Phase I trial of OTS11101, an anti‐angiogenic vaccine targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1 in solid tumor

OTS11101 is a novel peptide vaccine that acts as an angiogenesis inhibitor by inducing cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) cells that specifically target vascular endothelial cells expressing vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor 1. We conducted a phase I study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, maximum tolerated dose, and pharmacodynamic biomarker status of this vaccine. Nine patients with advanced solid tumors received 1.0, 2.0, or 3.0 mg of OTS11101 subcutaneously, once a week in a 28‐day cycle. Three patients experienced grade 1 injection site reactions, which were the most frequent adverse events. Grade 2 proteinuria and hypertension each occurred in one patient. As other toxicities were generally mild, the maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Furthermore, we explored the induction of specific activated CTLs, and biomarkers related to angiogenesis. A pharmacodynamics study revealed that induction of specific CTLs was observed for a dose of 2.0 and 3.0 mg. The serum concentrations of soluble VEGF receptor 1 and 2 after vaccination increased significantly compared with baseline. A microarray was performed to give a comprehensive analysis of gene expression, suggesting that OTS11101 vaccination resulted in T cell activation in a clinical setting. In conclusion, OTS11101 was well tolerated in patients up to 3.0 mg once weekly and our biomarker analysis suggested that this anti‐angiogenesis vaccine is biologically active. (Cancer Sci 2013; 104: 98–104)     

Phase I study of highly selective inhibitor of VEGFR tyrosine kinase,tivozanib, in Japanese patients with solid tumors

Tivozanib is a potent and selective inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinases. A previous clinical trial in the EU and USA indicated that tivozanib at the maximum tolerated dose of 1.5 mg/day showed an antitumor activity in patients with renal cell carcinoma. This Japanese phase I study was designed to determine the recommended phase II dose of tivozanib for Japanese patients; secondary objectives included pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profiles and preliminary efficacy. Daily treatment with tivozanib in a 3‐weeks‐on/1‐week‐off cycle was examined in nine Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors in the 3 + 3 design (Level 1, 1.0 mg; Level 2, 1.5 mg). No dose‐limiting toxicity was observed throughout the study, and the maximum tolerated dose was not reached. The most commonly observed drug‐related adverse events were diarrhea, dysphonia, rash, thyroid stimulating hormone increase, and with severity grade ≥3, hand‐foot skin reaction, hypertension, and proteinuria. Those adverse events were generally well‐manageable and mostly resolved within the tolerability evaluation period. Serum exposure to tivozanib resulted in t_1/2 of more than >60 h. Increase of plasma VEGF and decrease of plasma VEGFR‐1 and VEGFR‐2 were observed 1–3 weeks after tivozanib treatment. Although no complete or partial response was observed, long‐term stable disease continuing more than 170 days was observed in three renal cell carcinoma patients who had failed prior VEGFR inhibitors. In conclusion, 1.5 mg/day of tivozanib in a 3‐weeks‐on/1‐week‐off setting was tolerable in Japanese patients, and was recommended for further clinical trials in the Japanese population. Clinical trial Registration No: JapicCTI‐090854.     

Phase I clinical trial of cell division associated 1 (CDCA1) peptide vaccination for castration resistant prostate cancer

Cell division associated 1 (CDCA1) was screened as an oncogene that is overexpressed on several cancers, including prostate cancer. A highly immunogenic HLA‐A*2402‐restricted epitope peptide corresponding to part of the CDCA1 protein was also identified. A phase I clinical trial was conducted for patients with castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) using a CDCA1 peptide vaccination. Twelve patients having HLA‐A*2402 with CRPC after failure of docetaxel chemotherapy were enrolled. They received subcutaneous administration of the CDCA1 peptide as an emulsion with Montanide ISA51VG once a week in a dose‐escalation manner (doses of 1.0 or 3.0 mg/body, six patients received each dose). The primary endpoint was safety, and the secondary endpoints were the immunological and clinical responses. Vaccination with CDCA1 peptide was well tolerated without any serious adverse events. Peptide‐specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) responses using ELISPOT assay and dextramer assay were observed in three patients receiving the 1.0 mg dose and five patients receiving the 3.0 mg dose. The median overall survival time was 11.0 months and specific CTL reacting to CDCA1 peptide were recognized in long‐surviving patients. CDCA1‐derived peptide vaccine treatment was tolerable and might effectively induce peptide‐specific CTLs for CRPC patients. This novel peptide vaccine therapy for CRPC appears promising. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01225471).     

