Tacticity effects on the miscibility behavior of poly(methyl methacrylate)/poly(ethylene oxide-b-dimethylsiloxane-b-ethylene oxide) blends

The miscibility of a triblock copolymer poly(ethylene oxide)-poly(dimethylsiloxane)-poly(ethylene oxide) with syndiotactic and isotactic poly(methylmethacrylate) wasstudied. Although isotactic poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) was miscible with poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) in the pure state, it was immiscible with the PEO end blocks in the copolymer. In comparison, the syndiotactic poly(methyl methacrylate) (sPMMA) was miscible with the PEO blocks as indicated by melting point depression, decrease in crystallinity, and slower rate of spherulite growth of PEO. When blends of the triblock copolymer were cooled to low temperatures, the poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) middle block which resided in the interlamellar region of PEO spherulites also crystallized; the development of PDMS crystals was clearly suppressed at high sPMMA contents.On leave from Union Chemical Laboratories, Industrial Technology Research Institute, Hsinchu, Taiwan     

Study of the miscibility and crystallization behavior of poly(ethylene oxide)/poly(vinyl alcohol) blends

The miscibility and crystallization behavior of poly(ethylene oxide)/poly(vinyl alcohol) (PEO/PVA) blends were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA), and polarizing optical microscopy. Because the glass‐transition temperature of PVA was near the melting point of PEO crystalline, an uncommon DSC procedure was used to determine the glass‐transition temperature of the PVA‐rich phase. From the DSC and DMA results, two glass‐transition temperatures, which corresponded to the PEO‐rich phase and the PVA‐rich phase, were observed. It was an important criterion to indicate that a blend was immiscible. It was also found that the preparation method of samples influenced the morphology and crystallization behaviors of PEO/PVA blends. The domain size of the disperse phase (PVA‐rich) for the solution‐cast blends was much larger than that for the coprecipitated blends. The crystallinity, spherulitic morphology, and isothermal crystallization behavior of PEO in the solution‐cast blends were similar to those of the neat PEO. On the contrary, these properties in the coprecipitated blends were different from those of the neat PEO. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 92: 1562–1568, 2004     

Miscibility and crystallization of poly(ethylene succinate)/poly(vinyl phenol) blends

Miscibility of biodegradable poly(ethylene succinate) (PES)/poly(vinyl phenol) (PVPh) blends has been studied by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) in this work. PES is found to be miscible with PVPh as shown by the existence of single composition dependent glass transition temperature over the entire composition range. Spherulitic morphology and the growth rates of neat and blended PES were investigated by optical microscopy (OM). Both neat and blended PES show a maximum growth rate value in the crystallization temperature range of 45-65 °C, with the growth rate of neat PES being higher than that of blended PES at the same crystallization temperature. The overall crystallization kinetics of neat and blended PES was also studied by DSC and analyzed by the Avrami equation at 60 and 65 °C. The crystallization rate decreases with increasing the temperature for both neat and blended PES. The crystallization rate of blended PES is lower than that of neat PES at the same crystallization temperature. However, the Avrami exponent n is almost the same despite the blend composition and crystallization temperature, indicating that the addition of PVPh does not change the crystallization mechanism of PES but only lowers the crystallization rate.     

Crystallization behavior and mechanical properties of poly(ethylene oxide)/poly(L‐lactide)/poly(vinyl acetate) blends

Poly(vinyl acetate) (PVAc) was added to the crystalline blends of poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) and poly(L ‐lactide) (PLLA) (40/60) of higher molecular weights, whereas diblock and triblock poly(ethylene glycol)–poly(L ‐lactide) copolymers were added to the same blend of moderate molecular weights. The crystallization rate of PLLA of the blend containing PVAc was reduced, as evidenced by X‐ray diffraction measurement. A ringed spherulite morphology of PLLA was observed in the PEO/PLLA/PVAc blend, attributed to the presence of twisted lamellae, and the morphology was affected by the amount of PVAc. A steady increase in the elongation at break in the solution blend with an increase in the PVAc content was observed. The melting behavior of PLLA and PEO in the PEO/PLLA/block copolymer blends was not greatly affected by the block copolymer, and the average size of the dispersed PEO domain was not significantly changed by the block copolymer. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 82: 3618–3626, 2001     

