Adjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin in patients with advanced carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: a study by the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group.

PURPOSE: Radical surgery represents the treatment of choice for carcinoma of the upper urinary tract. Nevertheless, approximately 50% of patients with stage T >/= 3 or lymph node involvement die from their disease, mainly as a result of the development of distant metastases. Therefore, there is a need for effective adjuvant systemic treatment. We prospectively studied a cohort of patients who underwent surgery for high-risk carcinoma of the upper urinary tract to assess the feasibility of the combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin as adjuvant treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-six patients with tumor stage >/= 3 or lymph node involvement were treated with four cycles of paclitaxel at 175 mg/m(2) and carboplatin (area under the curve 5, Calvert Formula) every 3 weeks following surgery. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 40.6 months. Chemotherapy was well tolerated with 32 patients (89%) receiving full carboplatin and paclitaxel doses without delays. The most frequent grade 3/4 toxicity was neutropenia (39%), which was complicated with fever in only one case (3%). Nonhematologic grade 3 or 4 toxicities were reported in only one case. Five-year survival was 52% (95% CI, 35% to 69%), while 5-year disease-free survival was 40.2% (95% CI, 15.8% to 64.6%). Local failure rate was 30%, as opposed to 17% of patients who developed distant metastases. No patients with grade 2 tumors relapsed during follow-up, as opposed to 60% of patients with grade 3 tumors. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin is feasible and may reduce the risk of distant metastases in high-risk upper urinary tract carcinoma.     

Induction chemotherapy with carboplatin/paclitaxel followed by surgery or standard radiotherapy and concurrent daily low-dose cisplatin for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Five-year survival in patients with unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is less than 10%. In the present phase II study, 43 patients with locally advanced stage IIIA or selected IIIB NSCLC were given four courses of carboplatin AUC = 6 and paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 (3-hour infusion), every 3 weeks. Responsive patients, when possible, underwent surgery followed by standard radiotherapy (50 Gy) or radiotherapy (60 Gy), with concurrent cisplatin as intravenous continuous infusion of 4 mg/m2/d. Sixteen of the 42 evaluable patients achieved partial response (38%) and 3 complete response (CR) (7%) for an overall response rate of 45% (95% CI 30.1-60.2). R0 resectability rate was 29%, with 21% of pathologic CRs. Three more CRs were achieved with concurrent chemoradiotherapy in responsive but unresected patients. Grade III/IV hematologic toxicity was 9%, while one perioperative death occurred. The median duration of response was 14 months (range: 3-44+); median survival was 15 months (range: 9-47+). One-year and 2-year survival rates were 51% and 22%, respectively. The median survival in the responsive resected patients was 26 months, with 2-year survival of 57%. Carboplatin/paclitaxel represents an effective and well-tolerated induction therapy, suggesting its possible role in combination with radiotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced NSCLC in alternative to cisplatin-based regimens.     

Phase II evaluation of paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin in advanced head and neck carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Two-thirds of patients with squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck (SCCHN) at diagnosis have advanced disease with projected 5-year survival rates of 30%. In those patients with distant metastatic or previously treated recurrent disease, response rate to the standard regimen of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil is approximately 30%. The authors investigated the use of paclitaxel and carboplatin in a limited Phase II study in recurrent or metastatic SCCHN to evaluate tumor response, time to progression, survival, and toxicities of this regimen. METHODS: Patients with recurrent or metastatic SCCHN not amenable to further surgical or radiation therapy were treated with 200 mg/m(2) by 3-hour infusion of paclitaxel followed by carboplatin at an area under the concentration time curve of 6 mg/mL/minute via a 20-30-minute infusion every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients were enrolled. Ninety-five percent of patients had received prior surgery and postoperative radiotherapy. The overall response rate was 27% (95% confidence interval, 13-41%) with 1 complete and 9 PRs. Median survival of all patients was 4.9 months, and 1-year survival rate was 16%. There was a 43% response rate and 15.7-month median survival rate in patients with only distant metastatic disease and 38% response rate and a 4.5-month median survival in patients with locoregional and metastatic disease. The response rate for patients with only locoregional recurrence was 7% with a median survival of 4.8 months. Grade 3-4 myelotoxicity occurred in 24% of cycles administered. There were two treatment-related deaths due to neutropenic fever and one additional death on study may have been caused by treatment-induced thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin is significantly myelotoxic and ineffective in patients with previously treated locoregionally recurrent SCCHN, whereas it deserves further evaluation in those patients with distant metastatic disease alone. In those patients with locoregional disease, other more innovative treatments are needed.     