Randomized phase II/III clinical trial of elpamotide for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: PEGASUS‐PC Study

Gemcitabine is a key drug for the treatment of pancreatic cancer; however, with its limitation in clinical benefits, the development of another potent therapeutic is necessary. Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 is an essential target for tumor angiogenesis, and we have conducted a phase I clinical trial using gemcitabine and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 peptide (elpamotide). Based on the promising results of this phase I trial, a multicenter, randomized, placebo‐controlled, double‐blind phase II/III clinical trial has been carried out for pancreatic cancer. The eligibility criteria included locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. Patients were assigned to either the Active group (elpamotide + gemcitabine) or Placebo group (placebo + gemcitabine) in a 2:1 ratio by the dynamic allocation method. The primary endpoint was overall survival. The Harrington–Fleming test was applied to the statistical analysis in this study to evaluate the time‐lagged effect of immunotherapy appropriately. A total of 153 patients (Active group, n = 100; Placebo group, n = 53) were included in the analysis. No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups in the prolongation of overall survival (Harrington–Fleming P‐value, 0.918; log–rank P‐value, 0.897; hazard ratio, 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.486–1.557). Median survival time was 8.36 months (95% CI, 7.46–10.18) for the Active group and 8.54 months (95% CI, 7.33–10.84) for the Placebo group. The toxicity observed in both groups was manageable. Combination therapy of elpamotide with gemcitabine was well tolerated. Despite the lack of benefit in overall survival, subgroup analysis suggested that the patients who experienced severe injection site reaction, such as ulceration and erosion, might have better survival.     

Effect of axitinib (AG‐013736) on fatigue,thyroid‐stimulating hormone,and biomarkers: A phase I study in Japanese patients

Axitinib is an oral, potent, and selective inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) 1, 2, and 3. This phase I study evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, antitumor activity, and recommended starting dose of axitinib in patients with advanced solid tumors. Twelve patients received single‐dose axitinib 5 mg and were monitored for ≥48 h. Continuous 5 mg twice‐daily dosing was then initiated. One patient had dose‐limiting toxicity (grade 3 proteinuria and fatigue). Common treatment‐related adverse events were anorexia, fatigue, and diarrhea. Grade 3 treatment‐related adverse events were fatigue and hypertension. Maximum axitinib plasma concentration occurred 1–4 h after steady‐state dosing. Eleven patients experienced thyroid‐stimulating hormone elevation; time‐course change and fatigue onset appeared to be related in some patients. Significant correlation was observed between thyroid‐stimulating hormone change and area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC; r = 0.80, P = 0.005). Axitinib decreased plasma soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (s‐VEGFR2), with significant correlation between change in s‐VEGFR2 and AUC (r = ?0.92, P < 0.0001). Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography revealed a substantial decrease in tumor metabolic activity associated with axitinib. Tumor size decreased in nine patients. The time‐course of thyroid‐stimulating hormone change appeared correlated with fatigue. There were significant correlations between thyroid‐stimulating hormone or s‐VEGFR2 and axitinib exposure. Axitinib 5 mg twice‐daily is the recommended starting dose for Japanese patients. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT00447005. (Cancer Sci 2010) (Cancer Sci 2010; 101: 963–968)     

Overall survival and final efficacy and safety results from a Japanese phase II study of axitinib in cytokine‐refractory metastatic renal cell carcinoma

