Influence of anesthetic technique in postoperative analgesia in thoracic surgery

OBJECTIVE: To compare the intensity of postoperative pain after thoracotomy with 2 anesthetic techniques: 1) thoracic epidural block with bupivacaine administered before surgery (combined anesthesia with isoflurane) and 2) conventional balanced anesthesia with isoflurane and endovenous fentanyl. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty patients scheduled for thoracotomy by lateral incision (T5-T6) were randomly divided into 2 groups of 15. Group A received 8 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine with adrenalin 1:200.000 30 min before start of surgery while group B received 8 ml saline solution through an epidural catheter inserted to T4-T8. Combined anesthesia (4 ml 0.5% bupivacaine through an epidural catheter 150 min after the first dose and isoflurane in 100% oxygen) was used in group A. Group B received balanced anesthesia with endovenous fentanyl 2.5 micrograms/kg and isoflurane in 100% oxygen. The difference in pain intensity during postoperative recovery was assessed by way of the following variables: number of boluses administered by epidural patient-controlled analgesia (bupivacaine 0.0625% and fentanyl 6 micrograms/ml); score on a visual analog scale of 10 at baseline and at 1, 3, 7, 11, 19 and 43 hours after surgery; and need for additional analgesia (diclofenac) during the 43 hours of study. Arterial gases were measured during the preoperative period and at 1, 3, 7, 19 and 43 hours after surgery. RESULTS: No significant differences in pain intensity measured on the visual analog scale, by the number of boluses per patients or by need for additional analgesia were found between the 2 groups. The total number of boluses administered and additional analgesic requirements were greater in the group receiving bupivacaine, although the difference was not significant (p = 0.095 and p = 0.056, respectively). Nor were there significant differences in pH and PaCO2 levels for the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Analgesic efficacy after thoracotomy was similar for our 2 groups receiving either combined anesthesia (epidural bupivacaine at 0.5% and isoflurane) or balanced anesthesia with isoflurane and endovenous fentanyl.     

Caudal clonidine and bupivacaine for combined epidural and general anaesthesia in children

BACKGROUND: Clonidine produces analgesia by actions on alpha 2-adrenoceptors and enhances both sensory and motor blockade from epidural injection of local anaesthetics. Low-dose clonidine has been used so far for caudal injection in children. Our aim was to study the perioperative effects of high-dose caudal clonidine when added to low concentration of bupivacaine for combined epidural and general anaesthesia in children. METHODS: After induction of general anaesthesia caudal block was performed either with 1 ml.kg-1 bupivacaine 0.175% with the addition of clonidine 5 micrograms.kg-1 (n = 20), or with 1 ml.kg-1 bupivacaine 0.175% (n = 20). The intraoperative anaesthetic requirements, the perioperative haemodynamic effects, respiratory rate, sedation score, postoperative pain scores and side effects were assessed by a blinded observer. A patient-controlled analgesia system was used for postoperative pain relief. The quality of postoperative pain relief was assessed using Smiley's pain analogue scale. RESULTS: Intraoperative haemodynamic responses did not differ between the groups. However, during emergence from general anaesthesia children in the clonidine group had significantly lower heart rates and blood pressure compared to children in the control group. In addition, heart rates and blood pressures were also lower in the clonidine group in the early postoperative period (P < 0.05). Postoperative analgesia was significantly better in the clonidine group as evidenced by the total number of requests (3 vs 12, P < 0.05) and the total amount of tramadol (20.5 mg vs 72.8 mg, P < 0.05) administered. The duration of the caudal analgesia was significantly longer in the clonidine group (20.9 +/- 7.4 h vs 14.4 +/- 10.9 h, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that caudal clonidine 5 micrograms.kg-1 enhances and prolongs caudal blockade with bupivacaine (1.175% in children. It also blocks sympathoadrenergic responses during emergence from anaesthesia. Sedation and cardiovascular effects are observed up to 3 h into the postoperative period.     

