Phase II study of the effectiveness and safety of trastuzumab and paclitaxel for taxane‐ and trastuzumab‐naïve patients with HER2‐positive,previously treated,advanced, or recurrent gastric cancer (JFMC45‐1102)

Paclitaxel is a standard second‐line gastric cancer treatment in Japan. Trastuzumab could be active as second‐line chemotherapy for taxane/trastuzumab‐naïve patients with epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)‐positive advanced gastric cancer. Patients aged ≥20 years with HER2‐positive, previously treated (except for trastuzumab and taxane), unresectable or recurrent gastric adenocarcinoma underwent combined trastuzumab (first and subsequent doses of 8 and 6 mg kg^?1, respectively, every 3 weeks) and paclitaxel (days 1, 8, 15, every 4 weeks) treatment. Study endpoints were best overall response, progression‐free survival, overall survival, and safety. From September 2011 to March 2012, 47 Japanese patients were enrolled. Forty patients discontinued treatment after a median of 128.5 (range 4–486) days. Complete and partial responses were obtained in one and 16 patients (response rate of 37% [95% CI 23–52]), respectively. Median progression‐free survival and overall survival were 5.1 (95% CI 3.8–6.5) and 17.1 (95% CI 13.5–18.6) months, respectively. Grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (32.6%), leukopenia (17.4%), anemia (15.2%) and hypoalbuminemia (8.7%). There was no clinically significant cardiotoxicity or cumulative toxicity. Three (disturbed consciousness, pulmonary fibrosis, and rapid disease progression) grade 5 events occurred. In conclusion, trastuzumab combined with paclitaxel was well tolerated and was a promising regimen for patients with HER2‐positive, previously treated, advanced or recurrent gastric cancer.     

A phase II study of gemcitabine plus paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer and prior anthracycline treatment

Aim: To investigate the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine‐paclitaxel in Chinese patients with metastatic breast cancer following anthracycline failure in a multicenter, open‐label, single‐arm, phase II clinical trial. Methods: Chinese female patients with unresectable, locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer who had relapsed after neo‐adjuvant anthracycline‐based chemotherapy were included. All patients had measurable disease and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 at baseline. Gemcitabine (1250 mg/m²)‐paclitaxel (175 mg/m²) was administered on a 3‐weekly schedule until disease progression, and patients were followed up for 12 months (post‐enrolment). The primary end point was objective response rate; secondary end points included duration of response, progression‐free survival and overall survival. Results: Overall 60 patients were enrolled. Their mean age was 46.9 (SD ± 9.0) years and 90% of patients had metastatic disease. All patients had previously received chemotherapy. A total of 48 patients (80%) completed the 12‐month follow up, and 40 patients (67%) completed at least six cycles of study therapy. The objective response rate (complete response + partial response) was 50% (95% CI: 36.6–63.4). Median duration of response was 5.6 months (95% CI: 4.4–7.6) and median progression‐free survival was 7.6 months (95% CI: 5.8–8.8). Overall survival at 12 months was 87% (95% CI: 77.9–95.2). Laboratory toxicities were primarily hematologic, including Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia (n = 27 [45%]) and leukopenia (n = 18 [30%]). Eight patient deaths (13%) were not treatment‐related. Conclusion: Gemcitabine‐paclitaxel combination therapy is an active and well‐tolerated chemotherapy regimen, with expected and manageable toxicity in Chinese patients with metastatic breast cancer.     

Overall survival benefits for irinotecan‐containing regimens as first‐line treatment for advanced gastric cancer: An updated meta‐analysis of ten randomized controlled trials

