Ultraviolet light-induced DNA damage in transcribed sequences: no change in repair with age

We studied the repair of a plasmid vector containing the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) gene by treating the plasmid with UV light and then transfecting this plasmid into fibroblasts from human fetal lung (in vitro aging) and into primary cultured fibroblasts from rat lung and skin. This methodology allows us to examine the repair of specific transcribed DNA sequences. There was no age-related change in the repair of UV damage in these cells. Rat embryo fibroblasts at different passages transfected with the plasmid also revealed no significant alteration in UV repair as a function of passage number.     

Differential repair of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon DNA adducts from an actively transcribed gene

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are carcinogens with varying potencies. These compounds are metabolized to diol epoxides that react to form DNA adducts. Nucleotide excision repair is a critical cellular defense against these bulky DNA adducts which, if not repaired, can lead to mutations and the initiation of cancer. The structural features of the PAH-adducts play a role in differential repair of these adducts by the global genomic repair subpathway of nucleotide excision repair. DNA adducts derived from the PAHs containing bay-regions are repaired more rapidly than adducts derived from PAHs containing fjord-regions. We have employed the host cell reactivation assay to examine the rate of repair of these adducts in an actively transcribing gene. The pGL3 plasmid containing a luciferase gene was damaged with diol epoxides of benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P-DE), dibenzo[a,l]pyrene (DB[a,l]P-DE), benzo[g]chrysene (B[g]Ch-DE), and benzo[c]phenanthrene (B[c]Ph-DE). The plasmids were transfected into B-lymphocytes with normal repair capacity as well as lymphocytes derived from patients with the XP-A, XP-C and CS-B syndromes. We found that XPA cells were able to transcribe slowly past B[g]Ch-adducts but not the other PAHs. Using the amount of luciferase produced as a measure of DNA repair, we found that the relative rates of repair in the actively transcribing luciferase gene was B[a]P-DE > DB[a,l]P-DE, B[g]Ch-DE, >B[c]Ph-DE in repair proficient and XP-C cells. These results indicate that the abilities to transcribe past and to repair the PAH adducts are dependent on different structural features of the DNA adducts.     

Targeted detection of in vivo endogenous DNA base damage reveals preferential base excision repair in the transcribed strand

Endogenous DNA damage is removed mainly via base excision repair (BER), however, whether there is preferential strand repair of endogenous DNA damage is still under intense debate. We developed a highly sensitive primer-anchored DNA damage detection assay (PADDA) to map and quantify in vivo endogenous DNA damage. Using PADDA, we documented significantly higher levels of endogenous damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells in stationary phase than in exponential phase. We also documented that yeast BER-defective cells have significantly higher levels of endogenous DNA damage than isogenic wild-type cells at any phase of growth. PADDA provided detailed fingerprint analysis at the single-nucleotide level, documenting for the first time that persistent endogenous nucleotide damage in CAN1 co-localizes with previously reported spontaneous CAN1 mutations. To quickly and reliably quantify endogenous strand-specific DNA damage in the constitutively expressed CAN1 gene, we used PADDA on a real-time PCR setting. We demonstrate that wild-type cells repair endogenous damage preferentially on the CAN1 transcribed strand. In contrast, yeast BER-defective cells accumulate endogenous damage preferentially on the CAN1 transcribed strand. These data provide the first direct evidence for preferential strand repair of endogenous DNA damage and documents the major role of BER in this process.     

DNA damage and repair in somatic and germ cells in vivo

Alkylation-induced germ cell mutagenesis in the mouse versus Drosophila is compared based on data from forward mutation assays (specific-locus tests in the mouse and in Drosophila and multiple-locus assays in the latter species) but not including assays for structural chromosome aberrations. To facilitate comparisons between mouse and Drosophila, forward mutation test results have been grouped into three categories. Representatives of the first category are MMS (methyl methanesulfonate) and EO (ethylene oxide), alkylating agents with a high s value which predominantly react with ring nitrogens in DNA. ENU (N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea), MNU (N-methyl-N-nitrosourea), PRC (procarbazine), DEN (N-nitrosodiethylamine), and DMN (N-nitrosodimethylamine) belong to the second category. These agents have in common a considerable ability for modification at oxygens in DNA. Cross-linking agents (melphalan, chlorambucil, hexamethylphosphoramide) from the third category.The most unexpected, but encouraging outcome of this study is the identification of common features for three vastly different experimental indicators of genotoxicity: hereditary damage in Drosophila males, genetic damage in male mice, and tumors (TD₅₀ estimates) in rodents. Based on the above three category classification scheme the following tentative conclusions are drawn. Monofunctional agents belonging to category 1, typified by MMS and EO, display genotoxic effects in male germ cell stages that have passed meiotic division. This phenomenon seems to be the consequence of a repair deficiency during spermiogenesis for a period of 3–4 days in Drosophila and 14 days in the mouse. We suggest that the reason for the high resistance of premeiotic stages, and the generally high TD₅₀ estimates observed for this class in rodents, is the efficient error-free repair of N-alkylation damage. If we accept this hypothesis, then the increased carcinogenic potential in rodents, seen when comparing category 2 (ENU-type mutagens) to category 1 (MMS-type mutagens), along with the ability of category 2 genotoxins to induce genetic damage in premeiotic stages, must presumably be due to their enhanced ability for alkylations at oxygens in DNA; it is this property that actually distinguishes the two groups from each other. In contrast to category 1, examination of class 2 genotoxins (ENU and DEN) in premeiotic cells of Drosophila gave no indication for a significant role of germinal selection, and also removal by DNA repair was less dramatic compared to MMS. Thus category 2 mutagens are expected to display activity in a wide range of both post- and premeiotic germ cell stages. A number of these agents have been demonstrated to be among the most potent carcinogens in rodents. In terms of both hereditary damage and the initiation of cancers (low TD₅₀), cross-linking agents (category 3) comprise a considerable genotoxic hazard. Doubling doses for the mouse SLT have been determined for four cross-linking agents not requiring metabolic conversion and in all four cases the doubling doses for these agents were lower than those for MMS, DES and EMS. In support of this conclusion, two of 10 genotoxic agents, for which data on chromosomal aberrations were available for both somatic cells and germ cells in mice, were cross-linking agents and again the doubling dose estimates are lower than for monofunctional agents. Four cross-linking agents induced mutations in stem cell spermatogonia indicating that this type of agent can be active in a wide range of germ cell stages.Quite in contrast to what is generally observed in unicellular systems and in mammalian cells in culture, both cross-linking agents and MMS-type mutagens (high s value) predominantly produce deletion mutations in postmeiotic male germ cell stages. This is the uniform picture found for both Drosophila and the mouse. It is concluded that in vitro systems, in contrast to Drosophila germ cells, fail to predict this very intriguing feature of mouse germ line mutagenesis. In addition to their potential for induction of deletions and other rearrangements, cross-linking agents are among the most efficient inducers of mitotic recombination in Drosophila. Thus there are several mechanisms by which cross-linking agents may cause loss of heterozygosity for long stretches of DNA sequences, leading to expression of recessive genes. Since a substantial portion of agents used in the chemotherapy of cancers have cross-linking potential, the potential hazards of hereditary damage and cancers associated with this class of genotoxins should, in our opinion, receive more attention than they have in the past.     

