Nanophase morphology and crystallization in poly(vinylidene fluoride)/polydimethylsiloxane‐block‐poly(methyl methacrylate) blends

A polydimethylsiloxane‐block‐poly(methyl methacrylate) (PDMS‐b‐PMMA) diblock copolymer was synthesized by the atom transfer radical polymerization method and blended with a high‐molecular‐weight poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF). In this A‐b‐B/C type of diblock copolymer/homopolymer system, semi‐crystallizable PVDF (C) and PMMA (B) block are miscible due to favorable intermolecular interactions. However, the A block (PDMS) is immiscible with PVDF and therefore generates nanostructured morphology via self‐assembly. Crystallization study reveals that both α and γ crystalline phases of PVDF are present in the blends with up to 30 wt% of PDMS‐b‐PMMA block copolymer. Adding 10 wt% of PVDF to PDMS‐b‐PMMA diblock copolymer leads to worm‐like micelle morphology of PDMS of 10 nm in diameter and tens of nanometers in length. Moreover, morphological results show that PDMS nanostructures are localized in the inter‐fibrillar region of PVDF with the addition of up to 20 wt% of the block copolymer. Increase of PVDF long period by 45% and decrease of degree of crystallization by 34% confirm the localization of PDMS in the PVDF inter‐fibrillar region. © 2018 Society of Chemical Industry     

Synthesis of amphiphilic poly(methyl methacrylate)‐block‐poly(methacrylic acid) diblock copolymers by atom transfer radical polymerization

Atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) of 1‐(butoxy)ethyl methacrylate (BEMA) was carried out using CuBr/2,2′‐bipyridyl complex as catalyst and 2‐bromo‐2‐methyl‐propionic acid ester as initiator. The number average molecular weight of the obtained polymers increased with monomer conversion, and molecular weight distributions were unimodal throughout the reaction and shifted toward higher molecular weights. Using poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) with a bromine atom at the chain end, which was prepared by ATRP, as the macro‐initiator, a diblock copolymer PMMA‐block‐poly [1‐(butoxy)ethyl methacrylate] (PMMA‐b‐PBEMA) has been synthesized by means of ATRP of BEMA. The amphiphilic diblock copolymer PMMA‐block‐poly(methacrylic acid) can be further obtained very easily by hydrolysis of PMMA‐b‐PBEMA under mild acidic conditions. The molecular weight and the structure of the above‐mentioned polymers were characterized with gel permeation chromatography, infrared spectroscopy and nuclear magnetic resonance. Copyright © 2005 Society of Chemical Industry     

Synthesis of poly(vinyl acetate) containing diblock copolymer by DPE method

Diblock copolymer poly(methyl methacrylate)‐b‐poly(vinyl acetate) (PMMA‐b‐PVAc) was prepared by 1,1‐diphenylethene (DPE) method. First, free‐radical polymerization of methyl methacrylate was carried out with AIBN as initiator in the presence of DPE, giving a DPE containing PMMA precursor with controlled molecular weight. Second, vinyl acetate was polymerized in the presence of the PMMA precursor and AIBN, and PMMA‐b‐PVAc diblock copolymer with controlled molecular weight was obtained. The formation of PMMA‐b‐PVAc was confirmed by ¹H NMR spectrum. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and dynamic light scattering (DLS) were used to detect the self‐assembly behavior of the diblock polymer in methanol. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2009     

Crystallization kinetics of PE‐b‐isotactic PMMA diblock copolymer synthesized using SiMe2(Ind)2ZrMe2 and MAO cocatalyst

Polyethylene‐b‐poly(methyl methacrylate) (PE‐b‐PMMA) diblock copolymer has important interfacial applications. Hence, a PE‐b‐isotactic PMMA diblock copolymer was synthesized using SiMe₂(Ind)₂ZrMe₂ and MAO cocatalyst. The polymerization mechanism and the origin of PMMA isotacticity were duly explained. An appropriate nonisothermal Avrami‐Erofeev crystallization model was developed to compare the crystallization kinetics of the above copolymer with that of a PE homopolymer. For both polymers, the model well matched the entire differential scanning calorimeter crystallinity profile, notably for a single Avrami‐Erofeev index, and predicted cylindrical crystal growth. This model particularly overcomes the limitations of the published nonisothermal crystallization models, and provides interesting insight into PE crystallization. The PMMA block significantly decreased the heats of crystallization and fusion, % crystallinity, and the relative crystallization function; increased the nonisothermal crystallization rate constant; and introduced minimal dilution effect whereas the PE block formed a continuous or percolated phase. This study correlates catalyst structure, copolymer block tacticity, and PE nonisothermal crystallization and melting behavior. © 2012 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 59: 200–214, 2013     