Second-line,low-dose,weekly paclitaxel in patients with stage IIIB/IV nonsmall cell lung carcinoma who fail first-line chemotherapy with carboplatin plus paclitaxel

BACKGROUND: Second-line chemotherapy with docetaxel improves survival and quality of life (QoL) in patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) who fail first-line platinum-based regimens. The authors sought to determine the activity of second-line, low-dose, weekly paclitaxel in patients with NSCLC who failed first-line chemotherapy with carboplatin plus paclitaxel. METHODS: Patients with Stage IIIB/IV NSCLC who had received first-line carboplatin/paclitaxel were treated with low-dose (80 mg/m(2)), weekly paclitaxel at the time of disease progression. Response rates, QoL, and survival were outcome end points. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were included in this analysis. The median age was 62 years (range, 32-76 years), 55% of patients were male, 89% of patients had Stage IV NSCLC, and the Karnofsky performance status was 90-100% in 31% of patients, 70-80% in 55% of patients, and 60% in 14% of patients. Twenty-six percent of patients experienced disease progression as their best response to first-line carboplatin plus paclitaxel, whereas 52% of patients had stable disease, and 23% of patients had achieved a response. The median time from first-line carboplatin plus paclitaxel to second-line, low-dose, weekly paclitaxel was 9.5 weeks (range, 1-78 weeks). The toxicity profile was extremely favorable, with no Grade 4 toxicity and < 10% Grade 3 hematologic or nonhematologic toxicity in all patients with the exception of neuropathy. Ten percent of patients experienced both Grade 2 and Grade 3 neuropathy. The overall objective response rate was 8%. The median survival was 5.2 months (95% confidence interval [95%CI], 3.6-6.2 months), and the 1-year and 2-year survival rates were 20% (95%CI, 10-30%) and 9% (95%CI, 1-16%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Second-line, low-dose, weekly paclitaxel had activity in selected patients with Stage IIIB/IV NSCLC who failed first-line chemotherapy with carboplatin plus paclitaxel. The toxicity profile of this approach is extremely favorable, and outcome expectations are similar to the outcome expectations with other single agents in this setting.     

Paclitaxel plus carboplatin versus gemcitabine plus paclitaxel in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase III randomized trial.

PURPOSE: We conducted this randomized study comparing the activity and toxicity of paclitaxel and gemcitabine (PG) and paclitaxel and carboplatin (PC) combinations for the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemotherapy-naive patients were randomized to paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2) on day 1 plus either carboplatin at an area under the concentration-time curve of 6 on day 1 (group A) or gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 (group B) every 3 weeks. A retrospective cost analysis was conducted using Student's t test to compare independent samples between groups. RESULTS: A total of 509 patients (group A, 252 patients; group B, 257 patients) were enrolled; all characteristics were well balanced. The median survival time was 10.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.8 to 12 months) for group A and 9.8 months (95% CI, 8.0 to 11.7 months) for group B (P =.32). Respective 1-year survival rates were 41.7% and 41.4%. The response rate for group A was 28.0% (2% complete response [CR], 26% partial response [PR] [95% CI, 22% to 34%]), and the response rate for group B was 35.0% (5% CR, 30% PR) [95% CI, 29% to 41%]) (P =.12). Toxicity was mild. Grades 3/4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia for groups A and B were seen in 15% and 15%, 2% and 1%, and 5% and 2%, respectively. The mean total cost (outpatient clinic visits plus chemotherapy drug fee) for group A (euro; 7,612.64) versus group B (euro; 7,484.77) was not statistically significant (P <.66). CONCLUSION: The PG combination is as equally active and well tolerated as the PC combination in patients with advanced NSCLC.     

