Inter‐individual variation of the urinary steroid profiles in Swedish and Norwegian athletes

The steroidal module of the Athlete Biological Passport (ABP) aims to detect doping with endogenous steroids, e.g. testosterone (T), by longitudinally monitoring several biomarkers. These biomarkers are ratios combined into urinary concentrations of testosterone and metabolically related steroids. However, it is evident after 5 years of monitoring steroid passports that there are large variations in the steroid ratios complicating its interpretation. In this study, we used over 11000 urinary steroid profiles from Swedish and Norwegian athletes to determine both the inter‐ and intra‐individual variations of all steroids and ratios in the steroidal passport. Furthermore, we investigated if the inter‐individual variations could be associated with factors such as gender, type of sport, age, time of day, time of year, and if the urine was collected in or out of competition. We show that there are factors reported in today's doping tests that significantly affect the steroid profiles. The factors with the largest influence on the steroid profile were the type of sport classification that the athlete belonged to as well as whether the urine was collected in or out of competition. There were also significant differences based on what time of day and time of year the urine sample was collected. Whether these significant changes are relevant when longitudinally monitoring athletes in the steroidal module of the ABP should be evaluated further.     

Impact of hormonal contraceptives on urinary steroid profile in relation to serum hormone changes and CYP17A1 polymorphism

To detect doping with endogenous steroids, six urinary steroids are longitudinally monitored in the athlete biological passport (ABP). These steroids include testosterone, etiocholanolone, androsterone, 5α‐androstane‐3α,17β‐diol, 5β‐androstane‐3α,17β‐diol, and the testosterone isomer epitestosterone. It is known that the intake of hormonal contraceptives may interfere with the ABP biomarkers. A previous study showed that athletes using hormonal contraceptives (HCs) display lower urinary epitestosterone concentrations than non‐using athletes. In this study, we analyzed the urinary steroid profile prior to and three months after administration of an oral HC including levonorgestrel and ethinylestradiol (n = 55). The urinary concentrations of all the ABP metabolites decreased after three months, with epitestosterone showing the largest decline (median 6.78 to 3.04 ng/mL, p?0.0001) followed by 5α‐androstane‐3α,17β‐diol (median 23.5 to 12.83 ng/mL, p?0.0001), and testosterone (median 5.32 to 3.66, p?0.0001). Epitestosterone is included in two of the five ratios in the ABP (T/E and 5αAdiol/E), and consequently these ratios increased 1.7‐fold (range 0.27 to 8.50) and 1.26‐fold (range 0.14 to 5.91), respectively. Some of these changes may mimic the changes seen after administration of endogenous steroids leading to atypical findings. Notably, even though participants used the same contraceptive treatment schedule, the HC‐mediated epitestosterone change varied to a large extent (median 0.43‐fold, range 0.06 to 6.5) and were associated with a functional T?C promoter polymorphism in CYP17A1. Moreover, the epitestosterone changes correlated with HC‐induced testosterone and gonadotropins changes in serum, indicating that urinary epitestosterone reflects the androgen load in HC‐using women.     

Studies of athlete biological passport biomarkers and clinical parameters in male and female users of anabolic androgenic steroids and other doping agents

The use of anabolic androgenic steroids (AAS) and other performance enhancing substances can change over time, so there is a need to constantly update what substances are used and can be detected. Six women and 30 men anabolic androgenic steroid users were recruited who filled out an anonymous questionnaire about their use of performance enhancing substances during the past year. Sampling took place on a single occasion and included blood and urine collection. Our aim was to identify which doping agents can be detected in men and women self‐reporting AAS use. The first choice of substances differed between men (testosterone) and women (oxandrolone). The use of growth hormones was reported among men (10%) and women (50%). Growth hormone releasing factors/secretagogs were reported by about ~ 20% in both genders. Nandrolone was the most frequently detected anabolic androgenic steroid even in those who did not report use in the past year. Of the current male testosterone users, 82% exhibited testosterone/epitestosterone (T/E) ratios of > 4. Men with current testosterone use displayed 4‐fold and 6‐fold higher median T/E, respectively, when compared with recent and previous testosterone users (P = 0.0001). Dermal testosterone use in women (n = 2) was not associated with a T/E ratio of > 4, but with supra‐physiological total serum testosterone concentrations. Changes in gonadotropins and hematological parameters were associated with the time of the last anabolic androgenic steroid intake in men, whereas in women these biomarkers were within the normal range. This highlights gender specific differences and indicates the need for additional biomarkers in female athletes.     