The standard treatment for patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) is still debated, and the available data on the benefit of irinotecan‐containing regimen as first‐line treatment for those patients are controversial. We performed a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials to determine the survival benefits of irinotecan‐containing regimens in this setting. A total of 1,837 patients from ten trials were included in the analysis. Our results showed that irinotecan‐containing regimens significantly improved overall survival [OS: hazard ratio (HR) 0.86, 95% CI = 0.78–0.94, p = 0.002] and progression‐free survival [HR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.69–0.97, p = 0.026); however, the improvement of time to failure (HR = 0.90; 95% CI = 0.77–1.04, p = 0.15), 1‐year survival rate [1‐year SR: relative risk (RR) 1.10, 95% CI = 0.97–1.24, p = 0.13] and overall response rate (RR = 1.16, 95% CI = 0.91–1.49, p = 0.24] were nonsignificant. Equivalent frequencies of toxicities were found between the two groups excluding more Grade 3 or 4 fatigue (p = 0.001) in irinotecan‐containing regimens. This updated meta‐analysis provided strong evidence for a survival benefit of irinotecan‐containing regimen as first‐line treatment for AGC. A clear advantage of irinotecan‐containing over nonirinotecan‐containing regimen had not been established. These results should help to inform decisions about patient management and design of future trials.     

Long‐term results of concurrent chemoradiotherapy using cisplatin and vinorelbine for stage III non‐small‐cell lung cancer

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy is the standard treatment for unresectable stage III non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The long‐term feasibility and efficacy of vinorelbine and cisplatin with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy were investigated. Eighteen patients received cisplatin (80 mg/m²) on day 1 and vinorelbine (20 mg/m² in level 1, and 25 mg/m² in level 2) on days 1 and 8 every 4 weeks for four cycles in a phase I trial. Ninety‐three patients received the same chemotherapy regimen except for the fixed vinorelbine (20 mg/m²) dosage and consolidation therapy with docetaxel (60 mg/m², every 3 weeks). The thoracic radiotherapy consisted of a single dose of 2 Gy once daily to a total dose of 60 Gy. A total of 111 patients were analyzed in the present study: male/female, 91/20; median age, 60 years; stage IIIA/IIIB, 50/61; and squamous/non‐squamous histology, 26/85. The 3‐, 5‐, and 7‐year overall survival rates (95% CI) were 43.2% (33.9–52.2), 25.2% (17.6–33.5), and 23.2% (15.8–31.4), respectively. The median progression‐free survival and median survival time (95% CI) were 13.5 (10.1–16.7) months and 30.0 (24.3–38.8) months, respectively. Four patients (4%) experienced Grade 5 pulmonary toxicities from 4.4 to 9.4 months after the start of treatment. In conclusion, approximately 15% of patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC could be cured with chemoradiotherapy without severe late toxicities after 10 months of follow‐up. Although based on the data from highly selected population participated in phase I and phase II trial, this analysis would strengthen and confirm the previous reports concerning concurrent chemoradiotherapy with third generation cytotoxic agents. (Cancer Sci 2013; 104: 93–97)     

Randomized phase II study of nab‐paclitaxel as first‐line chemotherapy in patients with HER2‐negative metastatic breast cancer

Weekly administration of nanoparticle albumin‐bound paclitaxel (nab‐paclitaxel) has been shown to be a safe and effective treatment for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in clinical studies. We conducted a multicenter, randomized, open‐label phase II study to compare the efficacy and safety of weekly nab‐paclitaxel and docetaxel in Japanese patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2‐negative MBC. The primary endpoint was progression‐free survival (PFS). Patients were randomized to receive nab‐paclitaxel (150 mg/m² nab‐paclitaxel once per week for 3 of 4 weeks; n = 100) or docetaxel (75 mg/m² docetaxel every 3 weeks; n = 100). The median PFS by independent radiologist assessment was 9.8 months (90% confidence interval [CI]: 8.5–11.2) for nab‐paclitaxel and 11.2 months (90% CI: 8.4–13.8) for docetaxel (hazard ratio: 1.25, P = 0.363), and the median overall survival was 42.4 months and 34.0 months, respectively. The overall response rate was 56.1% for nab‐paclitaxel and 52.5% for docetaxel. Adverse events in both treatment arms were similar to previous reports. Neutropenia was the most common adverse event in both arms, with 35.0% of patients in the nab‐paclitaxel arm and 89.0% in the docetaxel arm experiencing grade 4 neutropenia. Grade 3 peripheral sensory neuropathy occurred in 22.0% of patients in the nab‐paclitaxel and 5.0% in the docetaxel arm. In this study, although weekly nab‐paclitaxel 150 mg/m² did not show superiority in PFS compared with docetaxel, efficacy outcomes were similar in patients treated with weekly nab‐paclitaxel and docetaxel.     

