A phase I-II study of paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and vinorelbine with filgrastim (rhG-CSF) support in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE: We designed a phase I-II trial of three active agents, paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and vinorelbine, in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to: 1) define the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of paclitaxel with filgrastim (G-CSF) support; and 2) determine the overall response rate and median survival of patients treated on this regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We treated cohorts of patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC with ifosfamide 1.2-1.6 g/m2/day x 3 and vinorelbine 20-25 mg/m2/day x 3 and escalating doses of paclitaxel at 100-175 mg/m2 on day 2 with G-CSF support on a 21-day cycle. One prior experimental single-agent chemotherapy regimen was allowed. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients, were enrolled on this trial: 27 on the phase I portion of the study and an additional 29 at the recommended phase II dose (RPTD). Thirteen patients had received prior chemotherapy. Paclitaxel doses of 175 mg/m2 and 150 mg/m2 produced dose-limiting myelosuppression, and the RPTD was determined to be paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 with ifosfamide 1.2 g/m2/day on days 1-3 and vinorelbine 20 mg/m2/ day on days 1-3 with G-CSF support. The overall response rate was 18%, with a median survival of 6.1 months. Six of 35 patients (17%) treated at the RPTD achieved a partial response to therapy. Grade IV neutropenia was observed in 19 of 35 patients at this dose, with eight patients suffering febrile neutropenia. CONCLUSIONS: This non-cisplatin-containing three-drug regimen has substantial toxicity and low activity in advanced NSCLC, and does not seem to improve on prior regimens. It is unclear whether the lack of efficacy relates to an antagonistic reaction between the specific drugs, administration schedule, or to subtherapeutic doses of the individual agents.     

Paclitaxel in combination chemotherapy with radiotherapy in patients with unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE: The addition of combination chemotherapy to standard radiation therapy has improved treatment for locally unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer. In this phase II study, we evaluated the toxicity and efficacy of a novel chemotherapy regimen that included paclitaxel, cisplatin, and etoposide plus concurrent radiation therapy in this group of patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-three patients with previously untreated, unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (stage IIIA, 11 patients; stage IIIB, 22 patients) initially received two courses of chemotherapy, which included paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 by 1-hour infusion on day 1, cisplatin 60 mg/m/ intravenously (i.v.) on day 2, and etoposide 100 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1, 2 and 3. On week 6, radiation therapy (60 Gy in 30 fractions) was initiated in conjunction with two additional courses of chemotherapy: paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 i.v. by 1-hour infusion on day 1, cisplatin 5 mg/m2 i.v. on days 2- to 10, and etoposide 25 mg/m2 on days 1 to 10. RESULTS: This combined modality program was feasible and well tolerated by most patients. During the two courses of induction chemotherapy, grade 3 or 4 myelosuppression occurred in only six patients (18%). Esophagitis was common during combined modality therapy (grade 3, 10 patients; grade 4 five patients). Forty-two percent of patients had partial response after two courses of induction therapy, and 82% of patients had an objective response at completion of therapy. Twelve patients (36%) had a complete response. Nineteen patients remain progression-free at a median of 8 months; the median survival time has not been reached. CONCLUSION: This paclitaxel-containing combined modality therapy is feasible and highly active in patients with inoperable stage III lung cancer. Esophagitis is the most common severe toxicity with this program. Further studies with paclitaxel-containing combination regimens in patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer are indicated.     