Changes in blood parameters after intramuscular testosterone ester injections – Implications for anti‐doping

Testosterone treatment stimulates the production of red blood cells and alters iron homeostasis. Thus, we investigated whether the ‘haematological module’ of the athlete biological passport (ABP) used by the World Anti‐Doping Agency can be used to indicate misuse of testosterone. Nineteen eugonadal men received intramuscular injections of either 250 mg Sustanon®, a blend of four testosterone esters, or placebo on days 0 and 21 in a randomized, placebo‐controlleddouble‐blind design. Urine samples and blood samples were collected twice pre‐treatment, at least 5 days apart, and on days 1, 3, 5, 10 and 14 post‐injections to assess steroidal and haematological biomarkers of the ABP. The steroidal profile was flagged suspicious in all Sustanon®‐treated subjects, whereas the haematological profile was flagged suspicious in six out of nine subjects. When both sensitivity and specificity were considered, reticulocyte percentage (RET%) appeared as the best marker of the haematological module for implying testosterone ester misuse. Atypical blood passport samples were used to select time points for further isotope‐ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS) analysis of testosterone and its metabolites in simultaneously collected urine. In addition to the testosterone (T) to epitestosterone (E) ratio, the RET% and OFF‐Score could help identify suspicious samples for more targeted IRMS testing. The results demonstrate that unexpected fluctuations in RET% can indicate testosterone doping if samples are collected 3–10 days after injection. From an anti‐doping perspective, the haematological and steroidal modules of the ABP should complement each other when planning targeted follow‐up testing and substantiating likely misuse of testosterone.     

Sensitivity of doping biomarkers after administration of a single dose testosterone gel

Micro‐doping with testosterone (T) is challenging to detect with the current doping tests. Today, the methods available to detect T are longitudinally monitoring of urine biomarkers in the Athlete Biological Passport (ABP) and measuring the isotopic composition of excreted biomarkers to distinguish the origin of the molecule. In this study, we investigated the detectability of a single dose of 100 mg T gel in 8 healthy male subjects. We also studied which biomarkers were most sensitive to T gel administration, including blood biomarkers. The ABP successfully detected T gel administration in all 8 subjects. The most sensitive ratio was 5αAdiol/E, however, all ratios showed atypical findings. Isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS) was performed on 5 subjects and only 2 met all the criteria for a positive test according to the rules set by the World Anti‐Doping Agency (WADA). The other 3 showed inconclusive results. Other markers that were affected by T gel administration, not used for this detection today, were serum dihydrotestosterone (DHT) and T as well as reticulocyte count and percentage in whole blood. miRNA‐122 was not significantly affected by the single T dose. A single dose of 100 mg T gel is possible to detect with today's doping tests. Since a single dose of T gel has an impact on some hematological biomarkers, access to both modules of the ABP when evaluating the athletes' profiles will increase the possibility to detect micro‐doses of T. In addition, serum DHT and T may be a useful addition to the future endocrine module of the ABP.     

Codeine influences the serum and urinary profile of endogenous androgens but does not interact with the excretion rate of administered testosterone