Nanophase morphology and crystallization in poly(vinylidene fluoride)/polydimethylsiloxane‐block‐poly(methyl methacrylate)‐block‐polystyrene blends

An approach to achieve confined crystallization of ferroelectric semicrystalline poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) was investigated. A novel polydimethylsiloxane‐block‐poly(methyl methacrylate)‐block‐polystyrene (PDMS‐b‐PMMA‐b‐PS) triblock copolymer was synthesized by the atom‐transfer radical polymerization method and blended with PVDF. Miscibility, crystallization and morphology of the PVDF/PDMS‐b‐PMMA‐b‐PS blends were studied within the whole range of concentration. In this A‐b‐B‐b‐C/D type of triblock copolymer/homopolymer system, crystallizable PVDF (D) and PMMA (B) middle block are miscible because of specific intermolecular interactions while A block (PDMS) and C block (PS) are immiscible with PVDF. Nanostructured morphology is formed via self‐assembly, displaying a variety of phase structures and semicrystalline morphologies. Crystallization at 145 °C reveals that both α and β crystalline phases of PVDF are present in PVDF/PDMS‐b‐PMMA‐b‐PS blends. Incorporation of the triblock copolymer decreases the degree of crystallization and enhances the proportion of β to α phase of semicrystalline PVDF. Introduction of PDMS‐b‐PMMA‐b‐PS triblock copolymer to PVDF makes the crystalline structures compact and confines the crystal size. Moreover, small‐angle X‐ray scattering results indicate that the immiscible PDMS as a soft block and PS as a hard block are localized in PVDF crystalline structures. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry     

Vesicular and micellar self‐assembly of stimuli‐responsive poly(N‐isopropyl acrylamide‐b‐9‐anthracene methyl methacrylate) amphiphilic diblock copolymers

Dually responsive amphiphilic diblock copolymers consisting of hydrophilic poly(N‐isopropyl acrylamide) [poly(NIPAAm)] and hydrophobic poly(9‐anthracene methyl methacrylate) were synthesized by reversible addition fragmentation chain‐transfer (RAFT) polymerization with 3‐(benzyl sulfanyl thiocarbonyl sulfanyl) propionic acid as a chain‐transfer agent. In the first step, the poly(NIPAAm) chain was grown to make a macro‐RAFT agent, and in the second step, the chain was extended by hydrophobic 9‐anthryl methyl methacrylate to yield amphiphilic poly(N‐isopropyl acrylamide‐b‐9‐anthracene methyl methacrylate) block copolymers. The formation of copolymers with three different hydrophobic block lengths and a fixed hydrophilic block was confirmed from their molecular weights. The self‐assembly of these copolymers was studied through the determination of the lower critical solution temperature and critical micelle concentration of the copolymers in aqueous solution. The self‐assembled block copolymers displayed vesicular morphology in the case of the small hydrophobic chain, but the morphology gradually turned into a micellar type when the hydrophobic chain length was increased. The variations in the length and chemical composition of the blocks allowed the tuning of the block copolymer responsiveness toward both the pH and temperature. The resulting self‐assembled structures underwent thermally induced and pH‐induced morphological transitions from vesicles to micelles and vice versa in aqueous solution. These dually responsive amphiphilic diblock copolymers have potential applications in the encapsulation of both hydrophobic and hydrophilic drug molecules, as evidenced from the dye encapsulation studies. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2018 , 135, 46474.     

Changes in the interfacial properties of PC/SAN blends with compatibilizer

Block copolymers of polycarbonate‐b‐poly(methyl methacrylate) (PC‐b‐PMMA) and tetramethyl poly(carbonate)‐b‐poly(methyl methacrylate) (TMPC‐b‐PMMA) were examined as compatibilizers for blends of polycarbonate (PC) with styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile (SAN) copolymer. To explore the effects of block copolymers on the compatibility of PC/SAN blends, the average diameter of the dispersed particles in the blend was measured with an image analyzer, and the interfacial properties of the blends were analyzed with an imbedded fiber retraction (IFR) technique and an asymmetric double cantilever beam fracture test. The average diameter of dispersed particles and interfacial tension of the PC/SAN blends were reduced by adding compatibilizer to the PC/SAN blends. Fracture toughness of the blends was also improved by enhancing interfacial adhesion with compatibilizer. TMPC‐b‐PMMA copolymer was more effective than PC‐b‐PMMA copolymer as a compatibilizer for the PC/SAN blends. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 89: 2649–2656, 2003     

