Detection of Grouped and Ungrouped Parts in Visual Patterns by Tufted Capuchin Monkeys (Cebus apella) and Humans (Homo sapiens).

The authors investigated perceptual grouping in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) and humans (Homo sapiens). In Experiment 1, 6 monkeys received a visual pattern as the sample and had to identify the comparison stimulus featuring some of its parts. Performance was better for ungrouped parts than for grouped parts. In Experiment 2, the sample featured the parts, and the comparison stimuli, the complex figures: The advantage for ungrouped elements disappeared. In Experiment 3, in which new stimuli were introduced, the results of the previous experiments were replicated. In Experiment 4, 128 humans were presented with the same tasks and stimuli used with monkeys. Their accuracy was higher for grouped parts. Results suggest that human and nonhuman primates use different modes of analyzing multicomponent patterns. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Use of multiple-alternative matching-to-sample in the study of visual search in a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes).

Visual search in a chimpanzee and in humans were compared under the multiple-alternative matching-to-sample (MTS) procedure, in which a sample stimulus was followed by 1 positive (target) and several negative comparison stimuli (distractors). Reaction times (RTs) in the chimpanzee were affected by the number of distractors, the target–distractor similarity, and the uniformity of search display. Similar results were also obtained from humans and suggest that the performance by the chimpanzee may involve the same visual information-processing capabilities as those required in the human visual search performance. The multiple-alternative MTS is useful for studying various visual perceptual–cognitive abilities of animals including chimpanzees. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Human and chimpanzee face recognition in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): Role of exposure and impact on categorical perception.

The respective influences of exposure and inborn neural networks on conspecific and nonconspecific face processing remain unclear. Although the importance of exposure in the development of object and face recognition in general is well documented, studies explicitly comparing face recognition across species showed a species-specific effect. For instance, laboratory monkeys exposed daily to human faces were better at discriminating monkeys than humans, suggesting that the role of exposure may not be the only factor affecting cross-species recognition. In the present study, the authors investigated conspecific and nonconspecific face recognition in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) from 2 primate centers that provided different exposure to chimpanzee and human faces. The authors showed that the chimpanzees from the center providing more exposure to human faces than to chimpanzee faces were better at discriminating human faces than they were at discriminating chimpanzee faces. The chimpanzees from the other center did not show the same effect. A computational simulation was developed to evaluate the average similarities among human pictures and among chimpanzee pictures. Both categories were comparable. Chimpanzees' scores were significantly correlated with the similarity coefficients. Overall, the results show that exposure is a critical determinant in conspecific and nonconspecific face recognition. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Perception of the standard and the reversed Müller-Lyer figures in pigeons (Columba livia) and humans (Homo sapiens).

The authors compared perception of the standard and reversed Müller-Lyer figures between pigeons (Columbia livia) and humans (Homo sapiens). In Experiment 1, pigeons learned to classify 6 lengths of target lines into "long" and "short" categories by pecking 2 keys on the monitor, ignoring the 2 brackets so placed that they would not induce an illusion. In the test that followed, all 3 birds chose the "long" key more frequently for the standard Müller-Lyer figures with inward-pointing brackets (>). The subjects' responses were accountable by neither overall lengths of the figures nor horizontal gaps between the 2 brackets. For the reversed figures, effects of the brackets were absent. These results suggested that the pigeons perceived the standard Müller-Lyer illusion but not the reversed one. Experiment 2 confirmed that humans perceived both types of the illusion. Pigeons and humans may perceive the same illusory figures in different ways. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Discrimination of duration ratios by pigeons (Columba livia) and humans (Homo sapiens).

Humans were trained on 2 versions of a 2-alternative, forced-choice procedure. First, Ss judged which of 2 successive stimulus durations was longer. Second, Ss judged whether the ratio of the 2 durations was less or greater than a criterion ratio (e.g., 2:1). Accuracy was significantly lower for the task in which the judgment was made according to the ratio of the 2 durations. This result is different than that obtained by J. G. Fetterman et al (1989), who trained pigeons on a similar pair of tasks and found that pigeons' performance was comparable for the 2 discriminations. Comparisons of the pigeon and human data suggest that humans were more accurate than pigeons when the judgment involved which duration was longer, but that accuracy was comparable for the ratio-based task. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Numerical ordering in a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes): Planning, executing, and monitoring.

Perceptual and cognitive processes underlying the skill of ordering numerals were assessed in a female chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) with previous experience in computer-assisted numerical competence tasks. The subject was required to order 3 numerals from the range of 0–9 into an ascending series, with occasional probe trials (referred to as switch trials) in which the positions of the 2nd and 3rd numerals were exchanged immediately after the selection of the 1st. On these trials, errors were scored frequently, whereas correct responses to the intermediate numeral became reliably slower. These and other data indicated that the subject had already established, before making the 1st choice, (a) the correct sequence in which she was to select the numerals and (b) the motor sequence leading to a correct answer. These findings show that a 3-unit ordering task is supported in the chimpanzee, much as it is in humans, by planning, executing, and monitoring phases. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Spatial Memory and Monitoring of Hidden Items Through Spatial Displacements by Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).