Dose-response relationship of clonidine with epidural administration of ropivacaine in orthopedic procedures of the lower extremities

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate preliminarydose-range effects of clonidine added to ropivacaine for epidural analgesia in elective orthopedic surgery of the lower limbs with doses, causing a minimum of cardiovascular side effects. METHODS: 60 patients were randomly assigned to receive in a double-blind fashion a mixture of 1 mg/cm height ropivacaine plus saline or 1 mg/cm ropivacaine plus 25 micrograms, 50 micrograms, 75 micrograms, 100 micrograms or 150 micrograms clonidine for epidural analgesia. The sensory and motor function were determined at defined time intervals for 30 minutes. Heart rate and blood pressure were controlled and sedation score was judged. The postoperative 2-segment-regression of pin-prick and the onset of pain were recorded. RESULTS: The six groups were comparable in demographic data and in term of onset time. The prolongation of analgesia reached 513 +/- 92 min (p = 0.002) for 150 micrograms clonidine, 460 +/- 148 min (p = 0.073) for 100 micrograms clonidine, 440 +/- 86 min (p = 0.057) for 75 micrograms clonidine compared with 347 +/- 114 min for saline. In an equal manner, 2-segment-regression for pin-prick was extended to 251 +/- 47 min (p = 0.018) for 150 micrograms clonidine, 238 +/- 33 min (p = 0.034) for 100 micrograms clonidine, 229 +/- 29 min (p = 0.027) for 75 micrograms clonidine and 178 +/- 43 min for saline. Heart rate dropped down in all groups. Mean arterial pressure decreased significantly in the groups with 75, 100 and 150 micrograms clonidine. Sedation score increased continuously from 0.6 +/- 0.5 (saline) to 1.8 +/- 0.8 (150 micrograms clonidine). CONCLUSION: We conclude that 150 micrograms clonidine significantly enhances the duration of analgesia of epidurally administered ropivacaine in a mean of 171 mg. This time interval is longer than the one with 200 mg ropivacaine alone. But, there are side effects in form of decrease of arterial pressure. Cardiovascular monitoring seems to be essential. Because of the enhanced analgesia duration, the time interval for reloading epidural anaesthesia are increased.     

Adrenaline markedly improves thoracic epidural analgesia produced by a low-dose infusion of bupivacaine, fentanyl and adrenaline after major surgery. A randomised, double-blind, cross-over study with and without adrenaline

BACKGROUND: Basic pharmacological research indicates that there are synergistic antinociceptive effects at the spinal cord level between adrenaline, fentanyl and bupivacaine. Our clinical experience with such a mixture in a thoracic epidural infusion after major surgery confirms this. The objectives of the present study were to evaluate the effects on postoperative pain intensity, pain relief and side effects when removing adrenaline from this triple epidural mixture. METHODS: A prospective, randomised, double-blind, cross-over study was carried out in 24 patients after major thoracic or abdominal surgery. Patients with only mild pain when coughing during a titrated thoracic epidural infusion of about 10 ml.h-1 of bupivacaine 1 mg.ml-1, fentanyl 2 micrograms.ml-1, and adrenaline 2 micrograms.ml-1 were included. On the 1st and 2nd postoperative days each patient was given a double-blind epidural infusion, at the same rate, with or without adrenaline. The effect was observed for 4 h or until pain when coughing became unacceptable in spite of a rescue analgesic procedure. Rescue analgesia consisted of up to two epidural bolus injections per hour and i.v. morphine if necessary. All patients received rectal paracetamol 1 g, every 8 h. Fentanyl serum concentrations were measured with a radioimmunoassay technique at the start and end of each study period. Main outcome measures were extent of sensory blockade and pain intensity at rest and when coughing, evaluated by a visual analogue scale, a verbal categorical rating scale, the Prince Henry Hospital pain score, and an overall quality of pain relief score. RESULTS: The number of hypaesthetic dermatomal segments decreased (P < 0.001) and pain intensity at rest and when coughing increased (P < 0.001) when adrenaline was omitted from the triple epidural mixture. This change started within the first hour after removing adrenaline. After 3 h pain intensity when coughing had increased to unacceptable levels in spite of rescue analgesia (epidural bolus injections and i.v. morphine). Within 15-20 min after restarting the triple epidural mixture with adrenaline, pain intensity was again reduced to mild pain when coughing. Serum concentration of fentanyl doubled from 0.22 to 0.45 ng.ml-1 (P < 0.01), and there was more sedation during the period without adrenaline. CONCLUSIONS: Adrenaline increases sensory block and improves the pain-relieving effect of a mixture of bupivacaine and fentanyl infused epidurally at a thoracic level after major thoracic or abdominal surgery. Serum fentanyl concentrations doubled and sedation increased when adrenaline was removed from the epidural infusion, indicating more rapid vascular absorption and systemic effects of fentanyl.     

