非气腹单孔拖出式腹腔镜阑尾切除术与常规腹腔镜阑尾切除术的比较

目的 探讨非气腹单孔拖出式腹腔镜阑尾切除术的疗效.方法 2010年1月~2012年1月对93例慢性阑尾炎、急性单纯性阑尾炎分别施行非气腹单孔拖出式腹腔镜阑尾切除手术（单孔组,n=42）和常规腹腔镜阑尾切除术（常规组,n=51）,比较2组手术时间、术后排气时间、术后住院时间及费用.结果 单孔组8例为后位阑尾,无法单钳局部分离,改行传统腹腔镜下阑尾切除;常规组51例行传统腹腔镜下三孔阑尾切除术,无中转开腹.单孔组手术时间（26.1±3.2）min,显著短于常规组（47.1±4.4）min（t=-23.912,P=0.000）;单孔组术后恢复排气时间（12.1±2.1）h,显著短于常规组（20.1±1.9）h（t=-18.231,P=0.000）;单孔组术后住院时间（2.1±0.7）d,明显短于常规组（3.1±0.6）d（t=-7.039,P=0.000）;单孔组住院费用（5066.7±99.6）元明显少于常规组（5996.7±119.3）元（t=-37.543,P=0.000）.93例术后随访3～6个月,平均5.3月,均无并发症发生.结论 非气腹单孔拖出式腹腔镜阑尾切除术手术安全可行,与常规三孔法腹腔阑尾切除术相比,恢复快、费用少,切口瘢痕藏于脐部,美容效果更好.     

急性化脓性阑尾炎腹腔镜阑尾切除术的效果

目的分析急性化脓性阑尾炎腹腔镜阑尾切除术的效果。方法将70例急性化脓性阑尾炎患者随机分为2组,每组35例。对照组实施开腹阑尾切除术,观察组实施腹腔镜阑尾切除术。比较2组手术时间、术中出血量、术后胃肠功能恢复时间、并发症发生率及住院时间等指标。结果 2组手术时间差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。观察组术中出血量、术后胃肠功能恢复时间、住院时间及并发症发生率均少于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗急性化脓性阑尾炎,创伤小、术后并发症少、恢复时间短,治疗效果好。     

腹腔镜阑尾切除术在急性和慢性阑尾炎中应用疗效的比较

目的 通过探讨腹腔镜阑尾切除术在治疗急性和慢性阑尾炎中疗效的优缺点,总结腹腔镜阑尾切除术的手术经验.方法 连续收集北京大学人民医院自2008年6月至2009年12月129例阑尾炎患者的资料,比较急性阑尾炎患者腹腔镜与开腹手术的临床效果,以及急性与慢性阑尾炎的腹腔镜治疗效果.结果 对于急性阑尾炎患者,接受腹腔镜手术患者术后住院时间明显少于开腹组[(4.8±2.6)d比(7.0±1.3)d,t=0.679,P=0.006].在接受腹腔镜组阑尾切除术的患者中,急性阑尾炎患者的平均手术时间[(77±33) min比(55±23) min,t=3.431,P＜0.01]、术后首次排气时间[(2.3±1.2)d比(1.4±0.9)d,t=4.665,P＜0.01]、术后首次进食时间[(2.3±1.4)d比(1.2±0.6)d,t=4.517,P＜0.01)]均长于慢性阑尾炎患者.结论 腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎安全可行;与慢性阑尾炎患者相比,急性阑尾炎患者行腹腔镜阑尾切除术可能导致更多的术后腹腔脓肿和小肠梗阻等并发症.     

腹腔镜阑尾切除术的疗效及对并发症的影响

目的比较腹腔镜阑尾切除术（LA）与开腹阑尾切除术（OA）治疗急阑尾炎的临床疗效及并发症。 方法选择2014年1月至2015年5月收治的拟行阑尾切除术的阑尾炎患者118例,将患者随机分为试验组和对照组,每组59例,试验组采用LA术,对照组采用OA术,比较两组患者的临床效果及并发症发生情况,评价急性和慢性阑尾炎行腹腔镜手术的效果。 结果与对照组比较,试验组的手术时间延长,而住院时间、术后首次下床、排气及进食时间均明显缩短,24 h镇痛药物使用率也显著减少,住院费用明显增加（t=14.342、6.916、4.166、9.527、8.036,χ²=5.950,t=32.663,P<0.05）。试验组中急性阑尾炎患者34例,与25例慢性阑尾炎患者比较,手术时间、住院时间、术后首次排气及进食时间均明显延长,术中出血量明显增加（t=8.195、1.776、5.329、4.337、3.757,P<0.05）。试验组术后24 h、48 h时白细胞（WBC）、C反应蛋白（CRP）水平均显著低于对照组（P<0.05）;伤口感染、腹腔脓肿的发生率及总发生率显著低于对照组（χ²=4.827、4.140、10.602,P<0.05）。 结论LA治疗急性及慢性阑尾炎均安全有效,可减少术后并发症,促进术后恢复。     

