Hydrogen and power co-generation based on coal and biomass/solid wastes co-gasification with carbon capture and storage

This paper investigates the potential use of renewable energy sources (various sorts of biomass) and solid wastes (municipal wastes, sewage sludge, meat and bone meal etc.) in a co-gasification process with coal to co-generate hydrogen and electricity with carbon capture and storage (CCS). The paper underlines one of the main advantages of gasification technology, namely the possibility to process lower grade fuels (lower grade coals, renewable energy sources, solid wastes etc.), which are more widely available than the high grade coals normally used in normal power plants, this fact contributing to the improvement of energy security supply. Based on a proposed plant concept that generates 400–500 MW net electricity with a flexible output of 0–200 MW_th hydrogen and a carbon capture rate of at least 90%, the paper develops fuel selection criteria for coal blending with various alternative fuels for optimizing plant performance e.g. oxygen consumption, cold gas efficiency, hydrogen production and overall energy efficiency. The key plant performance indicators were calculated for a number of case studies through process flow simulations (ChemCAD).     

Evaluation of syngas-based chemical looping applications for hydrogen and power co-generation with CCS

This paper evaluates hydrogen and power co-generation based on coal-gasification fitted with an iron-based chemical looping system for carbon capture and storage (CCS). The paper assess in details the whole hydrogen and power co-production chain based on coal gasification. Investigated plant concepts of syngas-based chemical looping generate about 350–450 MW net electricity with a flexible output of 0–200 MW_th hydrogen (based on lower heating value) with an almost total decarbonisation rate of the coal used.     

Investigation of hydrogen and power co-generation based on direct coal chemical looping systems

This paper evaluates hydrogen and power co-generation based on direct coal chemical looping systems with total decarbonization of the fossil fuel. As an illustrative example, an iron-based chemical looping system was assessed in various plant configurations. The designs generate 300–450 MW net electricity with flexible hydrogen output in the range of 0–200 MW_th (LHV). The capacity of evaluated plant concepts to have a flexible hydrogen output is an important aspect for integration in modern energy conversion systems. The carbon capture rate of evaluated concepts is almost total (>99%). The paper presents in details evaluated plant configurations, operational aspects as well as mass and energy integration issues. For comparison reason, a syngas-based chemical looping concept and Selexol^®-based pre-combustion capture configuration were also presented. Direct coal chemical looping configuration has significant advantages compared with syngas-based looping systems as well as solvent-based carbon capture configurations, the more important being higher energy efficiency, lower (or even zero) oxygen consumption and lower plant complexity. The results showed a clear increase of overall energy efficiency in comparison to the benchmark cases.     

Use of lower grade coals in IGCC plants with carbon capture for the co-production of hydrogen and electricity

This paper investigates the potential use of lower grade coals in an IGCC-CCS plant that generates electricity and produces hydrogen simultaneously with carbon dioxide capture and storage. The paper underlines one of the main advantages of gasification technology, namely the possibility to process lower grade coals, which are more widely available than the high-grade coals normally used in European power plants. Based on a proposed plant concept that generates about 400 MW net electricity with a flexible output of 0–50 MW_th hydrogen and a carbon capture rate of at least 90%, the paper develops fuel selection criteria for coal fluxing and blending of various types of coal for optimizing plant performance e.g. oxygen consumption, hydrogen production potential, specific syngas energy production per tonne of oxygen consumed, etc. These performance indicators were calculated for a number of case studies through process flow simulations. The main conclusion is that blending of coal types of higher and lower grade is more beneficial in terms of operation and cost performance than fluxing high-grade coals.     