This study examined chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) short-term memory for food location in near space. In Experiments 1 and 2, either 1 or 2 items (chocolate pieces) were hidden in an array of 3 or 5 containers that either remained stationary or were rotated 180° or 360°. When the array remained stationary, the chimpanzees remembered both item locations. When arrays were rotated, however, chimpanzees found only 1 item. In Experiment 3, 2 items were hidden in an array of 7 cups. Both items were found at levels significantly better than chance. Ninety percent of errors were made after the 1st item was found, and errors reflected memory failure rather than a failure of inhibitory control. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

The von Restorff effect in rats (Rattus norvegicus).

Two experiments examined the functional equivalence of memory in the rat (Rattus norvegicus) with memory in humans for serially presented items. Memory was assayed with an 8-arm radial maze, in which rats were allowed access to 5 arms of the maze and were then removed. Following a retention interval of 16 min, the rats were replaced in the maze and allowed to retrieve pellets from the 3 unvisited arms. The errors in reentering previously visited arms were noted. Both primacy and recency effects were found as with humans. Presenting a stimulus change after entry to 1 of the maze arms improved recall for that arm relative to when no change occurred. This effect was found using both handling and tone cues, and irrespective of whether the change consisted of presentation or nonpresentation of the cue. These results suggest that rats are subject to a von Restorff-like effect similar to that in humans. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Perception of complex geometric figures in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and humans (Homo sapiens): Analyses of visual similarity on the basis of choice reaction time.

In a conditional-discrimination task (matching-to-sample), assessed similarities among figures consisting of 2 elemental figures through the choice reaction time (RT), nonmetric multidimensional scaling, and hierarchical cluster analysis of data from chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and humans (Homo sapiens). Humans also rated similarities among figures. The results of the 3 experiments clearly indicated that the RT data obtained from chimpanzees' performances were useful measures of the similarities among figures. The results suggested that chimpanzees and humans perceived the complex figures similarly. The outer-contour elements were perceived most dominantly by both species, and the straight-line elements were perceived least dominantly. Both species showed the same perceptual hierarchy or dominance among perceptual categories, as determined by the similarity of simple elements, on the basis of transformational invariances. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Numerical competence in a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes).

A chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes), trained to count foods and objects by using Arabic numbers, demonstrated the ability to sum arrays of 0–4 food items placed in 2 of 3 possible sites. To address representational use of numbers, we next baited sites with Arabic numbers as stimuli. In both cases performance was significantly above chance from the first sessions, which suggests that without explicit training in combining arrays, the animal was able to select the correct arithmetic sum for arrays of foods or Arabic numbers under novel test conditions. These findings demonstrate that counting strategies and the representational use of numbers lie within the cognitive domain of the chimpanzee and compare favorably with the spontaneous use of addition algorithms demonstrated in preschool children. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Cardiac correlates of individual recognition in the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes).

Evaluated the ability of a female chimpanzee (aged 3.5 yrs) to recognize individuals depicted in photographs through the use of heart rate (HR) measures. HR was recorded before and during photographic projections of human caregivers, familiar individuals, strangers, and blank control slides. In the absence of explicit training or reinforcement, the S displayed a differential pattern of HR response to the stimulus categories. Although HR responses to all stimuli were predominantly deceleratory, the photographs of caregivers yielded consistently larger responses than other stimuli. Results indicate that the S was able to recognize individual humans from novel photographic representations and that HR can provide an objective measure than can reflect the social relation between the animal and the individual depicted. (21 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Spatial Ability and Home-Range Size: Examining the Relationship in Western Men and Women (Homo sapiens).

In mammals, spatial sex differences may have coevolved with sex differences in the size of home ranges. This study first evaluated whether, in keeping with most mammals and traditional human (Homo sapiens) societies, home ranges are larger in male than in female Westerners. Second, it established whether navigation patterns are associated with a broader set of spatial abilities in men than in women. Results showed that current male home ranges surpass female home ranges. Ranging was also positively correlated with achievement in tests of mental rotation, surface development, and location memory among men only, whereas it was associated with embedded figures scores in both sexes. Overall, these findings substantiate the adaptive role of several spatial sex differences in humans. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Visual Kin Recognition and Family Resemblance in Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).

The male-offspring biased visual kin recognition in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) reported by L. A. Parr and F. B. M. de Waal (1999) was replicated with human (Homo sapiens) participants and a principal components analysis (PCA) of pixel maps of the chimpanzee face photos. With the same original materials and methods, both humans and the PCA produced the same asymmetry in kin recognition as found with the chimpanzees. The PCA suggested that the asymmetry was a function of differences in the distribution of global characteristics associated with the framing of the faces in the son and daughter test sets. Eliminating potential framing biases, either by cropping the photos tightly to the faces or by rebalancing the recognition foils, eliminated the asymmetry but not human participants' ability to recognize chimpanzee kin. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Orientation invariant pattern recognition by pigeons (Columba livia) and humans (Homo sapiens).