In an open‐label, multicenter phase II study of Japanese patients with cytokine‐refractory metastatic renal cell carcinoma, axitinib showed substantial antitumor activity with an acceptable safety profile. Here, we report overall survival and updated efficacy and safety results. Sixty‐four Japanese patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma following prior therapy with cytokines were treated with axitinib at a starting dose of 5 mg b.i.d. Following median treatment duration of 14.2 months, median overall survival was 37.3 months (95% CI, 28.6–49.9). The objective response rate, the primary endpoint of the study, was 51.6% (95% CI, 38.7–64.2); the median duration of response, 11.1 months (95% CI, 8.2–13.7); and the median progression‐free survival was 11.0 months (95% CI, 9.2–12.0), assessed by the independent review committee. Common treatment‐related all‐grade adverse events were hypertension (88%), hand‐foot syndrome (75%), diarrhea (66%), proteinuria (63%), fatigue (55%) and dysphonia (53%). In an exploratory analysis, median overall survival was found to be significantly longer in patients who had greater decreases in plasma levels of soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor‐2 during the first cycle of treatment. In conclusion, the present study showed axitinib to be effective, and toxicities with long‐term treatment were generally controllable with axitinib dose modification and/or standard medications in these Japanese patients. Some frequently reported adverse events warrant close monitoring and management. Changes in the plasma levels of soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor‐2 may be used as a prognostic factor for overall survival in metastatic renal cell carcinoma following axitinib treatment. This study is registered at ClinicalTrial.gov (identifier NCT00569946).     

Phase I/IIa study evaluating the safety,efficacy, pharmacokinetics,and pharmacodynamics of lucitanib in advanced solid tumors

BackgroundLucitanib is a potent, oral inhibitor fibroblast growth factor receptor types 1 and 2 (FGFR), vascular endothelial growth factor receptor types 1, 2, and 3 (VEGFR), platelet-derived growth factor receptor types α and β (PGFRα/β), which are essential kinases for tumor growth, survival, migration, and angiogenesis. Several tumor types, including breast carcinoma, demonstrate amplification of fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-related genes. There are no approved drugs for molecularly defined FGF-aberrant (FGFR1- or FGF3/4/19-amplified) tumors.MethodsThis open-label phase I/IIa study involved a dose-escalation phase to determine maximum tolerated dose (MTD), recommended dose (RD), and pharmacokinetics of lucitanib in patients with advanced solid tumors, followed by a dose-expansion phase to obtain preliminary evidence of efficacy in patients who could potentially benefit from treatment (i.e. with tumors harboring FGF-aberrant pathway or considered angiogenesis-sensitive).ResultsDoses from 5 to 30 mg were evaluated with dose-limiting toxic effects dominated by vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibition-related toxic effects at the 30 mg dose level (one case of grade 4 depressed level of consciousness and two cases of grade 3 thrombotic microangiopathy). The most common adverse events (all grades, all cohorts) were hypertension (91%), asthenia (42%), and proteinuria (57%). Exposure increased with dose and t_½ was 31–40 h, suitable for once daily administration. Seventy-six patients were included. All but one had stage IV; 42% had >3 lines of previous chemotherapy. Sixty-four patients were assessable for response; 58 had measurable disease. Clinical activity was observed at all doses tested with durable Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) partial responses in a variety of tumor types. In the angiogenesis-sensitive group, objective RECIST response rate (complete response + partial response) was 26% (7 of 27) and progression-free survival (PFS) was 25 weeks. In assessable FGF-aberrant breast cancer patients, 50% (6 of 12) achieved RECIST partial response with a median PFS of 40.4 weeks for all treated patients.ConclusionLucitanib has promising efficacy and a manageable side-effect profile. The spectrum of activity observed demonstrates clinical benefit in both FGF-aberrant and angiogenesis-sensitive populations. A comprehensive phase II program is planned.     