A novel method for preparing silver/poly(siloxane‐b‐methyl methacrylate) nanocomposites with multiple properties in the DMF‐toluene mixture solvent

A novel method for preparing silver/poly(siloxane‐b‐methyl methacrylate) (Ag/(PDMS‐b‐PMMA)) hybrid nanocomposites was proposed by using the siloxane‐containing block copolymers as stabilizer. The reduction of silver nitrate (AgNO₃) was performed in the mixture solvent of dimethyl formamide (DMF) and toluene, which was used to dissolve double‐hydrophobic copolymer, as well as served as the powerful reductant. The presence of the PMMA block in the copolymer indeed exerted as capping ligands for nanoparticles. The resultant nanocomposites exhibited super hydrophobicity with water contact angle of 123.3^° and the thermogravimetry analysis (TGA) revealed that the resultant nanocomposites with more PDMS were more heat‐resisting. Besides, the antimicrobial efficiency of the most desirable nanocomposite (Ag/PDMS₆₅‐b‐PMMA₃₀ loaded with 7.3% silver nanoparticle) could reach up to 99.4% when contacting with escherichia coli within 120 min. As a whole, the resultant nanocomposites by the integration of excellent properties of silver nanoparticles as well as siloxane‐block copolymers can be a promising for the development of materials with hydrophobic, heat‐resisting and outstanding antibacterial properties from the chemical product engineering viewpoint. © 2013 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 59: 4780–4793, 2013     

Surface microphase separation in PDMS‐b‐PMMA‐b‐PHFBMA triblock copolymer films

Well‐defined poly(dimethylsiloxane)‐block‐poly(methyl methacrylate)‐block‐poly(2,2,3,3,4,4,4‐heptafluorobutyl methacrylate) (PDMS‐b‐PMMA‐b‐PHFBMA) triblock copolymers were synthesized via atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP). Surface microphase separation in the PDMS‐b‐PMMA‐b‐PHFBMA triblock copolymer films was investigated. The microstructure of the block copolymers was investigated by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM). Surface composition was studied by X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The chemical composition at the surface was determined by the surface microphase separation in the PDMS‐b‐PMMA‐b‐PHFBMA triblock copolymer films. The increase of the PHFBMA content could strengthen the microphase separation behavior in the PDMS‐b‐PMMA‐b‐PHFBMA triblock copolymer films and reduce their surface tension. Comparison between the PDMS‐b‐PMMA‐b‐PHFBMA triblock copolymers and the PDMS‐b‐PHFBMA diblock copolymers showed that the introduction of the PMMA segments promote the fluorine segregation onto the surface and decrease the fluorine content in the copolymers with low surface energy. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Investigation of polymer blends of polyamide-6 and poly(methyl methacrylate) synthesized by RAFT polymerization

Morphological and thermal properties of immiscible and incompatible polymer blends of commercial polyamide-6 (PA-6) and poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) synthesized via reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization have been studied in the presence of a compatibilizer consisting of either a random copolymer of styrene-maleic anhydride (SMA) or a diblock copolymer poly(methyl methacrylate) and polystyrene (PMMA-PS) also synthesized via RAFT polymerization. Blends of PA-6/PMMA were obtained by extrusion mixing. During melt compounding in the extruder, the functional groups of the polymer components were reacted in the presence of a compatibilizer, which changed considerably the morphology of the blend. After compatibilization, particles of PMMA in the PA-6 were smaller and better dispersed. The morphology and thermal properties of the blends were characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and differential scanning calorimetry (DCS).     

