High-dose ifosfamide plus adriamycin in the treatment of adult advanced soft tissue sarcomas: is it feasible?

BACKGROUND: Adriamycin (ADM) and ifosfamide (IFO) are the two most active agents in the treatment of soft tissue sarcomas (STS) with a clear dose-response relationship. We evaluated the feasibility and toxicity of a high-dose IFO-plus-ADM combination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fourteen patients with advanced disease and nine patients in adjuvant setting received IFO 12.5 g/m2 in 120-hour continuous infusion with Mesna uroprotection and ADM 20 mg/m2 on days 1-3 and G-CSF every three weeks. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients received 89 chemotherapy cycles (70 cycles at full dose). Seventeen patients received the planned treatment, and nine patients required dose reductions. We observed grade 3-4 neutropenia in 52 cycles (59%)/20 patients; grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia in 16 cycles (18%)/nine patients; grade 3-4 anaemia in 24 cycles (27%)/11 patients. Eight patients experienced febrile neutropenia and six patients required blood transfusions. CONCLUSIONS: While feasible, this regimen showed heavy toxicity. Nevertheless, 74% of the patients were able to complete the planned treatment. Adjustment of the schedule of IFO continuous infusion to improve this combination is currently under investigation.     

Phase I study of docetaxel dose escalation in combination with fixed weekly gemcitabine in patients with advanced malignancies

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose of monthly docetaxel combined with fixed-dose weekly gemcitabine and describe the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of the combination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with refractory solid tumors were treated with gemcitabine days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks at a fixed dose of 800 mg/m2. Two docetaxel administration schedules were studied, with the drug administered either day 1 or day 15 at doses of 45, 60, 75, and 100 mg/m2 per cycle. RESULTS: Forty patients received 132 cycles of chemotherapy. On the day-1 schedule, the maximum-tolerated docetaxel dose was the highest planned dose of 100 mg/m2 with two DLT episodes among 12 patients treated with 34 cycles at this dose level. On the day-15 schedule, delivery of the planned docetaxel doses was not feasible because of thrombocytopenia and hepatic dysfunction. Hematologic toxicities included grade 4 neutropenia in 16 patients, with three episodes of febrile neutropenia; grades 3 to 4 thrombocytopenia in nine patients; and anemia that required RBC transfusions in 10 patients. For patients treated at the highest docetaxel dose level, myelosuppression was not dose limiting and only one of 34 cycles was complicated by febrile neutropenia. The most common nonhematologic toxicities were asthenia, flu-like symptoms, and fluid retention. Antineoplastic activity was noteworthy, with partial responses in nine of 21 patients with pretreated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC; 43%; 95% confidence interval, 22 to 66), in four of seven patients with breast cancer, and in one patient with esophageal adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSION: Gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 days 1,8, and 15 can be safely combined with docetaxel 100 mg/m2 day 1 of a 28-day cycle. The observed antitumor activity warrants phase II evaluation.     

Treatment of patients with transitional-cell carcinoma of the urothelial tract with ifosfamide, paclitaxel, and cisplatin: a phase II trial

PURPOSE: A phase II trial of ifosfamide, paclitaxel, and cisplatin (ITP) was conducted in previously untreated patients with advanced transitional-cell carcinoma (TCC) to assess its efficacy and toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty patients with metastatic or unresectable TCC were treated with ifosfamide 1.5 g/m2/d for 3 days with paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 over 3 hours and cisplatin 70 mg/m2 on day 1 of each 28-day treatment cycle. Therapy was continued for a maximum of six cycles. Prophylactic hematopoietic growth factor (recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor [rhG-CSF]) was given on days 6 to 17 of each cycle. RESULTS: Twenty-three of 29 assessable patients (79%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 60% to 92%) demonstrated a major response (six complete [CR] and 17 partial [PR]) with response durations that ranged from 5 to 24+ months. Five patients with T4 bladder primary tumors had a major response, two with pathologic CR. At a median follow-up duration of 17.9 months, nine (31%) patients remain disease-free (range, 10+ to 24+). Hematologic toxicity included anemia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia; febrile neutropenia was observed in 17% of patients and 4% of cycles. No grade 4 nonhematologic toxicity was observed. Grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity included alopecia, allergy (3%), renal insufficiency (13%), and neuropathy (10%). Dose reductions or drug omissions were necessary for adverse events in seven (23%) patients. CONCLUSION: ITP is an active, well-tolerated regimen in previously untreated patients with TCC of the urothelial tract. Further study of this regimen in patients with both TCC and non-transitional-cell urothelial tumors is ongoing.     