Survival benefit from S‐1 as compared to Fluorouracil in Asian patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer: A meta‐analysis

Whether S‐1 could replace 5‐Fluorouracil (5‐Fu) or not in the treatment of advanced gastrointestinal (GI) cancer (including advanced gastric cancer [AGS] and metastatic colorectal cancer [mCRC]) in Asian patients has been controversial. This meta‐analysis was performed to compare the activity, efficacy and toxicity of S‐1‐based versus 5‐Fu‐based chemotherapy in those Asian patients. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified by electronic search of Pubmed. Relevant abstracts were manually searched to identify relevant trials. A total of 2182 patients from eight RCTs were included, and our results demonstrated that S‐1‐based chemotherapy significantly improved overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77–1.00) and overall response rate (ORR) (odds ratio [OR], 1.72; 95% CI, 1.09–2.70), but no significant progression‐free survival (PFS) benefit was found between arms (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.72–1.06). Subgroup analyses revealed that S‐1‐based chemotherapy significantly improved OS and ORR in subgroups of patients with non‐platinum containing regimens (P = 0.041; P = 0.034) and patients with no prior chemotherapy history (P = 0.025; P = 0.016). Statistically significant improvements of PFS and ORR in the S‐1‐based chemotherapy were observed in the subgroup of patients with AGC (P < 0.001; P = 0.005). S‐1‐based chemotherapy was characterized by significantly higher incidences of diarrhea, fatigue and thrombocytopenia, and a lower incidence of nausea. This analysis provided strong evidence for survival benefits of S‐1, and S‐1‐based chemotherapy could be considered to replace 5‐Fu‐based therapy for the treatment of advanced GI cancer in Asian patients.     

Overall survival and final efficacy and safety results from a Japanese phase II study of axitinib in cytokine‐refractory metastatic renal cell carcinoma

In an open‐label, multicenter phase II study of Japanese patients with cytokine‐refractory metastatic renal cell carcinoma, axitinib showed substantial antitumor activity with an acceptable safety profile. Here, we report overall survival and updated efficacy and safety results. Sixty‐four Japanese patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma following prior therapy with cytokines were treated with axitinib at a starting dose of 5 mg b.i.d. Following median treatment duration of 14.2 months, median overall survival was 37.3 months (95% CI, 28.6–49.9). The objective response rate, the primary endpoint of the study, was 51.6% (95% CI, 38.7–64.2); the median duration of response, 11.1 months (95% CI, 8.2–13.7); and the median progression‐free survival was 11.0 months (95% CI, 9.2–12.0), assessed by the independent review committee. Common treatment‐related all‐grade adverse events were hypertension (88%), hand‐foot syndrome (75%), diarrhea (66%), proteinuria (63%), fatigue (55%) and dysphonia (53%). In an exploratory analysis, median overall survival was found to be significantly longer in patients who had greater decreases in plasma levels of soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor‐2 during the first cycle of treatment. In conclusion, the present study showed axitinib to be effective, and toxicities with long‐term treatment were generally controllable with axitinib dose modification and/or standard medications in these Japanese patients. Some frequently reported adverse events warrant close monitoring and management. Changes in the plasma levels of soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor‐2 may be used as a prognostic factor for overall survival in metastatic renal cell carcinoma following axitinib treatment. This study is registered at ClinicalTrial.gov (identifier NCT00569946).     

Phase II study of zoledronic acid combined with docetaxel for non‐small‐cell lung cancer: West Japan Oncology Group

The aim of this open‐label, multicenter, randomized phase II trial was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of zoledronic acid in combination with docetaxel in previously treated patients with non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and bone metastases. In this study, patients randomly received docetaxel (60 mg/m²) with (group DZ) or without (group D) zoledronic acid every 21 days. There were 50 patients in each group, and the primary endpoint was progression‐free survival. In an efficacy analysis of 94 patients (DZ, 48; D, 46), the median progression‐free survival was 2.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5–3.5 months) for the DZ group and 2.6 months (95% CI, 1.5–3.4 months) for the D group (stratified log‐rank test, P = 0.89). The median overall survival was 10.4 months (95% CI, 7.0–15.8 months) for the DZ group and 9.7 months (95% CI, 6.1–12.5 months) for the D group (stratified log‐rank test, P = 0.62). There were no clinically relevant differences in the frequencies of grade 3 or 4 adverse events between the two groups. No treatment‐related deaths occurred in the DZ group. Zoledronic acid combined with docetaxel was well tolerated but did not meet the primary endpoint of demonstrating a longer progression‐free survival in advanced NSCLC patients with bone metastases compared with docetaxel alone. This trial was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN000001098).     