Comparative study of postoperative analgesia with methadone and fentanyl in continuous peridural perfusion

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether continuous epidural perfusion of fentanyl, which is more liposoluble than methadone, provides a similar level of analgesia with fewer side effects than methadone administered by the same route for postoperative pain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospective double blind study of 40 patients, randomly assigned to two groups. Group F (n = 20) received 300 micrograms-1200 micrograms/24 h in epidural perfusion. Group M (n = 20) received 9 mg-18 mg/24 h in epidural perfusion. In both cases treatment was for pain in the first 72 h after abdominal surgery. Analgesia quality was evaluated on a visual analog (VAS) scale from 1 to 10 at rest and moving. Need for complementary analgesia was also recorded, as were side effects related to the technique. RESULTS: Quality of analgesia was good and similar which both drugs. Postoperative pain did not surpass 3 on the VAS at rest or 4.5 while moving, although group F patients' need for complementary analgesia was significantly greater (p < 0.05). The incidence of hypoxemia was greater in group M than in group F (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Continuous epidural perfusion of fentanyl provides good analgesia and is associated with less hypoxemia than is methadone.     

Epidural fentanyl, adrenaline and clonidine as adjuvants to local anaesthetics for surgical analgesia: meta-analyses of analgesia and side-effects

BACKGROUND: The risk/benefit ratio of adding fentanyl, adrenaline and clonidine to epidural local anaesthetics for improving intraoperative analgesia is unclear. This meta-analysis was performed to clarify this issue. METHODS: Trials retrieved by search were considered if they were prospective, controlled, epidural analgesia (without combining general anaesthesia) was planned and occurrence of pain during surgery or side-effects were reported. Papers entered meta-analysis if they reached a predefined minimum quality score. Pooled odds ratios (OR) and confidence intervals (CI) were computed. P < 0.05 was considered as significant. RESULTS: Eighteen trials were included in the analysis for fentanyl. Fentanyl decreased the likelihood of pain (OR = 0.21, 95% CI = 0.15-0.30, P < 0.001) and increased the incidence of pruritus (OR = 5.59, 95% CI = 3.12-10.05, P < 0.001) and sedation (OR = 1.88, 95% CI = 1.19-2.98, P = 0.003), compared to control (local anaesthetic without fentanyl). Fentanyl had no effect on respiratory depression, nausea, vomiting and Apgar score. One case of respiratory depression of a newborn was observed. Because of the very low number of trials selected, evaluation of adrenaline and clonidine was not feasible. CONCLUSION: The analysis of current literature shows that the addition of fentanyl to local anaesthetics for intraoperative epidural analgesia is safe and advantageous. The reduction in the incidence of pain during surgery is quantitatively high and therefore clinically significant. Side-effects are mild. Randomized, controlled trials have to be performed in order to clarify the role of adrenaline and clonidine as epidural adjuvants for surgical analgesia.     

