Proper Restoration of Excitation-Contraction Coupling in the Dihydropyridine Receptor ��1-null Zebrafish Relaxed Is an Exclusive Function of the ��1a Subunit

The paralyzed zebrafish strain relaxed carries a null mutation for the skeletal muscle dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) β_1a subunit. Lack of β_1a results in (i) reduced membrane expression of the pore forming DHPR α_1S subunit, (ii) elimination of α_1S charge movement, and (iii) impediment of arrangement of the DHPRs in groups of four (tetrads) opposing the ryanodine receptor (RyR1), a structural prerequisite for skeletal muscle-type excitation-contraction (EC) coupling. In this study we used relaxed larvae and isolated myotubes as expression systems to discriminate specific functions of β_1a from rather general functions of β isoforms. Zebrafish and mammalian β_1a subunits quantitatively restored α_1S triad targeting and charge movement as well as intracellular Ca²⁺ release, allowed arrangement of DHPRs in tetrads, and most strikingly recovered a fully motile phenotype in relaxed larvae. Interestingly, the cardiac/neuronal β_2a as the phylogenetically closest, and the ancestral housefly β_M as the most distant isoform to β_1a also completely recovered α_1S triad expression and charge movement. However, both revealed drastically impaired intracellular Ca²⁺ transients and very limited tetrad formation compared with β_1a. Consequently, larval motility was either only partially restored (β_2a-injected larvae) or not restored at all (β_M). Thus, our results indicate that triad expression and facilitation of 1,4-dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) charge movement are common features of all tested β subunits, whereas the efficient arrangement of DHPRs in tetrads and thus intact DHPR-RyR1 coupling is only promoted by the β_1a isoform. Consequently, we postulate a model that presents β_1a as an allosteric modifier of α_1S conformation enabling skeletal muscle-type EC coupling.Excitation-contraction (EC)³ coupling in skeletal muscle is critically dependent on the close interaction of two distinct Ca²⁺ channels. Membrane depolarizations of the myotube are sensed by the voltage-dependent 1,4-dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) in the sarcolemma, leading to a rearrangement of charged amino acids (charge movement) in the transmembrane segments S4 of the pore-forming DHPR α_1S subunit (1, 2). This conformational change induces via protein-protein interaction (3, 4) the opening of the sarcoplasmic type-1 ryanodine receptor (RyR1) without need of Ca²⁺ influx through the DHPR (5). The release of Ca²⁺ from the sarcoplasmic reticulum via RyR1 consequently induces muscle contraction. The protein-protein interaction mechanism between DHPR and RyR1 requires correct ultrastructural targeting of both channels. In Ca²⁺ release units (triads and peripheral couplings) of the skeletal muscle, groups of four DHPRs (tetrads) are coupled to every other RyR1 and hence are geometrically arranged following the RyR-specific orthogonal arrays (6).The skeletal muscle DHPR is a heteromultimeric protein complex, composed of the voltage-sensing and pore-forming α_1S subunit and auxiliary subunits β_1a, α₂δ-1, and γ₁ (7). While gene knock-out of the DHPR γ₁ subunit (8, 9) and small interfering RNA knockdown of the DHPR α₂δ-1 subunit (10-12) have indicated that neither subunit is essential for coupling of the DHPR with RyR1, the lack of the α_1S or of the intracellular β_1a subunit is incompatible with EC coupling and accordingly null model mice die perinatally due to asphyxia (13, 14). β subunits of voltage-gated Ca²⁺ channels were repeatedly shown to be responsible for the facilitation of α₁ membrane insertion and to be potent modulators of α₁ current kinetics and voltage dependence (15, 16). Whether the loss of EC coupling in β₁-null mice was caused by decreased DHPR membrane expression or by the lack of a putative specific contribution of the β subunit to the skeletal muscle EC coupling apparatus (17, 18) was not clearly resolved. Recently, other β-functions were identified in skeletal muscle using the β₁-null mutant zebrafish relaxed (19, 20). Like the β₁-knock-out mouse (14) zebrafish relaxed is characterized by complete paralysis of skeletal muscle (21, 22). While β₁-knock-out mouse pups die immediately after birth due to respiratory paralysis (14), larvae of relaxed are able to survive for several days because of oxygen and metabolite diffusion via the skin (23). Using highly differentiated myotubes that are easy to isolate from these larvae, the lack of EC coupling could be described by quantitative immunocytochemistry as a moderate ∼50% reduction of α_1S membrane expression although α_1S charge movement was nearly absent, and, most strikingly, as the complete lack of the arrangement of DHPRs in tetrads (19). Thus, in skeletal muscle the β subunit enables EC coupling by (i) enhancing α_1S membrane targeting, (ii) facilitating α_1S charge movement, and (iii) enabling the ultrastructural arrangement of DHPRs in tetrads.The question arises, which of these functions are specific for the skeletal muscle β_1a and which ones are rather general properties of Ca²⁺ channel β subunits. Previous reconstitution studies made in the β₁-null mouse system (24, 25) using different β subunit constructs (26) did not allow differentiation between β-induced enhancement of non-functional α_1S membrane expression and the facilitation of α_1S charge movement, due to the lack of information on α_1S triad expression levels. Furthermore, the β-induced arrangement of DHPRs in tetrads was not detected as no ultrastructural information was obtained.In the present study, we established zebrafish mutant relaxed as an expression system to test different β subunits for their ability to restore skeletal muscle EC coupling. Using isolated myotubes for in vitro experiments (19, 27) and complete larvae for in vivo expression studies (28-31) and freeze-fracture electron microscopy, a clear differentiation between the major functional roles of β subunits was feasible in the zebrafish system. The cloned zebrafish β_1a and a mammalian (rabbit) β_1a were shown to completely restore all parameters of EC coupling when expressed in relaxed myotubes and larvae. However, the phylogenetically closest β subunit to β_1a, the cardiac/neuronal isoform β_2a from rat, as well as the ancestral β_M isoform from the housefly (Musca domestica), could recover functional α_1S membrane insertion, but led to very restricted tetrad formation when compared with β_1a, and thus to impaired DHPR-RyR1 coupling. This impairment caused drastic changes in skeletal muscle function.The present study shows that the enhancement of functional α_1S membrane expression is a common function of all the tested β subunits, from β_1a to even the most distant β_M, whereas the effective formation of tetrads and thus proper skeletal muscle EC coupling is an exclusive function of the skeletal muscle β_1a subunit. In context with previous studies, our results suggest a model according to which β_1a acts as an allosteric modifier of α_1S conformation. Only in the presence of β_1a, the α_1S subunit is properly folded to allow RyR1 anchoring and thus skeletal muscle-type EC coupling.     

