[a,b]-factorization of a graph

Let a and b be integers such that 0 ? a ? b. Then a graph G is called an [a, b]-graph if a ? d_G(x) ? b for every x ? V(G), and an [a, b]-factor of a graph is defined to be its spanning subgraph F such that a ? d_F(x) ? b for every vertex x, where d_G(x) and d_F(x) denote the degrees of x in G and F, respectively. If the edges of a graph can be decomposed into [a.b]-factors then we say that the graph is [2a, 2a]-factorable. We prove the following two theorems: (i) a graph G is [2a, 2b)-factorable if and only if G is a [2am,2bm]-graph for some integer m, and (ii) every [8m + 2k, 10m + 2k]-graph is [1,2]-factorable.     

[2,3]-factors in a 3-connected infinite planar graph

For two integersm, n withm<-n, an[m, n]-factorF in a graphG is a spanning subgraph ofG withm<-d _F (v)<-n for allv∈V(F). In 1996, H. Enomoto et al. proved that every 3-connected planar graphG withd _G (v)>-4 for allv∈V(G) contains a [2,3]-factor. In this paper we extend their result to all 3-connected locally finite infinite planar graphs containing no unbounded faces.     

Binding number and Hamiltonian(g, f)-factors in graphs

A(g, f)-factorF of a graphG is called a Hamiltonian(g, f)-factor ifF contains a Hamiltonian cycle. The binding number ofG is defined by $bind(G) = \min \left\{ {\frac{{|N_G (X)|}}{{|X|}}|\not 0 \ne X \subset V(G), N_G (X) \ne V(G)} \right\}$ . Let G be a connected graph, and let a andb be integers such that 4 ≤ a <b. Letg, f be positive integer-valued functions defined onV(G) such that a ≤g(x) < f(x) ≤ b for everyx ∈V(G). In this paper, it is proved that if $bind(G) \geqslant \frac{{(a + b - 5)(n - 1)}}{{(a - 2)n - 3(a + b - 5)}}, \nu (G) \geqslant \frac{{(a + b - 5)^2 }}{{a - 2}}$ and for any nonempty independent subset X ofV(G), thenG has a Hamiltonian(g, f)-factor.     

The Generalized Trotter Operator and Weak Convergence Of Dependent Random Variables in Different Probability Metrics

The Trotter operator-theoretic method for establishing weak convergence of sums of real-valued random variables X _{i i∈N} on a probability space (Ω,A,P) is extended to the situation that the X_i are dependent. For this goal, the generalized Trotter-operator is defined for functions f∈C_b and a sub- σ algebra G ? A by V_X¦G f (y) ? ∫_Rf(x+y) dP_X¦G(x,w). General results concerning the weak convergence of dependent random variables (r.vs.) with rates are presented. Further, the distance V between the distributions P,Q of two random variables X,Y with respect to a function f and a sub-σ algebra G, namely the Trotter-distance V(P,Q;f), defined via the generalized Trotter-operator by V(P,Q;f) = sup_y¦∫_Rf(x+y) d(P?q)(x)¦, is compared with other well-known probability-metrics, which metrize weak convergence, such as the Zolotarev-metric ξ, the Gudynas-metric η, the Levy-metric L or the Prohorov-metric ?. Lastly, the Trotter-distance with rates is shown to be equivalent to weak convergence with rates.     

关于赋权图中重圈的一个范型定理

设G=(V, E; w)为赋权图,定义G中点v的权度d_G^w(v)为G中与v相关联的所有边的权和.该文证明了下述定理: 假设G为满足下列条件的2 -连通赋权图: (i) 对G中任何导出路xyz都有w(xy)=w(yz); (ii)对G中每一个与K_1,3或K_1,3+e同构的导出子图T, T中所有边的权都相等并且min{max{d_G^w(x), d^w_G(y)}:d(x,y)=2,x,y∈ V(T)}≥ c/2. 那么, G中存在哈密尔顿圈或者存在权和至少为 c 的圈. 该结论分别推广了Fan^[5], Bedrossian等人^[2]和Zhang等人^[7]的相关定理     