Phase 1/2 study of the WT1 peptide cancer vaccine WT4869 in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome

WT4869 is a synthetic peptide vaccine derived from the Wilms’ tumor gene 1 (WT1) protein. This phase 1/2 open‐label study evaluated the safety and efficacy of WT4869, and biomarkers for response, in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome. WT4869 (5–1200 μg/dose) was administered intradermally every 2 weeks, according to a 3 + 3 dose‐escalation method in higher‐risk (International Prognostic Scoring System score ≥1.5) or lower‐risk (score <1.5) red blood cell transfusion‐dependent patients with myelodysplastic syndrome. Twenty‐six patients were enrolled and treated (median age, 75 years; range, 32 to 89). The most common adverse event was injection site reaction (61.5%). Main grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (30.8%), febrile neutropenia, pneumonia, elevated blood creatine phosphokinase levels and hypoalbuminemia (all 7.7%). Dose‐limiting toxicities occurred in 1 patient in the 50 μg/dose cohort (pyrexia, muscle hemorrhage and hypoalbuminemia) and 1 patient in the 400 μg/dose cohort (pneumonitis); however, the maximum tolerated dose could not be determined from this trial. The overall response rate was 18.2%, the disease control rate was 59.1% and median overall survival was 64.71 weeks (95% confidence interval: 50.29, 142.86) as assessed by the Kaplan–Meier method. Subgroup analysis of azacitidine‐refractory patients with higher‐risk myelodysplastic syndrome (11 patients) showed median overall survival of 55.71 weeks (approximately 13 months). WT1‐specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte induction was observed in 11 of 25 evaluable patients. WT4869 was well tolerated in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome and preliminary data suggest that WT4869 is efficacious. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.jp as JapicCTI‐101374.     

Phase I study of AEE788, a novel multitarget inhibitor of ErbB- and VEGF-receptor-family tyrosine kinases, in recurrent glioblastoma patients

Purpose

Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) play a significant role in glioblastoma angiogenesis and proliferation, making tyrosine kinase (TK) receptors logical targets for treatment. We evaluated AEE788, a reversible TK inhibitor that inhibits EGFR and VEGFR, in recurrent glioblastoma patients.

Methods

In this dose-escalation, phase I study, patients with recurrent glioblastoma received AEE788 once daily in 28-day cycles in stratified subgroups: those receiving (1) non-enzyme-inducing anticonvulsants drugs or no anticonvulsants (Group A) and (2) enzyme-inducing anticonvulsant drugs (Group B). A dose-expansion phase stratified patients by surgical eligibility. Primary objectives were to determine dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose; secondary objectives included evaluating (1) safety/tolerability, (2) pharmacokinetics, and (3) preliminary antitumor activity.

Results

Sixty-four glioblastoma patients were enrolled. Two Group A patients experienced DLTs (proteinuria and stomatitis) at 550?mg; 550?mg was, therefore, the highest dose evaluated and dose limiting. One Group B patient receiving 800?mg experienced a DLT (diarrhea). The initially recommended dose for dose-expansion phase for Group A was 400?mg; additional patients received 250?mg to assess the hepatotoxicity. Most frequently reported adverse events (AEs) included diarrhea and rash. Serious AEs, most commonly grade 3/4 liver function test elevations, were responsible for treatment discontinuation in 17% of patients. AEE788 concentrations were reduced by EIACD. The best overall response was stable disease (17%).

Conclusions

Continuous, once-daily AEE788 was associated with unacceptable toxicity and minimal activity for the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma. The study was, therefore, discontinued prematurely.     

