Immune Marker Profiling and Programmed Death Ligand 1 Expression Across NSCLC Mutations

Introduction

Programmed death 1/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) axis inhibitors have been proven effective, especially in patients with tumors expressing PD-L1. Their clinical efficacy in patients with EGFR-activating mutations is still unclear, whereas KRAS mutations seem to be associated with good response.

Osimertinib versus Standard of Care EGFR TKI as First-Line Treatment in Patients with EGFRm Advanced NSCLC: FLAURA Asian Subset

Introduction

Here we report efficacy and safety data of an Asian subset of the phase III FLAURA trial (NCT02296125), which compares osimertinib with standard of care (SoC) EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with previously untreated advanced NSCLC with tumors harboring exon 19 deletion (Ex19del)/L858R EGFR TKI–sensitizing mutations.

Impact of Patient Characteristics,Prior Therapy,and Sample Type on Tumor Cell Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 Expression in Patients with Advanced NSCLC Screened for the ATLANTIC Study

IntroductionWe evaluated the impact of patient characteristics, sample types, and prior non-immunotherapy treatment on tumor cell (TC) programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression using samples from patients with advanced NSCLC.MethodsPatients (N = 1590) screened for the ATLANTIC study submitted a recently acquired (≤3 months) or archival (>3 months to >3 years old) tumor sample for PD-L1 assessment using the VENTANA PD-L1 (SP263) Assay with a cutoff of ≥25% of TCs expressing PD-L1 (TC ≥25%). Samples were acquired either before or after the two or more treatment regimens required for study entry and sample age varied among patients. A subset of patients (n = 123) provided both recent and archival samples.ResultsA total of 517 of 1590 (32.5%) patients had TC greater than or equal to 25%: prevalence was greater in smokers versus nonsmokers (p = 0.0005) and those with EGFR− versus EGFR+ tumors (p = 0.0002); these effects were independent. Prevalence of TC greater than or equal to 25% was increased in recent metastatic versus primary (p = 0.005) and recent versus archival (p = 0.039) samples. Chemotherapy or radiotherapy, but not tyrosine kinase inhibition, before sampling was associated with significantly increased PD-L1 prevalence. PD-L1 status (TC ≥25% cutoff) remained unchanged in 74.0% of patients with recent and archival samples; where PD-L1 status changed, it was more likely to increase than decrease over time or with intervening treatment.ConclusionsSeveral factors potentially impact PD-L1 TC greater than or equal to 25% prevalence in advanced NSCLC; however, no characteristic can be considered a surrogate for PD-L1 expression. Fresh biopsy may provide more accurate assessment of current tumoral PD-L1 expression where a low/negative result is seen in an archival sample, especially if the patient has received intervening therapy.     

Strong Programmed Death Ligand 1 Expression Predicts Poor Response and De Novo Resistance to EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Among NSCLC Patients With EGFR Mutation

Introduction

This study evaluated whether tumor expression of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) could predict the response of EGFR-mutated NSCLC to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy.

Osimertinib Plus Durvalumab in Patients With EGFR-Mutated,Advanced NSCLC: A Phase 1b,Open-Label,Multicenter Trial

IntroductionEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are recommended for EGFR-mutated NSCLC treatment. EGFR activation up-regulates programmed death-ligand 1 expression and other immunosuppressive factors in NSCLC, causing immune microenvironment remodeling. Osimertinib (an EGFR TKI) plus durvalumab (programmed death-ligand 1 blockade) was evaluated in the TATTON study (NCT02143466).MethodsThis open-label, phase 1b study enrolled patients with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC. In part A, patients who had progressed on a previous EGFR TKI received osimertinib (80 mg once daily) plus durvalumab 3 or 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks. In part B, patients received first-line osimertinib plus durvalumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks. However, part B enrollment was terminated early owing to an increased incidence of interstitial lung disease (ILD)-related adverse events (AEs). Safety (primary objective) and preliminary anti-tumor activity determined by objective response rate (ORR), best overall response, duration of response (DOR), and progression-free survival were evaluated.ResultsBefore enrollment termination, 23 and 11 patients received treatment across parts A and B, respectively. The most common AEs across parts A and B were as follows: diarrhea (50%), nausea (41%), and decreased appetite (35%). A total of 12 patients (35%) reported ILD-related AEs (lung disorder, ILD or pneumonitis). In part A, ORR was 43% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 23–66); median DOR was 20.4 months. In part B, ORR was 82% (95% CI: 48–98), median DOR was 7.1 months, and median progression-free survival was 9.0 months (95% CI: 3.5–12.3).ConclusionsThis study highlighted a potential risk of ILD-related AEs when combining osimertinib with durvalumab. Further research looking to combine EGFR TKIs with immune checkpoint inhibitors should be approached with caution.     