Specific Role of Neuronal Nitric-oxide Synthase when Tethered to the Plasma Membrane Calcium Pump in Regulating the ��-Adrenergic Signal in the Myocardium

The cardiac neuronal nitric-oxide synthase (nNOS) has been described as a modulator of cardiac contractility. We have demonstrated previously that isoform 4b of the sarcolemmal calcium pump (PMCA4b) binds to nNOS in the heart and that this complex regulates β-adrenergic signal transmission in vivo. Here, we investigated whether the nNOS-PMCA4b complex serves as a specific signaling modulator in the heart. PMCA4b transgenic mice (PMCA4b-TG) showed a significant reduction in nNOS and total NOS activities as well as in cGMP levels in the heart compared with their wild type (WT) littermates. In contrast, PMCA4b-TG hearts showed an elevation in cAMP levels compared with the WT. Adult cardiomyocytes isolated from PMCA4b-TG mice demonstrated a 3-fold increase in Ser¹⁶ phospholamban (PLB) phosphorylation as well as Ser²² and Ser²³ cardiac troponin I (cTnI) phosphorylation at base line compared with the WT. In addition, the relative induction of PLB phosphorylation and cTnI phosphorylation following isoproterenol treatment was severely reduced in PMCA4b-TG myocytes, explaining the blunted physiological response to the β-adrenergic stimulation. In keeping with the data from the transgenic animals, neonatal rat cardiomyocytes overexpressing PMCA4b showed a significant reduction in nitric oxide and cGMP levels. This was accompanied by an increase in cAMP levels, which led to an increase in both PLB and cTnI phosphorylation at base line. Elevated cAMP levels were likely due to the modulation of cardiac phosphodiesterase, which determined the balance between cGMP and cAMP following PMCA4b overexpression. In conclusion, these results showed that the nNOS-PMCA4b complex regulates contractility via cAMP and phosphorylation of both PLB and cTnI.Neuronal nitric-oxide synthase (nNOS)⁵ is involved in a number of key processes in cardiomyocytes including calcium cycling (1), the β-adrenergic contractile response (2, 3), post-infarct left ventricular remodeling (4), and the regulation of redox equilibrium (5). Moreover, a polymorphism in an nNOS-interacting protein, CAPON, has been found to form a quantitative trait for the determination of the QT interval in humans (6), whereas a mutation in α1-syntrophin (SNTA1), another interacting partner of nNOS, has been associated with long QT syndrome (7). The signaling events downstream of the nNOS-CAPON (8) and nNOS-SNTA1 (7) complexes, which are responsible for mediating cardiac repolarization and sodium current respectively, have been elucidated. The nNOS-containing protein complex is therefore of immediate relevance to human pathology.In recent years, we have shown that the sarcolemmal calcium pump, which ejects calcium to the extracellular compartment (reviewed in Refs. 9 and 10), is an important molecule involved in signal regulation and transmission in the heart (11). We have demonstrated that isoform 4b of the sarcolemmal calcium pump (also known as PMCA4b for plasma membrane calcium/calmodulin-dependent ATPase 4b) modulates signaling through a tight molecular interaction with nNOS, leading to the modulation of β-adrenergic responsiveness in the heart (12). However, the events following signaling through the PMCA4b-nNOS complex remain unknown.In myocardial cells, nNOS has been localized to the sarcolemma (13), sarcoplasmic reticulum (2), and mitochondria (14), and translocation between compartments has been demonstrated (15). It has been speculated that these various localizations provide specificity to NO signaling, but the exact mechanisms have yet to be elucidated. In this study, we show a mechanism by which one fraction of nNOS serves highly specific functions through binding to PMCA4b. As PMCA4b is confined to the sarcolemma and is a calcium pump, it is the first identified protein to fulfill these aggregate functions. 1) It acts as an anchoring protein; 2) it regulates nNOS activity; and 3) it modulates a process at the plasma membrane, i.e. β-adrenergic signaling.     

Alzheimer Disease A�� Production in the Absence of S-Palmitoylation-dependent Targeting of BACE1 to Lipid Rafts

Alzheimer disease β-amyloid (Aβ) peptides are generated via sequential proteolysis of amyloid precursor protein (APP) by BACE1 and γ-secretase. A subset of BACE1 localizes to cholesterol-rich membrane microdomains, termed lipid rafts. BACE1 processing in raft microdomains of cultured cells and neurons was characterized in previous studies by disrupting the integrity of lipid rafts by cholesterol depletion. These studies found either inhibition or elevation of Aβ production depending on the extent of cholesterol depletion, generating controversy. The intricate interplay between cholesterol levels, APP trafficking, and BACE1 processing is not clearly understood because cholesterol depletion has pleiotropic effects on Golgi morphology, vesicular trafficking, and membrane bulk fluidity. In this study, we used an alternate strategy to explore the function of BACE1 in membrane microdomains without altering the cellular cholesterol level. We demonstrate that BACE1 undergoes S-palmitoylation at four Cys residues at the junction of transmembrane and cytosolic domains, and Ala substitution at these four residues is sufficient to displace BACE1 from lipid rafts. Analysis of wild type and mutant BACE1 expressed in BACE1 null fibroblasts and neuroblastoma cells revealed that S-palmitoylation neither contributes to protein stability nor subcellular localization of BACE1. Surprisingly, non-raft localization of palmitoylation-deficient BACE1 did not have discernible influence on BACE1 processing of APP or secretion of Aβ. These results indicate that post-translational S-palmitoylation of BACE1 is not required for APP processing, and that BACE1 can efficiently cleave APP in both raft and non-raft microdomains.Alzheimer disease-associated β-amyloid (Aβ)³ peptides are derived from the sequential proteolysis of β-amyloid precursor protein (APP) by β- and γ-secretases. The major β-secretase is an aspartyl protease, termed BACE1 (β-site APP-cleaving enzyme 1) (1–4). BACE1 cleaves APP within the extracellular domain of APP, generating the N terminus of Aβ. In addition, BACE1 also cleaves to a lesser extent within the Aβ domain between Tyr¹⁰ and Glu¹¹ (β′-cleavage site). Processing of APP at these sites results in the shedding/secretion of the large ectodomain (sAPPβ) and generating membrane-tethered C-terminal fragments +1 and +11 (β-CTF) (5). The multimeric γ-secretase cleaves at multiple sites within the transmembrane domain of β-CTF, generating C-terminal heterogeneous Aβ peptides (ranging in length between 38 and 43 residues) that are secreted, as well as cytosolic APP intracellular domains (6). In addition to BACE1, APP can be cleaved by α-secretase within the Aβ domain between Lys¹⁶ and Leu¹⁷, releasing sAPPα and generating α-CTF. γ-Secretase cleavage of α-CTF generates N-terminal truncated Aβ, termed p3.Genetic ablation of BACE1 completely abolishes Aβ production, establishing BACE1 as the major neuronal enzyme responsible for initiating amyloidogenic processing of APP (4, 7). Interestingly, both the expression and activity of BACE1 is specifically elevated in neurons adjacent to senile plaques in brains of individuals with Alzheimer disease (8). In the past few years additional substrates of BACE1 have been identified that include APP homologues APLP1 and APLP2 (9), P-selectin glycoprotein ligand-1 (10), β-galactoside α2,6-sialyltransferase (11), low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein (12), β-subunits of voltage-gated sodium channels (13), and neuregulin-1 (14, 15), thus extending the physiological function of BACE1 beyond Alzheimer disease pathogenesis.BACE1 is a type I transmembrane protein with a long extracellular domain harboring a catalytic domain and a short cytoplasmic tail. BACE1 is synthesized as a proenzyme, which undergoes post-translational modifications that include removal of a pro-domain by a furin-like protease, N-glycosylation, phosphorylation, S-palmitoylation, and acetylation, during the transit in the secretory pathway (16–20). In non-neuronal cells the majority of BACE1 localizes to late Golgi/TGN and endosomes at steady-state and a fraction of BACE1 also cycles between the cell surface and endosomes (21). The steady-state localization of BACE1 is consistent with the acidic pH optimum of BACE1 in vitro, and BACE1 cleavage of APP is observed in the Golgi apparatus, TGN, and endosomes (22–25). BACE1 endocytosis and recycling are mediated by the GGA family of adaptors binding to a dileucine motif (⁴⁹⁶DISLL) in its cytoplasmic tail (21, 26–31). Phosphorylation at Ser⁴⁹⁸ within this motif modulates GGA-dependent retrograde transport of BACE1 from endosomes to TGN (21, 26–31).Over the years, a functional relationship between cellular cholesterol level and Aβ production has been uncovered, raising the intriguing possibility that cholesterol levels may determine the balance between amyloidogenic and non-amyloidogenic processing of APP (32–34). Furthermore, several lines of evidence from in vitro and in vivo studies indicate that cholesterol- and sphingolipid-rich membrane microdomains, termed lipid rafts, might be the critical link between cholesterol levels and amyloidogenic processing of APP. Lipid rafts function in the trafficking of proteins in the secretory and endocytic pathways in epithelial cells and neurons, and participate in a number of important biological functions (35). BACE1 undergoes S-palmitoylation (19), a reversible post-translational modification responsible for targeting a variety of peripheral and integral membrane proteins to lipid rafts (36). Indeed, a significant fraction of BACE1 is localized in lipid raft microdomains in a cholesterol-dependent manner, and addition of glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor to target BACE1 exclusively to lipid rafts increases APP processing at the β-cleavage site (37, 38). Antibody-mediated co-patching of cell surface APP and BACE1 has provided further evidence for BACE1 processing of APP in raft microdomains (33, 39). Components of the γ-secretase complex also associate with detergent-resistant membrane (DRM) fractions enriched in raft markers such as caveolin, flotillin, PrP, and ganglioside GM1 (40). The above findings suggest a model whereby APP is sequentially processed by BACE1 and γ-secretase in lipid rafts.Despite the accumulating evidence, cleavage of APP by BACE1 in non-raft membrane regions cannot be unambiguously ruled out because of the paucity of full-length APP (APP FL) and BACE1 in DRM isolated from adult brain and cultured cells (41). Moreover, it was recently reported that moderate reduction of cholesterol (<25%) displaces BACE1 from raft domains, and increases BACE1 processing by promoting the membrane proximity of BACE1 and APP in non-raft domains (34). Nevertheless, this study also found that BACE1 processing of APP is inhibited with further loss of cholesterol (>35%), consistent with earlier studies (32, 33). Nevertheless, given the pleiotropic effects of cholesterol depletion on membrane properties and vesicular trafficking of secretory and endocytic proteins (42–47), unequivocal conclusions regarding BACE1 processing of APP in lipid rafts cannot be reached based on cholesterol depletion studies.In this study, we explored the function of BACE1 in lipid raft microdomains without manipulating cellular cholesterol levels. In addition to the previously reported S-palmitoylation sites (Cys⁴⁷⁸/Cys⁴⁸²/Cys⁴⁸⁵) within the cytosolic tail of BACE1 (19), we have identified a fourth site (Cys⁴⁷⁴) within the transmembrane domain of BACE1 that undergoes S-palmitoylation. A BACE1 mutant with Ala substitution of all four Cys residues (BACE1-4C/A) fails to associate with DRM in cultured cells, but is not otherwise different from wtBACE1 in terms of protein stability, maturation, or subcellular localization. Surprisingly, APP processing and Aβ generation were unaffected in cells stably expressing the BACE1-4C/A mutant. Finally, we observed an increase in the levels of APP CTFs in detergent-soluble fractions of BACE1-4C/A as compared with wtBACE1 cells. Thus, our data collectively indicate a non-obligatory role of S-palmitoylation and lipid raft localization of BACE1 in amyloidogenic processing of APP.     

