Notes on “Possibilistic programming approach for fuzzy multidimensional analysis of preference in group decision making”

The aim of this note is to point out and correct some errors in the definitions, notations operations and possibilistic programming model introduced by Sadi-Nezhad and Akhtari (2008) and hereby develop two correct possibilistic programming models for fuzzy multidimensional analysis of preference in the fuzzy multiattribute group decision making problems with both the fuzzy weight vector and the fuzzy positive ideal solution (PIS) unknown a priori.     

Possibilistic programming approach for fuzzy multidimensional analysis of preference in group decision making

Multiple attribute decision making (MADM) problems are the most encountered problems in decision making. Fuzziness is inherent in decision making process and linguistic variables are well suited to assessing an alternative on qualitative attributes using fuzzy rating. A few techniques in MADM assess the weights of attributes based on preference information on alternatives. But they are not practical any more when the set of all paired comparison judgments from decision makers (DMs) on attributes are not crisp and also we have to deal with fuzzy decision matrix. This paper investigates the generation of a possibilistic model for multidimensional analysis of preference (LINMAP). The model assesses the fuzzy weights as well as locating the ideal solution with fuzzy decision making preference on attributes and fuzzy decision matrix. All of the information is assumed as triangular fuzzy numbers (TFNs). This method is developed in group decision making environments and formulates the problem as a possibilistic programming with multiple objectives.     

Linear programming method for multiattribute group decision making using IF sets

The purpose of this paper is to develop a linear programming methodology for solving multiattribute group decision making problems using intuitionistic fuzzy (IF) sets. In this methodology, IF sets are constructed to capture fuzziness in decision information and decision making process. The group consistency and inconsistency indices are defined on the basis of pairwise comparison preference relations on alternatives given by the decision makers. An IF positive ideal solution (IFPIS) and weights which are unknown a priori are estimated using a new auxiliary linear programming model, which minimizes the group inconsistency index under some constraints. The distances of alternatives from the IFPIS are calculated to determine their ranking order. Moreover, some properties of the auxiliary linear programming model and other generalizations or specializations are discussed in detail. Validity and applicability of the proposed methodology are illustrated with the extended air-fighter selection problem and the doctoral student selection problem.     

A new soft computing model based on linear assignment and linear programming technique for multidimensional analysis of preference with interval type-2 fuzzy sets

Multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) approach plays an important role in life, since it is always necessary to make decisions through various alternatives based on specific criteria. In this paper, interval type-2 fuzzy sets (IT2FSs) are used because in most cases in the real-world the information is incomplete and ambiguous. A new group decision approach with linear assignment method (LAM) is proposed. In addition, weight of each evaluation factor according to subjective and objective data is constructed based on a new developed version of linear programming technique for multidimensional analysis of preference (LINMAP) method. In the proposed method, weights of decision makers (DMs) are computed based on a novel approach that applies a new modified method based on the concept of ideal solutions. Furthermore, a new IT2F-ranking method is introduced. To display the applicability of the presented soft computing method, firstly, a real case study of green supplier selection problem is adopted from the literature and solved. Moreover, the method is applied in a second case study of project evaluation and selection problem. Two applications show that the introduced method presents a proper soft computing framework that can handle real-world uncertain environments. Moreover, the method can consider importance of the DMs and evaluation criteria.     

Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy mathematical programming method for hybrid multi-criteria group decision making with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy truth degrees