Techno-economic and environmental performances of glycerol reforming for hydrogen and power production with low carbon dioxide emissions

This paper is evaluating from the conceptual design, thermal integration, techno-economic and environmental performances points of view the hydrogen and power generation using glycerol (as a biodiesel by-product) reforming processes at industrial scale with and without carbon capture. The evaluated hydrogen plant concepts produced 100,000 Nm³/h hydrogen (equivalent to 300 MW_th) with negligible net power output for export. The power plant concepts generated about 500 MW net power output. Hydrogen and power co-generation was also assessed. The CO₂ capture concepts used alkanolamine-based gas–liquid absorption. The CO₂ capture rate of the carbon capture unit is at least 90%, the carbon capture rate of the overall reforming process being at least 70%. Similar designs without carbon capture have been developed to quantify the energy and cost penalties for carbon capture. The various glycerol reforming cases were modelled and simulated to produce the mass & energy balances for quantification of key plant performance indicators (e.g. fuel consumption, energy efficiency, ancillary energy consumption, specific CO₂ emissions, capital and operational costs, production costs, cash flow analysis etc.). The evaluations show that glycerol reforming is promising concept for high energy efficiency processes with low CO₂ emissions.     

Thermo-economic process model for thermochemical production of Synthetic Natural Gas (SNG) from lignocellulosic biomass

A detailed thermo-economic model considering different technological alternatives for thermochemical production of Synthetic Natural Gas (SNG) from lignocellulosic biomass is presented. First, candidate technology for processes based on biomass gasification and subsequent methanation is discussed and assembled in a general superstructure. Both energetic and economic models for biomass drying with air or steam, thermal pretreatment by torrefaction or pyrolysis, indirectly and directly heated gasification, methane synthesis and carbon dioxide removal by physical absorption, pressure swing adsorption and polymeric membranes are then developed. Performance computations for the different process steps and some exemplary technology scenarios of integrated plants are carried out, and overall energy and exergy efficiencies in the range of 69–76% and 63–69%, respectively, are assessed. For these scenarios, the production cost of SNG including the investment depreciation is estimated to 76–107 € MWh⁻¹_SNG for a plant capacity of 20 MW_th,biomass, whereas 59–97 € MWh⁻¹_SNG might be reached at scales of 150 MW_th,biomass and above. Based on this work, a future thermo-economic optimisation will allow for determining the most promising options for the polygeneration of fuel, power and heat.     

Economic implications of pre- and post-combustion calcium looping configurations applied to gasification power plants

Gasification is a promising conversion technology to deliver high energy efficiency simultaneously with low energy and cost penalties for carbon capture. This paper is devoted to in-depth economic evaluations of pre- and post-combustion Calcium Looping (CaL) configurations for Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) power plants. The poly-generation capability, e.g. hydrogen and power co-generation, is also discussed. The post-combustion CaL option is a gasification power plant in which the flue gases from the gas turbine are treated for CO₂ capture in a carbonation–calcination cycle. In pre-combustion CaL option, the Sorbent Enhanced Water Gas Shift (SEWGS) feature is used to produce hydrogen which is used for power generation. As benchmark case, a conventional gasification power plant without carbon capture was considered. Net power output of evaluated cases is in the range of 550–600 MW with more than 95% carbon capture rate. The pre-combustion capture configuration was evaluated also in hydrogen and power co-generation scenario. The evaluations are concentrated for estimation of capital costs, specific investment cost, operational & maintenance (O&M) costs, CO₂ removal and avoidance costs, electricity costs, sensitivity analysis of technical and economic assumptions on key economic indicators etc.     

Hydrogen production from fossil fuels with carbon capture and storage based on chemical looping systems

This paper analyzes innovative processes for producing hydrogen from fossil fuels conversion (natural gas, coal, lignite) based on chemical looping techniques, allowing intrinsic CO₂ capture. This paper evaluates in details the iron-based chemical looping system used for hydrogen production in conjunction with natural gas and syngas produced from coal and lignite gasification. The paper assesses the potential applications of natural gas and syngas chemical looping combustion systems to generate hydrogen. Investigated plant concepts with natural gas and syngas-based chemical looping method produce 500 MW hydrogen (based on lower heating value) covering ancillary power consumption with an almost total decarbonisation rate of the fossil fuels used.The paper presents in details the plant concepts and the methodology used to evaluate the performances using critical design factors like: gasifier feeding system (various fuel transport gases), heat and power integration analysis, potential ways to increase the overall energy efficiency (e.g. steam integration of chemical looping unit into the combined cycle), hydrogen and carbon dioxide quality specifications considering the use of hydrogen in transport (fuel cells) and carbon dioxide storage in geological formation or used for EOR.     

