Detection of previously undiagnosed cases of COPD in a high-risk population identified in general practice

Abstract Background and Aim: Under-diagnosis of COPD is a widespread problem. This study aimed to identify previously undiagnosed cases of COPD in a high-risk population identified through general practice. Methods: Participating GPs (n = 241) recruited subjects with no previous diagnosis of lung disease, >35 yrs, and at least one respiratory symptom. Age, smoking status, pack-years, BMI, dyspnoea score (MRC), and pre-bronchodilator spirometry data was obtained. Subjects with airway obstruction (FEV(1)/FVC ≤ 0.7) at initial spirometry were tested for reversibility, according to Danish COPD guidelines, with bronchodilator and, if necessary, corticosteroids in order to confirm a diagnosis of COPD. Results: A total of 4.049 (49% females) subjects were included; mean age 58 yrs, BMI 27, and 32 pack-years. The COPD prevalence was 21.7%; 8.3% in subjects younger than 48?years. Most patients were classified in GOLD stages I and II (36% and 50%, respectively). The number needed to screen (NNS) for a new diagnosis of COPD was 4.6. COPD diagnosis was related to gender, age, BMI (p < 0.001), pack-years, and cough (p < 0.001), wheezing (p < 0.001) and sputum production (p = 0.002). A threshold of 10% pre-test risk of COPD would have reduced the number of spirometry tests by 35% although 90% of the patients with COPD would still have been identified (NNS 3.9). Conclusions: Of the at-risk subjects studied, 22% were diagnosed with COPD. A case-finding strategy providing questionnaire assessment and diagnostic spirometry to high-risk subjects in primary care, and therefore, identifies a large proportion of undiagnosed COPD patients, especially in the early stages of the disease.     

Detection of previously undiagnosed cases of COPD in a high-risk population identified in general practice

Abstract

Background and Aim: Under-diagnosis of COPD is a widespread problem. This study aimed to identify previously undiagnosed cases of COPD in a high-risk population identified through general practice. Methods: Participating GPs (n = 241) recruited subjects with no previous diagnosis of lung disease, >35 yrs, and at least one respiratory symptom. Age, smoking status, pack-years, BMI, dyspnoea score (MRC), and pre-bronchodilator spirometry data was obtained. Subjects with airway obstruction (FEV₁/FVC ≤ 0.7) at initial spirometry were tested for reversibility, according to Danish COPD guidelines, with bronchodilator and, if necessary, corticosteroids in order to confirm a diagnosis of COPD. Results: A total of 4.049 (49% females) subjects were included; mean age 58 yrs, BMI 27, and 32 pack-years. The COPD prevalence was 21.7%; 8.3% in subjects younger than 48 years. Most patients were classified in GOLD stages I and II (36% and 50%, respectively). The number needed to screen (NNS) for a new diagnosis of COPD was 4.6. COPD diagnosis was related to gender, age, BMI (p < 0.001), pack-years, and cough (p < 0.001), wheezing (p < 0.001) and sputum production (p = 0.002). A threshold of 10% pre-test risk of COPD would have reduced the number of spirometry tests by 35% although 90% of the patients with COPD would still have been identified (NNS 3.9). Conclusions: Of the at-risk subjects studied, 22% were diagnosed with COPD. A case-finding strategy providing questionnaire assessment and diagnostic spirometry to high-risk subjects in primary care, and therefore, identifies a large proportion of undiagnosed COPD patients, especially in the early stages of the disease.     