Behavior of flexible poly(vinyl chloride)/poly(hydroxybutyrate valerate) blends

Blends of flexible poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) and a poly(hydroxybutyrate valerate) (PHBV) copolymer were prepared and characterized with different techniques. The tensile strength of PVC did not show a marked reduction at PHBV concentrations up to 50 phr, despite a lack of miscibility between the two polymers. The crystallization of the PHBV copolymer was markedly hindered by the presence of PVC, as calorimetric results revealed. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Behaviour of the miscibility of poly(ethylene oxide)/liquid crystal blends

The microscopic behaviour of blends of poly(ethylene oxide) with two different low molecular weight liquid crystals (LC) was studied in order to evaluate miscibility. One of the liquid crystal components had a phase transition temperature lower than the melting temperature of poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO), and the other a higher value. The low molecular weight liquid crystal components were 4-cyano-4′-n-heptylbiphenyl (7CB) and p-cyanophenyl p-pentyloxybenzoate (pCP). Thermal analysis and polarized optical and scanning electron microscopy were employed. The melting temperature (T_m) depression of PEO increased with LC content in the blend, suggesting that the PEO was miscible with both liquid crystals in the isotropic phase. The spherulitic structural morphology of the semicrystalline components is affected by the presence of liquid crystals. © 1998 SCI.     

Miscibility of C60-end-capped poly(ethylene oxide) with poly(vinyl chloride)

The miscibility of blends of single [60]fullerene (C₆₀)-end-capped poly(ethylene oxide) (FPEO) or double C₆₀-end-capped poly(ethylene oxide) (FPEOF) with poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) has been studied. Similar to poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO), both FPEO and FPEOF are also miscible with PVC over the entire composition range. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy showed the development of a new low-binding-energy Cl2p doublet and a new high-binding-energy O1s peak in FPEO/PVC blends. The results show that the miscibility between FPEO and PVC arises from hydrogen bonding interaction between the α-hydrogen of PVC and the ether oxygen of FPEO. From the melting point depression of PEO, FPEO or FPEOF in the blends, the Flory-Huggins interaction parameters were found to be −0.169, −0.142, −0.093 for PVC/PEO, PVC/FPEO and PVC/FPEOF, respectively, demonstrating that all the three blend systems are miscible in the melt. However, the incorporation of C₆₀ slightly impairs the interaction between PEO and PVC.     

Studies on the miscibility and phase structure in blends of poly(epichlorohydrin) and poly(vinyl acetate)

The miscibility of atactic poly(epichlorohydrin) (aPECH) with poly(vinyl acetate) (PVAc) was examined under two different conditions: (i) in dilute solution, using vicometeric measurements and (ii) as cast films, using differential scanning calorimetric (DSC) and FT-infrared spectroscopy. Phase separation on heating, i.e. lower critical solution temperature (LCST) behavior of the aPECH/PVAc blends was examined by the measurement of transmitted light intensity against temperature. From viscosity measurements, the Krigbaum-Wall polymer-polymer interaction (ΔB) was evaluated. The DSC results show that the aPECH/PVAc blends are miscible as evidenced by the observation of a single composition-dependent glass-transition temperature (T_g) which is well described by the Couchman and Gordon Taylor models. The Flory-Huggins interaction parameter (χ₁₂) calculated from the T_g-method was negative and equal to −0.01, indicating a relatively low interaction strength. The FT-IR results match very well with those of DSC. The cloud point phenomenon is thermodynamically driven but phase separation, once taken place, is diffusion controlled in normal accessible time.     