Southwest Oncology Group phase II trial of concurrent carboplatin, etoposide, and radiation for poor-risk stage III non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE: A phase II study was conducted by the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) to assess the efficacy and toxicity of concurrent carboplatin, etoposide, and thoracic radiation (XRT) in a defined population of poor-risk patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with stage III NSCLC were eligible if they were excluded from cisplatin-based protocols because of poor pulmonary or renal function, history of congestive heart failure, hearing loss, peripheral neuropathy, or weight loss. Carboplatin 200 mg/m2 daily intravenously days 1, 3, 29, and 31 and etoposide 50 mg/m2 daily intravenously days 1 through 4 and 29 through 32 were administered. Beginning day 1, XRT was delivered at 1.8 to 2.0 Gy daily to a total dose of 61 Gy. RESULTS: Within a period of 1 year, 63 patients were registered and 60 were eligible. Patient characteristics were age 47 to 79 years, performance status 0 to 1 (82%) and 2 (18%), and stages IIIA (60%) and IIIB (40%) NSCLC. The most common grades 3 and 4 toxicities included leukopenia (50%), thrombocytopenia (23%), and esophagitis (15%). There were no treatment-related deaths. The overall confirmed response rate was 29%, and median overall survival was 13 months (95% confidence interval, 11 to 14 months). The 2-year survival rate was 21%. CONCLUSION: This chemoradiotherapy regimen is well tolerated in poor-risk patients and yields a median survival similar to that of good-risk patients who received cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy. This chemoradiotherapy regimen will be compared with XRT alone in poor-risk patients with stage III NSCLC in a randomized phase III trial.     

Hyperfractionated radiotherapy combined with simultaneous chemotherapy in inoperable non-small cell lung cancer: a pilot study

Between March 1992 and February 1993, hyperfractionated radiotherapy (HRT) (1.2 Gy.fraction-1, twice a day, total dosage of 69.6 Gy) and simultaneous cisplatin (70 mg.m-2, 3rd and 23rd days of HRT) and etoposide (70 mg.m-2, 1-3rd and 20-23rd days of HRT) were applied to 27 patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Their Karnofsky performance statuses were 70-90%, and mean age was 52 (36-63). Two cases were stage II (one of the patients refused the operation and the other was medically inoperable because of insufficient ventilation), eight were stage IIIA and 17 were stage IIIB. No severe life-threatening grade IV acute toxicity findings were observed. Generally, acute side-effects were transient and did not require discontinuation of treatment. Tumour responses were as follows: complete response in six cases (23%); partial response in 19 cases (70%); and stable disease in two (7%). When complete response rates were compared according to stage, histological type, age group and weight loss, no statistically significant difference was found. Median overall and disease-free survival times were 14 months (95% confidence interval) (95% CI) 11-17 months and 10 months (95% CI 7-13 months), respectively. Twelve and 24 months overall and disease-free survival rates were 56 and 30%, and 36 and 24% respectively. No statistically significant difference was found in overall survival rates among epidermoid and nonepidermoid types, while the difference in disease-free survival was statistically significant. The acute and late complications of our HRT and simultaneous chemotherapy protocol were tolerable and the survival rates were encouraging.     

Continuous infusional topotecan in advanced breast and non-small-cell lung cancer: no evidence of increased efficacy

Two open, phase II studies were performed to evaluate the activity and toxicity of infusional topotecan in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) and advanced breast cancer who had not received previous chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Twenty-five patients with an ECOG performance score < 2 were treated with infusional topotecan administered as a daily, continuous intravenous infusion starting at 0.6 mg m(-2) day(-1) (NSCLC) and 0.5 mg m(-2) day(-1) (breast cancer) for 21 days every 4 weeks. Three patients achieved a partial response as defined by WHO criteria: one with NSCLC (8%; 95% CI 0-39%) and two with advanced breast cancer (15%; 95% CI 2-45%). The major toxicities were neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, with one episode of neutropenic sepsis. These data suggest that topotecan delivered as a continuous intravenous infusion over 21 days as single-agent therapy does not appear to offer a clinical advantage over conventional 5-day schedules against advanced NSCLC and advanced breast cancer.     

A phase 2 trial of ifosfamide/mesna as salvage therapy in patients with ovarian cancer refractory to or relapsing after prior platinum-containing chemotherapy

Continuous 24-hr infusion of ifosfamide (IFX) with mesna was studied in 19 patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer refractory to or recurrent after platinum-containing chemotherapy. The patients received IFX 5 g/m2 as a 24-hr i.v. infusion. Mesna (total dose 8 g/m2) was given i.v. 3 hr before, together with, and 0 and 6 hr after IFX infusion, respectively. Cytotoxic therapy was repeated every 4 weeks. Of 19 evaluable patients, none achieved a complete response, 2 showed a partial response, and 8 had stable disease. Median survival for all patients was 6 months, and median time to progression was 4 months. Toxicity was moderate. Leucopenia WHO grade III-IV was observed in 3 patients. Thrombocytopenia WHO grade III-IV was not observed. Nausea/vomiting WHO grade III-IV occurred in 8 patients. One patient experienced mild reversible confusion. No patients had macro-or microscopic hematuria and there was no deterioration of renal function. We conclude that IFX given as a 24-hr infusion is moderately well tolerated, but has only limited activity in patients with ovarian cancer refractory to or relapsing after prior platinum-containing chemotherapy.     