Underdiagnosis and undertreatment of COPD in primary care settings

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to improve the detection of COPD in a primary care setting and to evaluate the subsequent management of these patients by general practitioners. METHODOLOGY: A two-step protocol was followed: patients were screened for airway obstruction and their subsequent management status reviewed. Screening spirometry was performed in 56 primary care settings (23 hospitals and 33 general practices). Inclusion criteria for screening subjects were: (i) > or =40-year-old smokers (both current and past smokers) and/or (ii) > or =40-year-old patients with respiratory symptoms of chronic cough and sputum. Patients with a previously diagnosed respiratory disease were excluded. In the second part of the study, the diagnosis and the subsequent management status of subjects with airway obstructive changes (FEV1/FVC <70%) were sought from their physician using a questionnaire 2 months after detection. RESULTS: A total of 1168 patients were screened, with 128 not analysed because of incomplete data, leaving 1040 patients. The percentages of current smokers, ex-smokers, and non-smokers among all analysed subjects were 41.7%, 29.8% and 28.5%, respectively. Airway obstructive changes (FEV1/FVC <70%) were found in 27.0% (n = 281) of all analysed subjects. Questionnaires for 194 subjects (with positive screening tests) were sent back by the participating physicians. Eighty-one per cent (n = 158) of the 194 subjects had COPD and 13.4% (n = 26) had asthma. Sixty-one per cent (n = 96) of the subjects with moderate to severe COPD according to international guidelines (FEV1 <80% predicted). However, 31.3% (n = 30) did not receive any clinical intervention (smoking cessation advice and/or drug administration). CONCLUSIONS: Screening spirometry in outpatients in a primary care setting can identify many COPD patients. However, COPD management appears to be poor in Japan.     

Management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in primary care: a questionnaire survey in western Sweden.

AIM: To assess the primary care management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in relation to COPD guidelines. METHOD: A postal questionnaire was sent out to all Primary Health Care Centres (PHCCs) in western Sweden (n=232). The response rate was 75%. RESULTS: A majority of the PHCCs had a nurse and physician responsible for COPD care. They used spirometry equipment regularly, but only 50% reported that they calibrated it at least weekly. Less than 30% of the PHCCs reported access to a dietician, occupational therapist or physiotherapist. There was a structured smoking cessation program in 50% of the PHCCs. Larger PHCCs were more likely to use spirometry equipment regularly and to have specific personnel for COPD care. CONCLUSION: There is a need to establish structured programs for COPD care including smoking cessation programs for COPD patients with special trained staff. Larger PHCCs have a better infrastructure for providing guideline-defined COPD care.     

Diagnosis and Management of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) in a Primary Care Clinic

ABSTRACT

Chronic Obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States and internationally. The purpose of this study was to describe spirometry use in the diagnosis of COPD and to evaluate the management of COPD occurring in a primary care clinic. Methods: Two hundred patients with a diagnosis of COPD attending a university-based family medicine clinic were randomly chosen for a retrospective medical record review. Pulmonary function testing, provision of smoking cessation advice and pharmacological management were compared to the recommendations of the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease. Results: Mean age was 65.4 years, 48% were male and 72% were Caucasian. Overall, 58.5% (n = 117) of patients had pulmonary function testing, with 60.7% acknowledged in the outpatient record; 55% (n = 110) were receiving medications in combinations that are recommended; and 40% of patients were receiving stage appropriate medications. 67.8% of current smokers were offered smoking cessation advice or treatment. Conclusions: Overall there was low use of recommended medication combinations and stage appropriate treatment, with better observance of diagnostic and risk factor reduction guidelines. In order to improve COPD care for patients, physicians need education about the recommended stepwise treatment options and office systems that promote integration of pulmonary function testing findings into care.     

Controversies in the use of spirometry for early recognition and diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in cigarette smokers

Office spirometry used to detect COPD in smokers ages 44 and above with respiratory symptoms probably meets the criteria for a population-based screening test and for clinical case finding: If not detected early, COPD causes substantial morbidity or mortality, and smoking cessation is more effective when COPD is recognized before exertional dyspnea develops. Office spirometry is a feasible testing strategy and may be used to encourage smoking cessation efforts that change behavior in at least some patients. Office spirometry is relatively simple and affordable, is safe, and includes an action plan with minimal adverse effects. On the other hand, the false-positive and false-negative rates of office spirometry in the primary care setting may be higher than diagnostic spirometry performed during epidemiologic studies or in diagnostic pulmonary function laboratories, and the incremental benefit of office spirometry on smoking cessation rates is poorly established (when added to referral to an AHCPR-based smoking cessation program).     