A phase I-II study of paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and vinorelbine with filgrastim (rhG-CSF) support in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE: We designed a phase I-II trial of three active agents, paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and vinorelbine, in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to: 1) define the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of paclitaxel with filgrastim (G-CSF) support; and 2) determine the overall response rate and median survival of patients treated on this regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We treated cohorts of patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC with ifosfamide 1.2-1.6 g/m2/day x 3 and vinorelbine 20-25 mg/m2/day x 3 and escalating doses of paclitaxel at 100-175 mg/m2 on day 2 with G-CSF support on a 21-day cycle. One prior experimental single-agent chemotherapy regimen was allowed. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients, were enrolled on this trial: 27 on the phase I portion of the study and an additional 29 at the recommended phase II dose (RPTD). Thirteen patients had received prior chemotherapy. Paclitaxel doses of 175 mg/m2 and 150 mg/m2 produced dose-limiting myelosuppression, and the RPTD was determined to be paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 with ifosfamide 1.2 g/m2/day on days 1-3 and vinorelbine 20 mg/m2/ day on days 1-3 with G-CSF support. The overall response rate was 18%, with a median survival of 6.1 months. Six of 35 patients (17%) treated at the RPTD achieved a partial response to therapy. Grade IV neutropenia was observed in 19 of 35 patients at this dose, with eight patients suffering febrile neutropenia. CONCLUSIONS: This non-cisplatin-containing three-drug regimen has substantial toxicity and low activity in advanced NSCLC, and does not seem to improve on prior regimens. It is unclear whether the lack of efficacy relates to an antagonistic reaction between the specific drugs, administration schedule, or to subtherapeutic doses of the individual agents.     

Phase I trial of low-dose continuous topotecan infusion in patients with cancer: an active and well-tolerated regimen

PURPOSE: The objective of this trial was to define the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of topotecan for a 21-day infusion schedule, repeated every 28 days, in patients with cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Cohorts of four patients received continuous ambulatory infusions of topotecan in escalated duration with doses beginning at 0.20 mg/m2/d for 7 days. Forty-four patients with a histologic diagnosis of cancer refractory to standard therapy were treated with infusions of topotecan for a total of 115 cycles and 1,780 patient-days of infusion. The median number of treatment cycles per patient was two (range, one to eight). All patients were heavily pretreated with chemotherapy and/or radiation. RESULTS: The dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was myelo-suppression, with thrombocytopenia greater than neutropenia seen at the dose level of 0.70 mg/m2/d for 21 days. At the MTD of 0.53 mg/m2, ten patients were treated for a total of 20 courses, resulting in one episode of grade 4 thrombocytopenia and leukopenia, one grade 3 thrombocytopenia, and two grade 3 leukopenias. This dose regimen was well tolerated, with minimal nonhematologic toxicity. Local infusion port complications developed in two patients and two had bacteremia, including one patient with repeated local skin infections. Objective responses were observed in this heavily pretreated population for patients with ovarian cancer (two partial responses and one mixed response in six patients), breast cancer (one partial response and one mixed response in two patients), and for one patient each with renal and non-small-cell lung cancer (two partial remissions). CONCLUSION: Twenty-one-day topotecan infusion is well tolerated at 0.53 mg/m2, with dose-intensity exceeding other schedules for administration of topotecan. The DLT is hematologic, with thrombocytopenia somewhat exceeding leukopenia. Objective responses were observed in seven patients with breast, ovarian, renal, and non-small-cell lung cancer.     

