A new osteotomy for the correction of mandibular prognathism: techniques and rationale of the intraoral vertico-sagittal ramus osteotomy.

The sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) and the intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO) are long established methods for correcting mandibular prognathism, each having its own advantages. However, both procedures have the same disadvantage: the potential for postoperative condylar displacement. The displacement of the condyle is mainly due to the fact that the osteotomy plane is not parallel to the original sagittal plane in which the mandible is repositioned. The author has developed a new ramus osteotomy since 1985 in which the osteotomy plane is theoretically parallel to the original sagittal plane and thereby attempting to decrease the incidence of condylar displacement. This osteotomy was designed additionally to decrease neurosensory disturbances and has the advantages of both methods, and therefore has been named 'intraoral vertico-sagittal ramus osteotomy (IVSRO)'. Initial experience with the 24 prognathic patients operated on by means of the IVSRO indicated excellent clinical results. It has been noted clinically that the IVSRO is very effective in reducing postoperative iatrogenic TMJ symptoms and in treating preoperative TMJ symptoms. It has the additional effect of reducing neurosensory disturbances. This osteotomy seems to be more applicable in mandibular prognathism with excessive flaring of the ramus, particularly that associated with TMJ dysfunction, because the IVSRO has a 'condylotomy effect' and its splitting plane diverges less from the original sagittal plane than that of the SSRO and the IVRO.     

Intra-oral vertical ramus osteotomy: a modified technique for correction of mandibular prognathism.

Intra-oral vertical ramus osteotomy is a useful procedure for correction of mandibular prognathism. However, a major disadvantage is poor visibility of the operating field. A modified technique that improves visibility without higher morbidity is described.     

Surgical morbidities of sagittal split ramus osteotomy versus intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy for the correction of mandibular prognathism: a randomized clinical trial

The sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) and intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO) are two common orthognathic procedures for the treatment of mandibular prognathism. This randomized clinical trial compared the surgical morbidities between SSRO and IVRO for patients with mandibular prognathism over the first 2 years postoperative. Ninety-eight patients (40 male, 58 female) with a mean age of 24.4 ± 3.5 years underwent bilateral SSRO (98 sides) or IVRO (98 sides) as part or all of their orthognathic surgery. IVRO presented less short-term and long-term surgical morbidity in general. The SSRO group had a greater incidence of inferior alveolar nerve deficit at all follow-up time points (P <  0.01). There was more TMJ pain at 6 weeks (P =  0.047) and 3 months (P =  0.001) postoperative in the SSRO group. The SSRO group also presented more minor complications, which were related to titanium plate exposure and infection. There were no major complications for either technique in this study. Despite the need for intermaxillary fixation, IVRO appears to be associated with less surgical morbidity than SSRO when performed as a mandibular setback procedure to treat mandibular prognathism.     

Extraoral subcondylar ramus osteotomy for correction of mandibular prognathism: The surgical technique and complications

1178 patients with mandibular prognathism and/or asymmetry, in some cases combined with maxillary retrognathism, were treated by extraoral horizontal or oblique ramus osteotomy during the period from 1939 to 1989. The described percutaneous retromandibular approach is a simple, rapid and reliable technique which can usually be performed under local anaesthesia. Very few complications, particularly neurological, were observed. These aspects justify consideration of this technique when indications for a simple, straight set-back procedure of the mandible exist, and there is no tendency to bite-opening. However, the method demands intermaxillary fixation for 6-9 weeks postoperatively.     

Stability after vertical subcondylar ramus osteotomy for correction of mandibular prognathism

A cephalometric analysis of the positional changes of the mandible and the upper and lower incisors following vertical subcondylar ramus osteotomy was performed on 80 patients. The patients were prognathic without laterognathism or open bite and all the patients had preoperative orthodontic treatment. 40 patients were operated with an intraoral (IVSO) and 40 with an extraoral approach (EVSO). Both groups showed postoperatively posterior rotation of the mandible, shortening of the posterior facial height, increase in anterior facial height and extrusion of the incisors in both jaws. A significantly greater reduction of posterior facial height was observed in the EVSO-group, but otherwise the 2 groups did not reveal any statistically significant positional differences. The material was sub-divided into 2 groups 1 with (n = 32) and one group without (n = 48) extra skeletal (nasomandibular) fixation in addition to the intermaxillary fixation. Significantly less positional changes of the incisors and less increase of anterior facial height was found in the group with skeletal fixation, but the influence on other skeletal alterations was limited. After release of the intermaxillary fixation, the only difference between the groups was intrusion of the earlier extruded incisors, most pronounced in the group without skeletal fixation.     

Postoperative changes in mandibular prognathism surgically treated by intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy

This study investigated short- and long-term postoperative skeletal changes following intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO) for mandibular prognathism, as determined from lateral cephalograms. The subjects were 20 patients with mandibular prognathism who had undergone surgical orthodontic treatment combined with IVRO. Lateral cephalograms were taken at six time points: 1 month before surgery, and 1 day, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and approximately 2 years after surgery. Intermaxillary fixation (IMF) with four monocortical screws was maintained for 1 week in all patients. Mean posterior movement of the menton (Me) was 5.9 mm at surgery. 3 months after surgery, the FMA and FH-CorMe angles had increased 6.3 and 6.2 degrees, respectively, indicating clockwise rotation of the distal segment of the mandible. This rotation was observed in all 20 patients, suggesting that postoperative rotation of the mandible in the postoperative short term is likely to occur after IVRO and could be considered an adaptation of the mastication system newly established by surgery. In the long term after IVRO, Me had moved anteriorly by only 0.9 mm and the relapse ratio was 15.3%. These findings suggest the excellent long-term stability of surgical orthodontic treatment combined with IVRO in patients with mandibular prognathism.     