Today's doping tests involve longitudinal monitoring of urinary steroids including the testosterone glucuronide and epitestosterone glucuronide ratio (T/E) in an Athlete Biological Passport (ABP). The aim of this study was to investigate the possible influence of short‐term use of codeine on the urinary excretion of androgen metabolites included in the steroidal module of the passport prior to and after the co‐administration with testosterone. The study was designed as an open study with the subjects being their own control. Fifteen healthy male volunteers received therapeutic doses of codeine (Kodein Meda) for 6 days. On Day 3, 500 mg or 125 mg of testosterone enanthate (Testoviron®‐Depot) was administered. Spot urine samples were collected for 17 days, and blood samples were collected at baseline, 3, 6, and 14 days after codeine intake. The circulatory concentration of total testosterone decreased significantly by 20% after 3 days' use of codeine (p = 0.0002) and an atypical ABP result was noted in one of the subjects. On the other hand, the concomitant use of codeine and testosterone did not affect the elevated urinary T/E ratio. In 75% of the individuals, the concentration of urinary morphine (a metabolite of codeine) was above the decision limit for morphine. One of the participants displayed a morphine/codeine ratio of 1.7 after codeine treatment, indicative of morphine abuse. In conclusion, our study shows that codeine interferes with the endogenous testosterone concentration. As a result, the urinary steroid profile may lead to atypical findings in the doping test.     

Fluctuations in hematological athlete biological passport biomarkers in relation to the menstrual cycle

The interpretation of athlete biological passport (ABP) is strengthened by understanding the natural fluctuations in its biological parameters. Here we have assessed the influence of the menstrual cycle on the hematological module of the ABP. Seventeen women with regular menses were included. Blood samples were collected once a week for two consecutive cycles and analyzed for hematological parameters. Menstrual phases were hormonally determined. The intra‐individual variation in the hematological parameters was similar between the two cycles. Reticulocyte percentage was significantly lower in the follicle phase (median 0.95%) than in the ovulatory (median 1.10%) and luteal phases (median 1.16%), P = 0.006, whereas no differences were found in hemoglobin concentration, hematocrit, red blood cell count, or red blood cell indices. When the values were entered into the ABP model, findings outside the program‐calculated individual thresholds were identified in two participants. One woman showed an atypical low OFF‐score in the last sample collected, mainly because of increased reticulocyte percentage. This was likely a response to treated insufficient iron stores. One woman displayed an atypical hemoglobin value at the lower limit 2 weeks after ovulation, which was likely due to fluctuations in plasma volume. In conclusion, the ABP parameters in general are stable throughout the menstrual cycle. Significant differences between the menstrual phases were found in reticulocytes; however, the variation was not related to findings outside the individual thresholds, except in one individual. Moreover, our results highlight the importance of having information about iron supplementation available when evaluating hematological passports.     

Reticulocytes in athletes: Longitudinal aspects and the influence of long- and short-term exercise

Reticulocytes (Ret) are a key variable in the emerging concept of the athlete's biological passport and the longitudinal monitoring of biological parameters in the field of anti-doping. In this context, knowledge on the variability of Ret in athletes and the influence of exercise is necessary. The aim of the present study was to evaluate longitudinal variation in Ret and the influence of short- and long-term exercise.Ret% in 793 samples of 238 athletes were determined and analyzed in different study parts for inter- and intra-individual variation and the impact of long- (competitive season) and short-term (all out) exercise.Median Ret% was 0.9 (CI(0.5-99.5%) 0.4-2.7). Intra-individual variation for Ret% was 0.0118; inter-individual variation 0.0124. During periods of intensive exercise Ret% was slightly lower (mean - 0.1%, p = 0.048). After a short, all-out exercise bout, Ret% was increased (+0.5%, p = 0.0028).Athletes mostly display similar Ret% than the normal population; however, intra-individual variation in athletes is higher. During the competitive season of endurance athletes, Ret% is slightly decreased. After short bouts of intense exercise Ret% is increased. These data can be used for the interpretation of blood profiles in athletes.     

Multivariate interpretation of the urinary steroid profile and training‐induced modifications. The case study of a Marathon runner