Scaling of movement velocity: a measure of neuromotor retardation in individuals with psychopathology

The combination of ifosfamide, carboplatin and etoposide (modified ICE), was evaluated for its toxicity and activity in relapsed or refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Twenty patients, 14-69 years of age, with relapsed (19 cases) or refractory (one case) aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma were treated with modified ICE therapy, consisting of ifosfamide 6 g/m2 (1.2 g/m2 day 1-5), carboplatin 400 mg/m2 (day 1) and etoposide 500 mg/m2 (100 mg/m2 day 1-5). The regimen was repeated at approximately 28-day intervals. All patients had undergone a doxorubicin-containing regimen before modified ICE therapy. Median total dose of previously received doxorubicin was 406 mg/m2 (range: 200-825 mg/m2). The median interval from diagnosis to modified ICE therapy was 9.4 months (range: 3.6-121 months). Two patients achieved CR and five achieved PR out of 16 patients with measurable lesions (response rate 43.8%; 95% confidence interval 19.0-68.6%). Median overall survival was 227 days (range: 41-552 days) from the start of modified ICE therapy. Myelosuppression was the most serious toxicity, namely 16 patients (80%) and 11 patients (55%) showed grade 4 neutropenia and grade 4 thrombocytopenia after the first course, respectively. Modified ICE therapy might be an active regimen with acceptable toxicity as a salvage chemotherapy in aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.     

Phase II trial of 9-aminocamptothecin administered as a 72-hour continuous infusion in metastatic colorectal carcinoma

PURPOSE: The camptothecin derivative irinotecan has demonstrated clinical activity in metastatic colorectal carcinoma in both chemotherapy-naive and fluorouracil-refractory patients. 9-Aminocamptothecin (9-AC; NSC 603071), another camptothecin derivative, was selected for clinical development based on preclinical activity, including cures in human tumor xenografts resistant to standard anticancer agents. We report a phase II trial of 9-AC in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Colorectal cancer patients with measurable disease, a performance status of 0 to 2 (Zubrod), and no prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease received 9-AC. A cycle of therapy was 35 microg/m2/h for 72 consecutive hours (840 microg/m2/d for 3 days) and rest on days 4 to 14; a course of therapy was defined as two cycles (28 days). Patients were assessed for response after two courses. RESULTS: Seventeen patients with metastatic colorectal cancer were entered onto this trial. No complete or partial responses were noted. Treatment was well tolerated; toxic effects consisted mainly of neutropenia, nausea, vomiting, stomatitis, fatigue, and anemia. Grade 3 to 4 toxicity was limited to neutropenia (grade 3 in four patients and grade 4 in six), anemia (grade 3 in two patients), and vomiting (grade 3 in two patients). No grade 3 or 4 diarrhea occurred. Only two patients had their 9-AC dose reduced to 30 microg/m2/h. The median nadir absolute granulocyte count (AGC) was 1,500/microL. The median number of courses given was two and the median time to disease progression was 8 weeks. CONCLUSION: At the dose and schedule used in this trial, 9-AC lacked antitumor activity in metastatic colorectal cancer. 9-AC infusion schedules of longer duration are currently being investigated in this disease.     

Second-line treatment with ifosfamide and carboplatin in patients with ovarian carcinoma relapsing after treatment with carboplatin

20 patients with ovarian carcinoma whose disease had relapsed (1-42 months, median 4 months) after showing either response or stable disease to carboplatin, were treated with ifosfamide (5 g/m2 intravenously over 24 h, day 1) and carboplatin (200 mg/m2 intravenously day 2) as second-line treatment. The mean number of treatment cycles was 3.5 (range 1-6). The major toxicities were thrombocytopenia (WHO grade 3/4, 25%), neutropenia (WHO grade 3/4, 40%) and encephalopathy (WHO grade 3/4, 15%). Overall response rate was 15% [complete response, 0; partial response, 3 (15%); no change, 5 (25%) and progressive disease, 12 (60%)]. The median survival from the date of second-line treatment was 7 months. This combination offers no advantage over either agent used alone.     

