functionally severe but anatomically modest: beta-cell mass is reduced by 20-40% in patients with long-standing NIDDM (122). Moreover, the insulin secretory deficit is progressively worse with more severe hyperglycemia (123) and recovers considerably upon improving glycemic control (124). These observations indicate that part of the insulin deficiency is acquired (through glucose toxicity, lipotoxicity, or both). In addition, although insulin deficiency is necessary for diabetes, it may not always be sufficient to cause NIDDM. In fact, subtle defects in the beta-cell response to glucose may be widespread in the population (108, 125) and only cause frank hyperglycemia when obesity/insulin resistance stress the secretory machinery. Conceivably, there could be beta-cell dysfunction without NIDDM just as there is insulin resistance without diabetes. Incidentally, any defect in insulin secretion, whether in normoglycemic or hyperglycemic persons, could be due to other factors than primary beta-cell dysfunction: amyloid deposits in the pancreas (126), changes in insulin secretagogues (amylin, GLP-1, GIP, galanin) (127-130), early intrauterine malnutrition (131). Finally, the predictive power of early changes in insulin secretion for the development of typical NIDDM is generally lower than that of insulin     

Insulin resistance: a multifaceted syndrome responsible for NIDDM, obesity, hypertension, dyslipidaemia and atherosclerosis

Insulin resistance syndrome (IRS) has the potential to explain a large group of common metabolic and cardiovascular disorders [e.g., obesity, non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM), hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, hypercoagulability] which are all in themselves cardiovascular risk factors. This contribution firstly reviews the convincing evidence from glucose-clamp studies that all of these conditions are characterised by the presence of combined insulin resistance and hyperinsulinaemia, and secondly examines the relationships of the components of this syndrome to coronary artery disease and to the rational choice of antihypertensive therapy.     

The Friedreich's ataxia mutation confers cellular sensitivity to oxidant stress which is rescued by chelators of iron and calcium and inhibitors of apoptosis

Interleukin 12 (IL-12) exhibits anti-tumor activity in a variety of laboratory models. Although IL-12 itself activates strong anti-tumor activity, the combination of vaccine therapy with IL-2-transduced tumor cells and systemic rIL-12 has been shown to cure tumor-bearing mice more effectively than either rIL-12 or IL-2-transduced tumor vaccines alone. In the present study, regression of brain tumors established in naive mice was obtained by combined administration of an intratumoral injection of a single dose of IL-2-producing glioma cells (SR/IL-2 cells) and recombinant IL-12. Intraperitoneal rIL-12 administration substantially delayed the growth of s.c. inoculated gliomas, but not of gliomas located in the brain. Although vaccination with SR/IL-2 cells alone was not effective against s.c. inoculated gliomas, the combination therapy of vaccination with irradiated SR/IL-2 cells and systemic rIL-12 was more effective than rIL-12 alone. In our brain-tumor model, intratumoral administration of irradiated SR/IL-2 cells and of rIL-12 remarkably prolonged survival as compared with untreated mice. Efficacy was reduced when studies were performed in mice depleted of CD8+ cells or NK cells. Mice cured of their intracerebral tumors by combined administration of SR/IL-2 cells and rIL-12 demonstrated protective immunity upon rechallenge. In summary, the therapeutic potential for control of tumor growth by intratumoral administration of IL-2-producing glioma cells and rIL-12 may be useful in the development of treatment for patients with glioma.     

Location and frequency of polymorphic positions in the mtDNA control region of individuals from Germany

The progress of knowledge relating to non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) is associated with new therapeutic developments. Their different respective targets allow to classify them in drugs stimulating insulin secretion (glimepiride, repaglinide, glucagon-like peptide 1), medications reducing insulin resistance (thiazolidinediones) or in insulinmimetic agents (vanadium). Alpha glucosidase inhibitors, available in France since 1993, constitute another therapeutic approach, reducing postprandial hyperglycemia by delaying the digestion of complex carbohydrates. These new medications, safer and sometimes effective in a single daily administration, represent an alternative to classic oral antidiabetic agents allowing therapeutic combinations and a more global management of NIDDM.     