As an important component of group decision making, the hybrid multi-criteria group decision making (MCGDM) is very complex and interesting in real applications. The purpose of this paper is to develop a novel interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy (IVIF) mathematical programming method for hybrid MCGDM considering alternative comparisons with hesitancy degrees. The subjective preference relations between alternatives given by each decision maker (DM) are formulated as an IVIF set (IVIFS). The IVIFSs, intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IFSs), trapezoidal fuzzy numbers (TrFNs), linguistic variables, intervals and real numbers are used to represent the multiple types of criteria values. The information of criteria weights is incomplete. The IVIFS-type consistency and inconsistency indices are defined through considering the fuzzy positive and negative ideal solutions simultaneously. To determine the criteria weights, we construct a novel bi-objective IVIF mathematical programming of minimizing the inconsistency index and meanwhile maximizing the consistency index, which is solved by the technically developed linear goal programming approach. The individual ranking order of alternatives furnished by each DM is subsequently obtained according to the comprehensive relative closeness degrees of alternatives to the fuzzy positive ideal solution. The collective ranking order of alternatives is derived through establishing a new multi-objective assignment model. A real example of critical infrastructure evaluation is provided to demonstrate the applicability and effectiveness of this method.     

TOPSIS with belief structure for group belief multiple criteria decision making

The technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution(TOPSIS)is one of the major techniques in dealing with multiple criteria decision making(MCDM)problems, and the belief structure(BS)model has been used successfully for uncertain MCDM with incompleteness, impreciseness or ignorance. In this paper, the TOPSIS method with BS model is proposed to solve group belief MCDM problems. Firstly, the group belief MCDM problem is structured as a belief decision matrix in which the judgments of each decision maker are described as BS models, and then the evidential reasoning approach is used for aggregating the multiple decision makers' judgments. Subsequently, the positive and negative ideal belief solutions are defined with the principle of TOPSIS. To measure the separation from ideal solutions, the concept and algorithm of belief distance measure are defined, which can be used for comparing the difference between BS models. Finally, the relative closeness and ranking index are calculated for ranking the alternatives. A numerical example is given to illustrate the proposed method.     

Interval programming method for hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute group decision making with incomplete preference over alternatives

The aim of this study is to employ the main structure of LINMAP (LINear programming technique for Multidimensional Analysis of Preference) to propose an interval programming method for solving multi-attribute group decision making (MAGDM) problems in which the ratings of alternatives are taken as hesitant fuzzy elements (HFEs) and all pair-wise comparison judgments over alternatives are represented by interval numbers. The contribution of this study is fivefold: (1) we define the new consistency and inconsistency indices; (2) we construct an interval programming model to determine the hesitant fuzzy positive ideal solution and the optimal weights of attributes, and at the same time present a decision algorithm; (3) we discuss several special cases of the proposed model in detail; (4) we show that compared with intuitionistic fuzzy LINMAP method (Li et al., 2010), the proposed approach reveals more useful information including the interval preference information, and does not need to transform HFEs into intuitionistic fuzzy numbers but directly deals with MAGDM problems and thus obtains better final decision results; and (5) we demonstrate the applicability and implementation process of the proposed approach by using an energy project selection example.     

An automatic approach to reaching consensus in multiple attribute group decision making

In this work, we consider the problem of consensus of multiple attribute group decision making, and develop an automatic approach to reaching consensus among group opinions. In the process of group decision making, each expert provides his/her preferences over the alternatives with respect to each attribute, and constructs an individual decision matrix. The developed approach first aggregates these individual decision matrices into a group decision matrix by using the additive weighted aggregation (AWA) operator, and then establishes a convergent iterative algorithm to gain a consentaneous group decision matrix. Then based on the consentaneous group decision matrix, the approach utilizes the AWA operator to derive the overall attribute values of alternatives, by which the most desirable alternative can be found out. Finally, we detailedly expound the implementation process of the approach with a practical example.     

