自体外周血造血干细胞移植治疗多发性骨髓瘤16例临床疗效观察

目的:评价自体外周血造血干细胞移植(autologousperipheralbloodstemcelltransplantation,APBSCT)治疗多发性骨髓瘤的临床疗效。方法:16例确诊多发性骨髓瘤患者接受APBSCT,其中2例接受了二次移植,1例接受CD34+细胞筛选后的自体外周血造血干细胞移植。移植后继续常规化疗,13例患者给予α-干扰素维持治疗。结果:APBSCT可延长多发性骨髓瘤患者的无瘤生存率及总生存率,该组患者3年、5年无瘤生存率分别为18.75%±9.75%、0,平均无瘤生存时间为24.8个月。3年、5年总生存率分别为41.25%±12.72%、18.33%±10.77%,平均总生存时间为37.4个月。本组移植患者的CR率高,达76.92%,接近国外报道。而且,移植后造血重建快,移植相关并发症少。结论:APBSCT是治疗多发性骨髓瘤、改善其预后的重要手段。     

PAD序贯自体造血干细胞移植治疗难治多发性骨髓瘤(附22例)

目的:多发性骨髓瘤(multiple myeloma,MM)至今仍不可治愈,几乎所有病人均会出现复发或难治,本文初步探讨硼替佐米应用于难治性MM患者PAD化疗并序贯自体外周血造血干细胞移植(autologous pe-ripheral blood stem cell t ransplantation,APBSCT)的可行性和疗效。方法:采用PAD(硼替佐米+阿霉素+地塞米松)方案治疗复发或难治性MM。结果:22例中3例难治MM患者给予PAD方案化疗4-6个疗程后,2例达到接近完全缓解(nCR),1例达到部分缓解(VGPR),并随后行APBSCT,动员方案PAD+CTX(PAD,环磷酰胺1.5g/m2,d15)联合G-CSF。预处理方案为马法兰140mg/m2。移植后采用沙利度胺100mg/天。所有患者在移植前均达到CR或VGPR,干细胞采集充分,安全有效,移植后造血功能均快速顺利重建。无1例死亡。移植后采用沙利度胺维持,随访3-12个月,病情稳定。结论:PAD用于难治MM患者的治疗达CR后,继续序贯进行APBSCT不仅可行,而且PAD不影响正常造血干细胞动员,故采用PAD和序贯用PAD+CTX动员方案的APBSCT的治疗手段,为难治MM患者的治疗提供新的治疗手段。但对长期生存的改善作用需进一步研究。     

PAD序贯自体造血干细胞移植治疗难治多发性骨髓瘤（附22例）

目的：多发性骨髓瘤（multiple myeloma,MM）至今仍不可治愈,几乎所有病人均会出现复发或难治,本文初步探讨硼替佐米应用于难治性MM患者PAD化疗并序贯自体外周血造血干细胞移植（autologous pe-ripheral blood stem cell t ransplantation,APBSCT）的可行性和疗效。方法：采用PAD（硼替佐米＋阿霉素＋地塞米松）方案治疗复发或难治性MM。结果：22例中3例难治MM患者给予PAD方案化疗4-6个疗程后,2例达到接近完全缓解（nCR）,1例达到部分缓解（VGPR）,并随后行APBSCT,动员方案PAD＋CTX（PAD,环磷酰胺1.5g/m2,d15）联合G-CSF。预处理方案为马法兰140mg/m2。移植后采用沙利度胺100mg/天。所有患者在移植前均达到CR或VGPR,干细胞采集充分,安全有效,移植后造血功能均快速顺利重建。无1例死亡。移植后采用沙利度胺维持,随访3-12个月,病情稳定。结论：PAD用于难治MM患者的治疗达CR后,继续序贯进行APBSCT不仅可行,而且PAD不影响正常造血干细胞动员,故采用PAD和序贯用PAD＋CTX动员方案的APBSCT的治疗手段,为难治MM患者的治疗提供新的治疗手段。但对长期生存的改善作用需进一步研究。     