肥胖患者行腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术疗效的对比研究

目的 对比分析肥胖患者行腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术的临床效果.方法 回顾性分析2008-2010年因急性阑尾炎在中国医科大学附属盛京医院行阑尾切除术的肥胖患者153例的临床资料.153例中,腹腔镜阑尾切除术92例(其中4例转为开腹),开腹阑尾切除术61例,对两种术式的手术时间、术中出血量、术后排气时间、术后止痛药使用频率、术后主要并发症的发生率、住院时间和住院费用进行比较.计数资料比较采用x2检验,计量资料采用t检验.结果 腹腔镜阑尾切除术组在手术时间、术中出血量、术后排气时间、术后止痛药使用频率、术后主要并发症的发生率、住院时间方面均短于或少于开腹阑尾切除术组,差异有统计学意义(手术时间:t=14.0,P＜0.01;术中出血量:t =19.7,P＜0.01;术后排气时间:t=12.3,P＜0.01;术后止痛药使用频率:t=21.01,P＜0.01;术后主要并发症的发生率:x2=40.138,P＜0.01;住院时间:t=17.3,P＜0.01).两者在住院总花费上的差异无统计学意义(=1.434,P =0.154).结论 肥胖患者行腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗阑尾炎与开腹阑尾切除术相比具有创伤小、恢复快、并发症少和平均住院时间短等优点,是治疗肥胖阑尾炎患者理想的手术方式.     

腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎的临床疗效观察

目的总结急性阑尾炎腹腔镜阑尾切除术的体会。方法随机将64例急性阑尾炎患者分为对照组和腹腔镜组2组,每组32例。对照组实施开腹阑尾切除术;腹腔镜组采用腹腔镜阑尾切除术,比较2组手术时间、术中出血量、术后排气时间及并发症发生率。结果 2组手术时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P0.05),腹腔镜组术中出血量少于对照组,术后排气时间及术后并发症低于对照组,2组比较,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎,创伤小,术后并发症低,患者恢复时间短,效果肯定。     

发病时间大于72小时的急性阑尾炎腹腔镜手术疗效分析

目的探讨对发病时间>72 h的急性阑尾炎行腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗的安全性及疗效。 方法回顾性分析鞍钢集团总医院2013年1月至2019年10月腹腔镜手术治疗急性阑尾炎675例临床资料,根据发病的时间差异,分为>72 h组158例和≤72 h组517例,比较两组患者的病理特征、应用抗生素比例、手术情况和术后并发症发生情况。 结果两组病理类型差异有统计学意义（χ²=23.690,P=0.002）,术后均无严重并发症发生。与≤72 h组相比,>72 h组入院前抗生素使用比例更高（94.30% vs 82.21%,χ²=10.361,P=0.037）,手术时间更长（t=3.998,P=0.029）,术中出血量更多（t=2.368,P=0.035）。 结论对于发病时间>72 h的急性阑尾炎患者行腹腔镜阑尾切除术安全可行,可以避免二次住院手术治疗,缩短病程,减少住院费用和患者痛苦。     

腹腔镜阑尾切除术阑尾残端荷包缝合包埋与Hem-o-lok的比较

目的探讨荷包缝合包埋阑尾残端在腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的应用价值。方法2010年6月-2013年6月因急慢性阑尾炎行腹腔镜阑尾切除术101例,采用2种不同方法处理阑尾残端：50例阑尾根部行丝线结扎后,荷包缝合包埋残端（包埋组）;5l例用Hem-o-lok夹闭阑尾根部后,不再进一步处理阑尾残端（Hem-o-lok组）,比较2组手术时间和术后患者恢复情况。结果2组术后并发症、术后住院时间无显著性差异（P〉0．05）。包埋组手术时间（55．8±5．8）min,明显长于Hem-o-lok组（44．8±5．7）min（t=9．613,P=0．000）;包埋组手术费用（5086±58）元,显著少于Hem-o-lok组（5430±50）元（t=-31．945,P=0．000）。结论2种处理阑尾残端的方法都是安全、有效的,但荷包缝合包埋阑尾残端更符合传统阑尾切除术的手术操作要求,对术者腹腔镜操作水平要求较高,但节省手术费用。Hem-o-lok夹闭阑尾根部节省手术时间,操作简单,更适合于初学者。     

