Maintenance intravenous iron therapy in pediatric hemodialysis patients

Iron supplementation is required for optimal response to erythropoietin (EPO) in hemodialysis patients. This is due to blood lost in the dialysis tubing after dialysis and the increased demand for iron by EPO therapy. Maintenance intravenous (IV) iron was administered according to a standardized protocol to pediatric patients on hemodialysis in our institution. The effect of this protocol on EPO dose, iron indices, anemia, and medication costs was evaluated. Data on two groups of patients were retrieved from the health records. Group 1 (n=14) consisted of patients treated in the 18 months prior to the protocol. These patients received oral iron supplements and occasional IV iron. Group 2 (n=5) consisted of all patients treated with the IV iron protocol. There was no difference in clinical characteristics and mean values for monthly hemoglobin, serum iron, ferritin, and transferrin saturation between groups. The dose of EPO was significantly reduced in group 2 compared with group 1 (193.9±121.4 vs. 73.9±39.0 units/kg per week, P<0.05). Medication costs were reduced by 26% in group 2. No significant adverse events were seen. Maintenance IV iron reduced the dose of EPO required to maintain blood hemoglobin levels. Our results also suggest that maintenance IV iron is a more-economic method of iron supplementation for pediatric hemodialysis patients. Received: 13 November 2000 / Revised: 23 April 2001 / Accepted: 24 April 2001     

口服与静脉铁剂治疗肾性贫血的对比观察

目的观察口服与静脉铁剂在维持性血液透析患者肾性贫血治疗中的应用。方法选择48例合并肾性贫血的维持性血液透析患者为研究对象,随机分为2组,口服组22例,静脉组26例。2组血液透析方案和红细胞生成素用量相同,口服组口服多糖铁复合物300mg／d,静脉组采用静脉滴注低分子右旋糖酐铁100mg／周,观察时间为6个月。结果6个月后,静脉组总有效率高于口服组（P〈0．01）,血红蛋白和血细胞压积高于口服组（P〈0．05）,2组转铁蛋白饱和度、血清铁蛋白及C反应蛋白无显著差异（P〉0．05）,而整体费用支出无显著差异（P〉0．05）。结论对于肾性贫血患者的长期巩固治疗,静脉补铁较口服补铁效果更好,并发症少,且并不增加治疗费用。     

Diagnostic value of iron indices in hemodialysis patients receiving epoetin.

BACKGROUND: Iron deficiency remains a common cause of hyporesponsiveness to epoetin in hemodialysis patients. However, considerable controversy exists regarding the best strategies for diagnosis and treatment. METHODS: As part of a multicenter randomized clinical trial of intravenous versus subcutaneous administration of epoetin, we made monthly determinations of serum iron, total iron binding capacity, percentage transferrin saturation, and serum ferritin. If a patient had serum ferritin <100 ng/mL or the combination of serum ferritin <400 ng/mL and a transferrin saturation <20%, he/she received parenteral iron, given as iron dextran 100 mg at ten consecutive dialysis sessions. We analyzed parenteral iron use during the trial, the effect of its administration on iron indices and epoetin dose, and the ability of the iron indices to predict a reduction in epoetin dose in response to parenteral iron administration. RESULTS: Eighty-seven percent of the 208 patients required parenteral iron to maintain adequate iron stores at an average dose of 1516 mg over 41.7 weeks, or 36 mg/week. Only two of 180 patients experienced serious reactions to intravenous iron administration. Two thirds of the patients receiving parenteral iron had a decrease in their epoetin requirement of at least 30 U/kg/week compared with 29% of patients who did not receive iron (P = 0.004). The average dose decrease 12 weeks after initiating iron therapy was 1763 U/week. A serum ferritin <200 ng/mL had the best positive predictive value (76%) for predicting a response to parenteral iron administration, but it still had limited clinical utility. CONCLUSIONS: Iron deficiency commonly develops during epoetin therapy, and parenteral iron administration may result in a clinically significant reduction in epoetin dose. The use of transferrin saturation or serum ferritin as an indicator for parenteral iron administration has limited utility.     