Highly efficient electricity generation from biomass by integration and hybridization with combined cycle gas turbine (CCGT) plants for natural gas

Integration/co-firing with existing fossil fuel plants could give near term highly efficient and low cost power production from biomass. This paper presents a techno-economical analysis on options for integrating biomass thermal conversion (optimized for local resources ∼50 MW_th) with existing CCGT (combined cycle gas turbine) power plants (800–1400 MW_th). Options include hybrid combined cycles (HCC), indirect gasification of biomass and simple cycle biomass steam plants which are simulated using the software Ebsilon Professional and Aspen Plus. Levelized cost of electricity (LCoE) is calculated with cost functions derived from power plant data. Results show that the integrated HCC configurations (fully-fired) show a significantly higher efficiency (40–41%, LHV (lower heating value)) than a stand-alone steam plant (35.5%); roughly half of the efficiency (2.4% points) is due to more efficient fuel drying. Because of higher investment costs, HCC options have cost advantages over stand-alone options at high biomass fuel prices (>25 EUR/MWh) or low discount rates (<5%). Gasification options show even higher efficiency (46–50%), and the lowest LCoE for the options studied for fuel costs exceeding 10 EUR/MWh. It can be concluded that clear efficiency improvements and possible cost reductions can be reached by integration of biomass with CCGT power plants compared to stand-alone plants.     

Techno-economic and environmental evaluations of large scale gasification-based CCS project in Romania

Gasification is a promising technology in terms of reducing carbon capture energy and cost penalties as well as for multi-fuel multi-product operation capability. The paper evaluates two carbon capture options in terms of main techno-economic indicators. The first option involves pre-combustion capture, the syngas being catalytically shifted to convert carbon species into CO₂ and H₂. Gas–liquid absorption is used for separate H₂S and CO₂ capture, then clean gas is used for power generation. The second capture option is based on post-combustion capture using chemical absorption. The most promising gasifiers were evaluated in a CCS design.     

Decentralized generation of electricity with solid oxide fuel cells from centrally converted biomass

A thermodynamic evaluation of different energy conversion chains based on centralized biomass gasification and decentralized heat and power production by a solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) has been performed. Three different chains have been evaluated, the main difference between the chains is the secondary fuel produced via biomass gasification. The secondary fuels considered are hydrogen, synthetic natural gas (SNG) and syngas. These fuels are assumed to be distributed through a transport and distribution grid to the micro-combined heat and power (μ-CHP) systems based on a SOFC and a heat pump.     

Future prospects for production of methanol and hydrogen from biomass

Technical and economic prospects of the future production of methanol and hydrogen from biomass have been evaluated. A technology review, including promising future components, was made, resulting in a set of promising conversion concepts. Flowsheeting models were made to analyse the technical performance. Results were used for economic evaluations. Overall energy efficiencies are around 55% HHV for methanol and around 60% for hydrogen production. Accounting for the lower energy quality of fuel compared to electricity, once-through concepts perform better than the concepts aimed for fuel only production. Hot gas cleaning can contribute to a better performance. Systems of 400 MW_th input produce biofuels at US$ 8–12/GJ, this is above the current gasoline production price of US$ 4–6/GJ. This cost price is largely dictated by the capital investments. The outcomes for the various system types are rather comparable, although concepts focussing on optimised fuel production with little or no electricity co-production perform somewhat better. Hydrogen concepts using ceramic membranes perform well due to their higher overall efficiency combined with modest investment. Long-term (2020) cost reductions reside in cheaper biomass, technological learning, and application of large scales up to 2000 MW_th. This could bring the production costs of biofuels in the US$ 5–7/GJ range. Biomass-derived methanol and hydrogen are likely to become competitive fuels tomorrow.     