An early phase II trial combining cisplatin and carboplatin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

We conducted an early phase II trial in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to evaluate response efficacy of a combination of Cisplatin (CDDP) and Carboplatin (CBDCA). The twenty-six patients in the study had had no previous treatment. They received a sequential administration of 300 mg/m2 CBDCA and 80 mg/m2 CDDP with approximately 3,500 ml of hydration on day 1 every 4 weeks. All patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. Ten (38.5%) of all assessable patients achieved a partial response (95% confidence interval, 19.8-57.2%). Response rates for patients with stage III A, III B and IV- disease were 40.0 (2/5), 70.0 (7/10) and 9.1% (1/11), respectively. Response rates for patients with squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma and large cell carcinoma were 35.7 (5/14), 45.5 (5/11) and 0.0% (0/1), respectively. The median survival time (MST) of all patients was 11 months. The MST for patients with stage III disease was 14 months; for those with stage IV disease it was 7 months. The MST for responding patients was 15 months and for not responding patients 5 months. Major toxicities were hematologic and gastrointestinal, and the dose-limiting factor was thrombocytopenia. This combination chemotherapy was effective against NSCLC with tolerable toxicities. Further trials are warranted to determine the efficacy of the combination chemotherapy.     

One-hour paclitaxel plus carboplatin in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: results of a multicentre, phase II trial

The aim of this phase II study was to determine the activity and toxicity of paclitaxel (administered by 1-h infusion) and carboplatin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer when used in a multicentre, community-based treatment setting. 100 chemotherapy-naive patients with stage IIIB or IV non-small cell lung cancer were treated between March 1995 and February 1996. All patients had Karnofsky performance status 70-100, measurable disease and adequate bone marrow, kidney and liver function. All patients received intravenous (i.v.) paclitaxel 225 mg/m2 by 1-h infusion followed immediately by carboplatin at a targeted area under the concentration time curve (AUC) of 6.0 using the Calvert formula. Courses were repeated every 21 days. Colony stimulating factors were not used routinely. 38 of 94 evaluable patients (40%) had objective responses to treatment (3 complete responses, 35 partial responses). An additional 32 patients had stable disease at initial re-evaluation. Weight gain during treatment was experienced by 47% of patients with objective response or stable disease. The median survival in this group of 100 patients was 8 months, with an actuarial 1-year survival of 42%. Leucopenia was common, but hospitalisation for treatment of neutropenia and fever occurred in only 3% of courses. Cumulative peripheral neuropathy was common, but usually appeared after the third or fourth course and was severe (grade 3) in only 15% of patients. Other grade 3 and 4 toxicity was uncommon. There was one treatment-related death due to sepsis. This large multicentre community-based phase II trial demonstrated the efficacy of paclitaxel and carboplatin combination chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. When paclitaxel is given by 1-h infusion, this regimen is easily administered in the outpatient setting.     

Vinorelbine as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced cervical carcinoma