Organization of the BcgI restriction–modification protein for the transfer of one methyl group to DNA

The Type IIB restriction–modification protein BcgI contains A and B subunits in a 2:1 ratio: A has the active sites for both endonuclease and methyltransferase functions while B recognizes the DNA. Like almost all Type IIB systems, BcgI needs two unmethylated sites for nuclease activity; it cuts both sites upstream and downstream of the recognition sequence, hydrolyzing eight phosphodiester bonds in a single synaptic complex. This complex may incorporate four A₂B protomers to give the eight catalytic centres (one per A subunit) needed to cut all eight bonds. The BcgI recognition sequence contains one adenine in each strand that can be N⁶-methylated. Although most DNA methyltransferases operate at both unmethylated and hemi-methylated sites, BcgI methyltransferase is only effective at hemi-methylated sites, where the nuclease component is inactive. Unlike the nuclease, the methyltransferase acts at solitary sites, functioning catalytically rather than stoichiometrically. Though it transfers one methyl group at a time, presumably through a single A subunit, BcgI methyltransferase can be activated by adding extra A subunits, either individually or as part of A₂B protomers, which indicates that it requires an assembly containing at least two A₂B units.     

An N-Glycosylation Site on the��-Propeller Domain of the Integrin ��5 Subunit Plays Key Roles in Both Its Function and Site-specific Modification by��1,4-N-Acetylglucosaminyltransferase III

