Y形偏心支撑-高强钢框架结构抗震性能试验研究

为研究Y形偏心支撑-高强钢框架结构抗震性能,在已完成的1∶2缩尺3层模型结构振动台试验的基础上,重新设计了耗能梁段,并对该结构再次进行振动台试验。试验中选取El Centro波、Taft波和兰州波作为地震动输入并考虑7度多遇到9度罕遇的地震水准,分析了结构在水平地震作用下的动力特性、加速度响应、位移响应、应变响应、剪力分布等,并与已有试验结果进行了对比。通过ABAQUS建立了有限元分析模型,与试验结果进行对比。结果表明：该结构在多遇地震作用下处于弹性状态,在罕遇地震作用下表现为耗能梁段的局部破坏;耗能梁段破坏后,结构刚度大幅下降,但未发生倒塌;在多遇地震和罕遇地震作用下,结构的最大层间位移角满足抗震规范层间位移角限值的相关要求;在罕遇地震作用下,耗能梁段进入塑性状态而进行耗能,其他构件仍保持弹性状态;所建立的有限元模型可以有效模拟振动台试验结果。     

高层高强钢组合Y型偏心支撑钢框架结构抗震性能研究

伴随高强钢组合Y型偏心支撑钢框架结构的不断发展与更大范围的运用,为更好地掌握此类框架结构的抗震性能与综合表现,本文围绕该问题进行一系列的深入探究.在具体的分析过程中,首先通过ABAQUS有限元软件创建了相应的运算模型,并和试验结果展开对比分析,明确计算模型的可靠性.然后借助有限元分析软件ETABS建立了10层Y型钢框架...     

高强钢组合K形偏心支撑框架抗震性能对比分析

为研究不同强度组合的高强钢组合K形偏心支撑框架结构的抗震性能,设计了一组不同强度(Q345、Q460、Q690钢材)组合的5层K形偏心支撑框架结构算例Q345-5、Q460-5和算例Q690-5,选取10条地震动记录对其进行动力时程分析,得到各算例在不同水准地震作用下的耗能梁段转角和层间位移角。研究表明:8度罕遇地震作用下,高强钢组合K形偏心支撑框架的层间位移角比传统K形偏心支撑钢框架大,各算例耗能梁段全部进入塑性变形阶段;塑性层间位移角到达规范限值时,算例Q460-5框架梁开始进入塑性变形阶段,算例Q690-5框架柱、框架梁和支撑均处于弹性变形阶段,还可以承受更大的地震作用;达到定义的极限状态时,与传统偏心支撑钢框架相比,算例Q460-5能够承受的地震作用和耗能梁段转角更小;算例Q690-5承受的地震作用和耗能梁段转角更大。     

基于性能设计的高强钢组合Y形偏心支撑钢框架抗震性能研究

Y形偏心支撑钢框架结构中耗能梁段置于框架梁之外,耗能梁段变形不会对主体结构和楼板造成损害,震后易于修复更换。为了保证耗能梁段充分发挥塑性变形进行耗能,非耗能构件(框架梁、框架柱)截面设计往往过大,浪费钢材且限制了偏心支撑钢框架的应用。高强钢组合偏心支撑框架结构是指耗能梁段采用普通钢材(Q345钢),而框架梁、柱等非耗能构件采用高强度钢材(如Q460),不仅有效减小构件截面,而且可以推动高强钢在抗震设防区的应用,经济效益显著。采用基于性能的抗震设计方法设计了5层、10层、15层和20层的Y形偏心支撑钢框架结构,算例模型包括高强钢组合Y形偏心支撑钢框架和传统普通钢Y形偏心支撑钢框架,通过Pushover分析和时程分析研究该结构形式的承载力、抗侧刚度、层间侧移分布及破坏模式。研究表明:相同设计条件下,高强钢组合Y形偏心支撑钢框架结构与普通钢Y形偏心支撑钢框架结构的承载能力相近,但抗侧刚度略低,罕遇地震作用下二者具有相似的层间侧移分布和破坏模式。     

多层高强钢组合Y形偏心支撑钢框架抗震性能试验研究

为研究高强钢组合Y形偏心支撑钢框架结构的抗震性能,进行了一个1∶2缩尺模型的三层结构试件的低周往复加载试验,从结构的承载能力、刚度退化、位移延性、耗能能力及破坏模式等方面评价了结构的抗震性能,试验采用三质点倒三角形比例加载。研究结果表明：高强钢组合Y形偏心支撑结构具有较高的承载能力、较好的位移延性和耗能能力,屈服强度较低的耗能连梁的弹塑性变形耗散了大部分地震能量,而高强钢非耗能构件基本处于弹性受力状态,保证了极限状态下结构的完整性。框架梁与耗能连梁连接节点处受力复杂、应力集中严重,加之楼板对框架梁的约束,该节点处变形较大,使得试件最终在此位置破坏。     