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of vinorelbine (VNB) as single-agent neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced cervical carcinoma (ACC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between December 1993 and October 1995, 43 untreated patients with stages IIB to IVA squamous cell cervical cancer were entered onto this study. Forty-two patients are assessable for response and 43 for toxicity. The median age was 46 years (range, 28 to 65). Distribution by stages (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics [FIGO]) was as follows: IIB, 18 patients; IIIA, one; IIIB, 19; and IVA, five. Therapy consisted of VNB 30 mg/m2 by 20-minute intravenous (IV) infusion repeated weekly for 12 injections and followed by radical surgery if feasible or definitive radiotherapy. Both staging and response assessment were performed by a multidisciplinary team. RESULTS: One patient was considered not assessable for response. A total of 493 cycles of therapy were administered and objective remissions were observed in 19 of 42 patients (45%; 95% confidence interval, 30% to 60%). Two patients (5%) had a complete response (CR) and 17 (40%) a partial response (PR); no change (NC) was observed in 16 (38%) and progressive disease (PD) in seven (17%). Six of 19 patients (32%) who achieved objective responses (ORs) underwent surgery. The median time to failure and median survival time have not been reached yet. There were no therapy-related deaths. The dose-limiting toxicity was myelosuppression. Leukopenia occurred in 35 patients (81%) and was grade 3 or 4 in seven (17%). Twelve patients (28%) developed peripheral neuropathy, while myalgias occurred in 10 (23%). Constipation was observed in nine patients (21%), one with a prolonged ileum. Phlebitis was recorded in 18 patients (41%). In contrast, emesis and mucositis were rarely observed. No patient developed alopecia grade 3. By the end of the twelfth course of treatment, the average received dose-intensity was 85.4% of that projected. CONCLUSION: VNB is an active drug against ACC with moderate toxicity. Its activity is among the highest reported for single agents. Further evaluation in association with other agents is clearly justified.     

Treatment of advanced colorectal cancer with folinic acid and 5-fluorouracil in combination with cisplatinum

51 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (stage Dukes D) were treated with intravenous (i.v.) infusion on days 1, 3, 5, 8 and 16 with folinic acid (200 mg/m2) and 5-fluorouracil (600 mg/m2), and on days 1, 8 and 16 with cisplatinum (25 mg/m2 i.v.); cycles were repeated every 4 weeks. All 51 patients were evaluable for toxicity and response criteria. 26 patients had objective responses (3 complete responses, 5.9%; 23 partial responses, 45.1%), relative risk 51% (95% confidence intervals 36.7-65.0%). Response duration ranged from 4 to 28.0 months (median 16.8). Overall median survival of all patients included was 14.7 months (range 3.0-33.0). Toxicity of WHO grade III, requiring dose reduction, occurred in 9 (18%) patients. The regimen described here appears to be active, safe and well tolerated for treatment of patients with advanced colorectal cancer.     

First-line treatment of advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma with docetaxel and vinorelbine

BACKGROUND: Docetaxel and vinorelbine are active agents in the treatment of nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). The efficacy and toxicity of this combination was evaluated in a Phase II study in patients with advanced NSCLC. METHODS: Forty-six chemotherapy-naive patients (44 men and 2 women with a median age of 64 years) with NSCLC (11 with Stage IIIB and 35 with Stage IV disease) were entered into the study; the World Health Organization (WHO) performance status was 0, 1, and 2 in 32, 11, and 3 patients, respectively. Patients received vinorelbine (25 mg/m2) on Day 1 and docetaxel (100 mg/m2) on Day 2 in cycles repeated every 3 weeks. Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor was given to all patients from Day 3 to Day 10. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-seven courses of chemotherapy were administered. Adverse events included WHO Grade 4 neutropenia (15 patients), Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (3 patients), Grade 3 anemia (2 patients), Grade 2 and 3 neurotoxicity (7 patients and 1 patient, respectively), and Grade 3 fatigue (2 patients). Twenty patients (43%) required hospitalization: 11 (24%) for neutropenic fever (2 deaths from sepsis), and 9 (20%) for nonneutropenic pulmonary infections (2 deaths from cardiopulmonary insufficiency). The median overall survival was 5 months and the 1-year survival was 24%. Four complete responses (9.8%) and 11 partial responses (26.8%) (overall response rate of 36.6%; 95% confidence interval, 21.8-51.3%) were documented in 41 evaluable patients (intent-to-treat: 32.6%). Stable and progressive disease occurred in 13 patients each (31.7%). The median duration of response was 5 months and the median time to progression was 3 months (6 months for the responders). CONCLUSIONS: This schedule of docetaxel and vinorelbine combination is effective but its relatively high incidence of complicated neutropenia precludes its general use in patients with advanced NSCLC.     