Differential repair of DNA damage in specific nucleotide sequences in monkey cells.

An immunological method was developed that isolates DNA fragments containing bromouracil in repair patches from unrepaired DNA using a monoclonal antibody that recognizes bromouracil. Cultured monkey cells were exposed to either UV light or the activated carcinogen aflatoxin B1 and excision repair of damage in DNA fragments containing the integrated and transcribed E. coli gpt gene was compared to that in the genome overall. A more rapid repair, of both UV and AFB1 damage was observed in the DNA fragments containing the E. coli gpt genes. The more efficient repair of UV damage was not due to a difference in the initial level of pyrimidine dimers as determined with a specific UV endonuclease. Consistent with previous observations using different methodology, repair of UV damage in the alpha sequences was found to occur at the same rate as that in the genome overall, while repair of AFB1 damage was deficient in alpha DNA. The preferential repair of damage in the gpt gene may be related to the functional state of the sequence and/or to alterations produced in the chromatin conformation by the integration of plasmid sequences carrying the gene.     

Identification and isolation of transcribed human X chromosome DNA sequences

A human X chromosome specific phage library has been used as a source of X-specific genomic DNA clones which hybridize with cellular RNA. Random cDNA clones were mapped for X chromosome sequence localization and 8 were identified as hybridizing to X chromosome Hind III fragments. All eight also hybridized with autosomal Hind III fragments. The X chromosome genomic sequences corresponding to two of these cDNA clones were isolated from a phage library constructed with the Hind III endonuclease digest products of X enriched DNA. One genomic DNA segment, localized to the short area of the X, shared sequence homology with at least one region of the human Y chromosome. The methodology developed represents a rapid means to obtain a specific genomic DNA clone from a single chromosome when multiple different genomic loci homologous to an expressed DNA sequence exist.     

In vivo repair of UV-irradiation damage of single stranded DNA phage phi-X 174

Summary When E. coli C cells, infected with UV irradiated X 174, were allowed to grow in liquid tris-glucose medium at 37° C with aeration, the UV damage of the single stranded (ss) DNA could be repaired to some extent. Such repair was not possible if the irradiated phage were plated immediately on E. coli C in the usual double layer agar method, or if the infected complexes were initially exposed to 0.02 M KCN for 15 min before they were allowed to grow in tris-glucose medium as before. Our results indicate that in order to be repaired, ss DNA containing UV damage must be able to convert itself to a closed circular double stranded replicative form (RF) within the host cells escaping prior scission. The whole process of repair was found to be dependent on protein synthesis in the infected complexes.     

Chromatin and DNA damage repair

In eukaryotic cells, inheritance of both exact DNA sequence and its arrangement into the chromatin is critical for maintaining stability of the genome. Various DNA lesions induced by endogenous and exogenous factors make this maintanance problematic. To understand completely how cells resolve this problem the knowledge on the nature of these lesions, their detection, and repair within the chromatin environment should be integrated. Understanding of these processes is complicated by multiple types of DNA lesions and repair pathways, as well as the intricate organization of the chromatin. Recent advances in all these directions help to get insight on the repair regulation of DNA within the chromatin at the molecular and cellular level.     

SUMO化修饰与DNA损伤修复

蛋白质的翻译后修饰在很大程度上决定了蛋白质的活性、细胞定位、稳定性及蛋白质之间的相互作用.而在DNA损伤修复过程中,通过调控不同修复蛋白的翻译后修饰来影响他们的活性及细胞定位,进而导致DNA损伤修复途径的不同和修复结果的差异.新近研究表明,蛋白质的SUMO化修饰在DNA损伤修复和基因组稳定性的维护方面发挥重要作用.本文将对SUMO化修饰对DNA损伤修复的调控的最新研究进展做一综述.