Phase I study of cetuximab, erlotinib, and bevacizumab in patients with advanced solid tumors

Background  Complex interrelationships exist between the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor pathways. EGFR activation elicits cell proliferation and increased VEGF expression. To maximally inhibit EGFR and then downstream VEGF activity, this phase I study was initiated to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of erlotinib with fixed-dose cetuximab, and then combine with bevacizumab in patients with advanced malignancies. Patients and methods  Patients with advanced malignancies likely to express EGFR were treated with a full dose of cetuximab intravenous weekly, combined with various doses of oral erlotinib daily (Part 1). Once the MTD was determined in Part 1, escalating doses of bevacizumab were administered intravenously biweekly (Part 2). Results  Forty patients were enrolled and received 155 courses over four dose levels. In Part 1, dose-limiting grade 3 rash occurred in two patients administered with erlotinib at 100 mg daily, and the MTD of erlotinib for this combination was 50 mg daily with standard-dose cetuximab (11 patients treated). Other adverse events included rash, diarrhea, fatigue, and hypomagnesemia. In Part 2, bevacizumab at 10 mg/kg intravenous every 2 weeks was safely added, with additional nondose-limiting headache, proteinuria, and hypertension. There was one partial response in a patient with renal cell carcinoma. Durable stable disease was observed in five patients for 6–11 months. Conclusions  The MTD for Part 1 was 50 mg daily of erlotinib combined with standard cetuximab. Bevacizumab at 10 mg/kg biweekly can be safely administered with the MTD for erlotinib and cetuximab combination. Presented in part at the 42nd Annual Meeting of American Society of Clinical Oncology, Atlanta, Georgia, June 2–6, 2006, and at the 18th EORTC-NCI-AACR Symposium on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics, Prague, Czech Republic, November 7–10, 2006. Chia-Chi Lin and Emiliano Calvo contributed equally to this study.     

Phase I study of a new cancer vaccine of ten mixed peptides for advanced cancer patients

A phase I study of a new cancer vaccine (KRM‐10), consisting of a mixture of 10 different short peptides, was conducted for patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancers. Primary or secondary endpoints included the dose‐limiting toxicity (DLT), or safety and immune responses, respectively. Peptide‐specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) and immunoglobulin G (IgG), together with soluble inflammatory factors, were measured before and after vaccination. Twenty‐one patients were vaccinated with KRM‐10 at dose levels of 10 (n = 6), 20 (n = 8) or 30 mg (n = 7) of peptides every week for 6 weeks. No DLT were observed in the dose range evaluated. Common treatment‐related adverse events were a grade 1 injection site reaction in 15 patients, and fever in three patients (grade 1 in two patients and grade 2 in one patient). CTL activity to at least one peptide at the time of the third and sixth vaccination increased in 2 and 3 of 6 (10 mg), 2 of 8 and 4 of 6 (20 mg), or 2 and 1 of 6 (30 mg) patients, respectively. IgG levels, at the third and sixth vaccination, were also increased in 1 and 1 of 6 (10 mg), 2 of 8 and 4 of 6 (20 mg), or 1 and 3 of 6 (30 mg) patients, respectively. The KRM‐10 vaccine consisting of 20 mg of peptides was determined as the optimal dose for a coming phase II trial because of its safety, and also for demonstrating the most potent activity for augmenting the immune response of the three doses tested. This trial was registered at the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry as UMIN000008820.     

Phase I clinical trial using peptide vaccine for human vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 in combination with gemcitabine for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer

Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2) is an essential factor in tumor angiogenesis and in the growth of pancreatic cancer. Immunotherapy using epitope peptide for VEGFR2 (VEGFR2‐169) that we identified previously is expected to improve the clinical outcome. Therefore, a phase I clinical trial combining of VEGFR2‐169 with gemcitabine was conducted for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Patients with metastatic and unresectable pancreatic cancer were eligible for the trial. Gemcitabine was administered at a dose of 1000 mg/m² on days 1, 8, and 15 in a 28‐day cycle. The VEGFR2‐169 peptide was subcutaneously injected weekly in a dose‐escalation manner (doses of 0.5, 1, and 2 mg/body, six patients/one cohort). Safety and immunological parameters were assessed. No severe adverse effect of grade 4 or higher was observed. Of the 18 patients who completed at least one course of the treatment, 15 (83%) developed immunological reactions at the injection sites. Specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) reacting to the VEGFR2‐169 peptide were induced in 11 (61%) of the 18 patients. The disease control rate was 67%, and the median overall survival time was 8.7 months. This combination therapy for pancreatic cancer patients was tolerable at all doses. Peptide‐specific CTL could be induced by the VEGFR2‐169 peptide vaccine at a high rate, even in combination with gemcitabine. From an immunological point of view, the optimal dose for further clinical trials might be 2 mg/body or higher. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrial.gov (no. NCT 00622622). (Cancer Sci 2009)     