比较腹腔镜阑尾切除术与常规开腹阑尾切除术的效果

目的比较腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开腹阑尾切除术的效果。方法随机将2016-03—2017-03间收治的106例急性阑尾炎患者分为2组,各53例。对照组实施开腹阑尾切除术,观察组实施腹腔镜阑尾切除术。比较2组的手术时间、术中出血量和术后肛门恢复排气时间、切口感染发生率及住院时间。结果观察组手术时间、术中出血量和术后肛门恢复排气时间、切口感染发生率及住院时间均少于或短于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论与开腹阑尾切除术比较,腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎,创伤小,术后患者恢复快。     

急性阑尾炎腹腔镜阑尾切除术疗效观察

目的观察腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎的效果。方法选取2013-05—2016-05收治的72例急性阑尾炎患者,根据手术方法不同分为2组,各36例。观察组给予腹腔镜阑尾切除术,对照组实施传统开腹阑尾切除术,比较2组患者手术时间、术中出血量、下床活动时间、住院时间及并发症发生率。结果观察组手术时间、术中出血量、下床活动时间及住院时间均低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);观察组并发症发生率低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎,手术时间短、术中出血量小、患者术后恢复快,具有较高的安全性和实用性。     

腹腔镜在小儿阑尾切除术中的应用价值及对C反应蛋白的影响

目的:探讨腹腔镜小儿阑尾切除术的应用价值及对患儿血清C反应蛋白的影响。方法:2016年1~12月为100例患儿行阑尾切除术。将其分为两组,观察组行腹腔镜阑尾切除术(n=48),对照组行开腹阑尾切除术(n=52),对比两组治疗效果。结果:观察组患儿术中指标(术中出血量、手术时间、切口长度、拔管时间、镇痛药物使用率)、术后指标(遗留瘢痕率、住院费用、胃肠功能恢复时间、进食时间、抗生素使用时间)、术后并发症(腹腔残余感染、切口感染、粘连性肠梗阻)发生率明显低于对照组(P0.05);两组患儿治疗前C反应蛋白浓度差异无统计学意义(P0.05);术后第1天、第3天观察组C反应蛋白浓度更低(P0.05)。结论:腹腔镜小儿阑尾切除术创伤小,康复快,并发症少,值得推荐。     

腹腔镜手术治疗急性阑尾炎72例报告

目的探讨腹腔镜手术治疗急性阑尾炎的价值. 方法对54例急性化脓性阑尾炎、18例阑尾炎穿孔并腹膜炎行腹腔镜手术治疗,并与同期72例阑尾炎开放手术比较. 结果腹腔镜组的并发症发生率、肠功能恢复时间及平均住院日分别为0,0.5 d,2.3 d,对照组分别为15%,2.5 d,6.8 d,两组比较有显著差异. 结论与开放手术比较,腹腔镜治疗急性化脓性阑尾炎及阑尾穿孔性腹膜炎有并发症少,术后恢复快的优势.     

Laparoscopic appendectomy in children after the learning curve.

OBJECTIVES: Despite its increasing popularity, several recent studies comparing laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) with open appendectomy (OA) in children have failed to demonstrate significant improvements in patient outcomes. Many series include the "learning curve," wherein surgeons inexperienced with laparoscopic techniques compare their results with results with OA with its extensive history. This study was designed to investigate outcomes in pediatric appendectomy patients managed by surgeons with extensive laparoscopic experience. METHODS: We preformed a retrospective review of 197 consecutive children undergoing appendectomy for presumed acute appendicitis from January 2002 through May 2004 at a university-affiliated community hospital by pediatric and general surgeons with extensive laparoscopic surgical experience. RESULTS: The study included 117 patients who underwent LA and 80 who underwent OA. Of 122 acute appendicitis cases, mean operating times were 47 minutes (LA) and 48 minutes (OA). The LA group (n=71) had a faster return to full diet (17.6 h vs. 28.6 h, P=0.0008), and shorter postoperative length of stay (LOS) (1.06 d vs. 1.66 d, P<0.0001) compared with the OA group (n = 51). Complication rates, time on intravenous (IV) antibiotics, and IV opiates were similar among the 2 groups. Complicated appendicitis cases (LA, n=34; OA, n=26) were similar with regard to LOS, return to normal bowel function, complication rate and time on IV antibiotics and opiates, but was associated with an increased operation time (LA, 65 min; OA, 51 min, P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Following the completion of the laparoscopic surgery learning curve, LA has a comparable operation time and results in a decreased postoperative LOS, and faster return to normal bowel function compared with OA in children with acute nongangrenous, nonperforated appendicitis.     