Recently we reported that N-glycans on the β-propeller domain of the integrin α5 subunit (S-3,4,5) are essential for α5β1 heterodimerization, expression, and cell adhesion. Herein to further investigate which N-glycosylation site is the most important for the biological function and regulation, we characterized the S-3,4,5 mutants in detail. We found that site-4 is a key site that can be specifically modified by N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase III (GnT-III). The introduction of bisecting GlcNAc into the S-3,4,5 mutant catalyzed by GnT-III decreased cell adhesion and migration on fibronectin, whereas overexpression of N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase V (GnT-V) promoted cell migration. The phenomenon is similar to previous observations that the functions of the wild-type α5 subunit were positively and negatively regulated by GnT-V and GnT-III, respectively, suggesting that the α5 subunit could be duplicated by the S-3,4,5 mutant. Interestingly GnT-III specifically modified the S-4,5 mutant but not the S-3,5 mutant. This result was confirmed by erythroagglutinating phytohemagglutinin lectin blot analysis. The reduction in cell adhesion was consistently observed in the S-4,5 mutant but not in the S-3,5 mutant cells. Furthermore mutation of site-4 alone resulted in a substantial decrease in erythroagglutinating phytohemagglutinin lectin staining and suppression of cell spread induced by GnT-III compared with that of either the site-3 single mutant or wild-type α5. These results, taken together, strongly suggest that N-glycosylation of site-4 on the α5 subunit is the most important site for its biological functions. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration that site-specific modification of N-glycans by a glycosyltransferase results in functional regulation.Glycosylation is a crucial post-translational modification of most secreted and cell surface proteins (1). Glycosylation is involved in a variety of physiological and pathological events, including cell growth, migration, differentiation, and tumor invasion. It is well known that glycans play important roles in cell-cell communication, intracellular signal transduction, protein folding, and stability (2, 3).Integrins comprise a family of receptors that are important for cell adhesion. The major function of integrins is to connect cells to the extracellular matrix, activate intracellular signaling pathways, and regulate cytoskeletal formation (4). Integrin α5β1 is well known as a fibronectin (FN)³ receptor. The interaction between integrin α5 and FN is essential for cell migration, cell survival, and development (5–8). In addition, integrins are N-glycan carrier proteins. For example, α5β1 integrin contains 14 and 12 putative N-glycosylation sites on the α5 and β1 subunits, respectively. Several studies suggest that N-glycosylation is essential for functional integrin α5β1. When human fibroblasts were cultured in the presence of 1-deoxymannojirimycin, which prevents N-linked oligosaccharide processing, immature α5β1 integrin appeared on the cell surface, and FN-dependent adhesion was greatly reduced (9). Treatment of purified integrin α5β1 with N-glycosidase F, which cleaves between the innermost N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) and asparagine N-glycan residues of N-linked glycoproteins, prevented the inherent association between subunits and blocked α5β1 binding to FN (10).A growing body of evidence indicates that the presence of the appropriate oligosaccharide can modulate integrin activation. N-Acetylglucosaminyltransferase III (GnT-III) catalyzes the addition of GlcNAc to mannose that is β1,4-linked to an underlying N-acetylglucosamine, producing what is known as a “bisecting” GlcNAc linkage as shown in Fig. 1B. GnT-III is generally regarded as a key glycosyltransferase in N-glycan biosynthetic pathways and contributes to inhibition of metastasis. The introduction of a bisecting GlcNAc catalyzed by GnT-III suppresses additional processing and elongation of N-glycans. These reactions, which are catalyzed in vitro by other glycosyltransferases, such as N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase V (GnT-V), which catalyzes the formation of β1,6 GlcNAc branching structures (Fig. 1B) and plays important roles in tumor metastasis, do not proceed because the enzymes cannot utilize the bisected N-glycans as a substrate. Introduction of the bisecting GlcNAc to integrin α5 by overexpression of GnT-III resulted in decreased in ligand binding and down-regulation of cell adhesion and migration (11–13). Contrary to the functions of GnT-III, overexpression of GnT-V promoted integrin α5β1-mediated cell migration on FN (14). These observations clearly demonstrate that the alteration of N-glycan structure affected the biological functions of integrin α5β1. Similarly characterization of the carbohydrate moieties in integrin α3β1 from non-metastatic and metastatic human melanoma cell lines showed that expression of β1,6 GlcNAc branched structures was higher in metastatic cells compared with non-metastatic cells, confirming the notion that the β1,6 GlcNAc branched structure confers invasive and metastatic properties to cancer cells. In fact, Partridge et al. (15) reported that GnT-V-modified N-glycans containing poly-N-acetyllactosamine, the preferred ligand for galectin-3, on surface receptors oppose their constitutive endocytosis, promoting intracellular signaling and consequently cell migration and tumor metastasis.Open in a separate windowFIGURE 1.Potential N-glycosylation sites on the α5 subunit and its modification by GnT-III and GnT-V. A, schematic diagram of potential N-glycosylation sites on the α5 subunit. Putative N-glycosylation sites are indicated by triangles, and point mutations are indicated by crosses (N84Q, N182Q, N297Q, N307Q, N316Q, N524Q, N530Q, N593Q, N609Q, N675Q, N712Q, N724Q, N773Q, and N868Q). B, illustration of the reaction catalyzed by GnT-III and GnT-V. Square, GlcNAc; circle, mannose. TM, transmembrane domain.In addition, sialylation on the non-reducing terminus of N-glycans of α5β1 integrin plays an important role in cell adhesion. Colon adenocarcinomas express elevated levels of α2,6 sialylation and increased activity of ST6GalI sialyltransferase. Elevated ST6GalI positively correlated with metastasis and poor survival. Therefore, ST6GalI-mediated hypersialylation likely plays a role in colorectal tumor invasion (16, 17). In fact, oncogenic ras up-regulated ST6GalI and, in turn, increased sialylation of β1 integrin adhesion receptors in colon epithelial cells (18). However, this is not always the case. The expression of hyposialylated integrin α5β1 was induced by phorbol esterstimulated differentiation in myeloid cells in which the expression of the ST6GalI was down-regulated by the treatment, increasing FN binding (19). A similar phenomenon was also observed in hematopoietic or other epithelial cells. In these cells, the increased sialylation of the β1 integrin subunit was correlated with reduced adhesiveness and metastatic potential (20–22). In contrast, the enzymatic removal of α2,8-linked oligosialic acids from the α5 integrin subunit inhibited cell adhesion to FN (23). Collectively these findings suggest that the interaction of integrin α5β1 with FN is dependent on its N-glycosylation and the processing status of N-glycans.Because integrin α5β1 contains multipotential N-glycosylation sites, it is important to determine the sites that are crucial for its biological function and regulation. Recently we found that N-glycans on the β-propeller domain (sites 3, 4, and 5) of the integrin α5 subunit are essential for α5β1 heterodimerization, cell surface expression, and biological function (24). In this study, to further investigate the underlying molecular mechanism of GnT-III-regulated biological functions, we characterized the N-glycans on the α5 subunit in detail using genetic and biochemical approaches and found that site-4 is a key site that can be specifically modified by GnT-III.     

Src Phosphorylation of ��-Receptor Is Responsible for the Receptor Switching from an Inhibitory to a Stimulatory Signal

