A prospective randomized trial of 5-fluorouracil versus 5-fluorouracil and high-dose leucovorin versus 5-fluorouracil and methotrexate in previously untreated patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma

Seventy-four previously untreated patients with metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma were prospectively randomized into one of three treatment regimens: (1) 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 450 mg/m2 as an intravenous (IV) bolus daily for five days or toxicity, then 200 mg/m2 IV bolus every other day for six doses; (2) methotrexate (MTX) 50 mg/m2 in normal saline by IV infusion over four hours followed by an IV bolus of 5-FU 600 mg/m2. This was administered weekly for 4 weeks and then every 2 weeks. (3) Leucovorin 500 mg/m2 in a two-hour IV infusion of normal saline with 5-FU 600 mg/m2 as an IV bolus one hour after the Leucovorin began every week for 6 weeks. The combined complete and partial response rates in the three regimens were 11%, 5%, and 48%, respectively (P = .0009). The median duration of response in the 5-FU and Leucovorin regimen was 10 months. There was no statistically significant difference between the treatment regimens with respect to survival time (P = .6). Toxicity in the 5-FU and Leucovorin regimen was predominantly diarrhea (13 of 30 patients, 40%). In this regimen, eight of 13 patients (52%) who developed diarrhea not only required a dose reduction of 5-FU, but also hospitalization for IV hydration. The predominant toxicity in the 5-FU alone regimen and the 5-FU and MTX regimen was leukopenia. One drug-related death occurred in each regimen.     

Advanced colorectal carcinoma. A prospective randomized trial of sequential methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin versus 5-fluorouracil alone

One hundred and twenty-five previously untreated patients bearing metastatic or advanced recurrent (inoperable) colorectal carcinoma and measurable disease were prospectively randomized. Those in arm A received 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), 1,200 mg/m2 i.v. infusion over 2 h, while those in arm B received methotrexate (MTX), 200 mg/m2 i.v. (push injection), followed 20 h later by 5-FU, 1,200 mg/m2 i.v. infusion over 2 h, plus calcium leucovorin (LV), 25 mg i.m. every 6 h for eight doses beginning 24 h after MTX administration. Cycles were repeated every 15 days. All patients receiving treatment were evaluable for toxicity and survival, and 118 patients were evaluable for response. The objective regression rate (complete plus partial response) was 12% (7 of 58) in arm A and 28% (17 of 60) in arm B (p = 0.049). No change was observed in 24% (14 of 58) in arm A and in 35% (21 of 60) in arm B (p = 0.28), while progressive disease was registered in 64% (37 of 58) and 37% (22 of 60) in arms A and B, respectively (p = 0.006). Median duration of response was 3 months in arm A and 5 months in arm B (p = 0.39). The median survival was 8.3 months in arm A and 11.2 months in arm B (p = 0.25). No statistically significant differences were found when objective regression and survival were related to site of primary tumor, performance status, and number of involved organs. There were two drug-related deaths in arm B due to severe myelosuppression followed by mucositis and sepsis. Of nonhematologic toxicities, diarrhea was more frequently observed in arm B, as were mucositis and infectious complications. Our results indicate that the sequential schedule MTX-5-FU-LV with 20-h intervals between MTX and 5-FU is superior in terms of objective regression to 5-FU alone given at the dose and schedule used in the present study. However, MTX-5-FU-LV did not have a significant impact on survival.     

Chemotherapy of advanced colorectal cancer. A randomized trial of sequential methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil

Fifty-five patients with advanced colorectal cancer were entered into a randomized controlled clinical trial to evaluate order of administration and sequential methotrexate (MTX) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) therapy. Patients were randomized to receive either MTX, 250 mg/m2, followed 1 h later by 5-FU, 600 mg/m2, or 5-FU followed 1 h later by MTX in the same doses. Fifty-four patients were evaluable for response, of whom 15 (28%) achieved objective partial tumor response. There were no significant differences between the two sequences in response rate, time to treatment failure, or survival duration. The results of this study do not indicate a clinically significant difference between the two sequences tested, in which MTX preceded or followed 5-FU by 1 h. Determination of the value of these drugs given sequentially at longer intervals must await appropriate controlled trials.     