The steroidal module of the athlete biological passport (ABP) introduced by the World Anti‐Doping Agency (WADA) in 2014 includes six endogenous androgenic steroids and five of their concentration ratios, monitored in urine samples collected repeatedly from the same athlete, whose values are interpreted by a Bayesian model on the basis of intra‐individual variability. The same steroid profile, plus dihydrotestosterone (DHT) and DHEA, was determined in 198 urine samples collected from an amateur marathon runner monitored over three months preceding an international competition. Two to three samples were collected each day and subsequently analyzed by a fully validated gas chromatography–mass spectrometry protocol. The objective of the study was to identify the potential effects of physical activity at different intensity levels on the physiological steroid profile of the athlete. The results were interpreted using principal component analysis and Hotelling's T² vs Q residuals plots, and were compared with a profile model based on the samples collected after rest. The urine samples collected after activity of moderate or high intensity, in terms of cardiac frequency and/or distance run, proved to modify the basal steroid profile, with particular enhancement of testosterone, epitestosterone, and 5α‐androstane‐3α,17β‐diol. In contrast, all steroid concentration ratios were apparently not modified by intense exercise. The alteration of steroid profiles seemingly lasted for few hours, as most of the samples collected 6 or more hours after training showed profiles compatible with the “after rest” model. These observations issue a warning about the ABP results obtained immediately post‐competition.     

Re-evaluation of combined ((ES/EG)/(TS/TG)) ratio as a marker of testosterone intake in men

To detect doping with pseudo-endogenous anabolic steroids in sports, a urinary steroid profile with glucuronidated plus unconjugated androgens is used. In addition to analyze androgen glucuronide metabolites, it can be of interest to also include sulfate metabolites in the urinary steroid profile. The combined ratios of epitestosterone sulfate/epitestosterone glucuronide to the ratios of testosterone sulfate/testosterone glucuronide ((ES/EG)/(TS/TG)) have previously been investigated as a complementary biomarker for testosterone doping. In this restudy, the aim was to evaluate this biomarker in a larger study sample population. A single dose of 500-mg testosterone enanthate was administered to 54 healthy male volunteers. Urine was collected prior to (Day 0) administration and throughout 15 days and analyzed for the sulfate and glucuronide conjugates of testosterone and epitestosterone. The results show that the combined ratio increased to a larger extent than the traditional T/E ratio in all subjects. This increase was independent on UGT2B17 gene polymorphism. Moreover, a delayed peak of the combined ratio was observed in ~60% of the participants. The results confirm that complementary analyses of the sulfate metabolites may be a useful approach to detect testosterone doping in men.     

Effect of glucocorticoid administration on the steroid profile

The steroid profile (SP) is a powerful tool to detect the misuse of endogenous anabolic androgenic steroids in sports, and it is included in the Athlete Biological Passport (ABP). Glucocorticoids (GCs), which are widely prescribed in sports and only prohibited in competition by systemic routes, inhibit the hypothalamic‐pituitary‐adrenal axis. Since the metabolites monitored in the SP have a partial adrenal origin, their excretion in urine might be altered by GCs consumption. The aim of the present work was to investigate if GCs administered by either systemic or local routes could influence the SP parameters. Three of the most frequently detected GCs in sports (prednisolone, betamethasone, and triamcinolone acetonide) were administered to healthy male and female volunteers (n=40) using different administration routes (topical, oral, and intramuscular administration at different doses). In total, 66 administrations of GCs were performed. Urine samples were collected before and after GCs administration. The SP was measured using gas chromatography‐mass spectrometry. The excretion rates of the SP metabolites decreased after systemic GCs administration. This excretion decrease showed to be associated with the dose and the administration route. However, the individual evaluation of the SP ratios (T/E, A/T, A/Etio, 5αAdiol/5βAdiol, and 5αAdiol/E) led to normal sequences for all the conditions tested. Therefore, GCs administration did not produce misinterpretations on the ABP evaluation. According to these results, GCs administration should not distort the establishment of normal ranges of the SP ratios, and does not need to be considered a confounding factor in the SP evaluation.     