Recent studies have revealed that in G protein-coupled receptor signalings switching between G protein- and β-arrestin (βArr)-dependent pathways occurs. In the case of opioid receptors, the signal is switched from the initial inhibition of adenylyl cyclase (AC) to an increase in AC activity (AC activation) during prolonged agonist treatment. The mechanism of such AC activation has been suggested to involve the switching of G proteins activated by the receptor, phosphorylation of signaling molecules, or receptor-dependent recruitment of cellular proteins. Using protein kinase inhibitors, dominant negative mutant studies and mouse embryonic fibroblast cells isolated from Src kinase knock-out mice, we demonstrated that μ-opioid receptor (OPRM1)-mediated AC activation requires direct association and activation of Src kinase by lipid raft-located OPRM1. Such Src activation was independent of βArr as indicated by the ability of OPRM1 to activate Src and AC after prolonged agonist treatment in mouse embryonic fibroblast cells lacking both βArr-1 and -2. Instead the switching of OPRM1 signals was dependent on the heterotrimeric G protein, specifically G_i2 α-subunit. Among the Src kinase substrates, OPRM1 was phosphorylated at Tyr³³⁶ within NPXXY motif by Src during AC activation. Mutation of this Tyr residue, together with mutation of Tyr¹⁶⁶ within the DRY motif to Phe, resulted in the complete blunting of AC activation. Thus, the recruitment and activation of Src kinase by OPRM1 during chronic agonist treatment, which eventually results in the receptor tyrosine phosphorylation, is the key for switching the opioid receptor signals from its initial AC inhibition to subsequent AC activation.Classical G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)² signaling involves the activation of specific heterotrimeric G proteins and the subsequent dissociation of α- and βγ-subunits. These G protein subunits serve as the activators and/or inhibitors of several effector systems, including adenylyl cyclases, phospholipases, and ion channels (1). However, recent studies have shown that GPCR signaling deviates from such a classical linear model. For example, in kidney and colonic epithelial cells, protease-activated receptor 1 can transduce its signals through either Gα_i/o or Gα_q subunits via inhibition of small GTPase RhoA or activation of RhoD. Thus, RhoA and RhoD act as molecular switches between the negative and positive signaling activity of protease-activated receptor 1 (2). Another example is the ability of β₂-adrenergic receptor to switch from G_s-dependent pathways to non-classical signaling pathways by coupling to pertussis toxin-sensitive G_i proteins in a cAMP-dependent protein kinase/protein kinase C phosphorylation-dependent manner. In this case, the phosphorylation-induced switch in G protein coupling provides the receptor access to alternative signaling pathways. For β₂-adrenergic receptors, this leads to a G_i-dependent activation of MAP kinase (3, 4). Furthermore the involvement of protein scaffolds, such as β-arrestins in the MAP kinase cascade, could also alter the GPCR signaling (5–8). Hence the formation of “signaling units” or “receptosomes” would influence the GPCR signaling process and destination.For opioid receptors, which are members of the rhodopsin GPCR subfamily receptors, signal switching is also observed. Normally opioid receptors inhibit AC activity, activate the MAP kinases and Kir3 K⁺ channels, inhibit the voltage-dependent Ca²⁺ channels, and regulate other effectors such as phospholipase C (9). However, during prolonged agonist treatment, not only is there a blunting of these cellular responses but also a compensatory increase in intracellular cAMP level, which is particularly significant upon the removal of the agonist or the addition of an antagonist such as naloxone (10–12). This compensatory adenylyl cyclase activation phenomenon has been postulated to be responsible for the development of drug tolerance and dependence (13). The observed change from receptor-mediated AC inhibition to receptor-mediated AC activation reflects possible receptor signal switching. Although the exact mechanism for such signal changes has yet to be elucidated, activation of specific protein kinases and subsequent phosphorylation of AC isoforms (14, 15) and other signaling molecules (16) have been suggested to be the key for observed AC activation. Among all the protein kinases studied, involvement of protein kinase C, MAP kinase, and Raf-1 has been implicated in the activation of AC (17–19). Alternative mechanisms, such as agonist-induced receptor internalization and the increase in the constitutive activities of the receptor, also have been suggested to play a role in increased AC activity after prolonged opioid agonist treatment (20). Earlier studies also implicated the switching of the opioid receptor from G_i/G_o to G_s coupling during chronic agonist treatment (21). Regardless of the mechanism, the exact molecular events that lead to the switching of opioid receptor from an inhibitory response to a stimulatory response remain elusive.Src kinases, which are members of the nonreceptor tyrosine kinase family, have been implicated in GPCR function because several Src family members such as cSrc, Fyn, and Yes have been reported to be activated by several GPCRs, including β₂- (22) and β₃ (23)-adrenergic, M₂- (24) and M₃ (25)-muscarinic, and bradykinin receptors (26). The GPCRs that are capable of activating Src predominantly couple to G_i/o family G proteins (27). Src kinases appear to associate with, and be activated by, GPCRs themselves either through direct interaction with intracellular receptor domains or by binding to GPCR-associated proteins, such as G protein subunits or β-arrestins (27). Src kinase has been reported to be activated by κ- (28) and δ (29)-opioid receptors and regulate the c-Jun kinase and MAP kinase activities. Src kinase within the nucleus accumbens has been implicated in the rewarding effect and hyperlocomotion induced by morphine in mice (30). However, it is not clear whether the Src kinase is activated and involved in the signal transduction in AC activation after chronic opioid agonist administration.Previously we reported that the lipid raft location of the receptor and the Gα_i2 proteins are two prerequisites for the observed increase in AC activity during prolonged agonist treatment (31, 32). Because various protein kinases including Src kinases and G proteins have been shown to be enriched in lipid rafts (33), the roles of these cellular proteins in the eventual switching of opioid receptor signals from inhibition to stimulation of AC activity were examined in the current studies. We were able to demonstrate that the association with and subsequent activation of Src kinase by the μ-opioid receptor (OPRM1), which leads to eventual tyrosine phosphorylation of OPRM1, are the cellular events required for the switching of opioid receptor signaling upon chronic agonist treatment.     

Exposure to 17β-Oestradiol Induces Oxidative Stress in the Non-Oestrogen Receptor Invertebrate Species Eisenia fetida

Background

The environmental impacts of various substances on all levels of organisms are under investigation. Among these substances, endocrine-disrupting compounds (EDCs) present a threat, although the environmental significance of these compounds remains largely unknown. To shed some light on this field, we assessed the effects of 17β-oestradiol on the growth, reproduction and formation of free radicals in Eisenia fetida.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Although the observed effects on growth and survival were relatively weak, a strong impact on reproduction was observed (50.70% inhibition in 100 μg/kg of E₂). We further demonstrated that the exposure of the earthworm Eisenia fetida to a contaminant of emerging concern, 17β-oestradiol (E₂), significantly affected the molecules involved in antioxidant defence. Exposure to E₂ results in the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the stimulation of antioxidant systems (metallothionein and reduced oxidized glutathione ratio) but not phytochelatins at both the mRNA and translated protein levels. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI)-imaging revealed the subcuticular bioaccumulation of oestradiol-3,4-quinone, altering the levels of local antioxidants in a time-dependent manner.

Conclusions/Significance

The present study illustrates that although most invertebrates do not possess oestrogen receptors, these organisms can be affected by oestrogen hormones, likely reflecting free diffusion into the cellular microenvironment with subsequent degradation to molecules that undergo redox cycling, producing ROS, thereby increasing environmental contamination that also perilously affects keystone animals, forming lower trophic levels.     

Identification of the Lipopolysaccharide Core of Yersinia pestis and Yersinia pseudotuberculosis as the Receptor for Bacteriophage ��A1122

φA1122 is a T7-related bacteriophage infecting most isolates of Yersinia pestis, the etiologic agent of plague, and used by the CDC in the identification of Y. pestis. φA1122 infects Y. pestis grown both at 20°C and at 37°C. Wild-type Yersinia pseudotuberculosis strains are also infected but only when grown at 37°C. Since Y. pestis expresses rough lipopolysaccharide (LPS) missing the O-polysaccharide (O-PS) and expression of Y. pseudotuberculosis O-PS is largely suppressed at temperatures above 30°C, it has been assumed that the phage receptor is rough LPS. We present here several lines of evidence to support this. First, a rough derivative of Y. pseudotuberculosis was also φA1122 sensitive when grown at 22°C. Second, periodate treatment of bacteria, but not proteinase K treatment, inhibited the phage binding. Third, spontaneous φA1122 receptor mutants of Y. pestis and rough Y. pseudotuberculosis could not be isolated, indicating that the receptor was essential for bacterial growth under the applied experimental conditions. Fourth, heterologous expression of the Yersinia enterocolitica O:3 LPS outer core hexasaccharide in both Y. pestis and rough Y. pseudotuberculosis effectively blocked the phage adsorption. Fifth, a gradual truncation of the core oligosaccharide into the Hep/Glc (l-glycero-d-manno-heptose/d-glucopyranose)-Kdo/Ko (3-deoxy-d-manno-oct-2-ulopyranosonic acid/d-glycero-d-talo-oct-2-ulopyranosonic acid) region in a series of LPS mutants was accompanied by a decrease in phage adsorption, and finally, a waaA mutant expressing only lipid A, i.e., also missing the Kdo/Ko region, was fully φA1122 resistant. Our data thus conclusively demonstrated that the φA1122 receptor is the Hep/Glc-Kdo/Ko region of the LPS core, a common structure in Y. pestis and Y. pseudotuberculosis.     