Chemo‐enzymatic synthesis of poly(2,2,2‐trichloroethyl 10‐hydroxydecanate)‐block‐polystyrene combining enzymatic self‐condensation polymerization and ATRP

Enzymatic polymerization in a non‐natural environment is of interest as an environmentally friendly methodology as an alternative to the use of conventional chemical organometallic catalysts. Chemo‐enzymatic synthesis of the AB‐type diblock copolymer poly(2,2,2‐trichloroethyl 10‐hydroxydecanate)‐block‐polystyrene (PHD‐b‐PSt) was carried out by combining enzymatic self‐condensation polymerization (eSCP) and atom‐transfer radical polymerization (ATRP). Biocatalyst Novozyme 435 was successful in catalyzing the eSCP of a novel ω‐hydroxyester, i.e. 2,2,2‐trichloroethyl 10‐hydroxydecanate. The resulting ? CCl₃‐terminated PHD initiated the ATRP of styrene, a ‘living’/controlled radical polymerization. The analysis of the hydrolysate from the copolymer proved the presence of a block copolymer structure. In addition, the well‐defined diblock copolymer PHD‐b‐PSt self‐assembled into nanoscale micelles in aqueous solution. The chemo‐enzymatic synthesis of diblock copolymer PHD‐b‐PSt was achieved by the combination of eSCP and ATRP. The structures and composition of the block copolymer were characterized by means of NMR, infrared and gel permeation chromatography measurements. Differential scanning calorimetry analysis showed that a microphase‐separation structure was formed in the copolymer, which was caused by the crystallization of the PHD segments. As investigated with atomic force microscopy and dynamic light scattering, these micelles had a mean diameter and a spherical shape. To our knowledge, this is the first example of a chemo‐enzymatic synthesis based on eSCP and ATRP. Copyright © 2007 Society of Chemical Industry     

Thermal behavior and properties of polystyrene/poly(methyl methacrylate) blends

The thermal behavior and properties of immiscible blends of polystyrene (PS) and poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) with and without PS‐b‐PMMA diblock copolymer at different melt blending times were investigated by use of a differential scanning calorimeter. The weight fraction of PS in the blends ranged from 0.1 to 0.9. From the measured glass transition temperature (T_g) and specific heat increment (ΔC_p) at the T_g, the PMMA appeared to dissolve more in the PS phase than did the PS in the PMMA phase. The addition of a PS‐b‐PMMA diblock copolymer in the PS/PMMA blends slightly promoted the solubility of the PMMA in the PS and increased the interfacial adhesion between PS and PMMA phases during processing. The thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) showed that the presence of the PS‐b‐PMMA diblock copolymer in the PS/PMMA blends afforded protection against thermal degradation and improved their thermal stability. Also, it was found that the PS was more stable against thermal degradation than that of the PMMA over the entire heating range. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 91: 609–620, 2004     

Synthesis and characterization of AB‐type copolymers poly(L‐lactide)‐block‐poly(methyl methacrylate) via a convenient route combining ROP and ATRP from a dual initiator

Diblock copolymers of poly(L ‐lactide)‐block‐poly(methyl methacrylate) (PLLA‐b‐PMMA) were synthesized through a sequential two‐step strategy, which combines ring‐opening polymerization (ROP) and atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP), using a bifunctional initiator, 2,2,2‐trichloroethanol. The trichloro‐terminated poly(L ‐lactide) (PLLA‐Cl) with high molecular weight (M_n,GPC = 1–12 × 10⁴ g/mol) was presynthesized through bulk ROP of L ‐lactide (L ‐LA), initiated by the hydroxyl group of the double‐headed initiator, with tin(II) octoate (Sn(Oct)₂) as catalyst. The second segment of the block copolymer was synthesized by the ATRP of methyl methacrylate (MMA), with PLLA‐Cl as macroinitiator and CuCl/N,N,N′,N″,N″‐pentamethyldiethylenetriamine (PMDETA) as catalyst, and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was chosen as reaction medium due to the poor solubility of the macroinitiator in conventional solvents at the reaction temperature. The trichloroethoxyl terminal group of the macroinitiator was confirmed by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and ¹H‐NMR spectroscopy. The comprehensive results from GPC, FTIR, ¹H‐NMR analysis indicate that diblock copolymers PLLA‐b‐PMMA (M_n,GPC = 5–13 × 10⁴ g/mol) with desired molecular composition were obtained by changing the molar ratio of monomer/initiator. DSC, XRD, and TG analyses establish that the crystallization of copolymers is inhibited with the introduction of PMMA segment, which will be beneficial to ameliorating the brittleness, and furthermore, to improving the thermal performance. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2010     

Preparation and characterization of amphiphilic block copolymer of polyacrylonitrile‐block‐poly(ethylene oxide)