Postoperative analgesia after co-administration of clonidine and morphine by the intrathecal route in patients undergoing hip replacement

Postoperative analgesia after intrathecal co-administration of clonidine hydrochloride (75 micrograms) and morphine sulfate (0.5 mg) was compared with analgesia produced after either intrathecal morphine (0.5 mg) or 0.9% sodium chloride in 90 patients undergoing total hip replacement under bupivacaine spinal anesthesia. Patient-controlled morphine requirements were significantly reduced (P < 0.001) postoperation by both clonidine/morphine (median 5 mg/24 h) and morphine (median 7 mg/24 h) compared with control (saline) (median 28 mg/24 h). However, no significant additional reduction in postoperative analgesic requirements was shown with the clonidine/morphine combination compared with morphine alone. Visual analog pain scores, although good in all groups at all times, were significantly poorer in the control group at 2 h (P < 0.04) and 4 h (P < 0.001) after operation compared with both treatment groups, and significantly poorer than the clonidine/morphine group at 6 h (P < 0.002) and 24 h (P < 0.009) postoperation. Mean arterial blood pressure was significantly lower in the clonidine/morphine group than in the two other groups (P < 0.001) between 2 and 5 h after operation. The incidence of emesis was similar in the clonidine/morphine and morphine groups and was significantly more than in the control group.     

The effect of the addition of adrenaline to pethidine for patient-controlled epidural analgesia after caesarean section

We have investigated the addition of adrenaline to pethidine for patient-controlled epidural analgesia after elective Caesarean section. In a randomised, double-blind study, patients received patient-controlled epidural analgesia for 24 h using pethidine 5 mg.ml-1 with adrenaline 5 micrograms.ml-1 (adrenaline group, n = 40) or pethidine 5 mg.ml-1 without adrenaline (plain group, n = 38). Visual analogue scale pain scores at rest and on coughing measured 2 h, 6 h and 24 h after surgery were similar between the two groups. There was a trend towards lower mean total consumption of pethidine in the adrenaline group (231.5 mg; SD 140.5 mg) compared with the plain group (289.5 mg; SD 139.5 mg; p = 0.071). Patients in the adrenaline group had higher visual analogue scale scores for nausea at 2 h and 24 h and higher scores for pruritus at 2 h compared with the plain group. Addition of adrenaline to pethidine for patient-controlled epidural analgesia does not appear to have significant clinical advantages.     

Drug-induced gingival hyperplasia and its management--a literature review

The purpose of our study was to find out whether patient-controlled epidural administration (PCEA) of a mixture containing a low-dose local anaesthetic, opioid and alpha 2-agonist provides as good or better postoperative analgesia as continuous epidural administration of the same analgetic solution. METHODS: 30 patients (ASA I-III), scheduled for major abdominal surgery, were randomly divided into 2 groups. 90 minutes after induction of general anaesthesia all patients received a continuous epidural infusion of 5 ml/h of the analgetic solution (50 micrograms sufentanil + 150 micrograms clonidine in 50 ml 0.125% bupivacaine) until the end of surgery. Immediately postoperatively the patients of group A received a continuous infusion of the study solution (5-8 ml/h), the patients of group B received a baseline continuous epidural infusion (3 ml/h), additionally they could self-administer 5 ml boli via a PCEA device. Measurements included the total dose of infused drug solution, pain at rest and on exercise by a visual analogue scale, cardiorespiratory data and side effects within the first 24 hours postoperatively. A standardised interview on analgesia and side effects was held 2 days after surgery. RESULTS: The PCEA group demanded less epidural analgesics (gr. B: 112 +/- 33 ml vs. gr. A: 135 +/- 20 ml) p < 0.01). Both continuous epidural infusion and patient-controlled administration provided very good analgesia at rest (gr. A: VAS 0.4 +/- 0.4 and gr. B: VAS 0.4 +/- 0.5) (n.s.). On exercise continuous epidural infusion of analgesics resulted in significantly lower pain scores (gr. A: 1.9 +/- 1.1) than patient-controlled application (gr. B: 3.4 +/- 1.1) (p < 0.01). We did not notice severe side effects such as respiratory depression or drop of heart rate or blood pressure. CONCLUSION: In patients at rest both continuous and patient-controlled epidural administration of analgesics provides excellent analgesia after major abdominal surgery. Contrariwise, patients on exercise who could use a PCA-device experienced more pain compared to those with a continuous epidural infusion technique. On the other hand the patients of the PCA-group consumed less epidural analgesics. We did not notice any severe side effects such as respiratory depression or cardiovascular instability during the study.     