Comparing the Zagreb indices for graphs with small difference between the maximum and minimum degrees

The first Zagreb index M₁(G) and the second Zagreb index M₂(G) of a (molecular) graph G are defined as M₁(G)=∑_u∈V(G)(d(u))² and M₂(G)=∑_uv∈E(G)d(u)d(v), where d(u) denotes the degree of a vertex u in G. The AutoGraphiX system [M. Aouchiche, J.M. Bonnefoy, A. Fidahoussen, G. Caporossi, P. Hansen, L. Hiesse, J. Lacheré, A. Monhait, Variable neighborhood search for extremal graphs. 14. The AutoGraphiX 2 system, in: L. Liberti, N. Maculan (Eds.), Global Optimization: From Theory to Implementation, Springer, 2005; G. Caporossi, P. Hansen, Variable neighborhood search for extremal graphs: 1 The AutoGraphiX system, Discrete Math. 212 (2000) 29-44; G. Caporossi, P. Hansen, Variable neighborhood search for extremal graphs. 5. Three ways to automate finding conjectures, Discrete Math. 276 (2004) 81-94] conjectured that M₁/n≤M₂/m (where n=|V(G)| and m=|E(G)|) for simple connected graphs. Hansen and Vuki?evi? [P. Hansen, D. Vuki?evi?, Comparing the Zagreb indices, Croat. Chem. Acta 80 (2007) 165-168] proved that it is true for chemical graphs and it does not hold for all graphs. Vuki?evi? and Graovac [D. Vuki?evi?, A. Graovac, Comparing Zagreb M₁ and M₂ indices for acyclic molecules, MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem. 57 (2007) 587-590] proved that it is also true for trees. In this paper, we show that M₁/n≤M₂/m holds for graphs with Δ(G)−δ(G)≤2 and characterize the extremal graphs, the proof of which implies the result in [P. Hansen, D. Vuki?evi?, Comparing the Zagreb indices, Croat. Chem. Acta 80 (2007) 165-168]. We also obtain the result that M₁/n≤M₂/m holds for graphs with Δ(G)−δ(G)≤3 and δ(G)≠2.     

Graph equations for line graphs,total graphs,middle graphs and quasi-total graphs

Let G be a graph with vertex-set V(G) and edge-set X(G). Let L(G) and T(G) denote the line graph and total graph of G. The middle graph M(G) of G is an intersection graph Ω(F) on the vertex-set V(G) of any graph G. Let F = V′(G) ∪ X(G) where V′(G) indicates the family of all one-point subsets of the set V(G), then $\text{M(G) = Ω(F)}$.The quasi-total graph P(G) of G is a graph with vertex-set V(G)∪X(G) and two vertices are adjacent if and only if they correspond to two non-adjacent vertices of G or to two adjacent edges of G or to a vertex and an edge incident to it in G.In this paper we solve graph equations $\text{L(G) ? P(H);}\text{L(G)}\text{? P(H); P(G) ? T(H);}\text{P(G)}\text{? T(H); M(G) ? P(H);}\text{M(G)}\text{? P(H)}$.     

Independence number and minimum degree for fractional ID-k-factor-critical graphs

Let k be an integer with k?≥?1, and let G be a graph. A k-factor of G is a spanning subgraph F of G such that d _F (x)?=?k for each ${x\in V(G)}$ . Let ${h:E(G)\rightarrow[0,1]}$ be a function. If ${\sum_{e\ni x}h(e)=k}$ holds for each ${x\in V(G)}$ , then we call G[F _h ] a fractional k-factor of G with indicator function h, where ${F_h=\{e\in E(G): h(e) >0 \}}$ . A graph G is fractional independent-set-deletable k-factor-critical (in short, fractional ID-k-factor-critical) if G?I has a fractional k-factor for every independent set I of G. In this paper, we prove that if ${\alpha(G)\leq\frac{4k(\delta(G)-k+1)}{k^{2}+6k+1}}$ , then G is fractional ID-k-factor-critical. The result is best possible in some sense.     