The Novel S527F Mutation in the Integrin ��3 Chain Induces a High Affinity ��IIb��3 Receptor by Hindering Adoption of the Bent Conformation

Three heterozygous mutations were identified in the genes encoding platelet integrin receptor αIIbβ3 in a patient with an ill defined platelet disorder: one in the β3 gene (S527F) and two in the αIIb gene (R512W and L841M). Five stable Chinese hamster ovary cell lines were constructed expressing recombinant αIIbβ3 receptors bearing the individual R512W, L841M, or S527F mutation; both the R512W and L841M mutations; or all three mutations. All receptors were expressed on the cell surface, and mutations R512W and L841M had no effect on integrin function. Interestingly, the β3 S527F mutation produced a constitutively active receptor. Indeed, both fibrinogen and the ligand-mimetic antibody PAC-1 bound to non-activated αIIbβ3 receptors carrying the S527F mutation, indicating that the conformation of this receptor was altered and corresponded to the high affinity ligand binding state. In addition, the conformational change induced by S527F was evident from basal anti-ligand-induced binding site antibody binding to the receptor. A molecular model bearing this mutation was constructed based on the crystal structure of αIIbβ3 and revealed that the S527F mutation, situated in the third integrin epidermal growth factor-like (I-EGF3) domain, hindered the αIIbβ3 receptor from adopting a wild type-like bent conformation. Movement of I-EGF3 into a cleft in the bent conformation may be hampered both by steric hindrance between Phe⁵²⁷ in β3 and the calf-1 domain in αIIb and by decreased flexibility between I-EGF2 and I-EGF3.The platelet receptor αIIbβ3 belongs to the family of integrin receptors that consist of noncovalently linked α/β-heterodimers. They are cell-surface receptors that play a role in cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions. Under resting conditions, integrin receptors adopt the low affinity conformation and do not interact with their ligands. Inside-out signaling turns the receptor into a high affinity conformation capable of ligand binding. Ligand binding itself induces additional conformational changes resulting in exposure of neoantigenic sites called ligand-induced binding sites (LIBS)³ and generates in turn outside-in signaling, which triggers a range of downstream signals (1, 2).Integrin αIIbβ3 is expressed on platelets and megakaryocytes. In flowing blood under resting conditions, αIIbβ3 does not interact with its ligand fibrinogen. When a blood vessel is damaged, platelets adhere at sites of vascular injury and become activated. As a consequence, αIIbβ3 adopts the high affinity conformation and binds fibrinogen. This results in platelet aggregation and thrombus formation, which eventually will stop the bleeding (3).The topology of integrins comprises an extracellular, globular, N-terminal ligand-binding head domain (the β-propeller domain in the αIIb chain and the βI domain in the β3 chain) standing on two long legs or stalks (consisting of thigh, calf-1, and calf-2 domains in the αIIb chain and hybrid, plexin/semaphorin/integrin (PSI), four integrin endothelial growth factor-like (I-EGF), and β-tail domains in the β3 chain), followed by transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains (1, 2). X-ray crystal structures of the extracellular domain of non-activated αVβ3 revealed that the legs are severely bent, putting the head domain next to the membrane-proximal portions of the legs (4, 5). The bending occurs between I-EGF1 and I-EGF2 in the β-subunit and between the thigh and calf-1 domains in the α-subunit. This bent conformation represents the low affinity state of the receptor. The high affinity state of the receptor is induced by activation and is associated with a large-scale conformational rearrangement in which the integrin extends with a switchblade-like motion (2). Recently, the crystal structure of the entire extracellular domain of αIIbβ3 in its low affinity conformation was resolved and revealed that this integrin also adopts the bent conformation under resting conditions (6). Structural rearrangements in αIIbβ3 between the bent and extended conformations are similar to what has been reported for other integrins (7).We report here that the S527F mutation in the I-EGF3 region of the β3 polypeptide chain of the αIIbβ3 receptor induces a constitutively active receptor adopting an extended high affinity conformation. This was evidenced by spontaneous PAC-1, fibrinogen, and anti-LIBS antibody binding. These data were further corroborated by modeling the replacement of Ser⁵²⁷ with Phe in the crystal structure of the extracellular domain of αIIbβ3. In this model, the S527F mutation decreases the flexibility of I-EGF3 and appears to prevent movement of the lower β-leg into the cleft between the upper β-leg and the lower α-leg. As a consequence, formation of the bent conformation of the non-activated receptor is hampered.     

In Vitro Mutational Analysis of the β2 Adrenergic Receptor,an In Vivo Surrogate Odorant Receptor

Many G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), such as odorant receptors (ORs), cannot be characterized in heterologous cells because of their difficulty in trafficking to the plasma membrane. In contrast, a surrogate OR, the GPCR mouse β2-adrenergic-receptor (mβ2AR), robustly traffics to the plasma membrane. We set out to characterize mβ2AR mutants in vitro for their eventual use in olfactory axon guidance studies. We performed an extensive mutational analysis of mβ2AR using a Green Fluorescent Protein-tagged mβ2AR (mβ2AR::GFP) to easily assess the extent of its plasma membrane localization. In order to characterize mutants for their ability to successfully transduce ligand-initiated signal cascades, we determined the half maximal effective concentrations (EC50) and maximal response to isoprenaline, a known mβ2AR agonist. Our analysis reveals that removal of amino terminal (Nt) N-glycosylation sites and the carboxy terminal (Ct) palmitoylation site of mβ2AR do not affect its plasma membrane localization. By contrast, when both the Nt and Ct of mβ2AR are replaced with those of M71 OR, plasma membrane trafficking is impaired. We further analyze three mβ2AR mutants (RDY, E268A, and C327R) used in olfactory axon guidance studies and are able to decorrelate their plasma membrane trafficking with their capacity to respond to isoprenaline. A deletion of the Ct prevents proper trafficking and abolishes activity, but plasma membrane trafficking can be selectively rescued by a Tyrosine to Alanine mutation in the highly conserved GPCR motif NPxxY. This new loss-of-function mutant argues for a model in which residues located at the end of transmembrane domain 7 can act as a retention signal when unmasked. Additionally, to our surprise, amongst our set of mutations only Ct mutations appear to lower mβ2AR EC50s revealing their critical role in G-protein coupling. We propose that an interaction between the Nt and Ct is necessary for proper folding and/or transport of GPCRs.     

Neurosteroids Allosterically Modulate Binding of the Anesthetic Etomidate to ��-Aminobutyric Acid Type A Receptors