Efficacy and safety of once-weekly intravenous epoetin alfa in maintaining hemoglobin levels in hemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND: Although an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) is most frequently administered intravenously for treatment of anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease who are on dialysis, few studies have compared the efficacy of different intravenous (i.v.) dosing schedules. METHODS: This multicenter, phase IIIb, open-label, controlled study randomized 289 stable hemodialysis patients to continue with conventional dosing of i.v. epoetin alfa or darbepoetin, or to switch to once-weekly i.v. epoetin alfa at the same cumulative weekly starting dose, to maintain hemoglobin levels at 11.0-13.0 g/dL, and within 1.0 g/dL of the baseline value. Hemoglobin levels and ESA doses were recorded every 4 weeks for 28 weeks. RESULTS: Hemoglobin levels fell significantly and ESA doses increased significantly between baseline and week 28 (mean of week 16-28 values) in the once-weekly epoetin alfa group, compared with the conventional treatment group (p< 0.001). The adjusted difference in mean hemoglobin levels between the groups was 0.73 g/dL (greater than the threshold for therapeutic equivalence of 0.5 g/dL). The changes between groups from baseline was significant at all time points for hemoglobin levels (0.36, 0.46, 0.81, 0.87, 0.78, 0.62 and 0.49 g/dL) and from week 12 for ESA dose (718.5, 1,326.5, 1,732.0, 1,839.7 and 1,959.1 IU/week; p=0.005). Hemoglobin was maintained at the target level in 78% and 84% of patients on conventional dosing, and 67% and 64% of those on once-weekly epoetin alfa in the intention-to-treat (p=0.1) and per protocol (p=0.016) populations, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study did not show therapeutic equivalence of once-weekly i.v. epoetin alfa with conventional dosing regimens.     

Comparison of intravenous ascorbic acid versus intravenous iron for functional iron deficiency in hemodialysis patients

The effect of intravenous ascorbic acid was compared with that of intravenous iron in the treatment of functional iron deficiency, as defined as serum ferritin levels over 300 ng/ml and serum iron levels below 50 microg/dl, in patients on chronic hemodialysis. Thirteen patients on chronic hemodialysis with functional iron deficiency received intravenous injections of ascorbic acid, 100 mg, three times a week, after hemodialysis. The therapy was continued until serum ferritin decreased to below 300 ng/ml (3 months at the maximum). The iron and control group were composed of patients who had serum iron levels below 50 microg/dl within 3 months after serum ferritin rose to over 300 ng/ml. Seven patients with the iron group received more than a total of 10 intravenous injections of saccharated ferric oxide (40 mg/dose) after hemodialysis, and seven patients with the control group received no iron preparation during the 3 months. In the ascorbic acid group, while hemoglobin did not change from 10.9 +/- 0.5 g/dl (mean +/- SE) during the three-month period, serum iron increased significantly from 37 +/- 4 microg/dl to 49 +/- 4 microg/dl after one month (p<0.01), and remained elevated until the end of the three-month period. Serum ferritin decreased significantly from 607 +/- 118 ng/ml to 354 +/- 30 ng/ml after 3 months (p<0.01). In the iron group, hemoglobin and serum iron increased significantly from the respective pre-treatment levels during the 2-month period, and serum ferritin rose significantly after 3 months. In the control group, hemoglobin, serum iron and ferritin levels decreased significantly from the respective pre-treatment levels during the 3 months. The recombinant erythropoietin dose remained stable for three months in the ascorbic acid, iron, and control groups, respectively. These results suggest that in hemodialysis patients with a functional iron deficiency, treatment with intravenous ascorbic acid can prevent iron overload due to treatment with intravenous iron, and provide a useful adjuvant means of maintaining hemoglobin and serum iron levels.     

Serial ferritin concentrations in hemodialysis patients receiving intravenous iron

BACKGROUND: Treatment of the anemia of chronic renal failure with intravenous iron and erythropoietin is highly effective, but frequently leads to ferritin levels which are much higher than those seen in the general population. High ferritin concentrations raise concern about the potential toxicity of increased body iron stores. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated parameters of iron metabolism over a 4-year period among all our chronic hemodialysis patients who had been receiving intravenous iron and erythropoietin. Initially, patients received intermittent infusions of 300 mg intravenous iron x 3 doses for a low ferritin or low percent saturation of total iron binding capacity (TIBC), but this protocol was subsequently changed to weekly or biweekly infusions of 50-100 mg. RESULTS: We observed an improvement in average hemoglobin values, modest increases in serum iron and saturation of iron binding capacity, and a 125% increase in ferritin levels over 4 years. TIBC decreased. Overall, ferritin values increased 79 microg/l for each 1% increase in TIBC saturation. Ten patients with ferritin concentration greater than 1,000 pg/l received a three month course of vitamin C with no decline in the ferritin concentration. CONCLUSION: Current protocols for iron delivery may result in progressive increases in ferritin levels. Concern about the risks of iron overload should temper the quantity of iron used in dialysis programs.     