On toughness and (g, f)-factors in bipartite graphs

Let G be a bipartite graph andg and f be two positive integer-valued functions defined on vertex setV(G) ofG such thatg(x) ≤ f(x) for anyx ? V(G). In this paper, a new isolated toughness ofG is defined and some sufficient conditions related to the new toughness forG to have (g,f )-factors are obtained. Furthermore, these results are proved to be sharp in some sense.     

Rotation numers for complete bipartite graphs

A rooted graph is a pair (G, x) where G is a simple undirected graph and x ? V(G). If G if rooted at x, then its rotation number h(G, x) is teh minimum number of edges in a graph F, of the same order as G, such that for all v ? V(F) we can find a copy of G in F with the root x at v. Rotation numbers for complete bipartite graphs were itroduced in [4] by Cockayne and Lorimer. Several cases were evaluated by Bollobás and Cockayne in [2], and in this paper we give a full solution.     

Super Edge-connectivity and Zeroth-order General Randić Index for −1 ≤ <Emphasis Type="Italic">α</Emphasis> &lt; 0

Let G be a connected graph with order n, minimum degree δ = δ(G) and edge-connectivity λ = λ(G). A graph G is maximally edge-connected if λ = δ, and super edge-connected if every minimum edgecut consists of edges incident with a vertex of minimum degree. Define the zeroth-order general Randi? index \(R_\alpha ^0\left( G \right) = \sum\limits_{x \in V\left( G \right)} {d_G^\alpha \left( x \right)} \), where d_G(x) denotes the degree of the vertex x. In this paper, we present two sufficient conditions for graphs and triangle-free graphs to be super edge-connected in terms of the zeroth-order general Randi? index for ?1 ≤ α < 0, respectively.     

Moments of Two-Variable Functions and the Uniqueness of Graph Limits

For a symmetric bounded measurable function W on [0, 1]² and a simple graph F, the homomorphism density $t(F,W) = \int _{[0,1]^{V (F)}} \prod_ {i j\in E(F)} W(x_i, x_j)dx .$ can be thought of as a “moment” of W. We prove that every such function is determined by its moments up to a measure preserving transformation of the variables. The main motivation for this result comes from the theory of convergent graph sequences. A sequence (G _n ) of dense graphs is said to be convergent if the probability, t(F, G _n ), that a random map from V(F) into V(G _n ) is a homomorphism converges for every simple graph F. The limiting density can be expressed as t(F, W) for a symmetric bounded measurable function W on [0, 1]². Our results imply in particular that the limit of a convergent graph sequence is unique up to measure preserving transformation.     

Upper bounds on the signed (k, k)-domatic number

Let G be a graph with vertex set V(G), and let f : V(G) → {?1, 1} be a two-valued function. If k ≥ 1 is an integer and ${\sum_{x\in N[v]} f(x) \ge k}$ for each ${v \in V(G)}$ , where N[v] is the closed neighborhood of v, then f is a signed k-dominating function on G. A set {f ₁,f ₂, . . . ,f _d } of distinct signed k-dominating functions on G with the property that ${\sum_{i=1}^d f_i(x) \le k}$ for each ${x \in V(G)}$ , is called a signed (k, k)-dominating family (of functions) on G. The maximum number of functions in a signed (k, k)-dominating family on G is the signed (k, k)-domatic number of G. In this article we mainly present upper bounds on the signed (k, k)-domatic number, in particular for regular graphs.     