基于抗震韧性的高强钢组合偏心支撑钢框架研究

将基于抗震韧性的设计理念引入高强钢组合偏心支撑钢框架结构.通过韧性设计,使得高强钢组合偏心支撑钢框架结构,在满足结构抗震目的的同时,结构构件参与结构抗震方式明确,主体构件不发生塑性破坏,耗能支撑或耗能梁段通过塑性变形吸收地震能量,同时,通过装配式建造,耗能构件易于更换,达到结构韧性抗震的目标.提出评价高强钢组合偏心支撑...     

高强钢组合K形偏心支撑框架结构振动台试验研究

为研究高强钢组合K形偏心支撑框架的抗震性能,推动高强钢在我国建筑领域的应用,对一个单跨两榀三层高强钢组合K形偏心支撑钢框架进行缩尺比例为1/2的振动台试验,得到不同工况下的自振频率、阻尼比、加速度反应、位移反应及耗能梁段的应变。研究表明：随地震波峰值加速度的增大,结构的自振频率降低,阻尼比增大,加速度反应增大,动力放大系数减小。按照动力相似关系推导出原型结构的地震反应,多遇地震作用下结构最大层间位移角为1/1667,罕遇地震作用下结构最大层间位移角为1/237,均满足抗震规范变形验算的规定。综上,高强钢组合K形偏心支撑框架具有良好的抗震性能,满足“三水准”抗震设防准则。     

耗能梁段长度对K形偏心支撑钢框架抗震性能的影响

分析了K形偏心支撑钢框架中耗能梁段的受力特性,利用非线性有限元程序探讨了耗能梁段长度对K形偏心支撑钢框架刚度、延性及耗能性能的影响,提出了初步设计时耗能梁段长度的取值范围.     

耗能梁段长度对K形偏心支撑钢框架抗震性能的影响

分析了K形偏心支撑钢框架中耗能梁段的受力特性,利用非线性有限元程序探讨了耗能梁段长度对K形偏心支撑钢框架刚度、延性及耗能性能的影响,提出了初步设计时耗能梁段长度的取值范围。     

高强钢组合K形偏心支撑钢框架抗震性能试验研究

高强钢组合偏心支撑钢框架是一种耗能梁段采用屈服点较低的钢材(Q235,Q345),其他构件采用高强度钢材(Q460,Q690)的新型结构体系。为研究其抗震性能,对4个1∶2缩尺的单层单跨高强钢组合K形偏心支撑钢框架平面试件进行了单调加载试验和循环加载试验。试验以耗能梁段长度为变化参数,研究试件的破坏模式和主要抗震性能指标。研究结果表明,高强钢组合K形偏心支撑钢框架的承载力高、延性较好、耗能能力强;剪切屈服型试件的耗能能力好于弯曲屈服型;单调加载的破坏位移远比循环加载的大,前者的承载力高于后者,但相同位移时前者的荷载低于后者;循环荷载作用下试件破坏主要集中在第一道抗震防线耗能梁段上,此时高强钢构件基本处于弹性工作状态,残余变形较小;高强钢组合K形偏心支撑钢框架是一种有利于震后修复的双重抗侧力体系。     

Y型偏心支撑钢框架受力性能有限元分析

建立了四种Y型偏心支撑钢框架有限元模型,对平面模型框架和三种空间模型框架进行了单向加载和循环加载试验,并对比分析了模型框架的屈服强度、极限承载力、侧向刚度、延性和耗能能力等方面的受力性能差异,得到的结果为工程设计提供了参考。     

Seismic performance of Y‐type eccentrically braced frames combined with high‐strength steel based on performance‐based seismic design