T - VAD 方案联合自体外周血造血干细胞移植治疗多发性骨髓瘤的疗效观察

目的：观察 T - VAD 方案联合自体外周血造血干细胞移植（ autologous peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cells,APBSC）治疗多发性骨髓瘤（multiple myeloma,MM）的临床疗效及不良反应。方法：选取2010年1月-2014年12月采用 T - VAD 方案联合自体外周血造血干细胞移植治疗的30例多发性骨髓瘤患者的临床资料进行回顾性研究。T - VAD 方案：沙利度胺起始剂量为50mg/晚,每周增加50～100mg/晚,最大剂量200mg/晚,若无明显不适,持续服用。长春新碱0.4mg/ d,静脉滴注,第1～4d;多柔比星10mg/（m2·d）,静脉滴注,第1～4d;地塞米松40mg/ d,静脉滴注,第1～4d,第9～12d,28d 为一个疗程,共4个疗程。T - VAD 方案4个疗程诱导治疗后给予自体外周血造血干细胞采集、移植术。结果：患者移植术后,造血功能均顺利重建,无移植相关的死亡发生。30例患者在移植后3个月,完全缓解10例（33.3%）,高质量缓解（非常好的部分反应,VGPR）16例（53.3%）,部分反应2例（6.6%）,无变化2例（6.6%）。不良反应主要有不同程度的恶心、呕吐、脱发及骨髓抑制等。结论：T - VAD 联合自体外周血造血干细胞移植治疗多发性骨髓瘤疗效明显,患者耐受性好。     

硼替佐米联合自体造血干细胞移植治疗多发性骨髓瘤的临床分析

目的探讨硼替佐米联合自体造血干细胞移植治疗多发性骨髓瘤的疗效和安全性。方法对1例轻链型多发性骨髓瘤患者,采用VTD方案（硼替佐米1.3 mg/m2,d 1、4、8、11;沙利度胺200 mg,d 1～14;地塞米松10 mg,d 1～4、d 9～12）化疗3个周期获得完全缓解后再行自体造血干细胞移植,监测M蛋白、肝肾功能、骨髓像、血象等指标,移植后再行白介素-2的免疫治疗。结果自体造血干细胞移植后患者造血重建顺利,相关并发症控制较好,随访至今一直无病生存。结论硼替佐米联合自体造血干细胞移植治疗多发性骨髓瘤是安全有效的。     

56例多发性骨髓瘤患者自体外周血造血干细胞动员方案的临床分析

  目的  旨在比较化疗联合粒细胞集落刺激因子（chemotherapy plus granulocyte cyte colony stimulating factor,G-CSF）与化疗联合G-CSF和粒巨噬细胞集落刺激因子（granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor,GM-CSF）方案对多发性骨髓瘤（multiple myeloma,MM）患者外周血造血干细胞（peripheral blood stem cell,PBSC）动员、采集及造血重建的影响。  方法  回顾性分析56例2008年5月至2016年7月天津医科大学肿瘤医院血液科化疗联合G-CSF或化疗联合G-CSF和GM-CSF动员采集PBSC行自体外周血造血干细胞移植（autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation,APBSCT）的MM患者资料。分析患者年龄、性别、疾病类型、临床分期（DS、ISS、R-ISS分期系统）、既往治疗方案和周期数等因素对动员效果及移植后造血重建、发热和抗生素应用等的影响。  结果  单因素分析发现女性、ISS分期Ⅲ期、R-ISS分期Ⅱ/Ⅲ期及化疗+G-CSF动员方案的患者采集效果较差（P < 0.05）。年龄≤ 60岁或年龄 > 60岁、疾病类型、DS分期（Ⅰ+Ⅱ/Ⅲ）、动员前化疗次数（≤ 6次或 > 6次）、有无烷化剂治疗史、动员前疾病缓解状态部分缓解（partial response,PR）或完全缓解（complete response,CR）及确诊到动员间隔时间（≤ 18个月或 > 18个月）与采集获得的CD34+细胞数及采集成功率无相关性（P > 0.05）。进一步多因素分析结果显示,化疗联合G-CSF和GM-CSF患者较化疗联和GCSF患者采集成功率较高（OR=12.009,95%CI:1.961~73.537）,不同动员方案是影响干细胞采集结果的独立预后因素（P=0.007）。所有患者移植后均顺利获得造血重建,无移植相关性死亡。两项动员方案组的造血重建时间及回输后发热、抗生素使用情况差异均无统计学意义（P > 0.05）。  结论  化疗联合G-CSF和GM-CSF动员方案采集的成功率较高,而不良反应未见增加,该动员方案可作为MM患者外周血干细胞动员的一项较好选择。      

自体造血干细胞移植治疗多发性骨髓瘤

 自体造血干细胞移植（ASCT）治疗多发性骨髓瘤进展较大。与常规方案相比，ASCT提高了患者的完全缓解（CR）、无事件生存（EFS）和总生存率（OS）。高龄、肾衰竭并非ASCT的禁忌证。双次ASCT可提高CR率，对长期EFS率、OS率影响仍需观察。改进预处理方案、选择移植时机、改进移植后巩固治疗可以提高疗效。     