Weekly low-dose treatment with intravenous iron sucrose maintains iron status and decreases epoetin requirement in iron-replete haemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Haemodialysis patients need sustained treatment with intravenous iron because iron deficiency limits the efficacy of recombinant human epoetin therapy in these patients. However, the optimal intravenous iron maintenance dose has not been established yet. METHODS: We performed a prospective multicentre clinical trial in iron-replete haemodialysis patients to evaluate the efficacy of weekly low-dose (50 mg) intravenous iron sucrose administration for 6 months to maintain the iron status, and to examine the effect on epoetin dosage needed to maintain stable haemoglobin values in these patients. Fifty patients were enrolled in this prospective, open-label, single arm, phase IV study. RESULTS: Forty-two patients (84%) completed the study. After 6 months of intravenous iron sucrose treatment, the mean ferritin value showed a tendency to increase slightly from 405 +/- 159 at baseline to 490 +/- 275 microg/l at the end of the study, but iron, transferrin levels and transferrin saturation did not change. The haemoglobin level remained stable (12 +/- 1.1 at baseline and 12.1 +/- 1.5 g/dl at the end of the study). The mean dose of darbepoetin alfa could be reduced from 0.75 to 0.46 microg/kg/week; epoetin alfa was decreased from 101 to 74 IU/kg/week; and the mean dose of epoetin beta could be reduced from 148 to 131 IU/kg/week at the end of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: A regular 50 mg weekly dosing schedule of iron sucrose maintains stable iron stores and haemoglobin levels in haemodialysed patients and allows considerable dose reductions for epoetins. Low-dose intravenous iron therapy may represent an optimal approach to treat the continuous loss of iron in dialysis patients.     

Very low doses of direct intravenous iron in each session as maintenance therapy in hemodialysis patients

Background: Intravenous (IV) iron supplementation is widely used in hemodialysis (HD) patients to treat their periodic losses. However, the ideal dose and frequency is unknown. The goal of the study is to see if a 20?mg dose of iron IV at the end of each session of HD as iron maintenance is better than the iron prior therapy. We analyze the erythropoiesis activity (EA) and functional iron (FI) after four weeks of treatment.

Methods: In 36 patients, we measure reticulocyte count and content of hemoglobin reticulocyte (CHr) as EA and FI markers, respectively, before and after the treatment. Before the study, 23 patients received another different therapy with IV iron as maintenance therapy.

Results: Reticulocyte count: 49.7?±?23.8?×?10³ before and 47.2?±?17.2?×?10³ after the treatment (p=?0.51). The CHr: 34.8?±?3.7?pg and 34.4?±?3.5?pg, respectively, (p=?0.35), showing an excellent correlation with the other FI markers (serum iron r?=?0.6; p?=?0.001; saturation transferrin r?=?0.49; p?=?0.004); that is not shown with the serum ferritin (r?=?0.23; p?=?0.192) or the hepcidin levels (r?=?0.22; p?=?0.251). There was not a correlation between the C-Reactive Protein, reticulocyte count, and CHr. The 13 patients who did not receive the iron prior to the study showed high FI levels, but not an increased of the serum ferritin or the serum hepcidin levels.

Conclusions: The administration of a small quantity of iron at the end of every HD session keeps the EA and the FI levels and allows reducing the iron overload administered and/or decreasing the iron stores markers in some patients.     