COPD screening efforts in primary care: what is the yield?

INTRODUCTION: Underdiagnosis of COPD appears to be common, although the degree of underdiagnosis is rarely measured. To document the extent of underdiagnosis in a high risk group of ambulatory patients, we performed spirometry in smokers aged 40 years and over drawn from general practices in two countries. METHODS: Subjects were recruited from primary care practices in Aberdeen, Scotland, and Denver, Colorado, via random mailing. Current and former smokers aged 40 or older with no prior diagnosis of chronic obstructive respiratory disease (and no respiratory medications within the past year) were enrolled. Participants underwent pre- and post-bronchodilator spirometry. A study diagnosis of COPD was defined as post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC < 0.70. RESULTS Spirometric examination was complete in 818 patients, of whom 155 (18.9%) had a study diagnosis of COPD. Using the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) severity criteria, the COPD was mild in 57.4%, moderate in 36.8%, and severe in 5.8%. No patients had very severe disease according to GOLD criteria. DISCUSSION: Screening of smokers over 40 in general practice may yield 10 - 20% undiagnosed COPD cases, with a substantial proportion of these having moderate to severe disease. Earlier diagnosis through targeted case-finding will allow early, aggressive smoking cessation efforts and may lead to a reduction in the burden of COPD symptoms and a reduced impact of the disease on health-related quality of life in these patients.     

Diagnostic labeling of COPD in five Latin American cities

Background:COPD is a major worldwide problem with a rising prevalence. Despite its importance, there is a lack of information regarding underdiagnosis and misdiagnosis of COPD in different countries. As part of the Proyecto Latinoamericano de Investigación en Obstrucción Pulmonar study, we examined the relationship between prior diagnostic label and airway obstruction in the metropolitan areas of five Latin American cities (São Paulo, Santiago, Mexico City, Montevideo, and Caracas).Methods:A two-stage sampling strategy was used in each of the five areas to obtain probability samples of adults aged ≥ 40 years. Participants completed a questionnaire that included questions on prior diagnoses, and prebronchodilator and postbronchodilator spirometry. A study diagnosis of COPD was based on airway obstruction, defined as a postbronchodilator FEV₁/FVC < 0.70.Results:Valid spirometry and prior diagnosis information was obtained for 5,303 participants; 758 subjects had a study diagnosis of COPD, of which 672 cases (88.7%) had not been previously diagnosed. The prevalence of undiagnosed COPD was 12.7%, ranging from 6.9% in Mexico City to 18.2% in Montevideo. Among 237 subjects with a prior COPD diagnosis, only 86 subjects (36.3%) had postbronchodilator FEV₁/FVC < 0.7, while 151 subjects (63.7%) had normal spirometric values. In the same group of 237 subjects, only 34% reported ever undergoing spirometry prior to our study.Conclusions:Inaccurate diagnostic labeling of COPD represents an important health problem in Latin America. One possible explanation is the low rate of spirometry for COPD diagnosis.     

Implementation of a COPD Screening Questionnaire in an Outpatient HIV Clinic

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is associated with increased risk for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD); yet substantial under-recognition of COPD exists. We administered a patient-completed, physician-reviewed COPD screening tool in an outpatient HIV clinic to determine whether screening is feasible or possible. Patients attending nonacute, routine HIV care visits were provided a brief COPD screening tool, which included three questions focused on age, respiratory symptoms, and smoking history. Providers were given completed forms for review and ordered spirometry at their discretion. Forms and medical records were subsequently reviewed to determine completion and results of spirometry testing. Of the 1,510 patients screened during the study period, 968 (64%) forms were completed. After excluding 79 incomplete forms, 889 (92%) unique patient forms were included in this analysis. Among these, 204 (23%) met criteria for spirometry referral, among whom physicians ordered spirometry in 64 (31%). At 6 months following study completion, 19 (30%) of the patients referred for spirometry had the test completed, with 5 (26%) demonstrating airflow obstruction. Nearly one out of four HIV patients met indication for screening spirometry and roughly one out of four undergoing spirometry had COPD. Critical drop-offs in the screening and diagnostic process occurred at questionnaire completion and spirometry ordering. Interventions tailored to these critical steps could improve the yield from COPD screening and help to optimize the identification of COPD in high-risk HIV-infected populations. COPD screening in a clinic focused on longitudinal HIV care can effectively identify COPD among those completing the screening continuum.     