Differential Immune-Related Microenvironment Determines Programmed Cell Death Protein-1/Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Blockade Efficacy in Patients With Advanced NSCLC

IntroductionProgrammed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is not a completely reliable predictive marker of the efficacy of anti–programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 therapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. Immune-related tumor microenvironment (TME) is classified into four different types based on the tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) status and PD-L1 expression.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed patients with advanced NSCLC treated with anti–PD-1/PD-L1 therapy between 2015 and 2019. We investigated the association between the efficacy of anti–PD-1/PD-L1 therapy, the types of TME based on PD-L1 (clone: 22C3) expression, the density of CD8-positive TILs assessed by immunohistochemistry, and mutational profiles by next-generation sequencing.ResultsOverall, 228 patients were included in the analysis. The patients were classified into the following four groups: type I: PD-L1_High (tumor proportion score ≥ 50%)/TIL_High (≥85/mm²; n = 73); type II: PD-L1_Low (tumor proportion score < 50%)/TIL_Low (<85/mm²; n = 70); type III: PD-L1_High/TIL_Low (n = 37); and type IV: PD-L1_Low/TIL_High (n = 48). The objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) of anti–PD-1/PD-L1 therapy clearly differed according to the different TME types (ORR and PFS; type I: 64%, 14.5 mo; type II: 12%, 2.1 mo; type III: 24%, 3.6 mo; type IV; 41%, 10.8 mo). In patients with PD-L1_High tumors, type I tumors had significantly better ORR and PFS than type III tumors (ORR: p < 0.001 and PFS: p < 0.001). The presence of TP53 and KRAS mutation was related to the density of CD8-positive TILs and PD-L1 expression, respectively.ConclusionsDifferential types of TME, including PD-L1 expression and TIL status, could accurately predict the efficacy of anti–PD-1/PD-L1 therapy.     

程序性死亡配体1、肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞、FoxP3+调节性T细胞在非小细胞肺癌中的表达及意义

[目的]检测程序性死亡配体1(programmed death ligand 1,PD-1)、肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞(tumor infiltrating lymphocyte,TIL)和叉头转录因子P3(forkhead box P3,FoxP3)在非小细胞肺癌(non-small celllung cancer,NSCL...     

Programmed Death 1 Blockade With Nivolumab in Patients With Recurrent Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma

Introduction

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) has limited treatment options and a poor outcome. Programmed death 1/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) checkpoint inhibitors have proven efficacious in several cancer types. Nivolumab is a fully humanized monoclonal antibody against programmed death 1 with a favorable toxicity profile. In MPM, the immune system is considered to play an important role. We therefore tested nivolumab in recurrent MPM.

Interobserver Reliability of Programmed Cell Death Ligand-1 Scoring Using the VENTANA PD-L1 (SP263) Assay in NSCLC