Non-transferrin-bound iron is associated with enhanced Staphylococcus aureus growth in hemodialysis patients receiving intravenous iron sucrose

BACKGROUND: Hemodialysis vascular access infections are most frequently caused by Staphylococcus spp. The purpose of this study was to determine if S. aureus growth is enhanced after administration of IV iron sucrose and to establish a relationship between the appearance of non-transferrin-bound iron (NTBI) and S. aureus growth. METHODS: Serum samples were obtained from 12 hemodialysis patients receiving maintenance doses of 100 mg of iron sucrose at baseline and 5, 30, 90, 220 min and 48 h after iron administration. Assays for NTBI and transferrin saturation were performed. S. aureus isolates were used to inoculate patient serum samples. Bacterial growth was determined by optical density. RESULTS: Six of 12 patients had NTBI present within 30 min of the iron dose. NTBI was present more frequently in patients with baseline transferrin saturation values >30% (p < 0.05). Bacterial growth was significantly greater in patients who had NTBI present at 5, 90 and 220 min after iron administration compared to those who did not have NTBI present. CONCLUSIONS: Doses of 100 mg of iron sucrose are associated with the presence of NTBI and enhanced S. aureus growth.     

Low-dose intravenous iron administration in chronic hemodialysis patients treated with recombinant human erythropoietin

We conducted a prospective study to determine the effect of intravenous low-dose iron administration in chronic hemodialysis patients treated with recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO). Sixteen hemodialysis patients (8 males and 8 females; mean age 63.1+/-9.8 years) on maintenance rHuEPO therapy were included in the study. Patients with <100 ng/ml of ferritin received 50 mg iron during every hemodialysis session. Patients with 100-200 ng/ml of ferritin were given 50 mg iron fortnightly. Iron was not supplemented in patients with ferritin levels >200 ng/ml. Mean hematocrit, serum iron levels and transferrin saturations were significantly higher at 6 and 12 months. There was a significant reduction in weekly rHuEPO doses between the start and the 6th and 12th months. Our study shows intravenous iron administration of 100 mg/month may be sufficient to achieve a satisfactory iron status in dialysis patients on maintenance rHuEPO therapy.     

Ferric gluconate reduces epoetin requirements in hemodialysis patients with elevated ferritin

The Dialysis Patients Response to IV Iron with Elevated Ferritin (DRIVE) study demonstrated the efficacy of intravenous ferric gluconate to improve hemoglobin levels in anemic hemodialysis patients who were receiving adequate epoetin doses and who had ferritin levels between 500 and 1200 ng/ml and transferrin saturation (TSAT) < or = 25%. The DRIVE-II study reported here was a 6-wk observational extension designed to investigate how ferric gluconate impacted epoetin dosage after DRIVE. During DRIVE-II, treating nephrologists and anemia managers adjusted doses of epoetin and intravenous iron as clinically indicated. By the end of observation, patients in the ferric gluconate group required significantly less epoetin than their DRIVE dose (mean change of -7527 +/- 18,021 IU/wk, P = 0.003), whereas the epoetin dose essentially did not change for patients in the control group (mean change of 649 +/- 19,987 IU/wk, P = 0.809). Mean hemoglobin, TSAT, and serum ferritin levels remained higher in the ferric gluconate group than in the control group (P = 0.062, P < 0.001, and P = 0.014, respectively). Over the entire 12-wk study period (DRIVE plus DRIVE-II), the control group experienced significantly more serious adverse events than the ferric gluconate group (incidence rate ratio = 1.73, P = 0.041). In conclusion, ferric gluconate maintains hemoglobin and allows lower epoetin doses in anemic hemodialysis patients with low TSAT and ferritin levels up to 1200 ng/ml.     

Varying intervals of subcutaneous epoetin alfa in hemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND: The optimal subcutaneous (SC) epoetin alfa strategy is unestablished. The individual variability in dose requirements needs consideration. In this study, prolonged intervals were assessed in relation to varying dose requirements. METHODS: The study included 153 hemodialysis (HD) patients on stable SC epoetin alfa. Based on dose requirements, the patients received either 4,000 U (group I, n=51) or 10,000 U (group II, n=102) as whole 1 mL vials at prolonged intervals. The study comprised three 8-week periods: an initial period maintaining the basal regimens, an adjustment period where the intervals were prolonged, and a maintenance period. Alterations in hemoglobin (Hb), weekly doses and intervals in each group were compared. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-seven patients completed the study (48 in group I and 89 in group II). In group I, the mean interval was prolonged from 5.4 +/- 1.9 to 7.8 +/- 3.1 days (p=0,01) with stable Hb and EPO doses. In group II, prolonged intervals were associated with a reduction in mean Hb below target level and a significant increase in EPO doses (p=0,002). Iron deficiency and inflammation could explain the poor response in approximately one-third of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: In HD patients, the optimal injection frequency should be individually adjusted. Prolonged intervals can be applied to patients with low-dose requirements. Observing iron status and inflammation is necessary for optimal response.     