Skeletal stability after surgical correction of mandibular prognathism by vertical ramus osteotomy.

The purpose of the study was to assess skeletal stability following combined surgical-orthodontic management of 52 adults with severe mandibular prognathism. Lateral cephalograms taken 1 week before surgery, within 1 week post-surgery and approximately 1 year after operation were studied by means of eight variables and a constructive stable reproducible reference system. The surgical procedure of choice was a bilateral vertical ramus osteotomy through an extra-oral approach. In all cases the condyles were left passively in the articular fossa and no attempt at their active repositioning was made. The patients were randomly allocated to an osteosynthesis or non-osteosynthesis group with regard to intramandibular fixation. Intermaxillary fixation lasted 6 weeks and an interocclusal wafer was used in all cases during this period. The findings of this study showed that during the post-operative period there was a trend for posterior rotation of the mandibular corpus (P less than 0.001). This pattern was also characterized by an increase (P less than 0.001) of the lower anterior face height and an improvement of the angle of convexity (P less than 0.001). These changes occurring in a direction so that the dentoskeletal profile became less concave, did not tend to reverse the goal of operation and cannot be considered as detrimental. No significant differences (P greater than 0.05) were found between the groups without and with osteosynthesis.     

Evaluation of soft tissue profile following intraoral ramus osteotomy in Chinese adults with mandibular prognathism

Twenty-five Chinese adults with mandibular prognathism were treated with either the intraoral vertical subcondylar osteotomy or the bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy. The patients were kept in maxillomandibular fixation for 6 to 8 weeks while osteosynthesis was achieved with the use of intraosseous wiring. Serial lateral cephalograms were taken presurgery and between 12 and 26 months postsurgery, and specific soft and hard tissue points were digitized on a computer. The mean mandibular setback postsurgically was 8.4 +/- 3.2 mm, with a 5.2-degree reduction in point A-nasion-point B angle. Posterior movement of pogonion, point B and the mandibular incisal edge was accompanied by posterior movement of 95% at soft tissue pogonion (r = .96), 89% at soft tissue point B (r = .83), and 67% at labrale inferius (r = .81), respectively. The correlation between changes in the labrale superius and mandibular setback appeared to be dependent on both the amount of mandibular setback and the degree of mandibular rotation during the setback surgery. The presently reported ratios of the soft tissue response to hard tissue movement vary from those reported in white patients by other researchers, which confirms the need for different ratios for different racial types.     

Inverted-L osteotomy for correction of mandibular prognathism after relapse.

As more orthognathic surgery is performed, more case of relapse can be expected. A case of re-operation of a recurrent prognathism has been reported. An alternative surgical approach was used because the planned operation could not be accomplished. However, the implications of the use of the technique are broader than the single example given in this report. The inverted-L technique, because of its similarity to the combined oblique osteotomy and coronoidectomy for correction of extreme prognathism, provides an alternative procedure that leaves a greater proportion of the masticatory musculature in its natural position. In addition, with the development of techniques and instrumentation for intraoral approaches to oblique osteotomy of the ramus, the feasibility of an intraoral inverted-L osteotomy becomes apparent and the approach merits further consideration.     

Sliding osteotomy in the mandibular body for correction of prognathism.

To overcome some of the disadvantages of the mandibular body ostectomy, a sliding osteotomy accomplished by parallel sectionings of the mandible in the regions of the first premolars was used for the treatment of mandibular prognathism in two cases. The osteotomy was performed by an intraoral approach without any damage to the contents of the mental foramen. The anterior segment could be moved back to any desirable position without losing optimum bony contact. An adequate blood supply to the anterior segment was maintained by a large area of periosteal attachment on the lingual side. The method is effective for correction of mandibular prognathism in which a good occlusion cannot be expected by a ramus osteotomy.     

Recovery of oral opening following sagittal ramus osteotomy for mandibular prognathism

A review of 40 cases of sagittal splitting of the mandible for reduction of mandibular prognathism showed that maximum oral opening recovered to presurgical limits without the use of mechanical aids. This recovery occurred within nine months following release of maxillomandibular fixation.     

Comparison of the quality of life changes of patients receiving sagittal split ramus osteotomy or intraoral vertical subsigmoid osteotomy for mandibular prognathism

Clinical Oral Investigations - To investigate and compare the effect of two orthognathic procedures for mandibular setback, namely, sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) and intraoral vertical...     

Plate fixation of extra-oral subcondylar ramus osteotomy for correction of mandibular prognathism: clinical aspects and short term stability.

AIM: The present study describes an extra-oral approach for subcondylar oblique ramus osteotomy using stable fixation for setback of the mandible. The aim was to investigate the incidence of neurosensory disturbances of the mandibular nerve, evaluate facial scar appearance, and assess skeletal stability following the procedure. METHODS: Forty-two consecutive patients with mandibular prognathism were operated upon using the subcondylar oblique ramus osteotomy and plate fixation. The patients were followed up for 6 months following surgery. Intra-operative and postoperative complications, neurosensory function, and facial scar characteristics were recorded. Lateral cephalograms were available immediately before operation, and immediately after operation and 6 months postoperatively. Skeletal stability was based on cephalometric assessment. RESULTS: Among the 19 patients operated earliest, neurosensory disturbances were recorded in five individuals at the 6 month follow-up. In the subsequent group of 23 patients, no disturbances were reported. All but two patients were not concerned about the facial scar 6 months postoperatively. Mean anterior relapse at the 6 month follow-up was 0.5 mm, representing 9% of the surgical setback. CONCLUSION: Extra-oral subcondylar oblique ramus osteotomy with plate fixation is a stable procedure with a low incidence of neurosensory disturbances if the osteotomy is placed well behind the mandibular foramen. Facial scar appearance was rarely a matter of concern to the patients.