Miscibility and crystallization in crystalline/crystalline blends of poly(butylene succinate)/poly(ethylene oxide)

Miscibility and crystallization behavior have been investigated in blends of poly(butylene succinate) (PBSU) and poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO), both semicrystalline polymers, by differential scanning calorimetry and optical microscopy. Experimental results indicate that PBSU is miscible with PEO as shown by the existence of single composition dependent glass transition temperature over the entire composition range. In addition, the polymer-polymer interaction parameter, obtained from the melting depression of the high-T_m component PBSU using the Flory-Huggins equation, is composition dependent, and its value is always negative. This indicates that PBSU/PEO blends are thermodynamically miscible in the melt. The morphological study of the isothermal crystallization at 95 °C (where only PBSU crystallized) showed the similar crystallization behavior as in amorphous/crystalline blends. Much more attention has been paid to the crystallization and morphology of the low-T_m component PEO, which was studied through both one-step and two-step crystallization. It was found that the crystallization of PEO was affected clearly by the presence of the crystals of PBSU formed through different crystallization processes. The two components crystallized sequentially not simultaneously when the blends were quenched from the melt directly to 50 °C (one-step crystallization), and the PEO spherulites crystallized within the matrix of the crystals of the preexisted PBSU phase. Crystallization at 95 °C followed by quenching to 50 °C (two-step crystallization) also showed the similar crystallization behavior as in one-step crystallization. However, the radial growth rate of the PEO spherulites was reduced significantly in two-step crystallization than in one-step crystallization.     

Miscibility and interactions in poly(n-propyl methacrylate)/poly(vinyl alcohol) blends

Poly(n-propyl methacrylate) (PPMA) is miscible with poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) over the whole composition range as shown by the existence of a single glass transition temperature in each blend. The interaction between PPMA and PVA was examined by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. The interactions mainly involve the hydroxyl groups of PVA and the carbonyl groups of PPMA. The measurements of proton spin-lattice relaxation time reveal that PPMA and PVA do not mix intimately on a scale of 1-3 nm, but are miscible on a scale of 20-30 nm. A small negative interaction parameter value has been obtained by melting point depression measurement.     

Effects of genistein modification on miscibility and hydrogen bonding interactions in poly(amide)/poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) blends and membrane morphology development during coagulation

Miscibility characteristics of poly(amide):poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) (PA:PVP) blends containing a soybean-derived phytochemical called “genistein” have been investigated using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and polarized optical microscopy (POM). The occurrence of hydrogen bonding in the binary PA/genistein (PA/G) and PVP/genistein (PVP/G) pairs as well as their ternary blends has been confirmed by Fourier transformed infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). On the basis of DSC and POM data, the morphology phase diagram of PA:PVP/G blends is mapped out, which consisted of various coexistence regions such as isotropic, liquid + liquid, liquid + crystal, liquid + liquid + crystal, and solid crystal regions. Subsequently, PA:PVP membranes modified with genistein were prepared by coagulation via solvent (dimethyl sulfoxide, DMSO) and non-solvent (water) exchange. Addition of genistein reduced the miscibility gap of the PA/DMSO/water system. The actual amounts of genistein in the final membranes have been quantified as a function of the genistein in feed. Of particular interest is the development of the gradient cross-sectional porous channels, showing the progressively larger diameters from the surface to the bottom substrate with the progression of solvent/non-solvent exchange or solvent power. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) investigation of the morphologies of the modified membranes revealed that genistein crystals were embedded on the membrane surface as well as in the cross-section even at a very low feed concentration of genistein. A schematic of a coagulation pathway was inscribed inside a prism phase diagram in order to comprehensively illustrate the formation of genistein modified PA:PVP membranes through the solvent/non-solvent exchange process followed by drying.     

Miscibility and interactions in poly(methylthiomethyl methacrylate)/poly(vinyl alcohol) blends

Poly(methylthiomethyl methacrylate) (PMTMA) is miscible with poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) over the whole composition range as shown by the existence of a single glass transition temperature in each blend. The interaction between PMTMA and PVA was examined by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. The interactions mainly involve the hydroxyl groups of PVA and the thioether sulfur atoms of PMTMA, and the involvement of the carbonyl groups of PMTMA in interactions is not significant. The measurements of proton spin-lattice relaxation time reveal that PMTMA and PVA do not mix intimately on a scale of 1-3 nm, but are miscible on a scale of 20-30 nm. In comparison, we have previously found that PMTMA is miscible with poly(p-vinylphenol) and the two polymers mix intimately on a scale of 1-3 nm.     