Feasibility of spirometry and reversibility testing for the identification of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on asthma registers in general practice

There is renewed interest in the diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) within primary care. Primary care physicians have difficulty distinguishing asthma from COPD. We tested the feasibility of using spirometry and if appropriate, reversibility testing, to identify patients with COPD on asthma registers in primary care. We carried out a cross-sectional study in three inner-city group practices in east London. Three hundred and twenty-eight patients aged 50 years and over on practice asthma registers were invited to attend for spirometry and, if appropriate, a trial of oral corticosteroids. The main outcome measures were: feasibility of carrying out spirometry; lung function; severity of COPD; prior diagnosis of COPD; response to a corticosteroid trial; quality of life. One hundred and sixty-eight of 328 (51%) patients attended for spirometry. According to British Thoracic Society criteria, 58 (34%) patients had normal spirometry at the time of assessment; 40 (24%) had active asthma and 57 (34%) had COPD. Thirteen patients (8%) were unable to perform spirometry. Of 57 patients with COPD 30 (53%) had mild, 15 (26%) had moderate and 12 (21%) had severe disease. Twenty-three of 57 (40%) patients with COPD on spirometry had this diagnosis recorded prior to the study. New diagnoses of COPD were more likely in those with mild or moderate disease (P<0.05). Twenty-three of 57 (40%) patients with COPD completed a corticosteroid trial: one showed significant reversibility of lung function. Spirometry was feasible and helped identify patients with COPD on asthma registers in these inner-city practices. Patients aged 50 years and over on asthma registers had a wide spectrum of lung function with considerable diagnostic misclassification. Some patients with normal lung function when tested may have had well controlled asthma. New diagnoses of COPD were mainly in those with mild or moderate disease.     

Burden of obstructive lung disease in a rural setting in the Philippines

Background and objective: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of and risk factors associated with COPD in a rural setting in the Philippines. Methods: The study was conducted in two municipalities in Nueva Ecija province in the Philippines. Using the Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease (BOLD) protocol and study design, non‐hospitalized men or women, aged 40 years or older, were recruited by multi‐stage random sampling procedures. Participants completed questionnaires on respiratory symptoms and exposure to potential risk factors for COPD, including smoking, occupation and exposure to burning of biomass fuel. Spirometry was performed according to American Thoracic Society criteria. Results: Of the 1188 individuals selected for recruitment, 722 had acceptable post‐bronchodilator spirometry and were classified according to Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) stage. The overall prevalence of COPD for all stages was 20.8%. The prevalence of COPD at GOLD Stage I or higher was greater in men compared with women (26.5% vs 15.3%), and increased between the ages of 40 to >70 years. Logistic regression analysis showed a significant association between all stages of COPD and farming for >40 years (odds ratio (OR) 2.48, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.43–4.30), use of firewood for cooking for >60 years (OR 3.48, 95% CI: 1.57–7.71), a smoking history of ≥20 pack‐years (OR 2.86; 95% CI: 1.78–4.60), and a history of tuberculosis (OR 6.31, 95% CI: 2.67–15.0). Conclusions: The prevalence COPD in a rural community in Nueva Ecija, Philippines was 20.8% for GOLD Stage I or higher, and 16.7% for GOLD Stage II or higher. In addition to smoking history, the use of firewood for cooking, working on a farm and a history of tuberculosis were significantly associated with fixed airflow obstruction, as assessed by spirometry.     