Accelerated versus standard cyclophosphamide, epirubicin and 5-fluorouracil or cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil: a randomized phase III trial in locally advanced breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of a dose-dense primary chemotherapy on pathological response rate (pCR) in patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) treated with combined modality therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Stage IIIA/IIIB patients received three courses of induction chemotherapy (ICT) with cyclophosphamide, epirubicin and 5-fluorouracil (CEF) followed by local therapy (total mastectomy or segmental mastectomy with axillary nodes dissection) and adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) with three courses of CEF alternated with three courses of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil (CMF). Patients were randomized to receive ICT and ACT every 3 weeks (arm A, 'standard treatment') or every 2 weeks with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) support (arm B, 'dose-dense treatment'). In both arms radiotherapy was administered after the end of chemotherapy (in selected cases) and patients with hormonal receptor-positive tumors received tamoxifen for 5 years. RESULTS: A total of 150 patients were randomized (77 arm A and 73 arm B) and demographics were well balanced between the two arms. Compliance to treatment was excellent: 95% and 93% of patients in arms A and B, respectively, completed the treatment program with no modification or delay. Median duration of treatment (ICT+local+ACT) was 183 days (range 0-265) in arm A and 139 days (0-226) in arm B. The average relative dose intensity (ARDI) of chemotherapy was 1.3 with a 30% increase in the dose intensity in arm B in comparison with arm A. No difference in clinical [62%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 49% to 73.2%] and pathological response rates to ICT was observed between the two arms. Median follow-up was 5 years (range 1-96 months); median disease-free survivals were 4.8 years in arm A and 4.5 years in arm B. Median overall survival was 7.8 years in standard therapy: this figure has not yet been reached in the dose-dense treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In LABC a dose-dense regimen, while allowing a 30% increase in the dose intensity of chemotherapy, did not provide significant improvement in pathological response rates. However, accelerated chemotherapy reduced the duration of the combined-modality program (6.1 versus 4.6 months) with no additional toxicities.     

Combination chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil 5-day infusion in the therapy of advanced gastric cancer: a phase II trial.

Fifty-six patients with measurable or evaluable advanced gastric cancer were treated with cisplatin, 100 mg/m2 in continuous infusion of 24 hours, and 5-fluorouracil, 1000 mg/m2/day (by continuous 5-day infusion) every 4 weeks. Three patients were found ineligible for the study. A response rate of 41% (22/53) was obtained (95% confidence interval: 28%-54%), with a median duration of remission of 10.2 months and an overall median survival time of 10.6 months. Leukopenia and thrombocytopenia were mild. Nausea and vomiting were common, and 23.5% of the patients had grade 3 stomatitis. Peripheral neuropathy and renal insufficiency increased with the number of cycles, representing the cumulative dose-limiting toxicity. This study indicates that the combination of cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil is synergistic or at least has additive antitumor activity. We think that this association of 2 drugs should be considered for further phase III clinical trials.     

Abbreviated course of radiation therapy in older patients with glioblastoma multiforme: a prospective randomized clinical trial.

PURPOSE: To prospectively compare standard radiation therapy (RT) with an abbreviated course of RT in older patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred patients with GBM, age 60 years or older, were randomly assigned after surgery to receive either standard RT (60 Gy in 30 fractions over 6 weeks) or a shorter course of RT (40 Gy in 15 fractions over 3 weeks). The primary end point was overall survival. The secondary end points were proportionate survival at 6 months, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and corticosteroid requirement. HRQoL was assessed using the Karnofsky performance status (KPS) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain (FACT-Br). RESULTS: All patients had died at the time of analysis. Overall survival times measured from randomization were similar at 5.1 months for standard RT versus 5.6 months for the shorter course (log-rank test, P =.57). The survival probabilities at 6 months were also similar at 44.7% for standard RT versus 41.7% for the shorter course (lower-bound 95% CI, -13.7). KPS scores varied markedly but were not significantly different between the two groups (Wilcoxon test, P =.63). Low completion rates of the FACT-Br (45%) precluded meaningful comparisons between the two groups. Of patients completing RT as planned, 49% of patients (standard RT) versus 23% required an increase in posttreatment corticosteroid dosage (chi(2) test, P =.02). CONCLUSION: There is no difference in survival between patients receiving standard RT or short-course RT. In view of the similar KPS scores, decreased increment in corticosteroid requirement, and reduced treatment time, the abbreviated course of RT seems to be a reasonable treatment option for older patients with GBM.     

