Influence of timing of morphine administration on postoperative pain and analgesic consumption

Flow cytometry was used to demonstrate that cultured human melanoma BRO cells expressed membrane-bound tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) and were able to release TNF-alpha upon treatment with glucosaminylmuramyl dipeptide (GMDP). The released TNF-alpha was shown to prime melanoma cells, previously unable to respond to GMDP by increasing expression of melanoma-associated antigens, making them sensitive to GMDP treatment.     

Decrease in isoflurane requirements and of postoperative pain with preanesthetic intrathecal morphine

OBJECTIVES: 1) To determine whether preanesthetic intrathecal administration of 0.5 mg morphine reduces isoflurane requirements for anesthetic maintenance. 2) To assess the duration of postoperative analgesia and the type and frequency of complications attributable to the procedure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A series of 45 adults were distributed into 3 groups of 15 patients each based on site of surgery and site of preanesthetic (30 min) injection of 0.5 mg pure morphine. Control group (C0) patients underwent lumbar surgery and received subcutaneous morphine. Group C0.5 patients also underwent lumbar surgery but received intrathecal morphine. Group A0.5 patients underwent long-duration high abdominal surgery and received intrathecal morphine. Anesthesia was maintained with nitrous oxide (60%) in oxygen (40%) and a variable concentration of isoflurane. Isoflurane needs were assessed by averaging six consecutive measurements of end-tidal isoflurane pressure (M30FETiso) taken at intervals of 5 min. Postoperative analgesia was evaluated by means of a visual analog scale that was converted to numerical units (VASn). RESULTS: M30FETiso in group C0 (0.8%) was always higher (p < 0.01) than in the other two groups. M30FETiso in group A0.5 was higher (p < 0.01) than in group C0.5 during the first 150 min of surgery. After 180 min, there were no differences in M30FETiso (0.10-0.16%) between the two groups receiving intrathecal morphine. VASn results (mean +/- SD) in the first 4 hours were higher in group C0 (7.33 +/- 0.6) than in group C0.5 (1.13 +/- 0.35) and group A0.5 (1.07 +/- 0.26). The time of morphine-dependent analgesia was shorter (p < 0.01) in group C0 (0.62 +/- 0.38 hours) than in groups C0.5 (30.4 +/- 5.11 hours) and A0.5 (28 +/- 4.34 hours). There were no significant differences between the two groups receiving intrathecal morphine. CONCLUSIONS: Preanesthetic subarachnoid lumbar injection of 0.5 mg of pure morphine reduced early requirements for isoflurane in lumbar surgery (0.14% after 60 min). This reduction was initially less in patients undergoing abdominal surgery (0.44% at 60 min) but was the same after 150 min. Postoperative analgesia was long-term and independent of type or duration of surgery. There was no respiratory depression after surgery and the incidence of postoperative complications was similar in the two groups that received subarachnoid morphine.     

Influence of timing of administration on the analgesic effect of bupivacaine infiltration in carrageenin-injected rats

BACKGROUND: Recent evidence has suggested that the timing of administration of analgesic drugs could influence their efficacy by reducing the sensitization of the nervous system induced by the nociceptive inputs, but this concept of preemptive analgesia is still debated in both clinical and basic research. METHODS: The model of acute inflammatory pain induced by carrageenin was used to study the influence of timing of administration of bupivacaine (0.2 ml of a 0.5% solution with 0.005 mg/ml epinephrine) on the development of hyperalgesia, edema, and increase in temperature. The animals received bupivacaine 5 min before (BUPI PRE group, n = 20) or 60 min after (BUPI POST group, n = 20) carrageenin (1 ml/kg of 1% solution) was injected into the left hind paw. Two control groups (n = 15 in each) received saline 5 min before or 60 min after administration of carrageenin. Hyperalgesia of the injected paw was evaluated by the vocalization threshold to paw pressure, edema by measuring paw circumference with a thread, and plantar temperature with a thermocouple thermometer. All measurements were done before carrageenin injection then every 30 min thereafter for 240 min. Another series (n = 24), with the same four groups was also evaluated at 24 h. RESULTS: Local injection of bupivacaine 60 min after carrageenin partially reduced the edema and hyperalgesia. The injection of bupivacaine 5 min before carrageenin was more efficient than the delayed injection and reduced hyperalgesia, edema and the increase in temperature temporarily, but did not totally prevent their development. All groups were similar at 240 min and 24 h. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that a slight advantage of infiltration with bupivacaine before injury exists in this carrageenin model of acute inflammatory pain. However, this benefit is limited in time and bupivacaine did not have any preemptive analgesic effect.     