Association of different intravenous iron preparations with risk of bacteremia in maintenance hemodialysis patients

AIM: In vitro evidence suggests that different intravenous iron (i.v. Fe) preparations may be associated with different infection rates. This observational study was to determine if different bacteremia rates are associated with different types or amounts of i.v. Fe preparations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective, single-center study was carried out from April 2001 November 2002, a period in which a global switch from ferric gluconate (FG) to iron sucrose (IS) occurred. During Period I (April 2001 - January 2002) FG was the only i.v. Fe administered in our hemodialysis unit. During Period II (February 2002 - November 2002) IS was the only i.v. Fe administered in our unit. Group A (n = 63) received hemodialysis during both Period I and Period II. Group B (n = 41) received hemodialysis either during Period I or Period II. RESULTS: More bacteremic episodes occurred while IS than while FG was being administered. The adjusted bacteremia incidence rate ratios (IRRs) associated with use of IS vs. FG were 2.92 (95% CI, 1.01 - 8.5) and 2.84 (95% CI 1.32 - 6.09) in Groups A and B, respectively. The adjusted bacteremia IRRs associated with receiving > 2,000 mg of i.v. Fe were 2.42 (95% CI 1.03 - 5.6) and 1.54 (95% CI 0.43 - 5.69) in Groups A and B, respectively. Use of catheters as hemodialysis access increased bacteremia risk in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Use of iron sucrose is associated with higher bacteremia rates than ferric gluconate. The potential association between the cumulative amount of i.v. Fe administered and bacteremia risk is unclear. Randomized clinical trials are needed to verify our findings.     

Comparison of the therapeutic efficacy of epoetin beta and epoetin alfa in maintenance phase hemodialysis patients

In May 2009 for financial reasons, the epoetin product used for hemoglobin (Hb) maintenance in our renal dialysis unit was changed from epoetin beta to epoetin alfa. Although widely believed that the dosage requirements are the same, we undertook a retrospective analysis to investigate whether the dosage requirements in chronic renal failure patients were comparable for both preparations. We studied 128 stable end-stage renal failure patients on hemodialysis (three times per week) receiving erythropoietin therapy to maintain their Hb at 11-12.5 g/dL. Patients were excluded if within the study period they developed signs of infection, bleeding, required blood transfusion, were under-dialyzed, or required hospital admission. Regular monthly Hb concentrations and hematocrit (Hct) levels were measured for each patient. The weekly EPO index (defined as weekly epoetin dose/mean monthly Hct) was derived for each patient, before and after regime change. Of the 128 patients in end-stage renal failure, 79 were included in the study. There was no significant difference between the two preparations in terms of Hct level achieved (p = 0.15). However, the median weekly epoetin dose requirement increased from 6733 (range 750-30,000) IU/week to 9000 (250-30,667) IU/week (p < 0.001). EPO index similarly increased from 20,465 (2500-130,846) IU/week/% to 27,073 (729-98,937) IU/week/% (p < 0.001). Our study showed that a higher dose of epoetin alfa was needed to maintain target Hb concentration.     

Elevated cardiac troponin T in hemodialysis patients receiving more intravenous iron sucrose