Prevalence of undiagnosed and undertreated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in lung cancer population

Background and objective: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a risk factor and important coexisting disease for lung cancer; however, the current status of management of COPD in lung cancer patients is not fully described. This study addressed this issue in a general teaching hospital in China. Methods: Medical records of hospitalized lung cancer patients in Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, between January 2006 and December 2010 were reviewed. The definition of COPD was according to the spirometric criteria of the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) document. The diagnostic rate (COPD recorded as a discharge diagnosis/spirometry‐defined percentage) and conformity to GOLD treatment guidelines were investigated. The factors influencing diagnosis were analysed. Results: During the study period, the prevalence of spirometry‐defined COPD in hospitalized lung cancer patients was 21.6% (705/3263). The overall diagnostic rate of COPD was 7.1%, and the treatment conformity for stable and acute exacerbation of COPD was 27.1% and 46.8%, respectively. Respiratory physicians had a higher diagnostic rate than non‐respiratory doctors (34.8% vs 2.9%, P < 0.001) and a better treatment conformity for acute exacerbation of COPD (63.6% vs 37.5%, P = 0.048). Patients with COPD as a discharge diagnosis had more chance to receive guideline‐consistent treatment. The diagnostic rate of COPD was higher among patients with a history of smoking, respiratory diseases or symptoms. Conclusions: COPD is substantially underdiagnosed and undertreated in a hospitalized lung cancer population. History of smoking, respiratory diseases and symptoms promotes diagnosis. Education of COPD knowledge among patients and doctors is urgently required in this special population.     

Spirometry utilization for COPD: how do we measure up?

BACKGROUND: COPD is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Guidelines recommend the confirmation of a COPD diagnosis with spirometry. Limited evidence exists, however, documenting the frequency of spirometry use in clinical practice. METHODS: The National Committee for Quality Assurance recruited five health plans to determine the proportion of patients >/= 40 years old with a new diagnosis of COPD who had received spirometry during the interval starting 720 days prior to diagnosis and ending 180 days after diagnosis. Patients were identified via International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision diagnostic codes for encounters during the period July 1, 2002, through June 30, 2003. For each patient, the participating plans provided patient demographic and claims data from administrative data systems. RESULTS: Participating health plans covered 1,597,749 members with a total of 5,039 eligible COPD patients identified. Patients in the 40 to 64 age range had the highest percentage of new COPD diagnoses. Women were also slightly more likely to undergo spirometry (33.5% vs 29.4%, p = 0.001). Approximately 32% of patients with a new diagnosis of COPD had undergone spirometry in the specified interval. Spirometry frequency was lowest in older patients, with the lowest frequency in those >/= 75 years old. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that approximately 32% of a broad range of patients with a new COPD diagnosis had undergone spirometry within the previous 2 years to 6 months following diagnosis. In addition, spirometric testing appeared to decrease with increasing age. As opposed to a prior report, women were not less likely to have undergone spirometry. This study shows that spirometry is infrequently used in clinical practice for diagnosis of COPD and suggests opportunities for practice improvement.     

The use of microspirometry in detecting lowered FEV1 values in current or former cigarette smokers

AIMS: COPD is an underdiagnosed disease. This study was undertaken to assess the value of microspirometry in detecting reduced FEV1 values in cigarette smokers, i.e., subjects at high risk for COPD. METHODS: A total of 611 smokers or ex-smokers with a smoking history >20 years and no previously-diagnosed lung disease were recruited (389 male, age 27-83 years, mean age 56 years, mean smoking history 35 pack years, 19% ex-smokers). RESULTS: An FEV1 < 80% predicted on microspirometry was found in 44.6% of cases. The mean FEV1 was 2.8 litres (80.6% predicted, range 26-121%). This correlated well with values obtained from full spirometry (R=0.965, p<0.0001). Detailed questionnaire responses revealed that almost half of the subjects (48.2%) reported chronic cough and sputum production and 39.8% reported breathlessness during exercise. CONCLUSIONS: Microspirometry finds a considerable number of smokers or ex-smokers with reduced FEV1 values. Microspirometry is quick to perform. All smokers with reduced microspirometry FEV1 values would benefit from smoking cessation, and all patients with reduced FEV1 values need to be considered for full spirometry to confirm if they actually have COPD.     

