模型不确定和极端事件冲击下带通胀的最优投资组合选择问题研究

本文研究了投资者在极端事件冲击下带通胀的最优投资组合选择问题, 其中投资者不仅对损失风险是厌恶的而且对模型不确定也是厌恶的. 投资者在风险资产和无风险资产中进行投资. 首先, 利用Ito公式推导考虑通胀的消费篮子价格动力学方程, 其次由通胀折现的终端财富预期效用最大化, 对含糊厌恶投资者的最优期望效用进行刻画. 利用动态规划原理, 建立最优消费和投资策略所满足的HJB方程. 再次, 利用市场分解的方法解出HJB方程, 获得投资者最优消费和投资策略的显式解. 最后, 通过数值模拟, 分析了含糊厌恶、风险厌恶、跳和通胀因素对投资者最优资产配置策略的影响.     

心理账户、损失厌恶与行为资产配置实证研究

基于前景理论和三参照点理论,建立了单心理账户和三心理账户下的线性损失厌恶行为投资组合模型,并利用中证基金指数数据构建了不同市场状态下的行为投资组合,实证研究不同损失厌恶系数、不同参照点、不同心理账户资金配置条件下模型的最优资产配置策略和投资组合绩效,研究发现线性损失厌恶模型更关注下侧损失,损失厌恶系数影响资产配置,注重安全性的投资者偏好低风险资产,而寻求实现抱负水平的投资者更偏好高收益资产。     

激励机制和VaR约束下的DC养老金计划的最优投资

研究了DC养老金经理在单一管理费以及混合收费(同时收取管理费与绩效费)这两种不同的薪酬机制和损失厌恶下的最优投资组合问题。利用凹化方法得到了存在终端财富约束下的最优财富过程和最优投资策略的解析表达式。数值结果表明损失厌恶,VaR约束和薪酬机制会极大地影响最优终端财富的分布。特别地,在决策参照点较高时,损失厌恶会导致混合薪酬机制下最优终端财富的尾部风险较低。     

跳扩散环境下考虑红利支付的动态资产配置问题研究

研究资产价格带跳环境下红利支付对投资者资产配置的影响,投资者将其财富在风险资产和无风险资产中进行分配,在终端财富预期效用最大化标准下,利用动态规划原理建立的HJB方程推导最优配置策略,并得到最优动态资产配置策略的近似解.最后通过数值模拟,分析了跳和红利支付对投资者最优配置策略的影响.结果表明在跳发生的情况下,不管跳的大小和方向如何,投资者都会减少其在风险资产中的配置头寸,同时带有红利支付的资产比不带红利支付的资产对投资者更具吸引力.     

不完全市场下考虑损失厌恶的连续时间投资组合选择

在不完全市场条件下研究了一般情形下的损失厌恶投资者的连续时间投资组合选择模型. 面对市场风险, 投资者的偏好由一个S-型的价值函数定义. 通过把不完全市场转换为完全市场, 利用鞅方法和复制技术, 分别获得了投资者的最优期末财富以及最优投资策略. 最后讨论了一个分段幂函数的例子, 在模型系数为确定的常数情形下, 得到了最优解的显示表达式.     

基于动态非线性损失厌恶的投资组合优化与实证研究

从行为金融学的角度考虑投资者损失厌恶的心理特征,构建了基于线性损失厌恶和非线性损失厌恶行为投资组合模型。利用中国市场数据模拟一种静态情景和四种动态情景,实证研究不同损失厌恶投资组合模型在不同情景下不同损失厌恶程度的最优资产配置策略和投资绩效表现,并将结果与均值方差模型等传统的投资组合模型进行比较。研究发现损失厌恶投资组合模型优于传统投资组合模型,不同情景下不同程度损失厌恶投资者具有不同的资产配置策略,其投资绩效表现也不尽相同。     

具有共同冲击相依性的跳扩散金融市场中有着延迟和违约风险的鲁棒最优再保险和投资策略

在本文中,我们考虑跳扩散模型下具有延迟和违约风险的鲁棒最优再保险和投资问题,保险人可以投资无风险资产,可违约的债券和两个风险资产,其中两个风险资产遵循跳跃扩散模型且受到同种因素带来共同影响而相互关联.假设允许保险人购买比例再保险,特别地再保险保费利用均值方差保费原则来计算.在考虑与绩效相关的资本流入/流出下,保险公司的财富过程通过随机微分延迟方程建模.保险公司的目标是最大程度地发挥终端财富和平均绩效财富组合的预期指数效用,以分别研究违约前和违约后的情况.此外,推导了最优策略的闭式表达式和相应的价值函数.最后通过数值算例和敏感性分析,表明了各种参数对最优策略的影响.另外对于模糊厌恶投资者,忽视模型模糊性风险会带来显著的效用损失.     