Oviposition and incubation environmental effects on embryonic diapause in a ground cricket

PURPOSE: Recent studies document the value of early combined modality therapy of small cell lung cancer, but also indicate that early thoracic radiation adds to myelosuppression and can complicate further chemotherapy. Other studies indicate that simultaneous use of growth factors with thoracic radiation may be deleterious. However, temporal separation of growth factor use from cytotoxic therapy may allow dose intensity to be maintained/enhanced during combined modality treatment. We sought to integrate filgrastim into a novel chemoradiation regimen for patients with limited small cell lung cancer using an approach that separated growth factor administration from both chemotherapy and thoracic radiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty-seven patients with limited disease small cell lung cancer were enrolled in a Phase I trial of cisplatin, ifosfamide/mesna, oral etoposide, and thoracic radiation (1.5 Gy b.i.d. x 30 fractions days 1-19 cycle 1) +/- filgrastim (5 microg/kg/day). Filgrastim was given on days 20-25 of cycle 1 after completion of radiation and following completion of oral etoposide in subsequent cycles. The primary end point was determination of maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of chemotherapy. Serial cohorts were treated with and without filgrastim. RESULTS: Because of dose-limiting thrombocytopenia, primarily, and nonhematologic toxicity, the MTDs with and without filgrastim were identical (cisplatin 20 mg/m2 i.v. and ifosfamide 1200 mg/m2 i.v., both given days 1-3, and etoposide 40 mg/m2 p.o. days 1-14). Filgrastim use shortened the duration of neutropenia at the MTD (median 4 vs. 7 days), but was not associated with a reduction in febrile neutropenia. Although growth factor administration did not allow dose escalation of this regimen, it did allow chemotherapy doses to be maintained at the MTD more frequently through four cycles of therapy. In the 24 evaluable patients, the overall response rate was 100% (71% partial and 29% complete). CONCLUSIONS: Despite careful attention to the timing of growth factor with chemoradiation, the administration of filgrastim with this regimen did not allow dose escalation. As in many other recent studies of hematopoietic growth factors given prophylactically with chemotherapy, the duration of neutropenia at the MTD was shortened and the need for dose reduction throughout treatment was reduced in patients receiving filgrastim at the MTD.     

Antibiotic resistance pattern and R-plasmids of Acinetobacter calcoaceticus subsp. anitratus

Our objective was to define the maximum tolerated dose of an escalating dose of ifosfamide in combination with a fixed dose of doxorubicin supported by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (Neupogen). Eighteen women with stage IV breast cancer were enrolled in a Phase I study of an escalating dose of ifosfamide (1.2 g/m2/day for 5 days-2.75 g/m2/day for 5 days) with doxorubicin 20 mg/m2/day for 3 days. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was used at 5 microgram/kg on day 6 until hematological recovery. Prophylactic antibiotics were also used. The maximum tolerated dose of ifosfamide in combination with doxorubicin was 2.75 g/m2/day for 5 days. The objective response rate was 83% with a complete response rate of 33% (6/18 patients); the median time to treatment failure was 11.5 months. The median survival has not been reached and will exceed 18 months. We concluded that the recommended dose of ifosfamide in combination with doxorubicin is 2.5 g/m2/day for 5 days. This combination shows promise in stage IV breast cancer.     

Late complications after open carpal tunnel decompression

BACKGROUND: The NCIC Clinical Trial Group has an ongoing interest in assessing investigational agents in minimally pretreated patients with malignant glioma. Topotecan is one of the first topoisomerase I inhibitors to enter clinical trials and has shown early evidence of activity in several solid tumors. We have conducted a phase II trial of topotecan in patients with malignant glioma. METHODS: Adults with malignant glioma and recurrent contrast enhancing measurable disease (> or = 2 x 2 cm) were eligible. Topotecan 1.5 mg/m2 i.v. was given daily x five days every three weeks. Response and toxic effects were assessed at the end of each cycle. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients were entered onto the study: fifteen had glioblastoma, 16 anaplastic astrocytoma, all had prior radiation, 15 prior chemotherapy, and all were assessable for response and toxicity. Two patients (6%) responded: one had a complete radiographic response, but died with neutropenic sepsis, and the second had a prolonged partial response (> 97 weeks). Twenty-one patients (68%) had stable disease for five to 86 + weeks (median 19) and eight (26%) had progressive disease after one cycle. Toxicity was primarily hematologic; 18 (58%) had grade 4 neutropenia (< 0.5 x 10(9)/1), usually brief, and three (10%) grade 4 thrombocytopenia (< 25 x 10(9)/1). Twelve of 109 cycles (11%) were given at reduced dose. CONCLUSIONS: Topotecan in this dose and schedule has only modest activity in recurrent glioblastoma and anaplastic astrocytoma.     