Sequential methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil therapy for gastric cancer patients with peritoneal dissemination: a retrospective study

Background. Most gastric cancer patients with peritoneal dissemination have been excluded from clinical studies because they usually have no measurable lesions. They also have a high risk of toxicity because of complications such as intestinal obstruction and ascites. We conducted a retrospective analysis to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of sequential methotrexate (MTX) and 5-flurorouracil (5FU) therapy for this population. Methods. This analysis was based on 56 consecutive chemotherapy-naive patients with confirmed peritoneal dissemination of gastric cancer who were being treated with sequential MTX/5FU. The therapy comprised a weekly schedule of MTX 100 mg/m², given as a bolus infusion 3 h prior to a bolus infusion of 5FU 600 mg/m². Leucovorin 10 mg/m² was administered six times, every 6 h, starting 24 h after MTX administration. Results. Evidence of peritoneal dissemination was confirmed by laparotomy in 16 patients, by cytologic examination of ascites in 11 patients, and by clinical imaging in 29 patients (15 with ascites, 13 with intestinal obstruction; in 10 of the 29 patients, detection was by barium enema or computed tomography [CT] scan). Neutropenia of grade 3 or worse and anemia were observed in 8 (14%) and 10 (18%) of the 56 patients, respectively. There was one treatment-related death due to neutropenic sepsis. Of the 26 patients with measurable lesions, 9 showed a response (36%). The median survival time and median time to treatment failure were 259 days and 167 days, respectively. Objective improvement of ascites was seen in 13 of 26 patients (50%), including 5 with showed complete disappearance of ascites. Seven of the 15 patients (47%) with intestinal obstruction showed resolution, and 8 of the 21 patients (38%) who needed nutritional support before the treatment were free of that support for a median duration of 220 days after the completion of the treatment. Forty-seven of the 56 patients (84%) could be treated at outpatient clinics. Conclusions. This regimen may be of clinical benefit for patients with peritoneal dissemination of gastric cancer. Received: August 24, 2001 / Accepted: October 19, 2001     

A Northern California Oncology Group randomized trial of leucovorin plus 5-fluorouracil versus sequential methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin in patients with advanced colorectal cancer who failed treatment with 5-fluorouracil or 5-fluorodeoxyuridine alone

The current study was initiated to confirm preliminary reports that 20% or more of patients with colorectal cancer who fail treatment with 5-fluorouracil (FUra) will respond to treatment with either leucovorin plus FUra or with sequential methotrexate, FUra, leucovorin. One hundred two patients with advanced, measureable colorectal cancer who failed treatment with FUra and/or 5-fluorodeoxyuridine (FUdR) were randomized to treatment with either high-dose leucovorin plus FUra (Arm B) or sequential methotrexate, FUra, leucovorin (Arm C). In this interim report, 92 patients were evaluable for toxicity and 89 patients were evaluable for response. Grade 3 or 4 nonhematologic toxicity which was primarily gastrointestinal was experienced by 25% of patients on both treatment arms during at least 1 treatment cycle. Hematologic toxicity was minimal. Among 43 evaluable patients on Arm B, there were 2 complete responses (5%) and 1 minor response (3%). Among 46 evaluable patients on Arm C, there was 1 complete response (2%), 1 partial response (2%), and 6 minor responses (14%). The median time to treatment failure was 2.2 months on Arm B and 3.5 months on Arm C. The median survival was 8.3 months on Arm B and 8.7 months on Arm C. Colorectal cancers that are resistant to FUra are cross-resistant to both experimental combinations.     