Fuzzy linear programming approach to multiattribute decision making with multiple types of attribute values and incomplete weight information

In the classical Linear Programming Technique for Multidimensional Analysis of Preference (LINMAP), the decision maker (DM) gives the pair-wise comparisons of alternatives with crisp truth degree 0 or 1. However, in the real world, DM is not sure enough in all comparisons and can express his/her opinion with some fuzzy truth degree. Thus, DM's preferences are given through pair-wise comparisons of alternatives with fuzzy truth degrees, which may be represented as trapezoidal fuzzy numbers (TrFNs). Considered such fuzzy truth degrees, the aim of this paper is to develop a new fuzzy linear programming technique for solving multiattribute decision making (MADM) problems with multiple types of attribute values and incomplete weight information. In this method, TrFNs, real numbers, and intervals are used to represent the multiple types of decision information. The fuzzy consistency and inconsistency indices are defined as TrFNs due to the alternatives’ comparisons with fuzzy truth degrees. Hereby a new fuzzy linear programming model is constructed and solved by the possibility linear programming method with TrFNs developed in this paper. The fuzzy ideal solution (IS) and the attribute weights are then obtained. The distances of alternatives from the fuzzy IS can be calculated to determine their ranking order. The implementation process of the method proposed in this paper is illustrated with a strategy partner selection example. The comparison analyzes show that the method proposed in this paper generalizes the classical LINMAP, fuzzy LINMAP and possibility LINMAP.     

An interactive method for fuzzy multiple attribute group decision making

In this paper, we develop an interactive method for multiple attribute group decision making under fuzzy environment. The method can be used in situations where the information about attribute weights is partly known, the weights of decision makers are expressed in exact numerical values or triangular fuzzy numbers, and the attribute values are triangular fuzzy numbers. The method transforms fuzzy decision matrices into their expected decision matrices, constructs the corresponding normalized expected decision matrices by two simple formulas, and then aggregates these normalized expected decision matrices into a complex decision matrix. Moreover, the decision makers are asked to provide their preferences gradually in the course of interactions. By solving linear programming models, the method diminishes the given alternative set gradually, and finally finds the most preferred alternative. By using the method, the decision makers can provide and modify their preference information gradually in the process of decision making so as to make the decision result more reasonable. The method can not only reflect the importance of the given arguments and the ordered positions of the arguments, but also relieve the influence of unfair arguments on the decision result. Finally, a practical problem is used to illustrate the developed method.     

An approach to multiattribute decision making with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy assessments and incomplete weights

This article proposes an approach to multiattribute decision making with incomplete attribute weight information where individual assessments are provided as interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy numbers (IVIFNs). By employing a series of optimization models, the proposed approach derives a linear program for determining attribute weights. The weights are subsequently used to synthesize individual IVIFN assessments into an aggregated IVIFN value for each alternative. In order to rank alternatives based on their aggregated IVIFN values, a novel method is developed for comparing two IVIFNs by introducing two new functions: the membership uncertainty index and the hesitation uncertainty index. An illustrative investment decision problem is employed to demonstrate how to apply the proposed procedure and comparative studies are conducted to show its overall consistency with existing approaches.     

Extension of TOPSIS to determine weight of decision maker for group decision making problems with uncertain information

In traditional TOPSIS method, the ideal solutions for alternatives are expressed in vectors. An important step in the process of group decision making is to determine the relative importance of each decision maker. In this paper, the weights of decision makers derived from individual decision are determined by using an extended TOPSIS method with interval numbers. The ideal decisions for all individual decisions are expressed in matrices. The positive ideal decision is the intersection of all individual decisions; the negative ideal decision is the union of all individual decisions. Comparisons with other methods are also made. A numerical example is examined to show the potential applications of the proposed method.     

A multiple attributes decision making method using individual and collaborative attribute data in a fuzzy environment

Although multiple attribute decision making (MADM) problems with both individual attribute data of a single alternative and collaborative attribute data of pairwise alternatives exist in the real world, they have seldom been a focus of research. This paper proposes a MADM method using individual and collaborative attribute data in a fuzzy environment, in which experts use linguistic variables to express their opinions. In the method, first, the evaluation matrix of individual attributes date and the judgment matrix of collaborative attributes data are constructed. Then, the central dominance of one alternative outranking other all alternatives is defined for aggregating the collaborative data. From this, an integrated decision matrix incorporating individual and collaborative attribute data is constructed. Further, based on an extended TOPSIS, the fuzzy positive-ideal solution (FPIS) and the fuzzy negative-ideal solution (FNIS) are determined, and the relative closeness of each alternative to the FPIS and FNIS is calculated to determine the ranking order of all alternatives. Finally, two examples are used to illustrate the applicability of the proposed method.     