Thirteen years of the fight against doping in figures

Every year, the World Anti‐Doping Agency (WADA) publishes the main statistics reported by the accredited laboratories, which provide very valuable information for assessing changes in the patterns of doping in sports over time. Using the information provided since 2003 as the basis for the analysis, the evolution of doping/anti‐doping figures over the last decade can be examined in reasonable detail, at least in reference to samples analyzed and categories of substances more commonly found in athletes' samples. This brief analysis of the WADA statistical reports leads us to the following outcomes: the increase in anti‐doping pressure from 2003 to 2015, as evidenced by increased numbers of samples analyzed and banned substances, has not directly produced a higher frequency of adverse/atypical findings. Although this could be interpreted as steady state in the capacity to detect doping through this whole period, it also resulted in a significant increase in the absolute number of samples catalogued as doping (from 2247 in 2003 to 5912 in 2015). Anabolic agents have been the most common doping substances detected in all statistics reports while the remaining groups of substances are much less frequently found in doping control samples. Given that one might have expected the enhancement of the anti‐doping programme led by WADA over this last decade to have increased the percentage of adverse/atypical findings, the fact that it did not might indicate the need to take another step in sampling strategies, such as ‘more intelligent testing’ based on the differences in the prevalence of doping substances among sports. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Evaluation of longitudinal steroid profiles from male football players in UEFA competitions between 2008 and 2013

Testosterone and related compounds are the most recurrent doping substances. The steroid profile, consisting of the quantification of testosterone and its metabolites, has been described as the most significant biomarker to detect doping with pseudo‐endogenous anabolic steroids. The steroidal module of the Athlete Biological Passport (ABP) was launched by the World Anti‐Doping Agency (WADA) in 2014. To assess the value of introducing the module to its anti‐doping programme, the Union of European Football Associations (UEFA) decided to analyze retrospectively the steroid profile data of 4195 urine samples, collected from 879 male football players and analyzed in 12 WADA‐accredited laboratories between 2008 and mid‐2013. This study focused on the evaluation of T/E ratios. The coefficient of variation (CV) and the adaptive model were the two statistical models used to study the longitudinal follow‐up. A CV of 46% was determined to be the maximal natural intra‐individual variation of the T/E when the sequence consisted of single data points analyzed in different laboratories. The adaptive model showed some profiles with an atypical T/E sequence and also enabled an estimate of the prevalence of external factors impacting the T/E sequences. Despite the limitations of this retrospective study, it clearly showed that the longitudinal and individual follow‐up of the T/E biomarker of the players is a good tool for target testing in football. UEFA has therefore decided to implement the steroidal module of the ABP from the start of the next European football season in September 2015. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

The effect of athletes` hyperhydration on the urinary ‘steroid profile’ markers in doping control analysis

The urinary ‘steroid profile’ in doping control analysis is a powerful tool aimed at detecting intra‐individual deviations related to the abuse of endogenous steroids. Factors altering the steroid profile include, among others, the excessive fluid intake leading to low endogenous steroids concentrations compared to an individual's normal values. Cases report the use of hyperhydration by athletes as a masking method during anti‐doping urine sample collection. Seven healthy physically active non‐smoking Caucasian males were examined for a 72‐hour period using water and a commercial sports drink as hyperhydration agents (20 mL/kg body weight). Urine samples were collected and analyzed according to World Anti‐Doping Agency (WADA) technical documents. Although, significant differences were observed on the endogenous steroid concentrations under the studied hyperhydration conditions, specific gravity adjustment based on a reference value of 1.020 can eliminate the dilution induced effect. Adjustment methods based on creatinine and urinary flow rate were also examined; however, specific gravity was the optimum method in terms of effectiveness to adjust concentrations close to the baseline steroid profile and practicability. No significant effect on the urinary steroid ratios was observed with variability values within 30% of the mean for the majority of data. Furthermore, no masking on the detection ability of endogenous steroids was observed due to hyperhydration. It can be concluded that any deviation on the endogenous steroid concentrations due to excessive fluid intake can be compensated by the specific gravity adjustment and therefore, hyperhydration is not effective as a masking method on the detection of the abuse of endogenous steroids.     