Prevalence of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Cyprus: A Population-Based Study

Abstract

Background: The prevalence of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) in Cyprus is largely unknown. The aim of the study was to estimate the prevalence of COPD in Cyprus through a spirometry population- based program and to identify certain disease characteristics in the Cypriot population. Methods: The study was performed in 1,233 randomly selected individuals covering representative urban and rural areas. Inclusion criteria were: age ≥ 35 years old and lifetime smoking history of at least 100 cigarettes. Participants answered a detailed questionnaire and underwent spirometry before and after the inhalation of 200 μg of salbutamol. COPD diagnosis and severity were based on criteria developed by the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Diseases. Results: The overall prevalence of spirometry diagnosed COPD subjects was 4.9% (5.1% in men vs 3.5% in women). Mild COPD was found in 33.3% of COPD individuals, moderate in 45%, severe and very severe COPD was found in 20% and 1.7%, respectively. Physician diagnosis was reported in 48.3% of spirometry diagnosed COPD subjects, whereas 55.9% were asymptomatic. Age (p = 0.000), increased tobacco consumption (p = 0.001) and cough with phlegm (p = 0.048) were found to have a synergistic effect on the diagnosis of COPD. Conclusions: Results suggest that COPD is an important health problem in Cyprus. Programs that raise public awareness focusing on prevention, early detection and treatment are needed. Under-diagnosis of COPD raises the need for spirometry screening programs in high risk individuals and guideline implementation for the management of the disease.     

Development and initial validation of a self-scored COPD Population Screener Questionnaire (COPD-PS)

COPD has a profound impact on daily life, yet remains underdiagnosed and undertreated. We set out to develop a brief, reliable, self-scored questionnaire to identify individuals likely to have COPD. COPD-PS development began with a list of concepts identified for inclusion using expert opinion from a clinician working group comprised of pulmonologists (n = 5) and primary care clinicians (n = 5). A national survey of 697 patients was conducted at 12 practitioner sites. Logistic regression identified items discriminating between patients with and without fixed airflow obstruction (AO, postbronchodilator FEV(1)/FVC < 70%). ROC analyses evaluated screening accuracy, compared scoring options, and assessed concurrent validity. Convergent and discriminant validity were assessed via COPD-PS and SF-12v2 score correlations. For known-groups validation, COPD-PS differences between clinical groups were tested. Test-retest reliability was evaluated in a 20% sample. Of 697 patients surveyed, 295 patients met expert review criteria for spirometry performance; 38% of these (n = 113) had results indicating AO. Five items positively predicted AO (p < 0.0001): breathlessness, productive cough, activity limitation, smoking history, and age. COPD-PS scores accurately classified AO status (area under ROC curve = 0.81) and reliable (r = 0.91). Patients with spirometry indicative of AO scored significantly higher (6.8, SD = 1.9; p< 0.0001) than patients without AO (4.0, SD = 2.3). Higher scores were associated with more severe AO, bronchodilator use, and overnight hospitalization for breathing problems. With the prevalence of COPD in the studied cohort, a score on the COPD-PS of greater than five was associated with a positive predictive value of 56.8% and negative predictive value of 86.4%. The COPD-PS accurately classified physician-reported COPD (AUC = 0.89). The COPD-PS is a brief, accurate questionnaire that can identify individuals likely to have COPD.     

Preguntas y respuestas relacionadas con tabaquismo en pacientes con EPOC. Aplicación de metodología con formato PICO

The ALAT and SEPAR Treatment and Control of Smoking Groups have collaborated in the preparation of this document which attempts to answer, by way of PICO methodology, different questions on health interventions for helping COPD patients to stop smoking.The main recommendations are: (i) moderate-quality evidence and strong recommendation for performing spirometry in COPD patients and in smokers with a high risk of developing the disease, as a motivational tool (particularly for showing evidence of lung age), a diagnostic tool, and for active case-finding; (ii) high-quality evidence and strong recommendation for using intensive dedicated behavioral counselling and drug treatment for helping COPD patients to stop smoking; (iii) high-quality evidence and strong recommendation for initiating interventions for helping COPD patients to stop smoking during hospitalization with improvement when the intervention is prolonged after discharge, and (iv) high-quality evidence and strong recommendation for funding treatment of smoking in COPD patients, in view of the impact on health and health economics.     