DIZE (dexamethasone, idarubicin, and continuous infusion of ifosfamide and etoposide): an effective and well-tolerated new regimen for patients with relapsed lymphoma

We performed a phase II study of dexamethasone, ifosfamide, idarubicin and etoposide (DIZE) in patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin's (HL) and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). The regimen consisted of dexamethasone (20 mg i.v. days 1-4), idarubicin (8 mg/m2 i.v. days 1+2), continuous infusion (c.i.) of ifosfamide (1,000 mg/m2 days 1-4), and c.i. etoposide (60 mg/m2 days 1-4). G-CSF (5 microg/kg) was used to support neutrophil recovery from day 5. In older patients (> 60 years) the dosage of idarubicin and ifosfamide was reduced to 75% in the initial cycle. Fourty six patients (pts) were treated with a total of 131 cycles. Sixteen pts were primary resistant and 30 were relapsed. Median age was 54.3 years (range 22-75). The median number of different prior chemotherapies was 1.7 (range 1 to 5). 31/46 (67.4%) pts had advanced disease (stage III or IV); 19/46 had B symptoms. Of 43 evaluable pts the response rate was 58.1% including 11 complete remissions (CR) and 14 partial remissions (PR). Mean duration of response was 8 months (1-30+). DIZE was more effective in relapsed than in refractory high-grade NHL (74 % vs 16.6%; p < 0.001). Of four heavily pretreated pts with HL, one obtained CR and two PR (response rate 75%). Myelosuppression was generally moderate with a mean duration of leukocytopenia < 1,000/microl of 2.5 days (range 0-18) and of thrombocytopenia < 25,000/microl 1.5 days (range 0-17). One patient died of uncontrollable infection in treatment related neutropenia. No other serious toxicities apart from alopecia were observed. We conclude that DIZE is safe and effective in heavily pretreated pts with relapsed lymphoma. The continuous infusion of cytostatic drugs such as that used in the new DIZE protocol might reduce hematotoxicity.     

Phase I study of daily times five topotecan and single injection of cisplatin in patients with previously untreated non-small-cell lung carcinoma

BACKGROUND: The objectives were to determine the dose-limiting toxicity of topotecan in combination with cisplatin, to describe the principal toxicities, and to define the maximally-tolerated doses of the drugs in previously untreated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study was designed to evaluate escalated doses of topotecan (starting at 0.75 mg/m2/day) as a 30-minute infusion daily for five consecutive days with a fixed clinically-relevant dose of 75 mg/m2 cisplatin given on day 1, every three weeks. RESULTS: Fifteen chemotherapy-naive patients entered the study and 14 were evaluable for toxicity. All 11 patients treated at the first topotecan/cisplatin dose level of 0.75/75 mg/m2, experienced at least one episode of grade 4 neutropenia. For six patients, absolute neutrophil counts were below 500/ml for more than five days, and two of them developed a grade 4 thrombocytopenia. At the next higher topotecan/cisplatin dose level (1.0/75 mg/m2), grade 4 neutropenia lasting longer than five days occurred in all three evaluable patients, including one patient who expired due to a severe neutropenia associated with sepsis. Non-hematologic toxicities, predominantly nausea and vomiting, were mild to moderate in severity and manageable. Four patients had partial responses (30.7%; 95% confidence interval (9%-61%) of relatively short duration. CONCLUSION: Both severe neutropenia and thrombocytopenia precluded dose escalation of topotecan and cisplatin administered on this schedule. In previously untreated patients, the first topotecan/cisplatin dose level (0.75/75 mg/m2), was associated with intolerable myelosuppression, and, therefore, the dose levels evaluated in this study cannot be recommended for subsequent phase II investigations. The high toxicity of this schedule and the recent understanding of the pharmacokinetic interaction between those drugs may encourage the investigation of the alternate sequence of cisplatin after TPT in phase II studies.     