造血干细胞移植治疗多发性骨髓瘤

 自体造血干细胞移植（auto-HSCT）显著提高了65岁以下多发性骨髓瘤（MM）患者的疗效,早期进行auto-HSCT已成为年轻初发MM患者的标准治疗方法。美法仑200 mg／m2目前仍被认为是最佳的预处理方案。对于首次自体移植后未达到非常好的部分缓解（VGPR）及以上疗效的患者,推荐采用序贯双次auto-HSCT以进一步提高疗效。新的治疗MM药物在auto-HSCT前和预处理中的应用可提高自体干细胞移植（ASCT）疗效。异基因造血干细胞移植（allo-HSCT）虽然 完全缓解（CR）率较高,但因具有较高的移植相关毒性,患者的长期生存率并不比ASCT高。减低剂量的allo-HSCT由于预处理毒性小,移植相关死亡率低,将可能成为一种安全有效的治疗方法。ASCT结合非清髓的allo-HSCT的疗效目前还需大样本的研究来证实。     

造血干细胞移植治疗多发性骨髓瘤的研究进展

 【摘要】　造血干细胞移植（HSCT）是治疗多发性骨髓瘤（MM）的一线方案。自体造血干细胞移植（auto-HSCT）可提高患者缓解率,延长生存期。首次auto-HSCT后,未获得非常好的部分缓解及以上疗效的患者,可行二次auto-HSCT进一步改善疗效。异基因造血干细胞移植（allo-HSCT）具有治愈MM的潜能,但移植相关死亡率高,患者生存并未获益。减低剂量的allo-HSCT相关死亡率低,但复发率高,也未显示出生存优势。序贯auto-HSCT及allo-HSCT也未使患者生存明显获益。总结近期HSCT的研究进展。     

Novel agents-based regimens as induction treatment prior to autologous stem-cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

To investigate the effect of novel agents like bortezomib, lenalidomide and thalidomide as part of induction treatment prior to autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) for previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma, we performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Medline, Embase, the Cochrane controlled trials register and the Science Citation Index were searched for RCTs of novel agents as part of induction therapy before ASCT. Three RCTs of bortezomib, two RCTs of thalidomide and no RCT of lenalidomide were identified, covering a total of 2,316 subjects. Due to different mechanisms of action, we performed a subgroup analysis by type of agent (thalidomide or bortezomib). The weighted risk ratios of a complete response (CR) were 4.25 [95% CI: 2.44-7.41] (p < 0.001) for bortezomib and 1.66 [95% CI: 1.15-2.38] (p = 0.007) for thalidomide, respectively. The summary hazard ratios for progression-free survival (PFS) were 0.73 [95% CI: 0.59-0.89] (p = 0.002) for bortezomib and 0.68 [95% CI: 0.59-0.79] (p < 0.001) for thalidomide, respectively. The corresponding ratios for overall survival (OS) were 0.87 [95% CI: 0.64-1.18] (p = 0.37) and 0.88 [95% CI: 0.73-1.05] (p = 0.14), respectively. Additionally, there was a statistically significant heterogeneity between subgroups (thalidomide and bortezomib) for CR (p = 0.005) but nonsignificant for PFS (p = 0.64) and OS (p = 0.97). In conclusion, our analysis showed novel agents as induction treatment prior to ASCT improved CR and PFS but not OS.     

自体造血干细胞移植治疗多发性骨髓瘤的疗效及预后影响因素分析

目的:探讨自体造血干细胞移植治疗多发性骨髓瘤（MM）的疗效和影响MM患者预后的因素。方法:回顾性分析我院2012年01月至2019年12月37例接受自体造血干细胞移植的MM患者的临床资料,中位随访时间为55（1～91）个月。对37例患者的反应深度、无进展生存时间（PFS）、总生存时间（OS）和影响预后的相关因素进行分析。结果:移植后3月内疗效达到完全缓解率和深度缓解率均优于移植前（P＜0.01,P＜0.05）,移植前后总有效率（ORR）比较无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。患者3年、5年OS率为97.0%、81.4%;3年、5年PFS率为62.7%、51.0%;中位PFS和OS均未获得。单因素分析结果表明移植后3月内疗效获得深度缓解较未获得患者无论是OS 还是PFS均较优 (P均＜0.01);诱导化疗后获得深度缓解可明显延长OS（P＜0.05）;DS分期Ⅰ-Ⅱ期、mSMART3.0危险分层标危患者相比DS分期Ⅲ期、高危患者PFS均有明显优势(P＜0.05)。Cox 多因素回归分析显示,移植后3月内疗效达深度缓解是PFS和OS的独立预后因素,mSMART3.0危险分层也是PFS的独立预后因素。结论:自体造血干细胞移植可以提高 MM 患者的反应深度。移植前后疗效、DS分期和mSMART3.0危险分层均可影响MM患者生存率。移植后3月内疗效达深度缓解是PFS 和OS的独立预后因素,mSMART3.0危险分层也是PFS的独立预后因素。     