Phase I Trial of Cediranib in Combination with Cisplatin and Pemetrexed in Chemonaive Patients with Unresectable Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (SWOG S0905)

IntroductionIn malignant pleural mesothelioma, targeting angiogenesis with cediranib, a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor and platelet-derived growth factor receptor inhibitor, may have therapeutic potential.MethodsS0905 phase I combined cediranib (two dose cohorts [30 mg and 20 mg daily]) with cisplatin-pemetrexed for six cycles followed by maintenance cediranib in unresectable chemonaive patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma of any histologic subtype. The primary end point established the maximum tolerated dose in combination with cisplatin-pemetrexed in a dose deescalation scheme.ResultsA total of 20 patients were enrolled (seven to the 30-mg cohort and 13 to the 20-mag cohort). In the cediranib 30-mg cohort, two of the initial six patients reported dose-limiting toxicities and the dose was deemed too toxic to continue. In the next cohort, two patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities, and thus, the maximum tolerated dose of cediranib was established as 20 mg. During the six cycles of cisplatin-pemetrexed-cediranib, 20 mg, there were grade 3 toxicities (neutropenia and gastrointestinal) and grade 4 thrombocytopenia. No patients had any significant episodes of bleeding. According to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (n = 17 evaluable patients), the median progression-free survival was 12.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.9–17.2); according to the Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (n = 19 evaluable patients), the median progression-free survival was 8.6 months (95% CI: 6.1–10.9). For all patients, the disease control rate at 6 weeks was 90% and median overall survival time was 16.2 months (95% CI: 10.5–28.7).ConclusionsCediranib combined with cisplatin-pemetrexed has a reasonable toxicity profile and preliminary promising efficacy. The phase II S0905 trial will evaluate the efficacy of the triplet regimen compared with the current standard of care, cisplatin-pemetrexed.     

Ribociclib,a CDK 4/6 inhibitor,plus endocrine therapy in Asian women with advanced breast cancer

The ongoing, Phase Ib MONALEESASIA study is evaluating the efficacy and safety of ribociclib plus endocrine therapy in Asian patients with hormone receptor‐positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2‐negative advanced breast cancer. Eligible patients from Japan, Hong Kong, and Singapore were enrolled in this 2‐phase study consisting of a dose‐escalation phase to determine the maximum‐tolerated dose and the recommended Phase II dose of ribociclib plus letrozole, and a dose‐expansion phase to evaluate safety and tolerability of ribociclib plus letrozole, fulvestrant, or tamoxifen. An exploratory biomarker analysis evaluating expression of target genes was also conducted. In the dose‐escalation phase, the maximum‐tolerated/recommended Phase II doses of ribociclib were lower in Japanese patients (300 mg) than in Asian non‐Japanese patients (600 mg). Ribociclib plus endocrine therapy at the recommended Phase II dose had a manageable safety profile, with neutropenia and elevated liver transaminases being the most common adverse events leading to dose modifications or discontinuations, and it demonstrated evidence of clinical activity in both Japanese and Asian non‐Japanese patients. Preliminary efficacy in Asian populations is similar to that observed in White populations studied in previous ribociclib (MONALEESA) trials. Biomarker analysis demonstrated suppression of pharmacodynamic biomarker gene expression, indicating inhibition of target genes by ribociclib combined with endocrine therapy. Results from the ongoing study support the use of ribociclib in combination with letrozole in Asian non‐Japanese patients at the same dose (600 mg) as White patients. In Japanese patients, a lower dose of ribociclib (300 mg) should be considered. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02333370.     