Long-term stability study and evaluation of intact steroid conjugate ratios after the administration of endogenous steroids

The most frequently detected substances prohibited by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) belong to the anabolic steroids class. The most challenging compounds among this class are the endogenous anabolic steroids, which are detected by quantitative measurement of testosterone (T) and its metabolites with a so-called “steroid profiling” method. The current steroid profile is based on the concentrations and ratios of the sum of free and glucuronidated steroids. Recently, our group developed a steroid profiling method for the detection of three free steroids and 14 intact steroid conjugates, including both the glucuronic acid conjugated and sulfated fraction. The study aimed at evaluating the long-term stability of steroid conjugate concentrations and ratios, and the influence of different endogenous steroids on this extended steroid profile. A single dose of oral T undecanoate (TU), topical T gel, topical dihydrotestosterone (DHT) gel, and oral dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) was administered to six healthy male volunteers. One additional volunteer with a homozygote deletion of the UGT2B17 gene (del/del genotype) received a single topical dose of T gel. An intramuscular dose of TU was administered to another volunteer. To avoid fluctuation of steroid concentrations caused by variations in urinary flow rates, steroid ratios were calculated and evaluated as possible biomarkers for the detection of endogenous steroid abuse with low doses. Overall, sulfates do not have substantial additional value in prolonging detection times for the investigated endogenous steroids and administration doses. The already monitored glucuronides were overall the best markers and were sufficient to detect the administered steroids.     

Sensitivity and specificity of detection methods for erythropoietin doping in cyclists

Recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) is used as doping a substance. Anti‐doping efforts include urine and blood testing and monitoring the athlete biological passport (ABP). As data on the performance of these methods are incomplete, this study aimed to evaluate the performance of two common urine assays and the ABP. In a randomized, double‐blinded, placebo‐controlled trial, 48 trained cyclists received a mean dose of 6000 IU rHuEPO (epoetin β) or placebo by weekly injection for eight weeks. Seven timed urine and blood samples were collected per subject. Urine samples were analyzed by sarcosyl‐PAGE and isoelectric focusing methods in the accredited DoCoLab in Ghent. A selection of samples, including any with false presumptive findings, underwent a second sarcosyl‐PAGE confirmation analysis. Hematological parameters were used to construct a module similar to the ABP and analyzed by two evaluators from an Athlete Passport Management Unit. Sensitivity of the sarcosyl‐PAGE and isoelectric focusing assays for the detection of erythropoietin abuse were 63.8% and 58.6%, respectively, with a false presumptive finding rate of 4.3% and 6%. None of the false presumptive findings tested positive in the confirmation analysis. Sensitivity was highest between 2 and 6 days after dosing, and dropped rapidly outside this window. Sensitivity of the ABP was 91.3%. Specificity of the urine assays was high; however, the detection window of rHuEPO was narrow, leading to questionable sensitivity. The ABP, integrating longitudinal data, is more sensitive, but there are still subjects that evade detection. Combining these methods might improve performance, but will not resolve all observed shortcomings.     

Reference ranges for the urinary steroid profile in a Latin‐American population

The urinary steroid profile has been used in clinical endocrinology for the early detection of enzyme deficiencies. In the field of doping, its evaluation in urine samples is used to diagnose the abuse of substances prohibited in sport. This profile is influenced by sex, age, exercise, diet, and ethnicity, among others; laboratories own reference ranges might compensate for ethnic differences among population and inter‐laboratory biases. This paper shows the reference ranges obtained in the Antidoping Laboratory of Havana for the following steroid profile parameters: ten androgens (testosterone, epitestosterone, androsterone, etiocholanolone, 5α‐androstan‐3α,17β‐diol, 5β‐androstan‐3α,17β‐diol, dehydroepiandrosterone, epiandrosterone, 11β‐hydroxyandrosterone and 11β‐hydroxyetiocholanolone), three estrogens (estradiol, estriol and estrone), two pregnanes (pregnanediol and pregnanetriol) and two corticosteroids (cortisol and tetrahydrocortisol). The urine samples (male: n = 2454 and female: n = 1181) and data obtained are representative of population from Latin‐American countries like Cuba, Venezuela, Mexico, Dominican Republic, Guatemala and Chile. Urine samples were prepared by solid‐phase extraction followed by enzymatic hydrolysis and liquid‐liquid extraction with an organic solvent in basic conditions. Trimethylsilyl derivatives were analyzed by gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry. Reference ranges were established for each sex, allowing the determination of abnormal profiles as a first diagnostic tool for the detection of the abuse of androgenic anabolic steroids. The comparison with the Caucasian population confirms that the urinary steroid profile is influenced by ethnicity. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Disposition of serum steroids in response to combined oral contraceptives and menstrual cycle phases: A double-blind,randomized, placebo-controlled study