Biochemical modulation of 5-fluorouracil: A randomized comparison of sequential methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin versus sequential 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with advanced symptomatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND: The optimal chemotherapy for advanced colorectal carcinoma isnot known. Two regimens, both based upon biochemical modulationof 5-FU, were compared in a randomized multicenter trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 202 symptomatic patients were randomly allocatedto receive either sequential methotrexate, 250 mg/m², duringthe first 2 hours and 5-FU, 500 mg/m², at hours 3 and 23 followedby leucovorin rescue initiated at hour 24 (15 mg x 8) (MFL)or sequential 5-FU 500 mg/m² followed by leucovorin 60 mg/m²30–40 minutes later, on days 1 and 2 (FLv). Treatmentswere repeated every 14 days for eight courses and then every3 to 4 weeks. Four patients were unevaluable. RESULTS: The two treatments were equally effective with respect to objectiveresponse rates (complete (CR) + partial (PR), MFL 17%, FLv 21%),subjective response rates (symptom relief in the absence ofsevere adverse effects, 45% vs. 37%), and survival (median 7.5vs. 9 months). All responses lasted at least 4 months. Overall,toxicity was low and comparable between the groups, but serioustoxicity was more common in the MFL group. CONCLUSIONS: Since FLv is easier to administer and carries less risk forserious toxicity, it should be recommended as a first-line treatmentbefore MFL. On either regimen, about 40% of symptomatic patientscan expect palliation, i.e., symptomatic relief without severeadverse effects, for at least 4 months. biochemical modulation, chemotherapy, colorectal cancer, 5-fluorouracil, subjective response     

Sequential methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil therapy for gastric cancer patients with bone metastasis

Background. Patients with bone metastasis of gastric cancer occasionally experience disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), with a very poor prognosis. Methods. We treated 18 gastric cancer patients with bone metastasis with sequential methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (sequential MTX/5-FU therapy). The treatment schedule comprised weekly administration of methotrexate (MTX; 100 mg/m², i.v. bolus) followed by 5-fluorouracil (5-FU; 600 mg/m², i.v. bolus) after an interval of 3 h. Calcium leucovorin (10 mg/m², p.o. or i.v.) was administered six times, every 6 h starting 24 h after the administration of MTX. Results. In 11 patients with measurable metastatic lesions, the response rate was 64% (7/11). Nine patients (50%) had DIC before the initiation of chemotherapy, and 8 of them (89%) recovered from it. Two of these 9 patients (22%) survived for more than 1 year. The median survival times for all patients and for the 9 with DIC were 186 and 113 days, respectively. Grade 4 leukopenia was observed in 3 patients (17%). No treatment-related deaths occurred. Conclusion. Sequential MTX/5-FU therapy may have palliative potential and may be a feasible treatment for gastric cancer patients with bone metastasis with or without DIC. Received: December 10, 1999 / Accepted: January 28, 2000     

Comparison of CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil) with a rotational crossing and a sequential intensification regimen in advanced breast cancer: a prospective randomized study

The Italian Oncology Group for Clinical Research tested two experimental chemotherapy strategies in an attempt to improve the results achievable with conventional chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer. One hundred sixty-two patients were randomly allocated as follows: (a) to the conventional cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy regimen (CMF); (b) to a rotational crossing program (ROT-CROSS); or (c) to a sequential intensification program (SEQ-INT). The same single agents (C, M, F, cisplatin, etoposide, and doxorubicin) were administered in both experimental arms, but following a different policy. The SEQ-INT program induced a significantly higher complete response (32% vs. 6%, p = 0.0006) and objective response rate (72% vs. 42%, p = 0.0047) than CMF did. There were no differences in survival between CMF and either experimental arm. A number of side effects were significantly more with both experimental chemotherapies than with CMF, but the treatments were generally tolerable. Although some caution is required when interpreting a significant advantage found between an entire chemotherapeutic strategy and a single conventional combination, this study documents the potential therapeutic advantage of administering different sequential chemotherapies, and changing each at the time of maximum result without waiting for a progression. The impressive cytoreductive effects achievable with this policy (SEQ-INT) in metastatic disease merit further investigation in the adjuvant setting.     