First-in-human study of ONO-4578, an antagonist of prostaglandin E2 receptor 4, alone and with nivolumab in solid tumors

EP4, a prostaglandin E₂ receptor, has shown an immunosuppressive activity on cancer cells. This first-in-human study evaluated ONO-4578, a highly selective EP4 antagonist, as monotherapy and in combination with nivolumab in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors. A daily dose ranging from 30 mg to 100 mg of ONO-4578 monotherapy and that ranging from 2 mg to 60 mg of ONO-4578 with biweekly nivolumab 240 mg were administered. A total of 31 patients were enrolled, 10 receiving monotherapy and 21 receiving combination therapy. Overall, 26 patients experienced treatment-related adverse events. Dose-limiting toxicities were observed in three patients; one of six patients receiving 100 mg monotherapy developed grade 3 duodenal ulcer and two of six patients receiving 60 mg combination therapy developed either grade 3 erythema multiforme or grade 3 increased amylase and grade 4 increased lipase. One patient with small-cell lung cancer who received 40 mg combination therapy had a partial response, and three patients with monotherapy and six patients with combination therapy had stable disease. Pharmacodynamics analyses showed that ONO-4578 had EP4 antagonistic activity at doses as low as 2 mg. In conclusion, the maximum tolerated dose of ONO-4578 alone or in combination with nivolumab was not reached. ONO-4578 was well tolerated at the tested doses and showed signs of antitumor activity. Considering safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics results, ONO-4578 40 mg daily with nivolumab 240 mg biweekly was selected as the recommended dose for future clinical trials. (Registration: JapicCTI-173,496 and NCT03155061).     

Phase I dose‐escalation trial of Sym004, an anti‐EGFR antibody mixture,in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors

Sym004 is a 1:1 mixture of two antibodies targeting non‐overlapping epitopes of the epidermal growth factor receptor that antagonizes ligand binding and induces receptor downregulation. In preclinical models, it has superior antitumor activity to cetuximab and panitumumab. Japanese adults aged ≥20 years with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status of 0/1 and life expectancy ≥3 months were eligible. Patients in Part A (dose escalation) had refractory or recurrent late‐stage solid tumors and received Sym004 6 mg/kg/wk (n = 3), 9 mg/kg loading/6 mg/kg/wk (n = 6), 12 mg/kg/wk (n = 6), or 18 mg/kg biweekly (n = 6). Patients in expansion Part B (n = 30) had esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and received Sym004 at the dose recommended from Part A. Fifty‐one patients received Sym004. No dose‐limiting toxicities were observed in Part A. A dose of 12 mg/kg/wk was selected for Part B. All patients in Part B experienced treatment‐related adverse events, most commonly dermatitis acneiform (76.7%). Eighteen grade ≥3 treatment‐related adverse events and five serious adverse events occurred (cardiac arrest, lung infection, interstitial lung disease, toxic skin eruption, blood creatinine increase). Two patients had treatment‐related adverse events resulting in death (cardiac arrest and blood creatinine increase). Five patients in Part B had a best overall response of partial response, 12 stable diseases and 12 disease progression (1 not evaluable). The objective response rate was 16.7% (95% CI: 5.6%‐34.7%). Sym004 therapy was well tolerated with no dose‐limiting toxicities at any dose studied. Evidence of antitumor activity was seen in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01955473.     

Preclinical characterization of anlotinib,a highly potent and selective vascular endothelial growth factor receptor‐2 inhibitor