Postoperative patient-controlled epidural analgesia with opioid bupivacaine mixtures

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and safety of patient-controlled epidural analgesia of morphine or fentanyl in combination with bupivacaine for postoperative pain relief. METHODS: Forty ASA I-II patients scheduled for major abdominal surgery were studied. After insertion of a lumbar epidural catheter, patients were given a non-opioid general anaesthetic. After surgery patients complaining of pain, received a loading dose of 2 mg morphine (Group I) or 50 micrograms fentanyl (Group II). For continuing pain, 1 mg morphine in 4 ml bupivacaine 0.125% (0.25 mg.ml-1 morphine and 1 mg.ml-1 bupivacaine, Group I) or 20 micrograms fentanyl in 4 ml bupivacaine 0.125% (5 micrograms.ml-1 fentanyl and 1 mg.ml-1 bupivacaine Group II) were administered. Blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate and SpO2 were monitored. Assessments of pain (VAS), nausea-vomiting, motor block, pruritus and sedation were recorded for 24 hr. RESULTS: No difference in pain or sedation was observed between groups. The 24 hr postoperative opioid consumption was 15.50 +/- 7.53 mg morphine and 555.10 +/- 183.85 micrograms fentanyl. Total bupivacaine 0.125% consumption was 58.00 +/- 30.14 ml in Group I and 101.05 +/- 36.77 ml in Group II. One patient in Group II complained of motor weakness in one leg. The incidence of nausea (Group I 45%, Group II 10% P < 0.05) and pruritus (Group I 30%, Group II 5% P < 0.05) was less in patients receiving fentanyl. CONCLUSION: Both methods were effective in the prevention of pain but, because of fewer side effects, fentanyl may be preferable to morphine.     

Thoracic epidural anaesthesia for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Effects on postoperative complications

We have performed a retrospective analysis of the peri-operative course of 218 consecutive patients who underwent routine coronary artery bypass graft surgery in this institution. All patients received a standardised general anaesthetic using target-controlled infusions of alfentanil and propofol. One hundred patients also received thoracic epidural anaesthesia with bupivacaine and clonidine, started before surgery and continued for 5 days after surgery. The remaining 118 patients received target-controlled infusion of alfentanil for analgesia for the first 24 h after surgery, followed by intravenous patient-controlled morphine analgesia for a further 48 h. Using computerised patient medical records, we analysed the frequency of respiratory, neurological, renal, gastrointestinal, haematological and cardiovascular complications in these two groups. New arrhythmias requiring treatment occurred in 18% of the thoracic epidural anaesthesia group of patients compared with 32% of the general anaesthesia group (p = 0.02). There was also a trend towards a reduced incidence of respiratory complications in the thoracic epidural anaesthesia group. The time to tracheal extubation was decreased in the epidural group, with the tracheas of 21% of the patients being extubated immediately after surgery compared with 2% in the general anaesthesia group (p < 0.001). There were no serious neurological problems resulting from the use of thoracic epidural analgesia.     