Approximation from Above of Systems of Differential Inclusions with Non-Lipschitzian Right-Hand Side

Suppose that ? ⁿ is the p-dimensional space with Euclidean norm ∥ ? ∥, K (? ^p ) is the set of nonempty compact sets in ? ^p , ?₊ = [0, +∞), D = ?₊ × ? ^m × ? ⁿ × [0, a], D ₀ = ?₊ × ? ^m , F ₀: D ₀ → K (? ^m ), and co F ₀ is the convex cover of the mapping F ₀. We consider the Cauchy problem for the system of differential inclusions $$\dot x \in \mu F(t,x,y,\mu ),\quad \dot y \in G(t,x,y,\mu ),\quad x(0) = x_0 ,\quad y(0) = y_0$$ with slow x and fast y variables; here F: D → K (? ^m ), G: D → K (? ⁿ ), and μ ∈ [0, a] is a small parameter. It is assumed that this problem has at least one solution on [0, 1/μ] for all sufficiently small μ ∈ [0, a]. Under certain conditions on F, G, and F ₀, comprising both the usual conditions for approximation problems and some new ones (which are weaker than the Lipschitz property), it is proved that, for any ε > 0, there is a μ₀ > 0 such that for any μ ∈ (0, μ₀] and any solution (x _μ(t), y _μ(t)) of the problem under consideration, there exists a solution u _μ(t) of the problem ${\dot u}$ ∈ μ co F ₀ (t, u), u(0) = x ₀ for which the inequality ∥x _μ(t) ? u _μ(t)∥ < ε holds for each t ∈ [0, 1/μ].     

Goodness of trees for generalized books

A connected graphG is said to beF-good if the Ramsey numberr(F, G) is equal to(x(F) ? 1)(p(G) ? 1) + s(F), wheres(F) is the minimum number of vertices in some color class under all vertex colorings by _χ (F) colors. It is of interest to know which graphsF have the property that all trees areF-good. It is shown that any large tree isK(1, 1,m ₁,m ₂,...,m _t )-good.     

An Introduction to Closed/Open Neighborhood Sums: Minimax, Maximin, and Spread

For a graph G of order |V(G)| = n and a real-valued mapping f:V(G)?\mathbbR{f:V(G)\rightarrow\mathbb{R}}, if S ì V(G){S\subset V(G)} then f(S)=?_{w ? S} f(w){f(S)=\sum_{w\in S} f(w)} is called the weight of S under f. The closed (respectively, open) neighborhood sum of f is the maximum weight of a closed (respectively, open) neighborhood under f, that is, NS[f]=max{f(N[v])|v ? V(G)}{NS[f]={\rm max}\{f(N[v])|v \in V(G)\}} and NS(f)=max{f(N(v))|v ? V(G)}{NS(f)={\rm max}\{f(N(v))|v \in V(G)\}}. The closed (respectively, open) lower neighborhood sum of f is the minimum weight of a closed (respectively, open) neighborhood under f, that is, NS^-[f]=min{f(N[v])|v ? V(G)}{NS^{-}[f]={\rm min}\{f(N[v])|v\in V(G)\}} and NS^-(f)=min{f(N(v))|v ? V(G)}{NS^{-}(f)={\rm min}\{f(N(v))|v\in V(G)\}}. For W ì \mathbbR{W\subset \mathbb{R}}, the closed and open neighborhood sum parameters are NS_W[G]=min{NS[f]|f:V(G)? W{NS_W[G]={\rm min}\{NS[f]|f:V(G)\rightarrow W} is a bijection} and NS_W(G)=min{NS(f)|f:V(G)? W{NS_W(G)={\rm min}\{NS(f)|f:V(G)\rightarrow W} is a bijection}. The lower neighbor sum parameters are NS^-_W[G]=maxNS^-[f]|f:V(G)? W{NS^{-}_W[G]={\rm max}NS^{-}[f]|f:V(G)\rightarrow W} is a bijection} and NS^-_W(G)=maxNS^-(f)|f:V(G)? W{NS^{-}_W(G)={\rm max}NS^{-}(f)|f:V(G)\rightarrow W} is a bijection}. For bijections f:V(G)? {1,2,?,n}{f:V(G)\rightarrow \{1,2,\ldots,n\}} we consider the parameters NS[G], NS(G), NS ⁻[G] and NS ⁻(G), as well as two parameters minimizing the maximum difference in neighborhood sums.     