Laparoscopic vs mini-incision open appendectomy

AIM: To compare laparoscopic vs mini-incision open appendectomy in light of recent data at our centre.METHODS: The data of patients who underwen appendectomy between January 2011 and June 2013 were collected. The data included patients' demographic data, procedure time, length of hospital stay, the need for pain medicine, postoperative visual analog scale o pain, and morbidities. Pregnant women and patients with previous lower abdominal surgery were excluded Patients with surgery converted from laparoscopic appendectomy(LA) to mini-incision open appendectomy(MOA) were excluded. Patients were divided into two groups: LA and MOA done by the same surgeon. The patients were randomized into MOA and LA groups a computer-generated number. The diagnosis of acute appendicitis was made by the surgeon with physica examination, laboratory values, and radiological tests(abdominal ultrasound or computed tomography). Al operations were performed with general anaesthesia The postoperative vision analog scale score was recorded at postoperative hours 1, 6, 12, and 24. Patients were discharged when they tolerated normal food and passed gas and were followed up every week for three weeks as outpatients.RESULTS: Of the 243 patients, 121(49.9%) underwen MOA, while 122(50.1%) had laparoscopic appendectomy There were no significant differences in operation time between the two groups(P = 0.844), whereas the visua analog scale of pain was significantly higher in the open appendectomy group at the 1st hour(P = 0.001), 6th hour(P = 0.001), and 12 th hour(P = 0.027). The need for analgesic medication was significantly higher in the MOA group(P = 0.001). There were no differences between the two groups in terms of morbidity rate(P = 0.599)The rate of total complications was similar between the two groups(6.5% in LA vs 7.4% in OA, P = 0.599). Al wound infections were treated non-surgically. Six ou of seven patients with pelvic abscess were successfully treated with percutaneous drainage; one patient requiredsurgical drainage after a failed percutaneous drainage. There were no differences in the period of hospital stay, operation time, and postoperative complication rate between the two groups. Laparoscopic appendectomy decreases the need for analgesic medications and the visual analog scale of pain.CONCLUSION: The laparoscopic appendectomy should be considered as a standard treatment for acute appendicitis. Mini-incision appendectomy is an alternative for a select group of patients.     

小儿免气腹单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术与经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术的对比研究

目的:探讨免气腹单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术的手术效果及方法。方法:将180例阑尾炎患儿随机分为两组,100例行免气腹单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术(A组),80例行经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术(B组),对比两组手术时间、术后下床活动时间、术后胃肠功能恢复时间、术后住院时间及住院费用等指标。结果:180例手术均获成功。两组手术时间、住院费用差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),A组术后下床活动时间、术后胃肠功能恢复时间、术后住院时间显著短于B组(P<0.001)。结论:免气腹单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术具有创伤更小、康复快、住院时间短、不增加费用等优点,是安全、有效的,在基层医院可推广应用。     

经脐单孔与传统腹腔镜手术在肥胖急性阑尾炎患者中的应用——病例对照研究

【摘要】 目的 探讨肥胖急性阑尾炎患者行经脐单孔腹腔镜手术的安全性、可行性。方法 选取2014年3月~2015年9月我院收治的80例成人肥胖急性阑尾炎患者随机分成两组,经脐单孔组患者采用经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术,对照组患者采用传统腹腔镜阑尾切除术(传统腹腔镜组)。比较两组患者的一般情况、ASA(手术危险程度)分级、阑尾炎类型、手术指标、术后恢复、术后并发症等。结果〓两组患者间年龄、性别、体重指数、ASA(手术危险程度)分级、阑尾炎类型,差异均无统计学意义。两组患者间手术时间、术中出血量、进食流质时间、住院时间,差异均无统计学意义。经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除组较及对照组术后美容满意度评分分别为9.58(9~10),8.60(8~9),差异有明显统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组术后疼痛评分分别为2.8(1~5),3.3(2~6),差异无统计学意义。经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除组有1例中转。结论〓肥胖急性阑尾炎患者行单孔腹腔镜手术安全、可行,并可获得较好术后美容满意度评分。     