Heat extraction from supercritical water-cooled nuclear reactors for hydrogen production plants

Many current and future hydrogen production methods, such as steam methane reforming and thermochemical water splitting cycles, require large amounts of heat as the major energy input. Using nuclear heat is a promising option for reducing emissions of greenhouse gases and other pollutants, thereby helping achieve clean and sustainable future energy systems. Various heat transfer fluids are compared and evaluation criteria are proposed for the selection of a heat transfer fluid. It is determined that helium is a promising option due to it being inert and chemically stable and having good heat transfer properties. The intermediate heat exchanger for the heat extraction is analyzed and designed using the log mean temperature difference (LMTD) method with helium serving as the heat transfer fluid to extract heat from the supercritical water. It is found that if the heat extraction load is in the range of 100–330 MW_th, which approximately corresponds to a hydrogen production range of 40–125 tonnes per day, then a multi-tube and single-shell counter flow heat exchanger with a shell diameter of 0.7–1.3 m and length of 6.7 m encapsulating 420–1600 tubes of 0.025 m diameter would be appropriate according to the practical working conditions on the shell and tube sides. The analysis also shows that the diameter of the heat exchanger does not depend strongly on the heat transfer load if the load is smaller than 330 MW_th (125 tonnes H₂/day). This provides flexibility in case adjustments to the heat extraction load become necessary. However, if the heat load is larger than 330 MW_th, for example, 500 MW_th for 200 tonnes hydrogen per day, then a multi-tube and single-shell counter flow heat exchanger is not appropriate because the length-to-diameter ratio is outside of the recommended range.     

Co-gasification of catechol and starch in supercritical water for hydrogen production

Hydrogen production from waste feedstocks using supercritical water gasification (SCWG) is a promising approach towards cleaner fuel production and a solution for hard to treat wastes. In this study, the catalytic co-gasification of starch and catechol as models of carbohydrates and phenol compounds was investigated in a batch reactor at 28 MPa, 400–500 °C, from 10 to 30 min. The effects of reaction conditions, and the addition of calcium oxide (CaO) as a carbon dioxide (CO₂) sorbent and TiO₂ as catalyst on the gas yields and product distribution were investigated. Employing TiO₂ as a catalyst alone had no significant effect on the H₂ yield but when combined with CaO increased the hydrogen yield by 35% and promoted higher total organic carbon (TOC) reduction efficiencies. The process liquid effluent was characterized using GC–MS, with the results showing that the major non-polar components were phenol, substituted phenols, and cresols. An overall reaction scheme is provided.     

Hydrogen production and carbon dioxide enrichment using a catalytic membrane reactor with Ni metal catalyst and Pd-based membrane

We prepared a catalytic membrane reactor (CMR) by adopting a high-performance metal catalyst and Pd–Au membrane to investigate the possibility of hydrogen production concurrently with carbon dioxide enrichment (up to >80%) in a single-stage reactor from a simulated syngas of a coal gasification, via simultaneous WGS reaction and hydrogen separation process. The CO conversion was above 99% and the H₂ recovery was above 94% at del-P = 30 bar in a CMR. The best result for the concentration of the enriched CO₂ in the retentate side was 85.3% under the conditions of 350 °C, del-P = 30 bar and steam to carbon ratio of 2.0. These results show promise for a feasible simplified process able to achieve CO removal from a high-concentration CO mixture gas coming out of coal gasification via a water-gas shift reaction (WGS), to separate hydrogen and also to enrich CO₂ for pre-combustion capture and storage of CO₂ (CCS) in substitution for the conventional WGS and CO₂ separation stages in integrated gasification and combined cycle process integrated with CCS.     

Options for net zero emissions hydrogen from Victorian lignite. Part 1: Gaseous and liquefied hydrogen