Parasympathetic neuropathy associated with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND: As extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is frequently carried out on an outpatient basis, it is crucial to choose an adequate analgesic with less adverse effect. This study evaluated the use of three different intravenous agents: fentanyl, tramadol HCl and tenoxicam in ESWL. METHODS: One hundred and twenty patients undergoing lithotripsy were randomly assigned to receive either intravenous fentanyl 1 microgram/kg, tramadol HCl 1.5 mg/kg or tenoxicam 0.3 mg/kg before lithotripsy. Pain intensity was recorded using verbal rating pain scales (VRPS). Cases without adequate analgesia (VRPS > 4) or could not tolerate the pain, additional bolus of fentanyl 25 micrograms were given until adequate analgesia was achieved. Side effects were recorded as well. RESULTS: No significant differences were found among groups in demographic data, VRPS, number of total shock waves, cases with supplementary fentanyl, mean dose of supplementary fentanyl or the incidence of dizziness. However, the incidence of nausea or vomiting was significantly higher in fentanyl and tramadol groups comparing with tenoxicam group (15.0% and 25.0% vs. 0.0%). Oxygen saturation in fentanyl group was also significantly lower than the other two groups (p < 0.01). In addition, VRPS had a significant correlation with voltage intensities (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Lithotripsy can be satisfactorily performed by employing fentanyl, tramadol or tenoxicam for analgesia; tenoxicam apparently offers a better analgesic quality with less side effect. Furthermore, the need for stronger analgesia during larger voltage intensity should be tailored to the needs of the individuals.     

Effects of premedication on dose requirements for propofol: comparison of clonidine and hydroxyzine

The influence of a single dose of clonidine (5 micrograms kg-1) or hydroxyzine (1 mg kg-1) on intraoperative propofol requirements was determined in 28 male patients (ASA I) undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery. Patients were randomly allocated to receive either clonidine or hydroxyzine orally 2 h before induction of anaesthesia. After a loading dose of propofol (2.5 mg kg-1), mivacurium (0.2 mg kg-1) and alfentanil (15 micrograms kg-1), anaesthesia was maintained with a standardized propofol infusion supplemented with nitrous oxide (66%) in oxygen. During surgery, additional propofol boluses (1 mg kg-1) were administered when heart rate or mean arterial pressure increased by more than 10% compared with preinduction values. The clonidine group demonstrated a 14.5% decrease in total propofol requirements (P < 0.05) and a 52.2% reduction in additional propofol boluses (P < 0.02) in comparison with the hydroxyzine group. intraoperative heart rate and mean arterial pressure were significantly lower in the clonidine group but no patients needed treatment with ephedrine for hypotension or bradycardia. Recovery of psychomotor function and discharge from the recovery room were not delayed in the clonidine group. This study indicates that 5 micrograms kg-1 clonidine given as premedication in ASA I patients reduces intraoperative propofol requirements in comparison with 1 mg kg-1 hydroxyzine without inducing adverse effects on recovery or haemodynamic stability.     

Obstetric analgesia using continuous epidural perfusion of bupivacaine, adrenaline, and fentanyl

OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy and complications of continuous epidural perfusion of bupivacaine, adrenaline and fentanyl in the relief of pain during first and second stage labour during vaginal birth. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 1990 and March 1993 we used continuous epidural perfusion for control of pain during labor in 1307 women. The solution administered through an epidural catheter and maintained until expulsion was one 10 ml bolus of bupivacaine 0.25% with adrenaline 1:200,000 and fentanyl 25 micrograms followed by continuous perfusion of bupivacaine 0.0625% with adrenaline 1:200,000 and fentanyl 2 micrograms/ml at an infusion rate of 12 ml/h. When analgesia was insufficient, a bolus of local anesthetic was administered or a pudendal block was carried out. RESULTS: Ninety-two percent of the birthing women reported good analgesic effect during the first stage; for 7% the effect was fair and for 0.55% it was poor. During the second stage 88% reported satisfactory analgesia, and 8% fair or poor. Assessment was not possible for the remaining women, who underwent cesarean sections. Complications were few and easily controllable. CONCLUSIONS: Maintenance of epidural perfusion with 0.0625% bupivacaine with adrenaline 1:200,000 and fentanyl 2 micrograms/ml provides sufficient analgesia during all stages of childbirth.     