Final safety and efficacy of erlotinib in the phase 4 POLARSTAR surveillance study of 10 708 Japanese patients with non‐small‐cell lung cancer

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) occurrence and risk factors were investigated in the Japanese non‐small‐cell lung cancer, post‐marketing, large‐scale surveillance study, POLARSTAR. All patients with unresectable, recurrent/advanced non‐small‐cell lung cancer who were treated with erlotinib in Japan between December 2007 and October 2009 were enrolled. Primary endpoints were patterns of ILD and risk factors for onset of ILD and ILD‐related death. Overall survival, progression‐free survival, and occurrence of adverse drug reactions were secondary endpoints. Interstitial lung disease was confirmed in 429 (4.3%) patients. Concurrent/previous ILD (hazard ratio, 3.19), emphysema or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (hazard ratio, 1.86), lung infection (hazard ratio, 1.55), smoking history (hazard ratio, 2.23), and period from initial cancer diagnosis to the start of treatment (<360 days; hazard ratio, 0.58) were identified as significant risk factors for developing ILD by Cox multivariate analysis. Logistic regression analysis identified Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 2–4 (odds ratio, 2.45 [95% confidence interval, 1.41–4.27]; P = 0.0016), ≤50% remaining normal lung area (odds ratio, 3.12 [1.48–6.58]; P = 0.0029), and concomitant honeycombing with interstitial pneumonia (odds ratio, 6.67 [1.35–32.94]; P = 0.02) as poor prognostic factors for ILD death. Median overall survival was 277 days; median progression‐free survival was 67 days. These data confirm the well‐characterized safety profile of erlotinib. Interstitial lung disease is still an adverse drug reaction of interest in this population, and these results, including ILD risk factors, give helpful information for treatment selection and monitoring. Erlotinib efficacy was additionally confirmed in this population. (POLARSTAR trial ML21590.)     

Phase II study of FOLFIRINOX for chemotherapy‐naïve Japanese patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer

The FOLFIRINOX combination of chemotherapy drugs had not been fully evaluated for Japanese pancreatic cancer patients. Therefore, we carried out a phase II study to examine the efficacy and safety of FOLFIRINOX in chemotherapy‐naïve Japanese patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. FOLFIRINOX (i.v. infusion of 85 mg/m² oxaliplatin, 180 mg/m² irinotecan, and 200 mg/m² l‐leucovorin, followed by a bolus of 400 mg/m² fluorouracil and a 46‐h continuous infusion of 2400 mg/m² fluorouracil) was given every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was the response rate. The 36 enrolled patients received a median of eight (range, 1–25) treatment cycles. The response rate was 38.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 23.1–56.5); median overall survival, 10.7 months (95% CI, 6.9–13.2); and median progression‐free survival, 5.6 months (95% CI, 3.0–7.8). Major grade 3 or 4 toxicities included neutropenia (77.8%), febrile neutropenia (22.2%), thrombocytopenia (11.1%), anemia (11.1%), anorexia (11.1%), diarrhea (8.3%), nausea (8.3%), elevated alanine aminotransferase levels (8.3%), and peripheral sensory neuropathy (5.6%). Febrile neutropenia occurred only during the first cycle. There were no treatment‐related deaths. FOLFIRINOX can be a standard regimen showing favorable efficacy and acceptable toxicity profile in chemotherapy‐naïve Japanese patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.     