基于动态参照点的鲁棒投资组合模型及其拓展

鲁棒投资组合模型是一种适用于收益不确定条件下寻求最优决策的方法。首先考虑投资者对底线的重视,根据当收益触及底线时,激进者和保守者在参照点上的不同变化情况,建立动态参照点模型。接着,一方面将动态参照点作为划分获益和损失的界限值,改进现有的Worst-case Omega(WOmega)模型。另一方面结合投资者对下侧风险更为厌恶的特点,以动态参照点作为下侧风险的基准,改进现有的Relative Robust Portfolio Optimization(RRPO)模型。实证研究中,对于WOmega类模型,结果表明激进行为模型在样本内表现较好,而保守行为模型在样本外表现较好。对于RRPO类模型,结果显示激进行为的收益表现良好,保守行为对标准差及最大损失值的控制较好。随着约束的放松,所有模型的收益都能得到可观提升。     

基于异质理念的动态组合选取模型

不同于传统的代表性经济人的动态投资组合选取模型,引入异质理念,考虑不同投资者的动态组合选取.由于投资者的乐观或悲观情绪直接影响了他对信息的评价,因此用随时间变化的参数体现投资者的情绪,随机组合收益分布是这个参数的函数,不同的投资者或者同一投资者在不同情绪下就有了自己独特的收益分布.通过对均值——方差目标函数的变形,给出了不同投资者对风险资产的最优投入、预期收益和方差的解析表达式,此三项不仅和投资者的风险厌恶度有关,而且和投资期长短有关、与投资者的情绪有关.在对香港恒生指数的实证分析显示,异质性严重影响投资者对风险资产的投入.     

基于Heston随机波动率模型和风险偏好视角的资产负债管理

本文研究基于Heston随机波动率模型的资产负债管理问题。假设金融市场由一个无风险资产和一个风险资产构成,投资者的目标是最大化其终端财富的期望效用。应用随机控制方法,得到了该问题最优资产配置策略的解析表达式和相应值函数的解析解,通过数值算例分析了Heston模型主要参数以及债务对最优资产配置策略的影响。结果表明:配置到风险资产的比例对Heston模型中的参数非常敏感;为了对冲债务风险,负债的引入使得配置到风险资产的比例比无负债情形下的高;在风险厌恶系数变大时,无论投资者是否有负债,其投资到风险资产的比例则越来越低。     

Static portfolio choice under Cumulative Prospect Theory

We derive the optimal portfolio choice for an investor who behaves according to Cumulative Prospect Theory (CPT). The study is done in a one-period economy with one risk-free asset and one risky asset, and the reference point corresponds to the terminal wealth arising when the entire initial wealth is invested into the risk-free asset. When it exists, the optimal holding is a function of a generalized Omega measure of the distribution of the excess return on the risky asset over the risk-free rate. It conceptually resembles Merton’s optimal holding for a CRRA expected-utility maximizer. We derive some properties of the optimal holding and illustrate our results using a simple example where the excess return has a skew-normal distribution. In particular, we show how a CPT investor is highly sensitive to the skewness of the excess return on the risky asset. In the model we adopt, with a piecewise-power value function with different shape parameters, loss aversion might be violated for reasons that are now well-understood in the literature. Nevertheless, we argue that this violation is acceptable.     

Asset allocation under loss aversion and minimum performance constraint in a DC pension plan with inflation risk

In this paper we investigate an optimal investment strategy for a defined-contribution (DC) pension plan member who is loss averse, pays close attention to inflation and longevity risks and requires a minimum performance at retirement. The member aims to maximize the expected S-shaped utility from the terminal wealth exceeding the minimum performance by investing her wealth in a financial market consisting of an indexed bond, a stock and a risk-free asset. We derive the optimal investment strategy in closed-form using the martingale approach. Our theoretical and numerical results reveal that the wealth proportion invested in each risky asset has a V-shaped pattern in the reference point level, while it always increases in the rising lifespan; with a positive correlation between salary and inflation risks, the presence of salary decreases the member’s investment in risky assets; the minimum performance helps to hedge the longevity risk by increasing her investment in risky assets.     