Is there any clinical advantage of increasing the pre-emptive dose of morphine or combining pre-incisional with postoperative morphine administration?

Pre-emptive treatment with an i.v. infusion of morphine 10 mg at induction reduces postoperative analgesic requirement and wound hypersensitivity compared with the same dose administered at the end of operation. Increasing the dose of preemptive morphine may potentially reduce postoperative pain further, while administering morphine at the end of operation, in addition to the beginning, may reduce pain generated by the sensory activity elicited from the wound in the immediate postoperative period. To examine this we have conducted a randomized, double-blind study in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy to compare the effect of morphine 20 mg administered before operation with 10 mg at induction and 10 mg on closure of the peritoneum. Postoperative pain was assessed by visual analogue score (VAS) at rest and on movement and by total morphine consumption administered by patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). Wound sensitivity was assessed by von Frey pain thresholds. Both groups had similar morphine consumption, VAS scores and touch and pain thresholds, and in both, secondary hyperalgesia was prevented. Nausea and vomiting scores were higher in the 20-mg group. There was no significant difference between the two groups and neither regimen appeared to offer obvious clinical advantages compared with a lower dose (10 mg) morphine analgesic strategy. Therefore, there may be a ceiling effect to the production of pre-emptive analgesia by morphine.     

Effects of continuous epidural administration of fentanyl and morphine on postcesarean pain

We studied the effects of continuous epidural administration of fentanyl and morphine with bupivacaine for management of postcesarean pain. Eighteen patients received either bolus epidural administration of fentanyl 100 micrograms or morphine 3 mg with 0.5% bupivacaine 4 ml, followed by continuous infusion of fentanyl 33 micrograms.ml-1 with 0.17% bupivacaine or morphine 0.21 mg.ml-1 with 0.17% bupivacaine for 48 hours, respectively. Pain score was assessed at 0 h, 12h, 24h and 48h after leaving the operating room. Pain score increased significantly and progressively in the fentanyl group. In all cases pruritus was noted. Severe pruritus was observed in the morphine group significantly more than in the fentanyl group. The current results indicate that morphine may be preferable to fentanyl for postcesarean pain control using the present opioid doses.     

Comparison of pre- versus post-incision administration of intrathecal bupivacaine and intrathecal morphine in a rat model of postoperative pain

BACKGROUND: Preclinical studies in experimental animals suggest that preemptive analgesia may improve postoperative pain management. The beneficial effects of preemptive analgesia appear less remarkable clinically. The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of pre- and post-incision administration of intrathecal bupivacaine and intrathecal morphine in a rat model for postoperative pain. METHODS: Rats with intrathecal catheters were anesthetized with halothane, and the surgical field was prepared. A saline vehicle or the test drug was administered 15 min before an incision was made in the plantar aspect of the hindpaw or after the incision was completed. After recovery, mechanical hyperalgesia to punctate and nonpunctate stimuli was measured. Rats were tested on the day of surgery for the first 5 h and each day for 6 days. RESULTS: In saline vehicle-treated rats, the median withdrawal threshold decreased from 522 mN to 54 mN or less, and the response frequency to pressure from application of the plastic disc increased from 0 +/- 0% to 96 +/- 12% or greater after incision. Hyperalgesia was persistent through 2 days after surgery and then gradually returned toward preincision values over the next 4 days. Pre- or postincision administration of either intrathecal morphine or intrathecal bupivacaine reduced hyperalgesia on the day of surgery; at all subsequent times, there were no differences between the saline vehicle groups and the drug treatment groups. There were never any significant differences between pre- and postincision treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Early reduction in pain behaviors either by pre- or postincision management had no impact on subsequent measures of hyperalgesia in this model. These results agree with a number of clinical studies and suggest that incisional pain may be initiated and maintained differently than pain in other models.     