Phase II study of liarozole in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

The aim of this phase II study was to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of liarozole, a novel benzimidazole derivative, in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Liarozole 300 mg twice daily orally was evaluated in 14 patients with stage IIIB and IV NSCLC. 8 patients had received prior treatment with chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. WHO toxicity grading and response criteria were used. Liarozole was well tolerated. Grade 2 toxicities included alopecia (1 patient), dermatological toxicity (5 patients), dry mouth (2 patients) and nausea and vomiting (2 patients). Leukocytosis was seen in 5 patients, including 2 cases with an elevated white cell count pretreatment. Liarozole was discontinued in 1 patient who developed intolerable progressive pruritus associated with an erythematous rash. No objective tumour response was seen, all 14 patients developing progressive disease within 4 months of commencing treatment. Liarozole was well tolerated but was ineffective as single agent therapy in the management of NSCLC. The side-effect profile was compatible with inhibition of retinoic acid degradation.     

Cisplatin-vindesine-mitomycin (MVP) vs cisplatin-ifosfamide-vinorelbine (PIN) vs carboplatin-vinorelbine (CaN) in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a FONICAP randomized phase II study. Italian Lung Cancer Task Force (FONICAP)

In the present multicentre randomized phase II trial, the activity and toxicity of three platinum-based combination regimens for the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were evaluated. The three regimens were: MVP (mitomycin-C 6 mg m(-2) on day 1, vindesine 3 mg m(-2) on days 1 and 15, and cisplatin 80 mg m(-2) on day 1 every 28 days), PIN (cisplatin 80 mg m(-2) day 1, ifosfamide 3 g m(-2) day 1 and vinorelbine 25 mg m(-2) day 1 and 8 every 21 days) and CaN (carboplatin 350 mg m(-2) day 1 and vinorelbine 25 mg m(-2) days 1 and 8 every 28 days). A total of 140 chemotherapy-naive patients entered the study; 49 patients were treated with MVP, 48 with PIN and 43 with CaN. Sixty-seven per cent of the patients had stage IV disease. Response rates, calculated on an 'intention to treat' basis, were as follows: MVP, 14.3% (95% CI 5.94-27.2%); PIN, 16.7% (95% CI 7.4-30.2%); and CaN, 14% (95% CI 5.3-27.9%). The overall median survivals were 256, 269 and 243 days for patients treated with MVP, PIN and CaN respectively. Myelosuppression was the most frequent toxicity: grade 3-4 leucopenia was observed in 14.3%, 25% and 18.6% of patients treated with MVP, PIN and CaN respectively. This multicentre phase II randomized trial shows that MVP, PIN and CaN can be administered on an outpatient basis with acceptable toxicities. Unfortunately, the three regimens showed an activity significantly lower than that reported in previous single-institution phase II trials.     

Imprinted expression of the murine Angelman syndrome gene, Ube3a, in hippocampal and Purkinje neurons

BACKGROUND: Edatrexate and carboplatin are each active single agents in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Preclinical studies in NSCLC lines have demonstrated schedule-dependent synergy of edatrexate followed by carboplatin. In a phase I trial, we demonstrated the tolerability of this combination, the ability of ice-chip cryotherapy to ameliorate dose-limiting mucositis, and promising activity in NSCLC. This phase II trial (SWOG 9207) was undertaken to investigate the efficacy of this regimen in stage IV NSCLC. METHODS: A total of 24 patients with stage IV disease were accrued to this Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) multicenter study. Treatment consisted of edatrexate 80 mg/m2 (50% dose on day 8) intravenously weekly for 5 weeks, then every other week, and carboplatin 350 mg/m2 every 28 days. RESULTS: Of the 24 patients, 23 were assessable for toxicity and response; one was ineligible for study entry. Myelosuppression was the most significant toxicity; grade 3-4 neutropenia was seen in 8/23 patients. Two patients died of neutropenic sepsis during the first cycle of therapy, in both instances associated with the presence of pleural effusions. Although mild mucositis was common, it was dose-limiting (grade 3) in only three patients. Objective response was observed in 3/23 patients (13%). The median survival time was 7 months, and 30% of patients remained alive at one year. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that ice-chip cryotherapy is effective in reducing the severity of mucositis typically associated with this edatrexate schedule of administration. However, unexpectedly severe myelosuppression resulted in death from neutropenic sepsis in two patients with third space fluid collections, leading to a protocol amendment to exclude such patients from study entry. Furthermore, response and median survival with this dose schedule of edatrexate and carboplatin do not appear to be improved compared to other chemotherapeutic regimens tested by SWOG in this patient population.     