Sequential therapy with methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil in the treatment of advanced colorectal carcinoma

Twenty-nine patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma were entered in this study to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of a sequential chemotherapeutic schedule with methotrexate (MTX), 200 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) (push injection) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), 1,200 mg/m2 in continuous IV infusion, using a 20-hour time interval. All patients received calcium leucovorin (LV), 25 mg, intramuscularly (IM) every six hours for eight doses beginning 24 hours after methotrexate administration. Courses were administered every 15 days. Of the 24 patients evaluable for response, 11 (46%) had major objective regressions (one complete remission [CR] and ten partial remissions [PR]). The survival rate of patients who responded to treatment was 60% at 16 months, whereas patients with no change and those in whom the disease progressed had a median survival of 9 months and 3 months, respectively. The median duration of response has not yet been reached in patients who presented objective tumor regression, and was 7.5 months in those with no change. Significant differences were found between objective regression and no change (P less than .0005) and between no change and tumor progression (P less than .05). All patients were evaluable for toxicity. There were three toxic-related deaths (10%) because of severe myelosuppresion, sepsis, and hemorrhage. These promising results, despite important toxicity, reveal the synergism between the two chemotherapeutic agents and also indicate that the response rate achieved could be a consequence of the 20-hour interval and high dose of 5-FU. Further studies are necessary to determine the optimal time interval and the adequate 5-FU dose.     

A randomized clinical trial with a weekly regimen of 5-fluorouracil with or without folinic acid in advanced gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas: a preliminary report

Eighty patients with advanced gastrointestinal tumors (64% with colorectal cancer) entered a phase III prospective randomized study with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) vs 5-FU + folinic acid (FA) The treatment included 5-FU, 600 mg/m2/week for 6 weeks, given as i.v. bolus alone (arm A), or administered by rapid injection half-way through a one-hour infusion of FA, 200 mg/m2/week for 6 weeks (arm B). Partial remission (PR) was achieved in 1 out of 30 (3%) evaluable patients for 6 months in arm A, and in 10 out of 34 (29%) patients in arm B, with a median duration of 8 months (range 6-17) (comparison of the response rate: P = 0.005). In patients with colorectal cancer the response rate was 5% and 27% in arm A and in arm B respectively (P = 0.06). Two patients, who were resistant to 5-FU alone, achieved PR after treatment with 5-FU + FA. Diarrhea was observed in 14/42 patients (33%) in arm B (grade 1-2 in 10 and grade 3 in 4) and in 2/38 patients (5%) in arm A (P = 0.005). Other side effects such as nausea/vomiting, myelosuppression and stomatitis were infrequent and of mild intensity in both arms. No statistical difference in survival was detected when comparing the two groups (estimated median survival 8 months and 11 months for arm A and arm B respectively). These results seem to indicate that the weekly regimen of 5-FU + FA has a superior response rate compared to 5-FU alone, and that it is well tolerated. However, the advantage is not reflected in overall survival.     