Elevated cardiac troponin T (cTnT) has been associated with shorter survival in hemodialysis patients. Moreover, intravenous (IV) iron treatment has been held responsible for oxidative stress and accelerated atherosclerosis in these patients. In the present study, we investigated the relationship between cTnT concentration, IV iron treatment, and parameters of iron status. In addition, parameters of oxidative stress, inflammation, and atherosclerosis were evaluated. Predialysis blood samples of 78 chronic hemodialysis patients were analyzed for cTnT, malondialdehyde, creatine kinase (CK), and CK-isoenzyme MB (CK-MB). In addition, the mean value of predialysis serum samples collected during the last year, were considered for homocysteine, ferritin, iron, iron binding capacity, blood cell counts, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, albumin, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), calcium, phosphate, iPTH, cholesterol, and triglyceride. The quantity of IV iron sucrose administered during the last two years was counted from the patients' files. Echocardiography, all events related to ischemic heart disease, and urine volume were also recorded. Elevated cTnT levels (> or =0.10 ng/mL) were found in 18 patients (23.1%). The amount of iron administered was 2264+/-1871 mg with a range 0-7000 mg. Patients with elevated cTnT levels received more IV iron than those with normal cTnT (3692+/-1771 vs. 1761+/-1595 mg, p<0.001). The serum ferritin level was higher in patients with elevated cTnT (median levels; 477 vs. 288 ng/mL; P<0.05). Patients with elevated cTnT were longer on dialysis compared to those with normal levels (median times; 35.5 vs. 15 months, P<0.01) and regression analysis identified the amount of administered iron as an independent factor for elevated cTnT (P<0.01). Intravenous iron treatment and high ferritin concentration are related to high cTnT level, which has previously been incriminated as a survival marker in hemodialysis patients.     

Low dose intravenous ascorbic acid for erythropoietin-hyporesponsive anemia in diabetic hemodialysis patients with iron overload

BACKGROUND: Recent report demonstrates that inadequate iron mobilization and defective iron utilization may cause recombinant erythropoieitin (rEPO) hyporesponsiveness in hemodialysis (HD) patients with iron overload. The effect of intravenous ascorbic acid (IVAA) in HD patients selected on the basis of iron overload and EPO resistance also has been proven. However, it is uncertain whether IVAA still works in diabetic ESRD patients with hyperferritinemia. Therefore, the aim of this study focusing on diabetic ESRD patients was to analyze the potential effect of low dose IVAA on improvement of anemia and erythropoiesis-related parameters when compared with control period. PATIENTS AND METHOD: This study consisted of 22 chronic hemodialysis patients with type II diabetes in a single dialysis unit. In studies of this type, all eligible patients are followed up, but the primary comparison is still between different sequentially treatment including control period and post-IVAA period in same patients. IVAA patients received ascorbic acid, 100 mg each administered intravenously three times per week for eight weeks of treatment and four months of post-treatment follow-up. RESULTS: The demographic characteristics of 22 diabetic uremic patients show that mean age is 63.6 +/- 10.2 years old. The ratio of sex (M/F) = 10/12. Mean duration of HD is 46.7 +/- 33.2 months. As for the urea kinetic study between these two periods including KT/V, nPCR, and URR, there is no significantly different. As for anemia-related parameters, Hb and Hct increased significantly in post-IVAA period after 3 months compared with control period, while MCV did not increase significantly. Serum ferritin significantly decreased at study completion. The same situation is for iron. As for TS, it significantly increased at one month and further markedly increased at subsequent three months. CONCLUSION: This study has demonstrated that short-term low dose IVAA therapy can facilitate iron release from reticuloendothelial system but also increase iron utilization in diabetic hemodialysis patients with iron overload. Therefore, IVAA is a potential adjuvant therapy to treat erythropoeitin-hyporesponsive anemia in iron-overloaded patients.     

静脉用右旋糖酐氢氧化铁对血液透析患者贫血的疗效

目的采用简明健康测量量表MOS SF-36对维持性血液透析患者在静脉用右旋糖酐氢氧化铁注射液治疗前后生存质量进行评价，以探讨静脉补铁剂对患者贫血和生存质量的干预作用。方法选择慢性肾衰竭行维持性血液透析患者43例，分为静脉用铁剂治疗组（A组）和口服铁剂治疗组（B组），所有患者在纳入研究后采用MOS SF-36量表进行基础评分，在接受静脉补铁治疗10次后再次填写调查表进行评分。结果静脉补铁后患者贫血指标明显改善，与口服补铁患者比较血红蛋白（Hb）升高有统计学差异（P〈0．01），而且静脉补铁患者在生存质量的所有纬度上均较治疗前明显改善，同时与口服补铁患者相比较在生理功能（PF）、总体健康（GH）、活力（VT）、社会功能（SF）、情感职能（RE）、精神健康（MH）等方面具有统计学差异（P〈0．05）。结论静脉补铁剂可有效改善血液液透析患者的贫血状态，提高其患者的生存质量。