The synthesis of polyacrylonitrile‐block‐poly(ethylene oxide) (PAN‐b‐PEO) diblock copolymers is conducted by sequential initiation and Ce(IV) redox polymerization using amino‐alcohol as the parent compound. In the first step, amino‐alcohol potassium with a protected amine group initiates the polymerization of ethylene oxide (EO) to yield poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) with an amine end group (PEO‐NH₂), which is used to synthesize a PAN‐b‐PEO diblock copolymer with Ce(IV) that takes place in the redox initiation system. A PAN‐poly(ethylene glycol)‐PAN (PAN‐PEG‐PAN) triblock copolymer is prepared by the same redox system consisting of ceric ions and PEG in an aqueous medium. The structure of the copolymer is characterized in detail by GPC, IR, ¹H‐NMR, DSC, and X‐ray diffraction. The propagation of the PAN chain is dependent on the molecular weight and concentration of the PEO prepolymer. The crystallization of the PAN and PEO block is discussed. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 89: 1753–1759, 2003     

Surface‐initiated atom transfer radical polymerization from Mg(OH)2 nanoparticles to prepare the well‐defined polymer‐Mg(OH)2 nanocomposites

Well‐defined polymer‐Mg(OH)₂ nanocomposites were prepared by atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP). The ATRP initiators were covalently attached to the Mg(OH)₂ by esterification of 2‐chloropropionyl chloride with hydroxyl group. The amount of polymer grafted from Mg(OH)₂ can be controlled using a different catalyst system and adding a small amount of polar solvent. The well‐defined diblock copolymer, consisting of poly(styrene) (PS) and poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) were synthesized. The products were characterized by nuclear magnetic resonance, Fourier transform infrared, differential scanning calorimetry, and thermal gravimetric analysis. The morphologies of PS/PMMA and PS/PMMA/Mg(OH)₂‐g‐PS‐b‐PMMA blends are compared by using a scanning electron microscope. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 103: 3680–3687, 2007     

Thermal behaviour of polyethylene‐block‐poly(methyl methacrylate) block copolymer: effect of multiple heating and cooling rates versus mathematical artefact

The melting and crystallization behaviours of a polyethylene‐block‐poly(methyl methacrylate) (PE‐b‐PMMA) diblock copolymer and a PE homopolymer were investigated using multiple heating and cooling rate differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) experiments, and modelling of the crystallization kinetics and lamellar thickness distribution. This new model was first validated applying literature and experimental data. The model‐predicted morphology (n = 3.2) closely matched the spherulitic morphology (n = 3), which was determined using polarized optical microscopy. For each experimental cooling rate, the model predicted diblock copolymer crystallinity that well matched the entire DSC crystallinity curve, notably for an Avrami–Erofeev index of n = 2; and apparent crystallization activation energy that hardly varied with the cooling rates used, relative crystallinity (α), and crystallization temperature or time. This disfavours the concept of variable activation energy. The use of the right crystallization model and parameter estimation algorithm is important for addressing the mathematical artefact. Under non‐isothermal cooling, the PE‐b‐PMMA diblock copolymer, as per the model prediction, crystallized without confinement (n ≠ 1), preserving the cylindrical structure. From the characteristic shapes of the crystallization function f(α(T)) versus 1/T and crystallization rate versus α plots, the resulting T_cmax and narrow α_max range can guide the search for an appropriate crystallization model. The overall treatment illustrated in this study is not restricted to a PE homopolymer and a PE‐b‐isotactic PMMA block copolymer. It can be generally applied to crystalline homopolymers and copolymers (alternating, random and block), as well as their blends. The block copolymers and blends can be crystalline–amorphous as well as crystalline–crystalline. © 2014 Society of Chemical Industry     

Recoverable surface modification using dendritically fluorocarbon‐functionalized poly(methyl methacrylate)

Dendritically fluorocarbon‐functionalized poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) has been explored as a robust surface‐modifying additive in PMMA blends. These functionalized materials, denoted F_xPMMA_y, where x is the number of C₈F₁₇ fluorocarbon groups per dendron connected to a PMMA chain of y kg/mol, have been synthesized by living radical polymerization. These materials adsorb efficiently to the surfaces of their blends with unfunctionalized PMMA, resulting in increased hydrophobicity and lipophobicity. Contact‐angle goniometry has indicated a substantial reduction in the surface energy toward polytetrafluoroethylene‐like surface properties in the case of pure F₄PMMA_8.6 and substantial, but incomplete fluorocarbon surface coverage at a lower F_xPMMA_y concentration. The partial coverage has been confirmed by Rutherford backscattering and, together with the weak dependence of the surface modification on the F_xPMMA_y structure, indicates incomplete equilibrium of the surface adsorption. The modified surfaces are quite durable with respect to abrasion under water but are progressively eroded when the double‐wipe test is carried out with acetone. F_xPMMA_y, dispersed in the remaining film, acts as a reservoir of spare functional groups, from which the damaged surface may be replenished, leading to the recovery of the modified surface properties. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 2007     