A phase II study of carboplatin and paclitaxel in esophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of combination carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with esophageal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-five patients were enrolled. Patients were treated with paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2) intravenously (i.v.) over 3 h and carboplatin i.v. at an AUC of 5 mg/h/ml. Thirty-three patients were assessable for toxicity and objective response. RESULTS: A total of 166 treatment courses were administered with a median of five courses per patient. The objective response rate was 43% [90% confidence interval (CI) 0.3-0.58] by the intention-to-treat analysis. The median response duration was 2.8 months (90% CI 2.1-5.4). The median survival time was 9 months (90% CI 7-13.8) and the 1-year survival rate was 43% (90% CI 0.29-0.57). The major grade 3-4 toxicity observed was neutropenia, occurring in 17 patients (52%). There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel is an moderately active and tolerable regimen in advanced esophageal cancer.     

Rational drug sequencing of paclitaxel, gemcitabine and carboplatin in patients with untreated stage IV and select stage IIIB non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION: To conduct a phase II study evaluating the efficacy of rationally sequenced paclitaxel, gemcitabine, and carboplatin in patients with stage IV or select stage IIIB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Patients with select stages IIIB (pleural effusion) and IV NSCLC with an ECOG performance status of 0-1 and no prior chemotherapy for their disease were eligible to participate. Treatment was delivered as follows: paclitaxel at 70 mg/m2 followed by gemcitabine at 300 mg/m2 on day 1, with carboplatin (AUC 5) on day 2 of a 28-day cycle. Response was assessed after every two cycles of therapy. The primary endpoint of this trial was response rate, with secondary endpoints of time to progression and 1 year overall survival. RESULTS: Twenty patients were enrolled on protocol, one of whom never received chemotherapy. The median number of cycles delivered was 3 (range 0-8). A partial response rate of 42% (8/19; 95% CI: 20-67%) and a stable disease rate of 11% (2/19; 95% CI: 1-33%) were observed. The median overall survival time was 9.6 months (95% CI: 4.6-16.6), with a 1 year overall survival rate of 42.1% (95% CI: 24.9-71.3%). Eight patients (42%) stopped treatment due to toxicity. CONCLUSION: Paclitaxel followed by gemcitabine and then carboplatin is an active, albeit complex, regimen in the treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC with insufficient advantage to justify continuation of this regimen.     

Sequential combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma: carboplatin and gemcitabine followed by paclitaxel.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this Phase II study was to evaluate the concept of sequential chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) by the administration of carboplatin plus gemcitabine followed by of paclitaxel. METHODS: Patients with Stage IIIB (pleural effusion) or Stage IV NSCLC and a Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) performance status (PS) of 0--2 were eligible. Therapy consisted of three cycles of carboplatin (area under the concentration-time curve = 5.5 mg/mL per minute) on Day 1 and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on Days 1 and 8 every 21 days followed by three cycles of paclitaxel 225 mg/m(2) every 21 days. RESULTS: Of the 37 eligible patients, 81% had Stage IV disease, and 27% had a PS of 2; all were assessable for survival and toxicity; 32 patients were assessable for response. After treatment with carboplatin plus gemcitabine, there were no complete responses (CRs) and eight partial responses (PRs) (response rate [RR], 25%; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 11--43%). The best overall response was two CRs and eight PRs (RR, 31%; 95% CI, 16--50%). The median survival time was 9.5 months, the 1-year survival rate was 36% (95% CI, 26--44%), the 2-year survival rate was 11% (95% CI, 3--25%), and the median time to disease progression was 4.9 months. The median survivals were 11.2 months for patients with a PS of 0--1 and 6.4 months for patients with a PS of 2. Noncumulative, reversible thrombocytopenia was the principal toxicity with carboplatin/gemcitabine therapy. Paclitaxel therapy was well tolerated, and moderate (Grade 3) neutropenia was the primary toxic effect. One cardiac death occurred, possibly related to paclitaxel. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to evaluate planned sequential chemotherapy in patients with NSCLC. Carboplatin plus gemcitabine followed by paclitaxel was well tolerated and resulted in promising survival in this patient population. This pilot experience forms the basis for an ongoing SWOG trial. Cancer 2001;92:146-52. Published 2001 American Cancer Society.     