This two-part paper investigates the feasibility of producing export quantities (770 t/d) of blue hydrogen meeting international standards, by gasification of Victorian lignite plus carbon capture and storage (CCS). The study involves a detailed Aspen Plus simulation analysis of the entire production process, taking into account fugitive methane emissions during lignite mining. Part 1 focusses on the resources, energy requirements and greenhouse gas emissions associated with production of gaseous and liquefied hydrogen, while Part 2 focusses on production of ammonia as a hydrogen carrier.In this study, the proposed process comprises lignite mining, lignite drying and milling, air separation unit (ASU), dry-feed entrained flow gasification, gas cooling and cleaning, sour water-gas shift reaction, acid gas removal, pressure swing adsorption (PSA) for hydrogen purification, elemental sulphur recovery, CO₂ compression for transport and injection, hydrogen liquefaction, steam and gas turbines to generate all process power, plus an optional post-combustion CO₂ capture step. High grade waste heat is utilised for process heat and power generation. Three alternative process scenarios are investigated as options to reduce resource utilisation and greenhouse gas emissions: replacing the gas turbine with renewable energy from off-site wind turbines, and co-gasification of lignite with either biomass or biochar. In each case, the specific net greenhouse gas intensity is estimated and compared to the EU Taxonomy specification for sustainable hydrogen.This is the first time that a coal-to-hydrogen study has quantified the greenhouse gas emissions across the entire production chain, including upstream fugitive methane emissions. It is found that both gaseous and liquefied hydrogen can be produced from Victorian lignite, along with all necessary electricity, with specific emissions intensity (SEI) of 2.70 kg CO₂-e/kg H₂ and 2.73 kg CO₂-e/kg H₂, respectively. These values conform to the EU Taxonomy limit of 3.0 kg CO₂-e/kg H₂. This result is achieved using a Selexol™ plant for CO₂ capture, operating at 89.5%–91.7% overall capture efficiency. Importantly, the very low fugitive methane emissions associated with Victorian lignite mining is crucial to the low SEI of the process, making this is a critical advantage over the alternative natural gas or black coal processes.This study shows that there are technical options available to further reduce the SEI to meet tightening emissions targets. An additional post-combustion MDEA CO₂ capture unit can be added to increase the capture efficiency to 99.0%–99.2% and reduce the SEI to 0.3 kg CO₂-e/kg H₂. Emissions intensity can be further reduced by utilising renewable energy rather than co-production of electricity on site. Net zero emissions can then be achieved by co-gasification with ≤1.4 dry wt.% biomass, while a higher proportion of biomass would achieve net-negative emissions. Thus, options exist for production of blue hydrogen from Victorian lignite consistent with a ‘net zero by 2050’ target.     

Effect of fuel blend composition on hydrogen yield in co-gasification of coal and non-woody biomass

In this study, torrefaction of sunflower seed cake and hydrogen production from torrefied sunflower seed cake via steam gasification were investigated. Torrefaction experiments were performed at 250, 300 and 350 °C for different times (10–30 min). Torrefaction at 300 °C for 30 min was selected to be optimum condition, considering the mass yield and energy densification ratio. Steam gasification of lignite, raw- and torrefied biomass, and their blends at different ratios were conducted at downdraft fixed bed reactor. For comparison, gasification experiments with pyrochar obtained at 500 °C were also performed. The maximum hydrogen yield of 100 mol/kg fuel was obtained steam gasification of pyrochar. The hydrogen yields of 84 and 75 mol/kg fuel were obtained from lignite and torrefied biomass, respectively. Remarkable synergic effect exhibited in co-gasification of lignite with raw biomass or torrefied biomass at a blending ratio of 1:1. In co-gasification, the highest hydrogen yield of 110 mol/kg fuel was obtained from torrefied biomass-lignite (1:1) blend, while a hydrogen yield from pyrochar-lignite (1:1) blend was 98 mol/kg. The overall results showed that in co-gasification of lignite with biomass, the yields of hydrogen depend on the volatiles content of raw biomass/torrefied biomass, besides alkaline earth metals (AAEMs) content.     

From coal towards renewables: Catalytic/synergistic effects during steam co-gasification of switchgrass and coal in a pilot-scale bubbling fluidized bed

Recent environmental sharp curbs on fossil fuel energy systems such as coal power plants due to their greenhouse gas emissions have compelled industries to include renewable fuels. Biomass/coal co-gasification could provide a transition from energy production based on fossil fuels to renewables. A low-ash coal and switchgrass rich in potassium were selected on the basis of previous thermogravimetric studies to steam co-gasify 50:50 wt% coal:switchgrass mixtures in a pilot scale bubbling fluidized bed reactor with silica sand as the bed material at ∼800 and 860 °C and 1 atm. With the switchgrass added to coal, the hydrogen and cold gas efficiencies, gas yield and HHV of the product gas were enhanced remarkably relative to single-fuel gasification. The product gas tar yield also decreased considerably due to decomposition of tar catalyzed by switchgrass alkali and alkaline earth metals. Switchgrass ash therefore can act as inexpensive natural catalysts for steam gasification and assist in operating at lower temperatures without being penalized by an increase in product tar yield. An equilibrium model over-predicted hydrogen and under-predicted methane concentrations. However, an empirically kinetically-modified model was able to predict the product gas compositions accurately.     