Paclitaxel by 96-hour continuous infusion in combination with cisplatin: a phase I trial in patients with advanced lung cancer

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of paclitaxel administered by 96-hour continuous infusion in combination with cisplatin, to determine if the addition of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) permits significant paclitaxel dose escalation, and to assess the toxicity and preliminary activity of this combination in patients with advanced lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty patients with untreated lung cancer were enrolled: 42 had advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and eight had extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Patients received paclitaxel doses of 100 to 180 mg/m2/96 hours and cisplatin doses of 60 to 80 mg/m2 as a single 30-minute bolus injection at the end of the paclitaxel infusion. RESULTS: Two of six patients experienced dose-limiting neutropenia at a dose of paclitaxel 140 mg/m2/96 hours and cisplatin 80 mg/m2. With G-CSF support, one of three patients experienced both dose-limiting mucositis and fatal neutropenic sepsis at a dose of paclitaxel 180 mg/m2/96 hours and cisplatin 80 mg/m2. Significant peripheral neuropathy developed in five patients and occurred after six or more cycles of therapy. Thirty-three of 42 patients with NSCLC had measurable disease; the objective response rate was 55%, with two complete responses and 16 partial responses. For all 42 patients with NSCLC, the median time to progression and median survival duration were 5 months and 10 months, respectively. The actuarial 1-year survival rate was 41%. Of eight SCLC patients, four responded to therapy, and the median survival duration for all SCLC patients was 11 months. CONCLUSION: The MTD without G-CSF is paclitaxel 120 mg/m2/96 hours and cisplatin 80 mg/m2, and the MTD with G-CSF is paclitaxel 160 mg/m2/96 hours and cisplatin 80 mg/m2. Infusional paclitaxel with cisplatin is well tolerated and active in patients with advanced NSCLC.     

Hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction is impaired in rats with nitrofen-induced congenital diaphragmatic hernia

The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy and toxicity of topotecan administered as a 21-day continuous intravenous infusion in patients with advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. 26 previously untreated patients with advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma received topotecan at a dose of 0.5 mg/m2/day or 0.6 mg/m2/day as a continuous intravenous infusion for 21 days. Courses were repeated every 28 days. 26 patients were assessable for response and toxicity on an intent-to-treat basis. The initial 8 patients at a starting dose of 0.6 mg/m2/day experienced unacceptable myelosuppression and dose delays. The subsequent 18 patients, therefore began therapy at a dose of 0.5 mg/m2/day. The major toxicity of topotecan at this dose and schedule was myelosuppression, which was reversible and non-cumulative. There were no complete responses and two partial responses for a total response rate of 8% (95% confidence interval, 1-25%). Response durations were 17 and 45 weeks. Stable disease was seen in 3 patients. The median time to progression for all patients was 8 weeks and the median survival was 20 weeks. Topotecan given as a 21-day continuous intravenous infusion has a similar response rate and median survival to our previously reported study of the 5-day short infusion regimen in pancreatic carcinoma.     

Phase II trial of hyperfractionated accelerated radiation therapy for nonresectable non-small-cell lung cancer: results of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 4593

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility, toxicity, and efficacy of hyperfractionated accelerated radiation therapy (HART) for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty patients from six institutions with stage IIIA or IIIB NSCLC were enrolled between November 1993 and August 1995. Radiation therapy (total dose, 57.6 Gy in 36 fractions) was delivered over 15 days with the use of three daily fractions with a 4-hour interval between fractions and an 8-hour interval between on-cord fields. Patients were not treated on weekends. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients (93%) completed radiation therapy. Treatment-related toxicities of grade 3 or greater included esophagitis in six patients and grade 3 skin reaction in three patients. The overall objective response rate was 54%, and the response rate within the radiation field was 64%. With a minimum follow-up of 19 months in surviving patients, the median survival and 1-year survival rate are 13 months and 57%, respectively. The median relapse-free survival and 1-year relapse-free survival rate are 7 months and 23%, respectively. No transverse myelitis or late toxicities of grade 4 or greater have been observed. CONCLUSION: HART, delivered to a total dose of 57.6 Gy over 15 total days, is practical and well tolerated. Survival appears similar to that seen with modern combined modality regimens. A phase III trial is under way.     