Paclitaxel, 5-fluorouracil and hydroxyurea concurrent with radiation in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the standard treatment for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). We conducted a phase II trial using paclitaxel, 5-fluorouracil and hydroxyurea concurrent with radiation (TFHX). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-nine patients with locally advanced NPC were treated with CRT consisting of 4-day continuous infusions of paclitaxel (20 mg/m(2)/d) and 5-fluorouracil (600 mg/m(2)/d), and oral hydroxyurea 500 mg bid for nine doses, every 3 weeks concurrent with radiotherapy (RT). RT consisted of once daily 200cGy fractions 5 times per week to a total of 7000cGy. RESULTS: Complete response was seen in 86% and 71% of patients at 4 and 12 months after CRT. The median follow-up was 34 months. Twenty-three patients experienced relapse. Sixteen deaths occurred: 13 from progressive disease. Three-year overall survival and progression-free survival were 72% and 54% respectively, with locoregional and distant control rates of 83% and 64% at 3 years respectively. Grade 3 to 4 acute toxicities included oropharyngeal mucositis in 81% of patients treated, dermatitis in 63%, weight loss in 32%, and neutropenia in 22%. Neutropenic fever was seen in 14%. There were no treatment-related deaths from acute toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: TFHX is shown to be feasible in NPC. Non-cross resistant induction chemotherapy should be further studied with this regimen.     

Phase III randomised trial comparing paclitaxel/carboplatin with paclitaxel/cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a cooperative multinational trial.

BACKGROUND: The combination of paclitaxel with cisplatin or carboplatin has significant activity in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This phase III study of chemotherapy-na?ve advanced NSCLC patients was designed to assess whether response rate in patients receiving a paclitaxel/carboplatin combination was similar to that in patients receiving a paclitaxel/cisplatin combination. Paclitaxel was given at a dose of 200 mg/m(2) (3-h intravenous infusion) followed by either carboplatin at an AUC of 6 or cisplatin at a dose of 80 mg/m(2), all repeated every 3 weeks. Survival, toxicity and quality of life were also compared. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomised to receive one of the two combinations, stratified according to centre, performance status, disease stage and histology. The primary analyses of response rate and survival were carried out on response-evaluable patients. Survival was also analysed for all randomised patients. Toxicity analyses were carried out on all treated patients. RESULTS: A total of 618 patients were randomised. The two treatment arms were well balanced with regard to gender (83% male), age (median 58 years), performance status (83% ECOG 0-1), stage (68% IV, 32% IIIB) and histology (38% squamous cell carcinoma). In the paclitaxel/carboplatin arm, 306 patients received a total of 1311 courses (median four courses, range 1-10 courses) while in the paclitaxel/cisplatin arm, 302 patients received a total of 1321 courses (median four courses, range 1-10 courses). In only 76% of courses, carboplatin was administered as planned at an AUC of 6, while in 96% of courses, cisplatin was given at the planned dose of 80 mg/m(2). The response rate was 25% (70 of 279) in the paclitaxel/carboplatin arm and 28% (80 of 284) in the paclitaxel/cisplatin arm (P = 0.45). Responses were reviewed by an independent radiological committee. For all randomised patients, median survival was 8.5 months in the paclitaxel/carboplatin arm and 9.8 months in the paclitaxel/cisplatin arm [hazard ratio 1.20, 90% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.40]; the 1-year survival rates were 33% and 38%, respectively. On the same dataset, a survival update after 22 months of additional follow-up yielded a median survival of 8.2 months in the paclitaxel/carboplatin arm and 9.8 months in the paclitaxel/cisplatin arm (hazard ratio 1.22, 90% CI 1.06-1.40; P = 0.019); the 2-year survival rates were 9% and 15%, respectively. Excluding neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, which were more frequent in the paclitaxel/carboplatin arm, and nausea/vomiting and nephrotoxicity, which were more frequent in the paclitaxel/cisplatin arm, the rate of severe toxicities was generally low and comparable between the two arms. Overall quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30 and LC-13) was also similar between the two arms. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first trial comparing carboplatin and cisplatin in the treatment of advanced NSCLC. Although paclitaxel/carboplatin yielded a similar response rate, the significantly longer median survival obtained with paclitaxel/cisplatin indicates that cisplatin-based chemotherapy should be the first treatment option.     