Safety and survival outcomes for bloodless transplantation in patients with myeloma

High-dose therapy (HDT) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) are established components in the treatment of multiple myeloma; however, undergoing transplantation usually requires hematopoietic support, which poses a challenge among patients who are unwilling to receive blood products. Most transplant centers decline HDT/ASCT to these patients because of safety concerns. Here, the authors’ institutional data on safety, engraftment parameters, and survival outcomes after bloodless ASCT (BL-ASCT) are examined among patients with myeloma. This retrospective case-control study included patients who underwent BL-ASCT and Transfusion-supported ASCT (TS-ASCT) at Emory University Hospital between August 2006 and August 2016. In total, 24 patients who underwent BL-ASCT and 70 who underwent TS-ASCT were included. The median time for neutrophil engraftment, platelet engraftment and the median length of hospital stay all were equivalent for both groups. There were no transplant-related cardiovascular complications or mortality in either the BL-ASCT group or the TS-ASCT group. The median progression-free survival was 36 months and 44 months in the BL-ASCT and TS-ASCT groups, respectively (P = .277), and the median OS was not reached in either group at a median follow-up of 59 months after ASCT (P = .627). There was no transplant-related mortality at the 100-day or 1-year mark in either group. BL-ASCT is safe and feasible; transplant-related mortality, cardiovascular and hematologic complications are similar to those associated with TS-ASCT. Furthermore, BL-ASCT can yield similar engraftment and survival parameters comparable to those observed with TS-ASCT.     

Efficacy of up-front treatment with a double stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma

BACKGROUND: We report the outcome of 53 patients with multiple myeloma (MM), who received autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) from April 1996 to September 2004 at our institution and who survived for more than 3 months after the transplant. METHODS: Following the first ASCT, 36 patients underwent an up-front second SCT, which consisted of either an ASCT (n = 24) or a reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic stem cell transplant (RIST) (n = 12). Seventeen patients were given maintenance treatment. RESULTS: Seventy-seven percent of the patients (n = 41) showed an objective response to the initial therapy prior to the first ASCT. Overall, 60.4% (32 out of 53) and 32.1% (17 out of 53) of the patients had a complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) after the first ASCT, respectively. At the time of analysis, 34 patients (64.2%) were still alive. With a median follow-up of 32 months (range 9-98), the estimated progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) at 5 years were 17.0 and 34.9%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that the second SCT, normal hemoglobin and <50% marrow plasma cells were associated with an improved PFS. A second SCT, CR to the first SCT, female gender and an absence of advanced bone lesions were associated with a better OS. CONCLUSIONS: A second SCT is the most significant factor for an improved PFS and OS after the first ASCT (P < 0.001, respectively). Up-front double SCT is needed to improve the OS and PFS in patients with MM.     

Exploratory analysis of intensified conditioning as first line treatment for patients with high risk multiple myeloma

Multiple myeloma has extremely heterogeneous outcomes. Among prognostic factors, t(4;14) and del(17p) are rare oncogenic events associated with very poor prognosis. In an exploratory case-control study, we compared the combination of Busulfan-Melphalan or TBI-Melphalan with high dose Melphalan as a conditioning regimen in a series of 48 patients with del(17p) or t(4;14). These regimens were preceded by a Bortezomib-containing induction. Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary endpoint whereas overall survival (OS) and complete response (CR) rate were the secondary endpoints. Twenty consecutive cases of high-risk myeloma received a reinforced conditioning regimen of Busulfan 0.8 mg/kg x4/j IV from day-6 to day-3 pre- graft (BuMel) or total body irradiation (TBI) 12 Gy (TbiMel), having received Melphalan 140 mg/m² at day-2 pre-graft. These cases were matched to 28 controls treated with Melphalan 200 mg/m² at day-2 (Mel200). After intensification ± consolidation, with a median follow-up of 6.3 years, the CR rate was higher in the BuMel/TbiMel group (65% vs 50%, P = .006). No differences were observed between both groups in terms of PFS and OS (P = .96). PFS in patients with a del(17p) mutation tended to be superior in the BuMel/TbiMel group. Our exploratory study shows that reinforcing the intensification regimen with Busulfan or TBI does not seem to improve the prognosis associated to t(4;14) and del(17p) abnormalities.     