Phase II study of nab‐paclitaxel + carboplatin for patients with non‐small‐cell lung cancer and interstitial lung disease

The prognosis of non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) is poor, and 5%‐20% of those receiving chemotherapy experience ILD exacerbation. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of nab‐paclitaxel plus carboplatin for NSCLC patients with ILD, we undertook a multicenter phase II study. Chemotherapy‐naïve patients with advanced NSCLC and mild or moderate ILD received nab‐paclitaxel (100 mg/m², days 1, 8, and 15) plus carboplatin (area under the curve = 6, day 1) every 3 weeks for 4 cycles (maximum, 6 cycles). Interstitial lung diseases were diagnosed based on criteria for fibrosing interstitial pneumonia. The primary endpoint was the prevalence of exacerbation‐free ILD 28 days after completion of protocol treatment. Secondary endpoints were response rate, progression‐free survival, overall survival, prevalence of exacerbation‐free ILD, and toxicity. Ninety‐four patients were enrolled, and 92 patients received any protocol treatment. Median age was 70 years, and 58% had nonsquamous histology. In the primary analysis, the prevalence of exacerbation‐free ILD 28 days after protocol treatment was 95.7% (88/92; 90% confidence interval, 90.3‐98.5), which met the primary endpoint. Response rate was 51% (95% confidence interval, 40%‐62%). At the time of data cut‐off, median progression‐free survival was 6.2 months, and median overall survival was 15.4 months. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (75%), leukopenia (53%), anemia (48%), and thrombocytopenia (20%). Two treatment‐related deaths (1 each of pulmonary infection and ILD exacerbation) were observed. This study showed that a combination of nab‐paclitaxel with carboplatin was tolerable in NSCLC patients with mild or moderate ILD in terms of safety. This study is registered at the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) Clinical Trial Registry (UMIN 000012989).     

Delayed platelet recovery after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Association with chronic graft‐versus‐host disease and survival outcome

Delayed platelet recovery (DPR) despite prompt neutrophil engraftment is frequently observed after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). However, few studies have evaluated the risk factors and long‐term outcome. Therefore, we retrospectively analysed 219 adult patients who underwent their first allogenic HSCT with neutrophil engraftment. Of these 219 patients, 50 (22.8%) had DPR that was defined as relapse‐free survival at day 60 after HSCT without primary platelet recovery despite neutrophil engraftment. The results of a multivariate analysis showed that a high‐risk underlying disease (odds ratio [OR], 2.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04‐5.48; P = .041) and human leukocyte antigen–mismatched HSCT (OR, 2.63; 95% CI, 1.28‐5.43; P = .009) were associated with an increased risk of DPR. In univariate analyses, the occurrence of DPR was significantly associated with inferior overall survival, high nonrelapse mortality, and a low incidence of chronic graft‐versus‐host disease (GVHD), despite a comparable relapse rate. In multivariate analyses, DPR was associated with inferior overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 2.00; 95% CI, 1.23‐3.27; P = .005) and a low incidence of chronic GVHD (HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.22‐0.78; P = .002). In conclusion, DPR was a strong predictor of shorter survival but also less frequent chronic GVHD.     

Correlation between sex and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (PD‐1 and CTLA‐4 inhibitors)

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) exert the antitumor efficacy depending on immune response, which is affected by sex difference, where both biological and sociological factors are involved. The role of sex in ICI trials has been overlooked. How sex correlates with ICI efficacy is incompletely understood. Clinical trials evaluating ICI versus other therapies in male and female patients were included. The hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of overall survival (OS) and progression‐free survival (PFS) were used. Six thousand and ninety‐six patients from 11 trials were included. More improvement of OS was observed in males (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.53–0.71; p < 0.001) treated with ICI versus controls than females (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.65–0.84; p < 0.001). ICIs improved PFS more in males (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.43–0.71; p < 0.001) than females (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.52–0.91; p < 0.001). The sex difference had more effect on the overall survival in melanoma patients versus NSCLC patients. Overall survival of patients treated with CTLA‐4 inhibitor was more influenced by sex variable compared with PD‐1 inhibitors. A significant sex‐related efficacy difference was observed between female and male melanoma patients. Although male patients had longer OS and PFS than females when treated with ICIs versus controls, the difference was not significant. Sex difference should be more considered in future clinical trials, guidelines and clinical practice.     