Effects of continuous epidural administration of fentanyl and morphine on postcesarean pain

We studied the effects of continuous epidural administration of fentanyl and morphine with bupivacaine for management of postcesarean pain. Eighteen patients received either bolus epidural administration of fentanyl 100 micrograms or morphine 3 mg with 0.5% bupivacaine 4 ml, followed by continuous infusion of fentanyl 33 micrograms.ml-1 with 0.17% bupivacaine or morphine 0.21 mg.ml-1 with 0.17% bupivacaine for 48 hours, respectively. Pain score was assessed at 0 h, 12h, 24h and 48h after leaving the operating room. Pain score increased significantly and progressively in the fentanyl group. In all cases pruritus was noted. Severe pruritus was observed in the morphine group significantly more than in the fentanyl group. The current results indicate that morphine may be preferable to fentanyl for postcesarean pain control using the present opioid doses.     

Thoracic epidural analgesia in aortocoronary bypass surgery. II: Effects on the endocrine metabolic response

Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) may offer haemodynamic benefits for patients with coronary heart disease going through major surgery. This may-in part-be secondary to an effect on the endocrine and metabolic response to surgery. We therefore investigated the effect of TEA on the endocrine metabolic response to aortocoronary bypass surgery (ACBS). Thirty male patients (age < 65 years, ejection fraction > 0.5) were randomized into 3 groups; the HF group receiving a high dose fentanyl (55 micrograms.kg-1) anaesthesia, the HF+TEA group with the same fentanyl dose+TEA with 10 ml bupivacain 5 mg.ml-1, followed by 4 ml every hour, and the LF+TEA group receiving fentanyl 15 micrograms.kg-1 + TEA. Adrenalin, noradrenalin, systemic vascular resistance (SVR), glucose, cortisol, lactate and free fatty acids were followed during the operation and for 20 h postoperatively. A significant increase in adrenalin, noradrenalin and SVR was found in the HF group whereas this increase was blocked in both epidural groups. An increase in glucose and cortisol was noticed in all groups, but the increase was delayed in the epidural groups. Our results suggest that a more effective blockade of the stress response during ACBS is obtained when TEA is added to general anaesthesia than with high dose fentanyl anaesthesia alone.     

Epidural anesthesia for labor in an ambulatory patient

The effectiveness of two epidural analgesic regimens on the ability to ambulate was compared in women in labor by a prospective, randomized, double-blind design. One group of patients received epidural fentanyl, a 75-micrograms bolus and an infusion of fentanyl 2.5 micrograms/mL at 15 mL/h (FENT, n = 53). A second group received ultra low-dose bupivacaine (0.04%), epinephrine (1.7 micrograms/mL), and fentanyl (1.7 micrograms/mL) (BEF, n = 77), a 15-mL bolus followed by an infusion at 15 mL/h. Adequate analgesia was rapidly obtained in 90.6% of patients in the FENT group and 92.2% of patients in the BEF group (P = 0.89). Seventy percent of patients in the FENT group ambulated versus 68% in the other group. The BEF mixture provided analgesia of longer duration (287 +/- 171 min versus 156 +/- 72 min, P = 0.0001). The number of patients delivering during administration of only their study drug (without needing higher doses of local anesthetics) was 52% for BEF and 21% for FENT (P = 0.0005). Hip flexion weakness precluding ambulation occurred in 17% (P = 0.002) of BEF patients and orthostatic hypotension in 9% (P = 0.08). Neither problem occurred in FENT patients. Neonatal outcome was similar in both groups. Approximately 70% of women receiving epidural analgesia with fentanyl or ultra low-dose bupivacaine, epinephrine, and fentanyl may ambulate safely during labor.     