To analyze doping control samples from female athletes demands understanding of non-doping factors that affect the steroid profile. These could be physiological factors such as exercise, alcohol consumption, hormonal changes during the menstrual cycle, or the effect of commonly used approved drugs like combined oral contraceptives. Urine samples have been the main way of doping testing, but serum samples are proposed as a complement. Testosterone, dihydrotestosterone, or the ratio of testosterone and androstenedione has been proposed as a biomarker for testosterone doping because it increases after transdermal testosterone administration. In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of 340 healthy females, we analyzed the serum steroid levels, including glucuronide metabolites, before and after 3 months of combined oral contraceptives or placebo. At follow up, sample collection in the placebo group was randomly distributed between different menstrual cycle phases. This enabled to analyze changes in concentrations between the follicular, ovulation, and luteal phases. Combined oral contraceptives decreased all serum steroids including the glucuronide metabolites. As expected, serum testosterone levels increased during the ovulation phase, and also androstenedione and androstenediol, whereas the glucuronide metabolites remained unaffected. Neither combined oral contraceptives nor menstrual cycle phases did affect the ratio of testosterone and androstenedione in serum, and consequently this ratio seems promising as a marker of doping with endogenous anabolic androgenic steroids in women.     

UDP‐glucuronosyltransferase 2B17 genotyping in Japanese athletes and evaluation of the current sports drug testing for detecting testosterone misuse

Ethnicity has been found to influence urinary testosterone glucuronide to epitestosterone glucuronide (T/E) ratios among athletes. Uridine diphospho‐glucuronosyltransferase 2B17 (UGT2B17) is the most active enzyme in testosterone glucuronidation. UGT2B17 polymorphism analysis is rarely performed in Japanese athletes, and the influence of testosterone administration on steroid profiles and carbon isotope ratios, according to gene polymorphisms, in Asians remains unknown. The prevalence of UGT2B17 genotypes and urinary androgenic steroid profiles, classified according to UGT2B17 genotypes, was investigated in Japanese athletes (255 male and 256 female). Testosterone enanthate (100 mg) was administered intramuscularly to Japanese female volunteers (del/del: n = 6, del/ins: n = 3, ins/ins: n = 1). The distribution rates of the UGT2B17 del/del genotype in Japanese male and female athletes were 74.5% and 60.2%, respectively. The ins/ins genotype was detected in only three male (1.2%) and seven female (2.7%) athletes. The prevalence of the UGT2B17 deletion genotype was extremely high in Japanese athletes. The T/E ratio in the del/del group was significantly lower than that in the other groups. After testosterone was administered to female volunteers, the T/E ratios for the del/del individuals failed to reach the positivity criterion of 4. By contrast, in all of the del/del subjects, the gas chromatography/combustion/isotope ratio mass spectrometry (GC‐C‐IRMS) analysis successfully fulfilled the positivity criterion. The overall result has demonstrated the limited effectiveness of population‐based T/E ratios in screening tests for testosterone use. Subject‐based steroid profiling with UGT2B17 genotyping will be an effective strategy for detecting testosterone misuse. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Worldwide distribution of blood values in elite track and field athletes: Biomarkers of altered erythropoiesis

For the first time, blood samples were collected in all athletes participating in a major sporting event of the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) (Athletics World Championships 2011, Daegu, Korea). All variables obtained from blood analyses were incorporated into the individual blood profiles of each athlete for the so‐called athlete biological passport (ABP). This unprecedented data collection highlighted differences for a few blood biomarkers commonly measured and reported for the ABP on some group of athletes. Subsequently, blood tests analyses for all athletes were repeated during the following World Championships (2013, Moscow, Russia). Both sets of blood tests were then used to set up the distribution of blood values for track and field athletes considering potential confounding factors such as gender, age, discipline, origin of the athlete (continental classification), and time of blood collection. Implementation of well‐defined distribution of blood values will allow to improve the estimation of blood doping prevalence among a specific population of athletes in track and field.