In the Y‐type eccentrically braced frame structures, the links as fuses are generally located outside the beams; the links can be easily repairable or replaceable after earthquake without obvious damage in the slab and beam. The non‐dissipative member (beams, braces, and columns) in the Y‐type eccentrically braced frames are overestimated designed to ensure adequate plastic deformation of links with dissipating sufficient energy. However, the traditionally code design not only wastes steel but also limits the application of eccentrically braced frames. In this paper, Y‐type eccentrically braced steel frames with high‐strength steel is proposed; links and braces are fabricated with Q345 steel (the nominal yield stress is 345 MPa); the beams and columns are fabricated with high‐strength steel. The usage of high‐strength steel effectively decreases the cross sections of structural members as well as reduces the construction cost. The performance‐based seismic design of eccentrically braced frames was proposed to achieve the ideal failure mode and the same objective. Based on this method, four groups Y‐type eccentrically braced frames of 5‐story, 10‐story, 15‐story, and 20‐story models with ideal failure modes were designed, and each group includes Y‐type eccentrically braced frames with ordinary steel and Y‐type eccentrically braced frames with high‐strength steel. Nonlinear pushover and nonlinear dynamic analyses were performed on all prototypes, and the near‐fault and far‐fault ground motions are considered. The bearing capacity, lateral stiffness, story drift, link rotations, and failure modes were compared. The results indicated that Y‐type eccentrically braced frames with high‐strength steel have a similar bearing capacity to ordinary steel; however, the lateral stiffness of Y‐type eccentrically braced frames with high‐strength steel is smaller. Similar failure modes and story drift distribution of the prototype structures designed using the performance‐based seismic design method are performed under rare earthquake conditions.     

Fundamental periods of steel eccentrically braced frames

This paper describes formulation of a hand method that can be used to estimate the computed fundamental periods of vibration of building structures in general and steel eccentrically braced frames (EBFs) in particular. The developed method uses the Rayleigh's method as a basis and utilizes the roof drift ratio (RD_R) under seismic forces as a parameter. To obtain RD_R, more than 4000 EBFs were designed by considering the seismic hazard, number of stories, braced bay width and link length to bay width ratio as prime variables. A model was developed to estimate RD_R, which depends on the rigid plastic deformation mechanism for a typical EBF. The method was verified using design data produced as a part of this work as well as data published in literature. The verifications indicate that the proposed formulation is capable of providing acceptable estimates of the computed period. When compared with existing empirical period–height relationships, the proposed formulation offers closer estimates with reduced scatter. The method was further refined to derive new period–height relationships for two different seismicity regions. The accuracy of the relationship for high seismic regions was verified using measured periods of EBF buildings. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Seismic testing and numerical analysis of Y‐shaped eccentrically braced frame made of high‐strength steel

In eccentrically braced frame made of high‐strength steel (HSS‐EBF), link and brace are made from conventional steel whereas other structural members use high‐strength steel. Using HSS for beams and columns in EBF can reduce steel consumption and increase economic efficiency. In this paper, one shake table test of a 1:2 scaled three‐story Y‐shaped HSS‐EBF (Y‐HSS‐EBF) specimen was carried out to study its seismic behavior underground motions with different peak ground accelerations. The dynamic properties, base shear force, displacement, and strain responses of the specimen were obtained from this test. In addition, the finite element models of two 10‐story Y‐HSS‐EBF buildings and one 10‐story conventional Y‐EBF building were evaluated for seismic effects. Nonlinear pushover and dynamic analyses were conducted to compare their seismic performance and economy. The results indicated that the specimen exhibited sufficient lateral stiffness and safety but suffered some localized damages. During the high seismic intensity earthquakes, the links of the test specimen were in inelastic to dissipate the earthquake energy, whereas other structural members remained in the elastic state. Under the same design conditions, Y‐HSS‐EBF used less steel than that of conventional Y‐EBF, which could reduce the amount of steel used in Y‐HSS‐EBF. The Y‐HSS‐EBF is a safe, dual system with reliable seismic performance.     

两种偏心支撑钢框架受力性能对比分析

建立了空间Y型与K型偏心支撑钢框架有限元模型,对两种模型框架进行了单向加载和循环加载试验,对比分析了两种空间偏心支撑框架的屈服强度、极限承载力、侧向刚度、延性和耗能能力等方面受力性能的差异,为工程设计提供参考。     

3种偏心支撑钢框架的塑性设计方法

偏心支撑钢框架是在中心支撑钢框架的基础上发展起来的一种新型结构体系,它能够有效改善钢框架在大震作用下的抗震性能。本文基于已有耗能梁段的塑性设计模型,考虑钢材的应变硬化效应影响,提出了一种改进的偏心支撑耗能梁段塑性模型,并基于此模型对不同形式的偏心支撑钢框架在弯矩、剪力共同作用下的屈服模型进行了研究,推导出其塑性设计公式。