A phase II study of docetaxel and oxaliplatin combination in recurrent gastric cancer patients after fluoropyrimidine and/or cisplatin adjuvant treatment: a Korean Cancer Study Group Protocol ST06-02

Background

Surgery alone is no longer an adequate standard of care for patients with resectable gastric cancer. Thus, research efforts should focus on which regimens are the most effective for patients with recurrent gastric cancer after combined treatment with surgery and perioperative or adjuvant chemotherapy.

Methods

Patients with histologically confirmed and measurable advanced gastric cancer who showed a relapse even after fluoropyrimidine and/or cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy received docetaxel (35?mg/m²) intravenously on day 1 and 8 plus oxaliplatin (100?mg/m²) intravenously on day 1 every 3?weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Results

A total of 34 patients with relapsed advanced gastric cancer who had received adjuvant chemotherapy with fluoropyrimidine and/or cisplatin for a median of 6?months (range, 1–48?months) were enrolled in this trial; 22 (64.7?%) patients had been exposed to both agents. Their median age was 58?years (range, 50–68?years). The overall response rate was 55.9?% (95?% confidence interval (CI), 38.3–73.5?%), including 1 complete response and 18 partial responses. At a median follow-up duration of 28.5?months (range, 9.2–50.7?months), the median progression-free survival for all patients was 5.3?months (95?% CI, 4.4–6.1?months) and the median overall survival was 13.8?months (95?% CI, 11.1–16.4?months). The most common grade 3 or 4 hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities were neutropenia (47.1?%) and diarrhea (17.6?%), respectively. Five patients (14.7?%) experienced febrile neutropenia.

Conclusions

Docetaxel and oxaliplatin combination chemotherapy was active and tolerable in patients with recurrent gastric cancer after fluoropyrimidine and/or cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy.     

The clinical value of combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer patients: A meta‐analysis of efficacy and safety

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in combination therapy is an emerging trend in tumor immunology. However, the value of combination immunotherapy remains controversial, because of the toxic effects induced by combination. The added benefit of each additional drug has not been assessed against the added toxicity. We searched for clinical trials that evaluated ICI monotherapies and combination therapies in lung cancer and melanoma patients. The overall response rate (ORR), grade 3/4 treatment‐related adverse event rate, overall survival (OS), and progression‐free survival (PFS) were extracted from the most recently published studies to determine the relative risk (RR), hazard ratios (HRs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Seven randomized controlled trials and one open‐label study were identified (n = 3,097). Treatments included combinations of several ICIs, a combination of an ICI and dacarbazine, two combinations of an ICI, paclitaxel and carboplatin, and a combination of an ICI and gp100 vaccine. Higher ORR (RR: 1.51, 95% CI: 1.03–2.20, p = 0.034), OS (HR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.78–0.95, p = 0.000), and PFS (HR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.72–1.14, p = 0.000) values were observed in combination therapy than in monotherapy. In addition, the toxicity of combination ICI immunotherapy was higher (RR: 1.50, 95% CI: 1.03–2.19, p = 0.036) than that of monotherapy. This meta‐analysis showed that the addition of nivolumab to ipilimumab better benefits PFS and ORR. Adding sargramostim was associated with better OS and safety. The efficacy and safety of a nivolumab‐ipilimumab‐sargramostim combination should be investigated further.     

A Phase II Study of Amrubicin as a Third‐Line or Fourth‐Line Chemotherapy for Patients With Non‐Small Cell Lung Cancer: Hokkaido Lung Cancer Clinical Study Group Trial (HOT) 0901