Tensile,stress-strain and creep rupture properties of poly (vinyl chloride)/poly(neopentyl glycol adipate)/poly(vinylidene fluoride) blends

Poly (vinyl chloride), PVC, and poly(vinylidene fluoride), PVDF, are incompatible polymers. Poly(neopentyl glycol adipate), PDPA, is miscible with both PVC and PVDF. With PDPA acting as a compatibilizer between PVC and PVDF. compatible PVC/PDPA/PVDF blends can be formed at PVDF content of about less than 50wt%. Above 50wt% PVDF the ternary blends exist in two phases exhibiting two glass transition temperatures, T_g, PVC is the main contributor to the mechanical strength while PDPA and PVDF contribute to the elastic properties of these blends. A compatible blend of 55/22.5/22.5 wt% PVC/PDPA/PVDF exhibiting one single T_g appears to show an interesting balance of the properties of the blend components.     

Correlation between interactions, miscibility, and spherulite growth in crystalline/crystalline blends of poly(ethylene oxide) and polyesters

Crystalline/crystalline blend systems of poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) and a homologous series of polyesters, from poly(ethylene adipate) to poly(hexamethylene sebacate), of different CH₂/CO ratios (from 3.0 to 7.0) were examined. Correlation between interactions, miscibility, and spherulite growth rate was discussed. Owing to proximity of blend constituents' T_g's, the miscibility in the crystalline/crystalline blends was mainly justified by thermodynamic and kinetic evidence extracted from characterization of the PEO crystals grown from mixtures of PEO and polyesters at melt state. By overcoming experimental difficulty in assessing the phase behavior of two crystalline polymers with closely spaced T_g's, this work has further extended the range of polyesters that can be miscible with PEO. The interaction parameters (χ₁₂) for miscible blends of PEO with polyesters [poly(ethylene adipate), poly(propylene adipate), poly(butylene adipate), and poly(ethylene azelate) with CH₂/CO = 3.0-4.5] are all negative but the values vary with the polyester structures, with a maximum for the blend of PEO/poly(propylene adipate) (CH₂/CO = 3.5). The values of interactions are apparently dependent on the structures of the polyester constituent in the blends; interaction strength for the miscible PEO/polyester systems correlate in the same trend with the PEO crystal growth rates in the blends.     

Influence of molecular interactions on spherulite morphology in miscible poly(ethylene oxide)/epoxy network versus poly(ethylene oxide)/poly(4‐vinyl phenol) blend

Relationships between the spherulite morphology and changes in hydrogen‐bonding interactions between the linear poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) polymer and a crosslinking epoxy system (diglycidylether of bisphenol‐A resin with 4,4′‐diaminodiphenylsulfone) (DGEBA/DDS) before and after cure have been explored The hydrogen‐bonding interaction is more significant before cure because of the interactions between the ether group of PEO and the amine group of DDS. The interaction between PEO and epoxy/DDS becomes less in the cured network. The morphology of the PEO crystals is, in turn, affected by the contents and chemical structures (functional groups, molecular weights, crosslinks, etc) of crosslinking epoxy/DDS. PEO/poly(4‐vinyl phenol) (PVPh), a thermoplastic non‐curing miscible system with the hydrogen bonding between the ether group of PEO and the ? OH group of PVPh, is also compared. In comparison with the PEO/epoxy/DDS system, the spherulite morphology of PEO/PVPh becomes more extensively spread out, with the extents increasing with the PVPh contents in the PEO/PVPh blend. © 2001 Society of Chemical Industry     

Poly(hydroxybutyrate)/poly(butylene succinate) blends: miscibility and nonisothermal crystallization