Photoaffinity labeling of γ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABA_A)-receptors (GABA_AR) with an etomidate analog and mutational analyses of direct activation of GABA_AR by neurosteroids have each led to the proposal that these structurally distinct general anesthetics bind to sites in GABA_ARs in the transmembrane domain at the interface between the β and α subunits. We tested whether the two ligand binding sites might overlap by examining whether neuroactive steroids inhibited etomidate analog photolabeling. We previously identified (Li, G. D., Chiara, D. C., Sawyer, G. W., Husain, S. S., Olsen, R. W., and Cohen, J. B. (2006) J. Neurosci. 26, 11599–11605) azietomidate photolabeling of GABA_AR α1Met-236 and βMet-286 (in αM1 and βM3). Positioning these two photolabeled amino acids in a single type of binding site at the interface of β and α subunits (two copies per pentamer) is consistent with a GABA_AR homology model based upon the structure of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor and with recent αM1 to βM3 cross-linking data. Biologically active neurosteroids enhance rather than inhibit azietomidate photolabeling, as assayed at the level of GABA_AR subunits on analytical SDS-PAGE, and protein microsequencing establishes that the GABA_AR-modulating neurosteroids do not inhibit photolabeling of GABA_AR α1Met-236 or βMet-286 but enhance labeling of α1Met-236. Thus modulatory steroids do not bind at the same site as etomidate, and neither of the amino acids identified as neurosteroid activation determinants (Hosie, A. M., Wilkins, M. E., da Silva, H. M., and Smart, T. G. (2006) Nature 444, 486–489) are located at the subunit interface defined by our etomidate site model.GABA_A³ receptors (GABA_AR) are major mediators of brain inhibitory neurotransmission and participate in most circuits and behavioral pathways relevant to normal and pathological function (1). GABA_AR are subject to modulation by endogenous neurosteroids, as well as myriad clinically important central nervous system drugs including general anesthetics, benzodiazepines, and possibly ethanol (1, 2). The mechanism of GABA_AR modulation by these different classes of drugs is of major interest, including identification of the receptor amino acid residues involved in binding and action of the drugs.In the absence of high resolution crystal structures of drug-receptor complexes, the locations of anesthetic binding sites in GABA_ARs have been predicted based upon analyses of functional properties of point mutant receptors, which identified residues in the α and β subunit M1–M4 transmembrane helices important for modulation by volatile anesthetics (primarily α subunit) and by intravenous agents, including etomidate and propofol (β subunit) (3–5). Position βM2–15, numbered relative to the N terminus of the helix, functions as a major determinant of etomidate and propofol potency as GABA modulators in vitro and in vivo (6–8). By contrast, this residue is not implicated for modulation by the neurosteroids, potent endogenous modulators of GABA_AR (9).Photoaffinity labeling, which allows the identification of residues in proximity to drug binding sites (10, 11), has been used to identify two GABA_AR amino acids covalently modified by the etomidate analog [³H]azietomidate (12): α1Met-236 within αM1 and βMet-286 within βM3. Photolabeling of these residues was inhibited equally by nonradioactive etomidate and enhanced proportionately by GABA present in the assay, consistent with the presence of these two residues in a common drug binding pocket that would be located at the interface between the β and α subunits in the transmembrane domain (12). Mutational analyses identify these positions as etomidate and propofol sensitivity determinants (13–15).A recent mutagenesis study (16) identified two other residues in GABA_AR αM1 and βM3 as critical for direct activation by neurosteroids, αThr-236 (rat numbering, corresponding to α1Thr-237, bovine numbering used here and by Li et al. (12))⁴ and βTyr-284. These residues were also proposed to contribute to a neurosteroid binding pocket in the transmembrane domain at the interface between β and α subunits, based upon their location in an alternative GABA_AR structural model that positioned those amino acids, and not α1Met-236 or βMet-286, at the subunit interface. For GABA_ARs and other members of the Cys-loop superfamily of neurotransmitter-gated ion channels, the transmembrane domain of each subunit is made up of a loose bundle of four α helices (M1–M4), with M2 from each subunit contributing to the lumen of the ion channel and M4 positioned peripherally in greatest contact with lipid, as seen in the structures of the Torpedo nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) (17) and in distantly related prokaryote homologs (18). However, uncertainties in the alignment of GABA_AR subunit sequences relative to those of the nAChR result in alternative GABA_AR homology models (12, 19, 20) that differ in the location of amino acids in the M3 and M4 membrane-spanning helices and in the M1 helix in some models (16, 21).If etomidate and neurosteroids both bind at the same β/α interface in the GABA_AR transmembrane domain, the limited space available for ligand binding suggests that their binding pockets might overlap and that ligand binding would be mutually exclusive. To address this question, we photolabeled purified bovine brain GABA_AR with [³H]azietomidate in the presence of different neuroactive steroids and determined by protein microsequencing whether active neurosteroids inhibited labeling of α1Met-236 and βMet-286, as expected for mutually exclusive binding, or resulted in [³H]azietomidate photolabeling of other amino acids, a possible consequence of allosteric interactions. Active steroids failed to inhibit labeling and enhanced labeling of α1Met-236, clearly indicating that the neurosteroid and the etomidate sites are distinct. Our GABA_AR homology model that positions α1Met-236 and βMet-286 at the β/α interface, but not that of Hosie et al. (16), is also consistent with cysteine substitution cross-linking studies (20, 22), which define the proximity relations between amino acids in the αM1, αM2, αM3, and βM3 helices, and these results support the interpretation that the two residues photolabeled by [³H]azietomidate are part of a single subunit interface binding pocket, whereas the steroid sensitivity determinants identified by mutagenesis neither are at the β/α subunit interface nor are contributors to a common binding pocket.     

The Block of DNA Polymerase �� Strand Displacement Activity by an Abasic Site Can Be Rescued by the Concerted Action of DNA Polymerase �� and Flap Endonuclease 1