Concentrations of morphine and morphine metabolites in CSF and plasma during continuous subcutaneous morphine administration in cancer pain patients

Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) steady-state concentrations (Css) of morphine (M) and the main metabolites morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) and morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G), were determined by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) in 21 cancer patients treated with chronic subcutaneous morphine infusion. There was a moderate, but statistically significant correlation between the daily dose of morphine and the concentrations of morphine, M3G and M6G in CSF. A poorer correlation to concentrations were seen in plasma. The mean +/- SEM CSF/plasma morphine concentration ratio was 0.36 +/- 0.07. In plasma and CSF, the mean steady state concentration of M3G but not M6G substantially exceeded that of morphine where the mean CSF M/M3G/M6G ratio was 1:15:0.5 (molar basis), and the mean plasma ratio was M/M3G/M6G 1:31:3 (molar basis). The mean M3G and M6G concentrations in CSF were approximately 8 and 10% of those found in plasma, but there was a wide interindividual variation. Plasma concentrations of both morphine glucuronides were positively correlated to serum creatinine. Neither pain intensity, evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS), nor side effects showed any relationship to the CSF M3G concentrations, M3G/M or the M3G/M6G ratios. We conclude that during steady state subcutaneous administration of morphine, there is a large interindividual variation in plasma morphine with poor relationship to the daily administered dose. In CSF this correlation was more evident. Plasma and CSF concentrations of M3G and CSF concentrations of M6G correlated with administered morphine dose. There was an accumulation of both morphine glucuronides in patients with elevated serum creatinine. Measurements of morphine, M3G and M6G in CSF did not show any overt relationship to analgesia or side effects.     

Evaluation of preincisional mexiletine administration to alleviate postoperative pain

Mexiletine, an antiarrhythmic agent, was preincisionally administered intravenously for the purpose of reducing postoperative pain. Twenty-eight female patients for mastectomy were studied. The patients were divided into three groups. Group 1 received no mexiletine. Group 2 received bolus administration of mexiletine 1 mg.kg-1 with additional continuous administration of 1 mg.kg-1.hr-1 for 75 minutes. Group 3 received bolus administration of mexiletine 2 mg.kg-1. The requirement of butorphanol as a postoperative analgesic within 1 hour after mastectomy in Group 3 was significantly lower than that in Group 1 (P < 0.05), but butorphanol requirement in Group 2 was not significantly lower than that in Group 1. Plasma mexiletine concentration was slightly higher in Group 3 (1.7 micrograms.ml-1) than that in Group 2 (1.0 microgram.ml-1) immediately after the intravenous mexiletine administration, although there was no significant difference. The results indicate that mexiletine 2 mg.kg-1 as preoperative bolus administration maintains its plasma concentration above 1.7 micrograms.ml-1, and is clinically effective for reducing the postoperative pain after mastectomy.     

Long-term administration of large doses of oral morphine for chronic pain

We here report a patient with chronic pain who was treated with large doses of oral morphine. A 37-year-old female was diagnosed as Lyme disease and lumbar disc hernia. When she received lumbar puncture for myelography, she fainted due to severe pain in the legs. After this incident, her pain increased markedly, and she visited our outpatient clinic in 1996. After confirming the temporary pain relieving effect of caudal block, we prescribed oral morphine tablets 60 mg daily. The dose of morphine necessary to relieve her pain increased gradually to 220 mg. But she did not develop dependence or side effects. However, when the daily dose of 300 mg was administered, she felt dizzy. We therefore performed lumbar sympathetic block with phenol. After the block, her conditions improved markedly at a dosage of 300 mg. In conclusion, our experience in this case has shown the effectiveness of long-term morphine use with non-cancer patients and the efficacy of nerve block to avoid increasing the morphine dosage.     