A phase II study of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and hyperfractionated radiation therapy for locally advanced inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer (a Vanderbilt Cancer Center Affiliate Network Study)

PURPOSE: We conducted a prospective phase II study to determine the response rate, toxicity, and survival rate of concurrent weekly paclitaxel, carboplatin, and hyperfractionated radiation therapy (paclitaxel/carboplatin/HFX RT) followed by 2 cycles of paclitaxel and carboplatin for locally advanced unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin regimen was designed to optimize the radiosensitizing properties of paclitaxel during the concurrent phase of treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Forty-three patients with unresectable stage IIIA and IIIB NSCLC from the Vanderbilt Cancer Center and Affiliate Network (VCCAN) institutions were entered onto the study from June 1996 until May 1997. Weekly intravenous (IV) paclitaxel (50 mg/m(2)/l-hour) and weekly carboplatin (AUC 2) plus concurrent hyperfractionated chest RT (1.2 Gy/BID/69.6 Gy) were delivered for 6 weeks followed by 2 cycles of paclitaxel (200 mg/m(2)) and carboplatin (AUC 6). RESULTS: Forty-two patients were evaluable for response and toxicities. Three patients achieved a complete response (7.2%) and 30 patients achieved a partial response (71.4%), for an overall response rate of 78.6% [95% C.I. (66.2%-91.0%)]. The 1- and 2-year overall and progression-free survival rates of all 43 patients were 61.6% and 35% respectively, with a median survival time of 14.3 months. The median follow-up time was 14 months. Esophagitis was the principal toxicity. Grade 3 or 4 esophagitis occurred in 11 patients (26%). There was an incidence of 7% grade 3 and 9.5% grade 4 pulmonary toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: Weekly paclitaxel, carboplatin, plus concurrent hyperfractionated RT is a well-tolerated outpatient regimen. The response rate from this regimen is encouraging and appears to be at least equivalent to the more toxic chemoradiation trials. These findings warrant further clinical evaluation of weekly paclitaxel/carboplatin/HFX RT in a phase III study.     

Phase II study of neoadjuvant carboplatin and paclitaxel followed by radiotherapy and concurrent cisplatin in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: therapeutic monitoring with plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA.

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy of neoadjuvant paclitaxel and carboplatin (TC) followed by concurrent cisplatin and radiotherapy (RT) in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and to monitor treatment response with plasma Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-one patients with International Union Against Cancer stages III and IV undifferentiated NPC had two cycles of paclitaxel (70 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15) and carboplatin (area under the curve 6 mg/mL/min on day 1) on a 3-weekly cycle, followed by 6 to 8 weeks of cisplatin (40 mg/m2 weekly) and RT at 66 Gy in 2-Gy fractions. Plasma EBV DNA was measured serially using the real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction method. Results All patients completed planned treatment. Response to neoadjuvant TC was as follows: 12 patients (39%) achieved partial response (PR) and 18 achieved (58%) complete response (CR) in regional nodes; five patients (16%) achieved PR and no patients achieved CR in nasopharynx. At 6 weeks after RT, one patient (3%) achieved PR and 30 patients (97%) achieved CR in regional nodes, and 31 patients (100%) achieved CR in nasopharynx; 29 patients (93%) had EBV DNA level of less than 500 copies/mL. Neoadjuvant TC was well tolerated, and the most common acute toxicity of cisplatin plus RT was grade 3 mucositis (55%). At median follow-up of 33.7 months (range, 7 to 39.3 months), six distant and three locoregional failures occurred. Plasma EBV DNA level increased significantly in eight of nine patients who experienced treatment failure but did not increase in those who did not. The 2-year overall and progression-free survival rates were 91.8% and 78.5%, respectively. CONCLUSION This strategy was feasible and resulted in excellent local tumor control. Serial plasma EBV DNA provides a noninvasive method of monitoring response in NPC.     

Induction carboplatin/paclitaxel followed by concurrent carboplatin/paclitaxel and dose-escalating conformal thoracic radiation therapy in unresectable stage IIIA/B nonsmall cell lung carcinoma: a modified Phase I trial