Analysis of FMR1 and flanking microsatellite markers in normal and fragile X chromosomes in Portugal: evidence for a "protector" haplotype

The authors evaluate the combination of three drugs, vinorelbine, ifosfamide, and cisplatin, which have been shown to produce good response rates and a significant gain in survival when any two of them are given together. Seventy-seven untreated patients with inoperable stage III-IV non-small-cell lung cancer from three centers were included. The combination consisted of cisplatin 30 mg/m2 daily, ifosfamide 1,500 mg/m2 daily, mesna 1,500 mg/m2 daily on days 1-3, and vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 daily on days 1 and 8. Four cycles were administered every 4 weeks for a total of 267 cycles, before an assessment for toxicity, effective dose intensity, response rate, and survival was made. Toxicity was mainly hematologic (grade 3-4 neutropenia (15.7%), anemia (8.2%), and thrombopenia (2.6%)) but did not require granulocyte colony-stimulating factors. Objective response rate was 41.1% (95% confidence interval, 29.5-52.9%) in 68 patients suitable for assessment. The mean time to progression and median survival were 7.7 +/- 1.3 months and 11.6 months, respectively. One-year survival was 47.1%. The effective dose intensity of cisplatin and ifosfamide correlated strongly with survival, whereas stage and performance status did not. This study confirms previously reported favorable results for response and survival rates obtained in stage III-IV non-small-cell lung cancer with the vinorelbine, ifosfamide, and cisplatin combination. Respect of a scheduled dose intensity has a clear-cut influence on survival and should be evaluated routinely in future polychemotherapy trials.     

Phase I multicenter study of combined high-dose ifosfamide and doxorubicin in the treatment of advanced sarcomas. Swiss Group for Clinical Research (SAKK)

Ifosfamide and doxorubicin are the most active agents in the treatment of sarcomas and are characterized by a marked dose-response relationship. The objective of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of both agents in combination under granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) cover. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-three patients with untreated sarcomas (soft tissue: n = 20; gynecological: n = 11; bone: n = 2) were treated with ifosfamide 12 g/m2 by continuous i.v. infusion over five days and doxorubicin with dose escalation from 50 mg/m2 i.v. bolus divided on two days, then to 60 mg/m2 bolus divided on three days. Ifosfamide was reduced to 10 g/m2 and doxorubicin was further escalated up to 90 mg/m2. GM-CSF (5 micrograms/kg/day subcutaneously) was started 24 hours after chemotherapy and continued for 10 days. RESULTS: The MTD was reached with the combination of ifosfamide at 12 g/m2 and doxorubicin at 60 mg/m2. But with ifosfamide 10 g/m2 and doxorubicin 90 mg/m2 the MTD was not obtained. While severe leukopenia and granulopenia were observed at all-dose levels, severe anemia was more frequently related to the highest dose of ifosfamide. Severe thrombopenia and mucositis were more commonly observed at the highest dose of doxorubicin. Ifosfamide 10 g/m2 and doxorubicin 90 mg/m2 induced WHO grade 4 leukopenia in 58%, grade 3-4 thrombopenia in 42%, and anemia in 31% of cycles. Mucositis was minor in 50% of cycles. The overall response rate among 31 evaluable patients was 55% (95 confidence interval (CI): 36%-73%), with four (13%) complete responders and 13 (42%) partial responders. Response rates based on soft-tissue sarcomas or gynecological sarcomas alone were similar. Ten patients could be treated by elective surgery and/or radiotherapy. The total group of patients reached a median survival of two years, with 25% (SE 8%) survivors after three years. CONCLUSIONS: The dose level of ifosfamide 10 g/m2 and doxorubicin 90 mg/m2 with supportive GM-CSF is manageable in a multicenter setting and should be further tested in regular phase II trials, including patients with gynecological and soft-tissue sarcomas. Transient toxicity with myelosuppression should be accepted in order to obtain a high antitumor activity of this regimen and a potential improvement in survival.     