Evaluation of the synergism between ketorolac and morphine in the treatment of postoperative pain

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study is to determine what concentration of ketorolac and morphine administered together i.v. achieve best synergic effect between NSAID antiinflammatory and opioids analgesic properties. DESIGN: Randomized comparative study was carried out on 180 patients, ASA II-IV, undergoing major general surgery, in an University Clinic. METHODS: Postoperative pain therapy by i.v. PCA: group 1 morphine 0.75 mg.ml + ketorolac 0.75 mg.ml; group 2 morphine 0.50 mg.ml + ketorolac 1.50 mg.ml; group 3 morphine 0.25 mg.ml + ketorolac 1.50 mg.ml; in saline solution. Initial bolus: 2 ml. Continuous infusion 1.5 ml.h. Demand bolus: 0.2 ml. Lockout time: 30 minutes. Evaluations included: pain intensity (T0, T3, T18); total amount of infused drugs (T18); number of valid demands and attempts (T18); amount of autoadministered analgesic drugs in percent of highest available amount (T18); side effects (T18); patient's judgment. DATA ANALYSIS: ANOVA and Student's "t"-test. RESULTS: A statistically significant reduction of pain intensity was found after 3 and 18 hours in the three groups, no differences were found among the groups. Group 2 required an amount of autoadministered drugs significantly lower than other groups. Rare side effects. Patient's judgment was generally positive. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest a greater synergetic effect between morphine and ketorolac in concentrations used in group 2.     

Extinction of tolerance to the analgesic effect of morphine: Intracerebroventricular administration and effects of stress.

Previous research demonstrated that tolerance to the analgesic effect of morphine in rats is attenuated by administrations of a placebo in the context of drug-associated cues. Such apparent extinction of tolerance has been interpreted as support for a Pavlovian conditioning model of tolerance. Recently, it has been suggested that these findings are attributable to stress, induced during placebo sessions and augmenting the analgesic effect of morphine (rather than to Pavlovian extinction). Our results indicate that placebo sessions actually attenuate tolerance by extinguishing the association between predrug cues and the systemic effects of the drug. In addition, the results indicate that conditioning contributes to analgesic tolerance when morphine is administered intracerebroventricularly, which suggests that conditional alterations within the central nervous system mediate such tolerance. This contrasts with alternative suggestions that conditional alterations in drug distribution or metabolism mediate the effects of conditioning manipulations on tolerance. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Intravenous regional analgesia using morphine. The effect on postoperative pain following total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND: We hypothesised that any peripheral action of morphine may contribute to improved postoperative analgesia. The aim of this study was to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of morphine administered preoperatively into an exsanguinated limb prior to total knee arthroplasty. METHODS: A randomised, double-blind, controlled study was performed in 50 patients having total knee arthroplasty surgery. Patients were divided into two groups. In the study group, 0.125 mg/kg morphine in 60 ml of saline was administered intravenously (iv) into the exsanguinated operative limb via a cannula in the foot. A saline intramuscular (im) injection was administered into the opposite leg. The control group received 60 ml saline iv into the operative leg and 0.125 mg/kg morphine im into the opposite leg. Pain was assessed postoperatively using a 10-point visual analogue scale and by comparing morphine requirements and demand:delivery ratios from a patient-controlled analgesic pump. RESULTS: We found no statistically significant difference between the groups in relation to any of the analgesic measures employed. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous regional analgesia using morphine provides no analgesic advantage over the intramuscular route from 6-24 h postoperatively.     

The cholecystokinin antagonist proglumide enhances the analgesic efficacy of morphine in humans with chronic benign pain

The analgesic efficacy of morphine is sometimes only partial in patients with chronic benign pain. Among the possible factors contributing to this limitation are increased levels of cholecystokinin (CCK). We performed this prospective, placebo-controlled, double-blind, cross-over study to examine the effect of proglumide, a nonspecific CCK agonist, on analgesia in patients taking morphine on a chronic basis. Forty patients with intractable pain who were taking sustained-release morphine were recruited, and we obtained results from 36 of these patients. Median visual analog scale scores before the study were 8 and 7 after the addition of placebo for 2 wk (P = 0.16), and 6 after proglumide for 2 wk (P = 0.002). Mobility was unchanged by proglumide or placebo. Of the 36 patients, 13 elected to continue receiving proglumide after the study. We conclude that proglumide enhances the analgesia produced by morphine in some, but not all, patients with chronic benign pain. IMPLICATIONS: The pain-killing effect of morphine is incomplete in some patients. Increasing doses may be needed to maintain the initial effect. The peptide cholecystokinin may be partially responsible for this. In this study, we demonstrated that the cholecystokinin antagonist proglumide increases the analgesic effect of morphine in some patients with chronic benign pain.     