IntroductionThe VENTANA PD-L1 (SP263) Assay is approved for use with anti–programmed cell death-1/programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-1/PD-L1) therapies in NSCLC and urothelial carcinoma. Here, we investigate interobserver reliability of the SP263 assay, applied to PD-L1 scoring of tumor cells (TCs) in NSCLC.MethodsSix practicing European pulmonary pathologists independently scored the proportion of TCs expressing PD-L1 (TC score) from 200 archival, commercially sourced, formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded NSCLC resections stained using the SP263 assay. Agreement in scores was analyzed using the intraclass correlation coefficient and concordance in patient’s classification using Fleiss’ kappa.ResultsResults from 172 samples showed strong pair-wise correlations between pathologists (R² >0.89) for TC scoring with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.96. Overall agreement was greater than 90% for TC of 1% and above, and greater than 94% for TCs of at least 25% and at least 50%. Fleiss’ kappa showed substantial agreement for TC of 1% and above, and almost perfect agreement for TCs of at least 25% and at least 50%.ConclusionsAssessment of TC score in NSCLC was highly reproducible using the SP263 assay, building confidence in the accuracy of this assay in selection of patients for anti–PD-1/PD-L1 therapy.     

Three-Year Follow-Up of Neoadjuvant Programmed Cell Death Protein-1 Inhibitor (Sintilimab) in NSCLC

IntroductionProgrammed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitors have been proved to be feasible and to have efficacy in multiple cancers, including NSCLC. But few studies have evaluated the effectiveness of PD-1 inhibitor as neoadjuvant therapy with a long-term follow-up. Here, in this phase 1b study with a 3-year follow-up, we reported the clinical outcomes of patients who received the PD-1 inhibitor as neoadjuvant therapy.MethodsTwo doses of sintilimab (intravenously, 200 mg) were used for patients with stages IA to IIIB NSCLC (registration number: ChiCTR-OIC-17013726). Then, surgery was performed within 29 to 43 days after the first dose. All patients underwent positron emission tomography–computed tomography at enrolment and before surgery to evaluate tumor metabolism after administration of PD-1 inhibitor. We also evaluated the expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) as an exploratory analysis in 32 eligible patients. Safety was the primary end point. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), event-free survival, and major pathologic response were the key secondary end points.ResultsWith the mean follow-up of 37.8 months, 3-year OS rate was 88.5% and the 3-year DFS rate was 75.0% among patients who underwent R0 resection. In patients with positive PD-L1 expression, 3-year OS and DFS rates were 95.5% and 81.8%, respectively. Eight patients had recurrent tumors, including local recurrence, lung metastasis, brain metastasis, and bone metastasis. Patients with PD-L1 greater than or equal to 1% had more favorable clinical outcomes than the other subgroup (hazard ratio = 0.275, 95% confidence interval: 0.078–0.976). No more new adverse events have occurred in the 3-year follow-up because we first reported them in the former publication.ConclusionsThis is the first study to report the long-term survival probability of patients with NSCLC receiving PD-1 inhibitors as the neoadjuvant treatment. The 3-year follow-up results revealed that patients with positive PD-L1 expression and high tumor mutation burden have favorable clinical outcomes.     

Mechanisms of Resistance to First-Line Osimertinib in Hispanic Patients With EGFR Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (FRESTON-CLICaP)

IntroductionOsimertinib is a third generation EGFR-TKI inhibitor approved in the first-line setting for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Additionally, it represents the treatment of choice in patients who present with T790M mutations and evidence of relapse of the disease. Effectiveness and safety of this drug have been studied in multiple clinical trials and observational studies, however, information regarding outcomes among Hispanic patients treated with Osimertinib is scarce. The objective of this study was to examine real-world effectiveness and safety of first-line Osimertinib in a cohort of Hispanic patients with NSCLC, emphasizing post-progression outcomes.MethodsThis is a multicenter, multinational, retrospective cohort study of Hispanic patients treated with Osimertinib as first-line for EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of metastatic EGFR-mutated NSCLC who received Osimertinib (80mg/day until evidence of disease progression or presence of intolerable adverse effects) were identified and included. NGS was performed in tumor samples or liquid biopsies among patients who had disease progression. The primary outcome was progression-free survival, and the secondary outcome was post-progression survival.ResultsA total of 94 patients from Mexico, Argentina, Costa Rica, Colombia, Panama, Chile and the USA were included, with a median age of 59 years. Identified mutations included EGFR Exon 19 deletions and EGFR pL858R point mutations. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 14.4 months (95%CI 12.4–18.2 months). Lung/pleura and lymph nodes were the most common sites of progression. Median post-progression survival was 7.73 months (95%CI 4.07 months-Not reached). Factors which negatively affected PFS included presence of liver metastases at diagnosis and a tumor mutational burden > 5 mut/Mb.ConclusionTreatment with first line osimertinib represents an effective and safe option for Hispanic patients with metastatic NSCLC. Liver metastases and a higher tumor mutation burden were associated with a lower PFS. Despite effectiveness, different mechanisms of resistance were identified among the patients in this cohort, including mutations which can be targeted by other therapeutic options.     