Effectiveness, side effects and costs of postoperative pain therapy: intravenous and epidural patient-controlled analgesia (PCA)

PURPOSE: Improvement of the quality of analgesia, reduction of side effects and costs by application of epidural (PCEA) in comparison to intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) in postoperative pain treatment. METHODS: 62 patients with upper abdominal surgery took part in this randomised prospective study which was approved by the local ethics committee. Epidural catheters were inserted at T 8/9 (group PCEA). General anaesthesia was performed with propofol, sufentanil 2 micrograms/kg, pancuronium, enflurane and O2:N2O = 1:2. Postoperative analgesia consisted of epidural bupivacaine 0.25% + sufentanil 2 micrograms/ml (BS). (bolus 0.05 ml/kg, lockout 10 min) in group PCEA, or of intravenous morphine (bolus 2 mg. lockout 10 min) in group PCA. The following parameters were recorded until the evening of postoperative day 4: pain intensity at rest (VASR, 1-10) and on coughing (VASH, 1-10), blood pressure, heart rate, blood gas analysis, ability to ambulate, pruritus, nausea/vomiting (PONV), patient satisfaction (0-4), time and expenses for postoperative pain treatment. RESULTS: Median VASR (1 vs 2) and VASH (3 vs 4.5) were lower, cough intensity (2 vs 1) and patient satisfaction score (4 vs 3) were higher in PCEA compared to PCA. Ability to ambulate, pruritus, PONV, haemodynamics, paO2 and paCO2 were comparable. Postoperative pain treatment with PCEA was more time-consuming (407 vs 299 min) and expensive (71 vs 40 S/day) than PCA. CONCLUSION: PCEA in comparison to PCA after major abdominal surgery provides superior analgesia with comparable side effects at approximately 80% higher costs.     

Experimental fetal transesophageal and intracardiac echocardiography utilizing intravascular ultrasound technology

The effects of epidural fentanyl on the incidence of maternal hypoxaemia during labour and on neonatal welfare were examined. Women were randomly allocated to receive one of two epidural infusions, bupivacaine 0.125% alone or bupivacaine 0.0625% with 2.5 micrograms.ml-1 fentanyl, and maternal arterial oxygen saturation was monitored continuously until delivery. The median incidence of desaturation (SpO2 < 95%) during the active phase of the second stage of labour was significantly greater in the fentanyl group than in controls (2.9 versus 0.6 min.h-1, p = 0.02). Similarly, the incidence of desaturation to SpO2 < or = 90% was greater in the fentanyl group than in controls (p = 0.02). There was no correlation between maternal oxygenation or plasma fentanyl concentration and neonatal welfare as measured by umbilical arterial and venous blood gas and acid base status, Apgar score and Neurologic and Adaptive Capacity Score.     

The peripheral effect of fentanyl on postoperative pain

The clinical value of the analgesic effect of opioids administered peripherally (except for intraarticular administration) has not been clearly demonstrated. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that fentanyl, added to a local anesthetic for wound infiltration, can enhance postoperative analgesia via a peripheral mechanism. Patients with inguinal herniorrhaphy performed under spinal anesthesia were randomly assigned to one of two groups (n = 10 each). At the end of surgery, the wound was infiltrated with 10 mL of lidocaine 0.5% and fentanyl 0.001% (10 microg) in one group; in the other group, the wound was infiltrated with 10 mL of lidocaine 0.5% alone (and fentanyl 10 microg IM contralaterally). The following variables were determined in a double-blind manner: the duration of anesthesia (response to a von Frey filament), the duration of analgesia (time to mild postoperative pain), postoperative meperidine consumption, intensity visual analog scale of spontaneous and movement-associated pain 24 h after surgery, and wound pain threshold 24 h after surgery (pressure algometry). The addition of fentanyl for wound infiltration enhanced the duration of anesthesia (130+/-37 vs 197+/-27 min; P < 0.001) and decreased the intensity of spontaneous (50+/-17 vs 19+/-18 mm; P < 0.002) and movement-associated (56+/-15 vs 26+/-21 mm; P < 0.002) pain 24 h postoperatively. Differences between groups for other variables were not statistically significant. Fentanyl added to a local anesthetic for wound infiltration after spinal anesthesia can enhance postoperative analgesia by a peripheral mechanism. IMPLICATIONS: Fentanyl can enhance analgesia by a peripheral mechanism. Added to a local anesthetic for wound infiltration, it may be of benefit for the relief of postoperative pain.