Amrubicin, a third‐generation synthetic anthracycline agent, has favorable clinical activity and acceptable toxicity for the treatment of patients with non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small cell lung cancer. We conducted this study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of amrubicin for advanced NSCLC patients as a third‐ or fourth‐line therapy. Eligible patients had recurrent or refractory advanced NSCLC after second‐ or third‐line therapy. Patients received amrubicin, 35 mg/m² i.v. on days 1–3 every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was the disease control rate (DCR). Secondary endpoints were the overall survival (OS) time, progression‐free survival (PFS) time, response rate, and toxicity profile. Of the 41 patients enrolled, 26 received amrubicin as a third‐line and 15 received it as a fourth‐line therapy. The median number of treatment cycles was two (range, 1–9). Objective responses were complete response (n = 0), partial response (n = 4), stable disease (n = 21), progressive disease (n = 15), and not evaluable (n = 1), resulting in a DCR of 61.0% (95% confidence interval, 46.0%–75.9%). The overall response rate was 9.8% (95% confidence interval, 0.6%–18.8%). The median PFS interval was 3.0 months, median OS time was 12.6 months, and 1‐year survival rate was 53.7%. Grade 3 or 4 hematological toxicities were neutropenia (68%), anemia (12%), thrombocytopenia (12%), and febrile neutropenia (17%). Nonhematological toxicities were mild and reversible. No treatment‐related deaths were observed. Amrubicin showed significant clinical activity with manageable toxicities as a third‐ or fourth‐line therapy for patients with advanced NSCLC. This study provides relevant data for routine practice and future prospective trials evaluating third‐ or fourth‐line treatment strategies for patients with advanced NSCLC.     

Response and survival benefit with chemoimmunotherapy in Epstein‐Barr virus‐positive diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma

Epstein‐Barr virus (EBV)‐positive diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a haematologic malignancy with poor prognosis when treated with chemotherapy. We evaluated response and survival benefits of chemoimmunotherapy in EBV‐positive DLBCL patients. A total of 117 DLBCL patients were included in our retrospective analysis; 33 were EBV‐positive (17 treated with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone [R‐CHOP] and 16 with CHOP), and 84 were EBV‐negative (all treated with R‐CHOP). The outcomes of interest were complete response (CR) and overall survival (OS) in EBV‐positive DLBCL patients (R‐CHOP versus CHOP) and in DLBCL patients treated with R‐CHOP (EBV‐positive vs EBV‐negative). There were no differences in the clinical characteristics between EBV‐positive and EBV‐negative DLBCL patients. Among EBV‐positive DLBCL patients, R‐CHOP was associated with higher odds of CR (OR 3.14, 95% CI 0.75‐13.2; P = .10) and better OS (hazard ratio 0.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.09‐0.94; P = .04). There were no differences in CR rate (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.18‐1.56; P = .25) or OS (hazard ratio 0.93, 95% CI 0.32‐2.67; P = .89) between EBV‐positive and EBV‐negative DLBCL patients treated with R‐CHOP. Based on our study, the addition of rituximab to CHOP is associated with improved response and survival in EBV‐positive DLBCL patients. Epstein‐Barr virus status does not seem to affect response or survival in DLBCL patients treated with R‐CHOP.     

Phase II trial of biweekly cetuximab and irinotecan as third‐line therapy for pretreated KRAS exon 2 wild‐type colorectal cancer

Efficacy and safety of biweekly cetuximab plus irinotecan were evaluated to provide guidance for its use in Japan as third‐line treatment for pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients harboring wild‐type KRAS exon 2. Objective response rate (ORR) was used as primary endpoint based on an expected proportion of 0.23 with confidence width of 0.298 (95% CI, 0.105‐0.403), which showed 35 to be the minimal participant number. Forty patients, refractory to first‐ and second‐line chemotherapy containing irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and fluoropyrimidine, were enrolled. ORR and disease control rate were 25.0% (95% CI: 11.5‐38.4) and 72.5% (95% CI: 56.8‐86.4), respectively. Median progression‐free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and number of courses were 5.70 months (95% CI: 2.7‐7.9), 15.1 months (95% CI: 11.8‐19.0), and 10.5 (range: 3.0‐31.0), respectively. Grade 3 adverse events were skin toxicity (12.5%), diarrhea (10.0%), neutropenia (5.0%), febrile neutropenia (5.0%), nausea (5.0%), anorexia (5.0%), and fatigue (2.5%). C_max mean was 723.2 μg/mL after first dose. High area under the curve (AUC)_last variance was associated with t_1/2 range of 131.2‐1209.6 hours (median, 174.4 hours). Early tumor shrinkage (ETS) and median depth of response were 25.0% and 13.0%, respectively. Mutation frequencies in KRAS exon 3 or 4, NRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA were 5.5%, 2.7%, 8.3%, and 5.5%, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression analysis assessed whether any gene mutations and ETS are predictors for PFS, and whether performance status, synchronous metastasis, and ETS are predictors for OS. Importantly, the data provide guidance for a biweekly cetuximab plus irinotecan regimen in mCRC patients.     