BACKGROUND: A modified Phase I trial was conducted evaluating the incorporation of 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) into a strategy of sequential and concurrent carboplatin/paclitaxel in Stage III, unresectable nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). In addition, dose escalation of thoracic conformal radiation therapy (TCRT) from 60 to 74 gray (Gy) was performed. Endpoints included response rate, toxicity, and survival. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with unresectable Stage III NSCLC were included. Patients received 2 cycles of induction carboplatin (AUC 6) and paclitaxel (225 mg/m(2)/3 hours) every 21 days. On Day 43, concurrent TCRT and weekly (x6) carboplatin (AUC 2) and paclitaxel (45 mg/m(2)/3 hours) was initiated. The TCRT dose was escalated from 60 to 74 Gy in 4 cohorts. RESULTS: The response rate to induction carboplatin/paclitaxel was 52%. Three patients (10%) experienced disease progression during the induction phase. No dose-limiting toxicity was seen during the escalation of the TCRT dose from 60 to 74 Gy. The major toxicity was esophagitis, with 18% of patients developing Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Grade 3 esophagitis. The overall response rate was 70% (1 complete response and 18 partial responses). Survival rates at 1 and 2 years were 69% and 45%, with a median survival of 21 months. The 1-year progression free survival probability was 41% (95% confidence interval, 23-59%). CONCLUSIONS: Incorporation of 3DCRT with sequential and concurrent carboplatin/paclitaxel is feasible, and dose escalation of TCRT to 74 Gy is possible with acceptable toxicity. Overall response and survival rates are encouraging. Accrual is continuing in a Phase II fashion at 74 Gy with sequential and concurrent carboplatin/paclitaxel.     

Effect of platinum combined with irinotecan or paclitaxel against large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of chemotherapy in patients with large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung (LCNEC) remains unclear. METHODS: Of 42 consecutive patients with LCNEC, 22 with measurable disease receiving chemotherapy were enrolled as the subjects of this study. The clinical characteristics and objective responses to chemotherapy in these patients were analysed retrospectively. RESULTS: The distribution of the disease stage in the patients consisting of 21 males and one female (median age: 67 years; range: 47-78 years) was as follows: stage IIB (n = 1), stage IIIA (n = 1), stage IIIB (n = 5), stage IV (n = 8), and post-operative recurrence (n = 7). Chemotherapy consisted of cisplatin and irinotecan (n = 9), a platinum agent and paclitaxel (n = 6), paclitaxel alone (n = 1), cisplatin and vinorelbine (n = 1), cisplatin and docetaxel (n = 1), and a platinum and etoposide (n = 4). The objective response rate in the 22 patients was 59.1% (95% CI, 38.1-80.1). An objective response was obtained in five of the nine patients receiving irinotecan and five of the seven patients receiving paclitaxel. The progression-free survival, median overall survival and 1-year survival rates were 4.1 months (95% CI, 3.1-5.1), 10.3 months (95% CI, 5.8-14.8) and 43.0% (95% CI, 20.7-65.3), respectively. The median overall survival of the patients treated with irinotecan or paclitaxel was 10.3 months (95% CI, 0-21.8), and the 1-year survival rate of these patients was 47.6% (95% CI, 20.4-74.8). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that irinotecan and paclitaxel may be active against LCNEC.     

Phase II study of paclitaxel and carboplatin in patients with advanced gastric cancer

5-Fluorouracil-based combination chemotherapy is commonly used in patients with advanced gastric cancer, but results with such therapy are fairly modest. Evaluation of newer agents is therefore required in this disease. Paclitaxel has shown promising activity as a single agent in gastric cancer. In vitro, paclitaxel exhibits sequence-dependent synergy with platinum compounds against gastric cancer. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of combination carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Twenty-seven patients with measurable or evaluable advanced gastric cancer were enrolled on the study from April 1996 to July 2000. Patients were treated with paclitaxel 200 mg/m intravenously during 3 hours followed by carboplatin at projected area under the curve 5 mg x h x ml (as per the Calvert formula). Twenty-six patients were assessable for toxicity, and 25 patients were assessable for objective response. Nine of the 27 enrolled patients had a major response for an objective response rate of 33% (95% CI 0.17-0.54) by intention-to-treat analysis. The median response duration was 4.9 months (95% CI 2.8-7.3), and median survival was 7.5 months. The 1-year survival rate was 23%. One hundred seventeen courses were administered with a median of four courses per patient administered. The major toxicity was neutropenia, with grade III to IV neutropenia observed in 9 patients (33%) and neutropenic fever in only 1 patient. Grade III peripheral neuropathy developed in two patients, and grade III myalgia and grade III fatigue developed in one patient each. There were no treatment-related deaths. The combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel is a highly tolerable, regimen with activity comparable to that of other regimens in advanced gastric cancer. This regimen needs to be further evaluated in combination with other agents and as a component of multimodality therapy in gastric cancer.     