Effects of tetramethylpolycarbonate‐block‐poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) copolymers containing various amounts of acrylonitrile on the interfacial properties of polycarbonate and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) blends

Tetramethylpolycarbonate‐block‐poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (TMPC‐block‐SAN) block copolymers containing various amounts of acrylonitrile (AN) were examined as compatibilizers for blends of polycarbonate (PC) with poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (SAN) copolymers. To explore the effects of block copolymers on the compatibility of PC/SAN blends, the average diameter of the dispersed particles in the blend was measured with an image analyzer, and the interfacial properties of the blends were analyzed with an imbedded fibre retraction technique and an asymmetric double‐cantilever beam fracture test. Reduction in the average diameter of dispersed particles and effective improvement in the interfacial properties was observed by adding TMPC‐block‐SAN copolymers as compatibilizer of PC/SAN blend. TMPC‐block‐SAN copolymer was effective as a compatibilizer when the difference in the AN content of SAN copolymer and that of SAN block in TMPC‐block‐SAN copolymer was less than about 10 wt%. Copyright © 2004 Society of Chemical Industry     

Synthesis and characterization of diblock,triblock, and multiblock copolymers containing poly(3‐hydroxy butyrate) units

A poly[(R,S)‐3‐hydroxybutyrate] macroinitiator (PHB‐MI) was obtained through the condensation reaction of poly[(R,S)‐3‐hydroxybutyrate] (PHB) oligomers containing dihydroxyl end functionalities with 4,4′‐azobis(4‐cyanopentanoyl chloride). The PHB‐MI obtained in this way had hydroxyl groups at two end of the polymer chain and an internal azo group. The synthesis of ABA‐type PHB‐b‐PMMA block copolymers [where A is poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and B is PHB] via PHB‐MI was accomplished in two steps. First, multiblock active copolymers with azo groups (PMMA‐PHB‐MI) were prepared through the redox free‐radical polymerization of methyl methacrylate (MMA) with a PHB‐MI/Ce(IV) redox system in aqueous nitric acid at 40°C. Second, PMMA‐PHB‐MI was used in the thermal polymerization of MMA at 60°C to obtain PHB‐b‐PMMA. When styrene (S) was used instead of MMA in the second step, ABCBA‐type PMMA‐b‐PHB‐b‐PS multiblock copolymers [where C is polystyrene (PS)] were obtained. In addition, the direct thermal polymerization of the monomers (MMA or S) via PHB‐MI provided AB‐type diblocks copolymers with MMA and BCB‐type triblock copolymers with S. The macroinitiators and block copolymers were characterized with ultraviolet–visible spectroscopy, nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, gel permeation chromatography, cryoscopic measurements, and thermogravimetric analysis. The increases in the intrinsic viscosity and fractional precipitation confirmed that a block copolymer had been obtained. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 94: 1789–1796, 2004     

Fabrication of poly(methyl methacrylate)‐block‐poly(N‐isopropylacrylamide) amphiphilic diblock copolymer on silicon substrates via surface‐initiated reverse iodine transfer polymerization

Amphiphilic diblock copolymer on silicon substrates were synthesized via surface‐initiated reverse iodine transfer polymerization (RITP) technique. The silicon substrates (Si (111) surface) were modified with the azo groups, which were introduced by the treatment of Si (111) surface with 4,4′‐azobis (4‐cyanopentanoic acid). The poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) were then prepared under RITP conditions from the Si (111) wafer. The synthesis of amphiphilic diblock copolymer was carried out on Si‐g‐PMMA substrate by sequential addition of monomer N‐isopropylacrylamide (NIPAM). The observed narrow molecular weight distributions (M_w/M_n), linear kinetic plots, and linear plots of molecular weight (M_n) versus monomer conversion indicate that the chain growth from the silicon substrates is a controlled process with a “living” characteristic. The ellipsometry and contact angle results indicated that the MMA had grafted from the surface of the silicon substrates successfully and the graft layer was well defined. The structure of the polymer and the ability to extend the chains were characterized and confirmed with the surface sensitive techniques such as X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy and atomic force microscope. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 54:925–931, 2014. © 2013 Society of Plastics Engineers