Well-covered graphs and factors

A maximum independent set of vertices in a graph is a set of pairwise nonadjacent vertices of largest cardinality α. Plummer [Some covering concepts in graphs, J. Combin. Theory 8 (1970) 91-98] defined a graph to be well-covered, if every independent set is contained in a maximum independent set of G. Every well-covered graph G without isolated vertices has a perfect [1,2]-factor F_G, i.e. a spanning subgraph such that each component is 1-regular or 2-regular. Here, we characterize all well-covered graphs G satisfying α(G)=α(F_G) for some perfect [1,2]-factor F_G. This class contains all well-covered graphs G without isolated vertices of order n with α?(n-1)/2, and in particular all very well-covered graphs.     

The {k}-domatic number of a graph

For a positive integer k, a {k}-dominating function of a graph G is a function f from the vertex set V(G) to the set {0, 1, 2, . . . , k} such that for any vertex ${v\in V(G)}$ , the condition ${\sum_{u\in N[v]}f(u)\ge k}$ is fulfilled, where N[v] is the closed neighborhood of v. A {1}-dominating function is the same as ordinary domination. A set {f ₁, f ₂, . . . , f _d } of {k}-dominating functions on G with the property that ${\sum_{i=1}^df_i(v)\le k}$ for each ${v\in V(G)}$ , is called a {k}-dominating family (of functions) on G. The maximum number of functions in a {k}-dominating family on G is the {k}-domatic number of G, denoted by d _{k}(G). Note that d _{1}(G) is the classical domatic number d(G). In this paper we initiate the study of the {k}-domatic number in graphs and we present some bounds for d _{k}(G). Many of the known bounds of d(G) are immediate consequences of our results.     

Comparaison de deux indicateurs de la régularité en variation des queues de distributionsComparison between two indicators for the variation regularity of tails of distributions

We compare assumptions used in [4] in order to study the rate of convergence to 0, as u→s₊(F), of , where $\text{F}{}_{\mathrm{u}}$ is the survival function of the excesses over u, s₊(F)=sup{x,F(x)<1} is the upper end point of the distribution function (d.f.) F and $\text{G}{}_{\mathrm{\gamma }}$ is the survival function of the Generalized Pareto Distribution, with assumptions used in [2] in order to study the rate of convergence to 0, as n→+∞, of $\text{d}\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{=}\text{sup}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>x\in </mtext><mtext>R</mtext>}}\text{|F}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{(x)?H}{}_{\mathrm{\gamma }}\text{(}\text{x?α}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{σ}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{)|}$, where H_γ is the d.f. of an extreme value distribution. In each case, an indicator linked to regular variation assumptions had been introduced. We characterize situations where these two indicators coincide, and others where they are different. To cite this article: R. Worms, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. I 334 (2002) 709–712.     

Bounded factorization property for Fréchet spaces

An operator T ∈ L(E, F) factors over G if T = RS for some S ∈ L(E, G) and R ∈ L(G, F); the set of such operators is denoted by L^G(E, F). A triple (E, G, F) satisfies bounded factorization property (shortly, (E, G, F) ∈ ???) if L^G(E, F) ? LB(E, F), where LB(E, F) is the set of all bounded linear operators from E to F. The relationship (E, G, F) ∈ ??? is characterized in the spirit of Vogt's characterisation of the relationship L(E, F) = LB(E, F) [23]. For triples of K?othe spaces the property ??? is characterized in terms of their K?othe matrices. As an application we prove that in certain cases the relations L(E, G₁) = LB(E, G₁) and L(G₂, F) = LB(G₂, F) imply (E, G, F) ∈ ??? where G is a tensor product of G₁ and G₂.