The orientation invariance of visual pattern recognition in pigeons and humans was studied using a conditioned matching-to-sample procedure. A rotation effect, a lengthening of choice latencies with increasing angular disparities between sample and comparison stimuli, was replicated with humans. The choice speed and accuracy of pigeons was not affected by orientation disparities. Novel mirror-image stimuli, rotation of sample shapes, a delayed display of comparison shapes, and a mixed use of original and reflected sample shapes did not lead to a rotation effect in pigeons. With arbitrarily different odd comparison shapes, neither humans nor pigeons showed a rotation effect. Final experiments supported the possibility that the complete absence of a rotation effect in pigeons is because they are relatively better than humans at discriminating mirror-image shapes compared with arbitrary shapes. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Absolute pitch: Frequency-range discriminations in pigeons (Columba livia)--comparisons with zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) and humans (Homo sapiens).

Absolute pitch (AP) is the ability to classify individual pitches without an external referent. The authors compared results from pigeons (Columba livia, a nonsongbird species) with results (R. Weisman, M. Njegovan, C. Sturdy, L. Phillmore, J. Coyle, & D. Mewhort, 1998) from zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata, a songbird species) and humans (Homo sapiens) in AP tests that required classification of contiguous tones into 3 or 8 frequency ranges on the basis of correlations between the tones in each frequency range and reward. Pigeons' 3-range discriminations were similar in accuracy to those of zebra finches and humans. In the more challenging 8-range task, pigeons, like zebra finches, discriminated shifts from reward to nonreward from range to range across all 8 ranges, whereas humans discriminated only the 1st and last ranges. Taken together with previous research, the present experiments suggest that birds may have more accurate AP than mammals. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Unprompted recall and reporting of hidden objects by a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) after extended delays.

The ability to recall features of environments not present to the senses is important in human thinking, planning, and communication, but to date there are almost no data on recall capabilities in nonverbal animals. In this study, the author used symbol knowledge as a tool to study chimpanzee memory. An 11-year-old female chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) that had already learned a large number of arbitrarily designated geometric forms (lexigrams) watched as an experimenter hid an object in the woods outside her outdoor enclosure. The type and location of the object varied across trials. After an imposed delay of up to 16 h, the chimpanzee could interact indoors with a person who did not know that an object had been hidden, let alone the type or location of the object. A keyboard in the indoor cage displayed 256 lexigrams. From Trial 1, the chimpanzee seemed to do whatever it took to catch the person's attention and then touched the lexigram corresponding to the type of object hidden, pointed outdoors, went outdoors (if followed), and continued to point manually toward the object and vocalize until the person found the object. The subject indicated nonfood objects as well as more than 20 food types. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Response strategies inlist learning by orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus × P. abelii).

Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) develop strategies to acquire and execute serial lists (K. B. Swartz & S. A. Himmanen, 2001). Serial probe recognition studies of list memory have demonstrated similarities across monkeys and humans (S. F. Sands & A. A. Wright, 1980). The present study extended the investigation of list learning and memory to determine whether orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus × P. abelii) would show evidence of subjective organization of photographic lists in a manner similar to that shown by humans learning a list of unrelated words (E. Tulving, 1962). No evidence for the effective use of a subjective organization strategy was found, but the orangutans developed a right-to-left spatial response strategy, which emerged during the acquisition of 5-item lists. This strategy was an effective way to reduce the load on working memory when presented with a complex array of items. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Spatial memory of food-storing tits (Parus ater and P. atricapillus): Comparison of storing and nonstoring tasks.

We compared food-storing tits' memory for the locations of items they had stored and of food they had only seen. Experiment 1 showed that after 1.5–2 hrs black-capped chickadees (Parus atricapillus) and coal tits (P. ater) are better at discriminating between sites where they have stored a seed and ones simply visited than at discriminating between sites where they have seen a seed behind a window and ones visited. In Experiment 2, we compared chickadees' accuracy of return after 1.5 hrs to either seeds behind windows or seeds without windows in front of them. The probability of returning to seeds behind windows was lower than that of returning to stored seeds, but stored seeds and seeds without windows were visited with equal probability. In Experiment 3, neither stored seeds nor seeds without windows were forgotten after 26 hrs. The results are consistent with suggestions that memory for stored food is subserved by the same memory system as that for encountered food. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) remember the location of a hidden food item after altering their orientation to a spatial array.

Two chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) had a direct view of an experimenter placing a food item beneath one of several cups within a horizontal spatial array. The chimpanzees then were required to move around the spatial array, shifting their orientation to the array by 180°. Both chimpanzees remembered the location of the food item. In the next experiment, a visual barrier was placed between the chimpanzees and the spatial array after the food item had been hidden to prevent visual tracking of the location of the object during the chimpanzees' movement. One chimpanzee remembered the location of the hidden item in this variation. These results demonstrate another capacity for spatial memory in this species that complements data indicating chimpanzee spatial memory for invisible displacements, array rotations, and array transpositions. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)