Induced generalized intuitionistic fuzzy OWA operator for multi-attribute group decision making

With respect to multi-attribute group decision making (MAGDM) problems in which both the attribute weights and the decision makers (DMs) weights take the form of real numbers, attribute values provided by the DMs take the form of intuitionistic fuzzy numbers, a new group decision making method is developed. Some operational laws, score function and accuracy function of intuitionistic fuzzy numbers are introduced at first. Then a new aggregation operator called induced generalized intuitionistic fuzzy ordered weighted averaging (IG-IFOWA) operator is proposed, which extend the induced generalized ordered weighted averaging (IGOWA) operator introduced by Merigo and Gil-Lafuente [Merigo, J. M., & Gil-Lafuente, A. M. (2009). The induced generalized OWA operator. Information Sciences, 179, 729-741] to accommodate the environment in which the given arguments are intuitionistic fuzzy sets that are characterized by a membership function and a non-membership function. Some desirable properties of the IG-IFOWA operator are studied, such as commutativity, idempotency, monotonicity and boundary. And then, an approach based on the IG-IFOWA and IFWA (intuitionistic fuzzy weighted averaging) operators is developed to solve MAGDM problems with intuitionistic fuzzy information. Finally, a numerical example is used to illustrate the developed approach.     

Some induced correlated aggregating operators with intuitionistic fuzzy information and their application to multiple attribute group decision making

In this paper, some multiple attribute group decision making (MAGDM) problems in which both the attribute weights and the expert weights are usually correlative, attribute values take the form of intuitionistic fuzzy values or interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy values, are investigated. Firstly, some operational law, score function and accuracy function of intuitionistic fuzzy values or interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy values are introduced. Then two new aggregation operators: induced intuitionistic fuzzy correlated averaging (I-IFCA) operator and induced intuitionistic fuzzy correlated geometric (I-IFCG) operator are developed and some desirable properties of the I-IFCA and I-IFCG operators are studied, such as commutativity, idempotency and monotonicity. An I-IFCA and IFCA (intuitionistic fuzzy correlated averaging) operators-based approach is developed to solve the MAGDM problems in which both the attribute weights and the expert weights usually correlative, attribute values take the form of intuitionistic fuzzy values. Then, we extend the developed models and procedures to the interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Finally, some illustrative examples are given to verify the developed approach and to demonstrate its practicality and effectiveness.     

A new approach for multiple attribute group decision making with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information

This paper proposes a novel method for multiple attribute group decision making (MAGDM) with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information. The interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy numbers of each expert preference matrix are first mapped into two dimensions. Thus, the values of each membership degree and non-membership degree are considered as points in the two-dimensional representation. Moreover, the distance between the points represents the variance among the different experts preferences. The preference points of the same character are considered as a point set. We employ the plant growth simulation algorithm (PGSA) to calculate the optimal rally points of every point set, the sum of whose Euclidean distances to other given points is minimal, and these optimal rally points reflect the preferences of the entire expert group. These points are used to establish an expert preference aggregation matrix. Suitable points from the matrix are chosen to constitute an ideal point matrix, a projection method is employed to calculate the sum of its Euclidean distance to the expert preference aggregation matrix, and the score of each alternative is evaluated. Finally, the overall ranking of alternatives is obtained. In addition, this study develops a process to evaluate the pros and cons of different aggregation methods. Two typical examples are presented to illustrate the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed approach.     