Worst-case portfolio optimization with proportional transaction costs

We study optimal asset allocation in a crash-threatened financial market with proportional transaction costs. The market is assumed to be either in a normal state, in which the risky asset follows a geometric Brownian motion, or in a crash state, in which the price of the risky asset can suddenly drop by a certain relative amount. We only assume the maximum number and the maximum relative size of the crashes to be given and do not make any assumptions about their distributions. For every investment strategy, we identify the worst-case scenario in the sense that the expected utility of terminal wealth is minimized. The objective is then to determine the investment strategy which yields the highest expected utility in its worst-case scenario. We solve the problem for utility functions with constant relative risk aversion using a stochastic control approach. We characterize the value function as the unique viscosity solution of a second-order nonlinear partial differential equation. The optimal strategies are characterized by time-dependent free boundaries which we compute numerically. The numerical examples suggest that it is not optimal to invest any wealth in the risky asset close to the investment horizon, while a long position in the risky asset is optimal if the remaining investment period is sufficiently large.     

Optimal portfolio choice and stochastic volatility

In this paper we examine the effect of stochastic volatility on optimal portfolio choice in both partial and general equilibrium settings. In a partial equilibrium setting we derive an analog of the classic Samuelson–Merton optimal portfolio result and define volatility‐adjusted risk aversion as the effective risk aversion of an individual investing in an asset with stochastic volatility. We extend prior research which shows that effective risk aversion is greater with stochastic volatility than without for investors without wealth effects by providing further comparative static results on changes in effective risk aversion due to changes in the distribution of volatility. We demonstrate that effective risk aversion is increasing in the constant absolute risk aversion and the variance of the volatility distribution for investors without wealth effects. We further show that for these investors a first‐order stochastic dominant shift in the volatility distribution does not necessarily increase effective risk aversion, whereas a second‐order stochastic dominant shift in the volatility does increase effective risk aversion. Finally, we examine the effect of stochastic volatility on equilibrium asset prices. We derive an explicit capital asset pricing relationship that illustrates how stochastic volatility alters equilibrium asset prices in a setting with multiple risky assets, where returns have a market factor and asset‐specific random components and multiple investor types. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Precommitment and equilibrium investment strategies for defined contribution pension plans under a jump–diffusion model

In this paper, we study an optimal investment problem under the mean–variance criterion for defined contribution pension plans during the accumulation phase. To protect the rights of a plan member who dies before retirement, a clause on the return of premiums for the plan member is adopted. We assume that the manager of the pension plan is allowed to invest the premiums in a financial market, which consists of one risk-free asset and one risky asset whose price process is modeled by a jump–diffusion process. The precommitment strategy and the corresponding value function are obtained using the stochastic dynamic programming approach. Under the framework of game theory and the assumption that the manager’s risk aversion coefficient depends on the current wealth, the equilibrium strategy and the corresponding equilibrium value function are also derived. Our results show that with the same level of variance in the terminal wealth, the expected optimal terminal wealth under the precommitment strategy is greater than that under the equilibrium strategy with a constant risk aversion coefficient; the equilibrium strategy with a constant risk aversion coefficient is revealed to be different from that with a state-dependent risk aversion coefficient; and our results can also be degenerated to the results of He and Liang (2013b) and Björk et al. (2014). Finally, some numerical simulations are provided to illustrate our derived results.     

The participation puzzle with reference-dependent expected utility preferences

Expected utility theory with a smooth utility function predicts that, when allocating wealth between a risky and a riskless asset, investors allocate a positive amount to the risky asset whenever its expected return exceeds the riskless rate of return. A large number of people invest none of their wealth in risky assets, though, leading to the ”participation puzzle.” This paper explores whether the participation puzzle can be addressed when the utility function has a kink at the reference wealth level. It shows that when the reference wealth level is initial wealth increased by the riskless rate of return, there exists a range of expected excess returns for the risky asset for which the investor takes no position. Moreover, this range of expected excess returns is described by comparing a common performance measure of stock returns, the Omega Function, to a function of preference parameters. However, if the reference wealth level is any other constant, the usual expected utility prediction holds and investors allocate at least some of their wealth to the risky asset whenever it has a positive expected excess return.     

Portfolio selection in discrete time with transaction costs and power utility function: a perturbation analysis

In this article, we study a multi-period portfolio selection model in which a generic class of probability distributions is assumed for the returns of the risky asset. An investor with a power utility function rebalances a portfolio comprising a risk-free and risky asset at the beginning of each time period in order to maximize expected utility of terminal wealth. Trading the risky asset incurs a cost that is proportional to the value of the transaction. At each time period, the optimal investment strategy involves buying or selling the risky asset to reach the boundaries of a certain no-transaction region. In the limit of small transaction costs, dynamic programming and perturbation analysis are applied to obtain explicit approximations to the optimal boundaries and optimal value function of the portfolio at each stage of a multi-period investment process of any length.