Dose-escalating conformal thoracic radiation therapy with induction and concurrent carboplatin/paclitaxel in unresectable stage IIIA/B nonsmall cell lung carcinoma: a modified phase I/II trial

BACKGROUND: A modified Phase I/II trial was conducted evaluating the incorporation of three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy into a strategy of sequential and concurrent carboplatin/paclitaxel in Stage III unresectable nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). The dose of thoracic conformal radiation therapy (TCRT) from 60 to 74 gray (Gy) was increased. Endpoints included response rate, toxicity, and survival. METHODS: Sixty-two patients with unresectable Stage III NSCLC were included. Patients received 2 cycles of induction carboplatin (area under the concentration curve [AUC], 6) and paclitaxel (225 mg/m(2) over 3 hours) every 21 days. On Day 43, concurrent TCRT and weekly (x 6) carboplatin (AUC, 2) and paclitaxel (45 mg/m(2)/3 hours) were initiated. The TCRT dose was escalated from 60 to 74 Gy in 4 cohorts (60, 66, 70, and 74 Gy). RESULTS: The response rate to induction carboplatin/paclitaxel was 40%. Eight patients (13%) progressed on the induction phase. No dose-limiting toxicity was observed during the escalation of the TCRT dose from 60 to 74 Gy. The major toxicity was esophagitis, however, only 8% developed Grade 3/4 esophagitis using Radiation Therapy Oncology Group criteria. The overall response rate was 52%. Survival rates at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years were 71%, 52%, 40%, and 36%, respectively, with a median survival of 26 months. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year progression free survival probabilities were 47%, 35%, and 29%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Incorporation of TCRT with sequential and concurrent carboplatin/paclitaxel is feasible, and dose escalation of TCRT to 74 Gy is possible with acceptable toxicity. Overall response and survival rates are encouraging. Both locoregional and distant failure remain problematic in this population of patients.     

Concurrent hyperfractionated radiotherapy and low-dose daily carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: long-term results of a phase II study.

PURPOSE: To investigate the feasibility and activity of hyperfractionated radiation therapy (Hfx RT) and concurrent chemotherapy (CT) consisting of low-dose, daily carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-four patients started their treatment on day 1 with 30 mg/m(2) of paclitaxel administered by 1-hour infusion. Hfx RT began on day 2 using 1.3 Gy bid to a total dose of 67.6 Gy and concurrent low-dose daily CT consisting of 25 mg/m(2) of carboplatin and 10 mg/m(2) of paclitaxel, both given Mondays to Fridays during RT course. RESULTS: Objective response rate was 83% and included complete response in 27 patients (42%) and partial response in 26 patients (41%). Ten patients (16%) had stable disease, whereas only one patient (2%) had progressive disease. The median survival time was 28 months, and 3- and 5-year survival rates were 37% and 26%, respectively. The median time to local progression was 26 months, and 3- and 5-year local progression-free survival rates were 37% and 33%, respectively. The median time to distant metastasis was 25 months, and 3- and 5- year distant metastasis-free survival rates were 37% and 31%, respectively. Acute high-grade (>/= grade 3) toxicity was hematologic (25%), esophageal (17%), bronchopulmonary (13%), and skin (9%). Late high-grade toxicity was infrequent. CONCLUSION: This combined Hfx RT/TC regimen produced results that are among the best ever reported and warrants further study in a prospective randomized fashion.     

Induction cetuximab,paclitaxel, and carboplatin followed by chemoradiation with cetuximab,paclitaxel, and carboplatin for stage III/IV head and neck squamous cancer: a phase II ECOG-ACRIN trial (E2303)