Classification of Tumor Immune Microenvironment According to Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Expression and Immune Infiltration Predicts Response to Immunotherapy Plus Chemotherapy in Advanced Patients With NSCLC

IntroductionAccording to mechanisms of adaptive immune resistance, tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) is classified into four types: (1) programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)–negative and tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL)–negative (type I); (2) PD-L1–positive and TIL-positive (type II); (3) PD-L1–negative and TIL-positive (type III); and (4) PD-L1–positive and TIL-negative (type IV). However, the relationship between the TIME classification model and immunotherapy efficacy has not been validated by any large-scale randomized controlled clinical trial among patients with advanced NSCLC.MethodsOn the basis of RNA-sequencing and immunohistochemistry data from the ORIENT-11 study, we optimized the TIME classification model and evaluated its predictive value for the efficacy of immunotherapy plus chemotherapy.ResultsPD-L1 mRNA expression and immune score calculated by the ESTIMATE method were the strongest predictors for the efficacy of immunotherapy plus chemotherapy. Therefore, they were determined as the optimized definition of the TIME classification system. When compared between combination therapy and chemotherapy alone, only the type II subpopulation with high immune score and high PD-L1 mRNA expression was significantly associated with improved progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio = 0.12, 95% confidence interval: 0.06–0.25, p < 0.001) and overall survival (hazard ratio = 0.27, 95% confidence interval: 0.13–0.55, p < 0.001). In the combination group, the type II subpopulation had a much longer survival time, not even reaching the median PFS or overall survival, but the other three subpopulations were susceptible to having similar PFS. In the chemotherapy group, there was no marked association between survival outcomes and TIME subtypes.ConclusionsOnly patients with both high PD-L1 expression and high immune infiltration could benefit from chemotherapy plus immunotherapy in first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC. For patients lacking either PD-L1 expression or immune infiltration, chemotherapy alone might be a better treatment option to avoid unnecessary toxicities and financial burdens.     

Cost–Utility Analysis of Pembrolizumab Versus Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Different PD-L1 Expression Levels

To evaluate the cost–utility of pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy as the first-line setting for metastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from the US health care system perspective, a Markov model was developed to compare the lifetime cost and effectiveness of pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for untreated metastatic NSCLC, based on the clinical data derived from phase III randomized controlled trial (KEYNOTE- 042; ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT02220894). Weibull distribution was fitted to simulate the parametric survival functions. Drug costs were collected from official websites, and utility values were obtained from published literature. Total costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were computed as primary output indicators. The impact of different PD-L1 expression levels on ICER was also evaluated. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the model uncertainty. Compared with chemotherapy, patients treated with pembrolizumab provided an additional 1.13, 1.01, and 0.59 QALYs in patients with PD-L1 expression levels of ≥50%, ≥20%, and ≥1%, with corresponding incremental cost of $53,784, $47,479, and $39,827, respectively. The resultant ICERs of pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy were $47,596, $47,184, and $68,061/QALY, in three expression levels of PD-L1, respectively, all of which did not exceed the WTP threshold of 180,000/QALY. Probability sensitivity analysis outcome supported that pembrolizumab exhibited evident advantage over chemotherapy to be cost-effective. One-way sensitivity analysis found that ICERs were most sensitive to utility value of pembrolizumab in progression survival state. All the adjustment of parameters did not qualitatively change the result. For treatment-naive, metastatic NSCLC patients with PD-L1+, pembrolizumab was estimated to be cost-effective compared with chemotherapy for all PD-L1 expression levels at a WTP threshold of $180,000/QALY in the context of the US health care system.