Malignant astrocytoma: hyperfractionated and standard radiotherapy with chemotherapy in a randomized prospective clinical trial

A prospective randomized trial of 157 patients with malignant astrocytoma (Grade III or IV) was carried out at a single institution. The minimization technique ensured balanced distribution of prognostic factors between the treatment groups. All received oral lomustine (CCNU, 80 mg/m2) six weekly and hydroxyurea (HU, 3.5 gm/m2 over 5 days) three weekly, for one year or until recurrence, with doses adjusted for myelosuppression. Patients were randomized to daily (5000 rad in 25 fractions (fr) in 5 weeks) or Q3h (every 3 hours) Cobalt 60 irradiation (3600-4000 rad in 36-40 fr of 100 rad each, given 4 fr per day at 3-hour intervals over two weeks) Steroid therapy (up to 16 mg day dexamethasone) was permitted. Complications were moderate and equivalent in the two groups. No significant survival or toxicity differences were seen between the two groups. Age, initial performance status, and extent of surgical resection were found to be significant (P less than 0.01) prognostic factors for survival. Median survival of the whole group was 48 weeks with a minimum follow-up of one year. There was no advantage to large radiation fields. The hyperfractionation and daily regimens had similar efficacy and toxicity. Hyperfractionation with chemotherapy offers a useful alternative approach in the management of this disease.     

A randomized trial of two regimens of cyclophosphamide,methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil,and prednisone in advanced breast cancer

Summary One-hundred evaluable patients with progressive advanced breast carcinoma untreated by cytotoxic chemotherapy but resistant to hormone therapy and irradiation were randomly allocated to receive either a combination of cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m²), methotrexate (40 mg/m²), 5-fluorouracil (600 mg/m²) IV every 3 weeks and prednisone 20 mg/m² PO daily, with diminishing doses (intermittent group), or a combination of cyclophosphamide (100 mg/m² PO on days 1–15, alternating with a 15-day rest period), methotrexate 20 mg/m² IV, 5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m² IV weekly for 20 weeks and prednisone 20 mg/m² PO daily, with diminishing doses in the remission induction period, followed by a maintenance regimen of cyclophosphamide 100 mg/m² PO on days 1–15, methotrexate 20 mg/m² IV on days 1, 8, and 15, 5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m² IV on days 1, 8, and 15, and prednisone 20 mg/m² PO on days 1–15, with a 3-week rest period between the courses (intensive group). Entry was from 1 December 1982 to 30 November 1983. Objective responses were seen in 20/49 (41%) patients in the intermittent group and 34/51 (67%) in the intensive group (²=6.72; P<0.01). The estimated median duration of response was 11 months in the intermittent group and 14 months in the intensive group. The estimated median survival was greater in the intensive group, but the difference was not statistically significant, although this parameter can be influenced with alternative additional chemotherapy. Toxicity was similar in both groups. These data suggest there are no therapeutic and survival advantages to the 3-weekly IV protocol compared with our previous regimen CMFP.     

Adjuvant portal liver infusion in colorectal cancer with 5-fluorouracil/heparin versus urokinase versus control. Results of a prospective randomized clinical trial (colorectal adenocarcinoma trial I)

This prospectively randomized clinical trial was carried out in four Dutch hospitals to reduce the development of metachronous liver metastases and to get a better survival in patients with colorectal malignancies after surgically radical en bloc resection of the primary tumor and the regional lymph nodes. Three hundred seventeen patients were randomized to participate in three trial arms. One group of patients was treated by surgery alone (control group); in the other patients a catheter was placed in the dilated umbilical vein and advanced until the tip was lying in the left branch of the portal vein. Fifty percent of these patients got immediate postoperative portal infusion with 1 g 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and 5000 U heparin daily for 7 days; the others received portal vein infusion with urokinase 10.000 U/hour for 24 hours only. Three hundred four patients were eligible. Overall hospital mortality was 3.6% (11 patients) and was not influenced by adjuvant treatment. After a median follow-up of 44 months 66 patients have died with relapse and 21 as a result of other causes. The chance of developing liver metastases and other distant metastases after portal infusion with 5-FU/heparin was one third of the chance in the control group (P less than 0.001). Only an insignificant reduction of the average death rate in the 5-FU/heparin group was found. In the urokinase group no significant effect in reducing metastases or in survival was noted. Before recommending cytotoxic portal infusion as an adjuvant treatment in patients with colorectal cancer, detailed analysis of other ongoing portal infusion studies has to be awaited and careful calculations have to be made regarding how many patients really can be saved by this treatment.