Topographical localization of iron in brains of the aged fat-tailed dwarf lemur (Cheirogaleus medius) and gray lesser mouse lemur (Microcebus murinus)

AIMS: In circulating lymphocytes of NIDDM patients pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH), the major determinant in glucose consumption through oxidative pathways, is poorly active. The aim of this study is to examine whether sulphonylurea drug treatment revives PDH activity in circulating lymphocytes from NIDDM patients. METHODS: Twenty normal-weight individuals with NIDDM were enrolled in this study. They had maintained their glycaemic levels close to normal by means of a restricted diet that had no longer been successful in the proceeding 2 months. The treatment protocol consisted in 160 mg gliclazide daily for 5 weeks. Twenty healthy subjects, matched for age, body mass index and gender, were enrolled as a control group. Patients, before and after treatment, as well as controls were tested for PDH activity in their circulating lymphocytes. Nine other untreated patients and nine healthy subjects, with the above mentioned characteristics, were recruited for the assay of PDH activity in their circulating lymphocytes before and after exposure, in vitro, to gliclazide, to insulin, and to gliclazide and insulin in combination. RESULTS: In gliclazide-treated NIDDM patients, PDH activity in circulating lymphocytes recovered. In vitro, in circulating lymphocytes of untreated patients and controls insulin at 5 microU ml(-1) was ineffective and highly effective, respectively, in raising enzyme activity; gliclazide at 10 ng ml(-1) was ineffective on PDH in both groups, but in combination with insulin at 5 microU ml(-1) in both groups PDH was as active as in cells of controls exposed to insulin only. In cells of controls, gliclazide alone at 25-50 ng ml(-1) caused enzyme activation, whereas above 50 ng ml(-1) it caused inhibition; in cells of patients below 50 ng ml(-1) it had no effects, but at 50 ng ml(-1) and above raised enzyme activity to the basal level of controls. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that free gliclazide concentrations determine recovery of PDH activity in circulating lymphocytes of treated patients through drug-mediated enhanced insulin control over PDH or through the drug alone.     

Social phobia. Longitudinal course and long-term outcome of cognitive-behavioral treatment

Interest in social phobia has increased dramatically in the past decade, and our knowledge of this previously understudied disorder has increased as well. We now know that social phobia is a chronic condition and that patients with this disorder are unlikely to experience significant improvement without intervention. It is also a highly prevalent condition affecting as many as 13% of the adult population of the Unites States. Although our understanding of the causes of social phobia remains limited, we do know that it is associated with serious impairment and disability in multiple spheres. Thus, the development of treatments with proven long-term efficacy is an important research goal. In this article, we have reviewed studies that examined either exposure, cognitive restructuring, social skills training, or some combination of these treatments. Here, we summarize the major findings of this review. Exposure has fared well as a treatment for social phobia and, in every case, within-group analyses show that patients have improved after treatment. Methodologic problems in some studies, however, limit the conclusions that can be drawn about the comparative efficacy of exposure, social skills training, and relaxation therapy. Conceptual models of social phobia have stressed the importance of cognitive processes in the development and maintenance of social phobia and much attention has been directed at the long-term efficacy of cognitive-behavioral techniques. It has been hypothesized that exposure plus cognitive restructuring would be a particularly effective combination and several methodologically sound studies have examined this combination. These studies have demonstrated consistently clinically significant within-group changes and superiority to control conditions. Heimberg's CBGT is probably the most widely studied of these treatments. CBGT has been shown to be more effective than an equally credible attention-placebo group. Patients receiving CBGT have maintained their advantage over patients in the attention-placebo group, even 5 years after treatment although flaws in that follow-up study limit generalizability of its results. Generalized and nongeneralized social phobic patients respond equivalently to this highly integrated treatment, and it has been applied effectively by researchers outside the center where it was developed. Despite the successes of combined exposure and cognitive restructuring treatments, it remains unclear as to what the effective component(s) of these and similar treatments are and, therefore, whether or not the integration of therapy components is really necessary. A number of the studies reviewed addressed this question with mixed results. Three studies showed that the combination therapy was superior to either treatment alone. There is also evidence that patients treated with exposure only may show some deterioration during follow-up whereas patients treated with cognitive restructuring and exposure may continue to improve. Still, other studies found no differences in long-term outcome among exposure alone, RET, or the combined treatment. Hope et al found that exposure alone was as effective as an integrated treatment combining exposure and cognitive restructuring (CBGT), and Taylor and colleagues (submitted for publication, 1995) reported that exposure was not enhanced by initial treatment with cognitive restructuring. These results are disappointing in light of all that has been written about the likely benefits of combining cognitive and behavioral therapy in the treatment of social phobia. For example, it has been hypothesized that fear of negative evaluation is a key factor in social phobia and that change in this construct should be the goal of treatment. There is some research that supports this claim and other evidence that suggests that exposure alone is not particularly effective in producing those changes. Butler concluded that the treatment of social phobia is made more difficult whe