Afatinib versus cisplatin plus pemetrexed in Japanese patients with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer harboring activating EGFR mutations: Subgroup analysis of LUX‐Lung 3

In LUX‐Lung 3, afatinib significantly improved progression‐free survival (PFS) versus cisplatin/pemetrexed in EGFR mutation‐positive lung adenocarcinoma patients and overall survival (OS) in Del19 patients. Preplanned analyses in Japanese patients from LUX‐Lung 3 were performed. Patients were randomized 2:1 to afatinib or cisplatin/pemetrexed, stratified by mutation type (Del19/L858R/Other). Primary endpoint was PFS (independent review). Secondary endpoints included OS, objective response, and safety. Median PFS (data cut‐off: February 2012) for afatinib versus cisplatin/pemetrexed was 13.8 vs 6.9 months (hazard ratio [HR], 0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.20–0.70; P = 0.0014) in all Japanese patients (N = 83), with more pronounced improvements in those with common mutations (Del19/L858R; HR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.15–0.52; P < 0.0001) and Del19 mutations (HR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.06–0.39; P < 0.0001). PFS was also improved in L858R patients (HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.20–1.25; P = 0.1309). Median OS (data cut‐off: November 2013) with afatinib versus cisplatin/pemetrexed was 46.9 vs 35.8 months (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.40–1.43; P = 0.3791) in all Japanese patients, with greater benefit in patients with common mutations (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.29–1.12; P = 0.0966) and Del19 mutations (HR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.13–0.87; P = 0.0181); OS was not significantly different in L858R patients (HR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.40–3.21; P = 0.8212). Following study treatment discontinuation, most patients (93.5%) received subsequent anticancer therapy. The most common treatment‐related adverse events were diarrhea, rash/acne, nail effects and stomatitis with afatinib and nausea, decreased appetite, neutropenia, and leukopenia with cisplatin/pemetrexed. Afatinib significantly improved PFS versus cisplatin/pemetrexed in Japanese EGFR mutation‐positive lung adenocarcinoma patients and OS in Del19 but not L858R patients ( www.clinicaltrials.gov ; NCT00949650).     

Phase III, randomized, open-label, first-line study in Asia of gefitinib versus carboplatin/paclitaxel in clinically selected patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: evaluation of patients recruited from mainland China

Aim: In the IRESSA Pan‐Asia Study (IPASS), 1217 patients in East Asia with pulmonary adenocarcinoma who were never‐smokers or ex/light‐smokers received first‐line gefitinib (250 mg/day) or carboplatin/paclitaxel (area under the curve 5/6; 200 mg/m²). Efficacy analyses were pre‐planned in patients in China. Methods: In China, 372 patients (30.6% of the overall group) were randomized. The primary end‐point was progression‐free survival (PFS). Secondary end‐points were overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), health‐related quality of life (HRQoL), symptom improvement, safety and tolerability. Results: For patients in China, PFS did not significantly differ from the overall IPASS population (interaction test P= 0.427). PFS was numerically longer (hazard ratio [HR] 0.79; 95% CI 0.62–1.01; P= 0.065; median PFS 6.8 months for both treatments) and ORR significantly higher (ORR 44.6 vs 29.8%; odds ratio 1.88; 95% CI 1.22–2.89; P= 0.004) for gefitinib than carboplatin/paclitaxel. OS (mature data) was similar for both treatments (HR 0.92; 95% CI 0.73–1.17; P= 0.511; median OS gefitinib 18.1 months vs 18.3 months carboplatin/paclitaxel). HRQoL improvement rates favored gefitinib; symptom improvement rates were similar for both treatments. Gefitinib had a more favorable tolerability profile than carboplatin/paclitaxel. Efficacy by epidermal growth factor receptor biomarker status (exploratory analyses) was difficult to interpret due to low patient numbers with known biomarker status. Conclusion: For the Chinese subgroup of IPASS, gefitinib demonstrated improved PFS and ORR, similar OS, higher HRQoL, similar symptom improvement rates and a more favorable tolerability profile than carboplatin/paclitaxel, generally consistent with the overall IPASS population.