BackgroundE2303 evaluated cetuximab, paclitaxel, and carboplatin used as induction therapy and concomitant with radiation therapy in patients with stage III/IV head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) determining pathologic complete response (CR), event-free survival (EFS), and toxicity.Patients and methodsPatients with resectable stage III/IV HNSCC underwent induction therapy with planned primary site restaging biopsies (at week 8 in clinical complete responders and at week 14 if disease persisted). Chemoradiation (CRT) began week 9. If week 14 biopsy was negative, patients completed CRT (68–72 Gy); otherwise, resection was carried out. p16 protein expression status was correlated with response/survival.ResultsSeventy-four patients were enrolled; 63 were eligible. Forty-four (70%) were free of surgery to the primary site, progression, and death 1-year post-treatment. Following induction, 41 (23 CR) underwent week 8 primary site biopsy and 24 (59%) had no tumor (pathologic CR). Week 14 biopsy during chemoradiation (50 Gy) in 34 (15 previously positive biopsy; 19 no prior biopsy) was negative in 33. Thus 90% of eligible patients completed CRT. Overall survival and EFS were 78% and 55% at 3 years, respectively. Disease progression in 23 patients (37%) was local only in 10 (16%), regional in 5 (8%), local and regional in 2 (3%), and distant in 5 patients (8%). There were no treatment-related deaths. Toxicity was primarily hematologic or radiation-related. p16 AQUA score was not associated with response/survival.ConclusionsInduction cetuximab, paclitaxel, and carboplatin followed by the same drug CRT is safe and induces high primary site response and promising survival.Clinical trials numberNCT 00089297.     

Concurrent hyperfractionated radiotherapy and low-dose daily carboplatin/paclitaxel in patients with early-stage (I/II) non-small-cell lung cancer: long-term results of a phase II study.

PURPOSE: Feasibility and activity of concurrent hyperfractionated radiotherapy (Hfx RT) and low-dose, daily carboplatin and paclitaxel were investigated in patients with early-stage (I/II) non-small-cell lung cancer in a phase II study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-six patients started their treatment on day 1 with 30 mg/m2 of paclitaxel. Hfx RT using 1.3 Gy bid to a total dose of 67.6 Gy and concurrent low-dose daily carboplatin 25 mg/m2 and paclitaxel 10 mg/m2, both given Mondays through Fridays during the RT course, started from the second day. RESULTS: There were 29 complete responses (52%) and 15 partial responses (27%), and 12 patients (21%), experienced stable disease. The median survival time was 35 months, and 3- and 5-year survival rates were 50% and 36%, respectively. The median time to local progression has not been achieved, but 3- and 5-year local progression-free survival rates were 56% and 54%, respectively. The median time to distant metastasis has not been achieved, but 3- and 5- year distant metastasis-free survival rates were 61% and 61%, respectively. The median and 5-year cause-specific survivals were 39 months and 43%, respectively. Acute high-grade (> 3) toxicity was hematologic (22%), esophageal (7%), or bronchopulmonary (7%). No grade 5 toxicity was observed. Late high-grade toxicity was rarely observed (total, 10%). CONCLUSION: Hfx RT and concurrent low-dose daily carboplatin/paclitaxel was feasible with low toxicity and effective in patients with stage I/II non-small-cell lung cancer. It should continue to be investigated for this disease.     

Randomized phase II trial of carboplatin versus paclitaxel and carboplatin in platinum-sensitive recurrent advanced ovarian carcinoma: a GEICO (Grupo Espanol de Investigacion en Cancer de Ovario) study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine whether the response rate for the paclitaxel-carboplatin combination is superior to carboplatin alone in the treatment of patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with recurrent ovarian carcinoma, 6 months after treatment with a platinum-based regimen and with no more than two previous chemotherapy lines, were randomized to receive carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) 5 (arm A) or paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) + carboplatin AUC 5 (arm B). The primary end point was objective response, following a 'pick up the winner' design. Secondary end points included time to progression (TTP), overall survival, tolerability and quality of life (QoL). RESULTS: Eighty-one patients were randomized and included in the intention-to-treat analysis. The response rate in arm B was 75.6% [26.8% complete response (CR) + 48.8% partial response (PR)] [95% confidence interval (CI) 59.7% to 87.6%] and 50% in arm A (20% CR + 30% PR) (95% CI 33.8% to 66.2%). No significant differences were observed in grade 3-4 hematological toxicity. Conversely, mucositis, myalgia/arthralgia and peripheral neurophaty were more frequent in arm B. Median TTP was 49.1 weeks in arm B (95% CI 36.9-61.3) and 33.7 weeks in arm A (95% CI 25.8-41.5). No significant differences were found in the QoL analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Paclitaxel-carboplatin combination is a tolerable regimen with a higher response rate than carboplatin monotherapy in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian carcinoma.