Three unrelated perturbations similarly uncouple fluid, bulk-membrane, and receptor endosomal flow in rat fetal fibroblasts

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: We investigated the efficacy and tolerability of two doses of paclitaxel, 175 mg/m2 and 135 mg/m2, over a 3-hr infusion, without prophylactic G-CSF, in heavily pretreated patients with anthracycline-resistant breast cancer. Although paclitaxel may share with anthracyclines a common mechanism of drug resistance, there is evidence that the two drugs are not completely cross resistant. METHODS: From July 1994 to January 1996, 42 patients were treated every 3 weeks, for a maximum of 6 cycles; paclitaxel dose was established according to pretreatment extension. RESULTS: In 41 assessable patients we observed 9 partial responses, for an overall response rate of 22% (95% CI, 10-34%). There was no difference in response rate between the two dose levels. Median duration of response was 9 months, median time to progression 5 months, and median survival 9 months. The dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenia, which was grade 3-4 in 40% (135 mg/m2) and 62% (175 mg/m2) of the patients (P = 0.28); neutropenic fever occurred in 24% of the patients, without significant differences between the two dose levels. Other toxicity was mild to moderate. CONCLUSIONS: Paclitaxel at doses of 175 mg/m2 or 135 mg/m2 is active and well tolerated in advanced breast cancer patients resistant to anthracyclines. The prophylactic use of colony-stimulating factors seems appropriate in heavily pretreated patients given the higher dose level.     

Magnetic resonance imaging of seronegative sacroiliitis

A total of 27 patients with advanced previously untreated non-small-cell lung cancer were treated with paclitaxel and ifosfamide. The starting dose of paclitaxel was 175 mg/m2 given for 3 h by intravenous infusion on day 1. Ifosfamide 4 g/m2 was given for 4 h by intravenous infusion on day 2. Dosage of the two drugs was modified according to nadir white blood count after each cycle. Involved in the treatment were 17 males and 10 female patients. The median age was 61 years (range 47-71 years) and the median Karnofsky performance status was 70% (range 60-90%), 13 cases were stage IIIb and 14 cases were stage IV. One case was not evaluable due to lost follow-up after a single dose of chemotherapy. There were five cases not determined due to a timing error. Of 21 evaluable cases, eight achieved partial response (PR 38%, confidence interval 18.1-61.5%), seven achieved stable disease, two had a minor response. The median survival time of the whole group was 255 days (range from 38 to 567 days). The major toxicities were myalgia; arthralgia and neuropathies. Throughout the study, only three cases (15%) were treated at dose level 0. After the first cycle, 18 cases were treated at dose level 1, after a second cycle, 13 cases were treated at dose level 2. Three cases with grade 3 leukopenia were seen at dose level 0. At dose level 1, two cases had grade 3 leukopenia. At dose level 2, four episodes of grade 3 leukopenia were noted. It is concluded that paclitaxel can be combined safely with ifosfamide at these dosage levels. The response rates were comparable to the other chemotherapy combination in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. The survival results were acceptable and comparable to the cisplatin-containing regimen. This study indicates that combinations of paclitaxel and/or ifosfamide with other agents, such as gemcitabine and vinorelbine, should be explored.     

Confocal microscopic localization of anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein autoantibodies in a patient with peripheral neuropathy initially lacking a detectable IgM gammopathy

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: The neutropenia induced by six courses of an intensified FEC regimen is expected to be checked by early primary administration of G-CSF which is stopped eight days before the next chemotherapy course. Less information is available about megakaryocytic and erythroid toxicity over six courses. METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: Sixty-six consecutive patients with metastatic breast cancer completed six courses of a randomized treatment with two FEC regimens administered every 21 days, in which 600 mg/m2 of cyclophosphamide and 5-FUwas associated with 60 or 120 mg/m2 of epirubicin (60FEC, 35 patients, vs 120FEC, 31 patients). 120FEC was supported by early primary G-CSF (days 4 to 13). Blood counts were obtained seven times during each course. RESULTS: The non-hematologic toxicity over 364 courses was similar in 60FEC and 120FEC. No cumulative hematologic toxicity was observed for white blood cells (WBC) and platelets (PLT), while for hemoglobin (Hb) a somewhat higher cumulative toxicity was observed with 120FEC than with 60FEC. WBC, PLT and Hb grade III-IV toxicity occurred in 40.1% and 45.6% (P=ns), in 23.1% and 0.8% (P <.0001) and in 15.6% and 3.0% (P <.005) of the two regimens, respectively. There were no febrile or hemorrhagic episodes. The epirubicin relative dose intensity delivered was 1.95 in 120FEC with respect to 60FEC. CONCLUSIONS: Our G-CSF schedule permitted to deliver six courses of 120FEC without any clinically relevant side effects. Grade III-IV leukopenia was similar with 120FEC and 60FEC, while grade III-IV thrombocytopenia and anemia occurred more often with 120FEC than with 60FEC.     