Abrogating tumor angiogenesis by inhibiting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor‐2 (VEGFR2) has been established as a therapeutic strategy for treating cancer. However, because of their low selectivity, most small molecule inhibitors of VEGFR2 tyrosine kinase show unexpected adverse effects and limited anticancer efficacy. In the present study, we detailed the pharmacological properties of anlotinib, a highly potent and selective VEGFR2 inhibitor, in preclinical models. Anlotinib occupied the ATP‐binding pocket of VEGFR2 tyrosine kinase and showed high selectivity and inhibitory potency (IC₅₀ <1 nmol/L) for VEGFR2 relative to other tyrosine kinases. Concordant with this activity, anlotinib inhibited VEGF‐induced signaling and cell proliferation in HUVEC with picomolar IC₅₀ values. However, micromolar concentrations of anlotinib were required to inhibit tumor cell proliferation directly in vitro. Anlotinib significantly inhibited HUVEC migration and tube formation; it also inhibited microvessel growth from explants of rat aorta in vitro and decreased vascular density in tumor tissue in vivo. Compared with the well‐known tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib, once‐daily oral dose of anlotinib showed broader and stronger in vivo antitumor efficacy and, in some models, caused tumor regression in nude mice. Collectively, these results indicate that anlotinib is a well‐tolerated, orally active VEGFR2 inhibitor that targets angiogenesis in tumor growth, and support ongoing clinical evaluation of anlotinib for a variety of malignancies.     

Phase I dose‐escalation study of buparlisib (BKM120), an oral pan‐class I PI3K inhibitor,in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors

Buparlisib (BKM120) is an oral pan‐phosphatidylinositol 3‐kinase inhibitor, targeting all four isoforms of class I PI3K (α, β, γ and δ). This open‐label Phase I dose‐escalation study was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose of continuous daily buparlisib in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. Secondary objectives included safety and tolerability, pharmacokinetics, antitumor activity and pharmacodynamic marker changes. Fifteen patients were treated at 25 mg/day (n = 3), 50 mg/day (n = 3) and 100 mg/day (n = 9) dose levels. One dose‐limiting toxicity of Grade 4 abnormal liver function occurred at 100 mg/day. Considering the safety profile and the maximum tolerated dose in the first‐in‐man study of buparlisib in non‐Japanese patients, further dose escalation was stopped and 100 mg/day was declared the recommended dose. The most common treatment‐related adverse events were rash, abnormal hepatic function (including increased transaminase levels), increased blood insulin levels and increased eosinophil count. Hyperglycemia was experienced by two patients, one Grade 1 and one Grade 4, and mood alterations were experienced by three patients, two Grade 1 and one Grade 2. Pharmacokinetic results showed that buparlisib was rapidly absorbed in a dose‐proportional manner. Best overall response was stable disease for six patients, including one unconfirmed partial response. In these Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors, buparlisib had a manageable safety profile, with similar pharmacokinetics to non‐Japanese patients. The recommended dose of 100 mg/day will be used in future studies of buparlisib in Japanese patients.     

Phase I safety and pharmacokinetics of BAY 43-9006 administered for 21 days on/7 days off in patients with advanced, refractory solid tumours

BAY 43-9006 is a novel dual-action Raf kinase and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) inhibitor that targets tumour cell proliferation and tumour angiogenesis. This Phase I study was undertaken to determine the safety profile, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), pharmacokinetics, and tumour response profile of oral BAY 43-9006 in patients with advanced, refractory solid tumours. BAY 43-9006 was administered daily for repeated cycles of 21 days on/7 days off. A total of 44 patients were enrolled at doses from 50 to 800 mg b.i.d. Pharmacokinetic profiles of BAY 43-9006 in plasma were determined during the first treatment cycle. The most frequently reported adverse events over multiple cycles were gastrointestinal (75%), dermatologic (71%), constitutional (68%), pain (64%), or hepatic (61%) related. A MTD of 400 mg b.i.d. BAY 43-9006 was defined. BAY 43-9006 was absorbed rapidly; steady-state conditions were reached within 7 days. BAY 43-9006 exposure increased nonproportionally with increasing dose. In all, 32 patients were evaluated for tumour response: 15 patients showed tumour progression, 16 patients experienced stable disease (>6 months in eight patients), and one patient with renal cell carcinoma achieved a partial response. BAY 43-9006 given for 21 days with 7 days off treatment was safe, well tolerated, and showed antitumour activity.