Insulin-induced lipohypertrophy treated by liposuction

BACKGROUND: The new intercalative agent Mitonafide was shown in early clinical trials to be toxic to the central nervous system when administered as a short intravenous infusion, but not when given as a 120-hour continuous infusion. Thus, clinical development in different tumor types was pursued using only this administration schedule. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-nine patients with previously untreated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and at least one measurable site received Mitonafide as a 120-hour continuous (5 days) infusion every 3 weeks. The starting dose was 170 mg/m2/day x 5 in the first 26 patients and 200 mg/m2/day x 5 in the remainder. Patients were evaluated for toxicity after each course and for response every two courses and remained on treatment until excessive toxicity or disease progression were observed. A special test, the "Mini-mental state", was used to assess patients' cognitive functions. RESULTS: Of the 49 patients entered, 42 were evaluable for response and toxicity. Toxicity consisted mainly of myelosuppression and no neurologic side effects were observed. Only one patient presented a partial response. CONCLUSIONS: Although definitively safe with this schedule of administration, Mitonafide is not active in NSCLC.     

Phase II trial of paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin in patients with recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

PURPOSE: To assess the activity and toxicity profile of combined taxol (paclitaxel), ifosfamide, and platinum (cisplatin) (TIP) in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the head and neck. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Recurrent or metastatic head and neck SCC patients received paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 in a 3-hour infusion on day 1; ifosfamide 1,000 mg/m2 in a 2-hour infusion on days 1 through 3; mesna 600 mg/m2 on days 1 through 3; and cisplatin 60 mg/m2 on day 1, repeated every 3 to 4 weeks. All were premedicated with dexamethasone, diphenhydramine, and cimetidine. Prophylactic hematopoietic growth factors were not permitted. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients were assessable for response and toxicity; 53 for survival (local-regional recurrence alone in 57% and distant metastasis with or without local-regional recurrence in 43%). Overall response rate was 58% (30 of 52) of patients; complete response rate was 17% (nine of 52) of patients, with six complete responses that continued for a median 15.7+ months. Median follow-up of all patients was 17.7 months. Median survival was 8.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 8.1 to 17.5 months). Toxicity was relatively well tolerated and caused no deaths. The most frequent moderate-to-severe toxicity (90% of patients) was transient grades 3 to 4 neutropenia; neutropenic fever occurred in 27%. Grade 3 peripheral neuropathy occurred in three patients, none had grade 4. Grade 3 mucositis occurred in only one patient, none had grade 4. CONCLUSION: TIP had major activity in this setting, with a 58% objective response rate, 17% complete response rate, durable complete responses (six of nine persisting), and relatively well-tolerated toxicity, with no toxic deaths. The activity of TIP, a novel taxol-cisplatin-based regimen, in recurrent or metastatic head and neck SCC should be confirmed in a phase III trial.     

Acute myocardial infarction in a patient during dobutamine stress echocardiography

Combined chemotherapy/radiotherapy treatments appear to yield better results in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) than radiotherapy alone. The optimal induction chemotherapy regimen remains to be established. In the present study, chemotherapy with cisplatin and vinorelbine was used prior to radical radiotherapy in Stage III-B NSCLC. Thirty-three patients were entered prospectively into a Phase II study. Treatment consisted of three cycles of chemotherapy with cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 1 and vinorelbine 30 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, followed by thoracic radiotherapy (60 Gy). Twenty-two percent of the 33 patients had grade 3-4 leukopenia, and there were six episodes (in 4 patients) of neutropenia-associated fever. Gastrointestinal toxicity was generally moderate. Peripheral neuropathy was present in 42% of the patients, although in most of them it was slight. The main radiotherapy toxicity was esophagitis grade I-II. Evaluation of response after the third chemotherapy course showed an objective response in 16 patients (48%), whereas in three patients (9%) the disease progressed during therapy. The median survival of the entire group was 13 months. Cisplatin plus vinorelbine followed by radiotherapy is an effective schedule for patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.