A phase I/II study of multicyclic dose-intensive chemotherapy supported with G-CSF, or G-CSF and haematopoietic progenitor cells in whole blood, in two consecutive cohorts of patients

We investigated the reconstitutive potential of haematopoietic progenitor cells collected in autologous whole blood during multicycle dose-intensified chemotherapy. Forty patients with metastatic solid tumours were treated with up to six cycles of cisplatin and escalating doses of ifosfamide every 14 days. Cisplatin was administered in 3% sodium chloride over 3 h, followed by ifosfamide over 24 h and mesna over 36 h. The first cohort of patients received granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) days 4-14. Once dose-limiting toxicity was reached in cohort 1, the study continued with a second cohort of patients, in whom, in addition to G-CSF on days 4-14, 500 ml of G-CSF and chemotherapy-'primed' whole blood was collected on day 15, i.e. on day 1 of treatment cycles two to six, before cisplatin administration. This volume of blood was kept unprocessed at 4 degrees C and reinfused 20-24 h after the completion of ifosfamide. In cohort 1, dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was reached at ifosfamide 6.0 g m(-2) with two out of six of the patients developing neutropenic fever. Although in cohort 2 no neutropenic fever was encountered, neither the frequency nor the duration of grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were reduced. Cumulative asthenia resulted in DLT at 7.0 g m(-2). The median number of CD34+ cells in 500 ml of whole blood after the first cycle (i.e. at start of cycle 2) was 1.15 x 10(6) kg(-1). This number was significantly greater after the second cycle (2.06 x 10(6) kg(-1), P = 0.01) and then gradually decreased after cycles three to six. After storing whole blood, the number of CD34+ cells had not decreased (median + 10%). We conclude that the method of combined bone marrow support by G-CSF and haematopoietic progenitor cells in autologous whole blood collected before each cycle of a 2-weekly regimen of cisplatin-ifosfamide does not result in clinically measurable reduced bone marrow toxicity compared with what can be expected by the use of G-CSF alone.     

Rapidly cycled courses of high-dose alkylating agents supported by filgrastim and peripheral blood progenitor cells in patients with metastatic breast cancer

Our purpose was to determine the feasibility of a regimen of multiple, rapidly cycled courses of high-dose alkylating agents, including paired courses of escalating doses of thiotepa, supported by peripheral blood progenitor cells and filgrastim, in patients with responding stage IV breast cancer. The regimen consisted of two courses of cyclophosphamide (3.0 g/m2/course) followed by two courses of thiotepa (500-700 mg/m2/course). All courses were supported by filgrastim. Leukaphereses were performed after each cyclophosphamide course to harvest peripheral blood progenitors (PBPs) for use as rescue following thiotepa administration. The planned interval for all courses was 14 days. Forty-two patients were enrolled. Thirty-eight received all four courses, and four did not receive the second thiotepa cycle due to poor PBP mobilization. The maximum dose of thiotepa that was administered was 700 mg/m2 x 2. At this dose, one patient developed encephalopathy, which resolved over several weeks. The median number of days to an absolute neutrophil count of 0.5 x 10(9)/liter after PBP reinfusion for cycles 1 and 2 of thiotepa were 9 (range, 7-16) and 9 (range, 8-13) days, respectively. The corresponding values for platelet recovery to >20 x 10(9)/liter were 11 (range, 8-39) and 12 (range, 10-28) days, respectively. There were no treatment-related deaths. Hospitalization was required following 28 of 84 cyclophosphamide courses and 76 of 80 thiotepa courses. Four patients developed grade III-IV mucositis. The median interval between courses of treatment was 15 (range, 13-29) days. Of 19 patients who entered the protocol with measurable disease in partial response from prior therapy, 8 (42%) achieved complete response following the high-dose therapy. Nine (21%) of 42 remain progression free at a median follow-up of 28 (range, 20-32) months. Therefore, we concluded that the administration of multiple, rapidly cycled courses of high-dose alkylating agents is feasible.