腹腔镜治疗小儿阑尾炎148例分析

目的总结腹腔镜阑尾切除术（LA）治疗儿童阑尾炎的经验。方法回顾性分析2004年1月至2011年4月行LA治疗儿童阑尾炎患儿共148例,对比同期139例开腹阑尾切除术（OA）患儿临床资料,比较术中出血量、术后肠功能恢复时间、术后住院时间、切口感染、置腹腔引流率、拔腹腔引流管时间、腹腔脓肿发生率、肠梗阻发生率、再次手术率差异、手术时间等指标。结果IA组与OA组比较,两组中术中出血量、术后肠功能恢复时间、术后住院时间、切口感染、腹腔脓肿发生率、肠梗阻发生率、再次手术率差异均有统计学意义（P〈0．05）;置腹腔引流率、拔腹腔引流管时间差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05）;LA组较OA组手术时间长,差异有统计学意义（P〉0．05）。结论LA适于治疗各型儿童阑尾炎,安全有效,术后并发症少,美容效果佳,是阑尾炎治疗的一种较好的方法。     

Laparoscopic appendectomy in children can be done as a fast-track or same-day surgery.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery has reduced the length of hospital stay for common operations like cholecystectomy, gastric fundoplication, and appendectomy. We have noticed a reduction in length of hospital stay for children undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy. We, therefore, looked at our data to assess whether laparoscopic appendectomy in children could be performed as fast-track or same-day surgery (< or = 24-hour postoperative stay). METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of the records of all children who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for suspected appendicitis during a 3-year period (7/97 to 7/00). RESULTS: Laparoscopic appendectomy was performed in 79 children (44 boys and 35 girls), between 2 to 17 years of age (mean, 11 years). In 4 (5%) children with perforated appendicitis, the laparoscopic appendectomy was converted to an open appendectomy. At operation, 51 (64.5%) had acute appendicitis, 22 (27.8%) had perforated appendicitis, 4 (5%) had ruptured ovarian cysts, and 2 (2.5%) had no pathology. The median operative time was 54 minutes. Total length of stay for all 79 patients was a median of 58 hours, and median postoperative LOS was 35 hours. Complications included wound infection (2), abdominal abscess (4), drug rash (2), and epididymo-orchitis (1). In 57 (72%) children without perforated appendicitis, the total length of hospital stay was a median of 42 hours, while median postoperative length of stay was only 28 hours. Thirty-two (56%) children went home in < or = 24 hours following laparoscopic appendectomy. No significant morbidity was noted in the nonperforated group (drug rash, 1 fever > 24 hrs, 3); and no readmissions or reoperations were necessary on follow-up. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic appendectomy is safe and effective for treating children with appendicitis. Laparoscopic appendectomy may be safely performed as fast-track or same-day surgery, in select children without perforated appendicitis, with a postoperative stay of < or = 24 hours.     

Comparison of clinical and histopathological features of patients who underwent incidental or emergency appendectomy

BACKGROUND Incidental appendectomy can be defined as the removal of a clinically normal appendix during another surgical procedure unrelated to appendicitis or other appendicular diseases.AIM To compare the demographic, biochemical, and histopathological features of the patients who underwent incidental and standard appendectomy.METHODS The demographic, biochemical, and histopathological data of 72 patients(Incidental App group) who underwent incidental appendectomy during living donor hepatectomy at our Liver Transplant Center between June 2009 and December 2016 were compared with data of 288 patients(Acute App group) who underwent appendectomy for presumed acute appendicitis. The Incidental App group was matched at random in a 1:4 ratio with the Acute App group in the same time frame. Appendectomy specimens of both groups were re-evaluated by two experienced pathologists.RESULTS Statistically significant differences were found between groups in terms of age(P= 0.044), white blood cell count(P 0.001), neutrophil(P 0.001), lymphocyte(P 0.001), red cell distribution width(P = 0.036), mean corpuscular hemoglobin(P= 0.001), bilirubin(P = 0.002), appendix width(P 0.001), and presence of acute appendicitis histopathologically(P 0.001). However, no statistically significant differences were found between groups in terms of gender, platelet, mean platelet volume, mean corpuscular volume, platelet distribution width, appendix length. While the most common histopathological findings in the Incidental App group were normal appendix vermiformis(72.2%), fibrous obliteration(9.7%)and acute appendicitis(6.9%), the most common histopathological findings in the Acute App group were non-perforated acute appendicitis(62.8%), perforated appendicitis(16.7%), lymphoid hyperplasia(8.3%), and appendix vermiformis(6.3%).CONCLUSION Careful inspection of the entire abdominal cavity is useful for patients undergoing major abdominal surgery such as donor hepatectomy. We think that experience is parallel to the surgeon's foresight, and we should not hesitate to perform incidental appendectomy when necessary