Comparison of the analgesic effects of diflunisal and paracetamol in the treatment of postoperative dental pain

The search for new effective analgesics without unwanted effects on the coagulation mechanism and a longer duration of activity has been intensified. One such development is diflunisal and the aim of this study was to compare the analgesic effect of diflunisal with that of paracetamol. A combined single dose (500-mg tablets), double-blind, randomized, controlled design in out-patients (n = 104) with moderate or severe pain caused by the surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars was used in this study. Pain intensity and relief were assessed postoperatively for 8h using category-rating scales. The results showed a statistically significant difference in favour of diflunisal in each and every parameter used in determining the efficacy of the treatment.     

Comparison of morphine and morphine with ketamine for postoperative analgesia

In addition to the patient's history and a thorough clinical investigation, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) has been introduced to complete the findings for the diagnosis of internal derangement of the TMJ. However, 'dynamic information' is desirable to help us to understand the mechanism of internal derangement. This information is given for example by electronic axiography recording systems. The lack of any ability to assess joint function dynamically in MRI is a point of criticism. Using a computer-driven pseudodynamic MRI system (CINE mode) 'dynamic information' should be now available. In this investigation 21 patients with TMJ disorders were examined using both conventional static MRI and CINE mode. For the diagnosis of an anterior displaced disc with or without reduction in 18 cases (86%) it was only necessary to consider two static MRIs: a closed mouth position and a maximal open mouth position. Comparison showed there was no advantage in using CINE mode. Contrast and resolution of the static MRIs were shown to be better and so additional findings such as joint effusion and disc deformation could be diagnosed on static MRIs with greater certainty. Only in three (14%) cases was the dynamic information from CINE mode useful for the diagnosis of the displacement of the disc.     

Determination of an effective dose of intrathecal morphine for pain relief after cesarean delivery

Very small doses of intrathecal (i.t.) morphine (25-200 microg) have been used in an effort to provide effective postoperative pain relief while minimizing side effects after cesarean delivery. We performed a double-blinded study in 40 patients presenting for elective cesarean delivery in which i.t. morphine was administered along with oral hydrocodone/acetaminophen and other medications commonly administered after cesarean delivery. We administered i.t. morphine by up-down sequential allocation of doses. For the purposes of this study, adequate postoperative analgesia was defined as comfort not requiring i.v. morphine for 12 h after spinal anesthesia with bupivacaine, fentanyl, and morphine. In addition, a time and cost comparison was performed for study patients receiving intrathecal morphine compared with a historical group of patients receiving patient-controlled analgesia with i.v. morphine. We were unable to determine with meaningful precision a dose of i.t. morphine to provide analgesia in this context. However, very small doses of i.t. morphine combined with oral hydrocodone/acetaminophen and other medications commonly prescribed after cesarean delivery provided postoperative pain relief with no more time commitment than patient-controlled analgesia (148 +/- 61 vs 150 +/- 57 min) and with significantly less acquisition cost ($15.13 +/- $4.40 vs $34.64 +/- $15.55). Implications: When used along with oral analgesics, very small doses of spinal morphine provide adequate pain relief after cesarean delivery. Spinal anesthetics, oral analgesics, and other medications commonly prescribed to treat side effects after cesarean delivery contribute significantly to this analgesia. When small doses of spinal morphine are used in this setting, they provide adequate analgesia and patient satisfaction that is time- and cost-effective.     

Effects of dose, interdose interval, and drug-signal parameters on morphine analgesic tolerance: Implications for current theories of tolerance.

Some unique predictions of a dual-process priming model of morphine analgesic tolerance were tested. Two experiments in which morphine injections during a tolerance acquisition phase were accompanied by nociceptive testing on a hot plate, confirmed the predictions that tolerance acquisition, retention, and environment-specificity would be augmented under signaled drug conditions when low doses or long interdose intervals (IDIs) were used but not when high doses or short IDIs were used. The implications for current alternative theories of morphine tolerance are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)