Bortezomib,thalidomide, and dexamethasone as induction therapy for patients with symptomatic multiple myeloma

BACKGROUND:

This single‐center retrospective study determined the efficacy of bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (BTD) as induction for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who were eligible for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT).

METHODS:

Patients with symptomatic MM who had received BTD induction before stem cell collection at Winship Cancer Institute were included. BTD induction comprised up to 8 3‐week cycles of bortezomib 1.3 mg/m² on Days 1, 4, 8, and 11; thalidomide 100 mg daily; and dexamethasone 40 mg on Days 1 through 4 and Days 9 through 12. Stem cell mobilization involved granulocyte‐colony–stimulating factor and/or cyclophosphamide. Response was assessed according to European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation criteria.

RESULTS:

Review of medical records identified 44 eligible patients (34 patients who were treated in the front‐line setting and 10 patients who were treated for recurrent disease) who received a median of 4 BTD cycles. The overall response rate (ORR) was 91%, which included a greater than or equal to very good partial response (≥VGPR) rate of 57% (including 20% stringent complete responses/complete response [sCR/CR] rate). In front‐line patients, the ORR was 94%, which included a 56% ≥VGPR rate (24% sCR/CR). The median CD34‐positive stem cell collection was 10.67 × 10⁶/kg. The ORR after ASCT in 34 patients who were evaluable for response was 100%, including a 76% ≥VGPR rate (53% sCR/CR). Among all 44 patients, the median progression‐free survival (PFS) was 27.4 months. The median overall survival (OS) was not reached after a median follow‐up of 25 months, and the 2‐year OS rate was 82%. There were no significant differences in PFS (27.4 months vs 23.5 months) or in 2‐year survival (80% vs 90%) between patients who did and did not undergo ASCT, respectively. Twenty patients (45%) developed neuropathy, including 4 (9%) with grade 3 neuropathy episodes, and 1 patient developed deep vein thrombosis.

CONCLUSIONS:

BTD was highly effective and well tolerated as induction for MM patients who were eligible for ASCT. Long‐term outcomes appeared to be similar with or without ASCT consolidation. Cancer 2010. © 2010 American Cancer Society.     

Comparison of fixed dose pegfilgrastim and daily filgrastim after autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma autografted on a outpatient basis

Different authors have explored the feasibility of autografting patients with multiple myeloma (MM) on an outpatient basis. Peg-filgrastim (PEG), a long-acting recombinant G-CSF, has similar efficacy when compared to conventional G-CSF for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia, but little is known about its use in the autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) setting, namely in patients programmed to be autografted on outpatient basis. In this study, we compared therapeutic results in terms of hematopoietic recovery, non-hematologic toxicity, duration of hospitalization and percentage of hospital readmission between patients receiving either conventional G-CSF or PEG. Thirty-eight MM patients (48 autografts) received PEG, given at a single dose of 6 mg at day +5 from stem cell infusion, while 81 (113 autografts) received G-CSF from day + 2 up to stable neutrophil recovery. The conditioning regimen was high dose melphalan in all patients. The median age and the median number of CD34 + cell infused were comparable between the two groups. Overall, a second hospital admission was required in 36 procedures out of 161 (32%). Febrile neutropenia (FN) and severe mucositis were the most frequent causes of hospitalization. There was no statistically significant difference as percentage of hospital readmission is concerned: in the PEG group readmission was needed in 6 out of 48 autografts (12%) as opposed to 30 out of 113 (26%) in the G-CSF subgroup, p: 0.06. The median time of hospital stay for readmitted patients was identical for the two subgroups (9 days vs. 9 days, p: 0.94). Finally, one case of transplant related mortality occurred in the whole patient series (0.6%). In conclusion, ASCT on an outpatient basis is feasible and safe in patients with MM, the majority of whom are manageable at home. The administration of single dose PEG results in no different outcome in terms of safety and efficacy as compared to 8 days of G-CSF.