Four blends of poly(hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) and poly(butylene succinate) (PBSU), both biodegradable semicrystalline polyesters, were prepared with the ratio of PHB/PBSU ranging from 80/20 to 20/80 by co-dissolving the two polyesters in N,N-dimethylformamide and casting the mixture. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and optical microscopy (OM) were used to probe the miscibility of PHB/PBSU blends. Experimental results indicated that PHB showed some limited miscibility with PBSU for PHB/PBSU 20/80 blend as evidenced by the small change in the glass transition temperature and the depression of the equilibrium melting point temperature of the high melting point component PHB. However, PHB showed immiscibility with PBSU for the other three blends as shown by the existence of unchanged composition independent glass transition temperature and the biphasic melt. Nonisothermal crystallization of PHB/PBSU blends was investigated by DSC using various cooling rates from 2.5 to 10 °C/min. During the nonisothermal crystallization, despite the cooling rates used two crystallization peak temperatures were found for PHB/PBSU 40/60 and 60/40 blends, corresponding to the crystallization of PHB and PBSU, respectively, whereas only one crystallization peak temperature was observed for PHB/PBSU 80/20 and 20/80 blends. However, it was found that after the nonisothermal crystallization the crystals of PHB and PBSU actually co-existed in PHB/PBSU 80/20 and 20/80 blends from the two melting endotherms observed in the subsequent DSC melting traces, corresponding to the melting of PHB and PBSU crystals, respectively. The subsequent melting behavior was also studied after the nonisothermal crystallization. In some cases, double melting behavior was found for both PHB and PBSU, which was influenced by the cooling rates used and the blend composition.     

Miscibility in poly(vinyl chloride)/chlorinated poly(vinyl chloride) blends,and blends of different chlorinated poly(vinyl chlorides)

Blends of poly(vinyl chloride) with chlorinated poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC), and blends of different chlorinated poly(vinyl chlorides) (CPVC) provide an opportunity to examine systematically the effect that small changes in chemical structure have on polymer-polymer miscibility. Phase diagrams of PVC/CPVC blends have been determined for CPVC's containing 62 to 38 percent chlorine. The characteristics of binary blends of CPVC's of different chlorine contents have also been examined using differential calorimetry (DSC) and transmission electron microscopy. Their mutual solubility has been found to be very sensitive to their differences in mole percent CCl₂ groups and degree of chlorination. In metastable binary blends of CPVC's possessing single glass transition temperatures (T_g) the rate of phase separation, as followed by DSC, was found to be relatively slow at temperatures 45 to 65° above the T_g of the blend.     

Miscibility and thermal behavior of poly(vinyl chloride)/feather keratin blends

Various poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC)/feather keratin (FK) blends were prepared via a solution blending method in the presence of N,N‐dimethylformamide as a solvent. The miscibility of the blends was studied with different analytical methods, such as dilute solution viscometry, differential scanning calorimetry, refractometry, and atomic force microscopy. According to the results obtained from these techniques, it was concluded that the PVC/FK blend was miscible in all the studied compositions. Specific interactions between carbonyl groups of the FK structure and hydrogen from the chlorine‐containing carbon of the PVC were found to be responsible for the observed miscibility on the basis of Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Furthermore, increasing the FK content in the blends resulted in their miscibility enhancement. The thermal stability of the samples, as an important characteristic of biobased polymer blends, was finally examined in terms of their FK weight percentage and application temperature. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Comparison of the toughening mechanisms of poly(vinyl chloride)/chlorinated polyethylene and poly(vinyl chloride)/acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene copolymer blends

In this study, the influence of chlorinated polyethylene (CPE) and acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene copolymer (ABS) on the mechanical properties of poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC)/CPE and PVC/ABS hybrids were examined. The experimental results show that the toughness of the hybrids could be modified greatly by the introduction of CPE or ABS. The microstructure and impact surfaces of the blends were investigated by scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy. ABS dispersed in the form of particles or agglomerates in the PVC matrix, and CPE tended to disperse as a net structure. In the tensile test, ABS initiated crazes as stress concentrators to toughen the PVC matrix, whereas CPE, with the PVC matrix together, caused a yield deformation by shear stress to form a shear band. The formation of crazes and shear bands benefited the toughening of PVC, but to the different extent. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 90: 916–924, 2003