Some q-rung interval-valued orthopair fuzzy Maclaurin symmetric mean operators and their applications to multiple attribute group decision making

In this paper, according to the Maclaurin symmetric mean (MSM) operator, the dual MSM (DMSM) operator and the q-rung interval-valued orthopair fuzzy set (q-RIVOFS), we develop some novel MSM operators under the q-rung interval-valued orthopair fuzzy environment, such as, the q-rung interval-valued orthopair fuzzy MSM operator, the q-rung interval-valued orthopair fuzzy weighted MSM (q-RIVOFWMSM) operator, the q-rung interval-valued orthopair fuzzy DMSM operator, and the q-rung interval-valued orthopair fuzzy weighted DMSM operator. In addition, some precious properties and numerical examples of these new operators are given in detail. These new operators have the advantages of considering the interrelationship of arguments and can deal with multiple attribute group decision-making problems with q-rung interval-valued orthopair fuzzy information. Finally, a reality example for green suppliers selection in green supply chain management is provided to demonstrate the proposed approach and to verify its rationality and scientific.     

A novel group decision making method with intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations for RFID technology selection

A more scientific decision making process for radio frequency identification (RFID) technology selection is important to increase success rate of RFID technology application. RFID technology selection can be formulated as a kind of group decision making (GDM) problem with intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations (IFPRs). This paper develops a novel method for solving such problems. First, A technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) based method is presented to rank intuitionistic fuzzy values (IFVs). To achieve higher group consensus as well as possible, we construct an intuitionistic fuzzy linear programming model to derive experts’ weights. Depending on the construction of membership and non-membership functions, the constructed intuitionistic fuzzy linear programming model is solved by three kinds of approaches: optimistic approach, pessimistic approach and mixed approach. Then to derive the ranking order of alternatives from the collective IFPR, we extend quantifier guided non-dominance degree (QGNDD) and quantifier guided dominance degree (QGDD) to intuitionistic fuzzy environment. A new two-phase ranking approach is designed to generate the ordering of alternatives based on QGNDD and QGDD. Thereby, the corresponding method is proposed for the GDM problems with IFPRs. Some generalizations on the constructed intuitionistic fuzzy linear programming model are further discussed. At length, the validity of the proposed method is illustrated with a real-world RFID technology selection example.     

The inclusion-based TOPSIS method with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets for multiple criteria group decision making

The technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) method is a well-known compromising method for multiple criteria decision analysis. This paper develops an extended TOPSIS method with an inclusion comparison approach for addressing multiple criteria group decision-making problems in the framework of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Considering the relative agreement degrees and the importance weights of multiple decision makers, this paper presents a modified hybrid averaging method with an inclusion-based ordered weighted averaging operation for forming a collective decision environment. Based on the main structure of the TOPSIS method, this paper utilizes the concept of inclusion comparison possibilities to propose a new index for an inclusion-based closeness coefficient for ranking the alternatives. Additionally, two optimization models are established to determine the criterion weights for addressing situations in which the preference information is completely unknown or incompletely known. Finally, the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed methods are illustrated by a medical group decision-making problem.     

Double parameters TOPSIS for multi-attribute linguistic group decision making based on the intuitionistic Z-linguistic variables

Multi-attribute linguistic group decision making (MALGDM) is one of the most widespread and important human activities. Therefore, it is extremely significant to study the efficient methods to address linguistic information. Extended by classical fuzzy number, Z-number can describe both restraints and reliability, which has more capacity to represent human knowledge. In this paper, we will propose the intuitionistic Z-linguistic set (IZLS) combined the intuitionistic uncertain linguistic set (IULS) with Z-number. We further introduce the operational rules, new score and accuracy functions of it. Then, the Minkowski distance between two intuitionistic Z-linguistic variables is proposed with the attribute’s weight obtained by the priority relationship among different categories. Finally, we propose an extended TOPSIS method with double parameters which consider both preference of alternatives and optimism of decision makers (DMs). Case study on investment strategy and medical diagnosis are presented to show the applicability of the proposed approach and some comparisons are conducted to illustrate its superiorities.