Biomethanol production from gasification of non-woody plant in South Africa: Optimum scale and economic performance

Methanol production from biomass is a promising carbon neutral fuel, well suited for use in fuel cell vehicles (FCVs), as transportation fuel and as chemical building block. The concept used in this study incorporates an innovative Absorption Enhanced Reforming (AER) gasification process, which enables an efficient conversion of biomass into a hydrogen-rich gas (syngas) and then, uses the Mitsubishi methanol converter (superconverter) for methanol synthesis. Technical and economic prospects for production of methanol have been evaluated. The methanol plants described have a biomass input between 10 and 2000 MW_th. The economy of the methanol production plants is very dependent on the production capacity and large-scale facilities are required to benefit from economies of scale. However, large-scale plants are likely to have higher transportation costs per unit biomass transported as a result of longer transportation distances. Analyses show that lower unit investment costs accompanying increased production scale outweighs the cost for transporting larger quantities of biomass. The unit cost of methanol production mostly depends on the capital investments. The total unit cost of methanol is found to decrease from about 10.66 R/l for a 10 MW_th to about 6.44 R/l for a 60 MW_th and 3.95 R/l for a 400 MW_th methanol plant. The unit costs stabilise (a near flat profile was observed) for plant sizes between 400 and 2000 MW_th, but the unit cost do however continue to decrease to about 2.89 R/l for a 2000 MW_th plant. Long term cost reduction mainly resides in technological learning and large-scale production. Therefore, technology development towards large-scale technology that takes into account sustainable biomass production could be a better choice due to economic reasons.     

A comprehensive review of direct carbon fuel cell technology

Fuel cells are under development for a range of applications for transport, stationary and portable power appliances. Fuel cell technology has advanced to the stage where commercial field trials for both transport and stationary applications are in progress. The electric efficiency typically varies between 40 and 60% for gaseous or liquid fuels. About 30–40% of the energy of the fuel is available as heat, the quality of which varies based on the operating temperature of the fuel cell. The utilisation of this heat component to further boost system efficiency is dictated by the application and end-use requirements. Fuel cells utilise either a gaseous or liquid fuel with most using hydrogen or synthetic gas produced by a variety of different means (reforming of natural gas or liquefied petroleum gas, reforming of liquid fuels such as diesel and kerosene, coal or biomass gasification, or hydrogen produced via water splitting/electrolysis). Direct Carbon Fuel Cells (DCFC) utilise solid carbon as the fuel and have historically attracted less investment than other types of gas or liquid fed fuel cells. However, volatility in gas and oil commodity prices and the increasing concern about the environmental impact of burning heavy fossil fuels for power generation has led to DCFCs gaining more attention within the global research community. A DCFC converts the chemical energy in solid carbon directly into electricity through its direct electrochemical oxidation. The fuel utilisation can be almost 100% as the fuel feed and product gases are distinct phases and thus can be easily separated. This is not the case with other fuel cell types for which the fuel utilisation within the cell is typically limited to below 85%. The theoretical efficiency is also high, around 100%. The combination of these two factors, lead to the projected electric efficiency of DCFC approaching 80% - approximately twice the efficiency of current generation coal fired power plants, thus leading to a 50% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions. The amount of CO₂ for storage/sequestration is also halved. Moreover, the exit gas is an almost pure CO₂ stream, requiring little or no gas separation before compression for sequestration. Therefore, the energy and cost penalties to capture the CO₂ will also be significantly less than for other technologies. Furthermore, a variety of abundant fuels such as coal, coke, tar, biomass and organic waste can be used. Despite these advantages, the technology is at an early stage of development requiring solutions to many complex challenges related to materials degradation, fuel delivery, reaction kinetics, stack fabrication and system design, before it can be considered for commercialisation. This paper, following a brief introduction to other fuel cells, reviews in detail the current status of the direct carbon fuel cell technology, recent progress, technical challenges and discusses the future of the technology.