The necessity for spirometry in the primary care management of COPD.

Implementation of spirometry in the primary care setting is controversial. Spirometry allows a unique non-invasive look into the functioning of the lungs, which can be both medically informative and of practical value. Respiratory complaints are among the most prevalent in primary care, while smoking rates remain globally high, illustrating the need for proper tools to investigate the possible causes of chronic pulmonary symptoms. Smoking cessation programs and disease management programs are the preferred treatment strategies for COPD; these rely on a valid spirometric diagnosis, as promoted by international COPD guidelines. In addition, involving the patient in treatment plans and explaining the detrimental effects of smoking can be greatly facilitated by the visual impact of a flow-volume curve, have promoted the use of spirometry. While there are difficulties in implementation of spirometry in primary care. Provided that quality standards of performance and training are sufficiently met, evidence suggests that spirometry is a valid, feasible and interpretable diagnostic tool in a primary care setting. COPD is a growing problem for society, which should not be underestimated, and with sufficient funding, adequate training and motivated healthcare workers, there is no good reason why spirometric testing cannot be widely implemented.     

Asthma as a risk factor for COPD in a longitudinal study

BACKGROUND: For several years, asthma and COPD have been regarded as distinct entities, with distinct clinical courses. However, despite distinctive physiologic features at the time of diagnosis, and different risk factors, the two diseases over time may develop features that are quite similar. STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between physician-diagnosed asthma and the subsequent development of COPD in a cohort of 3,099 adult subjects from Tucson, AZ. DESIGN AND METHODS: A prospective observational study. Participants completed up to 12 standard respiratory questionnaires and 11 spirometry lung function measurements over a period of 20 years. Survival curves (with time to development of COPD as the dependent variable) were compared between subjects with asthma and subjects without asthma at the initial survey. RESULTS: Subjects with active asthma (n = 192) had significantly higher hazard ratios than inactive (n = 156) or nonasthmatic subjects (n = 2751) for acquiring COPD. As compared with nonasthmatics, active asthmatics had a 10-times-higher risk for acquiring symptoms of chronic bronchitis (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.94 to 20.25), 17-times-higher risk of receiving a diagnosis of emphysema (95% CI, 8.31 to 34.83), and 12.5-times-higher risk of fulfilling COPD criteria (95% CI, 6.84 to 22.84), even after adjusting for smoking history and other potential confounders. CONCLUSIONS: Physician-diagnosed asthma is significantly associated with an increased risk for CB, emphysema, and COPD.     

The diagnostic accuracies of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in general practice: The results of the MAGIC (Manchester Airways Group Identifying COPD) study.

BACKGROUND: Although it is generally accepted that chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is underdiagnosed, there is little objective information concerning the size of the problem in the UK. METHOD: Patients from two general practices were offered spirometry if they were aged 30 or older, had reported ever smoking in one of four postal respiratory surveys (1993-2001), and/or reported four or more symptoms or risk factors in 2001 indicating likely obstructive airways disease. RESULTS: Of 2646 subjects invited, 871 attended and 825 had adequate spirometry results for analysis. In all, 163 patients had spirometrically-confirmed COPD; 103 of these (63.2%) had no recorded COPD in their practice records, including 14 out of 31 (45.2%) whose spirometry results classified them as having severe or very severe COPD. CONCLUSION: This study found a considerable under-recording of COPD in two general practices. This may be due to a combination of administrative and diagnostic problems (including the under-use of spirometers), and a reluctance of patients to present with their symptoms. These results have important implications in terms of unmet need and resource utilisation.