Abasic (AP) sites are very frequent and dangerous DNA lesions. Their ability to block the advancement of a replication fork has been always viewed as a consequence of their inhibitory effect on the DNA synthetic activity of replicative DNA polymerases (DNA pols). Here we show that AP sites can also affect the strand displacement activity of the lagging strand DNA pol δ, thus preventing proper Okazaki fragment maturation. This block can be overcome through a polymerase switch, involving the combined physical and functional interaction of DNA pol β and Flap endonuclease 1. Our data identify a previously unnoticed deleterious effect of the AP site lesion on normal cell metabolism and suggest the existence of a novel repair pathway that might be important in preventing replication fork stalling.Loss of purine and pyrimidine bases is a significant source of DNA damage in prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms. Abasic (apurinic and apyrimidinic) lesions occur spontaneously in DNA; in eukaryotes it has been estimated that about 10⁴ depurination and 10² depyrimidation events occur per genome per day. An equally important source of abasic DNA lesions results from the action of DNA glycosylases, such as uracil glycosylase, which excises uracil arising primarily from spontaneous deamination of cytosines (1). Although most AP sites are removed by the base excision repair (BER)⁵ pathway, a small fraction of lesions persists, and DNA with AP lesions presents a strong block to DNA synthesis by replicative DNA polymerases (DNA pols) (2, 3). Several studies have been performed to address the effects of AP sites on the template DNA strand on the synthetic activity of a variety of DNA pols. The major replicative enzyme of eukaryotic cells, DNA pol δ, was shown to be able to bypass an AP lesion, but only in the presence of the auxiliary factor proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and at a very reduced catalytic efficiency if compared with an undamaged DNA template (4). On the other hand, the family X DNA pols β and λ were shown to bypass an AP site but in a very mutagenic way (5). Recent genetic evidence in Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells showed that DNA pol δ is the enzyme replicating the lagging strand (6). According to the current model for Okazaki fragment synthesis (7–9), the action of DNA pol δ is not only critical for the extension of the newly synthesized Okazaki fragment but also for the displacement of an RNA/DNA segment of about 30 nucleotides on the pre-existing downstream Okazaki fragment to create an intermediate Flap structure that is the target for the subsequent action of the Dna2 endonuclease and the Flap endonuclease 1 (Fen-1). This process has the advantage of removing the entire RNA/DNA hybrid fragment synthesized by the DNA pol α/primase, potentially containing nucleotide misincorporations caused by the lack of a proofreading exonuclease activity of DNA pol α/primase. This results in a more accurate copy synthesized by DNA pol δ. The intrinsic strand displacement activity of DNA pol δ, in conjunction with Fen-1, PCNA, and replication protein A (RP-A), has been also proposed to be essential for the S phase-specific long patch BER pathway (10, 11). Although it is clear that an AP site on the template strand is a strong block for DNA pol δ-dependent synthesis on single-stranded DNA, the functional consequences of such a lesion on the ability of DNA pol δ to carry on strand displacement synthesis have never been investigated so far. Given the high frequency of spontaneous hydrolysis and/or cytidine deamination events, any detrimental effect of an AP site on the strand displacement activity of DNA pol δ might have important consequences both for lagging strand DNA synthesis and for long patch BER. In this work, we addressed this issue by constructing a series of synthetic gapped DNA templates with a single AP site at different positions with respect to the downstream primer to be displaced by DNA pol δ (see Fig. 1A). We show that an AP site immediately upstream of a single- to double-strand DNA junction constitutes a strong block to the strand displacement activity of DNA pol δ, even in the presence of RP-A and PCNA. Such a block could be resolved only through a “polymerase switch” involving the concerted physical and functional interaction of DNA pol β and Fen-1. The closely related DNA pol λ could only partially substitute for DNA pol β. Based on our data, we propose that stalling of a replication fork by an AP site not only is a consequence of its ability to inhibit nucleotide incorporation by the replicative DNA pols but can also stem from its effects on strand displacement during Okazaki fragment maturation. In summary, our data suggest the existence of a novel repair pathway that might be important in preventing replication fork stalling and identify a previously unnoticed deleterious effect of the AP site lesion on normal cell metabolism.Open in a separate windowFIGURE 1.An abasic site immediately upstream of a double-stranded DNA region inhibits the strand displacement activity of DNA polymerase δ. The reactions were performed as described under “Experimental Procedures.” A, schematic representation of the various DNA templates used. The size of the resulting gaps is indicated in nt. The position of the AP site on the 100-mer template strand is indicated relative to the 3′ end. Base pairs in the vicinity of the lesion are indicated by dashes. The size of the gaps (35–38 nt) is consistent with the size of ssDNA covered by a single RP-A molecule, which has to be released during Okazaki fragment synthesis when the DNA pol is approaching the 5′-end of the downstream fragment. When the AP site is covered by the downstream terminator oligonucleotide (Gap-3 and Gap-1 templates) the nucleotide placed on the opposite strand is C to mimic the situation generated by spontaneous loss of a guanine or excision of an oxidized guanine, whereas when the AP site is covered by the primer (nicked AP template), the nucleotide placed on the opposite strand is A to mimic the most frequent incorporation event occurring opposite an AP site. B, human PCNA was titrated in the presence of 15 nm (lanes 2–4 and 10–12) or 30 nm (lanes 6–8 and 14–16) recombinant human four subunit DNA pol δ, on a linear control (lanes 1–8) or a 38-nt gap control (lanes 9–16) template. Lanes 1, 5, 9, and 13, control reactions in the absence of PCNA. C, human PCNA was titrated in the presence of 60 nm DNA pol δ, on a linear AP (lanes 2–4) or 38-nt gap AP (lanes 6–9) template. Lanes 1 and 5, control reactions in the absence of PCNA.     

Drosophila TIM Binds Importin α1, and Acts as an Adapter to Transport PER to the Nucleus

Regulated nuclear entry of clock proteins is a conserved feature of eukaryotic circadian clocks and serves to separate the phase of mRNA activation from mRNA repression in the molecular feedback loop. In Drosophila, nuclear entry of the clock proteins, PERIOD (PER) and TIMELESS (TIM), is tightly controlled, and impairments of this process produce profound behavioral phenotypes. We report here that nuclear entry of PER-TIM in clock cells, and consequently behavioral rhythms, require a specific member of a classic nuclear import pathway, Importin α1 (IMPα1). In addition to IMPα1, rhythmic behavior and nuclear expression of PER-TIM require a specific nuclear pore protein, Nup153, and Ran-GTPase. IMPα1 can also drive rapid and efficient nuclear expression of TIM and PER in cultured cells, although the effect on PER is mediated by TIM. Mapping of interaction domains between IMPα1 and TIM/PER suggests that TIM is the primary cargo for the importin machinery. This is supported by attenuated interaction of IMPα1 with TIM carrying a mutation previously shown to prevent nuclear entry of TIM and PER. TIM is detected at the nuclear envelope, and computational modeling suggests that it contains HEAT-ARM repeats typically found in karyopherins, consistent with its role as a co-transporter for PER. These findings suggest that although PER is the major timekeeper of the clock, TIM is the primary target of nuclear import mechanisms. Thus, the circadian clock uses specific components of the importin pathway with a novel twist in that TIM serves a karyopherin-like role for PER.     

Identification of RNF8 as a Ubiquitin Ligase Involved in Targeting the p12 Subunit of DNA Polymerase δ for Degradation in Response to DNA Damage

DNA polymerase δ consists of four subunits, one of which, p12, is degraded in response to DNA damage through the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. However, the identities of the ubiquitin ligase(s) that are responsible for the proximal biochemical events in triggering proteasomal degradation of p12 are unknown. We employed a classical approach to identifying a ubiquitin ligase that is involved in p12 degradation. Using UbcH5c as ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme, a ubiquitin ligase activity that polyubiquitinates p12 was purified from HeLa cells. Proteomic analysis revealed that RNF8, a RING finger ubiquitin ligase that plays an important role in the DNA damage response, was the only ubiquitin ligase present in the purified preparation. In vivo, DNA damage-induced p12 degradation was significantly reduced by shRNA knockdown of RNF8 in cultured human cells and in RNF8^−/− mouse epithelial cells. These studies provide the first identification of a ubiquitin ligase activity that is involved in the DNA damage-induced destruction of p12. The identification of RNF8 allows new insights into the integration of the control of p12 degradation by different DNA damage signaling pathways.     

Do Induced Responses Mediate the Ecological Interactions Between the Specialist Herbivores and Phytopathogens of an Alpine Plant?

Plants are not passive victims of the myriad attackers that rely on them for nutrition. They have a suite of physical and chemical defences, and are even able to take advantage of the enemies of their enemies. These strategies are often only deployed upon attack, so may lead to indirect interactions between herbivores and phytopathogens. In this study we test for induced responses in wild populations of an alpine plant (Adenostyles alliariae) that possesses constitutive chemical defence (pyrrolizidine alkaloids) and specialist natural enemies (two species of leaf beetle, Oreina elongata and Oreina cacaliae, and the phytopathogenic rust Uromyces cacaliae). Plants were induced in the field using chemical elicitors of the jasmonic acid (JA) and salicylic acid (SA) pathways and monitored for one month under natural conditions. There was evidence for induced resistance, with lower probability and later incidence of attack by beetles in JA-induced plants and of rust infection in SA-induced plants. We also demonstrate ecological cross-effects, with reduced fungal attack following JA-induction, and a cost of SA-induction arising from increased beetle attack. As a result, there is the potential for negative indirect effects of the beetles on the rust, while in the field the positive indirect effect of the rust on the beetles appears to be over-ridden by direct effects on plant nutritional quality. Such interactions resulting from induced susceptibility and resistance must be considered if we are to exploit plant defences for crop protection using hormone elicitors or constitutive expression. More generally, the fact that induced defences are even found in species that possess constitutively-expressed chemical defence suggests that they may be ubiquitous in higher plants.